DOCSLIB.ORG

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT § 172.101

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT § 172.101 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT § 172.101 TABLE 2 TO APPENDIX A—RADIONUCLIDES— APPENDIX B TO § 172.101—LIST OF MARINE Continued POLLUTANTS 1. See § 171.4 of this subchapter for applica- (2)— bility to marine pollutants. This appendix Atomic (3)—Reportable (1)—Radionuclide Num- Quantity (RQ) lists potential marine pollutants as defined ber Ci (TBq) in § 171.8 of this subchapter. 2. Marine pollutants listed in this appendix Xenon-122 ............................... 54 100 (3.7) are not necessarily listed by name in the Xenon-123 ............................... 54 10 (.37) § 172.101 Table. If a marine pollutant not list- Xenon-125 ............................... 54 100 (3.7) ed by name or by synonym in the § 172.101 Xenon-127 ............................... 54 100 (3.7) Table meets the definition of any hazard Xenon-129m ............................ 54 1000 (37) Class 1 through 8, then you must determine Xenon-131m ............................ 54 1000 (37) the class and division of the material in ac- Xenon-133 ............................... 54 1000 (37) cordance with § 173.2a of this subchapter. You Xenon-133m ............................ 54 1000 (37) Xenon-135 ............................... 54 100 (3.7) must also select the most appropriate haz- Xenon-135m ............................ 54 10 (.37) ardous material description and proper ship- Xenon-138 ............................... 54 10 (.37) ping name. If a marine pollutant not listed Ytterbium-162 .......................... 70 1000 (37) by name or by synonym in the § 172.101 Table Ytterbium-166 .......................... 70 10 (.37) does not meet the definition of any Class 1 Ytterbium-167 .......................... 70 1000 (37) through 8, then you must offer it for trans- Ytterbium-169 .......................... 70 10 (.37) portation under the most appropriate of the Ytterbium-175 .......................... 70 100 (3.7) following two Class 9 entries: ‘‘Environ- Ytterbium-177 .......................... 70 1000 (37) mentally hazardous substances, liquid, Ytterbium-178 .......................... 70 1000 (37) n.o.s.,’’ UN3082, or ‘‘Environmentally haz- Yttrium-86 ................................ 39 10 (.37) ardous substances, solid, n.o.s.’’ UN3077. Yttrium-86m ............................. 39 1000 (37) 3. This appendix contains two columns. Yttrium-87 ................................ 39 10 (.37) The first column, entitled ‘‘S.M.P.’’ (for se- Yttrium-88 ................................ 39 10 (.37) vere marine pollutants), identifies whether a Yttrium-90 ................................ 39 10 (.37) material is a severe marine pollutant. If the Yttrium-90m ............................. 39 100 (3.7) letters ‘‘PP’’ appear in this column for a ma- Yttrium-91 ................................ 39 10 (.37) terial, the material is a severe marine pol- Yttrium-91m ............................. 39 1000 (37) lutant, otherwise it is not. The second col- Yttrium-92 ................................ 39 100 (3.7) umn, entitled ‘‘Marine Pollutant’’ , lists the Yttrium-93 ................................ 39 100 (3.7) marine pollutants. Yttrium-94 ................................ 39 1000 (37) 4. If a material is not listed in this appen- Yttrium-95 ................................ 39 1000 (37) dix and meets the criteria for a marine pol- Zinc-62 ..................................... 30 100 (3.7) lutant as provided in Chapter 2.10 of the Zinc-63 ..................................... 30 1000 (37) Zinc-65 ..................................... 30 10 (.37) IMDG Code, ‘‘Guidelines for the Identifica- Zinc-69 ..................................... 30 1000 (37) tion of Harmful Substances in Packaged Zinc-69m .................................. 30 100 (3.7) Form’’ (incorporated by reference; see § 171.7 Zinc-71m .................................. 30 100 (3.7) of this subchapter), the material may be Zinc-72 ..................................... 30 100 (3.7) transported as a marine pollutant in accord- Zirconium-86 ............................ 40 100 (3.7) ance with the applicable requirements of Zirconium-88 ............................ 40 10 (.37) this subchapter. Zirconium-89 ............................ 40 100 (3.7) 5. If a material listed in this appendix does Zirconium-93 ............................ 40 1 (.037) not meet the criteria for a marine pollutant Zirconium-95 ............................ 40 10 (.37) as provided in Chapter 2.10 of the IMDG Zirconium-97 ............................ 40 10 (.37) Code, ‘‘Guidelines for the Identification of $ The RQs for all radionuclides apply to chemical com- Harmful Substances in Packaged Form’’ (in- pounds containing the radionuclides and elemental forms re- corporated by reference; see § 171.7 of this gardless of the diameter of pieces of solid material. subchapter), it may be excepted from the re- † The RQ of one curie applies to all radionuclides not other- quirements of this subchapter as a marine wise listed. Whenever the RQs in TABLE 1—HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OTHER THAN RADIONUCLIDES and this pollutant if that exception is approved by table conflict, the lowest RQ shall apply. For example, uranyl the Associate Administrator. acetate and uranyl nitrate have RQs shown in TABLE 1 of 100 pounds, equivalent to about one-tenth the RQ level for uranium-238 in this table. LIST OF MARINE POLLUTANTS ** The method to determine the RQs for mixtures or solu- tions of radionuclides can be found in paragraph 7 of the note S.M.P. Marine pollutant preceding TABLE 1 of this appendix. RQs for the following (1) (2) four common radionuclide mixtures are provided: radium-226 in secular equilibrium with its daughters (0.053 curie); natural Acetone cyanohydrin, stabilized uranium (0.1 curie); natural uranium in secular equilibrium Acetylene tetrabromide with its daughters (0.052 curie); and natural thorium in secular Acetylene tetrachloride equilibrium with its daughters (0.011 curie). Acraldehyde, inhibited *** Indicates that the name was added by PHMSA because it appears in the list of radionuclides in 49 CFR 173.435. The Acrolein, inhibited reportable quantity (RQ), if not specifically listed elsewhere in Acrolein, stabilized this appendix, shall be determined in accordance with the pro- Acrylic aldehyde, inhibited cedures in paragraph 7 of this appendix. Alcohol C-12 - C-16 poly(1-6) ethoxylate 327 VerDate Aug<31>2005 07:50 Nov 14, 2008 Jkt 214210 PO 00000 Frm 00337 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\214210.XXX 214210 erowe on PROD1PC63 with CFR § 172.101 49 CFR Ch. I (10–1–08 Edition) LIST OF MARINE POLLUTANTS—Continued LIST OF MARINE POLLUTANTS—Continued S.M.P. Marine pollutant S.M.P. Marine pollutant (1) (2) (1) (2) Alcohol C-6 - C-17 (secondary)poly(3-6) ethoxylate Chlorodinitrobenzenes, liquid or solid Aldicarb 1-Chloroheptane PP Aldrin 1-Chlorohexane Alkyl (c12-c14) dimethylamine Chloronitroanilines Alkyl (c7-c9) nitrates Chloronitrotoluenes, liquid Alkybenzenesulphonates, branched and straight Chloronitrotoluenes, solid chain (excluding C11–C13 straight chain or 1-Chlorooctane branched chain homologues) PP Chlorophenolates, liquid Allyl bromide PP Chlorophenolates, solid ortho-Aminoanisole Chlorophenyltrichlorosilane Aminocarb Chloropicrin Ammonium dinitro-o-cresolate alpha-Chloropropylene n-Amylbenzene Chlorotoluenes (meta-;para-) PP Azinphos-ethyl PP Chlorpyriphos PP Azinphos-methyl PP Chlorthiophos Barium cyanide Cocculus Bendiocarb Coconitrile Benomyl Copper acetoarsenite Benquinox Copper arsenite Benzyl chlorocarbonate PP Copper chloride Benzyl chloroformate PP Copper chloride solution PP Binapacryl PP Copper cyanide N,N-Bis (2-hydroxyethyl) oleamide (LOA) PP Copper metal powder PP Brodifacoum PP Copper sulphate, anhydrous, hydrates Bromine cyanide Coumachlor Bromoacetone PP Coumaphos Bromoallylene PP Cresyl diphenyl phosphate Bromobenzene Crotonaldehyde, stabilized ortho-Bromobenzyl cyanide Crotonic aldehyde, stabilized Bromocyane Crotoxyphos Bromoform Cupric arsenite PP Bromophos-ethyl PP Cupric chloride 3-Bromopropene PP Cupric cyanide Bromoxynil PP Cupric sulfate Butanedione Cupriethylenediamine solution 2-Butenal, stabilized PP Cuprous chloride Butyl benzyl phthalate Cyanide mixtures N-tert-butyl-N-cyclopropyl-6-methylthio-1,3,5-triazine- Cyanide solutions 2,4-diamine Cyanides, inorganic, n.o.s. 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol Cyanogen bromide PP 2, 6-Di-tert-Butylphenol Cyanogen chloride, inhibited para-tertiary-butyltoluene Cyanogen chloride, stabilized PP Cadmium compounds Cyanophos Cadmium sulphide PP 1,5,9-Cyclododecatriene Calcium arsenate PP Cyhexatin Calcium arsenate and calcium arsenite, mixtures, PP Cymenes (o-;m-;p-) solid PP Cypermethrin Calcium cyanide Decyl acrylate PP Camphechlor PP DDT Carbaryl Decycloxytetrahydrothiophene dioxide Carbendazim DEF Carbofuran Desmedipham Carbon tetrabromide Di-allate Carbon tetrachloride Di-n-Butyl phthalate PP Carbophenothion PP Dialifos Cartap hydrochloride 4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane PP Chlordane PP Diazinon Chlorfenvinphos 1,3-Dibromobenzene PP Chlorinated paraffins (C-10 - C-13) PP Dichlofenthion PP Chlorinated paraffins (C14–C17), with more than 1% Dichloroanilines shorter chain length 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Chlorine 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Chlorine cyanide, inhibited Dichlorobenzene (meta-; para-) Chlormephos 2,2-Dichlorodiethyl ether Chloroacetone, stabilized Dichlorodimethyl ether, symmetrical 1-Chloro-2,3-Epoxypropane Di-(2-chloroethyl) ether 2-Chloro-6-nitrotoluene 1,1-Dichloroethylene, inhibited 4-Chloro-2-nitrotoluene 1,6-Dichlorohexane Chloro-ortho-nitrotoluene Dichlorophenyltrichlorosilane 2-Chloro-5-trifluoromethylnitrobenzene
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Restricted Use Product Summary Report
    Page 1 of 17 Restricted Use Product Summary Report (January 19, 2016) Percent Active Registration # Name Company # Company Name Active Ingredient(s) Ingredient 4‐152 BONIDE ORCHARD MOUSE BAIT 4 BONIDE PRODUCTS, INC. 2 Zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) 70‐223 RIGO EXOTHERM TERMIL 70 VALUE GARDENS SUPPLY, LLC 20 Chlorothalonil 100‐497 AATREX 4L HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 42.6 Atrazine 100‐585 AATREX NINE‐O HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 88.2 Atrazine 100‐669 CURACRON 8E INSECTICIDE‐MITICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 73 Profenofos 100‐817 BICEP II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐827 BICEP LITE II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 28.1; 35.8 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐886 BICEP MAGNUM 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33.7; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐898 AGRI‐MEK 0.15 EC MITICIDE/INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2 Abamectin 100‐903 DENIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2.15 Emamectin benzoate 100‐904 PROCLAIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 5 Emamectin benzoate 100‐998 KARATE 1EC 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1075 FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 3 Tefluthrin Acetochlor; Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl‐ 100‐1083 DOUBLEPLAY SELECTIVE HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 16.9; 67.8 , S‐ethyl ester 100‐1086 KARATE EC‐W INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1088 SCIMITAR GC INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION,
    [Show full text]
  • Global Insecticide Use for Vector-Borne Disease Control
    WHO/CDS/NTD/WHOPES/GCDPP/2007.2 GLOBAL INSECTICIDE USE FOR VECTOR-BORNE DISEASE CONTROL M. Zaim & P. Jambulingam DEPARTMENT OF CONTROL OF NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES (NTD) WHO PESTICIDE EVALUATION SCHEME (WHOPES) First edition, 2002 Second edition, 2004 Third edition, 2007 © World Health Organization 2007 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The named authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication. CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements i Introduction 1 Collection of information 2 Data analysis and observations on reporting 3 All uses in vector control 6 Malaria vector control 22 Dengue vector control 38 Chagas disease vector control 48 Leishmaniasis vector control 52 Other vector-borne disease control 56 Selected insecticides – DDT 58 Selected insecticides – Insect growth regulators 60 Selected insecticides – Bacterial larvicides 62 Country examples 64 Annex 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cypermethrin
    International Environmental Health Criteria 82 Cypermethrin Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1989 Other titles available in the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA series include: 1. Mercury 2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Terphenyls 3. Lead 4. Oxides of Nitrogen 5. Nitrates, Nitrites, and N-Nitroso Compounds 6. Principles and Methods for Evaluating the Toxicity of Chemicals, Part 1 7. Photochemical Oxidants 8. Sulfur Oxides and Suspended Particulate Matter 9. DDT and its Derivatives 10. Carbon Disulfide 11. Mycotoxins 12. Noise 13. Carbon Monoxide 14. Ultraviolet Radiation 15. Tin and Organotin Compounds 16. Radiofrequency and Microwaves 17. Manganese 18. Arsenic 19. Hydrogen Sulfide 20. Selected Petroleum Products 21. Chlorine and Hydrogen Chloride 22. Ultrasound 23. Lasers and Optical Radiation 24. Titanium 25. Selected Radionuclides 26. Styrene 27. Guidelines on Studies in Environmental Epidemiology 28. Acrylonitrile 29. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) 30. Principles for Evaluating Health Risks to Progeny Associated with Exposure to Chemicals during Pregnancy 31. Tetrachloroethylene 32. Methylene Chloride 33. Epichlorohydrin 34. Chlordane 35. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Fields 36. Fluorine and Fluorides 37. Aquatic (Marine and Freshwater) Biotoxins 38. Heptachlor 39. Paraquat and Diquat 40. Endosulfan 41. Quintozene 42. Tecnazene 43. Chlordecone 44. Mirex continued on p. 156
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure of Phlebotomus Argentipes to Alpha-Cypermethrin, Permethrin, and DDT Using CDC Bottle Bioassays to Assess Insecticide Susceptibility
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Undergraduate Honors Capstone Projects Honors Program 5-2020 Exposure of Phlebotomus Argentipes to Alpha-Cypermethrin, Permethrin, and DDT Using CDC Bottle Bioassays to Assess Insecticide Susceptibility Jacob Rex Andersen Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/honors Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Andersen, Jacob Rex, "Exposure of Phlebotomus Argentipes to Alpha-Cypermethrin, Permethrin, and DDT Using CDC Bottle Bioassays to Assess Insecticide Susceptibility" (2020). Undergraduate Honors Capstone Projects. 485. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/honors/485 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © 2020 Jacob Rex Andersen All Rights Reserved i Abstract Background: Insecticide resistance for sand flies is a concern since sand flies are vectors for Leishmania spp. parasites which cause leishmaniasis affecting millions of people each year. The CDC bottle bioassay is used to assess resistance by comparing known insecticide diagnostic doses and diagnostic times from an insecticide-susceptible population. The objective of this study was to determine diagnostic doses and diagnostic times for α-cypermethrin and the lethal dose for 50% and 90% mortality for α- cypermethrin, permethrin, and DDT for Phlebotomus argentipes. Methods: The CDC bottle bioassays were performed in 1,000 mL glass bottles with 15- 25 sand flies from a laboratory strain of insecticide-susceptible P. argentipes. A range of concentrations of α-cypermethrin, permethrin, and DDT were evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Page 1 of 6
    Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Page 1 of 6 Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Fact Sheet No. 31 Revised May 2000 Dr. Jay B Karren, Extension Entomologist Alan H. Roe, Insect Diagnostician Introduction Carpenter ants are members of the insect order Hymenoptera, which includes bees, wasps, sawflies, and other ants. Carpenter ants can be occasional pests in the home and are noted particularly for the damage they can cause when nesting in wood. In Utah they are more of a nuisance rather than a major structural pest. Carpenter ants, along with a number of other ant species, utilize cavities in wood, particularly stumps and logs in decayed condition, as nesting sites. They are most abundant in forests and can be easily found under loose bark of dead trees, stumps, or fallen logs. Homeowners may bring them into their homes when they transport infested logs from forests to use as firewood. Description Carpenter ants include species that are among the largest ants found in the United States. They are social insects with a complex and well-defined caste system. The worker ants are sterile females and may occur in different sizes (majors and minors). Members of the reproductive caste (fertile males and females) are usually winged prior to mating. All ants develop from eggs deposited by a fertilized female (queen). The eggs hatch into grub-like larvae (immatures) which are fed and cared for by the workers. When fully grown, the larvae spin a cocoon and enter the pupal stage. The pupal stage is a period of transformation from the larva to adult.
    [Show full text]
  • "U/^ ((*.U \ BIBLIOTHEEK STARINGGEBOUW Volatilization of Tri-Allate, Ethoprophos and Parathion Measured with Four Methods After Spraying on a Sandy Soil
    "u/^ ((*.u \ BIBLIOTHEEK STARINGGEBOUW Volatilization of tri-allate, ethoprophos and parathion measured with four methods after spraying on a sandy soil G. Bor F. van den Berg J.H. Smelt R.A. Smidt A.E. van de Peppel-Groen M. Leistra Report 104 DLO Winand Staring Centre, Wageningen (The Netherlands), 1995 1 h FEB. 1998 0000' ABSTRACT Bor, G., F. van den Berg, J.H. Smelt, R.A. Smidt, A.E. van de Peppel-Groen, M. Leistra, 1995. Volatilization of tri-allate, ethoprophos and parathion measured withfour methods after spraying on a sandy soil. Wageningen (The Netherlands), DLO Winand Staring Centre. Report 104. 62 pp.; 9 Figs; 6 Tables; 14 Refs; 3 Annex. At about eleven times after application of tri-allate, ethoprophos and parathion to a sandy soil, their rates of volatilization were determined with the aerodynamic method (AD),th e Bowen-ratio method (BR), the theoretical-profile method (TP) and the Box method (B). The volatilization was highest for tri-allate and lowest for parathion. On the first day after application, the volatilization rate decreased sharply,bu tthereafte r the decreasewa smor egradual .Th edifference s involatilizatio n rate asdetermine d withth eAD ,B R andT Pmethod s werecomparativel y small.Th erate sdetermine d with the Box method were mostly lower than those determined with the other methods. Keywords: aerodynamic method, air quality, air sampling, Bowen ratio method, Box method, field experiment, gas chromatography, pesticide, polystyrene, theoretical-profile method, XAD ISSN 0927-4537 ©1995 DLO Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil and Water Research (SC-DLO) P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 488 Subpart A—Organic Pesticide Chemicals Manufacturing
    § 455.11 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) chemical products and be considered a this subpart are applicable to dis- ‘‘stand-alone’’ PFPR facility. charges resulting from the manufac- ture of the following organic active in- [43 FR 17776, Apr. 25, 1978, as amended at 50 FR 40701, Oct. 4, 1985; 51 FR 44911, Dec. 15, gredients: Aldrin, BHC, Captan, 1986; 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28, 1993; 61 FR 57548, Chlordane, DDD, DDE, DDT, Dichloran, Nov. 6, 1996] Dieldrin, Endosulfan, Endrin, Hepta- chlor, Lindane, Methoxychlor, Mirex, Subpart A—Organic Pesticide PCNB, Toxaphene, Trifluralin, Chemicals Manufacturing Azinphos Methyl, Demeton-O, Demeton-S, Diazinon, Disulfoton, Mal- Subcategory athion, Parathion Methyl, Parathion Ethyl, Aminocarb, Carbaryl, SOURCE: 43 FR 44846, Sept. 29, 1978, unless Methiocarb, Mexacarbate, Propoxur, otherwise noted. Barban, Chlorpropham, Diuron, Fenuron, Fenuron-TCA, Linuron, § 455.11 Compliance date for pretreatment standards for existing Monuron, Monuron-TCA, Neubron, sources (PSES). Propham, Swep, 2,4-D, Dicamba, Silvex, 2,4,5-T, Siduron, Perthane, and All discharges subject to Dicofol. pretreatment standards for existing (c) The intermediates used to manu- sources (PSES) in subparts A and B of facture the active ingredients and ac- this part must comply with the stand- tive ingredients used solely in experi- ards no later than September 28, 1993. mental pesticides are excluded from [61 FR 57549, Nov. 6, 1996] coverage in this subpart. Insecticidal pathogenic organisms such as Bacillus § 455.20 Applicability; description of thuringiensis, insect growth hormones, the organic pesticide chemicals plant extracts such as pyrethrins; sex manufacturing subcategory. attractants and botanicals such as Ro- (a) For the purpose of calculating and tenone are also excluded from BPT applying effluent limitations for COD, coverage in this subpart.
    [Show full text]
  • COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances
    COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances revised 2/4/2021 IARC list 1 are Carcinogenic to humans list compiled by Hector Acuna, UCSB IARC list Group 2A Probably carcinogenic to humans IARC list Group 2B Possibly carcinogenic to humans If any of the chemicals listed below are used in your research then complete a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the product as described in the Chemical Hygiene Plan. Prop 65 known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity Material(s) not on the list does not preclude one from completing an SOP. Other extremely toxic chemicals KNOWN Carcinogens from National Toxicology Program (NTP) or other high hazards will require the development of an SOP. Red= added in 2020 or status change Reasonably Anticipated NTP EPA Haz list COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances CAS Source from where the material is listed. 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide Acutely Toxic Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- Acutely Toxic 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea (Methyl-CCNU) Prop 65 KNOWN Carcinogens NTP 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) IARC list Group 2A Reasonably Anticipated NTP 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) (Lomustine) Prop 65 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea Acutely Toxic 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane IARC list Group 2B 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Prop 65 IARC list Group 2B 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p -chloropheny)ethylene (DDE) Prop 65 1,1-Dichloroethane
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Properties of Chemicals Volume 2
    1 t ENVIRONMENTAL 1 PROTECTION Esa Nikunen . Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 1 O O O O O O O O OO O OOOOOO Ol OIOOO FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE • EDITA Esa Nikunen e Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 HELSINKI 1000 OlO 00000001 00000000000000000 Th/s is a second revfsed version of Environmental Properties of Chemica/s, published by VAPK-Pub/ishing and Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Department as Research Report 91, 1990. The pubiication is also available as a CD ROM version: EnviChem 2.0, a PC database runniny under Windows operating systems. ISBN 951-7-2967-2 (publisher) ISBN 952-7 1-0670-0 (co-publisher) ISSN 1238-8602 Layout: Pikseri Julkaisupalvelut Cover illustration: Jussi Hirvi Edita Ltd. Helsinki 2000 Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 _____ _____________________________________________________ Contents . VOLUME ONE 1 Contents of the report 2 Environmental properties of chemicals 3 Abbreviations and explanations 7 3.1 Ways of exposure 7 3.2 Exposed species 7 3.3 Fffects________________________________ 7 3.4 Length of exposure 7 3.5 Odour thresholds 8 3.6 Toxicity endpoints 9 3.7 Other abbreviations 9 4 Listofexposedspecies 10 4.1 Mammais 10 4.2 Plants 13 4.3 Birds 14 4.4 Insects 17 4.5 Fishes 1$ 4.6 Mollusca 22 4.7 Crustaceans 23 4.8 Algae 24 4.9 Others 25 5 References 27 Index 1 List of chemicals in alphabetical order - 169 Index II List of chemicals in CAS-number order
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water with Direct Aqueous Injection LC/MS/MS
    EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water with Direct Aqueous Injection LC/MS/MS E. Michael Thurman and Imma Ferrer Center for Environmental Mass Spectrometry University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA Confidentiality Label 1 March 20, 2012 Abstract EPA Method 538 is a new method from EPA for organophosphate pesticides in drinking water. It uses direct aqueous injection; thus, no sample preparation is needed. We use both UHPLC (Agilent 1290) and MS/MS (Agilent 6460) analysis for rapid analysis and sensitive detection with ng/L limits of detection. A second MRM is added for more reliable identification. Confidentiality Label 2 March 20, 2012 Hypothesis Direct injection of organophosphate pesticides (EPA Method 538) will work by UHPLC (Agilent Model 1290) and LC/MS/MS with Jetstream (Agilent Model 6460) with trace level detection at ng/L concentrations. Confidentiality Label 3 March 20, 2012 1. Introduction-Summary 1.1 EPA Method 538 (published in November 2009 by Shoemaker) deals with Organophosphate pesticides in drinking water (1) and one other contaminant, quinoline. 1.2 The method consists of 10 compounds: acephate, aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, dicrotophos, diisopropylmethylphosphonate (DIMP), fenamiphos sulfone, fenamiphos sulfoxide, methamidophos, oxydemeton methyl, quinoline, and thiofanox with 5 labeled internal standards. 1.3 Direct aqueous injection is used with a large volume sample of 100 microliters; thus, no sample preparation is needed. 1.4 Because solid phase extraction (i.e. concentration of the sample is not carried out) suppression is mimimized in the analysis. 1.5 Part-per-Trillion Detection Limits. Confidentiality Label 4 March 20, 2012 Introduction 1.1: EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water by Direct Aqueous Injection by Jody Shoemaker, EPA Cincinnati, OH [email protected] 513-569-7298 Confidentiality Label 5 March 20, 2012 Introduction: 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water by Aqueous Direct Injection and LC/MS/MS Summar
    EPA Method 538: Determination of Selected Organic Contaminants in Drinking Water by Aqueous Direct Injection and LC/MS/MS UCT Part Numbers: SLAQ100ID21-3UM - Selectra® Aqueous C18, 100 x 2.1mm, 3µm SLAQGDC20-3UM - Selectra® Aqueous C18, Guard column, 10 x 2.0mm, 3µm SLGRDHLDR - Guard Cartridge Holder June 2015 Summary: This application outlines a direct aqueous injection-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (DAI-LC/MS/MS) method for the determination of 11 selected organic contaminants in drinking water, including methamidophos, acephate, aldicarb sulfoxide, oxydemeton methyl, dicrotophos, aldicarb, diisopropyl methylphosphonate (DIMP), fenamiphos sulfone, fenamiphos sulfoxide, thiofanox, and quinoline [1]. Dicrotophos, oxydemeton methyl, methamidophos, and acephate are UCMR4 compounds. An Aqueous C18 HPLC column was utilized for analyte retention and separation. Calibration curves were constructed using calibration standards prepared in reagent water with preservative reagents for analyte quantitation. The responses were linear over the entire analytical ranges (R2 ≥ 0.9970). Excellent accuracy (90 - 111%) and precision (RSD% < 20%, n=7) were achieved for fortified reagent water and tap water samples. Procedure: 1. Preserve drinking water sample with 64 mg/L of sodium omadine (antimicrobial) and 1.5 g/L of ammonium acetate (binding free chlorine). 2. Mix 0.99 mL of the preserved water sample with 10 μL of 0.4-12.5 ng/μL internal standard mixture, and vortex for 30 sec. 3. Inject 50 μL onto LC/MS/MS equipped with an aqueous
    [Show full text]
  • Phytotoxicity of Some Organophosphate Insecticides to Oughly with Air Dry, Sieved Soil, to Pro­ Duce Rates of 37.5, 75 and ISO Mg Aj
    Plant Protection Quarterly VoI.7(1} 1992 23 -------------------------------- ties of each pesticide were shaken thor­ Phytotoxicity of some organophosphate insecticides to oughly with air dry, sieved soil, to pro­ duce rates of 37.5, 75 and ISO mg aj. L-' onions and carrots during germination and emergence soil. Each pot constituted one plot. If it is assumed that in a field situation, P.J. Sinclair, New South Wales Agriculture, Horticultural Research and band-in-furrow treatment would treat a Advisory Station, Griffith, New South Wales 2680, Australia. strip 50 mm wide by 20 mm deep, the rates tested would correspond to 37.5, 75 R.J. Neeson and P.A. Williams, New South Wales Agriculture, Agricultural and 150 mg a.i. m" row, or 0.5,1.0 and 2.0 institute, Yanco, New South Wales 2703, Australia. kg a.i. ha" at a row spacing of 75 cm. The low and medium rates are then compara­ Summary ble to ra tes used in the field by Getzin The phytotoxicity of some commonly phytotoxicity from carbofuran applied to (1973), Thompson et al. (1981) and used insecticides to onions (Allium cepa) onions as a seed dressing. Chlorpyrifos is Goodyer et al. (1989) . and carrots (Daucus carota) during es­ generally non-phytotoxic at recom­ Daily counts of emerged seedlings were tablishment was assessed in pot trials. mended rates and methods of application, made at 7 to 18 days and at 21 days after Terbufos, ethoprophos, phoxirn and but some crops are especially sensitive to first watering. These data were used to de­ carbofuran (all 10% a.L granular fonnu­ it during the seedling stage or if the termine the total number of seedlings lations) and chlorpyrifos (25% a.i.
    [Show full text]