DOCSLIB.ORG

Abbreviations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abbreviations AbbreviAtions AIA Associazione Italiana per l’Arbitrato (Italian Association for Arbitration) ALA Alleanza Liberalpopolare–Autonomie (Liberal Popular Alliance–Autonomies) ANAC Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione (National Anti- corruption Authority) ANAS Nazionale Autonoma delle Strade (National Roads Department) ANCI Associazione Nazionale Comuni Italiani (National Association of Italian Municipalities) ANM Associazione Nazionale Magistrati (National Magistrates Association) ANPI Associazione Nazionale Partigiani d’Italia (National Association of Italian Partisans) ANSA Agenzia Nazionale Stampa Associata (National Associated Press Agency) AP Area Popolare (Popular Area) APE Anticipo Pensionistico (early retirement) CEAS Common European Asylum System CD Centro Democratico (Democratic Center) CEI Conferenza Episcopale Italiana (Italian Episcopal Conference) CGIL Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (Italian General Confederation of Labor) CISE Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali (Italian Center for Electoral Studies) CISL Confederazione Italiana Sindicati dei Lavoratori (Italian Confederation of Workers’ Trade Unions) CGIL Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (Italian General Confederation of Labor) Italian Politics: The Great Reform That Never Was 32 (2017): vii–ix © Berghahn Books doi:10.3167/ip.2017.320101 viii Abbreviations CI Civici e Innovatori (Civics and Innovators) CL Comunione e Liberazione (Communion and Liberation) CNEL Consiglio Nazionale dell’Economia e del Lavoro (National Council for Economics and Labor) CONI Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (Italian National Olympic Committee) CONSOB Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Italian Securities and Exchange Commission) COSPE Cooperazione per lo Sviluppo dei Paesi Emergenti (Cooperation for the Development of Emerging Countries) CpE Centristi per l’Europa (Centrists for Europe) CR Conservatori e Riformisti (Conservatives and Reformists) DS Democratici di Sinistra (Left Democrats) EBA European Banking Authority ECB European Central Bank ENA Emergenza Nord Africa (North Africa Emergency plan) ENI Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi (Italian National Petroleum Corporation) ENP European Neighbourhood Policy EPP European People’s Party EU European Union FdI Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy) FdS Federazione della Sinistra (Federation of the Left) FI Forza Italia GAL Grandi Autonomie e Libertà (Grand Autonomies and Freedom) GdF Guardia di Finanza (Fiscal Police) GDP Gross domestic product GNA Government of National Accord (Libya) IdV Italia dei Valori (Italy of Values) INPS Istituto Nazionale Previdenza Sociale (National Social Security Institute) IOM International Organization for Migration IRES Imposta sul Reddito sulle Società (corporate income tax) IRPEF Imposta sul Reddito delle Persone Fisiche (personal income tax) ISIS Islamic State of Iraq and Syria ISPI Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale (Institute for International Political Studies) ISTAT Istituto Nazionale de Statistica (National Institute of Statistics) LN Lega Nord (Northern League) MA Movimento Arancione (Orange Movement) Abbreviations ix MEDU Medici per i Diritti Umani (Doctors for Human Rights) MENA Middle East and North Africa MEP Member of the European Parliament M5S Movimento 5 Stelle (Five Star Movement) MP Member of Parliament MPS Monte dei Paschi di Siena bank MSE Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (Ministry of Economic Development) MSI Movimento Sociale Italiano (Italian Social Movement) NAR Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari (Armed Revolutionary Core) NCD Nuovo Centrodestra (New Center-Right) OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries PACS Pacte civil de solidarité (civil solidarity pacts) PCI Partito Comunista Italiano (Italian Communist Party) PD Partito Democratico (Democratic Party) PdCI Partito dei Comunisti Italiani (Party of Italian Communists) PdL Popolo della Libertà (People of Freedom) PDS Partito Democratico della Sinistra (Democratic Party of the Left) PR Partito Radicale (Radical Party) PRC Partito della Rifondazione Comunista (Communist Refoundation Party) PSI Partito Socialista Italiano (Italian Socialist Party) RI Radicali Italiani (Italian Radicals) SACE Servizi Assicurativi del Commercio Estero (Italian Export Credit Agency) SC Scelta Civica per l’Italia (Civic Choice) SEL Sinistra Ecologia e Libertà (Left Ecology and Freedom) SI Sinistra Italiana (Italian Left) SPRAR Sistema di Protezione per Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati (Protection System for Asylum-Seekers and Refugees) SVP Südtiroler Volkspartei (South Tyrolean People’s Party) UdC Unione di Centro (Union of the Center) UIL Unione Italiana del Lavoro (Italian Union of Labor) UN United Nations UNAR Ufficio Nazionale Antidiscriminazioni Razziali (National Office against Racial Discrimination) UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UPI Unione delle Province Italiane (Union of Italian Provinces) US United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Transformation of Italian Democracy
    Bulletin of Italian Politics Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, 29-47 The Transformation of Italian Democracy Sergio Fabbrini University of Trento Abstract: The history of post-Second World War Italy may be divided into two distinct periods corresponding to two different modes of democratic functioning. During the period from 1948 to 1993 (commonly referred to as the First Republic), Italy was a consensual democracy; whereas the system (commonly referred to as the Second Republic) that emerged from the dramatic changes brought about by the end of the Cold War functions according to the logic of competitive democracy. The transformation of Italy’s political system has thus been significant. However, there remain important hurdles on the road to a coherent institutionalisation of the competitive model. The article reconstructs the transformation of Italian democracy, highlighting the socio-economic and institutional barriers that continue to obstruct a competitive outcome. Keywords: Italian politics, Models of democracy, Parliamentary government, Party system, Interest groups, Political change. Introduction As a result of the parliamentary elections of 13-14 April 2008, the Italian party system now ranks amongst the least fragmented in Europe. Only four party groups are represented in the Senate and five in the Chamber of Deputies. In comparison, in Spain there are nine party groups in the Congreso de los Diputados and six in the Senado; in France, four in the Assemblée Nationale an d six in the Sénat; and in Germany, six in the Bundestag. Admittedly, as is the case for the United Kingdom, rather fewer parties matter in those democracies in terms of the formation of governments: generally not more than two or three.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Elections of 2010: Much Ado About Nothing?
    Bulletin of Italian Politics Vol. 2, No. 1, 2010, 137-45 The Regional Elections of 2010: Much Ado about Nothing? Antonio Floridia Electoral Observatory of the Region of Tuscany Abstract: This article, taking its point of departure from the research presented at the annual workshop of the Italian Society for Electoral Studies, analyses the principal outcomes of the elections held in 13 Italian regions on 27 and 28 March 2010. One of the most significant features of these elections is that they do not appear to have resulted in any major changes with respect to the electoral cycle initiated in Italy by the parliamentary elections of 2008. Featuring a very low level of turnout, typical of “second-order” elections and affecting all the parties, the only winners were the parties (the Northern League and Italy of Values) which managed to consolidate their support or limit their losses. The article then analyses in more detail the result obtained by the Democratic Party and dwells on the fact that the success of the centre right, despite winning four of the regions previously governed by the centre left, does not seem, however, to have reinforced the Berlusconi government due to the growing political significance of the League and the conflicts this produces. Ultimately, the regional elections have highlighted all of the dillemmas affecting Italian politics without resolving any of them. Keywords: Berlusconi, regional elections, Lega Nord, Democratic Party As it has become accustomed to doing in the wake of a round of elections, SISE, the Italian Society for Electoral Studies (Società Italiana di Studi Elettorali), decided this year too to organise a workshop – which took place in Milan on 10 May, a few weeks after the regional elections, at the headquarters, and with the support of the Milan provincial government.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 4. Case Studies in Italy
    Poster elaborated by the working table ‘Creative use of law.’ National Assembly of the Italian Network for the commons. Naples, Ex Asilo Filangieri, 17/2/2019. ERC-COG-2016-724692 HETEROPOLITICS Refiguring the Common and the Political D3.4 Author: Dr. Antonio Vesco Host Institution: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Principal Investigator: Dr. A. Kioupkiolis ERC COG 2016 (implementation 2017-2020) July 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ιntroduction to the case studies in Italy........................................................................5 Commons in Italy......................................................................................................6 Legal constructs for the practice of the commons in Italy......................................10 Urban movements and local institutions.................................................................16 Urban commons and Italian urban contexts............................................................18 Naples and Turin: two case studies in dialogue.......................................................22 The difficult management of the commons and the role played by rules................24 Attempts to found a national network of ‘common goods’.....................................25 The ethnographer and the morality of the commons: theoretical and methodological reflections.......................................................................................29 4. Case studies in Italy................................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses TERRONI AND POLENTONI: WHERE DOES THE TRUTH LIE? AN ANTHROPOLOGY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS AND ETHNICITY IN PALERMO (SICILY), ITALY. PARDALIS, STERGIOS How to cite: PARDALIS, STERGIOS (2009) TERRONI AND POLENTONI: WHERE DOES THE TRUTH LIE? AN ANTHROPOLOGY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS AND ETHNICITY IN PALERMO (SICILY), ITALY. , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/289/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 TERRONI AND POLENTONI: WHERE DOES THE TRUTH LIE? AN ANTHROPOLOGY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS AND ETHNICITY IN PALERMO (SICILY), ITALY. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN DECEMBER 2009 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH OF DURHAM UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY Stergios Pardalis Stergios Pardalis: ‘Terroni and Polentoni: Where Does the Truth Lie? An Anthropology of Social Networks and Ethnicity in Palermo (Sicily), Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Method and Application for Studying Political Text in Multiple Languages
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School THE RADICAL RIGHT IN PARLIAMENT: A NEW METHOD AND APPLICATION FOR STUDYING POLITICAL TEXT IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES A Dissertation in Political Science by Mitchell Goist Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2020 ii The dissertation of Mitchell Goist was reviewed and approved* by the following: Burt L. Monroe Liberal Arts Professor of Political Science Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Bruce Desmarais Associate Professor of Political Science Matt Golder Professor of Political Science Sarah Rajtmajer Assistant Professor of Information Science and Tecnology Glenn Palmer Professor of Political Science and Director of Graduate Studies iii ABSTRACT Since a new wave of radical right support in the early 1980s, scholars have sought to understand the motivations and programmatic appeals of far-right parties. However, due to their small size and dearth of data, existing methodological approaches were did not allow the direct study of these parties’ behavior in parliament. Using a collection of parliamentary speeches from the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, and the Czech Re- public, Chapter 1 of this dissertation addresses this problem by developing a new model for the study of political text in multiple languages. Using this new method allows the construction of a shared issue space where each party is embedded regardless of the language spoken in the speech or the country of origin. Chapter 2 builds on this new method by explicating the ideolog- ical appeals of radical right parties. It finds that in some instances radical right parties behave similarly to mainstream, center-right parties, but distinguish themselves by a focus on individual crime and an emphasis on negative rhetorical frames.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Freedom, and Democracy OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, Spi OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi Equality, Freedom, and Democracy OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi Equality, Freedom, and Democracy Europe After the Great Recession By LEONARDO MORLINO with DANIELA PIANA MARIO QUARANTA FRANCESCO RANIOLO CECILIA EMMA SOTTILOTTA CLAUDIUS WAGEMANN 1 OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Leonardo Morlino 2020. Some rights reserved. © Chapter 2 © Leonardo Morlino, Claudius Wagemann, and Francesco Raniolo 2020. Chapter 3 © Leonardo Morlino and Daniela Piana 2020. Chapter 4 © Leonardo Morlino, Mario Quaranta, and Francesco Raniolo 2020. Chapter 5 © Leonardo Morlino and Francesco Raniolo 2020. Chapter 6 © Leonardo Morlino and Daniela Piana 2020. Chapter 7 © Leonardo Morlino, Daniela Piana, and Cecilia Sottilotta 2020. The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2020 Impression: 1 Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV∗
    The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV∗ Ruben Durantey Paolo Pinottiz Andrea Teseix August 2018 Abstract We study the political impact of commercial television in Italy exploiting the stag- gered introduction of Berlusconi's private TV network, Mediaset, in the early 1980s. We find that individuals with early access to Mediaset all-entertainment content were more likely to vote for Berlusconi's party in 1994, when he first ran for office. The effect persists for five elections and is driven by heavy TV viewers, namely the very young and the elderly. Regarding possible mechanisms, we find that individ- uals exposed to entertainment TV as children were less cognitively sophisticated and civic-minded as adults, and ultimately more vulnerable to Berlusconi's populist rhetoric. Keywords: Entertainment TV, Voting, Cognitive Abilities, Civic Engagement JEL codes: L82, D72, Z13 ∗We thank Alberto Alesina, Filipe Campante, Antonio Ciccone, Stefano DellaVigna, Ruben Enikolopov, Ray Fisman, Greg Huber, Brian Knight, Valentino Larcinese, Marco Manacorda, Torsten Persson, Barbara Petrongolo, Andrei Shleifer, Francesco Sobbrio, Joachim Voth, David Weil, Katia Zhu- ravskaya, and seminar participants at Bocconi, CREI, NYU, MIT, Sciences Po, Brown, Dartmouth, Sorbonne, WZB, Surrey, Queen Mary, Yale, EIEF, LSE, Namur, Bank of Italy, Warwick, UPF, and participants at the AEA Meetings, the EUI Conference on Communications and Media Markets, and the Lisbon Meeting on Institutions and Political Economy for helpful comments. We are very grateful to Ben Olken and Ruben Enikolopov for their help with the ITM software. We thank Nicola D'Amelio and Giuseppe Piraino for their assistance with data collection and Laura Litvine for her outstanding help with the digitization of the transmitters data.
    [Show full text]
  • English Version of This Report Is the Only Official Document
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 4 March 2018 ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report Warsaw 6 June 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................... 3 III. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 3 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................. 4 V. ELECTORAL SYSTEM .............................................................................................................. 5 VI. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .............................................................................................. 6 VII. VOTER REGISTRATION .......................................................................................................... 8 VIII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION ................................................................................................ 9 IX. ELECTION CAMPAIGN .......................................................................................................... 11 X. CAMPAIGN FINANCE............................................................................................................. 12 XI. MEDIA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Country Review
    Italy 2016 Country Review http://www.countrywatch.com Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 3 Italy 4 Europe 5 Chapter 2 7 Political Overview 7 History 8 Political Conditions 11 Political Risk Index 84 Political Stability 98 Freedom Rankings 114 Human Rights 126 Government Functions 128 Government Structure 131 Principal Government Officials 146 Leader Biography 150 Leader Biography 151 Foreign Relations 155 National Security 165 Defense Forces 168 Chapter 3 170 Economic Overview 170 Economic Overview 171 Nominal GDP and Components 197 Population and GDP Per Capita 199 Real GDP and Inflation 200 Government Spending and Taxation 201 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 202 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 203 Data in US Dollars 204 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 205 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 207 World Energy Price Summary 208 CO2 Emissions 209 Agriculture Consumption and Production 210 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 213 Metals Consumption and Production 214 World Metals Pricing Summary 217 Economic Performance Index 218 Chapter 4 230 Investment Overview 230 Foreign Investment Climate 231 Foreign Investment Index 235 Corruption Perceptions Index 248 Competitiveness Ranking 259 Taxation 268 Stock Market 270 Partner Links 270 Chapter 5 272 Social Overview 272 People 273 Human Development Index 274 Life Satisfaction Index 278 Happy Planet Index 289 Status of Women 298 Global Gender Gap Index 301 Culture and Arts 311 Etiquette 311 Travel Information 314 Diseases/Health
    [Show full text]
  • A Constitutional Patriotism for Italian Democracy: the Contribution of President Napolitano
    Bulletin of Italian Politics Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011, 159-84 A Constitutional Patriotism for Italian Democracy: The Contribution of President Napolitano Gaspare Nevola University of Trento Giorgio Napolitano, Il patto che ci lega. Per una coscienza repubblicana , Bologna: il Mulino, 2009, pb €12.00, pp. 232, ISBN 978-88-15-13433-2. I. In a parliamentary democratic republic, the President, elected by Parliament, has the institutional tasks of ensuring compliance with the Constitution (and therefore the constitutional conformity of legislative activity) and that of representing the unity of the State and the Nation. The political role and weight of the President vary according to the person who occupies the office and in relation to specific political circumstances and institutional dynamics. In recent Italian political history, the Presidency of the Republic has become a political/institutional linkage of unprecedented importance – at least at times of change, or at critical junctures, when democracy has had to deal with challenges to its regular functioning, its quality, and its resilience. Since the 1990s, Italy, more than other European democracies, has faced challenges of this kind provoked by an interweaving between external and internal factors.1 It is no coincidence that during the 1990s there was talk of a ‘Second Republic’ following the demise of the ‘First’ one. It may be exaggerated or inappropriate to speak of a ‘Second Republic’, but what is certain is that the ‘First’ has gone – or at least is by now unrecognisable. 2 During this long critical conjuncture, Italy has also been forced to question itself about its ‘political identity’ as a State, a nation, and a constitutional democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study
    European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study Release Notes Sebastian Adrian Popa Hermann Schmitt Sara B Hobolt Eftichia Teperoglou Original release 1 January 2015 MZES, University of Mannheim Acknowledgement of the data Users of the data are kindly asked to acknowledge use of the data by always citing both the data and the accompanying release document. How to cite this data: Schmitt, Hermann; Popa, Sebastian A.; Hobolt, Sara B.; Teperoglou, Eftichia (2015): European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1. 12300 and Schmitt H, Hobolt SB and Popa SA (2015) Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, Online first available for download from: http://eup.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/06/03/1465116515584626.full How to cite this document: Sebastian Adrian Popa, Hermann Schmitt, Sara B. Hobolt, and Eftichia Teperoglou (2015) EES 2014 Voter Study Advance Release Notes. Mannheim: MZES, University of Mannheim. Acknowledgement of assistance The 2014 EES voter study was funded by a consortium of private foundations under the leadership of Volkswagen Foundation (the other partners are: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Stiftung Mercator, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian). It profited enormously from to synergies that emerged from the co-operation with the post-election survey funded by the European Parliament. Last but certainly not least, it benefited from the generous support of TNS Opinion who did the fieldwork in all the 28 member countries . The study would not have been possible the help of many colleagues, both members of the EES team and country experts form the wider academic community, who spent valuable time on the questionnaire and study preparation, often at very short notice.
    [Show full text]