DOCSLIB.ORG

Death Valley June Beetle Project 1995

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Death Valley June Beetle Project 1995 DEATH VALLEY JUNE BEETLE PROJECT 1995 for NATIONAL BIOLOGICAL SURVEY and DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL PARK by -------------------~~~-~~~~~~~DA~Ud~R.~R{J££"Rl"b=======-------------------------------------------------------- MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD, OHIO TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 METHODS sampling strategy .......................................................................................... 5 genetic analysis ............................................................................................. 7 RESULTS genetic data................................................................................................... 8 sampling results ............................................................................................ 9 DISCUSSION taxonomic status .......................................................................................... 13 aistii5ution................................................................. ; ................................ 1'5~=~------------------------- biology ....................................................................................... ;................ 17 sexual attraction ........................................................................................... 21 predators ...................................................................................................... 22 threats .......................................................................................................... 22 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 25 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................... ~ ............................................................. 25 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................... ·... 26 INDEX TO TABLES, FIGURES, AND APPENDICES TABLE # PAGE 1. Collection sites for june beetle survey ........................................................ 38 2. Enzyme and buffer systems used for electrophoretic analysis of Polyphylla ............................................................................................... 44 3. Allele frequencies for P. anteronivea ........................................................ .45 4. Allele frequencies for P. erratica ....................... ~ ....................................... 45 5. Genetic variability at 14 loci for all populations of P. anteronivea and P. erratica (standard errors in parentheses) ................ .46 6. Matrix of genetic similarity and/or distance coefficients between P. anteronivea and P. erratica ................................................................... 4 7 7. Matrix of genetic similarity and/or distance coefficients for selected Polyphylla taxa.......... ,' ................................................................... 48 8. Estimated acreage for Polyphylla erratica ................................................. .49 1. Location of Death Valley National Park....................................................... 8 2. June beetle census locations along the Amargosa River drainage and the Saline and Eureka Valleys in Death Valley National Park.............. 29 3. Polyphylla erratica survey sites along the Amargosa River drainage .......... 30 4. Polyphylla anteronivea survey sites in Saline and Eureka Valleys .............. 31 5. Polyphylla anteronivea male ........................................................................ 32 6. Polyphylla erratica male and female ........................................................... 33 7. Saline Valley Dunes. (A) north side of lake with mesquite covered dunes; (B) west side of lake with creosote and open sand ........................... 34 FIGURE # PAGE 8. Alkali flats with Distichlis saltgrass (A) Ash Meadows; (B) Saratoga Springs ...................................................................................... 35 9. Female Polyphylla erratica in her burrow about eight inches below the soil surface ................................................................................... 36 10. Polyphylla erratica impaled on mesquite thorn by loggerhead shrike at Saratoga Springs ....................................................................................... 37 APPENDIX A Hardy, A.R., and F.G. Andrews. 1978. Studies in the Coleoptera of western sand dunes. 1. Five new Polyphylla Harris. Pan.-Pac. Ent. 54:1-8. B Young, R.M. 1988. A monograph of the genus Polyphylla Harris in America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae). BulL of the Nebraska State Mus. 11: 1-115. 1995 DEATH VALLEY JUNE BEETLE REPORT David Russell Department of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 ABSTRACT The beetle genus Polyphylla (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthini) is a taxonomically difficult group. This genus has had over 73 names proposed for the 28 currently recognized species north of Mexico. Five of these species are currently listed as Category 2 organisms-­ candidates for federal listing as threatened or endangered but for which insufficient information is known. The purposes of this study were: 1) to ascertain the taxonomic status of the Category 2 species Polyphylla anteronivea and P. erratica using data from allozyme electrophoresis; 2) to survey Death Valley National Park and adjacent areas to determine the present distribution of both taxa; 3) to study present populations in light of potential threats to their existence. A total of 144 sites were surveyed over three collecting periods between April 28 and June 29, 1995. Fourteen loci from 11 enzyme systems were examined using starch gel electrophoresis. Analysis of 38 P. anteronivea and 44 P. erratica revealed significantly different =~~=a;Hel~f=re<tuenG-ies===-at leur 1@6i-~with~ce.~ante1=oni"llea possessing three--_-----_------------___ _ unique alleles. Genetic distance estimates (Nei unbiase9 minimum distance = 0.17; Modified Roger's distance = 0.42) were calculated between the two species. The biological and genetic results of this study indicate that P. anteronivea and P. erratica represent valid species. The distributional survey showed these beetles to be restricted in range, although common in appropriate habitats. Habitat alterations, primarily by water removal, represent the greatest potential threat to these species. INTRODUCTION The beetle genus Polyphylla (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthini) is found discontinuously throughout the Northern Hemisphere. Of the 65 species known worldwide (Dalla Torre 1912, DeWailly 1948, 1993), 32 are found in the New World. Since the genus was first described by Harris (1841) over 73 names have been proposed for the 28 currently recognized species in America north of Mexico (Young, 1988). Numerous attempts have been made in the last 150 years to identify morphological characters that provide accurate species identifications. Indeed Polyphylla as a whole appears replete with apparent homoplasies and convergent evolution as its members have independently evolved similar characteristics to survive in extremely hostile environments. The present systematics of Polyphylla makes identification tentative at best. Fifteen of the 28 currently described species of Polyphylla north of Mexico are found in a single sand dune system or on a single mountain top (Young, 1988). Frequently, collection location is used to differentiate specimens because of a lack of substantial morphological characters. Five species of Polyphylla are currently Category 2 species-- candidates for federal listing as threatened or endangered but for____________________ _ which insufficient information is known to make a formal decision. The purpose of this study was threefold: 1) to ascertain the taxonomic status of the Category 2 species Polyphylla anteronivea and Polyphylla erratica using data from allozyme electrophoresis; 2) to survey Death Valley National Park and adjacent areas to determine the present distribution of both taxa; 3) to study the present populations in light of potential threats to their existence. The present distribution of both species was thought to be (Hardy and Andrews, 1978) primarily within the borders of· Death Valley National Park (Fig 1). Though described as separate species by Hardy and Andrews (1978) their current taxonomic status is in 2 question. As Young (1988) stated in his monograph "... there are certainly gradations between the two [Po anteronivea and P. erratica] which can only be clearly identified by the collecting locality". Upon extracting the aedeagi (not done by Hardy and Andrews (1978) at the time of the original description) Young (1988) found no significant differences and stated there "was insufficient data to decide whether these two names represent valid, somewhat cryptic species, or a single, perhaps clinal, taxon. This species [Po anteronivea] is very closely related to P. erratica, so closely III fact that I doubt that both names represent biological species." The Saline Valley Snow-front June Beetle (P. anteronivea) IS known only from the sand dune complex in the Saline Valley of Inyo Co., CA (Fig 2B). With the signing of the Desert Bill in early 1995, Saline Valley was incorporated into Death Valley National Park. Typical individuals are easily distinguished from closely related specIes (especially P. erratica) by the thick covering of white scales on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/morphologytaxono12haye ' / ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Volume XII PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS *, URBANA, ILLINOIS I EDITORIAL COMMITTEE John Theodore Buchholz Fred Wilbur Tanner Charles Zeleny, Chairman S70.S~ XLL '• / IL cop TABLE OF CONTENTS Nos. Pages 1. Morphological Studies of the Genus Cercospora. By Wilhelm Gerhard Solheim 1 2. Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea. By William Patrick Hayes 85 3. Sawflies of the Sub-family Dolerinae of America North of Mexico. By Herbert H. Ross 205 4. A Study of Fresh-water Plankton Communities. By Samuel Eddy 321 LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Vol. XII April, 1929 No. 2 Editorial Committee Stephen Alfred Forbes Fred Wilbur Tanner Henry Baldwin Ward Published by the University of Illinois under the auspices of the graduate school Distributed June 18. 1930 MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND BIOLOGY OF LARVAL SCARABAEOIDEA WITH FIFTEEN PLATES BY WILLIAM PATRICK HAYES Associate Professor of Entomology in the University of Illinois Contribution No. 137 from the Entomological Laboratories of the University of Illinois . T U .V- TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Introduction Q Economic importance Historical review 11 Taxonomic literature 12 Biological and ecological literature Materials and methods 1%i Acknowledgments Morphology ]* 1 ' The head and its appendages Antennae. 18 Clypeus and labrum ™ 22 EpipharynxEpipharyru Mandibles. Maxillae 37 Hypopharynx <w Labium 40 Thorax and abdomen 40 Segmentation « 41 Setation Radula 41 42 Legs £ Spiracles 43 Anal orifice 44 Organs of stridulation 47 Postembryonic development and biology of the Scarabaeidae Eggs f*' Oviposition preferences 48 Description and length of egg stage 48 Egg burster and hatching Larval development Molting 50 Postembryonic changes ^4 54 Food habits 58 Relative abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIFICAÇÃO COMENTADA DE COLEOPTERA Sergio Antonio
    III. MARCO SISTEMÁTICO DEL PROYECTO PRIBES 2002 CLASSIFICAÇÃO COMENTADA DE COLEOPTERA Sergio Antonio Vanin & Sergio Ide An annotated classification of the Coleoptera Abstract The Coleoptera are an extremely diversified group of insects with more than 350,000 described species. The conjunction of this richness with the different stages in the taxonomic knowledge make it difficult to obtain consistent classifications. The monophyly of the order and of each of the four suborders are largely accepted by the authors, however the relationships among the suborders are highly controversial. The most recent classification for the order was proposed by Lawrence & Newton (1995) and modified by Lawrence et al. (1999). In this paper we present comments on works that influenced or represented important contributions for the re-evaluation of this classification. Key words: classification, Coleoptera, diversity, phylogeny, Systematics Classificação comentada de Coleoptera Resumo Os Coleoptera constituem um grupo de insetos extremamente diversificado, com Sergio Antonio Vanin mais de 350.000 espécies descritas. Esta imensa variedade aliada ao conhecimen- Departamento de Zoologia, to taxonômico desuniforme dificultam a obtenção de classificações consistentes. Instituto de Biociências, As monofilias da ordem e de cada uma das quatro subordens são consenso entre Universidade de São Paulo, a maioria dos autores, entretanto as relações entre as subordens são alvo de muita Caixa Postal 11.294, controvérsia. A classificação mais recente para a ordem foi proposta por Lawrence 05422-970 São Paulo SP, Brasil. & Newton (1995) e modificada por Lawrence et al. (1999). Neste artigo são [email protected]. apresentados comentários sobre trabalhos que influenciaram ou representam contribuições importantes para a reavaliação dessa classificação.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Profound Head Modifications in Claviger Testaceus (Pselaphinae, Staphylinidae, Coleoptera) Facilitate Integration Into Communities of Ants
    Received: 15 April 2020 Revised: 8 June 2020 Accepted: 14 June 2020 DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21232 RESEARCH ARTICLE Profound head modifications in Claviger testaceus (Pselaphinae, Staphylinidae, Coleoptera) facilitate integration into communities of ants Paweł Jałoszynski 1 | Xiao-Zhu Luo2 | Rolf Georg Beutel2 1Museum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland Abstract 2Institut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Clavigeritae is a group of obligate myrmecophiles of the rove beetle subfamily Friedrich Schiller Universität Jena, Jena, Pselaphinae (Staphylinidae). Some are blind and wingless, and all are believed to Germany depend on ant hosts through feeding by trophallaxis. Phylogenetic hypotheses sug- Correspondence gest that their ancestors, as are most pselaphines today, were free-living predators. Paweł Jałoszynski, Museum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza Morphological alterations required to transform such beetles into extreme myrmeco- ł 21, 50 335 Wroc aw, Poland. philes were poorly understood. By studying the cephalic morphology of Claviger tes- Email: [email protected] taceus, we demonstrate that profound changes in all mouthpart components took Funding information place during this process, with a highly unusual connection of the maxillae to the AEI/FEDER, UE, Grant/Award Number: CGL2013 48950 C2 hypopharynx, and formation of a uniquely transformed labium with a vestigial prementum. The primary sensory function of the modified maxillary and labial palps is reduced, and the ventral mouthparts transformed into a licking/‘sponging’ device. Many muscles have been reduced, in relation to the coleopteran groundplan or other staphylinoids. The head capsule contains voluminous glands whose appeasement secretions are crucial for the beetle survival in ant colonies. The brain, in turn, has been shifted into the neck region.
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Guide for the Identification Of
    Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea Mallory Hagadorn Dr. Dana L. Price Department of Biological Sciences Salisbury University This document is a pictorial reference of Maryland Scarabaeoidea genera (and sometimes species) that was created to expedite the identification of Maryland Scarabs. Our current understanding of Maryland Scarabs comes from “An Annotated Checklist of the Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Maryland” (Staines 1984). Staines reported 266 species and subspecies using literature and review of several Maryland Museums. Dr. Price and her research students are currently conducting a bioinventory of Maryland Scarabs that will be used to create a “Taxonomic Guide to the Scarabaeoidea of Maryland”. This will include dichotomous keys to family and species based on historical reports and collections from all 23 counties in Maryland. This document should be cited as: Hagadorn, M.A. and D.L. Price. 2012. Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea. Salisbury University. Pp. 54. Questions regarding this document should be sent to: Dr. Dana L. Price - [email protected] **All pictures within are linked to their copyright holder. Table of Contents Families of Scarabaeoidea of Maryland……………………………………... 6 Geotrupidae……………………………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Bolboceratinae……………………………………………… 7 Genus Bolbocerosoma………………………………………… 7 Genus Eucanthus………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Geotrupinae………………………………………………… 8 Genus Geotrupes………………………………………………. 8 Genus Odonteus...……………………………………………… 9 Glaphyridae..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Desert Fishes Council 2003
    Proceedings of the Desert Fishes Council VOLUME XXXV 2003 ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM 16 - 19 November Death Valley California, U.S.A. Edited by Dean A. Hendrickson Texas Natural History Collection University of Texas at Austin 10100 Burnet Road, PRC 176 / R4000 Austin, Texas 78758-4445, U.S.A. and Lloyd T. Findley Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C.-Unidad Guaymas Carretera al Varadero Nacional Km. 6.6, “Las Playitas” Apartado Postal 284, Guaymas, Sonora 85400, MÉXICO published: online December 1, 2004; in print January 15, 2005 - ISSN 1068-0381 P.O. Box 337 Bishop, California 93515-0337 760-872-8751 Voice & Fax e-mail: [email protected] PROCEEDINGS OF THE DESERT FISHES COUNCIL – VOL.XXXV (2003 SYMPOSIUM) MISSION / MISIÓN The mission of the Desert Fishes Council is to preserve the biological integrity of desert aquatic ecosystems and their associated life forms, to hold symposia to report related research and management endeavors, and to effect rapid dissemination of information concerning activities of the Council and its members . OFFICERS / OFICIALES President: Paul C. Marsh, Arizona State University, School of Life Sciences, P.O Box 874501, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 Immediate Past President: David Propst, Conservation Services División, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, NM 87504 Executive Secretary: E. Phil Pister, P.O. Box 337, Bishop, California 93515-0337 COMMITTEES / COMITÉS Executive Committee: Michael E. Douglas, Anthony A. Echelle (Member-at-Large), Dean A. Hendrickson, Nadine Kanim, Paul C. Marsh, E. Phil Pister, David L. Propst, Jerome Stefferud Areas Coordinator: Nadine Kanim Awards: Astrid Kodric Brown Membership: Jerome Stefferud Proceedings Co-Editors: Lloyd T.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Species of North American Polyphylla Harris (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 1986 Three New Species of North American Polyphylla Harris (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) Ronald M. Young University of Nebraska State Museum Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Life Sciences Commons Young, Ronald M., "Three New Species of North American Polyphylla Harris (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)" (1986). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 218. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/218 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1986. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, XIV: 47-50. BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES THREE NEW SPECIES OF NORTH AMERICAN POLYPHYLLA HARRIS (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE: MELOLONTHINAE) Ronald M. Young Systematics Research Collections University of Nebraska State Museum Nebraska Hall W436 Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0514 Polyphylla brownae from Alabama, Polyphylla ratcliffei from Utah, and Polyphylla brownae new species Polyphylla stellata from California are described as new. They are correlated (Figs. 1, 2) with existing keys, and each holotype is illustrated. HOLOTYPE MALE. Body long, narrow, overall length 29.3 mm, width 12.1 mm. Elytra light brown, head and pron­ t t t otum deeper, richer brown.
    [Show full text]
  • INSECTA MUNDI a Journal of World Insect Systematics
    INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0085 A new species of Polyphylla Harris from peninsular Florida (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) with a key to species of the pubescens species group Paul E. Skelley Florida State Collection of Arthropods Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services - DPI P. O. Box 147100 Gainesville, FL 32614-7100, USA Date of Issue: July 24, 2009 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Paul E. Skelley A new species of Polyphylla Harris from peninsular Florida (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) with a key to species of the pubescens species group Insecta Mundi 0085: 1-14 Published in 2009 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 U. S. A. http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod taxon. Manuscripts considered for publication include, but are not limited to, systematic or taxonomic studies, revisions, nomenclatural changes, faunal studies, book reviews, phylo- genetic analyses, biological or behavioral studies, etc. Insecta Mundi is widely distributed, and refer- enced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Abstracts, etc. As of 2007, Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, not as quarterly issues. As manuscripts are completed they are published and given an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are again reviewed by the editorial board to insure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for System- atic Entomology. Managing editor: Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • SCARABS “Hvisdet Lugter, Vil De Komme”
    SCARABS “Hvisdet Lugter, Vil De Komme” Occasional Issue Number 15 November, 2004 Scarabs is Back!!! WITHIN THIS ISSUE As If Life Wasnʼt Bad Enough....Now This! Bad News ........................... 1 Okay, so we haven’t published a and coming face to face with the Bug-Proof Clothes ............ 2 Scarabs newsletter since Occasional drivel and forced humor within Issue 14, dated October, 1998. these pages. By posting Scarabs on Glorious Art ...................... 2 We apologize, but we have been the web, distribution is much more Revised Classifification busy. Editor Rich has been busy efficient. Only those foolish enough of the Scarabaeoidea ........ 3 chasing Phobetus panamintensis to tempt fate would dare to click and planning construction of his on our file. The PDF file containing Scatalogical Ramblings . 11 basement bug room. His stint each issue can be printed at will, if Notable Publications ..... 15 at a pro wrestling (“El Mierdo”) desired. proved to be short-lived when A Collecting Tip for “The Next Big Thing” threw Rich Thanks go to Scarab Central at Bradycinetulus .................16 into the crowd, wrenching Rich’s University of Nebraska for hosting back. Editor Barney was tied up for Scarabs on their web page. Pin Labels, Macs and Mi- crosoft Word ................... 17 awhile in a house-building project, and is building up a huge supply of Another change is that Scarabs About Scarabs ..................17 his “special bait” while praying that is now in color. To celebrate our airport security does not decide to first color issue, we are including Insect Pins ....................... 17 open all containers. Editor Bill has artwork of arguably one of the most Plea for Phanaeus ...........18 been busy on the scarab speaking beautiful scarab beetles on the circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for HUD-Funded Proposals Recommended Format Per 24 CFR 58.36, Revised March 2005 [Previously Recommended EA Formats Are Obsolete]
    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development San Francisco Regional Office - Region IX 600 Harrison Street San Francisco, California 94107-1387 www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov Environmental Assessment for HUD-funded Proposals Recommended format per 24 CFR 58.36, revised March 2005 [Previously recommended EA formats are obsolete]. Project Identification: Winterhaven Public Safety Facility Preparer: Kevin L. Grant, Ericsson-Grant, Inc. Responsible Entity: County of Imperial Month/Year: February/2017 1 Environmental Assessment Responsible Entity:_County of Imperial___ _____________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(7)] Certifying Officer:_Ralph Cordova, Jr. ___ ______________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(2)] Project Name: Winterhaven Public Safety Facility____________________________________ Project Location: 518 Railroad Avenue, Winterhaven, CA 92281________________________ Estimated total project cost: $2,870,446__________________________________________ Grant Recipient County of Imperial_______________________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(5)] Recipient Address: 940 W. Main Street, Suite 208, El Centro, CA 92243 Project Representative: Esperanza Colio Warren, Community & Economic Development Manager Telephone Number: (442) 265-1100 Conditions for Approval: (List all mitigation measures adopted by the responsible entity to eliminate or minimize adverse environmental impacts. These conditions must be included in project contracts and other relevant documents as requirements). [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1505.2(c)] Mitigation Measure AQ-1: During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, excessive fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by the following techniques: Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph. Limit the simultaneous disturbance area to as small an area as practical when winds exceed 25 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: a Compilation and Review
    Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: A Compilation and Review Nancy Hampton Abstract—Large tracts of important sagebrush (Artemisia L.) Major portions of the INL have been burned by wildfires habitat in southeastern Idaho, including thousands of acres at the over the past several years, and restoration and recovery of Idaho National Laboratory (INL), continue to be lost and degraded sagebrush habitat are current topics of investigation (Ander- through wildland fire and other disturbances. The roles of most son and Patrick 2000; Blew 2000). Most restoration projects, insects in sagebrush ecosystems are not well understood, and the including those at the INL, are focused on the reestablish- effects of habitat loss and alteration on their populations and ment of vegetation communities (Anderson and Shumar communities have not been well studied. Although a comprehen- 1989; Williams 1997). Insects also have important roles in sive survey of insects at the INL has not been performed, smaller restored communities (Williams 1997) and show promise as scale studies have been concentrated in sagebrush and associated indicators of restoration success in shrub-steppe (Karr and communities at the site. Here, I compile a taxonomic inventory of Kimberling 2003; Kimberling and others 2001) and other insects identified in these studies. The baseline inventory of more habitats (Jansen 1997; Williams 1997). than 1,240 species, representing 747 genera in 212 families, can be The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomic list of used to build models of insect diversity in natural and restored insects identified by researchers studying cold desert com- sagebrush habitats. munities at the INL.
    [Show full text]