DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Ohio Rail Plan January 2019 I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of Ohio Rail Plan January 2019 I State of Ohio Rail Plan January 2019 i Contents 3.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 3-1 Executive Summary ......................................................................... I 3.2 PAST STUDIES .................................................................................. 3-1 1. Role of Rail in Statewide Transportation ............................... 1-1 3.2.1 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Service ................................ 3-1 3.2.2 Ohio Hub Study ................................................................ 3-3 1.1 PURPOSE AND INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1-1 3.2.3 Midwest Regional Rail Initiative (MWRRI) .......................... 3-3 1.2 OHIO’S GOALS FOR THE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM .. 1-2 3.3 MIDWEST REGIONAL RAIL PLANNING STUDY .................................... 3-4 1.3 ROLE OF RAIL IN OHIO’S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ........................ 1-2 3.3.1 Corridors .......................................................................... 3-5 1.4 INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE OF RAIL PROGRAMS IN 3.4 LOCALLY SPONSORED RAIL PLANNING EFFORTS ............................... 3-6 OHIO .............................................................................................. 1-5 3.4.1 Northern Indiana/Ohio Passenger Rail Initiative ................ 3-6 1.4.1 Ohio Rail Development Commission ................................. 1-5 3.4.2 Rapid-Speed Transportation Initiative ............................... 3-7 1.4.2 Public Utilities Commission of Ohio................................... 1-5 3.4.3 Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study ............................ 3-8 1.4.3 Other State Agencies ........................................................ 1-6 3.4.4 Toledo – Detroit Passenger Rail Feasibility ......................... 3-8 1.4.4 Metropolitan Planning Organizations ................................ 1-6 3.5 STATION IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................... 3-8 1.4.5 Regional Transportation Planning Organizations ............... 1-8 1.4.6 Port Authorities ............................................................... 1-8 4. Freight Rail Issues and Opportunities, Proposed 1.5 STATE’S AUTHORITY ...................................................................... 1-10 Improvements .......................................................................4-1 1.6 FREIGHT AND PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES, INITIATIVES AND PLANS 1-10 4.1 OHIO’S CHANGING INDUSTRIAL BASE............................................... 4-1 2. Ohio’s Existing Rail System .................................................... 2-1 4.1.1 Ohio’s Changing Steel Industry .......................................... 4-1 2.1 DESCRIPTION AND INVENTORY ........................................................ 2-1 4.1.2 Ohio’s Petrochemical Opportunities .................................. 4-2 2.1.1 Existing Rail Lines ............................................................. 2-1 4.1.3 Addressing Changes in Coal Markets ................................. 4-4 2.1.2 Existing Multimodal Freight Rail Network ....................... 2-13 4.2 IMPORTANCE OF RAIL TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN OHIO ......... 4-5 2.1.3 Passenger Rail Services in Ohio ....................................... 2-16 4.3 SENSITIVITY OF OHIO SHIPPERS TO RAIL RATES AND SERVICE ........... 4-6 2.1.4 Public Funding and Financing.......................................... 2-23 4.4 OHIO’S STATUS AS AN INTERMODAL HUB AND CHANGES TO THE 2.1.5 Federal Financing Programs ............................................ 2-27 INTERMODAL NETWORK .................................................................. 4-7 2.1.6 Safety Improvements ..................................................... 2-28 4.4.1 Heartland Corridor and National Gateway Corridor ........... 4-7 2.1.7 Rail’s Economic and Environmental Impacts.................... 2-32 4.4.2 Jeffersonville Intermodal Facility ....................................... 4-8 2.2 TRENDS AND FORECASTS .............................................................. 2-35 4.5 DEMAND FOR ADDITIONAL RAIL ACCESS AND CONNECTIVITY ........... 4-9 2.2.1 Demographic and Economic Growth Factors ................... 2-35 4.5.1 Access .............................................................................. 4-9 2.2.2 Freight Demand and Growth .......................................... 2-41 4.5.2 Connectivity ................................................................... 4-10 2.2.3 Passenger Travel Demand and Growth ........................... 2-49 4.6 CHALLENGES TO OHIO’S LOCAL RAILROADS ................................... 4-10 2.2.4 Fuel Cost Trends............................................................. 2-50 4.7 CONTINUED EFFORTS TO REDUCE MODAL CONFLICTS .................... 4-11 2.2.5 Rail Congestion Trends ................................................... 2-51 4.7.1 Highway/Rail Crossing Safety Issues ................................ 4-11 2.2.6 Highway and Airport Congestion Trends ......................... 2-51 4.7.2 Blocked Crossings ........................................................... 4-12 2.2.7 Land Use Trends............................................................. 2-54 4.7.3 Other Crossing Issues ...................................................... 4-13 4.7.4 Movable Rail Bridges ...................................................... 4-13 3. Proposed Passenger Rail Improvements and 4.7.5 Non-Compatible Railroad Assets ..................................... 4-13 Investments ........................................................................... 3-1 STATE OF OHIO RAIL PLAN ii Contents 5. Rail Service and Investment Program .................................... 5-1 Table 1-3. Amtrak Routes in Ohio ............................................................ 1-4 5.1 VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES .................................................... 5-1 Table 1-4. Percentage of Ohio Population within 10 and 30 Mile 5.1.1 Vision Statement .............................................................. 5-1 Radius of Amtrak Station ......................................................... 1-4 5.1.2 Mission ............................................................................ 5-1 Table 1-5. List of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in Ohio ................. 1-7 5.1.3 Goals and Objectives ........................................................ 5-1 Table 1-6. Port Authorities ...................................................................... 1-9 5.2 PROGRAM COORDINATION ............................................................. 5-2 Table 2-1. Miles Operated by Type of Freight Railroad ............................. 2-2 5.3 RAIL AGENCIES ................................................................................ 5-2 Table 2-2. Class I Rail Mileage in Ohio ...................................................... 2-2 5.4 PROGRAM EFFECTS ......................................................................... 5-3 Table 2-3. Local Railroad Mileage in Ohio ................................................. 2-5 5.5 FREIGHT AND PASSENGER ELEMENT................................................ 5-3 Table 2-4. Abandonments/Interim Trail Use (July 2008 – August 5.6 RAIL STUDIES AND REPORTS ............................................................ 5-6 2018) .....................................................................................2-13 6. Coordination and Review ...................................................... 6-1 Table 2-5. List of Intermodal Terminals in Ohio .......................................2-14 6.1 APPROACH TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION ....................... 6-1 Table 2-6. Intercity Passenger Rail Stations in Ohio .................................2-18 6.1.1 Approach to Stakeholder Participation.............................. 6-1 Table 2-7. PRIIA Section 207 Amtrak Performance Metrics for 6.1.2 Approach to General Public Participation .......................... 6-2 Quarter Ending September 2017 ............................................2-21 6.2 COORDINATION WITH NEIGHBORING STATES .................................. 6-2 Table 2-8. Economic Contribution of Rail Transportation Industry ...........2-32 6.3 ISSUES RAISED ................................................................................ 6-3 Table 2-9. Economic Contributions of Rail in Ohio ...................................2-33 6.3.1 Rail Corridor Preservation, Reactivation, Rail Service Table 2-10. Top 10 Rail-Dependent Industry Sectors .................................2-33 Preservation .................................................................... 6-3 Table 2-11. Benefits to the U.S. of Ohio Shippers and Receivers Using 6.3.2 Industrial Access .............................................................. 6-3 Rail ........................................................................................2-34 6.3.3 Traffic Opportunities ........................................................ 6-4 Table 2-12. Ohio vs. United States Sector Location Quotient 6.3.4 Regulatory Issues ............................................................. 6-4 (April 2017) ............................................................................2-40 6.3.5 Rail Rate and Service Issues .............................................. 6-4 Table 2-13. Rail Tonnage by Direction 2016 ..............................................2-41 6.3.6 Funding...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RAIL OPERATORS' REPORTING MARKS February 24, 2010 a AA
    RAIL OPERATORS' REPORTING MARKS February 24, 2010 A AA ANN ARBOR AAM ASHTOLA AND ALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN AB ATLANTIC AND BIRMINGHAM RAILWAY ABA ATLANTA, BIRMINGHAM AND ATLANTIC ABB AKRON AND BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD ABC ATLANTA, BIRMINGHAM AND COAST ABL ALLEYTON AND BIG LAKE ABLC ABERNETHY-LOUGHEED LOGGING COMPANY ABMR ALBION MINES RAILWAY ABR ARCADIA AND BETSEY RIVER ABS ABILENE AND SOUTHERN ABSO ABBEVILLE SOUTHERN RAILWAY ABYP ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORP. AC ALGOMA CENTRAL ACAL ATLANTA AND CHARLOTTE AIR LINE ACC ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACE AMERICAN COAL ENTERPRISES ACHB ALGOMA CENTRAL AND HUDSON BAY ACL ATLANTIC COAST LINE ACLC ANGELINA COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY ACM ANACONDA COPPER MINING ACR ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD ACRR ASTORIA AND COLUMBIA RIVER ACRY AMES AND COLLEGE RAILWAY ACTY AUSTIN CITY RAILROAD ACY AKRON, CANTON AND YOUNGSTOWN ADIR ADIRONDACK RAILWAY ADPA ADDISON AND PENNSYLVANIA RAILWAY AE ALTON AND EASTERN AEC ATLANTIC AND EAST CAROLINA AER ANNAPOLIS AND ELK RIDGE RAILROAD AF AMERICAN FORK RAILROAD AG ATLANTIC AND GULF RAILROAD AGR ALDER GULCH RAILROAD AGP ARGENTINE AND GRAY'S PEAK AGS ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN AGW ATLANTIC AND GREAT WESTERN AHR ALASKA HOME RAILROAD AHUK AHUKINI TERMINAL RAILWAY AICO ASHLAND IRON COMPANY AJ ARTEMUS-JELLICO RAILROAD AK ALLEGHENY AND KINZUA RAILROAD AKC ALASKA CENTRAL AKN ALASKA NORTHERN AL ALMANOR ALBL ALAMEDA BELT LINE ALBP ALBERNI PACIFIC ALBR ALBION RIVER RAILROAD ALC ALLEN LUMBER COMPANY ALCR ALBION LUMBER COMPANY RAILROAD ALGC ALLEGHANY CENTRAL (MD) ALLC ALLEGANY CENTRAL (NY) ALM ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA
    [Show full text]
  • Issue of Play on October 4 & 5 at the "The 6 :,53"
    I the 'It, 980 6:53 OCTOBER !li AMTRAK... ... now serving BRYAN and LOVELAND ... returns to INDIA,NAPOLIS then turns em away Amtrak's LAKE SHORE LIMITED With appropriate "first trip" is now making regular stops inaugural festivities, Amtrak every day at BRYAN in north­ introduced daily operation of western Ohio. The westbound its new HOOSIER STATE on the train stops at 11:34am and 1st of October between IND­ the eastbound train stops at IANAPOLIS and CHICAGO. Sev­ 8:15pm. eral OARP members were on the Amtrak's SHENANDOAH inaugural trip, including Ray is now stopping daily at a Kline, Dave Marshall and Nick new station stop in suburban Noe. Complimentary champagne Cincinnati. The eastbound was served to all passengers SHENANDOAH stops at LOVELAND and Amtrak public affairs at 7:09pm and the westbound representatives passed out train stops at 8:15am. A m- Amtrak literature. One of trak began both new stops on the Amtrak reps was also pas­ Sunday, October 26th. Sev­ sing out OARP brochures! [We eral OARP members were on don't miss an opportunity!] hand at both stations as the Our members reported that the "first trains" rolled in. inaugural round trip was a OARP has supported both new good one, with on-time oper­ station stops and we are ation the whole way. Tracks glad they have finally come permit 70mph speeds much of about. Both communities are the way and the only rough supportive of their new Am­ track was noted near Chicago. trak service. How To Find Amtrak held another in its The Station Maps for both series of FAMILY DAYS with BRYAN qnd LOVELAND will be much equipment on public dis­ fopnd' inside this issue of play on October 4 & 5 at the "the 6 :,53".
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning Urban and Regional Planning January 2007 High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2 Allison deCerreno Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/urban_plan_pub Part of the Infrastructure Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Policy Commons, Real Estate Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Allison deCerreno and Shishir Mathur. "High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2" Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning (2007). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Urban and Regional Planning at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Report 06-03 MTI HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART 2 IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: Funded by U.S. Department of HIGH-SPEED RAIL Transportation and California Department PROJECTS IN THE UNITED of Transportation STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 Report 06-03 Mineta Transportation November Institute Created by 2006 Congress in 1991 MTI REPORT 06-03 HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 November 2006 Allison L.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Outlines of Railways in Southwestern Ontario
    UCRS Newsletter • July 1990 Toronto & Guelph Railway Note: The Toronto & Goderich Railway Company was estab- At the time of publication of this summary, Pat lished in 1848 to build from Toronto to Guelph, and on Scrimgeour was on the editorial staff of the Upper to Goderich, on Lake Huron. The Toronto & Guelph Canada Railway Society (UCRS) newsletter. This doc- was incorporated in 1851 to succeed the Toronto & ument is a most useful summary of the many pioneer Goderich with powers to build a line only as far as Guelph. lines that criss-crossed south-western Ontario in the th th The Toronto & Guelph was amalgamated with five 19 and early 20 centuries. other railway companies in 1854 to form the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada. The GTR opened the T&G line in 1856. 32 - Historical Outlines of Railways Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada in Southwestern Ontario The Grand Trunk was incorporated in 1852 with au- BY PAT SCRIMGEOUR thority to build a line from Montreal to Toronto, assum- ing the rights of the Montreal & Kingston Railway Company and the Kingston & Toronto Railway Com- The following items are brief histories of the railway pany, and with authority to unite small railway compa- companies in the area between Toronto and London. nies to build a main trunk line. To this end, the follow- Only the railways built in or connecting into the area ing companies were amalgamated with the GTR in are shown on the map below, and connecting lines in 1853 and 1854: the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Toronto, Hamilton; and London are not included.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Blue Ribbon Panel on Hyperloop
    Chairman Lt. Governor Mike Kehoe Vice Chairman Andrew G. Smith Panelists Jeff Aboussie Cathy Bennett Tom Blair Travis Brown Mun Choi Tom Dempsey Rob Dixon Warren Erdman Rep. Travis Fitzwater Michael X. Gallagher Rep. Derek Grier Chris Gutierrez Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge Mike Lally Mary Lamie Elizabeth Loboa Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer MISSOURI BLUE RIBBON Patrick McKenna Dan Mehan Joe Reagan Clint Robinson PANEL ON HYPERLOOP Sen. Caleb Rowden Greg Steinhoff Report prepared for The Honorable Elijah Haahr Tariq Taherbhai Leonard Toenjes Speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives Bill Turpin Austin Walker Ryan Weber Sen. Brian Williams Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A National Certification Track in Missouri .................................................................................................... 8 Track Specifications ................................................................................................................................. 10 SECTION 1: International Tube Transport Center of Excellence (ITTCE) ................................................... 12 Center Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 12 Research Areas ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives
    Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives Milwaukee-Twin Cities High-Speed Rail Corridor Program Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Quandel Consultants, LLC Version: October 26, 2011 Revised November 1, 2012 Alternatives Selection Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………...vi 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Alternatives Selection Report .................................................................................. 1‐1 1.2 Background of Midwest Regional Rail Initiative ........................................................................ 1‐1 1.3 Background of Milwaukee‐Twin Cities High‐Speed Rail Corridor Program ............................... 1‐4 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 1‐13 1.5 Route Alternatives Analysis ..................................................................................................... 1‐15 1.6 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................... 1‐16 1.7 Identification of Potential Passenger Rail Alternatives ............................................................ 1‐17 1.8 Technical Documentation .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study
    The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM & BUSINESS PLAN July 2007 Prepared for The Ohio Rail Development Commission Indiana Department of Transportation Michigan Department of Transportation New York Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Prepared by: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. In association with HNTB, Inc. The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail - Ohio Hub Study Technical Memorandum & Business Plan Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................x Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 System Planning and Feasibility Goals and Objectives................................................... 1-3 1.2 Business Planning Objectives.......................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Railroad Infrastructure Analysis...................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Passenger
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 172/Wednesday, September 5
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Notices 54655 identified and considered early in the determination, and its finding may be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Section 106 review process. rebutted by filings and evidence Jonathon Binet, (202) 245–0368. submitted into the record for this [Assistance for the hearing impaired is VII. Definitions proceeding. The Board will give careful available through the Federal If not specifically addressed below, consideration to any claims that the Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– terms used within this Program Transaction would have anticompetitive 800–877–8339.] Comment shall be defined consistent effects that are not apparent from the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GWI is a application itself. with the definitions provided in 36 CFR publicly traded, noncarrier holding part 800. DATES: The effective date of this company. RailAmerica is a publicly Common Bridge is, for purposes of decision is September 5, 2012. Any traded, noncarrier holding company. this Program Comment, a common post- person who wishes to participate in this See Appendix B for a complete list of 1945 bridge or culvert of a type proceeding as a party of record (POR) each company’s relevant holdings. identified in Section V. must file, no later than September 19, Program Comment is an alternative to 2012, a notice of intent to participate. Applicants state that, pursuant to an Section 106 review that allows a Federal All comments, protests, requests for agreement and plan of merger agency to request the ACHP to comment conditions, and any other evidence and (Agreement), Jaguar Acquisition Sub, on a category of undertakings in lieu of argument in opposition to the primary Inc., a newly formed, wholly owned conducting individual reviews under application and related filings, noncarrier subsidiary of GWI, would Sections 800.4 through 800.6 of the including filings by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • OHIO RAILROADS EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST Source – Ohio Rail Development Commission (ORDC) Revised: 12/6/2017
    OHIO RAILROADS EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST Source – Ohio Rail Development Commission (ORDC) Revised: 12/6/2017 Sample emergency notification sign. Look for the emergency phone number and crossing identification number at each crossing. HIGHLIGHTED NUMBERS – CLASS 1 REGIONAL OR LARGER SHORTLINE RAILROADS CODE RAILROAD NUMBER AA Ann Arbor Railroad (419) 726-3237 AB Akron Barberton Cluster Railway Company (330) 697-0857 ACJR Ashtabula, Caron & Jefferson Railroad (440) 576-1212 ASRY Ashland Railway, Dispatch (419) 522-0110 ATK Amtrak (800) 331-0008 BSS Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad (724) 589-4175 CCRA Camp Chase Railroad Company (888) 504-6599 CN Canadian National (800) 465-9239 CMQR Central Maine & Quebec Railway (866) 311-6851 CCRL Cleveland Commercial Railroad (800) 727-9252 CFE Chicago, Ft. Wayne (800) 979-4958 CIND Central Railroad of Indiana (800) 979-4958 CSX CSX Transportation (800) 232-0144 (Option 4) CTER Cincinnati East Terminal Railway (800) 979-4958 CUOH Columbus & Ohio River Railroad (800) 733-0026 CVSX Cuyahoga Valley Scenic Railroad (440) 546-5945 CWRO Cleveland Works Railway (216) 429-6572 FIR Flats Industrial Railroad Company (216) 696-7951 GTR Germantown Rail Siding Co. (The Dupps Co) (937) 855-6555 G&W Genesee & Wyoming Inc. (See Ohio Central Railroad) GTW CN North America/Grand Trunk Western Railroad (800) 465-9239 GRRW Grand River Railway (330) 718-3727 (412) 417-0733 HVSR Hocking Valley Scenic Railroad (740) 249-1452 1 CODE RAILROAD NUMBER IE Indiana Eastern Railroad (877) 788-0629 IN Indiana Northeastern Railway Company (517) 398-0005 (517) 278-4614 INOH Indiana & Ohio Railroad (800) 979-4958 IOCR Indiana & Ohio Central Railroad (800) 979-4958 IORY Indiana & Ohio Railway (800) 979-4958 MVRY Mahoning Valley Railway (800) 733-0026 ND&W Napoleon, Defiance & Western (479) 414 6563 MRTA Akron Metro RTA (330) 612-3016 (330) 957-0157 NSS Newburgh & South Shore Railroad (844) 564-8091 NOW Northern Ohio & Western Railway (844) 562-8091 NS Norfolk Southern Corporation (800) 453-2530 NTRY Republic N&T Railroad (330) 438-5466 OHCR Ohio Central Railroad, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 TLCI Planning Study Application
    Form Name: 2019 TLCI Planning Study Application Submission Time: October 12, 2018 11:38 am Browser: Chrome 69.0.3497.100 / Windows 7 IP Address: 198.30.186.2 Unique ID: 446136147 Location: 41.650199890137, -81.453300476074 Project Sponsor / Agency Name Village of Grand River Address 205 Singer Avenue Grand River, OH 44045 Contact Name Peter Zahirsky Title Director of Coastal Development (Lake County Ohio Port and Economic Development Authority) Office Phone Number (440) 357-2290 ext. 227 E-mail Address [email protected] Preference for TLCI planning study Either Will Work development Study Name Waterfront Entertainment District Revitalization Total Project Cost 80000 NOACA Funding Requested 80000 Local Funding Committed 0 NOACA may consider partial funding for My agency will not be able to implement the project if provided partial some projects. Please check the funding appropriate box below: Project Location (attach a location map Village of Grand River at the end of the application) Project Study Area (including Grand River's Waterfront Entertainment District, which is bounded on the geographic boundaries) east by River Street, on the north by Henry Street, on the west by Williams Street, and on the south by Olive Street. Detailed Project Description Grand River's Waterfront Entertainment District ("the District") is home to two Northeast Ohio seafood institutions: Pickle Bill's and Brennan's Fish House, but much of the surrounding area has deteriorated. There is also a railroad track that was reactivated in 2016 by a short line railroad, the Grand River Railway ("GRRY") to serve the Morton Salt mine that actually runs directly through the Pickle Bill's parking area, creating a dangerous situation for negative interaction between the train, parked cars, and patrons entering and exiting the restaurant.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report Riverside Dam Speed River, Preston
    CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT RIVERSIDE DAM SPEED RIVER, PRESTON CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO June 2012 Revised March 2013 Prepared for: AMEC Environment and Infrastructure Prepared by: CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT RIVERSIDE DAM SPEED RIVER, PRESTON CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO June 2012 Revised March 2013 Prepared for: AMEC Environment and Infrastructure 3215 North Service Road Burlington ON L7N 3G2 Prepared by: Unterman McPhail Associates Heritage Resource Management Consultants 540 Runnymede Road Toronto, ON M6S 2Z7 Tel: 416-766-7333 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Heritage Recognition 2 2.0 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 2 2.1 Development of Preston 2 2.2 Cambridge Mills and the Speed “Riverside” Dam 8 3.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION 15 3.1 Area Context 15 3.2 Site Description 16 4.0 BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE DESCRIPTION 18 4.1 Riverside Dam 18 5.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE EVALUATION 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 Evaluation 21 5.2.1 Design Value or Physical Value 22 5.2.2 Historical Value or Associative Value 22 5.2.3 Contextual Value 24 5.3 Summary of Cultural Heritage Value 25 5.3.1 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value 25 5.3.2 Description of Heritage Attributes 25 6.0 MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS 26 6.1 Introduction 26 6.2 Mitigation Recommendations 27 SOURCES APPENDIX A: Historical Maps, Aerial Views and Photographs APPENDIX B: Photographs, Context APPENDIX C: Photographs Riverside Dam LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. The circle marks the location of the Riverside Dam on the Speed River, City of Cambridge City of Cambridge, 2012, as adapted].
    [Show full text]