Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” THIRD STEP OF EUROREGION “COUNTRY OF LAKES” Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” Project „Third STEP for the strategy of Euroregion “Country of lakes” – planning future together for sustainable social and economic development of Latvian-Lithuanian- Belarussian border territories/3rd STEP” "3-rd step” 2014 Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” This action is funded by the European Union, by Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus Cross-border Cooperation Programme within the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument. The Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus Cross-border Cooperation Programme within the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument succeeds the Baltic Sea Region INTERREG IIIB Neighbourhood Programme Priority South IIIA Programme for the period of 2007-2013. The overall strategic goal of the programme is to enhance the cohesion of the Latvian, Lithuanian and Belarusian border region, to secure a high level of environmental protection and to provide for economic and social welfare as well as to promote intercultural dialogue and cultural diversity. Latgale region in Latvia, Panevėžys, Utena, Vilnius, Alytus and Kaunas counties in Lithuania, as well as Vitebsk, Mogilev, Minsk and Grodno oblasts take part in the Programme. The Joint Managing Authority of the programme is the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Lithuania. The web site of the programme is www.enpi-cbc.eu. The European Union is made up of 28 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, during a period of enlargement of 50 years, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Association Euroregion “Country of Lakes” and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. 2 Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” Content 1. THE PORTRAIT OF EUROREGION “COUNTRY OF LAKES” ............................................ 8 1.1. History ................................................................................................ 9 1.2. Association “Euroregion “Country of Lakes””........................................ 10 1.3. Basic facts about territory of Euroregion “Country of Lakes” ................... 11 1.4. SWOT analysis .................................................................................... 17 1.4.1. Strength .....................................................................................................17 1.4.2. Weaknesses .............................................................................................. 18 1.4.3. Opportunities ............................................................................................ 18 1.4.4. Threats ...................................................................................................... 18 1.5. Political and Strategic Documents ....................................................... 19 1.5.1. European level documents ........................................................................ 19 1.5.2. Documents of national level ...................................................................... 19 1.5.3. Previous strategies of Euroregion .............................................................. 20 1.5.4. Strategies of other Euroregions ................................................................ 20 1.6. Financial sources in 2007-2013 .............................................................. 22 1.7. Projects realized by Euroregion “Country of Lakes” ................................ 22 1.7.1. Projects from 2001 to 2008 ........................................................................ 23 1.7.2. Projects from 2008 to 2013 ........................................................................ 23 2. STRATEGIC PART .................................................................................................... 41 2.1. Why such a strategy (justification) ....................................................... 41 2.1.1. Global Context of planning ........................................................................ 41 2.1.2. The space Cross-border cooperation between the regions - a place for innovation (theory) ........................................................................................................................... 42 2.1.3. Method "Country of Lakes " ....................................................................... 44 2.2. Vision for 2020.................................................................................... 46 2.3. “Economic” profile of Euroregion “Country of Lakes” (Role of cooperation partners) .....................................................................................50 2.4. Strategic goals .................................................................................... 52 2.5. Priorities ............................................................................................ 54 3. PART OF ACTION .................................................................................................... 56 3.1. List of strategic projects for 2014-2020 ................................................. 56 3.2. Strategic projects ............................................................................... 61 P1 Multifunctional, sustainable transport ........................................................... 61 P2 Bike mobility project ...................................................................................... 62 P3 Application for mobile phone "Baltic Country of Lakes" ................................. 63 P4 GadgetGet ..................................................................................................... 65 P5 „Green corridor” ............................................................................................ 66 P6 Project of markets ......................................................................................... 68 P7 Spare time project ......................................................................................... 70 3 Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” P8 Water project ................................................................................................. 72 P9 Project of city parks ....................................................................................... 73 P10 The project of camping ................................................................................ 75 P11 Olympics of Euroregion ................................................................................ 76 P12 Cool Tour ...................................................................................................... 77 P13 Guild of social workers ................................................................................. 78 P14 Social enterprise .......................................................................................... 80 P15 Seniors’ project ............................................................................................ 82 P16 Success ambassadors .................................................................................. 83 P17 "Tails" ........................................................................................................... 84 P18 Community centres ..................................................................................... 85 P19 Social housing .............................................................................................. 87 P20 Green management II .................................................................................. 89 P21 Green house ................................................................................................. 91 P22 Micro Light .................................................................................................. 94 P23 Energy culture and materials ....................................................................... 95 P24 Heritage of regional building of Euroregion "Country of Lakes" ................... 97 4. SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PART ................................................................................ 99 4.1. Euroregion’s spatial structure in future ................................................ 100 4.2. City network in future ........................................................................ 101 4.3. Future structure of transport and engineering network ......................... 102 4.4. Nature structures of the future ........................................................... 104 ATTACHMENT. AUTHORS OF THE STRATEGY .................................................................... 106 4 Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” Introduction Strategy 2014-2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” has been elaborated within the Project „Third STEP for the strategy of Euroregion “Country of lakes” – planning future together for sustainable social and economic development of Latvian-Lithuanian-Belarussian border territories/3rd STEP” "3-rd step” (LLB-1-083), financed from European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument 2007-2013 Cross Border Cooperation Programme Latvia-Lithuania-Belarus. Strategy has been elaborated bu «Grupa93" Ltd, under contract with the Bureau of Latvia Evroregiona "Lake District" c 1 March 2013 on 31 August 2014. Strategy has been approvad by Euroregion
Recommended publications
  • Acta Linguistica Lithuanica
    Acta Linguistica Lithuanica Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXXI Vilnius 2014 Vyriausioji redaktorė / editor-in-chief Grasilda Blažienė (Lietuvių kalbos institutas) redakcinė koLegija / editoriaL board Pietro Umberto Dini (università di Pisa) Jolanta Gelumbeckaitė (universität frankfurt am Main) Tomáš Hoskovec (Masarykova univerzita) Brian D. Joseph (the state university of ohio) Laima Kalėdienė (Lietuvių kalbos institutas) Николай Казанский (Российская академия наук, Институт лингвистических исследований, Санкт-Петербург) Götz Keydana (universität göttingen) Asta Leskauskaitė (Lietuvių kalbos institutas) Daniel Petit (École normale supérieure, Paris) Pēteris Vanags (Latvijas universitāte, stoсkholms universitet) redakcijos sekretorė / assistant to the editor Dalia Kačinaitė-Vrubliauskienė (Lietuvių kalbos institutas) sudarė / coMPiLed by Grasilda Blažienė (Lietuvių kalbos institutas) ŽurnaLo rengiMą ir Leidybą finansaVo Lietuvos mokslo taryba (sutarties nr. Lit-7-48). issn 1648-4444 © Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Vilnius, 2014 turinys / contents straiPsniai / articLes Michail Tarelka, Sergejus Temčinas Lithuanian incantation in arabic script from a tatar Manuscript....... 11 Lietuviškas užkalbėjimas, užrašytas arabiškais rašmenimis totorių rankraštyje Rolandas Kregždys kristijono donelaičio veikalų skolintinė leksika: polonizmai........... 23 Lexical borrowings in the Works by kristijonas donelaitis: Polonisms Janina Švambarytė-Valužienė Mato slančiausko rankraštinis Žodynelis = Iš enciklopedijos. 1903 ...... 64 The Dictionary = From Encyclopaedia.
    [Show full text]
  • Consortium GNS - NUKEM
    Consortium GNS - NUKEM Subcontractor Lithuanian Energy Institute Environmental Impact Assessment Report Interim Storage of RBMK Spent Nuclear Fuel from Ignalina NPP Units 1 and 2 The organiser of the Proposed State Enterprise Ignalina Nuclear Power Economical Activity: Plant The developer of the EIA Report: Consortium GNS - NUKEM (Germany) Lithuanian Energy Institute, Nuclear Engineering Laboratory 2007 . 1(256) Consortium GNS - NUKEM S/14-658.5.9/EIA-R-04 LEI, Nuclear Engineering Laboratory Revision 4 October 24, 2007 Interim Storage of RBMK Spent Nuclear Fuel from Ignalina NPP Units 1 and 2 EIA Report Table of Revisions Revision Issue date Description 0 30 November 2005 Original version as presented to the Consortium by LEI 1 22 December 2005 Integration of received comments. Version as presented to the organizer of proposed economic activity for review 2, Issue 1 10 August 2006 Integration of received comments. Version as presented to the organizer of proposed economic activity for approval 2, Issue 2 02 October 2006 Integration of received additional comments. Version as presented to the organizer of proposed economic activity for approval 2, Issue 3 16 November 2006 Integration of received additional comments. Version as presented to the organizer of proposed economic activity for approval. Version as presented for the public review and comments. Version as presented for relevant parties review and approval. 3, Issue 1 21 June 2007 Integration of the public review results. Integration of relevant parties’ comments and conclusions. Version as presented for competent authority review and approval. 4 24 October 2007 Integration of comments from technical support organizations and competent authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltic Republics
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1994 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Mikko Viitasalo, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Antti Numminen, General Headquarters Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 6 THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1992 ISBN 951-25-0709-9 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1994: National Defence College All rights reserved Painatuskeskus Oy Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1994 Preface Until the end of the First World War, the Baltic region was understood as a geographical area comprising the coastal strip of the Baltic Sea from the Gulf of Danzig to the Gulf of Finland. In the years between the two World Wars the concept became more political in nature: after Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania obtained their independence in 1918 the region gradually became understood as the geographical entity made up of these three republics. Although the Baltic region is geographically fairly homogeneous, each of the newly restored republics possesses unique geographical and strategic features.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Tourism D
    5 POTTERY WORKSHOP OF VALDIS PAULINS CATERING SERVICES Hello, traveller! Address: Dumu Street 8, Kraslava, Kraslava municipality, Latvia 13 JAUNDOME ENVORONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTRE AND EXHIBITION HALL 21 MUSIC WORKSHOP “BALTHARMONIA” Mob.: +371 29128695 DINING HALL „ DAUGAVA” Address: Novomisli, Ezernieki rural territory, Dagda municipality, Latvia Address: "Bikava 2a", Gaigalava, Gaigalava rural territory, Rezekne municipality, Latvia CAFE “PIE ČERVONKAS PILS” This is a guide-book that will help you to experience an exciting trip along The Green Routes E-mail: [email protected] Address: Rigas Street 28, Kraslava, Mob.: +371 25960309 Phone: +371 28728790, + 371 26593441 Address: Cervonka-1, Vecsaliena rural territory, of the border areas of Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus. Routes leading to specially protected nature Website: http://www.visitkraslava.com/ Kraslavas municipality, Latvia E - mail: [email protected] E - mail: [email protected] Daugavpils municipality, Latvia areas under the state care are called “green” ones. These routes are “green” because providers of GPS: X:697648, Y:199786 / 55° 54' 10.30", 27° 9'42.27" Phone: +371 65622634, Mob.: +371 29112899 Website: www.visitdagda.com Website: http://www.baltharmonia.lv Mob.: +371 29726105 tourism service take care of accessibility of environment for people with disabilities. The workshop is around on the territory of the protected landscape Fax: +371 65622266 GPS: X:723253, Y:227872 / 56° 8' 36.72", 27° 35'88" GPS: X:687623, Y:291964 / 56° 44' 1.98", 27° 4'2.23" GPS: X: 673571, Y: 189832 / 55° 49’ 22.13’’, 26° 46’ 14.74’’ You are welcome at the places, where you will get acquainted with the values of the nature area „Augšdaugava”.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I
    www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    Daugavpils University Institute of Systematic Biology 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN BALTIC REGION” Daugavpils, 22 – 24 April, 2009 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Daugavpils University Academic Press “Saule” Daugavpils 2009 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN BALTIC REGION” , Book of Abstracts, Daugavpils, 22 – 24 April, 2009 INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE: Dr., Prof. Arvīds Barševskis, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia – chairman of the Conference; Dr., Assoc. prof. Inese Kokina, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia – vice-chairman of the Conference Dr., Assoc prof.. Linas Balčiauskas, Institute of Ecology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Dr., Assoc prof. Guntis Brumelis, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. Ivars Druvietis, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. Pēteris Evarts – Bunders, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. Dace Grauda , University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; PhD Stanislaw Huruk, Świętokrzyska Academy & Świętokrzyski National Park, Kielce, Poland; Dr. Muza Kirjušina, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. hab., Prof. Māris Kļaviņš, Faculty of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, full member of Latvian Academy of Science, Rīga, Latvia; PhD Tatjana Krama - Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. Indriķis Krams - Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. habil., Prof. Māris Laiviņš, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. hab., Prof. Sławomir Mazur, Warsaw Agricultural University (SGGW), Warsaw, Poland; Dr., Prof. Algimantas Paulauskas, Vytautas Magnus Kaunas University, Kaunas, Lithuania; Dr. Lyubomir Penev, Pensoft, Bulgaria; Dr. hab., Prof. Isaak Rashal, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. hab., Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Knowledge of Latvian Coleoptera. 8
    80 Contributions to the Knowledge of Latvian Coleoptera. 8 Contributions to the Knowledge of Latvian Coleoptera. 8. 1 DMITRY TELNOV , ANDRIS BUKEJS , JĀNIS GAILIS , MĀRTI ŅŠ KALNI ŅŠ, ALEXANDER NAPOLOV , UĢIS PITER ĀNS , KRISTAPS VILKS 1 – Corresponding author: Stopi ņu novads, D ārza iela 10, LV-2130, Dzidri ņas, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] TELNOV D., BUKEJS A., GAILIS J., KALNI ŅŠ M., NAPOLOV A., PITER ĀNS U., VILKS K., 2010. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF LATVIAN COLEOPTERA. 8. - Latvijas Entomologs , 48: 80-91. Abstract: This paper contains information on 10 new and 144 little known and protected beetle species in Latvia, collected between 1939 and 2009. Key words: Coleoptera, fauna, Latvia, little-known species. Introduction List of Species Current publication is a result of studies Carabidae on Latvian Coleoptera made by Latvian Carabus clathratus clathratus LINNAEUS , 1761 coleopterists in 1939-2009. The aim of the Latgale: Dvietes paliene (flood-lands) PNT, current publication is to improve our knowledge Putnu sala, 22.04.2009 (3) flood-lands of River on fauna and ecology of beetles in the Baltic Dviete, leg. M.Kalni ņš. region, with special accent made on poorly known, rare or protected species. Carabus coriaceus coriaceus LINNAEUS , 1758 Ten new and 144 little known or protected Kurzeme: Dundaga parish, Sl ītere NP, Kolka, species of Coleoptera collected are recorded for 03.07.2009 (1) dry coastal pine forest, observed Latvia. New faunal information on 11 by K.Vilks. particularly protected Coleopteran species is given. Particular species are new to the whole * Dolichus halensis (SCHALLER , 1783) Fennoscandian region or / and Baltic States (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Path Dependency and Landscape Biographies in Latgale, Latvia: a Comparative Analysis
    Europ. Countrys. · 3· 2010 · p. 151-168 DOI: 10.2478/v10091-010-0011-7 European Countryside MENDELU PATH DEPENDENCY AND LANDSCAPE BIOGRAPHIES IN LATGALE, LATVIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Anita Zarina1 Received 30 September 2010; Accepted 15 October 2010 Abstract: This paper focuses on the path dependency of landscapes in Latgale, Latvia from the present perspective at the regional and local scale. During the last centuries Latvia’s landscapes have passed through radical changes, which were driven by political events. Each new political era discarded the ideas of the previous era and subsequently reorganized the land(scape) according to the new views. At the regional level the role of history is significant in analyzing landscapes while at the local level the main force is people, often themselves not knowing the history of the place but putting the existing path dependency into practise or disregarding it. The biographies of two former villages are discussed: one which is nearly deserted but filled with forgotten or neglected cultural heritage values and the other – alive and interwoven with some old (almost forgotten) cultural practises. Path dependency in landscapes is relevant only regarding the attachment of people to a place and the experience on which their further desires are based. Key words: Landscape biographies, landscape change, Latgale, path dependency Rezumējums: Raksta pamatā ir pēctecīguma (path dependence) izpausmes Latgales ainavā reģionālā un lokālā mērogā no šodienas skatupunkta. Pēdējo gadsimtu laikā Latvijā ir notikušas dramatiskas ainavas pārmaiņas, to galvenie rosinātāji – politisko varu maiņas. Katra jaunā politiskā ēra veidoja jaunas ainavas saskaņā ar tās ideoloģiju un idejām. Rakstā tiek diskutēts, ka reģionāla mēroga ainavas studijas ir cieši saistītas ar vēstures izpratni un tās lomu, kamēr lokālā mērogā galvenie ainavas veidotāji ir cilvēki un to darbības, kuri bieži vien pat neapzinās vietas/reģiona vēsturi, bet praktizē vai ignorē daudzas paražas vai telpiskās struktūras pēctecības ainavā.
    [Show full text]
  • Daugailių Seniūnija Laikinai Nutraukti Priemiesčio Maršrutai: Nr
    Daugailių seniūnija Laikinai nutraukti priemiesčio maršrutai: Nr. 27 „Utena – Kubiliai per Daugailius, Gaidžius“; Nr. 43 „Utena – Kubiliai per Daugailius“; Nr. 42 „Utena – Šlepečiai per Spitrėnus, Sirvydžius“. Vykstantys koreguoti priemiesčio maršrutai: Nr. 64 „Utena – Zarasai per Degučius“. PRIEMIESČIO MARŠRUTAS Nr. 64 Utena - Zarasai per Degučius Išvykimo laikas Atstumas km Sustojimo vietos Išvykimo laikas pavadinimas reis.Nr.1 nuo pra- tarp reis.Nr.2 džios punktų 6.40 - - Utenos AS 10.50 6.45 3,5 3,5 Kloviniai 10.45 6.48 5,5 2,0 Droničėnai 10.42 6.51 7,4 1,9 Vaikutėnai 10.39 6.54 9,7 2,3 Jotaučiai 10.36 6.57 11,9 2,2 Radeikiai 10.33 6.59 13,3 1,4 Daržiniai 10.31 7.02 15,2 1,9 Taukeliai 10.28 7.05 16,7 1,5 Bajoriškiai 10.25 7.08 18,8 2,1 Daugailiai 10.22 7.12 23,4 4,6 Jureliškis 10.18 7.15 27,1 3,7 Baibiai 10.15 7.20 30,5 3,4 Galminiai 10.10 7.23 32,2 1,7 Šiukščiai 10.07 7.27 34,5 2,3 Degučiai 10.03 7.31 37,3 2,8 Raistiniškės 9.59 7.33 38,7 1,4 Durpynas 9.57 7.37 41,9 3,2 Šunelė 9.53 7.40 43,8 1,9 Asavitai 9.50 7.43 45,5 1,7 Šiliniškės 9.47 7.46 48,1 2,6 Zarasų miestas 9.44 7.50 51,0 2,9 Zarasų AS 9.40 1 - 2 reisai atliekami trečiadieniais, penktadieniais, šeštadieniais.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet Border Disputes—The Case of Estonia, Latvia, and Russia
    The Long Shadow of History: Post-Soviet Border Disputes— The Case of Estonia, Latvia, and Russia Claes Levinsson ∗ Introduction Ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the question of the precise territo- rial delimitations of the Estonian and Latvian borders with the Russian Federation has been a source of discord between the states, and a permanent point of irritation. The question of these national boundaries became an important issue on the political agenda shortly after Estonia and Latvia regained their independence in 1991. The prin- cipal reason for this laid in the arbitrary transfers of territory and the “correction” of borders that was made by the Soviet government shortly after its reoccupation of the Baltic states. In 1991, both Estonia and Latvia pleaded their cases according to inter- national law, and demanded that the borders from the interwar period should be re- stored.1 During the mid-1990s, both Estonia and Latvia gave up their initial claims, and the substance of an agreement was negotiated between the parties. However, the Rus- sian Federation has ever since postponed the ratification of the agreement, claiming that it would not sign any treaty until other contested issues—such as the alleged dis- crimination against the large Russian-speaking minority in the Baltic states—are re- solved in a satisfactory manner. This means that there does not exist any formal and ratified solution to the question of the boundaries of Estonia and Latvia, and that the border issues between the parties are, at least formally, still unresolved. During the prolonged history of these border disputes, neither the EU nor NATO has actively interfered in the contretemps, and the absence of a ratified treaty did not prevent the accession of Estonia and Latvia to the EU and NATO in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I
    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk
    [Show full text]
  • I Sostantivi Lituani Formati Col Suffisso *-Men
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Florence Research UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI FIRENZE DIPARTIMENTO DI LINGUISTICA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN LINGUISTICA XXIII CICLO SETTORE SCIENTIFICO-DISCIPLINARE L-LIN/01 I SOSTANTIVI LITUANI FORMATI COL SUFFISSO *-MEN Candidato Francesco Paolo Pardini Supervisore Coordinatore Prof. Maria Teresa Gagliano Ademollo Prof. Leonardo M. Savoia Introduzione Generalità Il suffisso indeuropeo *-men- (*-mēn-) / *-mon- (*-mōn-) / *-m- come formante nominale compare in gran parte dell’area indeuropea, e la sua funzione è quella di formazione sia di nomi di azione, che spesso assumono il valore semantico di denominazioni di oggetto, sia, in misura minore, di nomi di agente. Queste formazioni possono essere di genere neutro (nomi di azione e denominazioni di oggetto) o maschile (nomi di azione, denominazioni di oggetto e nomi di agente). Ad esempio, sono neutri il gr. ῥεῦμα e l’a.irl. sruaim ‘corrente’; l’ai. nma, il gr. ὄνομα, l’arm. anun, l’a.sl. imę, il got. namō, il lat. nōmen e l’a.irl. ainm ‘nome’; sono invece maschili il gr. πλεύμων e il lat. pulmō ‘polmone’; l’ai. áśman, il gr. ἄκμων, l’a.sl. kamy e il lit. akmuõ ‘pietra’; il gr. ποιμήν e il lit. piemuõ ‘pastore’.1 Distribuzione Se vogliamo considerare, per sommi capi, la distribuzione di questo suffisso nelle varie aree linguistiche indeuropee, dobbiamo innanzitutto distinguere aree in cui esso è produttivo e aree in cui, invece, la produttività è molto limitata. Tralasciando per il momento l’area baltica, che è quella che ci interessa direttamente, il tipo in *-men è produttivo nelle aree indoiranica, greca, latina e slava: in queste aree la sua funzione si è estesa dall’originaria derivazione deverbale anche alla derivazione denominale.
    [Show full text]