DOCSLIB.ORG

Anders Behring Breiviks Radikaliseringsproces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anders Behring Breiviks Radikaliseringsproces Anders Behring Breiviks radikaliseringsproces Roskilde Universitet, HAB A, 46.2 Jeppe Stender Hornstrup Gruppenummer: V1724810256 62928 Vejleder: Chris Holmsted Larsen Maria Louise Skov Larsen 62874 Semesterprojekt Efterår 2017 Julie Nagel Ebstrup Antal anslag: 105128 62952 Dato: 18. december 2017 Emma Victoria Hegnar 62696 Christina Mai Simonsen 62734 0 Abstract The purpose of this project is to examine the radicalization process of Anders Behring Breivik. This project includes the psychological aspect by referring to the upbringing as well as the societal development in Oslo, Norway. By examining these we analyzed and discussed which of the perspectives have had the most influential impact on Breiviks radicalization process. To approach the two perspectives we analyzed the psychological aspect by focusing on neglect as well as the life psychology of Breivik. Furthermore we analyzed the societal developments in Oslo politically as well as demographic differences. We made a comparison between the two perspectives to clarify which of the two have been the most influential on Breiviks radicalization process. According to the examination both of them have had an impact on the radicalization process. Norway has experienced an increase in immigration after the second World War which have resulted in an even greater multicultural development. This societal development has resulted in Breiviks disapproval of the society and extreme far right political opinions opposing the multiculturalism. Based on the SSBU reports the psychological examination has shown that neglect has led to Breivik having difficulties in maintaining relationships and accepting other perspectives than his own. Based on the analysis and discussion we have concluded that both perspectives have been crucial. However the psychological aspect has been the main factor in Breiviks radicalization process leading him to performing the terror attack on the 22th of July 2011. Indholdsfortegnelse INDLEDNING ................................................................................................................................................................1 PROBLEMFELT .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 PROBLEMFORMULERING: .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 DIMENSIONSFORANKRING ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 OBS ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 AFGRÆNSNING ..........................................................................................................................................................3 METODE .........................................................................................................................................................................4 EMPIRI ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 En af os af Åsne Seierstad ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 KILDEKRITIKK .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 En av oss av Åsne Seierstad ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Anders Behring Breiviks manifest ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Vitenskapelige artikler ................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Litterære verker ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Avisartikler og Media .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 BEGREBSAFKLARING .............................................................................................................................................9 RADIKALISERING ......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 LONE WOLF ................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 LONE WOLF RADIKALISERINGSMODEL .............................................................................................................................. 10 HØJREEKSTREMISME ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 FUNDAMENTALISME ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 TERRORISME .............................................................................................................................................................................. 13 ISLAMOFOBI ............................................................................................................................................................................... 14 TEORI ........................................................................................................................................................................... 15 OMSORGSSVIGT ........................................................................................................................................................................ 15 Vanrøgt ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Psykiske overgreb ......................................................................................................................................................................... 15 TILVÆRELSESPSYKOLOGI ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 Aarhus-modellen ........................................................................................................................................................................... 18 OSLOS DEMOGRAFI OG DISKURSER ..................................................................................................................................... 18 REDEGØRELSE ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 INNVANDRING TIL NORGE OG OSLO................................................................................................................................... 20 NORGES POLITIKK .................................................................................................................................................................... 22 ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIKS “IDEOLOGI” ........................................................................................................................ 23 AUF som terrormål ...................................................................................................................................................................... 24 ANALYSE .................................................................................................................................................................... 26 PSYKOLOGISKE KONSEKVENSER AF ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIKS BARNDOM ...................................................... 26 ONDSKAB SET I FORBINDELSE MED ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIK .............................................................................. 29 Breiviks brug af kristendommen i sit manifest .................................................................................................................. 32 BREIVIKS BRUG AF INTERNETTET ........................................................................................................................................ 33 Radikaliseringsprocessen .......................................................................................................................................................... 33 Fjordman .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Udbredelse af sit budskab ........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JUDGMENT Given 18 October 2019 by the Supreme Court Composed of Justice Magnus Matningsdal Justice Wilhelm Matheson Justice
    JUDGMENT given 18 October 2019 by the Supreme Court composed of Justice Magnus Matningsdal Justice Wilhelm Matheson Justice Ragnhild Noer Justice Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen Justice Kine Steinsvik HR-2019-1929-A (sak nr. 19-029021SIV-HRET) Appeal against Gulating Court of Appeal’s judgment 2 January 2019 Propiedades Rott SL (Counsel Leif Inge Håland) v. Trond Lie Nilsen (Counsel Finn Eide) (1) Justice Arntzen: The case concerns financial settlement after the cancellation of an agreement for purchase of a flat in Spain. (2) In the spring 2014, Trond Lie Nilsen entered into an agreement with Propiedades Rott SL (hereafter referred to as Propiedades) for purchase of a flat in a planned building project in Villajoyosa, Spain. Propiedades is a company registered in Spain engaging in property development directed to the Norwegian market, among others. Ninety percent of the shares in the company are owned by Valor AS, which in turn is owned by the Norwegian Terje Rott and his family who have residence in Norway. Nilsen is a Norwegian citizen with residence in Norway. He bought the flat for private use. (3) On 7 March 2014, the parties signed a “binding purchase confirmation”. The purchase confirmation was written in Norwegian and signed in Norway. The purchase price was EUR 660 000 with the addition of 10 percent Spanish VAT (IVA). Upon signing, Nilsen transferred a “deposit” of EUR 11 000 to the seller’s Spanish bank account. (4) The agreement was revised twice in 2015, latest by a “binding purchase agreement” signed 25 September 2015 in Spain. The seller’s deadline for having the flat ready for takeover was set to 1 June 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Awaiting Breivik's Verdict
    (Periodicals postage paid in Seattle, WA) TIME-DATED MATERIAL — DO NOT DELAY Taste of Norway Roots & Connections Sound Spirits Barneblad: Aquavit: Gode venner er engler som løfter Fun with balloons oss opp igjen når våre vinger har That’s the spirit! glemt hvordan det er å fly. for kids of all ages Read more on page 8 – Nils Bredesen Read more on page 10 Norwegian American Weekly Vol. 123 No. 26 June 29, 2012 Established May 17, 1889 • Formerly Western Viking and Nordisk Tidende $1.50 per copy Norway.com News Find more at www.norway.com Awaiting Breivik’s verdict News The recent Oil Fund move to July 22 trial ends buy property based from tax haven Luxembourg is under fire after 10 weeks from Norwegian-born French corruption hunter Eva Joly. “I of emotionally cannot understand how it’s pos- charged sible to set up a branch of the Oil Fund in a tax haven. It should testimonies be prohibited,” said a shocked Joly to Klassekampen. NOK STAFF COMPILATION 6.6 billion (almost USD 1.1 Norwegian American Weekly billion) was invested in compa- nies registered in tax havens the “The funeral gave me moti- Cayman Islands, Jersey, Guern- sey, and Luxembourg last year. vation. The multicultural Norway Answering Eva Joly’s censure, I’m so proud of. It showed that he Labor (Ap) Deputy Minister of failed. And we must be proud of it. Finance Hilde Singsaas stated Bano did not die in vain. She died there is nothing unusual about for the multicultural Norway.” establishing a property fund in Lara Rashid was one of the Luxembourg when investing in five witnesses to testify on the last more than one country.
    [Show full text]
  • One of Us: the Story of a Massacre and Its Aftermath Free
    FREE ONE OF US: THE STORY OF A MASSACRE AND ITS AFTERMATH PDF Asne Seierstad,Sarah Death | 544 pages | 03 May 2015 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9781844089208 | English | London, United Kingdom One of Us: The Story of Anders Breivik and the Massacre in Norway - Åsne Seierstad - Google книги It is a ghastly story of family dysfunction, professional and sexual failure, grotesque narcissism and the temptation of apocalyptic delusions. Breivik grew up in an expensive area in Oslo. But his home life must have been miserable from the start. His father, a diplomat, disappeared more or less completely from his life. And One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath mother was a depressive, self-destructive woman who thought of sending her boy and his sister to an orphanage. Attempts to join groups or make friends almost always ended in humiliation. He made up for his social failures by dreaming of personal grandeur. He did have one childhood friend, called Ahmed, the son of Pakistani immigrants. Norwegian kids laughed at these pretensions; Ahmed moved away. After finishing high school, Breivik tried various schemes to make One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath money, such as selling advertising space by telephone, and failed. He later succeeded for a while by peddling fake university diplomas on the internet, but this too ran into the sand when he was in danger of being exposed. At one point, joining the Freemasons seemed an attractive way to cut a figure in a secret society, but after being introduced to a lodge by a relative, Breivik got bored and never attended.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-22 Instans Oslo Tingrett - Beslutning
    Utskrift fra Lovdata - 10.03.2015 10:44 Oslo tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-22 Instans Oslo tingrett - Beslutning. Dato 2012-06-08 Publisert TOSLO-2011-188627-22 Stikkord 22. juli-saken. Sammendrag Rettens beslutning om kringkasting av vitne. Domstolloven § 131a. Saksgang Oslo tingrett TOSLO-2011-188627-22 (11-188627MED- OTIR/05). Parter Den offentlige påtalemyndighet (statsadvokat Svein Holden, statsadvokat Inga Bejer Engh) mot A (advokat Geir Lippestad, advokat Vibeke Hein Bæra, advokat Tord Eskild Kvinge Jordet, advokatfullmektig Odd Ivar Aursnes Grøn). Forfatter Tingrettsdommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, tingrettsdommer Arne Lyng. Meddommere: Ernst Henning Eielsen, Diana Patricia Fynbo, Anne Elisabeth Wisløff. 8. juni - Rettens beslutning om kringkasting av vitnet Malt: Retten legger til grunn at vitnets gjenstående forklaring vil omhandle alternative fortolkninger av de observasjoner de sakkyndige har redegjort for i sine rapporter. Dette kan kaste lys over om tiltalte var psykotisk 22. juli 2011, og den privatengasjerte sakkyndige kan forklare seg om dette selv om det samtidig innebærer vurdering av alternative diagnoser. De alternative diagnosene synes behandlet i de sakkyndiges rapporter, i hvert fall i rapporten fra Tørrissen og Aspaas. Retten har ikke fått overlevert det notatet vitnet benytter under sin forklaring, og som partene har fått tilsendt. Retten anser vitnet som en privatengasjert sakkyndig etter straffeprosessloven § 149. Og som privatengasjert sakkyndig har han fremlagt en kopi av foilene i sin powerpointpresentasjon, som er å anse som et hjelpedokument for retten som kan sammenlignes med en disposisjon. Etter rettens mening vil kringkasting ikke få uheldig virkning for behandling av saken og den vil heller ikke medføre en urimelig belastning for tiltalte.
    [Show full text]
  • Breivik's Sanity: Historical and Contemporary Right-Wing Political Violence in Norway Colin Jacobsen
    Florida State University Libraries Honors Theses The Division of Undergraduate Studies 2013 Breivik's Sanity: Historical and Contemporary Right-Wing Political Violence in Norway Colin Jacobsen Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE BREIVIK’S SANITY: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY RIGHT-WING POLITICAL VIOLENCE IN NORWAY By COLIN JACOBSEN A Thesis submitted to the College of Criminology and Criminal Justice in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2013 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Colin Jacobsen defended on April 18, 2013. ______________________________ Daniel Maier-Katkin Thesis Director ______________________________ Sumner B. Twiss Outside Committee Member ______________________________ Terry Coonan Committee Member ______________________________ Nathan Stoltzfus Committee Member ii Acknowledgements I am sincerely grateful and humble for the help, insight, guidance and support I have been fortunate to receive through a challenging, memorable, and rewarding research journey, for without this I could not have established a final piece which has been greatly invigorated and transcended by the many I worked with. I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to my mentor and Thesis Director Professor Daniel Maier-Katkin, who has through exceptional guidance and pedagogy revealed to me new avenues of learning, fascinating advice on the life of the mind, and inspired me to aspire towards excellent writing and articulation; his expertise and guidance has undeniably steered me on to path of academic success that already carries an impact on to my future career prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalistien Eettiset Ongelmat Ja Ratkaisut Anders Breivikin Oikeudenkäynnissä
    ”Evil Demystified With Civility” – journalistien eettiset ongelmat ja ratkaisut Anders Breivikin oikeudenkäynnissä Samuli Sivonen Journalistiikan pro gradu -tutkielma Kevät 2016 Viestintätieteiden laitos Jyväskylän yliopisto JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO Tiedekunta – Faculty Laitos – Department HUMANISTINEN Viestintätieteiden Tekijä – Author Samuli Sivonen Työn nimi – Title ”Evil Demystified With Civility” – journalistien eettiset ongelmat ja ratkaisut Anders Breivikin oikeudenkäynnissä Oppiaine – Subject Työn laji – Level Journalistiikka Pro Gradu -tutkielma Aika – Month and year Sivumäärä – Number of pages Maaliskuu 2016 105 Tiivistelmä – Abstract Heinäkuussa 2011 Norjaa kohtasi pohjoismaiden historian pahin terrori-isku, kun Anders Behring Breivik tappoi 77 ihmistä. Seuraavana vuonna Oslon käräjäoikeudessa käytiin oikeudenkäynti, jossa Breivikiä syytettiin terroriteoista ja harkituista murhista. Oikeudenkäynnistä muodostui valtava mediatapahtuma, johon osallistuivat sadat mediaorganisaatiot ja toimittajat. Monien mukaan tämä tarjosi Breivikille juuri sen, mitä tämä oli halunnutkin: julkisen foorumin, jossa hän voisi jakaa äärioikeistolaista propagandaansa. Tässä tutkielmassa tarkastellaan sitä, millaisia eettisiä ongelmia Anders Breivikin oikeudenkäynti tuotti journalisteille, ja miten journalistit selviytyivät näistä ongelmista. Tutkittava aineisto koostuu Helsingin Sanomien, New York Timesin ja The Guardian kirjoituksista aikavälillä 9.4.–29.8. 2012. Kaikkiaan aineisto koostuu 142 tekstistä, joita tarkastellaan sekä määrällisesti että laadullisesti.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-18 Instans Oslo Tingrett - Beslutning
    Utskrift fra Lovdata - 10.03.2015 10:47 Oslo tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-18 Instans Oslo tingrett - Beslutning. Dato 2012-05-29 Publisert TOSLO-2011-188627-18 Stikkord 22. juli-saken. Straffeprosessloven § 93c annet ledd, domstolloven § 131a første ledd. Sammendrag Beslutning om omgjøring av presse og publikums adgang til overføringssalene. Saksgang Oslo tingrett TOSLO-2011-188627-18 (11-188627MED- OTIR/05). Parter Den offentlige påtalemyndighet (statsadvokat Svein Holden, statsadvokat Inga Bejer Engh) mot A (advokat Geir Lippestad, advokat Vibeke Hein Bæra, advokat Tord Eskild Kvinge Jordet, advokatfullmektig Odd Ivar Aursnes Grøn). Forfatter Tingrettsdommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, tingrettsdommer Arne Lyng. Meddommere: Ernst Henning Eielsen, Diana Patricia Fynbo, Anne Elisabeth Wisløff. Retten fattet den 30. mars 2012 (TOSLO-2011-188627-5) beslutning om overføring av hovedforhandlingen til tilstøtende saler i Oslo tingrett, Grand hotell i Oslo samt tingrettene i Nord-Troms, Salten tingrett, Alta, Inn- Trøndelag, Sør-Trøndelag, Sunnmøre, Bergen, Haugaland, Jæren, Kristiansand, Nedre Telemark, Tønsberg, Drammen, Ringerike, Fredrikstad, Nordmøre og Hedemarken. Samme dag fattet retten en generell beslutning om at presse og publikum ikke har adgang til disse overføringslokalene, men at de følger saken fra egne lokaler. Retten la til grunn at det er fare for at fornærmede og etterlatte blir fortrengt dersom overføringslokalene åpnes for presse og publikum. Den 18. april (TOSLO-2011-188627-12) omgjorde retten beslutningen, slik at overføringslokalene utenfor Oslo ble åpnet for presse og publikum under behandlingen av bombeeksplosjonen i regjeringskvartalet (24. til 30. april). Retten viste til at det i denne perioden var grunn til å tro at det ville være ledige plasser i disse lokalene.
    [Show full text]
  • Moren” – Den Ansvarlige
    Rune Fardal, studerer psykologi Personlighetsforstyrrelser med hovedvekt på narsissistisk problematikk i relasjon til barn http://www.sakkyndig.com mail: [email protected] “Moren” – den ansvarlige 15 Noveber, 2013, Oppdatert 15.11.2013 Åsne Seierstad har skrevet en interesant bok ”En av oss” om Anders Behring Breivik og hendelsene på Utøya i 2011. Boken offentliggjør en rekke interessante opplysninger om Wenche B. Breivik, Anders B. Breivik, hans halvsøster Elisabeth og samspillet mellom disse og delvis hans far Jens B. Breivik. Den adferd vi ser beskrevet fremstår som prototypen på en mor med en borderline personlighetsruktur slik vi ser det typisk hos borderline og narsissistisk forstyrrede personligheter. Beskrivelsene fra morens barndom og hennes egen mors psykiske lidelse, samt fraværet av en farsfigur er typiske for årsaksforklaring rundt denne typen personligheter. Morens fokus på det ytre fasaden gjør at dette heller mest mot at hun har utviklet en narsissistisk forstyrrelse. En typisk borderline vil ikke ha et så stort fokus på fasade som narsissistisk forstyrresle. Disse 2 forstyrrelser har flere like trekk, men skiller seg på narsissistens grandiositet og borderlinerens usatbilitet. Med et slikt utgangspunkt der moren har en narsissitisk forstyrrelse, der Anders blir hennes narsissistiske supply og fraværet av en farsfigur som kunne korrigert for dette, blir det fortåelig at Anders har utviklet den personlighet hans adferd fremviser. Morens oppvekst i skam er projisert på Anders, mormors sviktende fungering ble projisert må Wenche som alltid fikk høre at hun ikke mestret og fikk ansvaret for alt som var galt. Dette viderebringer så Wenche gjennom projekjson på både Anders og Elisabeth. 1 Anders søken etter å lykkes i arbeidsliv svikter gang på gang, hans fungering med kvinner svikter, hans savn etter faren er tydelig, hans søken etter å lykkes blir som for narsissister en besettelse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of Norway - Judgment - HR-2019-1929-A
    Utskrift fra Lovdata - 15.01.2021 15:26 The Supreme Court of Norway - Judgment - HR-2019-1929-A Authority The Supreme Court of Norway – Judgment Date 2019-10-18 Published HR-2019-1929-A Keywords International private law. Choice of law. Real estate in Spain. The Lugano Convention. Rome I. Summary A Norwegian private individual residing in Spain had entered into an agreement with a Spanish company with Norwegian owners regarding the purchase of a flat in Spain. When the buyer later wanted to terminate the agreement, a termination agreement was entered into under which the buyer was to pay damages. The settlement of claim was brought before Norwegian courts, which had decided with a legally binding effect that it had jurisdiction to hear the case, see Article 15 (1) (c) of the Lugano Convention. In the choice of law issue, the Supreme Court found that the dispute was to be resolved under Norwegian and not Spanish law. There was no basis for letting the purchase agreement determine the choice of law. Separate assessments of the two agreements were not in conflict with Article 12 in Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council – Rome I. Since the termination agreement was a consumer agreement, the Regulation's Article 6 (1) indicated review under Norwegian law. The consideration of international uniformity of the law strongly suggested compliance with the choice of law rule under EU law. It was also emphasised that the case was closely connected to Norway, because, among other things, the seller directed its business towards the Norwegian market.
    [Show full text]
  • Anders Breivik Klagt Vor Menschenrechtsgerichtshof Der Massenmörder Wehrt Sich Gegen Seine Isolationshaft, Die Er Als Erniedrigend Und Inhuman Empfindet
    Update Dossier Norwegen vs. Anders Breivik / Utøya und Folgen: Gedenken an Terroropfer in Norwegen und München 22.07.2021, 23:29 Updates Norwegen vs. Anders Breivik Dossier Norwegen vs. Anders Breivik Hier finden Sie eine ständig aktualisierte Artikelsammlung über den Tathergang, sowie Hintergrund- und Augenzeugenberichte zu den Attentaten in Oslo und Utoya und den Prozess in Oslo. Wenn etwas Neues hinzukommt, wird die Sammlung mit entsprechenden Hinweisen am Ende des Inhaltsverzeichnisses erneut gepostet. 1 / 209 Update Dossier Norwegen vs. Anders Breivik / Utøya und Folgen: Gedenken an Terroropfer in Norwegen und München 22.07.2021, 23:29 Minutenprotokolle 22.-27.7.11 / Tageszusammenfassungen Welt OL Minutenprotokoll Freitag , 22.07.2011 Der Tag, als der Terror über Norwegen kam Volltext-Quelle Notruf der Jugendlichen von Utoya wurde abgewiesen Es war ein tragisches Missverständnis: Als die ersten Jugendlichen den Notruf wählten, wurden sie abgewiesen. Erst nach 90 Minuten erreichte die Polizei die Insel. Volltext-Quelle Minutenprotokoll Samstag , 23.07.2011 Anders Breivik legt erstes Geständnis ab Volltext-Quelle Minutenprotokoll Sonntag, 24.07.2011 "Anschläge waren grausam, aber notwendig" Volltext-Quelle 2 / 209 Update Dossier Norwegen vs. Anders Breivik / Utøya und Folgen: Gedenken an Terroropfer in Norwegen und München 22.07.2021, 23:29 Minutenprotokoll Montag , 25.07.2011 Breivik fiel Norwegens Geheimdienst schon im März auf Volltext-Quelle Minutenprotokoll Dienstag, 26.07.2011 Breivik stellt "unmögliche" Forderungen an Polizei Volltext-Quelle Berner Zeitung, 27. Juli 2011 Minutenprotokoll Mittwoch, 27.07.2011 Post vom Attentäter Volltext-Quelle Norwegen nach den Attentaten in Bildern von Big Picture zur Bildstecke (total 32 Fotos) SF, 29. Juli 2011 Breivik wird erneut vernommen - EU zieht 3 / 209 Update Dossier Norwegen vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Tingrett – Dom. 22
    29.08.2012 1 Utskrift fra Lovdata Oslo tingrett – Dom. 22. juli-saken. Strafferett. Drap. Terror. Tilregnelighet. Forvaring. Straffeloven § 147a første ledd bokstav a og b, jf. straffeloven § 148 første ledd 1. straffalternativ og § 233 første og annet ledd, og § 233 første og annet ledd, jf. § 49, og straffeloven § 147a første ledd bokstav b, jf. § 233 første og annet ledd, og § 233 første og annet ledd, jf. § 49. Mann f. 1979 ble for to terrorhandlinger der blant annet 77 personer ble drept dømt til 21 års forvaring med en minstetid på 10 år. Tiltalte drepte 8 og skadet 9 personer alvorlig da han sprengte en bombe i Regjeringskvartalet i Oslo. Eksplosjonen forårsaket også omfattende materielle ødeleggelser. Samme dag drepte gjerningsmannen 69 personer på Utøya, flertallet av disse var deltakere på AUFs sommerleir. De fleste ble drept ved skyting eller som følge av skyting. I tillegg ble 33 ungdommer skadet. Foruten de fysiske skadene ble et stort antall personer påført psykiske lidelser. Tiltalte ble av retten funnet å være tilregnelig, dvs. ikke psykotisk, på gjerningstidspunktet. Han kunne dermed idømmes straff. Tiltalte erkjente å ha begått de faktiske handlingene han var tiltalt for, men erkjente seg ikke skyldig etter tiltalebeslutningen. (Sammendrag ved Lovdata.) Avsagt: 24.08.2012 i sak TOSLO-2011-188627-24 Saksgang: Oslo tingrett TOSLO–2011–188627–24 (11–188627MED–OTIR/05). Parter: Den offentlige påtalemyndighet (statsadvokat Svein Holden og statsadvokat Inga Bejer Engh) mot A (advokat Geir Lippestad, advokat Vibeke Hein Bæra, advokat Tord Eskild Kvinge Jordet og advokatfullmektig Odd Ivar Aursnes Grøn). Dommere: Rettens leder tingrettsdommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, fagdommer tingretts- dommer Arne Lyng.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 2 Contents
    SUPREME COURT OF NORWAY SUPREME COURT ANNUAL REPORT 2014 2 CONTENTS C O N T E N T S The Supreme Court in 2014 Page 4 Summary of Supreme Court cases and procedure Page 6 The Supreme Court in 1814 and 2014 Page 7 - Establishment and appointment of justices Page 8 - New justices continue the proud tradition Page 11 - The Supreme Court expands Page 12 Preparations for the Supreme Court's bicentenary celebration Page 15 A selection of cases from 2014 Page 16 Dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court Page 22 Conventions on human rights and the Supreme Court Page 24 The EEA agreement and the Supreme Court Page 26 Supreme Court justices Page 31 The Supreme Court's administration Page 34 Court Usher - what is that? Page 40 County Tour 2014 Page 42 Outside the courtroom Page 44 Statistics Page 46 Front page, the Supreme Court's visit to the millennium site at Gulating (Photo: Henrik Tveit) 3 THE SUPREME COURT IN 2014 In 2014 we celebrated the Norwegian Constitutional Bicentenary. The Constitution established the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, with judicial power vested in the Supreme Court and the subordinate courts. The Constitution is the foundation on which Norway, as a democracy based on the rule of law, was built. During its first fifty years as the supreme judicial power, the Supreme Court developed the basic framework of judicial review of the legislative and executive branches. All laws must conform with the limitations that follow from the Constitution. In the event of conflict, the Constitution prevails or the law must be interpreted restrictively, in order to eliminate the conflict.
    [Show full text]