Belarus Green Cities MTR Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Belarus Green Cities MTR Report Mid-Term Review – Belarus Green Cities Official Project Title: Belarus: Supporting Green Urban Development in Small and Medium-Sized Cities in Belarus Country: Belarus UNDP PIMS# 5372 GEF Project ID# 4981 GEF Operational Focal Area: CCM (Climate Change Mitigation) GEF Strategic Programs: CCM-4 (Promote energy efficient, low carbon transport and urban systems) and CCM-2 (Promote market transformation for energy efficiency in industry and the building sector) Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection United Nations Development Programme Global Environment Facility April 26, 2019 Mid-Term Review Timeline Mission: February 11 – 23, 2019: Minsk, Novopolotsk, Polotsk, Novogrudok, Brest, and Baranovichy, Belarus Main Work: January 6 – March 17, 2019 (from start of document review to draft report) Report Reviews and Finalization: March 18, 2019 – April 26, 2019 Prepared by: Eugenia Katsigris, Managing Director, Parnon Group Victoryia Kalosha, Partner, Imacon Belarus Green Cities Mid-Term Review Contents Project Information Table ii Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions iii Acknowledgements vi Executive Summary vii 1. Project Background 1 2. Midterm Review Approach 3 3. Project Overall 5 4. Outcome 1. Green Urban Development Plans 11 5. Outcome 2. SUT Pilots and ISUMP 16 6. Outcome 3. Municipal Energy Efficiency Pilots 22 7. Outcome 4. Replication of Green urban Development 25 8. Implementation 27 9. Design and Indicators 31 10. Expenditures 31 11. Sustainability 34 12. Recommendations 34 Annex 1. Mid-Term Review Mission and Other Consultations – Realized Schedule 43 Annex 2. Documents Reviewed 46 Annex 3. Preliminary Suggestions for Output and Activity Revisions 49 Annex 4. Proposed Indicator Revisions 55 Annex 5. Progress towards Indicator Targets 59 Annex 6. Explanation of Project Ratings Given and Rating Scales 64 Annex 7. Recommendations Table 68 Annex 8. Master Interview Topic and Question List 71 Annex 9. UNEG Code of Conduct for Evaluators/ Reviewers 77 Annex 10. TOR for MTR Consultants 78 Annex 11. Reviewer Comments and MTR Team Responses (provided as separate file per UNDP guidelines) Annex 12. Action Plan for Key Recommendations 89 Annex 13. Expenditure Analysis Tables 102 Annex 14. GEF Climate Change Mitigation Tracking Tool at Mid-Term of Project (provided as separate Excel file) i Belarus Green Cities Mid-Term Review Project Information Table Project Title Belarus: Supporting Green Urban Development in Small and Medium-Sized Cities in Belarus (Belarus Green Cities) UNDP Project ID (PIMS#) 5372 PIF Approval Date: June 20, 2013 GEF Project ID (PMIS#) 4981 CEO Endorsement June 18, 2015 Date: Atlas Business Unit Award #: 00081828 ProDoc Signature October 30, 2015 Project ID: 00090983 Date (date project began): Country: Belarus Date project manager late 2016 (1st PM) hired: May 2017 (2nd PM) Region: Europe & CIS Inception Workshop July 6, 2017 date: Focal Area: CCM (climate Midterm Review March 17, 2019 (draft report) change mitigation) completion date: April 26, 2019 (response to UNDP CO and PMU comments and final report) GEF Focal Area Strategic CCM-4: Promote Planned project March 1, 2021 Objectives: energy efficient, low closing date: carbon transport and urban systems; CCM- 2: Promote market transformation for energy efficiency in industry and the building sector Trust Fund: GEF TF If revised, proposed NA (leaving option open for op. closing date: extension to Sept. 1, 2022) Executing Agency/ Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection (MNREP) Implementing Partner: Other Execution Partners: Municipalities of Polotsk, Novopolotsk and Novogrudok Project Financing (USD) at CEO Endorsement (USD) - expected at Midterm Review (USD) – realized as of 12/31/2018 [1] GEF Financing: 3,091,000 907,398 [2] UNDP Contribution: 3,000,000 NA [3] Government: 8,945,000 6,312,318 + NA portion [4] Other Partners: 490,420 55,519 + NA portions [5] Total Co-financing 12,435,420 6,367,837 + NA portions [2+3+4]: TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 15,526,420 7,275,235 [1+5] ii Belarus Green Cities Mid-Term Review Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Other Definitions adaptive traffic lights: Smart traffic lights that can adjust based on changing traffic patterns. Baranovichy: City in Brest Oblast of Southwest Belarus with population of 170,000. Baranovichy is one of five “replication cities” selected by the project for preparation of a SECAP. BDB – Belarus Development Bank BelNIIP: State institution under MoAC responsible for preparing master plans for all 311-312 small and medium cities in Belarus, which include all Belarusian cities except for Minsk. Bike lane: In this report, refers to a lane for bikes that is part of a larger street accommodating motorized transport. In Belarusian cities, the lane may also be protected by bumps placed on the road. Bike trail: in this report, refers to a specially made path, which may be paved and which only accommodates bikes and, possibly, pedestrians. BNTU – Belarusian National Technical University. Experts from BNTU in both urban planning and transport have provided services to the project. Brest: City in Brest Oblast of Southwest Belarus, neighboring Poland. Brest’s population is 320,000. The city has prepared a symbio city plan with support of the project. BTU – Belarus Transport Union. One of the first NGOs in Belarus. Cooperates with many former government experts. BTU is preparing the ISUMP for the project. Bus lane: A special lane painted typically on the far right lane of the road that only allows buses and prohibits cars, except for right turns. Bus lanes are a key component of bus rapid transit (BRT), in which conditions are optimized to speed up public transit and make it more attractive. CDR – combined delivery report: UNDP document that shows realized and committed project expenditures. CO2 – carbon dioxide. Co-financing: For a GEF project, co-financing is the funding provided by other sources to support the same outcomes and, often, the same outputs and activities as the GEF funds. CER – GEF CEO Endorsement Request. A project design document submitted, along with the project document (“ProDoc”), to the GEF once full project design has been completed. circular intersection: An intersection at which traffic flows around a circular center island instead of stopping at traffic lights. This kind of intersection used under appropriate conditions can reduce vehicle idling times and thus reduce emissions. Also known as “roundabout.” Covenant of Mayors: A European-based movement for local energy and climate actions. Within two years of joining, signatories are required to prepare a SECAP (previously, a SEAP). Department of Energy Efficiency: In Belarus, under State Committee for Standardization, the government department responsible for energy efficiency. EBRD – European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Ecopartnership – NGO registered in Belarus that has an EU-funded project supporting cities that are signatories of the Covenant of Mayors. The project is helping 13 cities prepare SECAPs and has a related small grants program for civil society organizations and cities. EE – energy efficiency. Informal acronym used in this document. Executive Committee: At the city-level in Belarus, the government organ responsible for most decision- making. It is led by a chair and deputy chairs. GEF – Global Environment Facility. Core funding source of this project. GHG – greenhouse gas GHG DER – direct greenhouse gas emission reduction. In this report, “direct” means directly due to project activities. GHG ER – greenhouse gas emission reduction GPSC – Global Platform for Sustainable Cities. A program funded by the GEF and implemented by the World Bank. The platform partners with 28 cities in 11 countries and works to find solutions for iii Belarus Green Cities Mid-Term Review sustainable urban growth. It has USD 150 million in funding. Though Belarus is not included in its scope of funding, Green Cities has attended a GPSC conference. GorSvet: Smart LED street lighting project in Polotsk, funded by EU. Project has similar timeline to Novogrudok smart LED street lighting project, with installation expected soon, but takes a more comprehensive and costly approach, replacing cables, etc. GUD – green urban development. An approach to municipal development that emphasizes environmental sustainability and integrates sectoral aspects (energy, waste, and transport) with spatial planning. GUDP – green urban development plan. Municipal plan taking a GUD approach and involving cities closely in development of the plan. GU Planning – municipal planning that incorporates GUD/ GUDP approaches. Interaction: NGO with activity in Belarus. Interaction, with EU funding, supported Polotsk in preparing its SUMP and developing its earliest bicycle lanes. Interaction now has an EU-funded project in which it is helping about ten Belarusian cities prepare SECAPs. INV – funds designated for investment in equipment and infrastructure, in contrast with TA funds, which are to be used for services. The distinction between TA and INV is used in budget allocations for GEF projects. IP – Implementing Partner. In a nationally implemented UNDP-supported GEF-financed project, the government agency responsible for implementation. MNREP is the IP of Green Cities. ISUMP – Integrated SUMP. Used in this report to refer to a plan that integrates sustainable urban mobility planning for two cities, in the case of Green Cities, Polotsk and Novopolotsk. SUMPs (for one city each) are much more common than ISUMPs, but because these cities
Recommended publications
  • Eastern Partnership Regional Transport Study
    Eastern Partnership regional transport study TRACECA IDEAJune II 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 1 Transport Dialogue and THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE EU Networks Interoperability II Eastern Partnership regional transport study Final report Annex II – Thematic maps June 2015 This document is prepared by the IDEA II Project. The IDEA II Project is implemented by TRT Trasporti e Territorio in association with: Panteia Group, Dornier Consulting GmbH and Lutsk University Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 ANNEX II – THEMATIC MAPS ................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Rail maps................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Road maps ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Maps for Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova ........................................................................ 6 1.2 Maps for Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ................................................................... 7 Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 3 1 ANNEX II – THEMATIC MAPS In the context of this assignment, a GIS database to display the collected indicators of the EaP transport network has been completed. The GIS database is based on the shapefiles (GIS files) of the EaP road and rail transport networks received
    [Show full text]
  • Contributo Scientifico: Secondo Workshop Internazionale
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS of the 2nd international workshop–conference “RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN HERPETOFAUNA AND ITS ENVIRONMENT: BOMBINA BOMBINA, EMYS ORBICULARIS, AND CORONELLA AUSTRIACA” Belarus Belgium Denmark France Germany Italy Latvia Poland Russia Spain Ukraine www.life-herpetolatvia.biology.lv Daugavpils University, Institute of Ecology 2014 Book of abstracts of the 2nd International workshop–conference: Research and conservation of European herpetofauna and its environment: Bombina bombina, Emys orbicularis, and Coronella austriaca. Project LIFE-HerpetoLatvia, 14-15.08.2014. Daugavpils, Latvia: 42 p. The Project LIFE-HerpetoLatvia is co-financed by European Commission. Natura 2000. 'Natura 2000 - Europe's nature for you. The sites of Project are part of the European Natura 2000 Network. It has been designated because it hosts some of Europe's most threatened species and habitats. All 27 countries of the EU are working together through the Natura 2000 network to safeguard Europe's rich and diverse natural heritage for the benefit of all'. Scientific committee Academ., Dr. Arvids Barsevskis, Daugavpils University, Latvia; Dr. Victor Bakharev, Mozyr Pedagogical University, Belarus; PhD (Biol.) Vladimir Vladimirovich Bobrov, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the RAS, Russia; Dr. Andris Čeirāns, LIFE-HerpetoLatvia, University of Latvia, Latvia; Dr. Jean-Yves Georges, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Department of Ecology, Physiology and Ethology, France; Dr. Dario Ottonello, Cesbin srl, spin-off of Genoa University, Italy; Dr. Aija Pupiņa, LIFE-HerpetoLatvia, Latgales Zoo, Daugavpils University, Latvia; Dr. Artūrs Škute, Daugavpils University, Latvia; Dr. Nataļja Škute, Daugavpils University, Latvia; Dr. Wlodzimierz Wojtas, Instytut Biologii, Cracow Pedagogical University, Poland. Dr. Mihails Pupiņš, LIFE-HerpetoLatvia, Daugavpils University, Latvia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second National Conference on the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy in Belarus
    THE SECOND NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE COVENANT OF MAYORS FOR CLIMATE AND ENERGY IN BELARUS Date: June 28, 2018 Location: Iuje, Grodno Region, Iuje District Executive Committee, Kamsamolskaia square 1. Organizers: IPO “Ecopartnership”; Department on Energy Efficiency under the State Standardization Committee of the Republic of Belarus; Ministry of Nature Resources and Environment protection of the Republic of Belarus; Iuje District Executive Committee. AGENDA OF THE CONFERENCE 7.30 Departure of participants from Minsk to Iuje by organized transport 10.00-10.30 Registration of conference participants. Coffee break 10.30-11.00 Opening. Welcome speeches: - Vladimir Kuzmich, deputy head of the Iuje District Executive Committee - Tatyana Kononchuk, Chair of the Standing Commission of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus on Environment, Natural Resources Management and Chernobyl Disaster - Vladimir Sevchenok, Deputy Head of the Department of Scientific and Technical Policy and Foreign Economic Relations of the Department on Energy Efficiency under the State Standardization Committee of the Republic of Belarus - Andrei Pilipchuk, Deputy Head of the Directorate for Regulation of the Impacts on the Atmospheric Air, Climate Change and Expertise of the Ministry of Nature Resources and Environment Protection of the Republic of Belarus - Elena Rakova, Coordinator of EU projects in the Environment Protection and Energy Sectors, EU Delegation to Belarus - Yulia Yablonskaya, Chair of the International Public
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes”
    THIRD STEP OF EUROREGION “COUNTRY OF LAKES” Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” Project „Third STEP for the strategy of Euroregion “Country of lakes” – planning future together for sustainable social and economic development of Latvian-Lithuanian- Belarussian border territories/3rd STEP” "3-rd step” 2014 Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” This action is funded by the European Union, by Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus Cross-border Cooperation Programme within the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument. The Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus Cross-border Cooperation Programme within the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument succeeds the Baltic Sea Region INTERREG IIIB Neighbourhood Programme Priority South IIIA Programme for the period of 2007-2013. The overall strategic goal of the programme is to enhance the cohesion of the Latvian, Lithuanian and Belarusian border region, to secure a high level of environmental protection and to provide for economic and social welfare as well as to promote intercultural dialogue and cultural diversity. Latgale region in Latvia, Panevėžys, Utena, Vilnius, Alytus and Kaunas counties in Lithuania, as well as Vitebsk, Mogilev, Minsk and Grodno oblasts take part in the Programme. The Joint Managing Authority of the programme is the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Lithuania. The web site of the programme is www.enpi-cbc.eu. The European Union is made up of 28 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, during a period of enlargement of 50 years, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Structure of Road Transportation and Logistics Infrastructure in the Republic of Belarus
    ISSN 1426-5915 e-ISSN 2543-859X 20(2)/2017 Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG 2017, 20(2), 8-18 DOI 10.4467/2543859XPKG.17.007.7389 GeoGraPhic sTrucTure of road TransPorTaTion and loGisTics infrasTrucTure in The rePublic of belarus Struktura geograficzna infrastruktury transportu drogowego i logistyki w Republice Białorusi andrei bezruchonak Department of Economic Geography of Foreign Countries, Faculty of Geography, Belarusian State University, Leningradskaya st. 16, 220030, Minsk, Belarus e-mail: [email protected] citation: Bezruchonak A., 2017, Geographic structure of road transportation and logistics infrastructure in the Republic of Belarus, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 20(2), 8-18. abstract: Transportation, representing 6% of GDP, plays vital role in social and economic development of the Republic of Belarus. The purpose of this article is to present the geographic analysis of current spatial structure of the road transportation in Belarus in 2000-2014. The choice of transport mode for the article was influenced by several factors, such as historic devel- opment, network coverage, transformational changes in productivity, rapid increase in car ownership numbers, emergence of logistic centers and intelligent transportation systems. The article reviews the range of topics, including morphology of the major roads network, logistic centers spatial distribution and regional features of passenger and cargo productivity, discusses current transformational changes within the road transportation sector in Belarus. The key findings indicate that current changes in spatial structure of the road transportation in Belarus have uneven nature, shaped by social, economic, political and geopolitical external and internal factors and are a subject of interest for both transportation researchers and practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Project. Article V: 5.01
    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: PAD3125 Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF EURO 90 MILLION (US$101 MILLION EQUIVALENT) Public Disclosure Authorized TO THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS FOR A UTILITY EFFICIENCY AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT May 23, 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Water Global Practice Europe and Central Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective April 30, 2019) Currency Unit = Belarusian Ruble (BYN) BYN 2.1089= US$1 BYN 2.3528= Euro 1 US$ 1.1212 = Euro 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 Regional Vice President: Cyril Muller Country Director: Satu Kähkönen Senior Global Practice Director: Jennifer Sara Practice Manager: David Michaud Task Team Leader(s): Stjepan Gabric, Sanyu Lutalo, Silpa Kaza ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AF Additional Financing APA Alternate Procurement Arrangements BOD Biological Oxygen Demand CERC Contingent Emergency Response Component CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CO2 Carbon dioxide CPF Country Partnership Framework DLI Disbursement Linked Indicator EA Environmental Assessment ECA Europe and Central Asia EHS Environmental, Health, and Safety EIB European Investment Bank ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and
    [Show full text]
  • Гродненщина Гостеприимная the Hospitable Grodno Region
    Гродненщина гостеприимная The Hospitable Grodno Region МИНСК ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО «ЧЕТЫРЕ ЧЕТВЕРТИ» 2018 УДК 908(476.6)(084.12) ББК 26.89(4Беи)я.6 Г86 Авторы текста: Е.В. Веселуха, Т.Г. Кузнеченкова, Ж.В. Байгот, С.В. Донских, И.И. Бычек, И.И. Аникевич, Т.А. Василёвкина, Е.А. Мотевич, А.Г. Бибикова, Ж.А. Янчевская. Редакционный совет: В.В. Кравцов, В.А. Лискович (председатель редакционного совета), А.Л. Версоцкий, Л.Ч. Новицкая, Е.В. Климович, И.Ф. Китурко, О.Е. Андрейчик, Е.М. Стасюкевич, Т.А. Лидяева. За помощь в подготовке материалов фотоальбома ОУИРП «Рэдакцыя газеты «Гродзенская праўда» благодарит: Гродненский областной и городской исполнительные комитеты, районные исполнительные комитеты. Альбом издан при поддержке Гродненского областного исполнительного комитета. Гродненщина гостеприимная = The Hospitable Grodno Region / Г86 ¶¸ÈÄÆÑ È»ÀÇȶ »Ç»ÁÉ˶ <¾ ºÆ> q ¢¾ÃÇÀ ­»ÈÑÆ» ÍеÈверти – 424 с. : ил. ISBN 978-985-581-192-4. Перед вами альбом, в котором собраны рецепты лучших путешествий по Гродненской области. В поиске новых впечатлений, интересного и приятного отдыха предлагаем читателям отправиться в виртуальное путешествие в разные уголки нашей области. В каждом районе есть много удивительного и необычного, достойного внимания и открывающего новые грани Гродненщины. Взяв в руки альбом, вы отправитесь в увлекательное путешествие по области, посетив места, которые представляют интерес для самых разных туристов. Для этого не нужно брать отпуск, копить на поездку и упаковывать вещи. Достаточно подарить себе выходные, собраться в короткое путешествие
    [Show full text]
  • Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No. 208 of April 16, 2002 [Amended As of April 30, 2015]
    Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No. 208 of April 16, 2002 [Amended as of April 30, 2015] On Establishment of Free Economic Zone “Grodnoinvest” With a view of attracting domestic and foreign investments to promote further development of export-oriented industries based on the novel and high technologies, to provide favorable conditions for restructuring of the national economy and efficient utilization of the available production facilities, I hereby decree to: 1. To create the free economic zone “Grodnoinvest” of the total area of 3079.17 ha within the boundaries determined by the Grodno Regional Executive Committee according to the Annex for the period of 30 years. 2. To establish that: 2.1. the free economic zone “Grodnoinvest” (hereinafter -- the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”) is a complex zone; 2.2. financing of the development of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”, including industrial, engineering, transport and other infrastructure along with the maintenance of the administrations of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and other expenses stipulated by the legislations for ensuring functioning of the zone, is carried out at the account of the means of the republic budget and the development fund of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”. The development fund of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” is formed at the account of rent payments for land plots located within the boundaries of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and of the Special tourist and recreational park “Avgustovki canal” and provided into lease to its residents, rent payments for the property being in the operative administration of the administrations of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”, as well as at the account of revenues in accordance with the contracts on activity conditions in the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and the Special tourist and recreational park “Avgustovki canal”.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Belarus Factor” from Balancing to Bridging Geopolitical Dividing Lines in Europe?
    The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Clingendael Report Tony van der Togt The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Tony van der Togt Clingendael Report January 2017 January 2017 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine after signing the Minsk II agreement, February 2015. © In Terris Online Newspaper Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the author Tony van der Togt is Senior Research Fellow at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ in The Hague.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Belarus – a Significant Chess Piece on the Chessboard of Regional Security
    Journal on Baltic Security , 2018; 4(1): 39–54 Editorial Open Access Piotr Piss* ‘Belarus – a significant chess piece on the chessboard of regional security DOI 10.2478/jobs-2018-0004 received February 5, 2018; accepted February 20, 2018. Abstract: Belarus is often considered as ‘the last authoritarian state in Europe’ or the ‘last Soviet Republic’. Belarusian policies are not a popular research topic. Over the past years, the country has made headlines mostly as a regime violating human rights. Since the Russian aggression on Ukraine, Belarus has been getting renewed attention. Minsk was the scene of a series of talks that aim at stopping the ongoing war in Ukraine. Western media, scholars and society got a reminder that Eastern Europe was not a conflict-free zone. This article puts military security policy of Belarus into perspective by showing that Belarus ‘per se’ is not a threat for neighboring countries; Belarus dependency towards Russia is huge; thus, Minsk has a small capability to run its own independent security policy; military potential of Belarus is significant in the region, but gap in equipment and training between NATO and Belarus is really more; it is in the interest of Western countries to keep the Lukashenko’s regime in Belarus. Keywords: Belarus; conflict; defence; security; NATO; Russia. Belarus is often considered as ‘the last authoritarian state in Europe’ or the ‘last Soviet Republic’. Belarusian policies are not a popular research topic. Over the past years, the country has made headlines mostly as a regime violating human rights. Since the Russian aggression on Ukraine, Belarus has been getting renewed attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Amateur Radio Award's Directory
    AAMMAATTEEUURR RRAADDIIOO AAWWAARRDD’’’SS DDIIRREECCTTOORRYY BELARUS COPYED BY : YB1PR – FAISAL Page 1 . BELARUS BELARUSSIAN FEDERATION OF RADIOAMATEURS SERIES General Requirements: GCR accepted. All bands and modes. Only EU/EW prefixes. SWL OK. GCR list. Fees are shown with each award. Contacts since 1-1-94 All bands and modes. Apply to: Mrs. Valentina A. Sidorova EU1AAA, PO Box 469, Minsk 220050, Republic of Belarus. Worked All Republic of Belarus Award Contact stations in Republic of Belarus since 1 Jan 1994. Belarus stations need 50, EU need 25 different, all others 15. These must include contacts from the following areas of Belarus: Region Prefix Belarus EU Needs DX Needs Minsk-city EU/EW1 10 4 2 Minsk region EU/EW2 3 2 1 Brest region EU/EW3 3 2 1 Grodno region EU/EW4 3 2 1 Vitebsk region EU/EW6 3 2 1 Mogilev region EU/EW7 3 2 1 Gomel region EU/EW8 3 2 1 Total QSOs needed: (minimum number of QSOs per 50 25 15 region are shown in the column) Cost of award in $US: $US1.50 $US2.00 $US5.00 Cost in IRC: 3 IRC 5 IRC 10 IRC Worked 28 Meridian Award (W-28-M) Contact stations located along the 28th meridian. SWL OK. Basic award granted for 15 countries confirmed. An Honor endorsement granted when all 20 countries are contacted. Valid countries are: LA OH ES UA1 YL EU UR ER YO LZ TA SV5-Rhodes SU ST 9Q 9J Z2 A2 7P ZS Contacts on or after 1-1-55. Cost of award for EU stations is $US1.50 or 3 IRCs, CIS countries $US2 or 5 IRCs and all others $US5 or 10 IRCs.
    [Show full text]