Studies in English, New Series Volume 9 Article 3 1-1-1991 The Framing of Charles W. Chesnutt: Practical Deconstruction in the Afro-American Tradition Craig Werner University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/studies_eng_new Part of the American Literature Commons Recommended Citation Werner, Craig (1991) "The Framing of Charles W. Chesnutt: Practical Deconstruction in the Afro-American Tradition," Studies in English, New Series: Vol. 9 , Article 3. Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/studies_eng_new/vol9/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in English, New Series by an authorized editor of eGrove. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Werner: The Framing of Charles W. Chesnutt THE FRAMING OF CHARLES W. CHESNUTT: PRACTICAL DECONSTRUCTION IN THE AFRO-AMERICAN TRADITION Craig Werner University of Wisconsin First, three quotations. “Under exegetical pressure, self-reference demonstrates the impossibility of self-possession. When poems denounce poetry as lies, self-referentiality is the source of undecidability, which is not ambiguity but a structure of logical irresolvability: if a poem speaks true in describing poetry as lies, then it lies; but if its claim that poems lie is a lie, then it must speak true.”—Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism (202). “They ain’t no different from nobody else....They mouth cut cross ways, ain’t it? Well, long as you don’t see no man wid they mouth cut up and down, you know they’ll all lie jus’ like de rest of us.”—Zora Neale Hurston, Mules and Men (22).