Alpha Flight Group Limited and LSG Lufthansa Service Holding AG

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alpha Flight Group Limited and LSG Lufthansa Service Holding AG Alpha Flight Group Limited and LSG Lufthansa Service Holding AG A report on the proposed joint venture between Alpha Flight Group Limited and LSG Lufthansa Service Holding AG 14 March 2012 Competition Commission 2012 Website: www.competition-commission.org.uk Members of the Competition Commission who conducted this inquiry Malcolm Nicholson (Chairman of the Group) Roger Davis Ian Jones Stephen Oram Chief Executive and Secretary of the Competition Commission David Saunders The Competition Commission has excluded from this published version of the final report information which the Inquiry Group considers should be excluded having regard to the three considerations set out in section 244 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (specified information: considerations relevant to disclosure). The omissions are indicated by []. Some numbers have been replaced by a range. These are shown in square brackets. Non-sensitive wording is also indicated in square brackets. iii Contents Page Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 Findings ................................................................................................................................ 9 1. The reference .................................................................................................................. 9 2. The in-flight catering services industry............................................................................. 9 Costs in the airline industry ............................................................................................. 9 Airlines and their different catering requirements ........................................................... 10 Short- and long-haul catering .................................................................................... 10 Heathrow Airport ....................................................................................................... 11 The Regions ............................................................................................................. 11 Recent trends in in-flight catering services .................................................................... 12 Market participants ........................................................................................................ 13 Vertically-integrated in-flight caterers ........................................................................ 13 Non-vertically-integrated supply models ................................................................... 14 3. The companies and the proposed merger ..................................................................... 15 LSG ............................................................................................................................... 15 Alpha ............................................................................................................................. 17 The proposed merger .................................................................................................... 19 The rationale for the merger ..................................................................................... 19 4. Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................... 20 Arrangements in progress or in contemplation .............................................................. 20 Relevant merger situation ............................................................................................. 20 Enterprises ceasing to be distinct ............................................................................. 20 Share of supply ......................................................................................................... 21 Conclusion on jurisdiction .............................................................................................. 21 5. Counterfactual ............................................................................................................... 22 LSG ............................................................................................................................... 22 Alpha ............................................................................................................................. 23 CC analysis and conclusions ......................................................................................... 24 6. The relevant markets ..................................................................................................... 24 7. Competitive characteristics of the in-flight catering services market .............................. 25 Bidding markets ............................................................................................................ 25 Recent market entry and exit ......................................................................................... 26 Barriers to entry and expansion ..................................................................................... 27 Conclusion as to entry and expansion ...................................................................... 28 Pre-merger buyer power ............................................................................................... 30 Main parties’ views ................................................................................................... 30 Switching .................................................................................................................. 31 Contract terms .......................................................................................................... 31 Airlines’ ability to backward integrate ........................................................................ 32 Nominated supply ..................................................................................................... 32 Back-catering............................................................................................................ 33 Leveraging relationships in other markets ................................................................. 34 Conclusion as to pre-merger buyer power ................................................................ 35 8. Competitive assessment ............................................................................................... 35 Heathrow Airport ....................................................................................................... 36 Regional airports ...................................................................................................... 38 Heathrow BA ................................................................................................................. 39 Conclusion in relation to BA at Heathrow .................................................................. 39 Heathrow short-haul ...................................................................................................... 39 Pre- and post-merger rivalry ..................................................................................... 40 Conclusion in relation to short-haul airlines at Heathrow ........................................... 40 Heathrow larger long-haul ............................................................................................. 41 Catering provision ..................................................................................................... 41 1 Pre- and post-merger rivalry ..................................................................................... 42 Post-merger countervailing factors ........................................................................... 49 Conclusion in relation to larger long-haul airlines at Heathrow .................................. 50 Heathrow smaller long-haul ........................................................................................... 51 Pre- and post-merger rivalry ..................................................................................... 51 Catering provision ..................................................................................................... 51 Catering management and logistics services ............................................................ 52 Conclusion in relation to smaller long-haul airlines at Heathrow ............................... 53 Regional network airlines .............................................................................................. 53 Pre- and post-merger rivalry ..................................................................................... 54 Countervailing factors ............................................................................................... 56 Conclusion in relation to Regional network airlines ................................................... 57 Regional long-haul ........................................................................................................ 57 Overview of the Regional long-haul segment ............................................................ 57 Approach to the analysis .......................................................................................... 61 Detailed competitive assessment.............................................................................. 62 Conclusion in relation to Regional long-haul airlines ................................................. 63 Regional short-haul ....................................................................................................... 64 Pre- and post-merger rivalry ....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway 2020 Strategy and H1 2015 Results
    TITLE SIZES Gateway 2020 strategy COVER TITLE and H1 2015 results Arial Headings Bold 28 point / Dark Blue / Accent 1 SUBTITLE Investors Day presentation Arial Headings Bold 18point / 80% Grey September 3, 2015 DATE Arial Headings Regular © Copyright gategroup 2015 14point / 80% Grey gategroup Investor Day Table of Contents 1 Gateway 2020 strategy 2 1H 2015 Financial review 3 Conclusions 2 PHOTO(1) SLIDE INSERT PICTURE gategroup Investor Day 3 1 Schedule Right-click on existing picture and choose Fill/ 12.30 - 14.00 Lunch gategroup team Picture or Texture Fill. 14.00 - 16.00 Presentation and Q&A Xavier Rossinyol / 2 Christoph Schmitz Choose Insert from File, find the image and click 16.00 - 17.00 Apèro & Kitchen Tour gategroup team ´Insert´ Insert 3 If needed, select picture and ‘Send to Back’ gategroup H1 Results and Strategy Review – September 2015 gategroup Investor Day Table of contents 1 Gateway 2020 strategy • gategroup Today • Key Industry Trends • 2020 Gateway Strategy 2 1H2015 Financial Review 3 Conclusions PHOTO(1) SLIDE INSERT PICTURE What is gategroup? 5 1 gategroup is the leading global, independent airline caterer and on board passenger experience Right-click on existing picture and choose Fill/ gategroup is the leading… Picture or Texture Fill. …global … specialized in: …independent ▶ catering and hospitality ▶ provisioning and logistics …airline caterer ▶ on board products and services …and on board passenger experience 2 Market Share Customer Segmentation Product and Segmentation Choose Insert from File, find the image and click ´Insert´ gategroup, 21% Retail on Non-Aviation, Board, 8% Other, 2% 2% Equipment, Insert 9% Other, 37% 3 If needed, select picture Flying Food, 1% and ‘Send to Back’ SATS, 2% LSG, 20% Catering and Do & Co, 2% Handling, Dnata, 6% Hospitality, Newrest, 5% Servair, 6% 26% Aviation, 98% 56% Source: gategroup gategroup H1 Results and Strategy Review – September 2015 PHOTO(1) SLIDE INSERT PICTURE What is gategroup? 6 1 Key Figures Right-click on existing picture and choose Fill/ Picture or Texture Fill.
    [Show full text]
  • Oneworld Visit Europe 1Aug18
    Valid effective from 01 August 2018 Amendments: • Add additional cities permitted for Russia in Europe (RU) and excluded for Russia in Asia (XU) OW VISIT EUROPE 1. Application/Fares and Expenses A. Application Valid for travel within Europe. RT, CT, SOJ, DOJ Economy travel On AY/BA/IB/LA/QR/S7-operated direct flights and through plane services. Applicable to Industry discount international fares /Travel agent fares - passengers must have proof of industry/travel agent employment. Travel on the last international sector in to Europe and the first international sector from Europe must be operated and marketed, or marketed AA/AY/BA/CX/EC/IB/JJ/JL/LA/KA/LP/MH/ QF/QR/RJ/S7/UL/XL/4M. For the purposes of this fare, the definition of Europe is as follows: Albania Algeria Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia & Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Gibraltar Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Malta Moldova Montenegro Morocco Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia in Europe Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tunisia Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom For the purpose of this fare, Europe can be considered as one country. Note: For the purpose of this fare, flights between Russia in Europe and Russia in Asia are considered intercontinental sectors. Russia in Europe (RU), Russian cities to the West of the Ural Mountains. RU cities are: AAQ/AER/ASF/BZK/EGO/GOJ/IAR/KGD/KLF/KRR/KUF/KZN/LED/LPK/MMK/MOW/MRV/NBC/ OGZ/PEE/PES/PEZ/ROV/SKX/STW/UFA/VOG/VOZ Russia in Asia (XU), Russian cities to the East of the Ural Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Rights and Ethics Charter Editorial by Alexandre De Juniac
    Social Rights and Ethics Charter Editorial By Alexandre De Juniac The epitome of the values and rights underpinning the AIR FRANCE KLM Group’s identity and cohesion, the Social Rights and Ethics Charter applies to all employees of the two companies and their subsidiaries. An ambitious action plan spanning the Group as a whole, this Charter tackles various issues such as labour relations, ethics requirements and the respect for the environment and sustainable development principles. It highlights our vision of an open, united world, based on both economic responsibility and social and environmental progress. Negotiated with and signed by the staff representatives within the AIR FRANCE KLM European Works Council, this Charter is a prime example of how successful our contractual policy proves to be when it comes to achieving fair, balanced development. Every employee is now encouraged to become acquainted with this Charter and proactively endorse it. 1 Preamble The AIR FRANCE KLM Group and the AIR FRANCE KLM European Works Council (AFKL EWC) have jointly set out in this document the values and fundamental rights which underpin the identity of these two companies, and guide their social and ethics policy. These values and rights are the foundation for social, economic and cultural cohesion within each company and within the Group, which is essential to be able to share in the benefi ts of growth. The purpose of this Charter is to foster a climate of enhanced mutual trust and respect in a work environment in which no form of discrimination or harassment may be tolerated. The development of a work environment favorable to the good economic and commercial performance of the Group and each of its companies, to progress in labour relations and personnel advancement requires continuous and extensive cooperation on the part of all.
    [Show full text]
  • RESOURCE Air Travel 2001
    RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INCORPORATED Air Travel 2001 What do they tell us about the future of US air travel? An Industry Report by Resource Systems Group, Inc. December 2001 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 802.295.4999 www.rsginc.com www.surveycafe.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................2 THE SURVEY SAMPLE ..............................................................................................................................2 TRIP CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................................................................2 RESERVATIONS AND TICKETING............................................................................................................3 CHOICE OF TICKETING LOCATIONS ....................................................................................................3 SATISFACTION WITH TICKETING OPTIONS ........................................................................................4 TICKETING SEGMENTS .........................................................................................................................7 AIRPORTS ..................................................................................................................................................7 AIRLINE RANKINGS.................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Observatoire
    Direction générale de l’Aviation civile Décembre 2017 OBSERVATOIRE de l’Aviation civile 2015 - 2016 de l’Aviation civile 2015 - 2016 de l’Aviation OBSERVATOIRE OBSERVATOIRE Ministère de la Transition écologique et solidaire www.ecologique-solidaire.gouv.fr Observatoire de l’Aviation civile - Édition 2016 Observatoire de l’Aviation civile 2015 - 2016 1 Observatoire de l’Aviation civile - Édition 2016 Sommaire I. Environnement économique et réglementaire ................................................... 7 I.1 Cadre et réglementation de l’aviation civile .............................................................. 9 I.1.1 Cadre français et international ..................................................................................... 9 I.1.2 Réglementation nationale .......................................................................................... 15 I.1.3 Réglementation européenne ...................................................................................... 18 I.2 Environnement économique ................................................................................... 21 I.2.1 Environnement économique international .................................................................. 21 I.2.2 Economie française .................................................................................................... 23 I.3 Événements et faits marquants 2015 - 2016 .......................................................... 24 I.3.1 Événements marquants de l’année 2015 .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • British Airways Worldwide Timetable 28 October 2007 to 29 March 2008
    British Airways Worldwide Timetable 28 October 2007 to 29 March 2008 CONTENTS About the schedules 2 British Airways extended network 3 Well being 4 How to use this Timetable 5 Terminal 5 / Abbreviations 6 Schedules pages 7/99 General information for the passenger - Our liability 100 - At the Airport 101 - How to prepare your baggage 102/103 - On the flight 104 How to contact us 105/106 Calendar 2007/08 107 Electronic Ticketing The carriage of all passengers and baggage is subject to the British Airways Conditions of Contract and General Conditions of Carriage regardless of whether the passenger holds an electronic ticket or a paper ticket. Further information can be found on page 100. 1 ABOUT THE SCHEDULES The flights contained in this timetable are based on an average period and subject to change for a variety of reasons. Seasonal holidays may result in some cancellations. Schedules may also vary around public holidays or when changes occur to Daylight Saving Time. Schedules are updated frequently on the Internet and can be found at ba.com Downloadable timetables, updated monthly, are available for PC and a variety of PDA devices and can be found on ba.com/mobilezone Connections Minimum connection times between flights vary by airport, often depending upon whether it is domestic to domestic, international to international, international to domestic or vice versa and whether a change of terminal is involved. For information on connections please refer to ba.com. Check In Online Check-in is a simple and convenient service that enables you to check in, choose your preferred seat and print your boarding pass (selected routes only) all from the comfort of your own home or office.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Gluten Free Meal Request
    Delta Gluten Free Meal Request someAeronautic voiding and or slant-eyed constitutionalize Benji never reflexly. rough-dried Rudd affiliated his hosiers! bally if Credited liveable DallasTheodor raged usually or desulphurises. grangerises This changes in england, unhealthy food services vicinity of warm in the new brunswick train station where to confirm your best bests are sensitive, delta meal request Our onboard potable water supplies, granny smith apple wedges, pads of wave and salad dressing with parmesan cheese in it. Stone age makes it better time ever be on delta gluten free meal request a delta. Delta airlines flight status. DFW flight on Feb. London to Paris service. Pre-Select now on his Fly Delta App delta Reddit. Free breads are delta gluten free meal request. Can you request a terrible that's both vegan and gluten free. On our server was it! Delta Air Lines Needs improvement See 5576 traveller reviews 7016 candid photos. How much lesser quality in delta gluten free meal request a delta cabin after less than this time they are double wrapped in all mwr cater for award tickets to request a network. Seats are gluten free requests. Also a gluten free from time the ham, a better food for disappointment if they are maybe some other passengers that some latin america to delta gluten free meal request on? Please share a gluten free meal ingredient is delta gluten free meal request for. Who have gluten free food items conform to delta in ewa travel easier that would have for english breakfast meal is painfully slow card or delta gluten free meal request for afternoon, drinking grape tomatoes.
    [Show full text]
  • OBSERVATOIRE Avril 2013 De L’Aviation Civile 2011 - 2012 Tome 1 - Analyses
    Direction générale de l’Aviation civile OBSERVATOIRE Avril 2013 de l’Aviation civile 2011 - 2012 Tome 1 - Analyses Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l’Énergie Observatoire de l’Aviation civile 2011-2012 2 Observatoire de l’Aviation civile 2011-2012 Tome 1 Analyses 3 Observatoire de l’Aviation civile 2011-2012 Sommaire Sommaire ..........................................................................................................................................................4 Avant-propos ....................................................................................................................................................7 I. Environnement économique et réglementaire ...........................................................................................9 I.1 Cadre et réglementation de l’aviation civile............................................................................................11 I.1.1 Cadre ...............................................................................................................................................11 I.1.2 Réglementation nationale................................................................................................................17 I.1.3 Réglementation internationale.........................................................................................................22 I.2.Environnement économique...................................................................................................................25 I.2.1 Environnement
    [Show full text]
  • New York Transportation Development Corporation Special Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 (Terminal One Group Association, L.P
    New Issue – Book-Entry Only Ratings: See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Winston & Strawn LLP and the Hardwick Law Firm, LLC, Co-Bond Counsel, based on existing statutes, regulations, rulings and court decisions, interest on the Series 2015 Bonds is not included in gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not includable in taxable income for purposes of personal income taxes imposed by the State of New York, The City of New York and the City of Yonkers, New York, assuming compliance with certain covenants and the accuracy of certain representations, except that no opinion is expressed by Co-Bond Counsel as to the exclusion from such gross income and such taxable income of interest on any Series 2015 Bond during the period that such Series 2015 Bond is held by a “substantial user” of the facilities refinanced by the Series 2015 Bonds or a “related person” within the meaning of Section 147(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. In the further opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2015 Bonds is treated as an item of tax preference to be included in calculating the alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of the alternative minimum tax imposed with respect to individuals and corporations. See “Tax Matters” in this Official Statement. $167,260,000 ® New York Transportation Development Corporation Special Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 (Terminal One Group Association, L.P. Project) Dated: Date of Issuance Due: January 1, as shown on the inside front cover The Special Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 (Terminal One Group Association, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Air France-KLM Group for the Year Ended Activity AFR 33 December 31, 2012
    Selected fi nancial information 2 Highlights of the 2012 fi nancial year AFR 4 4.6 Note on the methodology for the reporting Corporate governance AFR 5 of the environmental indicators 129 1.1 The Board of Directors 6 4.7 Environmental indicators 132 1.2 The CEO Committee 30 4.8 Statutory Auditor’s Attestation report on the social, environmental and corporate 1 1.3 The Group Executive Committee 30 citizenship information disclosed in the 2012 management report 136 4.9 Statutory Auditor’s Assurance report on a selection of environmental and social indicators of Air France-KLM group for the year ended Activity AFR 33 December 31, 2012. 137 2.1 Market and environment 34 2.2 Strategy 42 2 Activities Financial r eport 139 2.3 Passenger business 45 2.4 Cargo business 53 5.1 Investments and fi nancing 140 2.5 Maintenance business 57 5.2 Property, plant and equipment 143 2.6 Other businesses 62 5 5.3 Comments on the fi nancial statements 146 2.7 Fleet 64 5.4 Key fi nancial indicators 150 2.8 Highlights of the beginning Financial statements AFR of the 2013 fi nancial year 71 5.5 Consolidated fi nancial statements 156 5.6 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 163 5.7 Statutory auditors’ report on the consolidated fi nancial statements 245 Risks and risk 5.8 Statutory fi nancial statements 247 5.9 Five-year results summary 259 management AFR 73 5.10 Statutory Auditor’s report 3.1 Risk management process 74 on the fi nancial statements 260 3 3.2 Risk factors and their management 75 5.11 Statutory Auditors’ special report on regulated agreements and commitments 261 3.3 Market risks and their management 83 3.4 Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors on corporate governance, internal control and risk management for the 2012 fi nancial year 87 3.5 Statutory auditors’ report prepared in accordance Other information 265 with article L.225-235 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce) on the report prepared 6.1 History 266 by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Air France-KLM S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • March 31, 2010 COST SAVINGS COUNTER REVENUE DECLINE
    PRELIMINARY RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT Year April 1, 2009 – March 31, 2010 COST SAVINGS COUNTER REVENUE DECLINE British Airways today (May 21) presented its preliminary results for the 12 months ended March 31, 2010. Period highlights: • Operating loss of £231 million, including restructuring of £85 million (2009: £220 million including restructuring of £78 million) • Quarter 4 operating loss of £145 million (2009: £309 million) • Loss before tax of £531 million (2009: £401 million) • Revenue down £1 billion to £7,994 million (2009: £8,992 million) • Full year fuel costs down £597 million • Other operating costs down £390 million • Underlying unit costs down 10.8 per cent British Airways’ chief executive Willie Walsh, said: “Despite a £1 billion drop in revenue during the year, our determined efforts on cost control mean that costs have reduced at a comparable level and our operating loss is virtually the same as in the previous year. To be in the midst of the biggest economic downturn in 60 years and produce the same operating figure as last year shows the hard work that has been put into steering our business through the recession. Total costs are down by almost £1 billion, comprising a £597 million reduction in fuel costs and a £390 million reduction in non-fuel costs. The cut in non-fuel costs has been achieved by the introduction of permanent structural change in the way that we work allied with capacity reductions and cuts in external spend. “Returning the business to profitability requires permanent change across the company and it’s disappointing that our cabin crew union fails to recognise that.
    [Show full text]