Shetlanders Speak – Orcadians Sing by Klaske Van Leyden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shetlanders Speak – Orcadians Sing by Klaske Van Leyden 4 Shetlanders speak – Orcadians sing by Klaske van Leyden finally abandoned in favour of Lowland Scots in the course of the 18th century. Even though Norn is now an extinct language, it still lives on in the many Norn words and idioms which are one of the most well- known features of the local dialects. Most islanders are conscious of these Norn remnants in dialect vocabulary, which have also been documented in the dictionaries of Jakob Jakobsen, Hugh Marwick and, more recently, John Graham. Orcadians and Shetlanders are also well aware of the pronunciation features which make these accents not only unique in the English speaking world, but also quite different from each other. Yet, up till now, there has been very meagre mention of the crucial dissimilarities between the two dialects in the scholarly literature. Over the past five years, I have been investigating the differences between Orkney and Shetland pronunciation, for my PhD thesis at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands. In this article, I shall discuss some of my most important findings so far. Vowel and consonant duration When the famous phonetician Professor J.C. Klaske van Leyden was born in Gouda in the Netherlands in Catford visited the Northern Isles, in the 1950s, in 1959, and now lives in Vlaardingen. She has studied at the order to collect speech material for the Linguistic universities of Leyden and Edinburgh and the Delft University Atlas of Scotland, he observed that Shetland dialect of Technology. Her PhD thesis, on ‘Prosodic characterisation has a so-called Scandinavian syllable structure. This of Orkney and Shetland dialects’, should be completed in May implies that words of one syllable ending in a 2004. Photograph: Brian Smith consonant generally contain either a short vowel followed by a long consonant, or a long vowel o the outside world, Orkney and Shetland dialects followed by a short consonant. Consequently, there is are generally regarded as one and the same. But T an inverse relationship between vowel and final they are in fact quite different, as all local people consonant duration. In Norwegian, for example, tak know. The standard book on the accents of English (roof, ceiling) is pronounced with a long vowel and a worldwide treats Shetland and Orkney as if they were relatively short final consonant, while takk (thanks) one unit. However, natives of these islands know that has a relatively short vowel and a long final there are striking differences between the two. consonant. Note that the consonant duration is Recent research (as described below) shows that the reflected in Norwegian spelling. natives know more than the experts – as is so often So, according to Catford, Shetlanders pronounce the case in matters linguistic. words like baet (beat) and pit (put) with a short vowel It will not come as news to the readers of this and a long final consonant, while bait and boat are magazine that the dialects now spoken in Orkney and said with a long vowel and a short final consonant. Shetland have evolved from a shared parent language He concluded that this feature of Shetland – Norn – which was introduced by Viking settlers in pronunciation was most likely the result of the the ninth century. This Scandinavian language influence of Norn. remained the chief medium of communication in the Unfortunately, Catford did not provide any Northern Isles for several centuries, until it was precise measurements to support his argument, nor 5 did we learn if the phenomenon also occurred in and Edinburgh speakers, certain dialect words were Orkney dialect. Furthermore, as his observations replaced by others. The Norwegians read similar were based on a survey of, for the most part, elderly words but, of course, in their own language. To speakers, about half a century ago, we were unable to ensure that all words were said at a uniform speed tell whether this particular remnant of Norn had they were included in the sentence I say … again. All survived up to the present day. The aim of my study the recorded material was then stored on computer was to establish whether in present-day Shetland disk. dialect there is indeed an inverse relationship Measurement of the vowel and consonant between vowel and final consonant duration, and if duration of the recorded words was done by an identical pattern is to be found in Orkney dialect. computer, using special speech analysis software. In addition, for comparison, I also examined vowel With the sound waveform of the recorded speech and consonant duration in Norwegian and Edinburgh displayed on screen, the boundaries between the speech. vowel and consonants of a particular word were A total of 36 volunteers were recorded for my marked, after which the duration in milliseconds (i.e. survey: ten Shetlanders, ten Orcadians, six 1/1000 of a second) was computed automatically. For Norwegians and ten people from Edinburgh. Each each of the 100 test words, the average vowel and speaker read a list of over 100 different single final consonant duration was calculated per speaker syllable words, such as beat, dim and beef. The list group. also included about twenty dialect items, for For Shetland speech, the results can be example, meid (landmark), bide (dwell) and böd summarised as follows. Across the 100 test words, (fisherman’s booth or hut); in the case of the Orkney we find that vowel duration is between about 80 and 6 250 milliseconds (ms), while final consonant every Shetlander is an expert in this field! – up to duration is between 65 and 165 ms. Yet, the now, little, if anything, of a scientific nature has been relationship between vowel and final consonant written about this matter. duration is not random: when the vowel duration is In my investigation I addressed two main about 100 ms, final consonant duration is 150ms, questions. Firstly, how well are native Orkney and whereas a relatively long vowel of 200 ms is Shetland speakers able to distinguish between the followed by a final consonant of 100 ms in duration. two dialects when asked to judge very short speech So one can say: ‘the longer the vowel, the shorter the fragments? And secondly, exactly what form do the final consonant’. To the non-specialist a decrease of Orkney and Shetland intonation patterns in fact take? 50 ms may seem insignificant, but 50 ms is in fact a considerable difference in speech research. To tackle the first question, I asked 20 In Orkney and Edinburgh speech, vowel duration Shetlanders and 20 Orcadians to listen carefully to is also between 80 and 250 ms, whereas final short fragments of speech pronounced by four male consonant duration is between about 50 and 125 ms. speakers from Orkney, four from Shetland and four Hence, the final consonants are generally shorter than from mainland Scotland. The listeners had to indicate in Shetland. It is true, then, that ‘Shetland speakers on a response sheet whether they thought a particular seem to hold their words longer’, as some of my speaker was from ‘Shetland’ (for Shetland listeners), Orkney participants remarked. The relationship from ‘Orkney’ (for Orcadians), or ‘from elsewhere’. between vowel and final consonant duration in both Since, apart from the dissimilarities in intonation, Orkney and Edinburgh speech seems less systematic. some Shetland vowels and consonants clearly differ Although long vowels are indeed generally followed from their Orkney counterparts, this would seem to by a short final consonant, short vowels can also be be an easy task. followed by a short final consonant. Therefore, to be able to find out to what degree For Norwegian speech, the inverse relationship intonation – rather than vowel sounds – helped the between vowel and final consonant duration is listeners to tell the dialects apart, the speech was similar to that found in Shetland. Yet, Norwegian altered, using a computer, to make it almost final consonants are generally considerably longer in impossible to distinguish the various vowels and duration than those of Shetland. The conclusion to be consonants. All that was left of the speech was the drawn, therefore, is that present-day Shetland dialect rhythm and the melody. It sounded much as if one appears to have preserved its typically Scandinavian were eavesdropping on a conversation in an adjacent (Norn) syllable structure with an inverse relationship room, and trying to make out what was being said. between vowel and consonant duration. What in After the participants had listened to the Shetland speech could be considered as a kind of unintelligible fragments, the same fragments were compensatory mechanism is even more striking in then repeated (in a different order) as normal, Norwegian. intelligible speech. In Orkney and Edinburgh speech, however, the Nobody reading this will find it at all surprising inverse relationship between vowel and final that it was an easy task to identify the Orkney consonant is insignificant. So it seems that with speakers. As it turns out, the results of the listening respect to this pronunciation feature, Shetland is test proved to be more complex and more interesting. linguistically still a little closer to Norway than to The Orkney listeners identified all speech fragments Scotland. In Orkney dialect, this particular remnant spoken by Orcadians, even in the unintelligible of Norn has apparently been lost, and this seems most version, as from Orkney and classified the Shetland likely to be because of the strong influence of and Edinburgh speakers as ‘from elsewhere’. mainland Scots dialects. However, although when listening to the unintelligible fragments the Shetland listeners had no Intonation problem in classifying the Orcadians as being ‘from The most striking difference between Orkney and elsewhere’, they were nevertheless unable to Shetland dialects is the dissimilarity in intonation distinguish between the Shetlanders and the speakers (speech melody).
Recommended publications
  • Orcadians (And Some Shetlanders) Who Worked West of the Rockies in the Fur Trade up to 1858 (Unedited Biographies in Progress)
    Orcadians (and some Shetlanders) who worked west of the Rockies in the fur trade up to 1858 (unedited biographies in progress) As compiled by: Bruce M. Watson 208-1948 Beach Avenue Vancouver, B. C. Canada, V6G 1Z2 As of: March, 1998 Information to be shared with Family History Society of Orkney. Corrections, additions, etc., to be returned to Bruce M. Watson. A complete set of biographies to remain in Orkney with Society. George Aitken [variation: Aiken ] (c.1815-?) [sett-Willamette] HBC employee, British: Orcadian Scot, b. c. August 20, 1815 in "Greenay", Birsay, Orkney, North Britain [U.K.] to Alexander (?-?) and Margaret [Johnston] Aiken (?-?), d. (date and place not traced), associated with: Fort Vancouver general charges (l84l-42) blacksmith Fort Stikine (l842-43) blacksmith steamer Beaver (l843-44) blacksmith Fort Vancouver (l844-45) blacksmith Fort Vancouver Depot (l845-49) blacksmith Columbia (l849-50) Columbia (l850-52) freeman Twenty one year old Orcadian blacksmith, George Aiken, signed on with the Hudson's Bay Company February 27, l836 and sailed to York Factory where he spent outfits 1837-40; he then moved to and worked at Norway House in 1840-41 before being assigned to the Columbia District in 1841. Aiken worked quietly and competently in the Columbia district mainly at coastal forts and on the steamer Beaver as a blacksmith until March 1, 1849 at which point he went to California, most certainly to participate in the Gold Rush. He appears to have returned to settle in the Willamette Valley and had an association with the HBC until 1852. Aiken's family life or subsequent activities have not been traced.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Homozygosity, inbreeding and health in European populations Ruth McQuillan PhD Thesis The University of Edinburgh 2009 Table of Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vii Declaration xi Notes xii Abbreviations xiii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Key concepts 1 1.2 Measuring inbreeding, autozygosity and homozygosity 5 1.3 Inbreeding and health in human populations 11 1.4 The genetic architecture of common complex disease 14 1.5 Thesis Aims and Objectives 17 Chapter 2: Historical and genealogical description of the population of the North Isles of Orkney 24 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 ORCADES Pedigree Analysis: Methods 28 2.3 Results 29 2.4 Discussion 40 2.4.1 The population history of Orkney
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Meaning: Lived Space and Early Neolithic of Orkney Introduction
    Fishing for Meaning: Lived Space and early Neolithic of Orkney Introduction “Being at the junction of the North Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean … the sea is a constant, unforgettable presence in the islands.” David Fraser (1983, 224) The ‘unforgettable presence’ of the sea is notable by its absence in many accounts of the Neolithic of coastal and island areas within the British Isles. The story as most frequently told is one of terrestrial action; of monumental construction, polished stone technology, pottery and domesticates. When the sea does emerge it is often of a homogenous nature, a resource to be exploited with little significance. This treatment is diametrically opposed to the time spent in deriving meaning from action within the terrestrial landscapes of the Neolithic, within which all manner of subtle nuances and potential references are considered. Yet to people living in coastal areas and small island groups, perceptions of the sea are often anything but homogenous. As such, a myriad of skills, relationships and experiences associated with maritime practice have been marginalised in our reconstructions. This poses a problem when we come to contextualise any action within the Neolithic, maritime or terrestrial, such as monument construction because we have little idea of how these different practices articulate. This paper considers how an integration of maritime and terrestrial data within a ‘lived-space’ perspective can change our understandings. An approach that challenges stereotypes and explores relationships through the temporal and spatial nature of action is advocated. Attention will first be given to identifying archaeological stereotypes, before outlining what a lived-space perspective entails, and following its application to early Neolithic material from the Knap of Howar on Papa Westray in Orkney.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER of the ORKNEY FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Issue No 57 March 2011
    NEWSLETTER OFSIB THE ORKNEY FAMILY FOLK HISTORY SOCIETY NEWSISSUE No 57 MARCH 2011 graphics John Sinclair 2 NEWSLETTER OF THE ORKNEY FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Issue No 57 March 2011 ORKNEY FAMILY HISTORY NEWSLETTER Issue No 57 March 2011 CONTENTS FRONT COVER Spring From has Sprung the chair PAGE 2 From the Chair As the economic recession starts to impact on people’s lives, PAGE 3 there are likely to be many changes over this next year. In Tumbledown Orkney, the Council has been consulting with the Orkney 'UPPERTOWN' community under the banner of “Tough Times – Tough Choices”. When researching one’s family history you do not PAGES 4,5 & 6 have to go back that many years when the same could have Capt. John Robert Arthurson equally described the lives of our forbearers. In reality their predicament was probably 20 times worse than what we have to face. Our committee is now back to full strength and we welcome Morag Sinclair on to our PAGE 7 Orkney Picnic. committee. Membership continues to grow with the Society now with over 2,500 members Tumbledown since its inception. Correction The 2011 programme began in February with a talk by David Eaton on “Momento Mori” – (How we commemorate the Dead). His slide show highlighted various styles of gravestones and tombs; their inscriptions, symbolism and other aspects of how past PAGE 8 The 1911 Census generations have commemorated their ancestor’s lives and deaths. Our March programme again explores the web with an emphasis of “Emigration Records” PAGE 9 and other new sites. There continues to be expansion in the range of Website resources 'Life un the targeted at the family history market.
    [Show full text]
  • Earldom and Kingdom: Orkney in the Realm of Norway 1195-13791
    EARLDOM AND KINGDOM: ORKNEY IN THE REALM OF NORWAY 1195-13791 Steinar Imsen The years 1195 and 1379 are regarded as milestones in the political history of Orkney. Historians seem to agree that Earl Harold Maddadson 's surrender to King Sverre in 1195 was the starting point for Orkney's incorporation into the Norwegian state. 2 The ambition of the earls of Orkney to build a Norse principal­ ity controlling Northern Scotland and parts of the Irish Sea was crushed by the end of the 12 111 century, when the old earldom was squeezed between the expand­ ing kingdoms of Scotland and Norway. Just as the year 1195 marks the subordination of the Northern Isles to the realm ofNorway, the installation of Henry Sinclair as earl of Orkney in 1379, at least in Norwegian historiography, signals the coming transition of Orkney from Norwegian to Scottish sovereignty in 1468. The Sinclair earls were the last Norwegian earls, though of Scottish descent, and they contributed heavily to turning Orkney away from Scandinavia and anchoring the islands in the politics of northern Scotland. Even before their time, however, segments of Orcadian society were being scotticised, especially the church and the local clergy. In 1369 relations between the Norwegian king and the bishop of Orkney reached a critical juncture. A settlement that year stated that the Norwegian king thereaf­ ter in all matters of importance to the Orcadians should act in accordance with 'counsel from the bishop and the richest men of Orkney and Shetland'. Thus relations between the Norwegian king and Orkney had developed a new dimen­ sion since 1195: the richest or best men of the country, which should be understood as representatives of the Orcadian community (in contemporary Latin 'communitas Orcadensis').
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart of Neolithic Orkney in Its Contemporary Contexts: Angela Mcclanahan
    The Heart of Neolithic Orkney in its Contemporary Contexts: A case study in heritage management and community values Angela McClanahan School of Art History and Archaeology The University of Manchester A project grant aided by: Historic Scotland The University of Manchester North American Foundation © Angela J. McClanahan 2004 Contents: List of Illustrations iii Abbreviations and Conventions v Acknowledgements vi 1.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………….. 1 Project Background…………………………………………. 1 Aims……………………………………………………………. 4 Objectives…………………………………………………..… 4 Report Structure…………………………………………….. 4 2.0 Project Approach: Theory and Method…………………………….. 6 Approaches to Heritage…………………………………… 9 Trends in visitor and community studies……………….. 9 Specific project description………………………………. 11 Summary……………………………………………………. 12 3.0 Orkney: a geographic, historical and social overview………… 14 The history of archaeological exploration and management in Orkney……………………………… 16 Orkney: perceptions and practices……………………… 17 Heritage, representation and the construction of Orkney………………………….. 20 Conclusions………………………………………………… 25 4.0 Heritage Management: mediating the past…………………….. 27 Conservation………………………………………………. 28 Presentation……………………………………………….. 29 Partnerships and stakeholders………………………….. 31 Conclusions……………………………………………….. 34 5.0 Experiencing the past……………………………………………. 36 The Ring of Brodgar………………………………………. 37 Access……………………………………………………….. 38 Presentation………………………………………………… 41 Place…………………………………………………………. 43 Practices…………………………………………………….. 44 Coach and
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney, Shetland and the Networks of the Northern Reformation*
    ORKNEY, SHETLAND AND THE NETWORKS OF THE NORTHERN REFORMATION* Charlotte Methuen (University of Glasgow) Abstract This article explores the possible implications of the relationship between Orkney and Shetland and Norway for understanding the spread of the Reformation, focusing on the period between the late 1520s, when Reforming ideas began to be preached in Bergen, and 1560, when the Reformation was introduced into Scotland, including Orkney and Shetland. Draws on a scholarship which has shown the importance for the Reformation of language, trade, migration and urban/rural distinctions it investigates tantalising hints of contact between Orkney and Shetland, Norway (particularly Bergen) and Germany in questions of religion. This article does not seek to revise current understandings of the relationships of Orkney and Shetland to Scotland but seeks to explore what insights into (proto-)Reformation processes in Orkney and Shetland when possible influences from debates the Norwegian context – specifically Bergen – are considered alongside the influence of Scottish debates about religion. It concludes that whilst there is some evidence of contacts between individuals and that these contacts must have had aspects which related to religious practice, both the rural nature of Orkney and Shetland communities, and their relative isolation, meant that Reformation ideas were slow to take hold. Keywords Orkney, Shetland, Bergen, Norway, Reformation Introduction In 1987 Gordon Donaldson, drawing on an article he had first published in 1959, commented
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney Library & Archive D1
    Orkney Library & Archive D1: MISCELLANEOUS SMALL GIFTS AND DEPOSITS D1/1 Kirkwall Gas Works and Stromness Gas Works Plans 1894-1969 Plans of lines of gas pipes, Kirkwall, 1910-1967; Kirkwall Gas Works, layout and miscellaneous plans, 1894-1969; Stromness Gas Works plans, 1950-1953. 1.08 Linear Metres Some allied material relating to gas undertakings is in National Archives of Scotland and plans and photographs in Royal Commission on Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland. D1/2 Charter by Robert, Earl of Orkney to Magnus Cursetter 1587 & 1913 Charter by Robert, Earl of Orkney to Magnus Cursetter of lands of Wasdale and others (parish of Firth), 1587; printed transcript of the charter, 1913. The transcription was made by the Reverend Henry Paton, M.A. 0.01 Linear Metres D1/3 Papers relating to rental of lands in island of Rousay 1742-1974 Rental of lands in island of Rousay, 1742; correspondence about place of manufacture of paper used in the rental, 1973-1974. 0.01 Linear Metres English D1/4 Eday Peat Company records 1926-1965 Financial records, 1931-1965; Workmen’s time books, 1930-1931, 1938-1942; Letter book, 1926-1928; Incoming correspondence, 1929-1945; Miscellaneous papers, 1926-1943, including trading accounts (1934-1943). 0.13 Linear Metres English D1/5 Craigie family, Harroldsgarth, Shapinsay, papers 1863-1944 Rent book, 1863-1928; Correspondence about purchase and sale of Harroldsgarth, 1928-1944; Miscellaneous papers, 20th cent, including Constitution and Rules of the Shapansey Medical Asssociation. 0.03 Linear Metres English D1/6 Business papers of George Coghill, merchant, Buckquoy 1871-1902 Business letters, vouchers and memoranda of George Coghill, 1874- 1902; Day/cash book, 1871.
    [Show full text]
  • Fierce, Barbarous, Unbiddable Perceptions of Norse-Gael Identity in Orkney-Caithness C.1000-1400
    Fierce, Barbarous, Unbiddable Perceptions of Norse-Gael Identity in Orkney-Caithness c.1000-1400 Dylan Pierre Colin Howarth Master’s Thesis in Nordic Viking and Medieval Culture Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Spring 2017 Fierce, Barbarous, Unbiddable Perceptions of Norse-Gael Identity in Orkney-Caithness c.1000-1400 Dylan Pierre Colin Howarth Master’s Thesis in Nordic Viking and Medieval Culture Supervisor: Professor Jan Erik Rekdal, Universitetet i Oslo Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Spring 2017 © Dylan Pierre Colin Howarth 2017 Fierce, Barbarous, Unbiddable: Perceptions of Norse-Gael Identity in Orkney-Caithness, c.1000-1400 Dylan Pierre Colin Howarth http://www.duo.uio.no/ Printer: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo 2 Table of Contents Summary………………………………………………………………………………………4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………5 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………6 Chapter I: Pirates, Criminals, and Rebels 1.1 – An Earldom Born of and Plagued by Piracy?.....................................................13 1.2 – Sveinn Ásleifarson: The Archetypal Orcadian Viking?.......................................19 1.3 – Rögnvaldr Kali Kolsson: Viking Warrior and High-Medieval Nobleman……..24 1.4 – A Haven for Thugs and Outlaws………………………………………………..29 1.5 – Insubordination and Rebellion…………………………………………………35 Chapter II: Heathens, Saints, and Sinners 2.1 – The Pagan Past…………………………………………………………………45 2.2 – Magnús Erlendsson and Hákon Pálsson……………………………………….53 2.3 –
    [Show full text]
  • Sib Folk News September 2000 Issue 15
    Sib Folk News September 2000 Issue 15 The Newsletter of the Orkney Family History Society An interior view of St Magnus Cathedral, Kirkwall from a sketch by the Editor k Chairman's Report Welcome to Sib Folk News No 15. We are always a lot of memories exchanged have several new members to welcome to which would make interesting reading. the society, especially our first from South There are over 400 of us now and I would Africa. She is Mrs. Middleton from Sandton like to plead with you to think about writing S. A., member no. 492. We may soon have a small article about yourself or your family, people from other countries interested as the or just write a letter for us all to enjoy. treasurer and others are making contact with people via email. At the moment we have The next series of meetings starts on 14th over 400 paid-up members. September when we meet in Evie for the first time. This will be in the recently We are still functioning in 8 Broad Street opened Woodwick Gallery when Orkney's with difficulty. The committee has viewed Heritage Officer will be our speaker. On premises nearby which are marginally better 12th October the meeting is in the Royal but the wheels of officialdom turn slowly. Hotel. Nancy Scott will speak about the However, the volunteers are undeterred and Westray Heritage Centre. There should be press on faithfully. George Gray, with help lots of Westray exiles at that meeting. We from Irene Miller, has completed the list of are also looking forward to the Annual records held in the office.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in the Scottish Population Isolate of Orkney
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. QUANTITATIVE TRAITS RELATED TO PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA IN THE SCOTTISH POPULATION ISOLATE OF ORKNEY -VIDARSHI KUMUDU KUMARI KARUNARATNE- -PHD- -THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH- -2011- DECLARATION I declare that I composed this thesis. It is my own work. Where others have played a role, their contributions have been acknowledged accordingly. This work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Vidarshi Karunaratne September 2010 ii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my husband, Denes, and my parents, Ammi and Appachchi iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix ABSTACT xi LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES xii ABBREVIATIONS xvi Chapter 1: PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA 1 1.1 AN INTRODUCTION TO PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA 1 1.2 DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION OF GLAUCOMA 7 1.3 EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA 11 1.3.1 PREVALENCE OF PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA 12 1.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Newspapers: Scots Magazine
    244 scots Magazine • NLS open shelf I, v.1 Jan 1739 p. 9 Georgia-colony and Spanish - 'Georgia cannot expect much help from Carol ina.' 't't. I. I p. 47 Charleston SC - smallpox outbreak q~.~.1 I, v.2 Feb 1739 p. 75, passim Border dispute with Spanish, over Carolina, etc.~4'.3.1 I, v.3 Mar 1739' p. 139 Preferments Civil - Mr Gordon, late Secretary to the society for the encouragement of learning - One of His Majesty's council in Carolina 1t~1 p. 140 Preferments Civil - Col. John Pitt - Governor of South Carolina "\4-. 4. ~ I, v.4 Apr 1739 p. 154 Carol ina suggested as possible haven for coloni sts forced out of Georgi a by Spani sh 9tt. 5. \ carolina1752 _ the governor makes a treaty with the Indians, p. 255 q+lO.\ A dreadful hurricane in that province, p. 599 (South Carolina}; ~+.II.I account of storm from Capt. Baker arrived at Bristol from North Carolina, pp. 601-602 'N.\'.k.\-d-. XVIII, 1756 Carolina.by whom first settled, p. 21. possessed by the English in King Charles II's time, p. 22. An account of its government ib., of its productions, p. 23, and of its present state, pp. 23, 24. Indico brought thence (SC) to Britain, p. 236. 'North Carolina is greatly inferior to the southern division. Its trade is not considerable: the inhabitants cure a little tobacco, most of which they send to Virginia, where it is shipped to Europe. The New Englanders are furnished by this province with tar, pitch, turpent.ine, salt pork, skins, a small quantity of tobacco, and sometimes Indian corn.
    [Show full text]