Australian Wolf Spiders Volker Framenau "Wolf Spiders? Aren’T They All Large, Hairy and Really Wolf Spiders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Australian Wolf Spiders Volker Framenau Newsletter of the Land for Wildlife Scheme July 2009 Vol. 13, Number 3 NEWSLETTER OF THE LAND FOR WILDLIFE SCHEME REGISTERED BY AUSTRALIA POST PRINT POST: 606811/00007 DANCES WITH WOLVES - AUSTRALIAN WOLF SPIDERS Volker Framenau "Wolf spiders? Aren’t they all large, hairy and really wolf spiders. The second character unique to wolf spiders dangerous?" This is a common question asked by many is their mobile brood care. After mating, females will people when I tell them what I am doing for a living. construct a spherical eggsac in which they lay their Let’s get some of these misconceptions straight! eggs; around 3-5 in the small Zoica species and up to Wolf spiders, scientifically and may be more than 1,000 in the known as the spider family largest spiders. The females then Lycosidae, may be large, i.e. up fix this eggsac to their spinnerets to 30 mm body length or so (not and will carry it everywhere they counting the legs), but many are go (Fig.1). Often, in burrowing also much smaller when fully species, females will expose the grown. In fact, one of the smallest eggsac to the sun, possibly to speed wolf spiders known is the tiny up the development of the eggs. Zoica minuta that was discovered After the young spiderlings on the Old Argyle Station in the hatch from their eggs and leave Kimberley region of WA in the late the eggsac with the help of their 1970s. The body of these spiders is mother, they do not immediately only up to 1.5 mm (!) long. Wolf disperse. They climb onto the spiders are only moderately hairy Fig. 1: Artoria mckayi, female with eggsac (Avon female’s abdomen where special (in particular compared to other River, Victoria). (V. Framenau) hairs allow them to hold on for spiders) and often display striking another 2-4 weeks, piggybacking colour patterns (e.g. Figs 3 and 4). wherever mum goes to avoid They are not dangerous to humans, hazardous situations. Often, there although bites of the larger species are so many spiderlings on a female, might hurt for a while (but not more that they also cover the carapace of than a bee sting). the mother which is barely visible What characterises a wolf spider? underneath. This mobile brood care, A number of features differentiate in combination with their diversity wolf spiders from all other spiders. in hunting strategies (vagrant Morphologically, wolf spiders have to permanently burrowing; see below) and their efficient dispersal a unique eye pattern, with a single Fig. 2: Tetralycosa alteripa, juvenile (Lake Lefroy, row of four small frontal eyes, and Western Australia). (V. Framenau) capabilities via ballooning (wind four additional large eyes, situated dispersal on a strand of silk), is in almost a square, on top and in the frontal half of their thought to be responsible for the huge ecological success carapace (Fig. 2 and 3). Some of the larger eyes have a of wolf spiders. With almost 2,400 scientifically described highly reflective structure, the tapetum, that reflects light species worldwide, they are the fourth largest spider and allows nocturnal spotlighting of even the smallest family. Around 160 species are currently described from continued on page 4 1 Western Wildlife Vol 13 No. 3 EDITORIAL Greetings! habitat".* Certainly, let’s celebrate of the holding". Eighty years on, LFW celebrated reaching a the biodiversity, but how have we it is these ‘desirable’ trees that are significant milestone when the changed our land use activities being removed. 2,000th property was registered. to reverse the exceptional loss of As well as the international The Minister for the Environment habitat? biodiversity hotspot list, Australia presented a certificate to Glenn Why, for example, are we has also listed 15 sites that are Dewhurst of the Black Cockatoo permitting the removal of huge old national hotspots. The Pilbara is Rehabilitation Centre, surrounded roadside or paddock trees whose one of these. Read Stephen van by well-wishers and very noisy hollows provide nesting sites and, Leeuwen’s summary of findings cockatoos. See page 3 for more if marris, whose blossom sustains from the recent Pilbara Biological details. nectar-feeding fauna including Survey to see just why this area honeyeaters throughout the autumn Just what is a ‘biodiversity qualifies. From the same region, feed gap? Isn’t this somewhat hotspot’? Stephen Davies reminisces about short-sighted? In the WA Centenary one of the region’s interesting We probably all know by now publication The Story of a Hundred animals, the pebble mound mouse. that the south-west of WA has been Years (1929) the then Director of identified as a ‘global biodiversity Agriculture, G. L. Sutton says "So We continue to get fascinating hotspot’. We tend to be really proud great has been the desire of the settler stories from members, and in this of this, as it celebrates our truly to conquer the forest and produce issue you will read about boodies, outstanding natural diversity, but we crops that far too little timber has phascogales (two species), leucistic should not forget that the definition been left for the purposes of shade, cockies, ants and another snake tale. of these ‘hotspots’ does not just relate shelter and firewood. This defect And note how the real-life bush to the flora and fauna. The term is recognised by many of the later detective led to information about refers to an area where "exceptional settlers, who are leaving clumps a fascinating group of creatures. concentrations of endemic species of trees in the paddocks as well as Have you got a story you would like are undergoing exceptional loss of strips of uncleared land, one chain to share? What about something or more wide, on the boundaries botanical? INDEX of their paddocks. This practice is most desirable and should become Penny Hussey Antics __________________________ 12 general. It adds alike to the [* For ref, contact Ed.] A piebald cockie __________________ 13 usefulness and the attractiveness A wambenger story _______________ 15 Biodiversity of an economic hotspot ___ 6 Boodie rats ______________________ 12 Contact details for Land for Wildlife Officers Bush detective ___________________ 4 Celebration of the 2000th registration___ 3 Name Location Phone Email Dances with wolves ________________ 1 Heather Adamson Mandurah (08) 9582 9333 [email protected] Editorial _________________________ 2 Looking through the phone book _____ 14 Avril Baxter Narrogin (08) 9881 9218 [email protected] Mystery animal 'droppings' are beetle 'push- Fiona Falconer Coorow (08) 9952 1074 [email protected] ups' ___________________________ 16 Newly-naturalised bindweed –––––––– 19 Wayne Gill Esperance (08) 9083 2100 [email protected] Pebble-mound mice ________________ 9 Claire Hall Perth (08) 9334 0427 [email protected] RabbitScan ______________________19 Swan Weeds Database ___________ 19 Mal Harper Merredin (08) 9041 2488 [email protected] The genus Gompholobium _________ 10 Sheila Howat Bridgetown (08) 9761 2405 [email protected] The murdering animal ____________ 18 Western ground parrots distinct from eastern Penny Hussey Perth (08) 9334 0530 [email protected] ground parrots ___________________ 17 Cherie Kemp Busselton (08) 9752 5533 [email protected] Wildflowers of the Great Southern ____ 18 Wonderful Wongan Wildlife! _________ 20 Zara Kivell Mundaring (08) 9295 9112 [email protected] Sylvia Leighton Albany (08) 9842 4500 [email protected] USE OF ARTICLES FROM WESTERN WILDLIFE Material may be reproduced without permission as long as Dorothy Redreau Albany (08) 9842 4500 [email protected] the source is acknowledged and the article is reproduced in its entirety without any alterations. If you wish to use only Philip Worts Kojonup (08) 9831 0832 [email protected] part of an article, please liaise with the Editor. www.dec.wa.gov.au/landforwildlife 2 Newsletter of the Land for Wildlife Scheme A Celebration of the 2000th Registration! In the years since LFW first started Glenn responded with an outline in 1997, over 2000 landholders have of the future for the BCRC, and registered their properties with the a huge vote of thanks to all scheme. It was decided to celebrate volunteers. the 2000th at Kaarakin, the Black The site is vested in the City Cockatoo Rehabilitation Centre of Gosnells, and the Mayor, Cr (BCRC). Olwen Searle JP, outlined the The BCRC had recently moved many initiatives that the City has from private property to a site vested undertaken to maintain biodiversity in the City of Gosnells, formerly on its land. She, too, praised occupied by the Cohunu Wildlife volunteers. Park. The 16 hectare site has some Refreshments were then served, good bushland, but also areas of and Kaarakin volunteers took groups overgrazed kangaroo enclosures, of visitors around to see the facilities so the LFW report concentrated on and get close to these beautiful bushland rehabilitation techniques. birds. Coincidentally, this location demonstrates how threatened species can unite all levels of the community in working to ensure their survival. State and local government, community groups, private landholders and volunteers The Minister with a symbolic firestick. are all involved in helping Kaarakin (Maureen Griffiths) become established, and all were represented at the celebration, as as a symbol of the importance of fire well as a large number of LFW in caring for country. members. The Department of Environment and Conservation’s Director The occasion began with a Harmony was a great favourite! Here she ‘welcome to country’ from Nyoongar General, Keiran McNamara, is with Cr Julie Brown, Deputy Mayor, City elder Trevor Walley.
Recommended publications
  • Araneae: Lycosidae: Zoicinae)
    Zootaxa 3904 (2): 293–297 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3904.2.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD269219-5572-44FB-8D42-6AE7A4CF3606 First record of the wolf spider genus Lysania Thorell, 1890 from India with the description of a new species (Araneae: Lycosidae: Zoicinae) JOBI J. MALAMEL, PRADEEP M. SANKARAN1, MATHEW M. JOSEPH & POTHALIL A. SEBASTIAN Division of Arachnology, Department of Zoology, Sacred Heart College, Thevara, Cochin, Kerala 682 013, India 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The lycosid spider genus Lysania Thorell, 1890 contains just three species found in Borneo, China and Malaysia (World Spider Catalog 2014), which build small, horizontal, sheet-like webs (Lehtinen & Hippa 1979; Li et al. 2013). Members of the genus are characterised by having a male pedipalp without an articulated median apophysis, a beak-like lateral apophysis and wider conductor and female genitalia with a central/median hairy plate and long copulatory ducts (Lehtinen & Hippa 1979; Li et al. 2013). Lysania deangia Li, Wang and Zhang (described from China) and L. pygmaea Thorell, 1890 (described from China and Malaysia) are known from both males and females, while L. sabahensis Lehtinen and Hippa, 1979 (described from Borneo) is known only from females (World Spider Catalog 2014). Here we provide the description and illustration of a new Lysania species from the Western Ghats, one of the biodiversity hotspots of the world (Myers et al. 2000), in the Kerala region of southern India.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • L:\PM IJA Vol.3.Pmd
    © Indian Society of Arachnology ISSN 2278 - 1587 SPIDER FAUNA OF RADHANAGARI WILDLIFE SANC- TUARY, CHANDOLI NATIONAL PARK AND KOYNA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY Suvarna More and Vijay Sawant* P. V. P. Mahavidyalaya, Kavathe Mahankal, Sangli. *Former Professor and Head, Department of Zoology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur. ABSTRACT Diversity of spiders from Radhanagari Wildlife Sanctuary, Chandoli Na- tional Park and Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary in Western Ghats is studied for the first time. A total of 247 species belonging to 119 genera and 28 families are recorded from the study area during 2010-2012 with a dominance of Araneid, Salticid and Lycosid spiders. Key words: Spider diversity, Western Ghats INTRODUCTION Spiders comprise one of the largest (5-6th) orders of animals. The spider fauna of India has never been studied in its entirety despite of contributions by many arachnologists since Stoliczka (1869). The pioneering contribution on the taxonomy of Indian spiders is that of European arachnologist Stoliczka (1869). Review of available literature reveals that the earliest contribution by Blackwall (1867); Karsch (1873); Simon (1887); Thorell (1895) and Pocock (1900) were the pioneer workers of Indian spiders. They described many species from India. Tikader (1980, 1982), Tikader, and Malhotra (1980a,b) described spiders from India. Tikader (1980) compiled a book on Thomisid spiders of India, comprising two subfamilies, 25 genera and 115 species. Of these, 23 species were new to science. Descriptions, illustrations and distributions of all species were given. Keys to the subfamilies, genera, and species were provided. Tikader and Biswas (1981) studied 15 families, 47 genera and 99 species from Calcutta and surrounding areas with illustrations and descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnologische Arachnology
    Arachnologische Gesellschaft E u Arachnology 2015 o 24.-28.8.2015 Brno, p Czech Republic e www.european-arachnology.org a n Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters Heft / Volume 51 Karlsruhe, April 2016 ISSN 1018-4171 (Druck), 2199-7233 (Online) www.AraGes.de/aramit Arachnologische Mitteilungen veröffentlichen Arbeiten zur Faunistik, Ökologie und Taxonomie von Spinnentieren (außer Acari). Publi- ziert werden Artikel in Deutsch oder Englisch nach Begutachtung, online und gedruckt. Mitgliedschaft in der Arachnologischen Gesellschaft beinhaltet den Bezug der Hefte. Autoren zahlen keine Druckgebühren. Inhalte werden unter der freien internationalen Lizenz Creative Commons 4.0 veröffentlicht. Arachnology Logo: P. Jäger, K. Rehbinder Letters Publiziert von / Published by is a peer-reviewed, open-access, online and print, rapidly produced journal focusing on faunistics, ecology Arachnologische and taxonomy of Arachnida (excl. Acari). German and English manuscripts are equally welcome. Members Gesellschaft e.V. of Arachnologische Gesellschaft receive the printed issues. There are no page charges. URL: http://www.AraGes.de Arachnology Letters is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Autorenhinweise / Author guidelines www.AraGes.de/aramit/ Schriftleitung / Editors Theo Blick, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/M. and Callistus, Gemeinschaft für Zoologische & Ökologische Untersuchungen, D-95503 Hummeltal; E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sascha
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Revision of Hoggicosa Roewer, 1960, the Australian 'Bicolor' Group of Wolf Spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)Zoj 545 83
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 158, 83–123. With 25 figures Systematic revision of Hoggicosa Roewer, 1960, the Australian ‘bicolor’ group of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)zoj_545 83..123 PETER R. LANGLANDS1* and VOLKER W. FRAMENAU1,2 1School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia 2Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA, 6986, Australia Received 16 September 2008; accepted for publication 3 November 2008 The Australian wolf spider genus Hoggicosa Roewer, 1960 with the type species Hoggicosa errans (Hogg, 1905) is revised to include ten species: Hoggicosa alfi sp. nov.; Hoggicosa castanea (Hogg, 1905) comb. nov. (= Lycosa errans Hogg, 1905 syn. nov.; = Lycosa perinflata Pulleine, 1922 syn. nov.; = Lycosa skeeti Pulleine, 1922 syn. nov.); Hoggicosa bicolor (McKay, 1973) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa brennani sp. nov.; Hoggicosa duracki (McKay, 1975) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa forresti (McKay, 1973) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa natashae sp. nov.; Hoggicosa snelli (McKay, 1975) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa storri (McKay, 1973) comb. nov.; and Hoggicosa wolodymyri sp. nov. The Namibian Hoggicosa exigua Roewer, 1960 is transferred to Hogna, Hogna exigua (Roewer, 1960) comb. nov. A phylogenetic analysis including nine Hoggicosa species, 11 lycosine species from Australia and four from overseas, with Arctosa cinerea Fabricius, 1777 as outgroup, supported the monophyly of Hoggicosa, with a larger distance between the epigynum anterior pockets compared to the width of the posterior transverse part. The analysis found that an unusual sexual dimorphism for wolf spiders (females more colourful than males), evident in four species of Hoggicosa, has evolved multiple times. Hoggicosa are burrowing lycosids, several constructing doors from sand or debris, and are predominantly found in semi-arid to arid regions of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Wsn 47(2) (2016) 298-317 Eissn 2392-2192
    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 47(2) (2016) 298-317 EISSN 2392-2192 Indian Lycosoidea Sundevall (Araneae: Opisthothelae: Araneomorphae) in Different States and Union Territories Including an Annotated Checklist Dhruba Chandra Dhali1,*, P. M. Sureshan1, Kailash Chandra2 1Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Kozkhikore - 673006, India 2Zoological Survey of India, M- Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053, India *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Annotated checklist of Lycosoidea so far recorded from different states and union territories of India reveals a total of 251 species under 38 genera belonging five families. The review cleared that diversity of lycosoid spider fauna is maximum in West Bengal followed by Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and they are not distributed maximally in the states and union territories within Biodiversity hotspots. This fauna is distributed all over the country. There is nearly 69.35% endemism (in context of India). Keywords: Distribution; Lycosoidea; India; State; Union Territories; Annotated; checklist 1. INTRODUCTION Spiders, composing the order Araneae Clerck, 1757 is the largest group among arachnids and separated into two suborders: Mesothelae Pocock, 1892 (segmented spiders) World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 and Opisthothelae Pocock, 1892 (includes all other spiders). Later one is further divided into two infraorders: Mygalomorphae Pocock, 1892 (ancient' spiders) and Araneomorphae Smith, 1902 (modern' spiders include the vast majority of spiders) (Coddington, 2005; WSC, 2015). Araneomorphae composed of 99 families and most of them can be divided into at least six clades and 11 super-families, though some are still unplaced in that system (Zhang, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Wolf Spider Genus Diapontia Keyserling, and the Relationships of the Subfamily Sosippinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) 387-415 75 (3): 387– 415 20.12.2017
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2017 Band/Volume: 75 Autor(en)/Author(s): Piacentini Luis Norberto, Scioscia Cristina Luisa, Carbajal Mirta Noemi, Ott Ricardo, Brescovit Antonio Domingos, Ramirez Martin J. Artikel/Article: A revision of the wolf spider genus Diapontia Keyserling, and the relationships of the subfamily Sosippinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) 387-415 75 (3): 387– 415 20.12.2017 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2017. A revision of the wolf spider genus Diapontia Keyserling, and the relationships of the subfamily Sosippinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) Luis Norberto Piacentini *, 1, Cristina Luisa Scioscia 1, Mirta Noemí Carbajal 2, Ricardo Ott 3, Antonio Domingo Brescovit 4 & Martín Javier Ramírez 1 1 División Aracnología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” – CONICET, Av. Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina; Luis Norberto Piacentini [[email protected]]; Cristina Luisa Scioscia [[email protected]]; Martín Javier Ramírez [[email protected]] — 2 Fundación Inalafquen. H. Yrigoyen 792. 8520 San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina; Mirta Noemí Carbajal [[email protected]] — 3 Museu de Ciências Naturais, Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Dr. Salvador França, 1427, 90690- 000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Ricardo Ott [[email protected]] — 4 Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, CEP 05503-900; Antonio Brescovit [[email protected]] — *Corresponding author Accepted 21.vi.2017. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 11.xii.2017. Editors in charge: Lorenzo Prendini & Klaus-Dieter Klass Abstract The South American genus Diapontia is revised to include nine species: Diapontia uruguayensis Keyserling, 1877 ( = Diapontia senescens Mello-Leitão, 1944 syn.n.; D.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from India-2012
    © Indian Society of Arachnology ISSN 2278 - 1587(Online) CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) FROM INDIA-2012 Keswani, S.; P. Hadole and A. Rajoria* SGB Amravati University, Amravati-444602 [email protected]; [email protected] *Indraprastha University, Delhi; [email protected] ABSTRACT Spiders comprise one of the largest (5-6th) orders of animals. The spider fauna of India has never been studied in its entirety despite of contributions by many arachnologists since Stoliczka (1869). In the present paper, we provide an updated checklist of spiders from India based on published records and on the collections of the Arachnology Museum, SGB Amravati University. A total of 1686 species of spiders are now recorded from India. They belong to two infraorders, Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae, 60 families and 438 genera. The list also includes 70 species from Karakorum. The spider diversity in India is dominated by Saltisids followed by Thomisids and then Araneids, Gnaphosids and Lycosids. Key words: India, Araneae, spider fauna, checklist. INTRODUCTION The pioneering contribution on the taxonomy of Indian spiders is that of European arachnologist Stoliczka (1869). Review of available literature reveals that the earliest contribution by Blackwall (1867); Karsch (1873); Simon (1887); Thorell (1895) and Pocock (1900) were the pioneer workers of Indian spiders. They described many species from India. Tikader (1980, 1982), Tikader, and Malhotra (1980) described spiders from India. Tikader (1980) compiled a book on Thomisid spiders of India, comprising two subfamilies, 25 genera and 115 species. Of these, 23 species were new to science. Descriptions, illustrations and distributions of all species were given. Keys to the subfamilies, genera, and species were provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Australian Museum Foundation 49
    the western australian museum [ANNUAL REPORT 2007] the western australian museum [ 1 ] annual report 2 0 0 7 < back to contents> ABOUT THIS REPORT This Annual Report is available in PDF format on The Western Australian Museum website www.museum.wa.gov.au Copies are available on request in alternate formats. Copies are archived in the State Library of Western Australia, the National Library Canberra and in The Western Australian Museum Library located at the Collection and Research Centre, Welshpool. For enquiries, comments, or more information about staff or projects mentioned in this report, please visit The Western Australian Museum website or contact the Museum at the address below. Telephone 9212 3700. PUBLISHED BY THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986 49 Kew Streeet, Welshpool, Western Australia 6106 www.museum.wa.gov.au ISSNISSN 0083-8721 2204-6127 the western australian museum [ 2 ] annual report 2 0 0 7 the western australian museum [ 3 ] annual report 2 0 0 7 < back to contents> [ CONTENTS ] LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL �����������������������������������������������4 DisClosures and LEGal ComplianCE ...............51 MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER ��������������������������������������5 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS..............................................53 THE YEAR IN REVIEW ������������������������������������������������������6 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS................................77 – ChIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ADVERTISING................................................................83 DISABILITY
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Manual for Wolf Spiders
    HUSBANDRY MANUAL FOR Image 1 Wolf Spider (Provided by http://www.richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper/Nature/Spiders/index.html) WOLF SPIDERS With specific reference to Lycosa godeffroyi Class: Arachnida Order: Lycosidae Complier: Amber Gane Date of Preparation: Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Course name and number: Lecturer: Jacki Salkeld, Brad Walker, David Crass and Graeme Phipps. DISCLAIMER These husbandry guidelines were produced by the compiler/author at TAFE NSW – Western Sydney Institute, Richmond College, N.S.W. Australia as part assessment for completion of Certificate III in Captive Animals, Course number 1068, RUV30204. Since the husbandry guidelines are the result of student project work, care should be taken in the interpretation of information therein, - in effect, all care taken but no responsibility is assumed for any loss or damage that may result from the use of these guidelines. It is offered to the ASZK Husbandry Manuals Register for the benefit of animal welfare and care. Husbandry guidelines are utility documents and are ‘works in progress’, so enhancements to these guidelines are invited. 2 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY Every species of spider in the world contains venom in their poison glands, but few react with humans causing a reaction (sometimes deadly). These few spiders are classified by us as ‘Venomous’. All Wolf Spider species are generally classified as venomous to humans, though not lethal. Individual reactions tend towards the subjective, depending upon allergies, the amount of injected venom, size and species of wolf spider, age and health of victim. This generally non-aggressive spider will only initiate a strike if provoked.
    [Show full text]
  • During the Opening Ceremony of the 29Th European Congress Of
    Arachnologische Mitteilungen 51: iv-xi Karlsruhe, April 2016 Nachruf /Obituary In memoriam Prof. RNDr. Jan Buchar, DrSc. (1932–2015) During the opening ceremony of the 29th European congress of Arachnology held in Brno last year, Professor Jan Buchar recieved an enormous, long-lasting applause for his speech. It was his farewell address. Jan Buchar passed away on 17th November 2015. He was a kind of “celebrity” of Czech as well as world arachnology. He was an important zoologist, the leading personality who notably influenced progress of arachnology from the 1960’s to the present days. Czech arachnologists called him “our Spider Father“, and this nickname summarizes it all. Jan Buchar was the founding father of large Czech arachnological school. He shared more than just his knowledge with several generations of Czech arachnologists; he shared his generous personality and much of his spare time. Jan Buchar (Fig. 1) was born on 18th February 1932 in Bystrá nad Jizerou – a small village surrounded by beautiful nature in the foothills of the Krkonoše Mts. All his family admired nature – so it was not surprising that nature became Jan Buchar’s job, mission and destiny. The career of a univer- sity professor was perhaps predestined for him. After finishing secondary school in Jilemnice, Jan Buchar began studies at the Faculty of Science of the Charles Uni- versity in Prague (1951–1955) and thus started his life-long relationship with the Faculty. He was studying and teaching there, doing research and leading the Department of Zoology (1986–1990) and later the section of Invertebrates (1990– 1995).
    [Show full text]