Late Quaternary Eolian and Alluvial Response to Paleoclimate, Canyonlands, Southeastern Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Late Quaternary Eolian and Alluvial Response to Paleoclimate, Canyonlands, Southeastern Utah Late Quaternary eolian and alluvial response to paleoclimate, Canyonlands, southeastern Utah Marith C. Reheis† Richard L. Reynolds Harland Goldstein U.S. Geological Survey, MS-980, Federal Center, Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA Helen M. Roberts Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Wales, UK James C. Yount U.S. Geological Survey, MS-980, Federal Center, Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA Yarrow Axford Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA Linda Scott Cummings Paleo Research Institute, 2675 Youngfi eld Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA Nancy Shearin Bureau of Land Management, Monticello Field Offi ce, Monticello, Utah 84535, USA ABSTRACT began at ca. 6 ka and ended by ca. 3–2 ka, fol- sheets and dunes are common features of semi- lowed by a shift to drier modern conditions; arid regions, and their deposits and intercalated In upland areas of Canyonlands National localized mobilization of dune sand has per- paleosols potentially contain a long-term record Park, Utah, thin deposits and paleosols show sisted to the present. These interpretations of landscape response to climate fl uctuations. late Quaternary episodes of eolian sedimen- are similar to those of studies at the Chaco Mineral dust may strongly infl uence land- tation, pedogenesis, and climate change. dune fi eld, New Mexico, and the Tusayan scapes and ecosystems by adding materials to Interpretation of the stratigraphy and opti- dune fi eld, Arizona, and are consistent with soils that change their properties (e.g., Reheis cally stimulated luminescence ages of eolian paleoclimate interpretations of pollen and et al., 1995; Simonson, 1995; Herrmann et al., and nearby alluvial deposits, their pollen, packrat middens in the region. 1996). Dust incorporated into aridic soils affects and intercalated paleosols yields the follow- A period of rapid deposition and infi ltra- water-infi ltration rates, the evolution and stabil- ing history: (1) Eolian deposition at ca. 46 ka, tion of eolian dust derived from distant igne- ity of desert surfaces, the distribution of surface followed by several episodes of alluviation ous source terranes occurred between ca. 12 and subsurface water (McFadden et al., 1987, from some time before ca. 40 ka until after and 8 ka. Before ca. 17 ka, and apparently 1998; McDonald et al., 1996), and relations 16 ka (calibrated). (2) Eolian deposition from back to at least 45 ka, paleosols contain little among eolian dust, distribution of plants and ca. 17 ka to 12 ka, interrupted by periods of or no such infi ltrated dust. After ca. 8 ka, soil crust, rain-water runoff, and productivity pedogenesis, coinciding with late Pleistocene either the supply of dust was reduced or the (McFadden and McAuliffe, 1997; Shachak and alluviation as local climate became warmer more arid climate inhibited translocation of Lovett, 1998; Belnap et al., 2000; Reynolds et and wetter. (3) A wetter period from 12 to dust into the soils. al., 2001). 8.5 ka corresponding to the peak of summer The Canyonlands physiographic section of monsoon infl uence, during which soils formed Keywords: Colorado Plateau, dunes, eolian the Colorado Plateau (Fig. 1) is characterized by relatively quickly by infi ltration of eolian silt dust, paleoclimate, paleosols, soil nutrients. high-elevation (1500–2200 m) benches, mesas, and clay, and trees and grasses were more and slickrock buttes of resistant sandstone. These abundant. (4) A drier period between ca. 8.5 INTRODUCTION landforms, in many cases isolated from alluvial and 6 ka during which sheetwash deposits and colluvial sedimentation, are commonly accumulated and more desertlike vegetation Semiarid and arid regions of the world react mantled by a thin layer of fi ne-grained sandy was dominant; some dunes were reactivated sensitively to climate change. Indicators of sediment supporting upland grass and shrub at ca. 8 ka. (5) Episodic eolian and fl uvial environmental change commonly used in stud- steppe. Active wind transport of sand occurs deposition during a wetter, cooler period that ies of these areas include lacustrine deposits, in areas of abundant sand supply and where pollen from stratigraphic sequences, and plant vegetation has been disturbed by land use. Lay- †E-mail: [email protected]. macrofossils from packrat middens. Eolian sand ers of locally derived eolian sand separated by GSA Bulletin; July/August 2005; v. 117; no. 7/8; p. 1051–1069; doi: 10.1130/B25631.1; 10 fi gures; 4 tables; Data Repository item 2005106. For permission to copy, contact [email protected] © 2005 Geological Society of America 1051 REHEIS et al. paleosols in small relict dune fi elds indicate late Quaternary changes in land-surface stability. WA In this paper, we discuss the depositional MT OR history, age, and paleoclimate setting of eolian ID Arches and alluvial deposits and intercalated paleosols WY National at fi ve sites in the area of Canyonlands National NV UT CO Park Park, Utah. The relatively thin deposits of eolian CA sand preserve a nearly 50 k.y. record of alternat- Colorado River Tusayan Chaco ing periods of deposition and stability. In com- dunes ISKY dunes NM bination with pollen contained in these deposits, AZ dune Moab La Sal Colorado ' these records provide new insights on the late Plateau Mountains 30 N Quaternary landscape stability and paleoclimate 8 of the Colorado Plateau. In addition, textural 3 Green River and magnetic data record episodic additions of far-traveled infi ltrated dust in surface and buried Canyonlands, soils, with ecologic implications for modern National ecosystem dynamics in this area. Park STUDY SITES AND METHODS Hamburger Rock The Canyonlands area of the Colorado Pla- Indian Creek Salt Creek teau is cool and semiarid. At the Needles visitor center (Fig. 1), intermediate in location and alti- Needles tude (1523 m) between four of our sites, mean area annual precipitation is 21 cm (38 yr record), and 00'N mean January and July temperatures are –1.9 °C Colorado River Abajo 38 and 25.8 °C, respectively (National Climatic Mtns. Data Center, http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/ 0 20 km Monticello climsum.html). The Neck station in the Island in the Sky district is 14 km from the northern 110 00 'W 109 30 'W study site (ISKY dune) and at the same altitude (1807 m). Precipitation and temperature ranges Figure 1. Maps of Canyonlands area and locations of study sites (“Needles area” includes are similar to The Needles despite the difference Virginia Park and graben-fi ll sites). Inset, location of Canyonlands area (black box) within in altitude. In both areas, ~40% of precipitation the Colorado Plateau and nearby dune fi elds. Mtns.—Mountains. falls during late July to October, the remainder being about equally distributed through the year; prevailing winds are from the west. area of sandy sheetwash alluvium in search of the Abajo Mountains (Fig. 1). The modern Study Sites subsurface archaeological features. As part of sediment transported by Salt Creek includes this study, Shearin et al. (2000) described and fi ne to medium volcanic gravel from the Abajo Virginia Park, the focus of most of our work sampled surface and buried soils and analyzed Mountains and sand derived locally from the (Fig. 1), is a sheltered basin of vegetated, sta- pollen samples from the sediment. Cedar Mesa Sandstone. We studied fi ve terrace bilized sand dunes bordered on three sides by The ISKY site is a quarry in a partially active surfaces fl anking Salt Creek (Fig. 4). vertical sandstone cliffs, and on the fourth by clifftop dune containing paleosols on the east- a canyon (Fig. 2, Table 1). Dune ridges rise as ern edge of the plateau between the Green and Sampling and Description much as 5 m above intervening swales. Auger Colorado Rivers (Figs. 1 and 3A; Table 1). The holes indicate the sand is at least 4 m thick, Quaternary dune sand is probably derived from Within Canyonlands National Park, strati- thinning to zero at the margins. Modern vegeta- erosion of the nearby Navajo Sandstone (Hunt- graphic descriptions and samples were primar- tion includes abundant grasses and shrubs and oon et al., 1982). The graben-fi ll site (Figs. 2 ily obtained with a soil auger, supplemented by scattered trees in bedrock and cliff-marginal and 3B; Table 1) east of Virginia Park contains natural exposures of dune sand and alluvium locations (Table 1; M. Miller, U.S. Geological deposits within a closed depression formed by in arroyo cuts and by two shallow hand-dug Survey, personal commun., 1998). Small drain- faulting due to fl ow of underlying salt beds soil pits (VP-1, VP-2; Fig. 2) in a dune crest ages dissect the Quaternary sediment within westward toward the Colorado River (Fig. 1; and a dune swale. Outside the boundary of the the basin and locally provide exposures of the Hunt, 1969; Walsh and Schultz-Ela, 2003). park, samples were collected from backhoe stratigraphy. Later incision by Chesler Canyon has created pits at Hamburger Rock (Fig. 1; Shearin et al., The Hamburger Rock site (Fig. 1, Table 1) has a near-vertical cut exposing more than 6 m of 2000) and from a 9-m-thick section of dune a thin sheet of Quaternary eolian sand, including slightly gravelly, poorly sorted, silty sand with sands and paleosols exposed by the quarry active coppice dunes overlying shale. The Bureau interbedded paleosols (Fig. 3B). at ISKY dune. Most of the outcrops and soil of Land Management excavated trenches in the Salt Creek is an intermittently fl owing pits were described (Table 2) following Birke- sand and underlying bedrock and in an adjacent tributary of the Colorado River that heads in land (1999). The soil-auger sequences were 1052 Geological Society of America Bulletin, July/August 2005 EOLIAN AND ALLUVIAL RESPONSE TO PALEOCLIMATE 601500 602000 9U-22 8U-13 8U-14 8U-11 00U-27 8U-10 9U-23 VP-2 0 VP-1 8U-12 421670 109 o 52'W 109 o 51' 109 o 50' 38 07'N o Graben fill (9U-21) THE 38 06' o Topographic contour, 1730 10-m interval NEEDLES Supplemental 2.5-m topographic contour Sample site 100 m 4216200 Figure 2.
Recommended publications
  • Dolores River Restoration Partnership: a Private/Public Collaboration Dolores River Restoration Partnership
    DOLORES RIVER RESTORATION PARTNERSHIP: A PRIVATE/PUBLIC COLLABORATION DOLORES RIVER RESTORATION PARTNERSHIP • TIMELINE OF PARTNERSHIP • VISION AND GOALS OF PARTNERSHIP • WHY HAS THE DRRP BEEN SUCH A SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIP? • WHY THIS PARTNERSHIP HAS BEEN IMPORTANT TO THE BLM ORIGINS AND HISTORY OF DRRP • INITIAL RIPARIAN WORK ON SAN MIGUEL RIVER IN EARLY 2000’S – LED BY TNC, PRECURSOR TO THE DRRP. • 2009 – TNC AWARDED CONTRACT TO TAMARISK COALITION TO DEVELOP A STRATEGY FOR THE DOLORES RIVER (DR-RAP) • 2010 - DR-RAP FINALIZED • 2010 - FIRST MOU SIGNED • 2010 – FIRST BLM ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT • 2012 – AGO BLUE RIVERS DESIGNATION • 2015 – TRANSITION PLAN FINALIZED • 2015 – DOLORES RIVER HEALTHY LANDS FOCAL AREA • 2015 – SECOND MOU SIGNED • 2016 – SECOND BLM ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT DOLORES RIVER RESTORATION ACTION PLAN (DR-RAP) 1. IDENTIFIED A VISION: “A THRIVING DOLORES RIVER SYSTEM THAT IS ECOLOGICALLY, SOCIALLY, AND ECONOMICALLY SUSTAINABLE IN A MULTIUSE CONTEXT.” “A DOLORES RIVER WATERSHED DOMINATED BY NATIVE VEGETATION, WHERE THE THREATS FROM TAMARISK AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INVASIVE SPECIES HAVE BEEN MITIGATED AND THE RIPARIAN AREAS OF THE WATERSHED CONTINUE TO BECOME MORE NATURALLY FUNCTIONING, SELF-SUSTAINING, DIVERSE, AND RESILIENT OVER TIME.” DRRP MANAGEMENT GOALS Significantly increase the number of sustainable, healthy riparian plant Ecologic communities while reducing those dominated by tamarisk and other invasive, non-native plant species. Develop a professional, competitive, and efficient work force; improve Social aesthetic enjoyment;
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Processes and Evolution
    GEOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND EVOLUTION J.W. HEAD1, R. GREELEY2, M.P. GOLOMBEK3, W.K. HARTMANN4, E. HAUBER5, R. JAUMANN5, P. MASSON6, G. NEUKUM5, L.E. NYQUIST7 and M.H. CARR8 1Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 USA 2Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA 4Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85705 USA 5DLR Institute of Space Sensor Technology and Planetary Exploration, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12484 Berlin-Aldershof, Germany 6University of Paris-Sud, 91405, Orsay Cedex France 7Johnson Space Center, Houston TX 77058 USA 8US Geological Survey, Branch of Astrogeological Studies, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA Received:14 February 2001; accepted:12 March 2001 Abstract. Geological mapping and establishment of stratigraphic relationships provides an overview of geological processes operating on Mars and how they have varied in time and space. Impact craters and basins shaped the crust in earliest history and as their importance declined, evidence of extensive regional volcanism emerged during the Late Noachian. Regional volcanism characterized the Early Hesperian and subsequent to that time, volcanism was largely centered at Tharsis and Elysium, con- tinuing until the recent geological past. The Tharsis region appears to have been largely constructed by the Late Noachian, and represents a series of tectonic and volcanic centers. Globally distributed structural features representing contraction characterize the middle Hesperian. Water-related pro- cesses involve the formation of valley networks in the Late Noachian and into the Hesperian, an ice sheet at the south pole in the middle Hesperian, and outflow channels and possible standing bodies of water in the northern lowlands in the Late Hesperian and into the Amazonian.
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's Mighty Five from Salt Lake City
    Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City (8 days) Explore five breathtaking national parks: Arches, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, Bryce Canyon & Zion, also known as Utah's Mighty 5. You’ll get a chance to explore them all on this 8-day guided tour in southern Utah. Join a small group of no more than 14 guests and a private guide on this adventure. Hiking, scenic viewpoints, local eateries, hidden gems, and other fantastic experiences await! Dates October 03 - October 10, 2021 October 10 - October 17, 2021 October 17 - October 24, 2021 October 24 - October 31, 2021 October 31 - November 07, 2021 November 07 - November 14, 2021 November 14 - November 21, 2021 November 21 - November 28, 2021 November 28 - December 05, 2021 December 05 - December 12, 2021 December 12 - December 19, 2021 December 19 - December 26, 2021 December 26 - January 02, 2022 Highlights Small Group Tour 5 National Parks Salt Lake City Hiking Photography Beautiful Scenery Professional Tour Guide Comfortable Transportation 7 Nights Hotel Accommodations 7 Breakfasts, 6 Lunches, 2 Dinners Park Entrance Fees Taxes & Fees Itinerary Day 1: Arrival in Salt Lake City, Utah 1 / 3 Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City Arrive at the Salt Lake Airport and transfer to the hotel on own by hotel shuttle. The rest of the day is free to explore on your own. Day 2: Canyonlands National Park Depart Salt Lake City, UT at 7:00 am and travel to Canyonlands National Park. Hike to Mesa Arch for an up-close view of one of the most photographed arches in the Southwestern US.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of a Highly Dilatant Fault Zone in the Grabens of Canyonlands
    Solid Earth, 6, 839–855, 2015 www.solid-earth.net/6/839/2015/ doi:10.5194/se-6-839-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Evolution of a highly dilatant fault zone in the grabens of Canyonlands National Park, Utah, USA – integrating fieldwork, ground-penetrating radar and airborne imagery analysis M. Kettermann1, C. Grützner2,a, H. W. van Gent1,b, J. L. Urai1, K. Reicherter2, and J. Mertens1,c 1Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics Energy and Mineral Resources Group, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstraße 4–20, 52056 Aachen, Germany 2Neotectonics and Natural Hazards, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstraße 4–20, 52056 Aachen, Germany anow at: COMET; Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK bnow at: Shell Global Solutions International, Rijswijk, the Netherlands cnow at: ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Correspondence to: M. Kettermann ([email protected]) Received: 20 February 2015 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 17 March 2015 Revised: 18 June 2015 – Accepted: 22 June 2015 – Published: 21 July 2015 Abstract. The grabens of Canyonlands National Park are 1 Introduction a young and active system of sub-parallel, arcuate grabens, whose evolution is the result of salt movement in the sub- Understanding the structure of dilatant fractures in normal surface and a slight regional tilt of the faulted strata. We fault zones is important for many applications in geoscience. present results of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys Reservoirs for hydrocarbons, geothermal energy and fresh- in combination with field observations and analysis of high- water often contain dilatant fractures (e.g., Ehrenberg and resolution airborne imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 12B-01. Mountainous Volcanic Region
    108°W 106°W F Ancestral ron t Rang LARIMER Uinta Sand Upl e ift Little Snake River Wash Ba North Platte River MOFFAT s Yampa River in JACKSON Park-Gore Range Axial ROUTT Ba s in Up li h ft rc as A ek e Dougl Cr White River GRAND 40°N Whi EXPLANATION RIO BLANCO 40°N te Ri Neogene Volcanics ver Upli Neogene Sediments ft Paleogene Volcanics Eagle River Blue River Paleocene-Cretaceous Intrusives Piceance Basin Roaring ForkCentral River Colorado TroughEAGLE Cretaceous Seaway Sediment GARFIELD Eagle River Sawatch Range Aquifers SUMMIT Mesozoic Sediment Aquifers Ancestral Rockies Basins Colorado River Precambrian Basement PITKIN Arkansas River East Muddy Creek Mountainous Region MESA LAKE PARK Unc Mountainous Valleys ompa ghre Up Colorado Plateaus Region lif DELTA t Laramide Basin Outlines Laramide Uplift Axis Uncompaghre Uplift G un Taylor River CHAFFEE nison Laramide Basin Axis GUNNISON Upl Ancestral Rockies Uplift Axis Uncompahgre River South Arkansas River ift Ancestral Rockies Basin Axis Paradox Basin FREMONT MONTROSE San Lui CUSTER s OURAY Up San Miguel River li ft 38°N SAN MIGUEL SAGUACHE 38°N Animas River HINSDALE DOLORES SAN JUAN Rio Grande MINERAL ag Dolores River n S West Dolores River ua J RIO GRANDE ALAMOSA e San MONTEZUMA n Dom Jua Archuleta Anticlinorium San Los Pinos River LA PLATA COSTILLA San Juan Piedra River Basin CONEJOS Tusas Uplift COSTILLA ARCHULETA COSTILLA 108°W 106°W 0 10 20 30 40 50 Miles Geology modified from Tweto (1979); structural features from Hemborg (1996). 0 10 20 30 40 50 Kilometers Figure 12b-01.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison River
    final environmental statement wild and scenic river study september 1979 GUNNISON RIVER COLORADO SPECIAL NOTE This environmental statement was initiated by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (BOR) and the Colorado Department of Natural Resources in January, 1976. On January 30, 1978, a reorganization within the U.S. Department of the Interior resulted in BOR being restructured and renamed the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service (HCRS). On March 27, 1978, study responsibility was transferred from HCRS to the National Park Service. The draft environmental statement was prepared by HCRS and cleared by the U.S. Department of the Interior prior to March 27, 1978. Final revisions and publication of both the draft environmental statement, as well as this document have been the responstbility of the National Park Service. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT GUNNISON WILD AND SCENIC RIVER STUDY Prepared by United States Department of the Interior I National Park Service in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources represented by the Water Conservation Board staff Director National Par!< Service SUMMARY ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Department of the Interior, National Park Service 1. Type of action: ( ) Administrative (X) Legislative 2. Brief description of action: The Gunnison Wild and Scenic River Study recommends inclusion of a 26-mile (41.8-km) segment of the Gunnison River, Colorado, and 12,900 acres (S,200 ha) of adjacent land to be classified as wild in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System under the administration of the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. D. I. This river segment extends from the upstream boundary of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument to approximately 1 mile (1.6 km) below the confluence with the Smith Fork.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolores River Desert Bighorn Sheep Herd (DBS-61) Executive Summary
    Dolores River Desert Bighorn Sheep Herd (DBS-61) Executive Summary GMUs: S-63 (Middle Dolores River) and S-64 (Upper Dolores River) Tier Status: Tier 1 Land Ownership: BLM 45%, Private 29%, USFS 24%, State 2%, 2018 Posthunt Population Estimate: 175 Average Length of Longest Horn (harvested rams): 31 “ Posthunt Population Estimate 300 Dolores River Herd 250 200 150 100 50 0 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Proposed Objective S63 S64 Dolores Herd Figure 1. DBS-61 posthunt population estimate 1987-2019. Background and Issue Summary: The Dolores River Desert Bighorn sheep herd (DBS-61) is located in southwest Colorado and occupies the canyon country of the Dolores River, and its tributaries, downstream of McPhee Reservoir. It consists of Game Management Units (GMUs) S-63 (Middle Dolores River) and S-64 (Upper Dolores River). The majority of the occupied bighorn habitat occurs on lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). DBS-61 is a Tier 1 bighorn population and should be given the highest priority for inventory, habitat protection and improvement, disease prevention and research. Although bighorn sheep were likely indigenous, none were present in the past century. The current population was established beginning in 1986 with the release of 25 bighorn from Arizona. There have been a total of four transplants of desert bighorn into the Dolores Canyon. Population sources have been from Arizona (source for two transplants), Nevada, and Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary U.S
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DRAFT Executive Summary U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region National Park Service, Intermountain Region December 2015 Cover photo credits: Title bar: Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam: T.R. Reeve High-flow experimental release: T.R. Reeve Fisherman: T. Gunn Humpback chub: Arizona Game and Fish Department Rafters: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 CONTENTS 2 3 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. vii 5 6 ES.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 7 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ........................................................................................ 2 8 ES.2.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .............................................................. 2 9 ES.2.2 Objectives and Resource Goals of the LTEMP ....................................... 3 10 ES.3 Scope of the DEIS .................................................................................................. 6 11 ES.3.1 Affected Region and Resources .............................................................. 6 12 ES.3.2 Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 6 13 ES.4
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Base Flow of the Colorado River: Its Importance in Sustaining Perennial Flow in Northern Arizona And
    1 * This paper is under review for publication in Hydrogeology Journal as well as a chapter in my soon to be published 2 master’s thesis. 3 4 Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and 5 southern Utah 6 7 Riley K. Swanson1* 8 Abraham E. Springer1 9 David K. Kreamer2 10 Benjamin W. Tobin3 11 Denielle M. Perry1 12 13 1. School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, US 14 email: [email protected] 15 2. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, US 16 3. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, US 17 *corresponding author 18 19 Abstract 20 Water in the Colorado River is known to be a highly over-allocated resource, yet decision makers fail to consider, in 21 their management efforts, one of the most important contributions to the existing water in the river, groundwater. This 22 failure may result from the contrasting results of base flow studies conducted on the amount of streamflow into the 23 Colorado River sourced from groundwater. Some studies rule out the significance of groundwater contribution, while 24 other studies show groundwater contributing the majority flow to the river. This study uses new and extant 1 25 instrumented data (not indirect methods) to quantify the base flow contribution to surface flow and highlight the 26 overlooked, substantial portion of groundwater. Ten remote sub-basins of the Colorado Plateau in southern Utah and 27 northern Arizona were examined in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah History Encyclopedia
    ARCHES NATIONAL PARK Double Arch Although there are arches and natural bridges found all over the world, these natural phenomena nowhere are found in such profusion as they are in Arches National Park, located in Grand County, Utah, north of the town of Moab. The Colorado River forms the southern boundary of the park, and the LaSal Mountains are visible from most viewpoints inside the park`s boundaries. The park is situated in the middle of the Colorado Plateau, a vast area of deep canyons and prominent mountain ranges that also includes Canyonlands National Park, Colorado National Monument, Natural Bridges National Monument, and Dinosaur National Monument. The Colorado Plateau is covered with layers of Jurassic-era sandstones; the type most prevalent within the Park is called Entrada Sandstone, a type that lends itself to the arch cutting that gives the park its name. Arches National Park covers more than 73,000 acres, or about 114 square miles. There are more than 500 arches found inside the park′s boundaries, and the possibility exists that even more may be discovered. The concentration of arches within the park is the result of the angular topography, much exposed bare rock, and erosion on a major scale. In such an arid area - annual precipitation is about 8.5 inches per year - it is not surprising that the agent of most erosion is wind and frost. Flora and fauna in the park and its immediate surrounding area are mainly desert adaptations, except in the canyon bottoms and along the Colorado River, where a riverine or riparian environment is found.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Options~
    14848 Seven Oaks Lane Draper, UT 84020 1-888-517-EPIC [email protected] APMA Annual Scientific Meeting (The National) ~Tour Options~ Zion National Park 1 Day Tour 6-10am Depart Salt Lake City and travel to Zion 10am-5pm Zion National Park We will leave Springdale and head in to the park and enjoy our first hike together up to Emerald Pools. This mild warm up is a beautiful loop trail that will take us along a single track trail, past waterfalls and pools of cool blue water all nesting beneath the massive monolith cliffs of Zion. Afterward we will drive up canyon and walk two trails known as the Riverwalk and Big Bend. The Virgin River, descending from the upper plateau, has worked its way over time through the sandstone carving out the main Zion corridor. You’ll be amazed by the stunning views as we walk along the river. Following these hikes, we will stop for lunch at the Zion Lodge which sits in the park. After lunch, we will drive to the eastern side of the park and through the Carmel Tunnel which was carved out of the solid cliff face in the 1920’s. We will start first at Checkerboard Mesa where you can explore the massive sandstone monoliths. Lastly, we walk along the Overlook Trail until we reach the stunning viewpoint overlooking the entire canyon. 5-6pm Dinner 6-10pm Travel to Salt Lake City Arches National Park 1 Day Tour 6-10am Travel from Salt Lake City to Arches National 10am-5pm Arches National Park In Arches National Park, we begin at the Wall Street trail head.
    [Show full text]