DOCSLIB.ORG

Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Board

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Board CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (CCJPA) MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Wednesday, June 17, 2020 | 10 a.m. | Virtual Due to social distancing regulations in place, public participation will be via teleconference only. You may join the CCJPA Board Meeting via Zoom as follows: • Call 1-877-853-5257. • Enter access code 790 512 1598. You may watch the Board Meeting live at www.capitolcorridor.org/ccjpa-board. The full agenda packet, supplemental materials, and presentation materials will be available for download at www.capitolcorridor.org/ccjpa-board. You may submit a public comment via the following methods: 1) Submit written comments: • Send email to [email protected]. • Indicate “Public Comment” as the subject line. • Your comment will be read into the record and will become a permanent part of the file. • Please submit your comments as far in advance as possible. Emailed comments must be received before 9:00 a.m. on June 17, 2020 in order to be included in the record; or 2) Submit verbal comments: • Call 1-877-853-5257. • Enter access code 790 512 1598. • Dial *9 to raise your hand when you wish to speak. • Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes per person, per item. AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance III. Report of the Chair IV. Consent Calendar Action 1. Approve Minutes of the February 12, 2020 Meeting 2. Accept Award of Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) 3. Authorize Second Amendment to FY 2019-20 CCJPA/Amtrak Operating Agreement V. Action and Discussion Items 1. COVID-19 Update: Impact of and Responses to COVID-19 Info 2. Overview of Draft FY 2020-2021 CCJPA Budget (Amtrak Operating, Marketing, Info Information/Customer Support Services, and Administration) 3. Authorize Submittal of Application for the FY 2020 Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Action Safety Improvements (CRISI) Program to Support the Santa Clara Siding Project 4. Authorize Submittal of Applications for the 2020-2021 through 2024-2025 State Rail Action Assistance (SRA) Funding 5. Legislative Matters/Governor’s May Revise FY 2020-2021 State Budget Action 6. South Bay Connect Update - Environmental Phase Process Info 7. Capital Projects Update Info 8. Managing Director’s Report Info 9. Work Completed Info a. Annual Business Plan (FY 2020-2021 – FY 2021-2022) b. Richmond Lighting Project c. Capitol Corridor Station Access Study, Phase I d. Santa Clara Siding (10% Design) e. Marketing Activities (February 2020 – May 2020) 1 10. Work in Progress Info a. Onboard Wi-Fi Upgrade b. California Passenger Information Display System (CalPIDS) Modernization c. Davis Crossovers and Signal Replacement Project d. Renewable Diesel Pilot Program, Phase II e. Procurement of Door Panels for NorCal Surfliner Rail Cars f. New Transbay Rail Crossing (NTRC) g. Upcoming Marketing and Communications Activities VI. Board Director Reports VII. Public Comment VIII. Adjournment. Next Meeting Date: 10:00 a.m., September 16, 2020 Virtual Meeting or at Sacramento City Hall, Council Chambers, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 The CCJPA Board reserves the right to take action on any agenda item. Consent calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved, or adopted by one motion unless a request for discussion or explanation is received from a CCJPA Board Director or from a member of the audience. 2 Item IV.1 (Consent) CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY Regular Board Meeting Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors Minutes of the 116th Meeting February 12, 2020 The 116th meeting of the Board of Directors of the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA) was held at 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, February 12, 2020, via simultaneous teleconference at City Council Chambers, Suisun City Hall, 701 Civic Center Boulevard, City of Suisun City, California; Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, 299 Nevada Street, Auburn, California; San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, 1720 Market Street, San Francisco, California; Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, 3331 North First Street, San Jose, California; and Yolo County Board of Supervisors, 600 A Street, Suite B, Davis, California. Chair Saltzman presided; Patricia K. Williams, Recording Secretary. I. Call to Order. Chair Saltzman called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m. II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance. Directors present in City of Suisun City: Rebecca Saltzman, San Francisco Bay Area Transit District (BART); Debora Allen, BART; Kerri Howell, Sacramento Regional Transit District (SRTD); Steve Miller, SRTD, Harry Price, Solano Transportation Authority (STA); Robert Raburn, BART; Jim Spering, STA; and Elizabeth Ames, BART. Director present in San Francisco: Janice Li, BART. Director present in San Jose: Teresa O’Neill, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (SCVTA). Absent: Directors Jim Holmes, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) (alternate attended in stead) and John McPartland, BART (alternate attended in stead). Directors John Allard, PCTPA; Bevan Dufty, BART; Raul Peralez, SCVTA; and Cheryl Maki, PCTPA, entered the Meeting later. Directors Don Saylor, Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD), and Lucas Frerichs, YCTD, entered the Meeting in Davis. III. Report of the Chair. Chair Saltzman welcomed new Alternate Board Member Elizabeth Ames and Mr. Michael Jones, Deputy General Manager for BART; highlighted the Independent Audit; and requested that the Board Members read the Independent Audit report. IV. Consent Calendar. Director Spering moved adoption of Item IV.1, Minutes of the November 20, 2019 Meeting; Item IV.2, Resolution No. 20-1, In the Matter of Accepting Additional State Funds and Revising the Budget for the FY 2019-20 Wi-Fi Budget; Item IV.3, Resolution No. 20-2, In the Matter of Approving the Issuing a New Round of On-Call Consulting Services; Item IV.4, Resolution No. 20-3, In the Matter of the Use of Up to $140,000 for the Second Phase of CCJPA’s Service Optimization: Operations Study; Item IV.5, Resolution No. 20-4, In the Matter of Reprogramming Remaining Travel Time Savings Funds to the Santa Clara Siding 3 Project; and Item IV.6, Resolution No. 20-5, In the Matter of Entering Into Contracts with MobilityData IO for the Purposes of Supporting California Integrated Travel Project Software Develop for GTFS Adoption. Directors Miller and Price seconded the motions. Director Ames indicated that she would abstain from voting on Item IV.1, Minutes of the November 20, 2019 Meeting. Director Raburn commented that many of the Items included in the Consent Calendar were weighty issues involving large dollar amounts over a long period of time and that some of the Items deserved some discussion. Director Dufty entered the Meeting in San Francisco. The motions brought by Director Spering and seconded by Directors Miller and Price carried by unanimous roll call vote, with Director Ames abstaining from Item IV.1, Minutes of the November 20, 2019 Meeting. Ayes: 13 – Directors Saltzman, Saylor, Allen, Dufty, Frerichs, Howell, Li, Miller, O’Neill, Price, Raburn, Spering, and Ames. Noes: 0. Abstentions: 1 – Director Ames on Item IV.1 Only. Absent: 3 – Directors Allard, Peralez, and Maki. Directors Allard and Maki entered the Meeting in Auburn. V. Action and Discussion Items. 1. Annual Business Plan (Fiscal Year [FY] 2020-21 – FY 2021-22). Mr. Robert Padgette, Managing Director, presented the item, highlighting the state’s requirements for the Annual Business Plan; the April 1st deadline for submission of the Business Plan; receipt and submission of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation’ s (Amtrak®) final operating estimates to the state; a letter from the state that will be issued in July or early August regarding final funding for the CCJPA; staff’s presentation of CCJPA’s final funding to the Board for approval in September; overview of service level plans in the next two years; CCJPA’s staff’s forecast of changes in operating costs and the similarity between staff’s forecast and Amtrak’s final operating estimates; estimate of ridership and revenue increases; the decrease in the total funding request form the current year funding; outreach efforts in January to present the Business Plan and solicit feedback from customers on trains; and facilitating a Facebook Live event with customers to supplement the on-train efforts. Director Peralez entered the Meeting in San Jose. The Business Plan was discussed. Mike Barnbaum addressed the Board. Director Raburn moved adoption of Resolution No. 20-06, In the Matter of Approving the State Fiscal Year 2020-21 – FY 2021-22 Business Plan Update for the Capitol Corridor Service for the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority. Director Miller seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous roll call vote by the required two-thirds vote. Ayes: 16 – Directors Saltzman, Saylor, Allard, Allen, Dufty, Frerichs, Howell, Li, Miller, O’Neill, Peralez, Price, Raburn, Spering, Ames, and Maki. Noes: 0. 4 2. Legislative Matters/Governor’s Draft FY 20-21 Budget. Mr. Padgette presented the item, highlighting Senate Bill (SB) 278 and that SB 278 was the framework for the potential FASTER Bay Area legislative vehicle; Assembly Bill (AB) 2057 and that the purpose of the AB 2057 was to improve connections in the Bay Area; the federal re-authorization of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act; and the expiration of the current FAST Act legislation at the end of September. The item was discussed. 3. Bay Bridge Bus-Only Lane. Chair Saltzman presented the item, highlighting recent conversation regarding moving forward with a resolution such as the presented Resolution; Assemblymember Rob Bonta’s work on legislation; building support for a bus-only lane; and the impacts of the Resolution on Capitol Corridor Service. Director Miller moved adoption of Resolution No. 20-7, In the Matter of Support of Bus-Only Lane on the Bay Bridge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study
    West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Document Version Control Revision Updated By Organization Description of Revision Date Incorporate feedback from BART 8/14/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Board Member City of Richmond staff requested that South Richmond Transportation 8/20/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Connectivity Plan be included. Tech memo updated to note that this plan is covered in Section 2.15 Incorporated edits to address SMG 8/27/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff and TAC feedback 9/16/15 Tam Tran Parsons Brinckerhoff Made minor edits related to tense Document Sign-off Name Date Signature Rebecca Kohlstrand 09/16/15 ii Draft Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 West Contra Costa County Transportation Setting ........................................... 1 1.2 Study Purpose .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Memorandum ........................................................... 3 2 Review OF Prior Studies .................................................................................... 4 2.1 BART West Contra Costa Extension Study, 1983 ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Update to the Safety Element of the General Plan
    CITY OF HERCULES SAFETY ELEMENT Administrative Draft November 2020 Draft 2020 | HERCULES SAFETY ELEMENT VI-1 VI-2 Table of Contents 1.INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 9 PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC OUTREACH .......................................................................................................... 9 COMMUNITY PROFILE ............................................................................................................................................11 SENATE BILL 535 – DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES .......................................................................................................... 12 SENATE BILL 1000 – ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE................................................................................................................... 12 GENERAL PLAN POLICIES ........................................................................................................................................15 RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN ..........................................................................................................................15 LAND USE ELEMENT (ADOPTED 1998) ................................................................................................................................ 15 OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION ELEMENT (ADOPTED 1998) ............................................................................................... 16 HOUSING ELEMENT (ADOPTED 2015) ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notice and Agenda
    ` El Cerrito MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA DATE & TIME: Friday, July 24, 2015, 8:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. Hercules LOCATION: City of El Cerrito, Council Chambers 10890 San Pablo Avenue (at Manila Ave) El Cerrito, California (Accessible by AC Transit #72, #72M and #72R) Pinole 1. Call to Order and Self-Introductions – Chair Sherry McCoy 2. Public Comment. The public is welcome to address the Board on any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please fill out a speaker card and hand it to staff. Richmond CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Minutes of June 26, 2015 Board Meeting. (Attachment; Recommended Action: APPROVE) San Pablo 4. Monthly Update on WCCTAC Activities. (Attachment; Recommended Action: RECEIVE) 5. Financial Reports. The reports show the Agency’s revenues and expenses for Contra Costa June 2015. (Attachment; Recommended Action: RECEIVE) County 6. Payment of Invoices over $10,000. None (Information Only) 7. Revised Budget Summary Sheet. The FY16 budget, approved by the WCCTAC Board in June, contained one error in the Summary Budget sheet on the “Ending AC Transit Fund Balance” line. The error has been corrected and the revised sheet is attached per the Board’s request. (Attachment; Information Only) 8. Office Space Lease. Staff is proposing a one-year lease for 600 sq. ft. of adjacent office space. An explanatory staff report is attached. (Attachment; Recommended BART Action: APPROVE) 9. Measure J BART Funding for Hercules Transit Center improvements. With support from BART, the City of Hercules is proposing to make safety modifications and other improvements at the Hercules Transit Center, located at WestCAT the junction of I-80 and S.R.
    [Show full text]
  • CONOCOPHILLIPS RODEO REFINERY CLEAN FUELS EXPANSION PROJECT Environmental Impact Report SCH 2005092028 LP 052048
    CONOCOPHILLIPS RODEO REFINERY CLEAN FUELS EXPANSION PROJECT Environmental Impact Report SCH 2005092028 LP 052048 Contra Costa County November 2006 Community Development Department CONOCOPHILLIPS RODEO REFINERY CLEAN FUELS EXPANSION PROJECT Environmental Impact Report SCH 2005092028 LP 052048 Contra Costa County November 2006 Community Development Department 651 Pine Street 4th Floor - North Wing Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 335-1210 www.co.contra-costa.ca.us TABLE OF CONTENTS ConocoPhillips Rodeo Refinery Clean Fuels Expansion Project DEIR Page 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of This Document ................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Overview................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Key Areas of Environmental Concern................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Organization of the Document ............................................................................ 1-2 1.5 Use of this Document by Agencies ..................................................................... 1-3 1.6 Permits and Approvals........................................................................................ 1-3 2. Summary of Environmental Impacts........................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Summary of Impacts of the Proposed Project....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MTC, Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area
    Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Table of Contents Chapter Page Table Page 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 3.1 Average Bay Area weekday bicycle trips .................................... 14 2. Goals and Policies ................................................................................ 5 3.2 Average Bay Area weekend bicycle trips ..................................... 15 3. Background ......................................................................................... 11 3.3 Average Bay Area total bicycle trips ............................................ 16 • Physical setting ............................................................................... 11 3.4 Bay Area daily journey‐to‐work commuters ............................... 17 • Trip‐making trends ........................................................................ 12 3.5 Bay
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project RV and Tent Camping and a Redeveloped Golf Course Facility
    Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project RV and Tent Camping and a Redeveloped Golf Course Facility 3100 Franklin Canyon Road City of Hercules March 2021 Prepared by MIG, Inc. Berkeley, CA Table of Contents 1. Project Information ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Project Title ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Lead Agency Name and Address .......................................................................................... 5 1.3 Contact Person and Phone Number ...................................................................................... 5 1.4 Project Sponsors Names and Addresses ................................................................................ 5 1.5 General Plan Designation ..................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Zoning ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.7 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.8 Project Location and Context ............................................................................................... 5 1.9 Project Description ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Fire Service Delivery Study
    Pinole Fire Department Pinole, California REGIONAL FIRE SERVICE DELIVERY STUDY October 2019 Regional Fire Service Delivery Study City of Pinole Fire Department TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... iv SECTION I: EVALUATION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS .................................................................... 1 Current Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 2 Organizational Overview ............................................................................................................................ 2 Service Area & Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................... 5 Staffing Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Emergency Management ........................................................................................................................... 7 Fire Prevention ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Training ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA March 28, 2014 – 10:00 AM Madera County Board of Supervisors, Board Room 200 West Fourth Street Madera, CA
    Supervisor John Pedrozo, Chair, Merced County Councilmember Steve Cohn, Vice Chair, City of Sacramento c/o San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Supervisor Henry Perea, Vice Chair, Fresno County 949 East Channel Street Supervisor Vito Chiesa, Stanislaus County Stockton, CA 95202 Supervisor Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Supervisor Allen Ishida, Tulare County Councilmember Bob Johnson, City of Lodi (209) 944-6220 or (800) 411-RAIL Councilmember Don Tatzin, City of Lafayette Supervisor Doug Verboon, Kings County Email: [email protected] Supervisor Tom Wheeler, Madera County AGENDA March 28, 2014 – 10:00 AM Madera County Board of Supervisors, Board Room 200 West Fourth Street Madera, CA This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff, at 209-944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Authority are conducted in English. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the offices of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission located at 949 E. Channel Street, Stockton, California, 95202 during normal business hours or by calling (209) 944-6220. The Agenda and meeting materials are also available on the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Website: http://www.acerail.com/Home/AboutUs/SJJPA.aspx, 1 Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Roll Call Chair Pedrozo 2 Public Comments Persons wishing to address the Authority on any item of interest to the public regarding SJJPA and the San Joaquin Rail Service shall state their names and addresses and make their presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • A MID-LIFE CRISIS for REGIONAL RAIL Fifty Years After BART: What’S Next for Regional Rail?
    A MID-LIFE CRISIS FOR REGIONAL RAIL Fifty Years After BART: What’s Next for Regional Rail? SPUR REPORT Adopted by the SPUR Board of Directors October 17, 2008 Released November 1, 2008 The primary author of this report was Jake Cummings, SPUR intern with assistance from Jeff Tumlin, Chi-Hsin Shao, Anne Halsted, Peter Mezey, Gillian Gillett, Hans Korve, Stuart Cohen, Brian Stokle, Val Menotti, Brian Stokle, Dave Snyder, Gabriel Metcalf, and Egon Terplan San Francisco Planning + Urban Research Association 654 Mission St., San Francisco, California 94105 www.spur.org SPUR | October 17, 2008 INDEX Index _____________________________________________________________________________ 2 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________ 3 Planning for the Next 50 Years 5 SPUR Recommendations ____________________________________________________________ 8 Recommendation #1: Increase Capacity in the Urban Core _______________________________ 10 BART Early Action Items 10 Muni Early Action Items 13 Mid-Term Actions (After 2030) 17 Recommendation #2: Provide Fast and Frequent Service for Regional Trips, Especially for Commuters _______________________________________________________________________ 20 Peninsula Early Action Items 20 East Bay Early Action Items 21 North Bay Early Action Items 23 Mid-Term Action Items (By 2030) 23 Recommendation #3: Improve Intercity Train Travel _____________________________________ 24 Capitol Corridor Early Action Items (by 2020) 24 Altamont Corridor Early Action Items (by 2020) 24
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER P
    Canada Report Winter 2018 NEWSLETTER p. 5 Summer 2018 Vol. 15, Issue 3 It’s Time to Register Individual For the Rail Summit! Highlights By Richard Rudolph, Ph.D. also examine plans for more rail Transportation Planner, Chair, Rail Users’ Network service between the Twin Cities- Ramsey County Regional Rail, Chicago, Duluth, Eau Claire, Des David Christianson, Exec. Dir. Join us to learn about what’s Moines and Kansas City, as well as -Organizing Council-W. Central A Survey of Train happening with passenger rail plans for more commuter and light Wisconsin Rail Coalition; and Service in the West, and rail transit in the Twin rail service around the Twin Cities Brian Lamb, General Manager, Cities and Upper Midwest. metro area. The focus will be on Metro Transit. Part 2 p. 2 The MOVING FORWARD projects which are moving forward, BY RAIL SUMMIT is taking and those which are standing still During lunch, participants will RPA Council Meets place Friday, June 1, 2018 at the and need support. have an opportunity to share in DC p. 3 Minneapolis Central Library, information and experiences 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis. Morning speakers include Alice regarding their efforts and NJ Transit Riders Wait Hausman, the DFL’s State those of their organizations to Sponsored by the Rail Users’ Representative; Alene Tchorumoff, promote passenger rail and rail for Improvement p. 4 Network and All Aboard Chair, Metropolitan Council; transit in their local areas. Minnesota, the conference will focus Kevin Brubaker, Deputy Director, Canada Report on how passenger rail and rail transit Environmental law & Policy The afternoon session will be Spring 2018 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Prologis Hercules Pipeline Removal Project (Project)
    MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HERCULES LLC/PROLOGIS PIPELINE REMOVAL PROJECT March 2014 Lead Agency: California State Lands Commission 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100 South Sacramento, California 95825 Applicant: Hercules LLC/Prologis Pier 1, Bay 1 San Francisco, California 94111 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES......................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 PROJECT AND AGENCY INFORMATION ........................................................... 1-1 1.1 PROJECT TITLE ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 LEAD AGENCY AND PROJECT APPLICANT .............................................. 1-1 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................. 1-1 1.4 ORGANIZATION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ................... 1-3 1.5 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ........................................... 1-3 1.6 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT .............................................................. 1-7 1.7 APPROVALS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS................................. 1-7 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Application for TIGER II Discretionary Grants Program City of Hercules
    Application for TIGER II Discretionary Grants Program City of Hercules, California Hercules Intermodal Transit Center (Hercules ITC) Contact: Lisa Hammon, Assistant City Manager City of Hercules 111 Civic Drive Hercules, CA 94547 510.799.8251 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Hercules ITC TIGER II Application Overview ......................................................3 I. Project Description ........................................................................................4 II. Project Parties...................................................................................................12 III. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of Project Funds .......................................14 IV. Selection Criteria ........................................................................................16 a. Long-Term Outcomes ........................................................................16 i. State of Good Repair ..........................................................................16 ii. Economic Competitiveness................................................................16 iii. Livability.................................................................................17 iv. Sustainability..............................................................................18 v. Safety.................................................................................................. 19 b. Job Creation and Economic Stimulus................................................... 19 c. Innovation ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]