DOCSLIB.ORG

NSIAD-90-139FS Defense Inventory: Production, Distribution, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NSIAD-90-139FS Defense Inventory: Production, Distribution, And * *! i . i ? ,-l-__*-l__-- -.-....- ITniWtl St.ates Gtwt~ral Acxv~urlt.ing Of’f‘iw ___ Fact, Sheet for t,he Chairman, 3 ’ GAO Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security, Committee on Government; Operations, House of Representatives May I WO DEFENSE INVENTORY Production, Distribution, and Storage of C-4 Explosive 141526 (;hO/NSIAD-!)()-I :S!)FS - Uuited States General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20648 National Security and International Affairs Division B-238708 May 7,199O The Honorable John Conyers, Jr. Chairman, Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: In response to your August 25, 1989, request, we are providing informa- tion on your specific questions regarding C-4 explosive (see app. I). You expressed particular concern about C-4 explosive due to its high demand by paramilitary groups and other illicit organizations. The object of this fact sheet is to describe the production, distribution, and storage of C-4 explosives. In a subsequent report, we will address your concerns about the military departments’ inventory controls over such sensitive mate- rial and the extent of reforms undertaken to safeguard those inventories. We obtained information about C-4 explosives at the U.S. Army Arma- ment, Munitions, and Chemical Command headquarters. We also con- tacted key officials involved in the management of C-4 in the Navy, Air Force, and Defense Logistics Agency. We conducted our review from September 1989 to January 1990 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. As arranged with your office, unless you publicly announce its contents earlier, we plan no further distribution of this fact sheet until 30 days from its issue date. At that time, we will send copies to interested com- mittees and other congressional members; the Secretaries of Defense, the Army, Navy, and Air Force; the Director, Defense Logistics Agency; and the Director, Office of Management and Budget. We will also make cop- ies available to other parties upon request. Page 1 GAO/NSIAD-99.139FS Defense Inventory B-238708 If you have any additional questions, please contact me on 275-8412. GAO staff members who made major contributions to this report are listed in appendix II. Sincerely yours, Donna M. Heivilin Director, Logistics Issues J Page 2 GAO/NSIAD-90-139FS Defense Inventory J Page 3 GAO/NSIAD-90-139FS Defense Inventory Aboendix I .’ Answers to Questions Regarding C-4 Explosive. 1. What is C-4? Composition C-4 is a mixture containing Research Development Explo- sive (RDX)' (91 percent) and a non-explosive plasticizer (9 percent), It is dirty white to light brown in color. C-4 is a semiplastic, putty-like mate- rial. It can be molded over a wide range of temperatures (-700 F to 1700 F) and produces a cutting action when detonated. C-4’s velocity of detonation, the rate at which an explosive changes to a gaseous form, is 26,400 feet per second. Detonation velocities for some other explosive are trinitrotolyene (TNT) (22,600 feet per second); nitro- glycerin (26,200 feet per second); and pure RDX (27,400 feet per second). According to an Army field manual, C-4 is 1.34 times as effective as the same weight of TNT. Table I. 1 shows the following munitions items using C-4 as a component: Table 1.1: Munitions Items With C-4 a8 a Component Pounds of C-4 used Items in each item C-4 Bulk ComDosition. Class 2 60.00 (Per.. box) C-4 Bulk ComDosition, Class 3 60.00 (per box) Projected Charge Ml 57, Center Section 5.00 Charge Assembly, Demolition MK135 20.00 Charae Assemblv. Demolition MK138 20.00 Charge Assembly, Demolition M37 20.00 Charge Assembly, Demolition Ml83 20.00 Charge, Demolition Block M5Al 2.50 Charae, Demolition Block C-4 Ml 12 1.25 Charae, Demolition MK20 2.00 Charge, Demolition Flex Linear 1,750.oo Demolition Line Charge M58 (MICLIC) 1,900.00 Demolition Kit. Proiected Charae Ml73 1500.00 Demolition Line Charge M59 (MICLIC) 1,900.00 Mine, AP M18Al (Claymore) 1.50 Composition C-4 in bulk form is not considered an end item. Thus, the above list shows 13 items or components that use C-4 as a component. ’ RDX (the chemical name is cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine) is a white solid manufactured by the nitration of hexamethylenetetramlne. RDX was first prepared in 1899, but its explosive properties were not discovered until 1920. It was used extensively in World War II as an explosive filler in ammunition. Page 4 GAO/NSIADM-139F’S Defense Inventory Appendix I ANlwert3 to Questions Ibgarding C-4 Explosive 2. Who makes C-4 and is the United States the only producer? The current producers of C-4 are Holston Army Ammunition Plant in Kingsport, Tennessee, and Expro Chemical Products Inc. of Canada. In addition, the U.S. Army Armament, Munitions, and Chemical Command (AMCCOM) identified’the Lone Star, Newport, Sunflower, and Louisiana Army Ammunition Plants as C-4 producers for mobilization. 3. Does C-4 have a legitimate civilian use? Civilians may use C-4 as an initiator for other explosives or in underwa- ter seismic charges. RDX, the explosive component of C-4, is also used in blasting caps and in other commercial explosives. 4. Is C-4 legally available to civilians? C-4 is not available for purchase from the Holston Army Ammunition Plant by non-military users. The Defense Reutilization Marketing Office sells C-4 determined to be unusable by the military to non-military users. The Reutilization Marketing Office allows only those persons who have valid end-use permits and are licensed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to bid on surplus explosives. These sales are con- ducted through competitive bids. Table I.2 shows the bidders the Reu- tilization Marketing Office sold C-4 to from February 1986 through September 1987.2 Table 1.2 Non-Mllltary Purcharers of C-4 Pounds of Buyer composition C-4 sold Demex International Ltd. 12,013 Hi Tech Inc. 4,286 Thunderbird Cartridge Co. 1,472 Total 17,771 The U.S. Forest Service, the U. S. Department of State, and the US Bureau of Mines have ordered C-4 in the past. 6. Who may legitimately purchase C-4 and under what kinds of restrictions? 2Accorcling to the Defense Logistics Agency, its Reutilization Marketing Office did not sell any C-4 in fiscal years 1988 and 1989. Page 5 GAO/NSIAD-SO-139PS Defense Inventory Appendix I Answexu to Qneetions Regarding C-4 Explosive The Defense Reutilization Marketing Office allows only those persons who have valid end-use permits and are licensed by the Bureau of Alco- hol, Tobacco and Firearms to bid on surplus explosives. 6. What U.S. agencies control the (a) production, (b) storage, (c) dis- tribution, (d) use, and (e) disposal of C-4? The AMCCOM directorates and Army organizations that have these responsibilities with respect to C-4 and ammunition items that use C-4 at the wholesale3 level are shown in table 1.3. Table 1.3: Organizations With Responsibility for C-4 Production AMCCOM Production Directorate Dlatrlbutlon AMCCOM Defense Ammunition Directorate and AMCCOM Transportation Directorate Storage AMCCOM Defense Ammunition Directorate and Depot Systems Command Various end users control use at the retail level. Specifically, the Army major commands control use for the Army. The other services control their own use. Disposltlon AMCCOM Production Directorate, AMCCOM Defense Ammunition Directorate, and the Defense Reutilization Marketing Office are resoonsible for disbosina unserviceable C-4. 7. What is the shelf life of C-4? According to AMCCOM officials, if C-4 is properly stored and kept from extreme heat, its shelf life is considered to be indefinite. 8. What parts of the control cycle seem most vulnerable? According to AhKXOM officials, C-4 explosive and other sensitive materi- als are most vulnerable to pilferage or loss at the retail level where it is used for training. Maintaining inventory controls at the retail level is difficult. At the user level, C-4 is broken down into smaller quantities (such as individual demolition blocks), thus making it easier to steal. According to the Director of the Defense Ammunition Directorate, there is much better control over inventories at the wholesale level. To further substantiate their position, the Ammunition Directorate officials certi- fied in writing that they have made no inventory adjustments involving 3The wholesale system is comprised of the inventory control points, which determine inventory requirements and procure the items; the distribution depots, which receive, store, and issue stock to retail activities; and factories. The retail system is comprised of numerous supply support activities at bases and installations throughout the world. Page 6 GA0/NSIA.D90439FS Defexwe Inventory Appendix I Answers to Questions Regarding CL4 Explosive items containing C-4 over the past 2 years at any wholesale location storing this material. 9. Can C-4 be homemade? According to AMCCOM officials, C-4 would be hard to make at home because RDX (the explosive component) is difficult to obtain. Production of RDX is difficult, expensive, and requires advanced production techniques. 10. Is the production process dangerous? AMCCOM officials do not consider the production process to be particu- larly dangerous. In over 40 years of operation, the Holston Army Ammunition Plant (the manufacturer of C-4) has had only one fatality. C-4 does not require special handling beyond that needed in explosives manufacturing or military use of explosives. According to an AMCCOM document, C-4 is manufactured by putting wet RDX into a stainless steel mixing kettle and then adding the plastic binder.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Report for SERDP WP-2209 Replacement Melt-Castable Formulations for Composition B
    LA-UR-17-24143 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Title: Final report for SERDP WP-2209 Replacement melt-castable formulations for Composition B Author(s): Leonard, Philip Francois, Elizabeth Green Intended for: Report Issued: 2017-05-19 Disclaimer: Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. By approving this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this article as work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher's right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness. Final report for SERDP WP-2209 Replacement melt-castable formulations for Composition B Elizabeth Francois; Philip Leonard, M-7 Los Alamos National Laboratory With technical contributions from Philip Samuels, ARDEC Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explosives and Terminal Ballistics
    AND TERMINAL BALLISTICS A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE AAF SCIEN'rIFIC ADVISORY GROUP By D. P. MAC DOUGALL Naval Ordnance Laboratory, Washington, D. C. N. M. NEWMARK Department oj Civil Engineering, University oj Illinois • PMblished May, 1946 by HEADQUARTERS AIR MATERIEL COMMAND PUBLICATIONS BRANCH, INTEJtJYiE~9) '1001 WRIGHT FIELD, DAYTON, OHIO V-46579 The AAF Scientific Advisory Group was activated late in 1944 by General of the Army H. H. Arnold. He se­ cured the services of Dr. Theodore von Karman, re­ nowned scientist and consultant in aeronautics, who agreed to organize and direct the group. Dr. von Karman gathered about him a group of Ameri­ can scientists from every field of research having a bearing on air power. These men then analyzed im­ portant developments in the basic sciences, both here and abroad, and attempted to evaluate the effects of their application to air power. This volume is one of a group of reports made to the Army Air Forces by the Scientific Advisory Group. Thil document contolnl Information affecting the notional defenle of the United Statel within the meaning of the Espionage Ad, SO U. S. C., 31 and 32, 01 amended. Its tronsmiulon or the revelation of Its contents In any manner to on unauthorized person II prohibited by low. AAF SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY GROUP Dr. Th. von Karman Director Colonel F. E. Glantzberg Dr. H. L. Dryden Deputy Director, Military Deputy Director, Scientific Lt Col G. T. McHugh, Executive Capt C. H. Jackson, Jr., Secretary CONSULTANTS Dr. C. W. Bray Dr. A. J. Stosick Dr. L. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Composition C-4: Towards an Alternate Binder and Reduced Sensitivity
    Recent Developments in Composition C-4: Towards an Alternate Binder and Reduced Sensitivity NDIA Insensitive Munitions & Energetic Materials Technology Symposium 2009 Jim Owens* BAE SYSTEMS OSI, Holston Army Ammunition Plant Paul Vinh RDECOM-ARDEC, Picatinny Arsenal IMEMTS 2009 – Tucson, AZ Cleared for Public Release by BAE Systems 1 Presentation Outline • Research Extrudable Moldable Insensitive eXplosive (OSX-REMIX) • Background • Program Objectives • Technical Approach • Formulation and Evaluation • Summary • Alternate Plastic-binder Extrudable eXplosive (OSX-APEX) • Background • Program Objectives • Technical Approach • Formulation • Modified Accelerated Aging Trial • Summary IMEMTS 2009 – Tucson, AZ Cleared for Public Release by BAE Systems 2 Acknowledgement • PM-CCS • Mr. Felix Costa • RDECOM-ARDEC • Mr. Paul Vinh • Mr. Sanjeev Singh • Mr. Gregory Tremarco • BAE SYSTEMS OSI • Mr. Jim Haynes • Ms. Kelly Guntrum • Mr. Alberto Carrillo • Mr. Matt Hathaway • Mr. Brian Alexander IMEMTS 2009 – Tucson, AZ Cleared for Public Release by BAE Systems 3 OSX-REMIX – Program Objectives • Composition C-4 already fares well in the arena of insensitivity, due to relatively large amount of binder. • Passes Bullet Impact and Fragment Impact (Army) sensitivity tests at ambient temperature. • Fails shock stimulus – Sympathetic Detonation and Shaped Charge Jet. • BAE’s task – to develop an alternate extrudable formulation with similar physical and energy output characteristics, while enhancing its insensitivity. • Maintain current binder configuration for comparison to standard C-4. • Identify modifications to process or alternate input energetics. • Formulate and evaluate physical and energetic properties. IMEMTS 2009 – Tucson, AZ Cleared for Public Release by BAE Systems 4 OSX-REMIX – Technical Approach • Modification to manufacturing process. • Maintain aqueous slurry-coating process. • Premixing RDX with fluid portion of binder (DOA/Oil).
    [Show full text]
  • Tnt Equivalence of C-4 and Pe4: a Review of Traditional Sources and Recent Data
    TNT EQUIVALENCE OF C-4 AND PE4: A REVIEW OF TRADITIONAL SOURCES AND RECENT DATA D. Bogosian1, M. Yokota1, S. Rigby2 1Baker Engineering and Risk Consultants, 360 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Ste 1090, El Segundo, CA 90245, USA; 2University of Sheffield, Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Sir Frederick Mappin Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Since standard engineering-level blast models are typically developed to predict airblast parameters (pressure and impulse) from TNT bursts, prediction of airblast from other materials uses an equivalence factor by which an equivalent TNT weight is computed and used in the source term of the model. This approach is widespread in the industry and has been codified in numerous manuals, books, and papers. A recent effort co-sponsored by TSWG (U.S.) and FSTD (Singapore) collected and compiled equivalence data for a wide variety of explosive materials (both military grade as well as home-made) into a single software tool named STREET. The database thus assembled provides a comprehensive and expandable repository for equivalence data. Two of the main achievements in STREET are the consideration of equivalence as a function of scaled standoff (rather than a scalar), and the documentation of uncertainty in the estimated value. In this paper, we consider specifically the manual- and test-derived data related to Composition C-4, and as a first step, we draw some judgments regarding the equivalence implicit in blast curves provided by UFC 3-340-02, for both pressure and impulse. Next, we consider PE4, which is similar in composition to C-4 and is used widely in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Explosives
    History and Present DIRECTORS of VUPCH Plastic Explosives Research Institute of Industrial Chemistry (VÚPCH) with its seat in Pardubice-Semtín was established by the Ministry of Defense Decree of November 2nd, 1953 to In the fifties of the last century the research and later the industrial production January 1st 1954 as a state administration facility with the scope of activities - research and development of explosives. VÚPCH was entitled to administrate research of plastic explosives based on High explosives and non-explosive plasticizer workplaces of national enterprise Synthesia, and experts were centralized there from the original research department, the so-called Central Laboratories of the was started in VCHZ (today known as Explosia). ® company, and technological groups of the former Explosia. The activity of VÚPCH continuously linked up to the activity of departments R and X that had been entrusted Plastic explosives from Explosia are known under the trade name Semtex . with research, development and testing within the framework of Explosia a.s. since 1923. From the beginning, the newly established research institute (VÚPCH) was the author of the technical solutions of plastic explosives as well as most of the By the Ministry of Chemical Industry Decree of December 30th, 1958 VÚPCH was abolished as an independent budgetary organization and to the date of January 1st, production equipment. 1959 transferred into administration of national enterprise East Bohemian Chemical Works Synthesia. Within the framework of Synthesia there were, however, some changes in actual organizational incorporation of VÚPCH, especially in connexion with establishing the position of Deputy for Special Production in the 1970s, and the Pl Np 10 (The Black Semtex) Plant 05 Special Production in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Texhuka U Memodbi Hdepho-(Pii3weckozo 3Kcnepumehma
    TexHUKa u Memodbi HdepHO-(pii3wecKozo 3KcnepuMeHma HanpaBJieHHoro pacxoxgieHHa. Jljin BbiMHCJieHHfl Marpmrbi OTKJiHKa HaimcaHa nporpaMMa, OCHO- BaHHaa Ha Hcnonb30BaHHH Meroaa MoHTe-Kapjio. IlpH pacneTe MaipHUbi yHHTbmaioTca npaKTH- qecKH Bee 4>H3HHecKHe npoixeccbi, npOTeicaiomHe B CHeraiKax no,zjo6Horo THna. H3JiyHeHHe npaiamecKH JiK>6oro HCTOHHHKa HefirpOHOB conpoBO^caaeTca HcnycKaHHeM conyrcTByiomHx y-KBaHTOB. IIponopUHOHajibHbie ra30Bbie cneTHHKH, KaK H 6ojibuiHHCTBO aerrcK- TOpOB, HCnOJIb3yeMbIX JUW perHCTpaUHH HeHTpOHOB, HyBCTBHTeJIbHbl H K Y"H3JiyHeHHK). Il03T0My Y-(J)OH MOHcer BHOCHTB HCKa^ceHHfl B BoccTaHaBJiHBaeMbie HeihpoHHbie pacnpeaejieHHa. B HC- nojib3yeMOM HeihpoHHOM cneicrpoMeTpe raMMa-4)OH OKa3biBaeT BJIHHHHC B zmana30He SHeprafi OT 0 flo 0,5 MsB. J\o HacToamero BpeMeHH yneT Y-4>0Ha npOBOflHJica pacneTHbiM nyreM. OflHaico BbiHHCJieHHe Y-OTKJiHKa He Bceraa flaer HafleacHbie pe3ynbTaTbi H BHOCHT aonojiHHTejibHbie norpeumocTH B o6jiacTH 3HepraH H©HTPOHOB HHMce 0,5 MsB. KapflHHajibHMM peiueHHeM 3TOH npo6jieMU HBJM- 0113 eTCH pa3pa6oTKa CHCTCMW zmcKpHMHHauHH y-^ ' npHHUHn fleficTBHa KOTopofi ocHOBaH Ha CymeCTBCHHOM pa3JIHHHH yfl&IIbHOH HOHH3aUHH, BbI3BaHHOH npOTOHOM OTflaHH OT HeirrpoHa n sjieinpoHOM, o6pa3yiomHMCfl npn B3aHM0fleHCTBHH Y-KBairra c BemecTBOM. OflHaKO JlO C03flaHHH TaKOH CHCTeMbI Heo6xOflHMO 6bIJIO HCCJieflOBaTb B03MOHCHOCTb flHC- 0Ha 1 KpHMHHauHH Y-<J> W * Hcnojib3yeMoro cHeTHHKa H oueHHTb HHXCHHH 3HepreTHHecKHH nopor pa3fleJieHHfl HMnyjlbCOB OT HeHTpOHOB H Y-KBaHTOB. JiflSL 3TOrO C nOMOIUbK) UH(^pOBOrO 0CUHJ1J10- rpacj)a c naMflTbio 6bin nojiyneH MaccHB aaHHbix o 4>opMe HMnyjlbCOB cneTHHKa npH ero o6jiy*ie- HHH HeiiTpoHaMH H Y"KBaHTaMH. B KanecTBe HCTOHHHKa CMeuiaHHoro HefiTpoHHoro H Y-H3Jiy- 252 HeHHH Hcnojib3o8ajicfl Cf, HCTOHHHKOM Y-H3Jiy4eHHH cjiyaauiH CJIOH H3 Ha6opa o6pa3UOBbix cneinpoMeTpHHecKHX Y-HCTOHHHKOB. Bcero 3a BpeMa npoBe,aeHHa H3MepeHHH 6buio 3anncaHO 4 =5-10 ocuHJiJiorpaMM HMnyjlbCOB mix HCTOHHHKa CMeuiaHHoro HefiTpoHHoro H Y-H3JiyieHH« 252 4 Cf H ~ 1 • 10 OCUHJIJIOrpaMM flfla HCTOHHHKa Y-KBaHTOB.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Fume Comparison of a Few Explosives Used in Trench Blasting
    Toxic Fume Comparison of a Few Explosives Used in Trench Blasting By Marcia L. Harris, Michael J. Sapko, and Richard J. Mainiero National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Pittsburgh Research Laboratory ABSTRACT Since 1988, there have been 17 documented incidents in the United States and Canada in which carbon monoxide (CO) is suspected to have migrated through ground strata into occupied enclosed spaces as a result of proximate trench blasting or surface mine blasting. These incidents resulted in 39 suspected or medically verified carbon monoxide poisonings and one fatality. To better understand the factors contributing to this hazard, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) carried out studies in a 12-foot diameter sphere to identify key factors that may enhance the levels of CO associated with the detonation of several commercial trenching explosives. The gaseous detonation products from emulsions, a watergel, and ANFO blasting agents as well as gelatin dynamite, TNT, and Pentolite boosters were measured in an argon atmosphere and compared with those for the same explosives detonated in air. Test variables included explosive formulation, wrapper, aluminum addition, oxygen balance, and density. Major contributing factors to CO production, under these laboratory test conditions, are presented. The main finding is the high CO production associated with the lack of afterburning in an oxygen poor atmosphere. Fumes measurements are compared with the manufacturer’s reported IME fume class and with the Federal Relative Toxicity Standard 30 CFR Part 15 in order to gain an understanding of the relative toxicity of some explosives used in trench blasting. INTRODUCTION Toxic gases such as CO and NO are produced by the detonation of explosives.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 EXPLOSIVES
    Chapter 2 EXPLOSIVES This chapter classifies commercial blasting compounds according to their explosive class and type. Initiating devices are listed and described as well. Military explosives are treated separately. The ingredi- ents and more significant properties of each explosive are tabulated and briefly discussed. Data are sum- marized from various handbooks, textbooks, and manufacturers’ technical data sheets. THEORY OF EXPLOSIVES In general, an explosive has four basic characteristics: (1) It is a chemical compound or mixture ignited by heat, shock, impact, friction, or a combination of these conditions; (2) Upon ignition, it decom- poses rapidly in a detonation; (3) There is a rapid release of heat and large quantities of high-pressure gases that expand rapidly with sufficient force to overcome confining forces; and (4) The energy released by the detonation of explosives produces four basic effects; (a) rock fragmentation; (b) rock displacement; (c) ground vibration; and (d) air blast. A general theory of explosives is that the detonation of the explosives charge causes a high-velocity shock wave and a tremendous release of gas. The shock wave cracks and crushes the rock near the explosives and creates thousands of cracks in the rock. These cracks are then filled with the expanding gases. The gases continue to fill and expand the cracks until the gas pressure is too weak to expand the cracks any further, or are vented from the rock. The ingredients in explosives manufactured are classified as: Explosive bases. An explosive base is a solid or a liquid which, upon application or heat or shock, breaks down very rapidly into gaseous products, with an accompanying release of heat energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraction-Based Recovery of RDX from Obsolete Composition B
    G Model JIEC 3540 1–5 Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jiec 1 Extraction-based recovery of RDX from obsolete Composition B 2 Q1 a a a a, b Hyewon Kang , Hyejoo Kim , Chang-Ha Lee , Ik-Sung Ahn *, Keun Deuk Lee 3 a Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, South Korea 4 b Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon 305-600, South Korea A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Received 3 November 2016 Recovery of explosives from obsolete ammunition has been considered an eco-friendly alternative to Received in revised form 20 July 2017 conventional dumping or detonation disposal methods Composition B, made of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene Accepted 26 July 2017 (TNT), hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), and paraffin wax, has been used as the main Available online xxx explosive filling in various munitions. It was selected as a model explosive for this study. TNT was extracted from Composition B by exploiting the different solubilities of TNT and RDX in acetonitrile. After Keywords: removing paraffin wax by hexane washing, RDX was recovered from unused Composition B with a purity Composition B higher than 99% and a yield of 84%. Recovery © 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering RDX Chemistry. Extraction Demilitarization 5 29 Introduction destroyed using the following techniques: dumping at sea, outdoor 30 burning, open detonation, and detonation in a mine tunnel [9,10].
    [Show full text]
  • A NARROW- BEAM X - RAY ATTENUATION of PHOTONS 0.05 - 0.5 Mev in CHEMICAL EXPLOSIVES
    The Sixth International Conference "Modern Problems of Nuclear Physics", September 19-22,2006 _ _ _ INP-SO A NARROW- BEAM X - RAY ATTENUATION OF PHOTONS 0.05 - 0.5 MeV IN CHEMICAL EXPLOSIVES Cherkasov A.S. National University, Kharkov, Ukraine UZ0603199 Basic explosives [1] are - Tetryl (CeHsNsOg); Hexamethylenetetramine (urotropin) (HMT- C6Hi2N4); 2,4,6 - Trinitrotoluene (TNT - C7H5N3O3); 1,3 - Dinitrobenzene (DNB - C6H4N2O4); Picric acid (2,4,6 - trinitrophenol - C6H3N3O7); TATP (C9Hig06); Hexogen (RDX - C3H6N6O6); Pentaeritronitrate-Nitropenta (PETN - C5H8N4O12); Octogen (HMX - C^NgOg). RDX and/or PETN are usually used in plastic explosives. Examples include C-4, Detasheet, and Semtex). HMX (Octogen) is a very powerful and expensive military explosive, which has been employed in solid-fuel rocket propellants and in military high performance warheads. Currently used military explosives are mostly a combination of TNT, RDX, PETN, HMX, with a number of organic compounds (waxes (e.g. nitroparaffine - C10H8N2O4), plasticizers, stabliers, oil, etc.); example Composition B (RDX, TNT), Composition C-4 (or PE-4) (RDX), Detasheet (PETN), Octol (HMX, TNT), Semtex-H (RDX, PETN), etc. Nitroglycerin (NG - C3H5N3O9)5 Nitrocellulose (QKWMONCfefc. C6H803(ON02)2, C6H9O4(ONO2)) and Ammonium Nitrate (AN - H4N2C>3) are used as a basis of other families of explosives: a) dynamites in case of NG with nitroglycol (C4H8N2O2), powders of Al or Mg, with TNT and ammonal (TNT with Al-powder), wood flour, etc.; b) white(smokeless) gunpowders(guncotton-nitrocotton - collodion cotton, pyroxylinies (e.g. tetranitrate of pulp - colodion wool - C^HigOeONTC^), cordites, ballistites with ammonium perclorate (NH4CIO4) as oxidizer. Dynamites are typically used as a high explosive for industrial applications and in solid rocket propellants.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Monroe Messinger's Memoirs
    Monroe Messinger and the Manhattan Project The insignia of the Special Engineer Detachment City College (CCNY) was a wonderful school when I arrived there in 1939. Nine graduates from the classes of 1935 to 1954 went on to win the Nobel Prize. That was but one of many indicators of the institution's distinction in mid-century America. Created in the 19th century to provide quality higher education for the children of America's immigrants, City College was rigorously selective but tuition free. It was a public transport hike from St. Albans, Long Island, where my parents had moved from Brooklyn, to City College's 35-acre campus on a hill overlooking Harlem. I took a bus to get to Jamaica, Long Island, and then two subways to get to campus. It was a significant commute of about an hour each way, but I was able to study en route and the education I received as I pursued my chemistry major was indisputably first rate. We saw the war on the horizon when I arrived at CCNY in that troubled time. I was aware of anti-Semitism from my own experience and certainly conscious of the frightening aspects of Hitler's Nazi Germany, but I can't say that I was remotely aware of the cataclysmic dimension of the evil engulfing Europe and the Jews. When I was two years into my college career, The United States was at war and my peers were rapidly leaving school and the neighborhood for the military. I wanted an education, but also wanted to do my part for the common good, so along with many of my classmates I joined the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Shock Initiation Experiments and Modeling of Composition B and C-4
    UCRL-CONF-222137 SHOCK INITIATION EXPERIMENTS AND MODELING OF COMPOSITION B AND C-4 Paul A. Urtiew, Kevin S. Vandersall, Craig M. Tarver, Frank Garcia, Jerry W. Forbes June 16, 2006 13th International Detonation Symposium Norfolk, VA, United States July 23, 2006 through July 28, 2006 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. SHOCK INITIATION EXPERIMENTS AND MODELING OF COMPOSITION B AND C-4 Paul A. Urtiew1, Kevin S. Vandersall1, Craig M. Tarver1, Frank Garcia1, and Jerry W. Forbes2 1Energetic Materials Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550 2Center for Energetic Concepts Development, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Abstract. Shock initiation experiments on the explosives Composition B and C- 4 were performed to obtain in-situ pressure gauge data for the purpose of determining the Ignition and Growth reactive flow model with proper modeling parameters.
    [Show full text]