2016 Park System Development Charge 20-Year Capital Plan (Summary)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report on the Amended and Restated Interstate Corridor Urban Renewal Plan 2021
Exhibit B Page 1 of 30 REPORT ON THE AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERSTATE CORRIDOR URBAN RENEWAL PLAN 2021 Prepared by Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC in conjunction with the Prosper Portland and the Portland Office of Management and Finance Exhibit B Page 2 of 30 Exhibit B Page 3 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 II. A DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN URBAN RENEWAL AREA ............................................................................................................................... 5 A. Physical Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 6 B. Social, Economic, and Housing Conditions ................................................................................. 14 III. EXPECTED IMPACT, INCLUDING FISCAL IMPACT OF THE PLAN IN LIGHT OF ADDED SERVICES OR INCREASED POPULATION .................................................................................. 18 IV. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN .................. 19 V. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EACH PROJECT ACTIVITY TO BE UNDERTAKEN UNDER THE PLAN AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................. 19 A. Rehabilitation, Development, and Redevelopment Assistance .............................................. 19 B. Housing ........................................................................................................................................... -
Portland Parks and Recreation
Portland Parks and Recreation CBO has posted the online, interactive version of the bureau’s performance dashboard here: http://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/article/523266 The following questions were asked during the bureau’s budget work session. Responses are included in the attached packet. 1. Please provide a breakdown of scholarships by community center. 2. What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? 3. Did the increase in the value of scholarships granted correspond to the number or participants in the program? Was there an increase in workload or did the cost of the programs go up? 4. List/plans of the following: Five-year major maintenance queue Five-year SDC funded projects Prior five-year SDC fund projects 5. Please provide descriptions and budget amounts for the two new requests: (1) parks rangers expansion and (2) tree code implementation PP&R Council Budget Questions – Follow up from March 17th Budget presentation: 1) Breakdown of scholarships by community center See Attached Scholarship PDF File 2) What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? Rather than close whole facilities or parks when there is inadequate major maintenance funding we reduce levels of service (thin the soup) across the system and we also delay repairs and replacements, thus allowing the risk of failure to increase. Examples are the sewer back up at Sellwood, the sewer failure at Buckman Field House, the emergency culvert failures, etc. The one counter example that resulted a full closure and demolition was the wood play structure at Couch Park. -
District Background
DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%). -
Citizens Advisory Committee Announces Recommendations for Locations of Future Skateparks
NEWS RELEASE CONTACT May 19, 2005 Bryan Aptekar Community Relations Portland Parks & Recreation (503) 823-5594 Citizens Advisory Committee Announces Recommendations for Locations of Future Skateparks Citizens Advisory Committee Recommends 19 Sites Throughout Portland Glenhaven Park Recommended as Site for Next City Skatepark After 18 months, more than two dozen public meetings, and a series of site visits, the SkatePark Leadership Advisory Team (SPLAT) has made its recommendations to Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) for a system of 19 skatepark sites to be developed in the City of Portland. Two of the skateparks will be developed within the next three years, and the rest to follow, as funding permits. SPLAT is a citizens advisory group that was convened in 2003. At their final meeting on May 10th they completed 18 months of work to meet the need for safe, legal recreational opportunities for the city’s estimated 30,000+ skateboarders, freestyle BMX bike riders and other action sport enthusiasts. Advisory Committee Creates Vision for “System of Skateparks” The recommended sites reflect the SPLAT’s vision for a system of skateparks consisting of one regional, several district, and many small neighborhood skatespots. The regional park will be more than 25,000 square feet (sf) in size and would be sited in a non- residential area. The district parks will be at least 10,000 sf (smaller than two tennis courts) and would potentially be covered and lit for extended hours use. The smaller neighborhood skatespots will be typically less than 8,000 sf (the size of one tennis court) and would serve a more limited number of users. -
The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007
The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007 A Community Questionnaire was included in the initial project newsletter, which was mailed to over 4,000 addresses in the vicinity of the park site (virtually the entire neighborhood) as well as other interested parties. The newsletter was made available for pick-up at Chapman School and Friendly House and made available electronically as well. A total of 148 questionnaires were submitted, either by mail or on the web, by the April 20 deadline. The following summarizes the results. 1. The original framework plan for the River District Parks suggested three common elements that would link the parks together. Which do you feel should be included in The Fields neighborhood park? 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Boardwalk Pedestrian Gallery Aquifer 2. This park is envisioned as a “neighborhood park no answ er – over two square blocks providing more traditional spaces for neighborhood residents. Do you agree ? with this overall concept? no yes Comments Regarding Question #2 “Traditional Neighborhood Park” #1 - None (of the original “framework concepts” are important What to you mean by "traditional" As long as this park does not become filthy (ie. bad terrain, homeless) like the waterfront, I'm for it. Excellent idea. A traditional park will be a nice complement to the other two parks. I don't know if my selections were recorded above. A continuation of the boardwalk is essential to making the connection between and among the parks. The design of the buildings around the park has narrowed the feeling of openness so it is beginning to look like a private park for the residential buildings surrounding it. -
Make a Plan to VOTE! Two Ways to Return Your Ballot: 1
Make a Plan to VOTE! Two ways to return your ballot: 1. Vote early & return your ballot by mail. Get it in the mail by Tue., Oct. 27. No stamp needed! 2. Return to any Official Ballot Drop Site in Oregon by 8 PM Nov 3, 2020. Multnomah County Voters’ Pamphlet November 3, 2020 General Election Dear Multnomah County Voter: This Voters’ Pamphlet for the Nov. 3, 2020 General Election is being mailed to all residential households in Multnomah County. Due to the size of both the State and County Voters’ Pamphlet the pamphlets are being mailed separately. If you don’t have your State Voters’ Pamphlet yet, look for it in the mail soon. In advance of the election we are asking voters to Make a Plan to VOTE! Here is what you can do to be ready for the election and ensure your vote is counted: 1. Register to VOTE. Update your voter registration information or register to vote at oregonvotes.gov/myvote. The Voter Registration Deadline is Oct. 13. Sign up to Track Your Ballot at multco.us/trackyourballot. 2. Get your ballot. You will receive your ballot in the mail beginning Oct. 14. If you have not received your ballot by Oct. 22, take action and contact the elections office. 3. VOTE your ballot. Remember to sign your ballot return envelope. Your signature is your identification. If you forget to sign or your signature does not match we will contact you so you can take action and we can count your vote. 4. Return your ballot. -
LWCF Projects 1964 to 2019
FiscalYear CountyName AgencyName ProjectNumber ProjectName ProjectScope GrantAmount ProjectAddress ProjectCity ProjectZipCod Latitude Longitude e 2018/19 Kern City of Bakersfield 06-01827 Kaiser Permanente Construct 4 new football fields, a restroom and concession $3,000,000 9001 Ashe Road Bakersfield 93313 NULL NULL Sports Village stand, exercise outdoor gym area, 3 parking lots, Project installation of sports field lighting, and landscaping at the Kaiser Permanente Sports Village in the City of Bakersfield. 2018/19 Humboldt City of Eureka 06-01826 Sequoia Park Construct new trails, playground facilities, off-street ADA $1,525,000 3414 W Street Eureka 95503 NULL NULL Redwood Canopy compliant parking and new restrooms and renovate trails Walk and Trail in Sequoia Park in the City of Eureka. Project 2018/19 Riverside City of Indio 06-0130 South Jackson Park Construct a new approximately 0.5 mile trail with exercise $652,500 83100 Date Indio 92201 NULL NULL Accessibility stations and plant approximately 50 new trees, renovate Avenue Improvements existing playgrounds and provide ADA improvements at South Jackson Park in the City of Indio. 2018/19 Los Angeles City of Long Beach 06-01828 Davenport Park Construct a new multi-use sports field, shaded outdoor $2,016,000 2910 East 55th Long Beach 90805 NULL NULL Phase II seating area, and install exercise equipment with signage Way in Davenport Park in the City of Long Beach. 2018/19 Madera County of Madera 06-01829 Courthouse Park Construct a new playground, exercise stations, and picnic $203,747 210 W. Yosemite Madera 93637 NULL NULL Project area at Courthouse Park in the City of Madera. -
A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore
A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment In November 2002, Portland voters approved a five-year Parks Levy to begin in July 2003. Levy dollars restored budget cuts made in FY 2002-03 as well as major services and improvements outlined in the Parks 2020 Vision plan adopted by City Council in July 2001. In order to fulfill our obligation to the voters, we identified four key objectives. This report highlights what we have accomplished to date. Objective 1: Restore $2.2 million in cuts made in 2002/03 budget The 2003 Parks Levy restored cuts that were made to balance the FY 2002-03 General Fund budget. These cuts included the closure of some recreational facilities, the discontinuation and reduction of some community partnerships that provide recreational opportunities for youth, and reductions in maintenance of parks and facilities. Below is a detailed list of services restored through levy dollars. A. Restore programming at six community schools. SUN Community Schools support healthy social and cross-cultural development of all participants, teach and model values of respect and inclusion of all people, and help reduce social disparities and inequities. Currently, over 50% of students enrolled in the program are children of color. 2003/04 projects/services 2004/05 projects/services Proposed projects/services 2005/06 Hired and trained full-time Site Coordinators Total attendance at new sites (Summer Continue to develop programming to serve for 6 new PP&R SUN Community Schools: 2004-Spring 2005): 85,159 the needs of each school’s community and Arleta, Beaumont, Centennial, Clarendon, increase participation in these programs. -
Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings
View this email in your browser Share this URBAN FORESTRY January 2016 Get Involved! | Resources | Tree Permits | Tree Problems | Home In This Issue Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings, Urban Forestry in the Schoolyard Hiring Youth Conservation Crew (YCC) Summer Crew Leader, Apply by Thursday, March 3, 2016 Upcoming Urban Forestry Workshops, Free and Open to the Public Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry You may have recently heard about the upcoming 5% budget cuts proposed for Parks programs. Among the difficult reductions proposed, Urban Forestry could be effected by elimination of the $185,000 Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Treatment program. The City of Portland has minimized the spread of DED and avoided the decimation of the American elm (Ulmus americana) with a successful elm monitoring and treatment program. Without advanced warning, rapid detection and removal, the American elm could ultimately vanish from our landscape. Eastmoreland, Ladd’s Addition, the South Park blocks, Lents Park, Laurelhurst Park, and Overlook Park are areas where elms play a significant role in neighborhood identity. "Many communities have been able to maintain a healthy population of mature elms through a vigilant program of identification and removal of diseased elms and systematic pruning of weakened, dying or dead branches" -Linda Haugen, Plant Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Eliminating this program will also require adjacent property owners to cover the cost of removing DED- infected street trees themselves. The cut will also reduce citywide 24/7 emergency response to clear roads of trees which have fallen during storms, and reduce regular maintenance of publicly-owned trees- additional activities performed by some of the same staff . -
PP&R's FY 2021-22 Requested Budget
Requested Budget FY 2021-22 Portland Parks & Recreation PP&R Staff FY 2021-22 Requested Budget Maximo Behrens, Recreation Services Manager Tonya Booker, Land Stewardship Manager Carmen Rubio, Commissioner-in-charge Jenn Cairo, Urban Forestry Manager Tim Collier, Public Information Manager Adena Long, Director Margaret Evans, Workforce Development Manager Todd Lofgren, Deputy Director Vicente Harrison, Security and Emergency Manager Lauren McGuire, Assets and Development Manager Claudio Campuzano, Manager Kenya Williams, Equity and Inclusion Manager Finance, Property, & Technology Department Kerry Anderson Andre Ashley Don Athey Darryl Brooks Budget Advisory Committee Tamara Burkovskaia Krystin Castro Board Members Riley Clark-Long Paul Agrimis Mara Cogswell Mike Elliott Dale Cook Jenny Glass Terri Davis Juan Piantino Leah Espinoza Paddy Tillett Rachel Felice Bonnie Gee Yosick Joan Hallquist Erin Zollenkopf Erik Harrison Britta Herwig Labor Partners Brett Horner Sadie Atwell, Laborers Local 483 Don Joughin Luis Flores, PCL Brian Landoe Yoko Silk, PTE-17 Robin Laughlin Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Community Representatives Todd Melton Pauline Miranda Jeremy Robbins, Portland Accessibility Advisory Council Soo Pak Andre Middleton, Friends of Noise Dylan Paul Chris Rempel, Native American Community Advisory Council Nancy Roth JR Lilly, East Portland Action Plan Victor Sanders Joe McFerrin, Portland Opportunities Industrialization Center Jamie Sandness Brian Flores Garcia, Youth Durelle Singleton Sabrina Wilson, Rosewood Initiative Chris Silkie Jenny -
BEECN Guidelines and Code of Conduct
Basic Earthquake Emergency Communications Node (BEECN) Guidelines (first edition) Published: April 2019 Photo credits: Ernest Jones and Jeremy Van Keuren Graphics and layout: Jeremy Van Keuren Contents SECTION 000 - PROGRAM ORGANIZATION. .4 100.35 BEECN Cohort Coordinators ..................10 000.05 Section Numbers .............................4 100.40 BEECN Cohort Responsibilities ...............10 000.15 City Employees and BEECNs ...................5 100.45 Fire Station Cohorts. .11 000.20 Elements of a BEECN ..........................5 100.50 BEECN Volunteers and NETs ..................11 000.30 Location of BEECN Sites .......................6 100.55 Indemnification ..............................11 SECTION 100 - BEECN VOLUNTEERS ..............7 SECTION 200 - EQUIPMENT CACHES. .12 100.05 Role of BEECN Volunteers .....................7 200.05 Equipment Caches - General .................12 100.10 Persons with Disabilities ......................7 200.10 Equipment Caches - Placement ...............12 100.15 Volunteer Qualifications. 7 200.15 Supplementary Equipment in BEECN Caches .13 100.20 Relevant Volunteer Experience ................8 200.20 BEECN Cache Inventory ......................13 100.25 BEECN Training ...............................8 Troubleshooting the cache lid. 15 100.30 BEECN Volunteer Cohorts .....................9 BEECN radio frequencies ............................21 Page last updated: December 14, 2019 1:35 PM Page 1 of 58 SECTION 300 - OPERATIONS: BEECN SITES .......30 SECTION 400 - OPERATIONS: FIRE STATIONS. .38 300.05 -
2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide