DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL BUDGET and Capital Plan Fiscal Year 2014–2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANNUAL BUDGET and Capital Plan Fiscal Year 2014–2015 – City of Tulsa, Oklahoma – ANNUAL BUDGET and capital plan Fiscal Year 2014–2015 1 – About the T heme – Route 66 was designated an official federal highway in 1926, stretching 2,448 miles from Chicago to Los Angeles, through eight states and three time zones. Four hundred miles of Route 66 pass through Oklahoma – more than any other state – and 23 of those miles pass through the city of Tulsa. Tulsa was home to Cyrus Stevens Avery, the “Father of Route 66.” As Oklahoma Highway Commissioner, Avery influenced the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads to create Route 66 and bring its alignment through Tulsa, especially on the 11th Street bridge across the Arkansas River. This bridge, renamed in 2004 the Cyrus Avery Route 66 Memorial Bridge, serves as a focal point of Tulsa’s recent enhancements and promotion of the national highway known as the “Mother Road.” The Cyrus Avery Route 66 Centennial Plaza at the northeast end of the bridge features a $1 million, 20,000-pound bronze sculpture, “East Meets West,” and flags from the eight states through which Route 66 passes. Over the past decade, Tulsa has allocated $20 million for projects to celebrate the importance of “America’s Main Street” and to encourage economic development and tourism on Route 66. Photos in this book highlight Route 66 roadside landmarks and attractions. 2 3 ANNUAL BUDGET & CAPITAL PLAN SECTION CONTENTS Policies 1 Executive Summary 2 Funds 3 Departments 4 CIP Executive Summary 5 FY14 Capital Budget and Funded Programs 6 Constrained Capital Projects Inventory 7 FY14-18 CIP Funding Schedule 8 Appendix 9 Index 10 4 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS & FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SectionMayor’s Budget One—Policies Presentation Mess age ......................................................................................... ......... 1-1 PDF Mayor’s Budget Presentation Message .................................................................................................. 1-1 10 Transmittal Letter from the Mayor to the City Council .............................................................................. 1-5 14 Letter from the City Council to the Citizens ............................................................................................ 1-12 21 Strategic Plan Initiative ......................................................................................................................... 1-13 22 Financial Policies ................................................................................................................................... 1-14 23 Ordinance Adopting the Annual Budget .................................................................................................. 1-18 27 Ordinance Adopting the Capital Improvements Plan .............................................................................. 1-21 30 Section Two—Executive Summary Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 2-1 33 City of Tulsa Organizational Chart ....................................................................................................... 2-27 59 Budget and Planning Process .............................................................................................................. 2-28 60 Five-Year Financial Forecast ............................................................................................................... 2-29 61 Community Profile ................................................................................................................................ 2-32 64 Map of Tulsa ........................................................................................................................................ 2-36 68 Section Three—Funds Fund Structure by Budgetary Basis .................................................................................................... 3-1 70 General Fund ......................................................................................................... (1080) 3-3 71 Air Force Plant 3 Fund ............................................................................................ (2240) 3-13 82 P.A. Law Enforcement Training Fund .................................................................... (2320) 3-15 84 Juvenile Curfew Fines Fund ................................................................................... (2330) 3-17 86 E911 Fee Operating Fund ...................................................................................... (2420) 3-19 88 Economic Development Commission Fund ............................................................ (2710) 3-21 90 Convention & Visitors Fund .................................................................................... (2720) 3-23 92 Tulsa’s Future Fund ............................................................................................... (2730) 3-25 94 Convention & Tourism Fund .................................................................................. (2810) 3-27 96 Short-Term Capital Fund ........................................................................................ (2910) 3-29 98 Municipal Employees' Retirement Plan Fund ......................................................... (3000) 3-31 100 One Technology Center .......................................................................................... (3450) 3-33 102 RMUA-General Operating Fund ............................................................................. (3551) 3-35 104 Tulsa Authority for Recovery of Energy Fund ........................................................ (3623) 3-37 106 Tulsa Stadium Improvement District Special Assessment Fund ............................ (4102) 3-39 108 Whittier Square Improvement District Special Assessment Fund ........................... (4122) 3-41 110 Sinking Fund .......................................................................................................... (4306) 3-43 112 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) ....................................... (5501) 3-45 114 Emergency Solutions Grant ................................................................................... (5520) 3-47 116 Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) .................................................... (5521) 3-49 118 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) ....................................................... (5535) 3-51 120 P.D. Forfeiture Awards Fund .................................................................................. (5761) 3-53 122 Miscellaneous Capital Projects Fund ..................................................................... (6001) 3-55 124 2001 Five-Year Sales Tax Fund ............................................................................. (6008) 3-58 126 2006 Special Extended Sales Tax Fund ................................................................ (6009) 3-60 128 5 Funds—Continued 2008 Sales Tax Special Temporary Streets Fund ................................................... (6011) 3-62 131 1985 Sales Tax Economic Development Fund ....................................................... (6012) 3-64 133 2014 Sales Tax Fund .............................................................................................. (6014) 3-66 135 TMUA Water Capital Projects Fund ........................................................................ (6021) 3-72 141 TMUA Sewer Capital Projects Fund ........................................................................ (6031) 3-75 144 Stormwater Capital Projects Fund ........................................................................... (6041) 3-77 146 Stormwater Management Enterprise Fund ............................................................. (7010) 3-79 148 TMUA Water Operating Fund ................................................................................ (7020) 3-82 151 TMUA Sewer Operating Fund ................................................................................ (7030) 3-85 154 Golf Course Operating Fund .................................................................................. (7050) 3-88 157 EMSA Enterprise Fund ................................................................................................................. (7060) 3-90 159 Office Services Internal Service Fund .................................................................... (8011) 3-92 161 Employees' Insurance Service Fund ...................................................................... (8020) 3-94 163 Equipment Management Service Fund .................................................................. (8030) 3-96 165 Completed Grants to be Closed ............................................................................................................ 3-98 167 Completed Capital Improvement Projects to be Closed ........................................................................ 3-99 168 Section Four—Departments PUBLIC SAFETY AND PROTECTION Municipal Court ...................................................................................................................................... 4-3 173 Police Department .................................................................................................................................. 4-7 177 Fire Department ................................................................................................................................... 4-12 182 EMSA ...................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Route 66 in Oklahoma: a Historic Context Review
    Route 66 in Oklahoma: A Historic Context Review A Perspective on Topics and Sources for Archives Collections and Oral History Studies This document suggests topics and ideas for additional research along Oklahoma’s portion of Route 66. Primarily, the review is intended to assist researchers collecting information about Route 66 by collecting oral histories and organizing research projects. This outline may also be used to encourage the preservation of archival materials and artifacts. The topical headings are random in order. I. Waterways crossing or near Route 66 A. The waterways that crossed or came very near the roadway including bridges, ferries, low water crossing, and other roadway features that are related to waterways. Waterways were the most important landmark for early native travelers and for early explorers. The same waterways continue to be important for the obstacles for the original and later roadways. 1. Neosho/Grand River 2. Grand River 3. Verdigris River 4. Arkansas River 5. Deep Fork River (Canadian River) 6. North Canadian River (Now the Oklahoma River as of 2006) 7. South Canadian River (Sometimes just called the Canadian River) 8. Red River 9. Deep Fork Creek in Oklahoma City 10. Cat and Dog Creeks in Claremore Waterways may be researched at the Oklahoma Department of Transportation or the Corps of Engineers office. The Works Progress Administration Federal Writers Project papers are available at the Oklahoma Historical Society and may offer additional insight into the changes in Oklahoma waterways. II. American Indian Lands or Reserves crossed by Route 66 or near Route 66 A. Quapaw B. Miami C.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indians & Route 66
    American Indians & Route 66 AMERICAN INDIANS & ROUTE 66 | 01 ON OUR COVER: ‘SEEING THROUGH THE PATTERNS’ Geraldine Lozano is a conceptual artist based out of Brooklyn, New York. She works using photo, video performance, artist books, and public art in her practice. Her video installation work has been funded by the Creative Work Fund and the Zellerbach Foundation of San Francisco, California. Lozano’s public art can be seen in the architecturally integrated art of eco-resin screens set into the bus shelters of BRIO, Sun Metro’s new rapid transit system. Gera, as she as also known in the street art world, creates femenine artwork that is conscious and provocative. Her studio work and public art work reflect the spirit of culture and dreams. – www.geralozano.com American Indians & Route 66 AMERICAN INDIANS & ROUTE 66 | 01 MAP KEY Route 66 American Indian Reservation Tribal Jurisdictions (Oklahoma) Trust Land ABOUT THIS MAP Route 66 cartography provided by Pueblo of Sandia GIS Program, Pueblo of Sandia, Bernalillo, New Mexico Route 66 historic alignment information derived from National Park Service data and Rick Martin’s online resource, http://route66map. publishpath.com/ Tribal land status and base mapping provided by Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Trust Services Division of Water and Power DID DIDYOU YOUKNOW? KNOW? DID YOU KNOW? INTRODUCTION AMERICAN INDIANS AND ROUTE 66 Route 66 was an officially commissioned highway from 1926 Route 66 begins in Grant Park, Chicago—or ends there— to 1985. During its lifetime, the road guided travelers through depending on which direction you’re traveling. At the intersection the lands of more than 25 tribal nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 66 Economic Impact Study Contents 6 SECTION ONE Introduction, History, and Summary of Benefi Ts
    SYNTHESIS OF FINDINGS A study conducted by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in collaboration with the National Park Service Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program and World Monuments Fund Study funded by American Express SYNTHESIS OF FINDINGS A study conducted by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in collaboration with the National Park Service Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program and World Monuments Fund Study funded by American Express Center for Urban Policy Research Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, New Jersey June 2011 AUTHORS David Listokin and David Stanek Kaitlynn Davis Michael Lahr Orin Puniello Garrett Hincken Ningyuan Wei Marc Weiner with Michelle Riley Andrea Ryan Sarah Collins Samantha Swerdloff Jedediah Drolet Charles Heydt other participating researchers include Carissa Johnson Bing Wang Joshua Jensen Center for Urban Policy Research Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, New Jersey ISBN-10 0-9841732-3-4 ISBN-13 978-0-9841732-3-5 This report in its entirety may be freely circulated; however content may not be reproduced independently without the permission of Rutgers, the National Park Service, and World Monuments Fund. 1929 gas station in Mclean, Texas Route 66 Economic Impact Study contents 6 SECTION ONE Introduction, History, and Summary of Benefi ts 16 SECTION TWO Tourism and Travelers 27 SECTION THREE Museums and Route 66 30 SECTION FOUR Main Street and Route 66 39 SECTION FIVE The People and Communities of Route 66 51 SECTION SIX Opportunities for the Road 59 Acknowledgements 5 SECTION ONE Introduction, History, and Summary of Benefi ts unning about 2,400 miles from Chicago, Illinois, to Santa Monica, California, Route 66 is an American and international icon, myth, carnival, and pilgrimage.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulsa's Route 66 Master Plan
    plan Tulsa’s Route 66 Master Plan plan Adoption Information The Executive Summary and Chapter 5 – Recommendations were adopted by Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission and approved by Tulsa City Council. Effective: December 2020 For questions, contact: Paulina Baeza, Senior Planner [email protected] Dennis Whitaker, Planner [email protected] Tulsa Planning Office 2 W 2nd St., 8th Floor Tulsa, OK 74103 918.584.7526 tulsaplanning.org plan Table of Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ................................................................ 4 Introduction .....................................................................................5 Background .....................................................................................5 Purpose Statement .........................................................................7 Vision ...............................................................................................7 Chapter 1 — Background ........................................................ 8 Route 66 History .............................................................................9 Tulsa’s Previous Route 66 Master Plan (2005) ......................... 10 Other Studies and Plans .............................................................. 10 Case Study .................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2 — Existing Conditions .......................................... 14 The Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby Rose Stauber, Papers
    Ruby Rose Stauber Papers (SP0015) Collection Number: SP0015 Collection Title: Ruby Rose Stauber Papers Dates: 1777-2016 Creator: Stauber, Ruby Rose Abstract: The papers of Rose Stauber contain the personal papers of Ruby Rose Stauber. They include correspondence, genealogical research, family photographs, and material related to Rose’s 31 years of service in the Women’s Army Corp. Collection Size: 13.5 cubic feet (452 folders, 2 oversize) Language: Collection materials are in English. Repository: The State Historical Society of Missouri Restrictions on Access: Collection is open for research. This collection is available at The State Historical Society of Missouri Research Center-Springfield. If you would like more information, please contact us at [email protected]. Collections may be viewed at any research center. Restrictions on Use: The Donor has given, assigned, and transferred to the Society all copyrights, and associated rights the Donor may possess in the materials. Preferred Citation: [Specific item; box number; folder number] Ruby Rose Stauber Papers (SP0015); The State Historical Society of Missouri Research Center-Springfield [after first mention may be abbreviated to SHSMO-Springfield]. (SP0015) Ruby Rose Stauber Papers Page 2 Donor Information: The papers were donated to the State Historical Society of Missouri by Ruby Rose Stauber on July 23, 2016 (Accession No. SP0017). Processed by: Processed by Katie Seale, February 10, 2017 Historical Note: Ruby Rose Stauber was born on 6 August 1928, on the Stauber farm near Noel, Missouri. Rose was the oldest child of Anna Pearl Rose Stauber (1905-1971) and Martin Stevens Stauber (1903- 1992). Graduating from Noel High School in 1946, Rose went on to Southwest Missouri State University (now Missouri State University) graduating in 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 66 Master Plan Part 2
    Cyrus Avery Route 66 Memorial Bridge As noted earlier, the Cyrus Avery Route 66 Memorial Bridge is the major iconic structure remaining along Route 66 in Tulsa County. Its importance to Tulsa and the City’s connection to Route 66 cannot be overstated. The restoration of the bridge to its original condition should be the ultimate objective. However, given the cost of restoration and the limited funding ! " available from Vision 2025 for the enhancement and promotion of Route 66, the restoration of the bridge is not one of the projects recommended for implementation at this time. The underwater inspection of the bridge footings revealed that, although undermining is present at some locations, the footings are stable and should remain that way for several more years. With the measurements taken during the underwater inspection, a baseline now exists against which additional undermining can be measured, thereby enabling the City to monitor the stability of both structures in the future. If the undermining, scour, scaling, or spalling progresses to the point that they destabilize the foundation of the bridge, the City can at that time implement one of the two foundation repairs recommended in the in-depth Inspection and Evaluation Report prepared by Dewberry, dated June 3, 2005. # Irrespective of the recommendation to delay the complete restoration of the bridge structures until a future date, it is recommended that Vision 2025 $ money be used to improve the aesthetics of the bridge. The vegetation % & growing on the bridge should be eliminated and all cracks and crevices $ " should be cleaned and sealed. In addition, decorative lighting, reminiscent of the style utilized in the late 1920’s or early 1930’s, should be installed to illuminate the bridge and enhance the view from the Cyrus Avery Centennial Plaza, the Avery Park Southwest, and the Route 66 Xperience.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Transportation History
    Arizona Transportation History Final Report 660 December 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation Research Center DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers' names which may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report. The U.S. Government and the State of Arizona do not endorse products or manufacturers. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-AZ-11-660 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date December 2011 ARIZONA TRANSPORTATION HISTORY 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mark E. Pry, Ph.D. and Fred Andersen 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. History Plus 315 E. Balboa Dr. 11. Contract or Grant No. Tempe, AZ 85282 SPR-PL-1(173)-655 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.Type of Report & Period Covered ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 206 S. 17TH AVENUE PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Project Manager: Steven Rost, Ph.D. 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The Arizona transportation history project was conceived in anticipation of Arizona’s centennial, which will be celebrated in 2012. Following approval of the Arizona Centennial Plan in 2007, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) recognized that the centennial celebration would present an opportunity to inform Arizonans of the crucial role that transportation has played in the growth and development of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Tulsa Neighborhood Plan Phase One Detailed Implementation Plan
    Southwest Tulsa Neighborhood Plan Phase One Detailed Implementation Plan Tulsa Planning Department Southwest Tulsa Planning TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page Number Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….. 3-26 Southwest Boulevard Design Considerations………………………………………………………….. 27-49 Transportation Trails………………………………………………………………………………… 50-57 Sidewalks…………………………………………………………………………... 58 Transportation Park……………………………………………………………………… 59-76 Route 66 Byway Facility…………………………………………………………………. 77-84 Campus Plan ……………………………………………………………………………… 85-103 Housing Study…………………………………………………………………………….. 104-128 Appendix A- Federal Housing Programs…………………………………………….. 129-139 Appendix B- Selected Demographics………………………………………………… 140-155 2 Southwest Tulsa Planning SOUTHWEST TULSA COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PLANNING INTRODUCTION It is a process by which area residents, businesses, property owners, area stakeholders (including churches, schools, and service organizations) meet together with city planners to determine neighborhood conditions and discover community-defined issues and community-preferred solutions for area resurgence. The Southwest Tulsa Revitalization area will generally be bounded by the Arkansas River on the east and north and a logical south and west border to be determined by the group. The Southwest Tulsa Planning Team has been working in the area shown. The planning team has decided to construct the plan in various components that will summarize a comprehensive approach to planning Southwest Tulsa. 3 Southwest Tulsa Planning Why is Southwest
    [Show full text]
  • Route 66 Through Texas Historic Context
    Historic Resources Survey Route 66 through Texas Final Draft March 2005 Historic Context Prepared For: The Texas Historical Commission Friends of the Texas Historical Commission The National Park Service, Long Distance Trails Group Office Prepared By: Monica Penick Consulting Architectural Historian Austin, Texas Principal Authors: Monica Penick, Architectural Historian Gregory Smith, National Register Coordinator, THC US Route 66 in Texas - Statement of Historic Context The significance of U.S. Highway 66, perhaps the best-known and most-often romanticized transportation corridor in the nation, lies at the intersection of the history of highway development, commerce, travel, tourism, and popular culture. Its importance is socio-cultural, economic, and to some extent, political. The interest (both historic and contemporary) in this highway and the subculture that it has spawned demonstrates that Route 66 was no ordinary road. While not the oldest or the longest transcontinental highway, Route 66 became the nation’s first all-weather road, linking Chicago to Los Angeles.1 The 2,400 extant miles (approximately) of Route 66 represent the development of a nationwide transportation infrastructure – notably marking every phase in the transition from dirt roads to super highways – and simultaneously underscore the economic and cultural effects of automobile travel. Ultimately, the story of Route 66 is the story of a newly mobile nation (and the responses to this lifestyle), of increasing geographic cohesion, and of the democratization of travel. The period of significance for Route 66 in Texas extends from 1926 to 1970. While this period encompasses a number of seemingly disparate historical eras, the life of the highway provides an uninterrupted – though not unchanging – thread through nearly five decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 66 Developed a Mythical Stature
    May - June 2003 !" Vol. 25, No. 3 Newsletter of the Cultural Resources Division !" Kansas State Historical Society Over the years, Route 66 developed a mythical stature. While just over thirteen miles of the “Mother Road” cross through Kansas, the impact on the commercial and cultural landscape is significant. Article on page 5. uring the summer of 2002, the Kansas State The archeological staff of the State Historic Preserva- DHistorical Society contracted with Historic tion Office also examined the corridor for the presence Preservation Services, LLC (HPS) of Kansas City, of Route 66-related archeological resources and identi- Missouri, to inventory the resources historically associ- fied five sites that might merit inclusion in the National ated with Route 66 in Kansas. The roots of this project Register. lie in an initiative of the National Park Service (NPS) to Following the completion of the survey, HPS document and preserve the history of this important prepared a National Register Multiple Property Docu- transportation corridor. The NPS 1995 “Special mentation Form (MPDF) for “Historic Resources of Resources Study” of Route 66 describes the road as “a Route 66 in Kansas” and three National Register nomi- prime example of a historic transportation corridor — nations. The first nomination documents a historic a linear cultural landscape comprising a historically district that includes a section of historic roadbed east significant route along which people and/or goods of downtown Galena and a viaduct and several culverts have moved.” The most significant, defining aspects of built in 1923. This district is a rare example of the this cultural landscape are the public works and the cultural landscape of the road as it appeared when commercial architecture, as well as other distinctive designated as US 66 in 1926.
    [Show full text]
  • ! Curric Guide 10/2
    3 Clues Sheet Route 66 ran from Chicago to Los Angeles, creating connections between hundreds of small towns.The chief supporter of the highway,Cyrus Avery,coined the route’s nickname—Main Street of America.The road was completed in the 1930s and used as a trucking route through the Southwest. Hundreds of thousands of families piled their possessions into their cars and took this road to migrate west to California during and after the Great Depression. A great percentage of the migrating families came from Oklahoma,Arkansas,Texas,and Missouri,but they moved for different reasons. Some left due to the drought that caused the Dust Bowl. Others left as a result of the federal New Deal policy that encouraged families to stop growing crops in order to boost market prices. But the majority of travelers were city dwellers seeking a better life in California. Tourists also traveled this route, for adventure and to experience the freedom of travel. By the 1940s, family-owned hotels,gasoline stations,and stores designed for the convenience of tourists were well-established. 3-1 Haggard family photo,1935 (Courtesy of Lillian Haggard Hoge) The Haggard family left the farm they leased in Oklahoma because of poor health and a fire that destroyed their barn in 1935.They bought a 1926 Chevrolet sedan, hooked up a trailer,loaded some of their precious belongings—including a camera—and headed to California.They took this picture of their journey along Route 66.When they arrived,they lived in a remodeled railroad refrigerator car. Merle Haggard,the famous country singer,was born after the family moved to California.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Route 66 History
    NPS Form 1&800-D OM8 NO. 102CW16 (Mu 7999) Aeh MS Word Formst United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is for use in daumenting multiple property groups relating to one or several hlstwic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Cwnpleting National Register Fonns (Nations! Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additiod space use continuation sheets (Form l(F9M)e) Type all entries. -x New Submission - Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Route 66 in Missouri B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying them, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Automobile Tourism and Roadside Commerce, Route 66 in Missouri, 1926 - 1981 C. Form Prepared by nameltitle Ruth Keenoy & Terri Foley organization Folev & Keenov date April 2.2008 street & number 5229 Oleatha Avenue telephone 314-353-7992 city or town St. Louis state MO zip code 63139 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. J&ZZSee continuation sheet J I Signature of certifying official Mark A. Miles/Deputy SHPO Date Misgouri Department of Natural Resources or Federal agency and bureau D I,hefeby, cert~fythat this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for l~stingin the National Register.
    [Show full text]