DOCSLIB.ORG

The Orkney Islands in the Viking Age Moira Speirs MS Oglethorpe University, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Orkney Islands in the Viking Age Moira Speirs MS Oglethorpe University, Mspeirs@Oglethorpe.Edu Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 4 Issue 1 Oxford University Tutorial Papers by Article 2 Oglethorpe Univeristy Students July 2014 The Orkney Islands in the Viking Age Moira Speirs MS Oglethorpe University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur Part of the Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, Medieval History Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Speirs, Moira MS (2014) "The Orkney slI ands in the Viking Age," Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Speirs: Orkney Island in the Viking Age 1 At the height of the Viking Age the seas around northern Europe were a pas- sage for war and trade. Viking longships ruled the seas and today the tales of the power, might and influence of these Norsemen still fascinate us. A small group of islands to the north east of Scotland, the Orkney Islands, played a crucial role in supporting the Viking network in the tenth to thirteenth century. The history of the islands and their relationship with both Scotland and Nor- way illuminate the discussion of the Scandinavian influence in the North Sea region. The Orkneys are now part of Scotland but the history of the islands show that they were part of the Norwegian Scatterlands in The Viking Age1. Norway was certainly the most powerful of the three and although Scotland was al- ways independent the links between the two countries were strong. Orkney as an outpost of Norway was a focal point which played a large part in shaping their shared history. An accurate description of the situation would be that Norway, its province, Orkney, and its close neighbor, the land of the Scots, shared affiliations, treaties and trade agreements which were influenced by the circumstances in all three regions. Orkney’s importance grew beginning from being a Scandinavian outpost used for winter quarters through a thriving set- tlement, a source of supplies and manpower for Norway and at its height to a semi independent earldom capable of hosting diplomatic meetings between 1 I.P. Grohse, “From Asset in War to Asset in Diplomacy: Orkney in the Medieval Realm of Norway”, Island Studies Journal, 8, no.2 (2013) : 255 Published by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University, 2014 1 Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research, Vol. 4 [2014], Iss. 1, Art. 2 2 heads of state or their representatives. It is clear that Norway, Orkney, and Scotland shared a relationship that was not entirely that of conquerors and conquered. How and when did Orkney become such a key player in the rela- tions between Norway and Scotland? Were the Earls of Orkney a barrier to war between the nations? The answers to these questions will show that Ork- ney was a hub of commerce and diplomacy in The Late Middle Ages. Orkney’s geographical position is perhaps the first point which should be ex- plored. It is difficult to pinpoint exactly when Orkney became a Scandinavian province. We have evidence that the islands were known to be inhabited be- fore the Viking Age. In Roman times the name Orc or Cape Orkas was rec- orded on maps of the British Isles2. There are a few very early mentions of the people who inhabited these northernmost islands. Two distinct early tribal peoples for which we have evidence are the Picts and the Papar. One early source states that “these islands were inhabited by the Picts, who were only a little bigger than pigmies, worked great marvels in city building each evening and morning, but at noontide they were utterly bereft of their strength and hid 3 for fear in little subterranean dwellings” 2, W.P.L. Thomson, The New History of Orkney. (Edinburgh: Birlinn,2 008) 4. 3 C. Phelpstead and D.I. Kunin, A History of Norway and the Passion and Miracles of Blessed Óláfr ( London: Viking Society for Northern Research Text, 2001) 8. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur/vol4/iss1/2 2 Speirs: Orkney Island in the Viking Age 3 The same source describes the Papar as “Africans who practiced Judaism” which seem to our modern senses entirely unbelievable, it may be that some- thing of the essence of that bold statement is lost in translation 4. The earliest note regarding attacks in the area is from Dicuil around 825 C.E. He mentions islands about two days sail away from Norway which were inhabited by Irish hermits but then abandoned because of Norse raiders5. It is not specifically noted which islands but it is probably the Faros or the Western Isles. Orkney is a little further off, however it is very unlikely that those Norse raiders who had found the northernmost islands had not discovered Orkney and Shetland as well; two days sailing is inconsequential for a Viking ship. Sagas and myths can give clues to what was happening in the world when they were written, or sung, but, there is more than likely a great deal of poetic li- cense contained in the fabulous stories. The truth probably lies between the lines and they can be most useful for details of everyday life which would be unnecessary to embellish. A perfect example is Einar, regarded as the first in a line of successful Earls of Orkney6. In Harold Fairhair’s saga we hear of King Harold Fairhair (of Norway) giving the title of Earl (of Orkney) to Rongvald of Mœr. The fact that the Norwegian King granted the earldom is strong evidence that Orkney was regarded as an integral part of Norwegian 4 ibid 5 Ducil , The Northern Isles, ed. F.T. Wainwright, (New York: Thomas Nelson, 1962), 131 6 Heimkringla C890, in Anderson, Alan Orr (ed. and trans.), Early Sources of Scottish Histo- ry: AD 500–1286, vol. i (Edinburgh, 1923) p.373 Published by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University, 2014 3 Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research, Vol. 4 [2014], Iss. 1, Art. 2 4 territories. A small number of winter shelters seem hardly likely to need an Earl to oversee them. It is more likely that Norway had so large a number of citizens on the Islands that the King needed his representative in place to en- sure Norwegian law and his rule was being upheld. A snippet in the Orkneyinga saga, tells the tale of Rongvald's son Einar. He is sent off by his father to rid Orkney of Vikings who had taken over some settlements there. The Orkneyinga states ‘Einar sailed west to Shetland to gather forces7’. If Einar was sure he would find manpower on the Shetland Isles it is safe to as- sume that there were already some Norwegian settlements on those islands. He must also have been sure that they would be ready to fight with him for Orkney. This suggests that both Shetland and Orkney were well established as territories of Norway. A few years later the Orkneyinga also mentions a quar- rel resulting in Einar fleeing to Caithness, evidencing a Norwegian settlement there8. The saga finishes his tale by telling that he was a good ruler for many years and died in his bed. This is such an unusual end for a Norse hero that historians may be justified in believing it to be based in fact9. In the absence of written records and reliable sources it is understandable that historians interpret what sparse evidence is available. One of theses sources of evidence is the examination of the linguistic roots of place names. The prem- 7. Edwards & and Pálsson H. (Ed) Orkneyinga Saga:The History of the Earls of Orkney, Harmondsworth, (1981) p.29 8 Edwards and Pálsson, Orkneyinga p.32 9 ibid https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur/vol4/iss1/2 4 Speirs: Orkney Island in the Viking Age 5 ise is that tracing the Norse language in place names and dating when each name was used will map the course of Viking settlement10. It can not be con- sidered a precise way of making a timeline for the History of the rise of the Vikings. Until the late 800’s C.E. several different peoples each with a differ- ent language existed in the northern hemisphere. An early note attached to the Ravenna Cosmography written in the eight century refers to the confusion of place names which already existed in the islands: ‘Also in the same ocean are thirty-three islands called the Orchades not all of which are inhabited. Nevertheless we would wish, Christ willing, to name them, but because of the confusion resulting from this land be- ing controlled by different peoples who, according to the barbarian fashion, call the same islands by different names, we leave their names unlisted11’. A collection of three letters at the beginning or end of a name which may have been used on some maps and not on others can only be regarded as cir- cumstantial evidence. Place names are useful in defining the geographical po- sition of settlements which bear out comments in the sagas, e.g. the 10 W.F.H. NIcholaisen. ‘The Viking Settlement of Scotland: The evidence of Place Names’. in Farrell, R.T. The Vikings London (1982), Crawford B (ed) Scandanavian settlement in Northern Britain: Thirteen Studies of Place -Names in their Historical Context. London (1995) 11 Ravenna Cosmography in Thomson (2008) p.42 Published by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University, 2014 5 Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research, Vol.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anne R Johnston Phd Thesis
    ;<>?3 ?3@@8393;@ 6; @53 6;;3> 530>623? 1/# *%%"&(%%- B6@5 ?=316/8 >343>3;13 @< @53 6?8/;2? <4 9A88! 1<88 /;2 @6>33 /OOG ># 7PJOSTPO / @JGSKS ?UDNKTTGF HPR TJG 2GIRGG PH =J2 CT TJG AOKVGRSKTY PH ?T# /OFRGWS &++& 4UMM NGTCFCTC HPR TJKS KTGN KS CVCKMCDMG KO >GSGCREJ.?T/OFRGWS,4UMM@GXT CT, JTTQ,$$RGSGCREJ"RGQPSKTPRY#ST"COFRGWS#CE#UL$ =MGCSG USG TJKS KFGOTKHKGR TP EKTG PR MKOL TP TJKS KTGN, JTTQ,$$JFM#JCOFMG#OGT$&%%'($'+)% @JKS KTGN KS QRPTGETGF DY PRKIKOCM EPQYRKIJT Norse settlement in the Inner Hebrides ca 800-1300 with special reference to the islands of Mull, Coll and Tiree A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anne R Johnston Department of Mediaeval History University of St Andrews November 1990 IVDR E A" ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS None of this work would have been possible without the award of a studentship from the University of &Andrews. I am also grateful to the British Council for granting me a scholarship which enabled me to study at the Institute of History, University of Oslo and to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs for financing an additional 3 months fieldwork in the Sunnmore Islands. My sincere thanks also go to Prof Ragni Piene who employed me on a part time basis thereby allowing me to spend an additional year in Oslo when I was without funding. In Norway I would like to thank Dr P S Anderson who acted as my supervisor. Thanks are likewise due to Dr H Kongsrud of the Norwegian State Archives and to Dr T Scmidt of the Place Name Institute, both of whom were generous with their time.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on the EAELDOM of CAITHNESS. by W. F. SKENE, LL.D., F.S.A
    NOTES ON THE EAELDOM OF CAITHNESS. By W. F. SKENE, LL.D., F.S.A. SOOT. The earldom of Caithness was possessed for many generations by the Norwegian Earls of Orkney. They held the Islands of Orkney undur e Kinth f Norwago y accordin o Norwegiagt n custom whicy b , e titlhth e of Jarl or Earl was a personal title. They held the earldom of Caith- ness unde Kine f th rScotland o g s tenuraccordancn it i s d ewa an , e with lawe th Scotlandf o s . fine W d fro Orkneyinge mth a Saga that during this perio Orknee dth y islands were frequently divided into two portions, and each half held by different members of the Norwegian family, each bearing the title of earl. We likewise find that the earldom of Caithness was at such times also frequently divided, and each half held by different Earls of Orkney, though whether both bore the title of Earl of Caithness does not appear. It is unnecessary for our purpose to go further back than the rale of Thorfinn, Ear f Orkneyo l dieo dwh , about A.U. 1056 undoubtedld an , y held the whole of the Orkneys and the entire earldom of Caithness for lona g period. He had two sons, Paul and Erlend, who after his death ruled jointly without dividing the earldoms theid an , r descendant termee b y e dth sma line of Paul and the line of Erlend. 572 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, MARCH 11, 1878. After their deat e islandth h s were divided between f Hakono n so , Paul, and Magnus, son of Erlend, each bearing the title of earl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norse Influence on Celtic Scotland Published by James Maclehose and Sons, Glasgow
    i^ttiin •••7 * tuwn 1 1 ,1 vir tiiTiv^Vv5*^M òlo^l^!^^ '^- - /f^K$ , yt A"-^^^^- /^AO. "-'no.-' iiuUcotettt>tnc -DOcholiiunc THE NORSE INFLUENCE ON CELTIC SCOTLAND PUBLISHED BY JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS, GLASGOW, inblishcre to the anibersitg. MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON. New York, • • The Macmillan Co. Toronto, • - • The Mactnillan Co. of Canada. London, • . - Simpkin, Hamilton and Co. Cambridse, • Bowes and Bowes. Edinburgh, • • Douglas and Foults. Sydney, • • Angus and Robertson. THE NORSE INFLUENCE ON CELTIC SCOTLAND BY GEORGE HENDERSON M.A. (Edin.), B.Litt. (Jesus Coll., Oxon.), Ph.D. (Vienna) KELLY-MACCALLUM LECTURER IN CELTIC, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW EXAMINER IN SCOTTISH GADHELIC, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON GLASGOW JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS PUBLISHERS TO THE UNIVERSITY I9IO Is buaine focal no toic an t-saoghail. A word is 7nore lasting than the world's wealth. ' ' Gadhelic Proverb. Lochlannaich is ànnuinn iad. Norsemen and heroes they. ' Book of the Dean of Lismore. Lochlannaich thi'eun Toiseach bhiir sgéil Sliochd solta ofrettmh Mhamiis. Of Norsemen bold Of doughty mould Your line of oldfrom Magnus. '' AIairi inghean Alasdair Ruaidh. PREFACE Since ever dwellers on the Continent were first able to navigate the ocean, the isles of Great Britain and Ireland must have been objects which excited their supreme interest. To this we owe in part the com- ing of our own early ancestors to these isles. But while we have histories which inform us of the several historic invasions, they all seem to me to belittle far too much the influence of the Norse Invasions in particular. This error I would fain correct, so far as regards Celtic Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Orcadians (And Some Shetlanders) Who Worked West of the Rockies in the Fur Trade up to 1858 (Unedited Biographies in Progress)
    Orcadians (and some Shetlanders) who worked west of the Rockies in the fur trade up to 1858 (unedited biographies in progress) As compiled by: Bruce M. Watson 208-1948 Beach Avenue Vancouver, B. C. Canada, V6G 1Z2 As of: March, 1998 Information to be shared with Family History Society of Orkney. Corrections, additions, etc., to be returned to Bruce M. Watson. A complete set of biographies to remain in Orkney with Society. George Aitken [variation: Aiken ] (c.1815-?) [sett-Willamette] HBC employee, British: Orcadian Scot, b. c. August 20, 1815 in "Greenay", Birsay, Orkney, North Britain [U.K.] to Alexander (?-?) and Margaret [Johnston] Aiken (?-?), d. (date and place not traced), associated with: Fort Vancouver general charges (l84l-42) blacksmith Fort Stikine (l842-43) blacksmith steamer Beaver (l843-44) blacksmith Fort Vancouver (l844-45) blacksmith Fort Vancouver Depot (l845-49) blacksmith Columbia (l849-50) Columbia (l850-52) freeman Twenty one year old Orcadian blacksmith, George Aiken, signed on with the Hudson's Bay Company February 27, l836 and sailed to York Factory where he spent outfits 1837-40; he then moved to and worked at Norway House in 1840-41 before being assigned to the Columbia District in 1841. Aiken worked quietly and competently in the Columbia district mainly at coastal forts and on the steamer Beaver as a blacksmith until March 1, 1849 at which point he went to California, most certainly to participate in the Gold Rush. He appears to have returned to settle in the Willamette Valley and had an association with the HBC until 1852. Aiken's family life or subsequent activities have not been traced.
    [Show full text]
  • Suibne Mac Cináeda from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    11/4/2015 4:33 PM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suibne_mac_Cináeda Suibne mac Cináeda From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Suibne mac Cináeda (died 1034),[2] also known as Suibne mac Cinaeda,[3] Suibne mac Cinaedh,[4] and Suibhne mac Cináeda,[5][note 1] was an Suibne mac Cináeda eleventh-century ruler of the Gall Gaidheil, a population of mixed King of the Gall Gaidheil Scandinavian and Gaelic ethnicity. There is little known of Suibne, as he is only attested in three sources that record the year of his death. He seems to have ruled in a region where Gall Gaidheil are known to have dwelt: either the Hebrides, the Firth of Clyde region, or somewhere along the south- Suibne's name as it appears on folio 16v of Oxford western coast of Scotland from the firth southwards into Galloway. Bodleian Library MS Rawlinson B 488 (the Annals of Tigernach).[1] Suibne's patronym, meaning "son of Cináed", could be evidence that he was a Died 1034 brother of the reigning Máel Coluim mac Cináeda, King of Scotland, and thus a member of the royal Alpínid dynasty. Suibne's career appears to have Dynasty possibly Alpínid dynasty coincided with an expansion of the Gall Gaidheil along the south-west coast Father possibly Cináed mac Maíl Choluim of what is today Scotland. This extension of power may have partially contributed to the destruction of the Kingdom of Strathclyde, an embattled realm which then faced aggressions from Dublin Vikings, Northumbrians, and Scots as well. The circumstances of Suibne's death are unknown, although one possibility could be that he was caught up in the vicious dynastic-strife endured by the Alpínids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diocese of Sodor Between N I Ð Aróss and Avignon – Rome, 1266
    Theð diocese of Sodor between Ni aróss and Avignon – Rome, 1266-1472 Sarah E. Thomas THE organisation and administration of the diocese of Sodor has been discussed by a number of scholars, either jointly with Argyll or in relation to 1 ð Norway. In 1266 the diocese of Sodor or Su reyjar encompassed the Hebrides and the Isle of Man, but by the end of the fourteenth century, it was divided between the Scottish Hebrides and English Man. The diocese’s origins lay in the Norseð kingdom of the Isles and Man and its inclusion in the province of Ni aróss can be traced back to the actions of Olaf 2 Godredsson in the 1150s.ð After the Treaty of Perth of 2 July 1266, Sodor remained within the Ni aróss church province whilst secular sovereignty 3 and patronage of the see had been transferred to the King of Scots. However, wider developments in the Christian world and the transfer of allegiance of Hebridean secular ðrulers from Norway to Scotland after 1266 would loosen Sodor’s ties to Ni aróss. This article examines the diocese of Sodor’s relationship with its metropolitan and the rather neglected area of its developing links with the papacy. It argues that the growing 1 A.I. Dunlop, ‘Notes on the Church in the Dioceses of Sodor and Argyll’, Records of the Scottish Church History Society 16 (1968) [henceforth RSCHS]; I.B. Cowan, ‘The Medieval Church in Argyll and the Isles’, RSCHS 20 (1978-80); A.D.M. Barrell, ‘The church in the West Highlands in the late middle ages’, Innes Review 54 (2003); A.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland: Bruce 286
    Scotland: Bruce 286 Scotland: Bruce Robert the Bruce “Robert I (1274 – 1329) the Bruce holds an honored place in Scottish history as the king (1306 – 1329) who resisted the English and freed Scotland from their rule. He hailed from the Bruce family, one of several who vied for the Scottish throne in the 1200s. His grandfather, also named Robert the Bruce, had been an unsuccessful claimant to the Scottish throne in 1290. Robert I Bruce became earl of Carrick in 1292 at the age of 18, later becoming lord of Annandale and of the Bruce territories in England when his father died in 1304. “In 1296, Robert pledged his loyalty to King Edward I of England, but the following year he joined the struggle for national independence. He fought at his father’s side when the latter tried to depose the Scottish king, John Baliol. Baliol’s fall opened the way for fierce political infighting. In 1306, Robert quarreled with and eventually murdered the Scottish patriot John Comyn, Lord of Badenoch, in their struggle for leadership. Robert claimed the throne and traveled to Scone where he was crowned king on March 27, 1306, in open defiance of King Edward. “A few months later the English defeated Robert’s forces at Methven. Robert fled to the west, taking refuge on the island of Rathlin off the coast of Ireland. Edward then confiscated Bruce property, punished Robert’s followers, and executed his three brothers. A legend has Robert learning courage and perseverance from a determined spider he watched during his exile. “Robert returned to Scotland in 1307 and won a victory at Loudon Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • ST MAGNUS: an EXPLORATION of HIS SAINTHOOD William P
    ST MAGNUS: AN EXPLORATION OF HIS SAINTHOOD William P. L. Thomson When the editors of New Dictionary of National Biography were recently discussing ways in which the new edition is different from the old, they re­ marked that one of the changes is in the treatment of saints: The lives [of saints] are no longer viewed as straightforward stories with an unfor­ tunate, but easily discounted, tendency to exaggeration, but may now be valued more for what they reveal about their authors, or about the milieu in which they were written, than for any information they contain about their ostensible subjects (DNB 1998). This is a good note on which to begin the exploration of Magnus's saint­ hood. We need to concern ourselves with the historical Magnus - and Magnus has a better historical basis than many saints - but equally we need to explore the ways people have perceived his sainthood and often manipulated it for their own purposes. The Divided Earldom The great Earl Thorfinn was dead by I 066 and his earldom was shared by his two sons (fig. I). It was a weakness of the earldom that it was divisible among heirs, and the joint rule of Paul and Erlend gave rise to a split which resulted not just in THOR FINN PAUL I ERLEND Kali I I HAKON MAGNUS Gunnhild m Kol I ,- I Maddad m Margaret HARALD PAUL II ROGNVALD E. of Atholl I HARALD MADDADSSON Ingirid I Harald the Younger Fig. 1. The Earls of Orkney. 46 the martyrdom of Magnus, but in feuds which still continued three and four generations later when Orkneyinga Saga was written (c.1200).
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Homozygosity, inbreeding and health in European populations Ruth McQuillan PhD Thesis The University of Edinburgh 2009 Table of Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vii Declaration xi Notes xii Abbreviations xiii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Key concepts 1 1.2 Measuring inbreeding, autozygosity and homozygosity 5 1.3 Inbreeding and health in human populations 11 1.4 The genetic architecture of common complex disease 14 1.5 Thesis Aims and Objectives 17 Chapter 2: Historical and genealogical description of the population of the North Isles of Orkney 24 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 ORCADES Pedigree Analysis: Methods 28 2.3 Results 29 2.4 Discussion 40 2.4.1 The population history of Orkney
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA HISTORICAL JOURNAL Vol
    136 UCLA HISTORICAL JOURNAL Vol. 4 remain more or less anonymous. Although Carsten is writing in English, his roots in a German conception of history are undeniable. He is evidently trying to show wie es eigentlich gewesen, letting the documents speak for themselves, a tact which can be a shortcoming for some, a strength for others. Although this work is flawed because of an obsession for particulars, Carsten nonetheless does remain impartial throughout. He does not betray any sympathies or antipathies to any of the parties involved and thus cannot be accused of political bias. Carsten 's painstakingly detailed study will therefore prove to be a source of valuable information for the specialist, breaking new ground in its field, but of little appeal to the general reader. Hermann Beck University of Freiburg Robert Stewart Earl of Orkney, Lord of Shetland, 1533-1593. By PETER D. ANDERSON. Atlantic Highlands, N. J.: Humanities Press, 1982. Pp. 245. Maps, appendices, glossary, abbreviations, notes, bibliography, index. $31.50. This well-written and erudite book is a fine example of the biographer's art well practiced and is destined to become a classic for scholars and dilettantes alike. It is at once a very good biographical study of the first Stewart earl of Orkney and an excellent constitutional history of the islanders over whom he reigned. Anderson's principal concern throughout the book is to place the career of Robert Stewart into the context of the factions, families, and feuds that shaped the history of sixteenth-century Scotland and her northern islands. To that end, Anderson, after briefly recapitu- lating the tumultuous history of the Orkney Islands as a Scottish dependency, presents the career of Robert Stewart as one of continuous interaction between Stewart and his family, his factions, the royal governments, and his Orcadian and Shetlander subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Pack Introduction
    The Diocese of Sodor and Man Together making Christ visible The Archdeacon of Man and Vicar of St George & All Saints, Douglas Job information pack Introduction We are seeking to appoint an Archdeacon of Man and Vicar of the Parish of St George & All Saints, Douglas, with effect from December 2021. The Crown has the right of appointment to the Archdeaconry and the Bishop the right of patronage to the Parish. It is, therefore, intended that the Crown and Bishop will make a joint appointment. We are looking for a priest, probably with fifteen years of parochial experience, who can imagine and enable God's mission, with energy and a desire to serve God and people, and who is called to use administrative and pastoral gifts in the care and support of our clergy and parishes. The Archdeacon has responsibilities across the whole of the island-diocese, working with colleagues in diocesan roles, with those involved in public ministry, with parishes, with our ecumenical partners and with many non-church agencies in helping to create conditions for mission and growth. The ministry of the Archdeacon is to assist in the efficient and pastorally-sensitive running of the Diocese. The Archdeacon is to encourage the pursuit of excellence to create the best conditions for growth in every dimension of the Christian life and of the mission Christ has committed to His Church. St. George's Church is the civic church of Douglas, effectively only second in significance to the Cathedral, and exercises an important ministry in the wider life of the capital city of the Isle of Man.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction On 2 July, 1266, diplomatic representatives of King Magnus vi of Norway and King Alexander iii of Scotland convened in Perth to sign a treaty aimed at bringing political order to the unstable Norse-Scottish frontier.1 Three years earlier, Alexander iii had sponsored an invasion of the Inner Hebrides, territo- ries which had long been claimed by the Norwegian crown, prompting Magnus vi’s predecessor, King Hákon iv, to launch a colossal fleet to fight back the Scottish invaders and reestablish Norway’s preeminence over the isles around the Irish Sea. Despite its ambitious scale, the Norwegian fleet was driven back, leaving those proud possessions of the Norwegian crown in the hands of a for- eign ruler.2 But it was not until 1266 that the Scottish king’s practical lordship over the Hebrides was formalized in a finalis concordia, known more commonly as the Treaty of Perth.3 In a seemingly ancillary clause, Magnus vi emphasizes his lordship over two other island provinces, Orkney and Shetland, explaining that he was to retain the lordships, homages, rents and services from them to his own ‘dominion’.4 With this simple interpolation, the Norwegian king estab- lished a political regime that would come to shape the Norse-Scottish frontier and dictate the relations between the Norwegian and Scottish crowns for an- other two centuries until, in 1468/69, those isles also fell into the hands of a Scottish king, James iii.5 During that time, Orkney and Shetland represented 1 Diplomatarium Norvegicum, 21 vols. [dn], eds. C.C.A. Lange et al., Christiania & Oslo 1849–1995, 8, no.
    [Show full text]