Field Investigation Report, Proposed Needles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Investigation Report, Proposed Needles .. ,·~.. ··' •' -- ............ -···•- ...... Field Inveat1gat1011 Report· Needles Area, Utah CONTENTS PAGE ·9 t t'.} .I :.?·.~ Swmnary Section - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - • - - • 1 Report Section - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - -· 4 Investigation Activities- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 Boundaries and Acreage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 Present Land OWners and Use - - - - - • • - - - - - - • 6 J·9 Bst1mated Land Values·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 : :LJ Possible Development - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - 7 Geologic Resume• ot the Beedles Salt Creek Area - - - - - - - - - 9 Biology ot the Needles Area- • - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - 11 Introduction - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 Vegetation - - - - -· - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - 12 Animals- - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - 15 Conclusions - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 Archeological Resume• ot the Needles - Salt Creek Area- - - - - - 17 . LI l I' II PIBLD IIVUTIGATIOM REPORT Proposed Needles lat1ol\al BeQreation Al'ea, Utah Septea~er 1959 A\Jgust 1960, revised u. s. Department ot the Interior National Park Service '. :, ~- J Region Three ,, ~ J : -i I I ···-··· ---· ,• .... -.~-- ... ...... .... - ··----- 1-~] \__] f .. ] ICHFIELO I ~ - 1Nl \-_] .,·1· J •I A N A VA J 0 Et I N C I N NAVA-.10 NA"''L.MO~ 0 N II I CANYON DE . NATCHELLY~1L. MON.· H 0 PI I N D I A N I 9=£. R V A T I 0 N .. IO 0 IO 20 40 60 SCALE IN MILES VICINITY MAP NEEDLES AREA l UTAH SUMMARY SECTION The Needles Country ot southe~stern Utah lies east and some­ wha~ south ot the Junction or the Green and Colorado Rivers in San Juan Countr. It ls .an area of spectacular sandstone formations sculptured by the forces of weathering into bizarre pinnacles, tins, and arches. Parallel faulting (grabens) has been a controlling factor in the erosional pattern forming literally a maze ot slit-like, sheer-walled canyons. The area is scenically and geologically of national s1gniticance. It seems certain that citizens .from all sections ot the United States wo~ld be impressed by the scenic grandeur ot the spectacular sandstone mmarets, fWChes and other forms ot rock sculpturing, including Druid, ] Angel and Castle Arches, and 1n the taulting, the uplift~ and the graben ] valleya caused by the displacement ot underlying saltbeds, and in the hues ot the tormat1ona ot red, rose, and pinlc contrasted with cream '] and butt tints. Other features extens~ve11 scattered throughout the area which would elicit visitation are the prehistoric Indian ruins and --~ . ] ~ writings which remain much as they were when abandoned 900 years ago by .] the ·Anasazi or "Ancient Ones". Examples are Tower Ruin and the All­ .American-Man Cave. /] 'l'he proposed area covers 75,200 acres and includes Salt Creek Canyon, Horse Can1on, Chesler and Virginia Parks, Chesler Canyon and '] Butler Wash. Generally, it is bound on the west and noJ;tth bJ the w1 th­ drawal tor the Glen canyon Project and on the south and east by the J township and section lines necessary to ettect1vely control the drainages ] I g~ -".·1 1 ot Salt 81'.id Horse Canyons, and Butler Wash. On the north a quarter town- ship' is included to permit access to Lost and Salt Canyons and to more ettectively control the logical entrance to the plateau upon which the main Beedles formations are located. J)omestic water and terrain suit­ ab~e tor a headquarters area also require the acquisition ot land in the northeast ·Corner ot the propose~ tract. Since the area is only partially surveyed the acreage is approximate. By assuming no:r-1 town .. ships and partial townships containing normal 640 acres per section, a total ot 75,200 is estiplated within the proposed area, Within the boundaries ot this proposed area are 11 surveyed State sections. The remainder is public domain. Most ot the proposed area is grazed bJ cattle (one grazier). The tiling ot mining claims and oil and gas leasing are important activities. Potable water is scarce. No active mining or oil and gas drilling operations exist at the present time. Roads are limited to low-grade unimproved Jeep trails. Much ot the mobility attained by Jeeps is 1n the various creek beds thereby limiting use to rain-tree periods. Pew. 1t BnJ structural improvements have been made with the exception ot dirt tanks or catchment basins to store water tor cattle and scattered drift fences to control their movement. TJ:lere are many stories which might be told about this area. I I MY and all ot the tollowing deser.ve interpretation: The formation ot I -, ! the arches. sp~es, sandstone bastions, and the canyons and cross-canyons (grabens) ; the history ot the area w1 th mining, graz 1ng, Butch Cass 1dy, so-called Moqui C1v111zat1on, and river-runners; and the stol'J' ot the . I j plant and animal associations • 2 The area might well be retained largely in its wild state, accessible tor Jeep, toot, and horse trails.· Stream bed trails should be allowed, as they are erased during the runoff season each year. Fuz:ther trails should_be justified as to need, mainly to disperse visitation. Roads.for standard motor vehicles might provide access to a·portion of the area. Desirable developments during the tirst tive years would include some improvement ot existing springs to facilitate the sanitary use ot available water tor·v1s1tors, the provision ot public sanitation facilities, 1mprovement of roads, a headquarters area .;, J development, personnel, vehicles, and miscellaneous supplies • .l 1 ] ] .J J .J If l REPORT SECTION • ~ 1 Invest18ation Activities .. a I The study ot .the Needles area was coordinated between the Region Three Ortice·and the Supe~intendent of Arches and Natural .•. n 1 . _,.,- ~ridges National Monuments and occupied the period May 1'·21J 1959. The study group consisted ot the following: Assistant Regional Director, Harthon L. Bill; Regional Chief, Recreation Resource Planning Division, •.a I William L. Bowen; Regional Chief, National Park System Planning Branch, Leslie P. Arnberger; Park Landsoape Architect, Urban E. Rogers; Re­ .... , creation Planner Paul v. Wykert (all ot the Regio~ Three Office in . Santa Fe); and Superintendent Bates Wilson and Supervisory Park Ranger Lloyd Pierson ot Arches National Monument. There were other partici­ r-"' ' pants tor varied portions ot the trip. Monticello-based Jeep tour operator Kent Froat ut111Zed two or his vehicles and transported Salt Lake Tribune photographer Frank Jensen and Utah State Park and Recreation Commission Field Supervisor Albert Albertson during five days of the area investigation. Two days .ot the study were spent in company with three Bureau ot Land Management representatives. They were State Land Officer Evan Rasmussen_ot Salt Lake City and Land Examiner Abijah Cook, and Range Manager Nick Cozakos ot Monticello, Utah. '!'he tr1~ through the ~eedles area was by Universal Jeeps. Camps were established at s1.x locations and many stops and side trips were made to inspect the mult1tUde·.ot interesting features including ruins, pictographs, arches, side canyons, and mesas. Many ot the 4 Ii - . ·· i features we~e reached by short hikes including Druid AI-ch, the confluence j. -- t ot the Green and Colorado Rivers, Angel Arch, ·upper Salt Creek above the Jump (an abrupt erosive feature forming.a waterfall and preventing vehicular access) incl~ding All-American-Man Cave and numerous cliff and surface ruins and writings, Clett Arch and side canyons 1n Lavender 1 : Canyon drainage.and numerous ruins 1n Beet Basin and Ruin Park. ··~ :··....... I Boundaries and Acreage The south line of the suggested boundary ot the proposed j .-, I ··-~ area departs from the Glen Canyon withdrawal on the township line be- ··1 tween T. 31 and T. '2 s., and proc~eds tor eleven miles east along this ...... line. Thus, one ot two natural entry ways into the Needles Area will .,1 \ i be controlled, this being the corridor between Pappys Pasture and ~- 4 Bobbys Hole which provides access to the area trom the south. In order :] to include the middle portion of the West Fork ot Salt Creek, two sections (land 12) are included in 'l'. 32 s., R. 19 B. The northwest quarter ot T. 32 s., R. 20 E., includes ~iusselman Arch, portions ot I t i . I both the west and east forks or Salt Creek, several arches and numerous ... -· pre-historic ruins, This area also contains above-ground water and "'·,_:···1 " .. sufficient level terrain tor possible future development, The east .··-·1 line runs north on subdivision lines generally on or near the hydro­ .. static divide between Salt and Horse Canyons watershed and the Davis ] ·Canyon watershed. The proposed boundary then veers tor over one mile to the west and then continues north three miles, thence three miles "] west -and ties 1n to· the Glen Canyon withdrawal again 1n the lower part of Squaw Flat. The quarter townships in T. 30 S. , R. 20 E. and T. 30 S,, R.19 E., include the 3unct1on ot Salt Creek with the access road :1 5 ) I ] ] t'X'om the east, thus providing protective control over the Horse and ] Salt Canyons above this junction. Cave· and Squaw Springs are also included as well as th~ logical site tor a headquarters development, .J The Elephant Hill natural barrier is largely controlled from the southeast quarter ot T, 30 s., R. 19 E. This would provide a second ·1 control and contact point for visitors traveling into the main Needles area. l Thus, a total of approximately 75,200 acres is proposed ,:_ l which is 16 miles by 12 miles at the points ot greatest size. Present Land owners and Use ~l The proposed addition is entirely 1n public ownership. Ot ,-1 the estimated 75,200 acres, 8,000 acres are State ot Utah lands consist~ ing ot eleven school sections. Most ot these school sections were l surveyed 1n 1957 or later. The entire area is grazed under permit trom the Bureau ot Land Management, The permit allows 100 cows from June l l through October 15 and 100 cows trom November 15 through May 30 each year -1 1n Salt Creek and Horse Canyon.
Recommended publications
  • Evolution of a Highly Dilatant Fault Zone in the Grabens of Canyonlands
    Solid Earth, 6, 839–855, 2015 www.solid-earth.net/6/839/2015/ doi:10.5194/se-6-839-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Evolution of a highly dilatant fault zone in the grabens of Canyonlands National Park, Utah, USA – integrating fieldwork, ground-penetrating radar and airborne imagery analysis M. Kettermann1, C. Grützner2,a, H. W. van Gent1,b, J. L. Urai1, K. Reicherter2, and J. Mertens1,c 1Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics Energy and Mineral Resources Group, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstraße 4–20, 52056 Aachen, Germany 2Neotectonics and Natural Hazards, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstraße 4–20, 52056 Aachen, Germany anow at: COMET; Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK bnow at: Shell Global Solutions International, Rijswijk, the Netherlands cnow at: ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Correspondence to: M. Kettermann ([email protected]) Received: 20 February 2015 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 17 March 2015 Revised: 18 June 2015 – Accepted: 22 June 2015 – Published: 21 July 2015 Abstract. The grabens of Canyonlands National Park are 1 Introduction a young and active system of sub-parallel, arcuate grabens, whose evolution is the result of salt movement in the sub- Understanding the structure of dilatant fractures in normal surface and a slight regional tilt of the faulted strata. We fault zones is important for many applications in geoscience. present results of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys Reservoirs for hydrocarbons, geothermal energy and fresh- in combination with field observations and analysis of high- water often contain dilatant fractures (e.g., Ehrenberg and resolution airborne imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Canyonlands Research Bibliography Canyonlands Research Center 2002 Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior Canyonlands National Park Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and Canyonlands National Park, "Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah" (2002). Canyonlands Research Bibliography. Paper 226. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research/226 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Canyonlands Research Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canyonlands Research Bibliography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MIDDLE SALT CREEK CANYON ACCESS PLAN CANYONLANDS NATIONAL PARK, UTAH _______________________________________________________________________ Summary Salt Creek is the largest drainage in the Needles district of Canyonlands National Park. The creek supports one of the most important riparian ecosystems in the park. It is also the heart of the Salt Creek National Register Archeological District, the area with the highest recorded density of archeological sites in the park. A tributary canyon contains the spectacular Angel Arch, a well-known geologic formation that for many years has been a destination point for park visitors. In 1998 the U.S. District Court for the State of Utah ruled, in a lawsuit filed by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, that the National Park Service violated the NPS Organic Act (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Manti-La Sal National Forest Visitor Guide
    anti-La Sal National Forest M VISITOR GUIDE Ancient Lands Modern Get-away Dark Canyon Wilderness La Sal Pass Maple Canyon (© Jason Stevens) he deep sandstone canyons, mountaintops, meadows, lakes and streams of the Manti-La Sal National Forest have What’s Inside T beckoned people for ages. Evidence of prehistoric and historic Get to Know Us .................... 2 life is found throughout the four islands of the forest. From Wilderness ........................... 3 the Abajos and La Sals in southeastern Utah to the Wasatch Scenic Byways ..................... 4 Plateau and Sanpitch Mountains hundreds of miles away in Map ...................................... 6 Campgrounds ..................... 10 central Utah, the diverse and scenic landscapes are rich with Cabins ................................. 11 fossils, cliff dwellings, historic waterways, and old mines. Activities ............................. 12 Know Before You Go........... 15 Today the forest offers people Contact Information ........... 16 Fast Forest Facts a retreat from the hurry of modern life. Those who seek solitude and Acres: 1.4 million quiet can find it here. Intrepid adventurers Mining: Source of 85% of coal mined will discover mountains to scale, trails to in Utah; important source of uranium explore, waters to fish, and woods where in the 1940s-1970s they can hunt. Scenic byways and backways Aberts Amazing Feature: Forest habitat summon motorists looking for stunning vistas, squirrel provides for the densest black bear and abundant camping areas are perfect for and
    [Show full text]
  • Canyonlands National Park
    Unpaved Overlook/ Rapids Boat launch Self-guiding trail Drinking water 2-wheel-drive road Paved road Ranger station Campground Drink one gallon of water per person per Unpaved Trail Locked gate Picnic area Primitive campsite day in this semi-desert 4-wheel-drive road environment. Horseshore Canyon Unit to 70 Moab to 70 and Green River Island in the Sky Visitor Center to 70 30mi 49mi 48km North 79km 45mi ARCHES NATIONAL PARK 73km 191 Visitor L Center A B Moab Y Moab to Areas in the Park R via SR 313 128 0 1 5 Kilometers BOWKNOT I Island in the Sky Visitor Center 32mi/51km N Needles Visitor Center 76mi/121km BEND T N Horseshoe Canyon Unit via I-70 101mi/162km 0 1 5 Miles O H Y 313 Horseshoe Canyon Unit via State 24 119mi/191km N 279 A Hans Flat 133mi/74km C T N G N Moab D I I E O R T Information A A N D P I M N O Center A R O P L L N E L Y O H A MOAB N R 4025ft A E Petroglyphs 1227m C N I Canyonlands M National Park The Headquarters Knoll C A N Y O N G N O L 191 N N Y O Y O N A N Pucker Pass A k C C ree L C A E E R I N O M H ier S arr BIG FLAT Moab to Monticello E B 53mi S Mineral Bottom rail) 85km thief T R (Horse Potash O T R Road I N H U Mineral P O P E F S H I DEAD HORSE POINT E T R S Potash H O STATE PA RK W O N L N Visitor Center O O Horseshoe Y Y Canyon N Unit to 24 A N C RED SEA 32mi Moses and A T A Y L O R FLAT Road C 51km Zeus S Potash F 5920ft C H E Island in the Sky A A I C 1804m N F A Y ER H N Visitor Center O Dead Horse Point Overlook R T B Y N Anticline E U U O 5680ft E S PH N Overlook Upheaval EA C 1731m D R VAL K A il No river access along this 5745ft O S Tra Gooseneck Great Gallery Bottom M E afer portion of Potash Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Eolian and Alluvial Response to Paleoclimate, Canyonlands, Southeastern Utah
    Late Quaternary eolian and alluvial response to paleoclimate, Canyonlands, southeastern Utah Marith C. Reheis† Richard L. Reynolds Harland Goldstein U.S. Geological Survey, MS-980, Federal Center, Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA Helen M. Roberts Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Wales, UK James C. Yount U.S. Geological Survey, MS-980, Federal Center, Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA Yarrow Axford Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA Linda Scott Cummings Paleo Research Institute, 2675 Youngfi eld Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA Nancy Shearin Bureau of Land Management, Monticello Field Offi ce, Monticello, Utah 84535, USA ABSTRACT began at ca. 6 ka and ended by ca. 3–2 ka, fol- sheets and dunes are common features of semi- lowed by a shift to drier modern conditions; arid regions, and their deposits and intercalated In upland areas of Canyonlands National localized mobilization of dune sand has per- paleosols potentially contain a long-term record Park, Utah, thin deposits and paleosols show sisted to the present. These interpretations of landscape response to climate fl uctuations. late Quaternary episodes of eolian sedimen- are similar to those of studies at the Chaco Mineral dust may strongly infl uence land- tation, pedogenesis, and climate change. dune fi eld, New Mexico, and the Tusayan scapes and ecosystems by adding materials to Interpretation of the stratigraphy and opti- dune fi eld, Arizona, and are consistent with soils that change their properties (e.g., Reheis cally stimulated luminescence ages of eolian paleoclimate interpretations of pollen and et al., 1995; Simonson, 1995; Herrmann et al., and nearby alluvial deposits, their pollen, packrat middens in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Institution
    JPOCUMMIT IESORN DD 160 $32 AUTHOR Lohman, S. V. TITLE The Geologic Story of Canyorlandi National Park. Geological Survey Bulletin 1327. INSTITUTION. Department of the Interior Washington, E.C. PUB DATE 74 NOTE 112p.; Contai isnumerous,colored photcgraEhls which will not reproduce yell AVAILABLE FRa Superintendent of Docements, U S. Government Printing Office, Washington, E.C. 204 2 (Stock Rueter 2401-02498; $2.65) 'EDRS PRICE HF-$0.83 Plus Postage. HC' Not Available from EDRS. DESC IPTbRS *Ancient History; Earth Science; Environmental Education; *Evolution; *Geology; Natural Besoarce *Parks; *Resource Materials; *Science Education; Trails NTIFIERS *Canyonlands National Park ABSTRACT In 1984 Canyonlands was established as tte 32nd U.S. national park, covering 400 square miles at the junction cf the Green and Colorado Livers in Utah. This booklet gives the early history cf the 'area, a summary pf the geologic histcrof the park, and a description of the high mesas.benchlands, and canyons. 'There are 81 illustrations including maps, charts, and pfictografhs of the Canyonlands. Additional readings and selected references are included. (MA) ** ,** ****************** ** *** ***** *** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. t********************** **************************** *** Li V S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION AWELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT FT*5 BEEN REPRO- '01./C ED E.ACTL1 AS RECEIVED FROM` THE_ FF./SON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN- ATING, IT POINTS OF ,V1EVV OW OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECE LILY FEIRE SENT OF F !Cults STilkiTE OF EDUCATION POSITION OL,CY it, LOOKING NORTH FROM EAST WALL OF DEVILS LANE, just south of the ever Stairs. Needles are Cedar Mesa Sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 the Newsletter of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
    RReeddRRoocckk WILDERNESSWILDERNESS The Newsletter of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance Volume 32,34, Number 1 • Spring 20152017 Anti-Wilderness Overreach and the Rise of the Utah Resistance Page 2 Redrock Wilderness Cover Photo: Angel Arch, one of several natural arches in supremely scenic Arch Canyon—an area newly protected by the designation of Bears Ears National Monument. Photo copyright Scott T. Smith The mission of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) is the preservation of the out- standing wilderness at the heart of the Colorado Plateau, and the management of these lands in Staff their natural state for the benefit of all Americans. Steve Bloch, Legal Director SUWA promotes local and national recognition of Ray Bloxham, Wildlands Field Director the region’s unique character through research and Joe Bushyhead, Staff Attorney public education; supports both administrative and Neal Clark, Wildlands Program Director legislative initiatives to permanently protect Colorado Clayton Daughenbaugh, Midwest Field Organizer Plateau wild places within the National Park and National Wilderness Preservation Systems or by Karin Duncker, Associate Director other protective designations where appropriate; Michelle Farnsworth, Membership Coordinator builds support for such initiatives on both the local Jordan Giaconia, Legislative Advocate and national level; and provides leadership within the Scott Groene, Executive Director conservation movement through uncompromising Mathew Gross, Media Director advocacy for wilderness preservation. Travis Hammill, Eastern Grassroots Organizer SUWA is qualified as a non-profit organization Luke Henry, Wildlands Field Advocate under section 501(c)(3) of the federal tax code. Diane Kelly, Communications Specialist Therefore, all contributions to SUWA are tax- Kya Marienfeld, Wildlands Field Advocate deductible to the extent allowed by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document • Canyonlands National Park
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Canyonlands National Park Utah August 2013 Foundation Document Unpaved Trail Boat launch Primitive campsite 2-wheel-drive road Ranger station Drinking water Unpaved Rapids Picnic area Drink one gallon of water per 4-wheel-drive road person per day in this semi- Self-guiding trail desert environment. Overlook/ Locked gate Campground Canyonlands National Park Paved road Horseshore Canyon Unit to 70 Moab to 70 and Green River Island in the Sky Visitor Center to 70 30mi 49mi 48km North 79km 45mi ARCHES NATIONAL PARK 73km 191 Visitor L Center A B Moab Y R Moab to Areas in the Park 128 0 1 5 Kilometers BOWKNOT I Island in the Sky Visitor Center via SR 313 32mi/51km N Needles Visitor Center 76mi/121km BEND T N 0 1 5 Miles O Horseshoe Canyon Unit via I-70 101mi/162km H Y 313 N Horseshoe Canyon Unit via State 24 119mi/191km 279 A C Hans Flat 133mi/74km T G N N Moab D I I E A O R T Information A N D P I M A N O Horsethief Center R O P no L L water N E L Y O H A MOAB N R 4025ft A E Petroglyphs 1227m C N I Canyonlands M National Park The Headquarters Knoll C A N Y O N G N L O 191 O N O N N Y N Y Pucker Pass A C A C eek Cr L R A E E O I N M H ier S arr BIG FLAT Moab to Monticello E B 53mi S Mineral Bottom Trail) 85km R Potash O R l Road (Horsethief N T H Minera O I U P P F I E S T H DEAD HORSE POINT S E O R Potash H STATE PA RK W O N L N Visitor Center O O Horseshoe Y Y Canyon N A N Unit to 24 C RED SEA A 32mi Moses and T A Y L O R FLAT Road C 51km Zeus SHAFER Potash F 5920ft
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resource Evaluation Report, Canyonlands National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Canyonlands National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2005/003 Canyonlands National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2005/003 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 September 2005 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters. Views and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect policies of the National Park Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geologic Map of the Loop and Druid Arch Quadrangles
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MAP MF–2411 109 52 30 109 50 00 109 47 30 109 45 00 38 15 00 38 15 00 Po Pc *e CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS Qae Pc Pcu Qed Qs Qr Qae SURFICIAL DEPOSITS *e Pcu Qae *e Qf1/Qr *e Qaf Qs Qfp Qr Qp Qed Qes Qrf Qt1 Qf1 Qf2 Qae Qal Qt2 Holocene QUATERNARY Qfp *h Qt3 Pleistocene Qr Qr Pc *e Qes SEDIMENTARY ROCKS 10 Qae Qed Unconformity *e 50 Qr Po Po Pc PERMIAN Pc Pcu Pc Qr Qs Qed *e Upper Qae Pennsylvanian *e Unconformity *h Qae Pcu PENNSYLVANIAN Qr Qae *h Middle and Upper Qae Pennsylvanian Qf1/Qr *e Qae Pc Qr *e Qes Qae DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS Qal Alluvial deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene?)—Gray, light-red, and Qae 45 *h [Units shown with slashes indicate thin deposits of the first unit over the second and sometimes light-brown clay, silt, sand, and interbedded lenses of pebble-size third unit. Not all composite units are shown. Some unit exposures on the plotted map are too gravel; partly consolidated. Unit intertongues with or is *h small to distinguish the color for unit identification. These units are labeled where possible, Qae Qr Qae and unlabled units are attributed in the database] overlapped by intermediate (Qt2) or old alluvial terrace (Qt3) Qed deposits. Common in low-gradient valleys in The Grabens area *e *h Qes SURFICIAL DEPOSITS and within narrow tributary drainages of Salt Creek and other Qed/Qae Surficial deposits are differentiated from one another chiefly on the basis of unnamed canyon drainages.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Utah Politicos Fuel Sagebrush Rebellion Page 2 Page 2 Redrock
    RREDREDROOCKCK WWIILLDDEERRNNEESSSS The Newsletter of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance Volume 31, Number 2 • Summer 2014 Utah Politicos Fuel Sagebrush Rebellion Page 2 Redrock Wilderness Cover Photo: Angel Arch and Molar Rock in Salt Creek Canyon, Canyonlands National Park. A recent court ruling denied a state and county right-of-way claim in the Salt Creek streambed, keeping the canyon free of motorized vehicles. Photo copyright Tom Till (www.tomtill.com). The mission of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) is the preservation of the out - standing wilderness at the heart of the Colorado Plateau, and the management of these lands in Staff their natural state for the benefit of all Americans. Steve Bloch , Legal Director SUWA promotes local and national recognition of Ray Bloxham , Utah Field Director the region’s unique character through research and Rachel Briggs , Eastern Grassroots Organizer public education; supports both administrative and Joe Bushyhead , Staff Attorney legislative initiatives to permanently protect Colorado Neal Clark , Field Attorney Plateau wild places within the National Park and National Wilderness Preservation Systems or by Clayton Daughenbaugh , Midwest Field Organizer other protective designations where appropriate; Michelle Farnsworth , Membership Coordinator builds support for such initiatives on both the local David Garbett , Staff Counsel and national level; and provides leadership within the Scott Groene , Executive Director conservation movement through uncompromising Mathew Gross , Media Director advocacy for wilderness preservation. Diane Kelly , Communications Specialist SUWA is qualified as a non-profit organization Terri Martin , Western Regional Organizer under section 501(c)(3) of the federal tax code. Creed Murdock , GIS Analyst Therefore, all contributions to SUWA are tax- Landon Newell , Staff Attorney deductible to the extent allowed by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Canyonlands U.S
    National Park Service Canyonlands U.S. Department of the Interior Canyonlands National Park Eine Wildnis aus Felsgestein Canyonlands, inmitten des Colorado Plateau gelegen, natürliche, unberührte, wüstenhafte Landschaften, wobei umfasst eine riesige Wildnis aus Fels und Stein. Wasser und jeder Distrikt seine eigene, besondere Schönheit aufweist. das Gesetz der Schwerkraft waren die Hauptarchitekten dieser Landschaft und schufen aus fl achen, sedimentären Als der Canyonlands National Park im Jahre 1964 gegründet Felsschichten hunderte von farbigen Canyons, Tafelberge, wurde, war die abgelegene Landschaft noch weitgehend Steinsäulen und-bögen sowie Steinhügel und Felstürmchen. unbekannt. Nur prähistorische Indianer, Cowboys, Forscher auf Flussbooten oder Uranschürfer wagten sich Im Herzen dieser Landschaft befi nden sich zwei grosse früher in dieses rauhe, im südöstlichen Utah gelegene Canyons, welche durch den Green und Colorado Fluss Gebiet. Noch immer sind weite Teile von Canyonlands geformt wurden. unberührt. Die meisten Strassen sind nicht asphaltiert, bei den Wegen handelt es sich um einfache Pfade, und die Diese Flüsse sind von weiten, sehr unterschiedlichen Flüsse bahnen sich ihren natürlichen Weg. Landschaften umgeben—im Norden befi ndet sich der Island in the Sky-[Insel im Himmel], im Westen der Maze- Dickhornschafe, Kojoten und andere einheimische [Irrgarten] und im Osten der Needles-Distrikt [Nadeln]. Tiere leben in diesem 848 km2 grossen Nationalpark. Bei allen drei Gebieten handelt es sich grösstenteils um Canyonlands—das bedeutet noch wildes Amerika. Island in the Sky (Insel im Himmel) Von Island in the Sky reichen die Ausblicke von den Tiefen des Green und Colorado Flusses bis zu den hohen Bergspitzen. Sie gehen von Canyon zu Canyon die sich bis in den Horizont erstrecken.
    [Show full text]