CPES Report July 1-2005 to June 30-2008.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF THE PHILIPPINES (CIAP) PHILIPPINE DOMESTIC CONSTRUCTION BOARD (PDCB) 3/F, Jupiter Bldg., #56 Jupiter St., Bel-Air Village, Makati City Telephone Nos. 896-1801; 897-0791; Fax No. 897-0791 CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT CPES Reports - On-going and Completed Projects from July 1, 2005- June 30, 2008 BACKGROUND: This report is prepared in connection with the REPORT COVERAGE: implementation of Constructors Performance Evaluation System This report contains CPES rating and other project-related (CPES) pursuant to Section 12, Annex E - Evaluation of information of on-going and completed foreign assisted (FA) and Contractors Performance of the Implementing Rules and locally funded (LF) infrastructure projects being undertaken by Regulations (IRR) of RA No. 9184 (Government Procurement either local, foreign or joint venture constructors. The projects Reform Act). Item 4 - Submission and Dissemination of presented in these report covers: road, bridge, housing, building, Evaluation Results of Section 12, specifically mandated PDCB to ports and harbor, irrigation and flood control, and water supply consolidate the CPES evaluation results of all ongoing and projects. completed projects and disseminate the same to all offices/agencies/corporations concerned. REPORT CONTENTS: USES OF CPES INFORMATION: The CPES rating and other information is designed to Presented in this report are the names of constructors serve the information needs of the following: a) government arranged alphabetically with the corresponding project agencies undertaking infrastructure projects; b) industry planners classification. Information available in this report comprises three and decision makers, c) constructors, d) project owners, e) (3) parts, as follows: 1) Constructor General Information; 2) banking and financing institutions, f) insurance companies, g) Project Data; and 3) CPES Rating. consulting firms, h) professional associations, and i) embassies. Information on contractors CPES ratings shall be used for Part 1 of the report includes the name of constructor/s and the following purposes: a) Pre-qualification/Eligibility Screening of PCAB License Number. Constructors; b) Awarding of Contracts; c) Project Monitoring and Control; d) Issuance of Certificate of Completion; e) Policy Formulation/Review; f) Industry Planning; and g) Granting of Information contained in Part 2 pertains to the project Incentives/Awards, and in adopting measure to further improve project name, Implementing Agency, contract amount, and status performance of contractors in the prosecution of government of project (on-going or completed). projects. 1 Part 3 includes data on CPES rating per criteria, as follows: a) workmanship, b) materials, c) time, d) facilities, e) environmental, safety and health, and f) resources deployment, and the CPES visit Rating and over-all /Final Rating and its Qualitative Description. SOURCES OF INFORMATION Data contained in this report were culled from the CPES Summary Report submitted by the *Departments of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Science and Technology (DOST), National Irrigation Administration (NIA), National Housing Authority, Philippine Ports Authority (PPA), Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission (PRRC), and Bases Conversion Development Authority (BCDA) covering the period July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2008. With regards to data on negative slippage, this is when constructor got 0.00 on time this matter may be brought about by any of the three (3) problems: a) Constructor-Related Problems, Agency-Related Problems; and Other Related Problems. Please see the enumerated problems on each classification on page 5 of this cover page. If you need particular information on the reason for the negative slippage of each concerned contractor, please contact the agency implementing the project. For particular information on the data of each of the CPES Reports, please contact the person-in-charge of the concerned implementing agencies listed below: Melrose Pailma (DPWH) Tess Pantalla (NIA) Ma. Otelia F. Eclavea (NHA) Amy Gamay (PRRC) Bong Fortunado (BCDA Tel. Nos. 304-3511 Tel. Nos. 927-0923 Tel. Nos. 928-4561 Tel. Nos. 433-3444 Tel. Nos. 816-6666 Arnaldo C. Reyes (DOST) Arnold Villegas (PPA) Tel. Nos. 837-2071 loc. 2120 527-8356 loc. 356 For further information and queries, you may visit us at Philippine Domestic Construction Board (PDCB), 3rd Floor, Jupiter 1 Building, 56 Jupiter Street, Bel-Air Village, Makati City; call us at 897-0791/896-1801; or e-mail us at [email protected]. You may access this report on this website http://www.gppb.gov.ph. 2 CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (CPES) IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES I. ASPECTS OF EVALUATION 1. During Construction (60% for Horizontal Projects such as Road, Bridge, Ports & Harbor, Irrigation and Flood Control and 70 % for Vertical Projects such as Housing, Building, Power Transmission Line and Substation) - minimum of two (2) visits with the conduct of first visit when the actual project accomplishment is at least 30% except for projects with a duration of 90 calendar days and below which may be subjected to just one (1) final visit. 2. Upon Completion (40 % for Horizontal Projects and 30 % for Vertical Projects)- final visit when the Implementing Office reported 100 % completion II. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION Amended Guidelines as Approved by NEDA Infracom 19 May 2005 During Construction Upon Completion Criteria Maximum Rating Criteria Maximum Rating Workmanship 0.40 Workmanship 0.40 Materials 0.30 Materials 0.30 Time 0.10 Time 0.30 Facilities 0.03 Total 1.00 Environmental, Safety 0.07 and Health (ESH) Resources Deployment 0.10 Total 1.00 3 As approved by NEDA Infracom 30 January 1998 During Construction Upon Completion Criteria Maximum Rating Criteria Maximum Rating Workmanship 0.40 Workmanship 0.40 Materials 0.30 Time 0.50 Time 0.10 Facilities 0.03 Total 1.00 Environmental, Safety 0.07 Resources Deployment 0.10 Total 1.00 III. CPES RATING & ITS QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION AS APPROVED MAY 2005 *CPES RATING/QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION >90% Outstanding >80% but < 90% Very Satisfactory >70% but < 80% Satisfactory >60% but < 70% Fair < 60% Poor 4 UNIFORM CODING SCHEME FOR THE CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (CPES) - IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES *CAUSES OF DELAY CONSTRUCTOR-RELATED PROBLEMS AGENCY RELATED PROBLEMS C-W01 - Insufficient manpower deployed in project site A-VO1- Delays in the approval of variation orders C-EO1 - Breakdown of equipment/equipment not operational A-TO1- Delays in the approval of contract time extension C-EO2 - Lack/Insufficient/Inadequate equipment deployed in project site A-SO1- Delays in the approval of suspension order C-MO1- Lack/Inadequate/Insufficient supply of construction A-DO1- Changes in construction designs Materials A-FO1- Delays in the release of funds C-RO1- Lack of financial resources A-RO1- Right of Way (ROW) acquisition problem (squatter relocation problems, relocation of of utilities, (i.e. PLDT, MERALCO posts and other similar cases) 5 CAUSES OF DELAY OTHER- RELATED PROBLEMS O-WO1- Unfavorable weather condition (Occurrence of natural Calamities; occurrence of flooding/ siltation on site; Unworkable ground condition) O-PO1- Insurgence or peace and order problems/civil disturbances O-TO1- Third Party intervention *Can be a reason for the negative slippage of constructor (please see the CPES reports of constructor from the agency concerned.) 6 CIAP - PDCB CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT CPES Reports - On-going and Completed Projects from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2008 FUNDIN CATEGORY PROJECT DATE of CONTRACT DATE SLIPP CPES NAME of LICENSE NO. of IMPL. G STATU L/F EVALUA DUR AGE WMS MTL TIME FAC ESH RDR VISIT CONSTRUCTOR NO. PCAB ARC TYPE NAME LOCATION VISIT AGENCY SOURC AMOUNT (Php, M) STARTED COMP S TION (C.D.) (%) RATING E Const. of Cemented Footbridge, Sapang Calumpit, 121 Construction 21686 L C SB GE1 05/17/06 Final III LF 0.946 60 01/01/06 03/16/06 0.00 C 0.304 0.285 0.300 - - - 88.90 Bayan Bulacan Const. of MPB @ Bulacan State Malolos, 121 Construction 21686 L D SB GB1 08/18/06 1st III LF 0.945 54 07/17/06 09/09/06 1.00 O 0.356 0.225 0.100 0.030 0.035 0.100 84.60 University Compound Bulacan Sitio Lourdes, 2H2L Construction 16293 L B MA GE1 Conc. of Road @ Package 3-2 Brgy. 03/06/07 1st/Final XI LF 0.565 120 12/08/06 04/06/07 66.84 C 0.343 0.300 0.300 - - - *94.30 Togatto, Davao City Const. (Completion) of Sch. Bldg. @ dela 2H2L Construction 16293 L B SB GB1 Antipolo City 05/30/07 1st/Final IVA LF 0.791 120 03/23/07 07/20/07 42.50 C 0.366 0.200 0.300 - - - *86.60 Paz E/S Brgy. 29-C, 2H2L Construction 16293 L B SB GB1 Const. of MPB @ Jacinto St. 09/05/07 1st/Final XI LF 0.471 105 01/07/07 09/05/07 2.40 C 0.365 0.300 0.300 - - - *96.50 Davao City 2-R Construction & Impvt./Rehab. of PMA Road, PMA Cut=off 15304 L D SB GE1 Baguio City 11/26/07 1st/Final CAR LF 4.811 30 03/22/07 04/20/07 55.96 C 0.260 0.200 0.300 - - - *76.00 Supply Road 1&2 Manolo Completion of Multi-Purpose Bldg., 3E Construction 19588 L B MA GB1 Fortich, 03/03/08 5th X LF 2.365 120 12/27/05 06/20/07 - C 0.335 0.136 0.000 - - - 47.10 (Water District, Phase IV) Tankulan Bukidnon Km.480+000- 310 Construction Asphalt Overlay of Tigaon-Goa-Lagonoy Km.490+000, 4875 L AAA LB GE1 08/27/05 Final V FA 47.945 243 01/26/04 06/12/05 0.20 C 0.450 - 0.500 - - - 95.00 Specialist Corporation Road Camarines Sur Tumana, 310 Construction 4875 L AA LA GE1 Const. of Tumana Bridge (Phase III) Concepcion 11/15/05 Final NCR LF 26.854 180 01/08/05 09/15/05 0.00 C 0.221 0.190 0.300 - - - 71.10 Specialist Corporation I, Marikina City Makati City- 310 Construction Estrella-Pantaleon Bridge Approaches 4875 L AA LA GE1 Manadaluyon 03/06/08 1st NCR LF 38.631 330 04/29/04 02/08/08 1.50 O 0.359 0.200 0.100 0.030 0.047 0.067 80.30 Specialist Corporation (Across Pasig River) g City, M.M.