DOCSLIB.ORG

The Taming of the Shrew an Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Taming of the Shrew an Introduction The Taming of The Shrew An Introduction Common Core Standards RL.11-12.7 Vocabulary for understanding ● Mystery plays- a popular medieval play based on biblical stories or the lives of the saints. ● “bad” quarto- In Shakespearean scholarship, a bad quarto (or pirated quarto) is a quarto- sized book that may be unreliable or contain more errors than other versions of the text ● Tudor- commonly refers to: Tudor period, a historical era in England coinciding with the rule of the Tudor dynasty ● Farce- a comic dramatic work using buffoonery and horseplay and typically including crude characterization and ludicrously improbable situations. (slapstick comedy, think the three stooges) ● Cuckold- the husband of an adulteress, often regarded as an object of derision. ● Archetype-a very typical example of a certain person or thing; an original that has been imitated. Background ● Date Written- This play has been difficult to date, but scholars know it must have been written between 1590-1594 ● Purpose it was written – written as a fantasy about courtship and marriage and is part of a group of plays written by Shakespeare all on this topic- The Two Gentlemen of Verona and The Comedy of Errors Background ● Source material- in 1594 there was a play published anonymously titled “The Taming of a Shrew” which is now believed to be “either a pirated or inaccurate version of Shakespeare’s comedy or else a ‘bad’ quarto of a different play, now lost, which also served Shakespeare as a source” ● The debate over this “source” does not matter much to scholars though because the plot of this play is based an ancient archetype: ● “Shrewish wives in English Drama can trace their descent from Mrs. Noah in the mystery plays, that indomitable scold who would not leave her ‘gossips’ and get into the ark at her husband’s bidding even though the whole world was drowning in the Flood.” –Anne Barton Source material continued ● Additionally the archetype of “intractable, violent, and sharp-tongued wives” who ordered their husbands about (some who even cheated regularly on their husbands- this is called cuckolding) “represents a familiar comic type in Tudor interludes and farces” ● Even further back in time the Roman comedies often included these difficult wives. ● All of these plays include a husband who “tames” his wild wife by remedies including physical violence “by ingenious and excruciating” means ● For example, one popular ballad “A Merry Jest of Shrewd and Curst Wife Lapped in Morel’s Skin for Her Good Behavior” describes a husband who “binds his erring spouse, beats he, and then incarcerates her inside the salted skin of the dead horse Morel” The play ●Title ● Meaning/purpose- brings to mind the archetype of the shrewish wife, a play type with which the English audience would have been well familiar Motifs ● Taming/Transformation ●To tame- not dangerous or frightened of people; domesticated. ● Usually used to refer to animals but in this play it refers to a woman. Takes away her “humanness” ●To transform- make a thorough or dramatic change in the form, appearance, or character of. Motifs (continued) ● Identity- the fact of being who or what a person or thing is. ● What makes an individual’s identity? Can this be defined? What is your identity? ● Roles ● Gender-roles: are sets of societal norms dictating what types of behaviors are generally considered acceptable, appropriate or desirable for a person based on their actual or perceived sex. ● Social-roles: are the part people play as members of a social group. With each social role you adopt, your behavior changes to fit the expectations both you and others have of that role. In the words of William Shakespeare: All the worlds a stage, And all the men and women merely players: They have their exits, and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many parts. Characters ● Characters to keep an eye on: ● Christopher Sly- a “tinkerer” (poor laborer); The man who is watching “the taming of the shrew” ● Baptista- Father of Katherine and Bianca ● Katherine- the “shrew”, older sister to Bianca ● Bianca- the beautiful younger sister whom everyone wants to marry ● Petruchio- a man looking to marry a wealthy woman ● Gremio, Hortensio, and Lucentio- Bianca’s suitors (boys be chasin’ her) Setting and Structure ● Frame play- ● meaning the story starts with Christopher Sly in the “real world” (Elizabethan/Renaissance England) → then he sits down to watch a play (play within a play) ● This play within a play is the actual taming of the shrew ● Christopher Sly’s tale is the sub plot of the play, even though it is introduced first because… well you’ll see… ● Renaissance (Shakespeare’s contemporary time) Padua, Italy Padua, Italy ●Padua claims to be the oldest city in northern Italy. ●According to a tradition dated at least to Virgil's Aeneid, and rediscovered by the medieval commune, it was founded in 1183 BC by the Trojan prince Antenor, ● passed under Venetian rule in 1405, and so mostly remained until the fall of the Venetian Republic in 1797..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gledališki List Uprizoritve
    1 Na vest, da vam je boljše, so prišli z vedro komedijo vaši igralci; zdravniki so tako priporočili: preveč otožja rado skrkne kri, čemernost pa je pestunja blaznila. Zato da igra vam lahko le hasne; predajte se veselju; kratkočasje varje pred hudim in življenje daljša. William Shakespeare, UKROČENA TRMOGLAVKA 2 3 4 5 William Shakespeare Ukročena trmoglavka La bisbetica domata avtorji priredbe so ustvarjalci uprizoritve adattamento a cura della compagnia režiser/ regia: Juš A. Zidar prevajalec/ traduzione: Milan Jesih dramaturginja/ dramaturg: Eva Kraševec scenografinja/ scene:Petra Veber kostumografinja/ costumi:Mateja Fajt avtor glasbe/ musiche: Jurij Alič lektorica/ lettore: Tatjana Stanič asistent dramaturgije/ assistente dramaturg: Sandi Jesenik Igrajo/ Con: Iva Babić Tadej Pišek Zdravniki so tako priporočili: Vladimir Jurc Tina Gunzek preveč otožja rado skrkne kri, Jernej Čampelj Ilija Ota čemernost pa je pestunja blaznila. Andrej Rismondo Vodja predstave in rekviziterka/ Direttrice di scena e attrezzista Sonja Kerstein Lo raccomandano i medici: Tehnični vodja/ Direttore tecnico Peter Furlan Tonski mojster/ Fonico Diego Sedmak l’amarezza ha congelato Lučni mojster/ Elettricista Peter Korošic Odrski mojster/ Capo macchinista Giorgio Zahar il vostro sangue e la malinconia Odrski delavec/ Macchinista Marko Škabar, Dejan Mahne Kalin Garderoberka in šivilja/ Guardarobiera Silva Gregorčič è nutrice di follia. Prevajalka in prirejevalka nadnapisov/ Traduzione e adattamento sovratitoli Tanja Sternad Šepetalka in nadnapisi/ Suggeritrice e sovratitoli Neda Petrovič Premiera: 16. marca 2018/ Prima: 16 marzo 2018 Velika dvorana/ Sala principale 6 prvih del (okoli leta 1592) odločil, da bo obravnaval ravno t.i. žensko In živela sta srčno esej 01 vprašanje, odnos, ki so ga imeli moški do žensk v elizabetinski družbi, še posebno v pojmovanju inštitucije poroke.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cea Forum 2019
    Winter/Spring THE CEA FORUM 2019 Situated Interpretation: Teaching Shakespeare with Live Performance Jessica Winston Idaho State University Writing back in 1997, W.B. Worthen observed that “actual stage performance” had been largely “omitted from the catalogue of ‘discourses’ that inform criticism” (Shakespeare and 154). Now over twenty years later, the situation has changed: one of the liveliest areas of Shakespeare studies is performance criticism—that is, the study of Shakespeare-related theatrical production, performance, and reception. Just as important, actual performance has become an established part of pedagogical practice. As several recent articles attest, Shakespeare instructors routinely incorporate performance-related exercises in their classrooms (e.g. Bevington; Boyer; Costa; Esposito; Hartley, “Dialectical Shakespeare”). It is also relatively common to require or encourage students to attend a live production, such as one might see at a Shakespeare festival or professional theatre, for instance the Guthrie or Folger, or at a regional, university, or community stage. Yet despite this field-wide investment in performance, the viewing and analysis of live productions in teaching remains a curiously unexamined convention in Shakespeare pedagogy. Initially, this claim may sound counterintuitive, if not patently incorrect. Since the 1980s, publications in Shakespeare pedagogy have increasingly emphasized performance approaches to Shakespeare, presenting course and lesson plans with the foundational idea that a Shakespeare play
    [Show full text]
  • Edward De Vere and the Two Shrew Plays
    The Playwright’s Progress: Edward de Vere and the Two Shrew Plays Ramon Jiménez or more than 400 years the two Shrew plays—The Tayminge of a Shrowe (1594) and The Taming of the Shrew (1623)—have been entangled with each other in scholarly disagreements about who wrote them, which was F written first, and how they relate to each other. Even today, there is consensus on only one of these questions—that it was Shakespeare alone who wrote The Shrew that appeared in the Folio . It is, as J. Dover Wilson wrote, “one of the most diffi- cult cruxes in the Shakespearian canon” (vii). An objective review of the evidence, however, supplies a solution to the puz- zle. It confirms that the two plays were written in the order in which they appear in the record, The Shrew being a major revision of the earlier play, A Shrew . They were by the same author—Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, whose poetry and plays appeared under the pseudonym “William Shakespeare” during the last decade of his life. Events in Oxford’s sixteenth year and his travels in the 1570s support composition dates before 1580 for both plays. These conclusions also reveal a unique and hitherto unremarked example of the playwright’s progress and development from a teenager learning to write for the stage to a journeyman dramatist in his twenties. De Vere’s exposure to the in- tricacies and language of the law, and his extended tour of France and Italy, as well as his maturation as a poet, caused him to rewrite his earlier effort and pro- duce a comedy that continues to entertain centuries later.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Induction Informs Katherine's Character in the Taming of the Shrew
    Can’t Be Tamed: How the Induction Informs Katherine’s Character in The Taming of the Shrew Sophia Dobischok, Simon Fraser University Abstract This paper was originally written for Dr. Ronda Arab’s English 203 course Early Modern Literature. The assignment asked students to write an essay about the effect of the introductory scenes (induction) in Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew. The paper uses MLA citation style. In analyses of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew there has always been contentious debate as to whether Katherine has or has not been successfully tamed by Petruchio. However, the induction provides a crucial framework with which to interpret Katherine’s character arc. The induction parallels the main play in that the lord attempts to tame Sly into performing the role of lord just as Petruchio attempts to tame Katherine into performing the role of submissive wife. Both the lord and Petruchio attempt to tame the person they control by constructing their reality, the lord by controlling Sly’s external environment and Petruchio by contradicting Katherine’s identity and experiences. However, the induction makes it clear that despite the lord’s attempt to make Sly believe in his environment and play the role of lord, he is not able to change Sly’s nature and make him truly become a lord. This provides a framework to understand the effect of Petruchio’s taming on Katherine. Thus, the purpose of the induction is to provide a framework to understand Petruchio and Katherine’s relationship, so we may ultimately understand that although Katherine outwardly plays the role of submissive wife her fierce nature has been undisrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Dd Shrewstudyguide.Pdf
    HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF DRAMA AND DANCE THE TAMING OF THE SHREW William Shakespeare STUDY GUIDE Written and compiled by James J. Kolb, Professor of Drama HOFSTRA/DRAMA 1997 A Study Guide to Hofstra University’s Department of Drama and Dance Production of The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare March 1997 Table of Contents The New Cambridge Shakespeare version of The Taming of the Shrew, edited by Ann Thompson, is the text used in the About Shakespeare 2 current production. It is published in paperback by Cambridge University Press, 40 West 20th Street, New York, Title Page of the First Folio Edition New York 10011-4211 of Shakespeare’s Plays 2 ISBN # 0 521 29388 X ($10.95) Shakespeare’s Coat of Arms 3 Shakespeare’s Plays 3 Shakespeare’s Theatre 4 HOFSTRA/DRAMA Department of Drama and Dance Summary of the Story 5 Hofstra University (516) 463-5444 The Sources of the Story 5 The Date of Composition and Special Problems With the Text of The Taming of the Shrew As Related to The Taming of a Shrew 6 A Few Critical Comments 7 The cover engraving is taken from James Edmund Harting’s About the Play on Stage 10 The Birds of Shakespeare (1871). It depicts hawks in training being carried to the field in “the cadge,” carried by “the Notable Lines 15 cadger.” See page 8 of the Study Guide for some additional comments about falconry. About the Play in Other Forms 16 The idea and format of this study guide is by Peter Sander.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taming of the Shrew 360°
    THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE Milton Glaser THE TAMING OF THE SHREW 360° A VIEWFINDER: Facts and Perspectives on the Play, Playwright, and Production 154 Christopher Street, Suite 3D, New York, NY 10014 • Ph: (212) 229-2819 • F: (212) 229-2911 • www.tfana.org tableTABLE OFOF CONTENTSCONTENTS The Play 3 Synopsis and Characters 4 Sources 7 The Induction 9 Sexual Politics and The Taming of the Shrew 13 Perspectives 16 Selected Performance History The Playwright 18 Biography 19 Timeline of the Life of the Playwright 22 Shakespeare and the American Frontier The Production 24 From the Director 25 Scenic Design 26 Building a Sustainable Set 28 Costume Design 31 Cast and Creative Team Further Exploration 35 Glossary 38 Bibliography About Theatre for a New Audience 40 Mission and Programs 41 Major Institutional Supporters Theatre for a New Audience’s production of The Taming of the Shrew is sponsored by Theatre for a New Audience’s production is part of Shakespeare for a New Generation, a national initiative sponsored by the National Endowment for the Arts in cooperation with Arts Midwest. Milton Glaser Notes This Viewfinder will be periodically updated with additional information. Last updated March 2012. Credits Compiled and written by: Carie Donnelson, with contributions from Jonathan Kalb | Edited by: Carie Donnelson and Katie Miller, with assistance from Abigail Unger | Literary Advisor: Jonathan Kalb | Designed by: Milton Glaser, Inc. | Copyright 2012 by Theatre for a New Audience. All rights reserved. With the exception of classroom use by teachers and individual personal use, no part of this study guide may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by an information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taming of the Shrew
    Shakespeare The Taming of the Shrew SYNOPSIS The Taming of the Shrew Christopher Sly, a poor tinker, falls asleep after being thrown out of an ale‐house because he is drunk. A lord takes him into his house and plays a trick on him by making him think he is a lord who has lost his memory for whom a company of players will perform the play 'The Taming of the Shrew'. This 'induction' is the frame story. In the play itself Hortensio, who wants to marry a rich woman, old Gremio, who wants to use his money to find a young wife, and Lucentio, who has just arrived in Padua, all want to marry beautiful Bianca, but her father Baptista insists that her older sister Kate must marry first. Kate is a 'shrew', a woman with her own ideas and a violent temper. Petruchio, from Verona, agrees to woo Kate, both for her dowry and for the challenge of 'taming' her. Hortensio and Lucentio both manage to spend time with Bianca by pretending to be tutors, while Lucentio's servant Tranio plays the role of his master. Petruchio marries Kate, but he arrives at the church wearing totally unsuitable clothes and takes her to his country house, where he uses various forms of deprivation to break her will, for instance pretending that any dishes or clothes she is brought are not good enough and must be sent away, or making her agree with everything he says, otherwise she will not be able to sleep or visit her family. Tranio persuades a travelling schoolteacher to pretend to be Lucentio's father, because Baptista wants to be sure that his potential son‐in‐law is respectable and rich enough.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrew Around a Deep Thrust Stage—With Only Nine Rows Separating the Farthest Dramatis Personae 10 Who’S Who 11 Seat from the Stage
    Biondello, rendering by Costume Designer Susan Mickey Barbara Gaines Artistic Director Table of Contents Carl and Marilynn Preface . .1 . Art That Lives . .2 . Thoma Endowed Chair Bard’s Bio . 3. The First Folio . .3 Criss Henderson Shakespeare’s England . 4. Executive Director The English Renaissance Theater . 5 The Courtyard-style Theater . 7. Timelines . 8 Chicago Shakespeare Theater is Chicago’s professional theater dedicated to the works of William Shakespeare. Founded as Shakespeare Repertory Shakespeare’s in 1986, the company moved to its seven-story home on Navy Pier in 1999. In its Elizabethan-style courtyard theater, 500 seats on three levels wrap The Taming of the Shrew around a deep thrust stage—with only nine rows separating the farthest Dramatis Personae . .10 . Who’s Who . .11 . .seat . from the stage. Chicago Shakespeare also features a flexible 180-seat The Story . 12 black box studio theater, a Teacher Resource Center, and a Shakespeare Act by Act Synopsis . 12. specialty. bookstall. In 2017, a new, innovative performance venue, The S omething Borrowed, Something New: Yard at Chicago Shakespeare, will expand CST's campus to include three Shakespeare’s Source. 14 To Have and To Hold: theaters. The year-round, flexible venue can be configured in a variety of Elizabethans and their Bonds of Marriage shapes and sizes with audience capacities ranging from 150 to 850, What’s in a (Genre’s) Name? . 15. defining the audience–artist relationship to best serve each production. Now in its thirty-first season, the Theater has produced nearly the entire Scholars’ Perspectives Shakespeare canon: All’s Well That Ends Well, Antony and Cleopatra, As Listening to Silence .
    [Show full text]
  • Ryan Farrar, Northern Arizona University the Noble Exposure Of
    Ryan Farrar, Northern Arizona University The Noble Exposure of Christopher Sly in The Taming of the Shrew The carnivalesque Induction of William Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew serves as an exposé of ideological privilege, detailing the shortcomings of England’s rigid social stratum and metatheatrically laying bare how the fiction of playacting mirrors the fictions governing the everyday life of the play’s audiences. Despite the jesting spirit of the Induction, the prank that elevates the lowly tinker Christopher Sly to the rank of a lord challenges the status of birth on which the English nobility staked its claim to authority and luxury. As Sly begins to assume the airs of a lord, however imperfectly, he displays that a person of lower rank can put on the performance of a nobleman and infiltrate the boundaries that insulate the higher ranks and prevent the commoners’ access to wealth and prestige. Prior to the prank, Sly speaks through prose, exemplified in his bickering with the hostess, but after, his speech magically transforms into verse, which is often used by Shakespeare’s noble characters, once the Lord and his men persuade him that he has always lived as a lord. As Wayne Rebhorn asserts, “the Lord’s reidentification of Christopher Sly as a nobleman after a change in dress and situation indicates the arbitrariness of class distinctions.”1 On the stage, Sly mingles with nobles as an equal, both in privilege and in manners. Despite its function as a derisive joke, the presentation of Sly as a nobleman threatens to level the entitlements reserved for the aristocracy as the stage’s imaginary space brings awareness to social inequality through the fantasy that the prank rouses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taming of the Shrew: Deproblematising a Problem Play
    THE TAMING OF THE SHREW: DEPROBLEMATISING A PROBLEM PLAY Rana TEKÇAN * From Juliet’s “ What’s in a name? ” to Bottom’s “ Methought I was – there is no man can tell what” , Shakespeare is preoccupied with identity and its endless permutations. One product of this preoccupation is The Taming of the Shrew which emphatically engages in questions of who one is, who one choses or is forced to be; questions of how one is capable of putting on/taking off an identity as if it “ were essentially a suit of clothes ”1. Dealing with these questions – especially ones presented in conjunction with the misogynic “taming plot” – proved to be difficult for 20th century critics. As Stevie Davies writes in her appropriately titled chapter “Shakespeare Can’t Have Meant It (Can He?)”, the criticism of the play was “dominated by feelings of unease and embarrasment, accompanied by the desire to prove that Shakespeare cannot have meant what he seems to be saying; and that therefore he cannot really be saying it ”2. This desire for a proof led some critics to assign the play an undercurrent that moves counter to its apparent misogyny. Others saw in it elements of Brechtian alienation; still others read it as a historical representation of gender politics 3. The focal point of these various approaches was Shakespeare’s “intention” and it was a risky point to move from. There is, of course, no way of knowing Shakespeare’s intention. More significantly perhaps, as Marjorie Garber reminds us, we do not even have a single point of view in a play, and Shakespeare is particularly gifted in “ provid[ing], in almost every case, a credible contrary argument, on stage, to what might seem to be a prevailing view point ”4.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Performativity, and Gender in Shakespeare's the Taming of the Shrew
    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Student Research Submissions Spring 5-2-2019 Power, Performativity, and Gender in Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew Clara Sigmon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Sigmon, Clara, "Power, Performativity, and Gender in Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew" (2019). Student Research Submissions. 279. https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research/279 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research Submissions by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Clara Sigmon Sigmon 1 Professor Richard Finkelstein English 447P April 24, 2019 Power, Performativity, and Gender in Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew In William Shakespeare's play The Taming of the Shrew, both Petruchio and Katherine Minola fail to represent themselves according to socially constructed gender roles. While Petruchio never ceases to move freely in and out of prescribed masculine behavior due to the security afforded to him by class and gender, Kate is bestialized and oppressed in a representation of anxieties surrounding strong, intelligent women in society. Kate's final speech has been interpreted as an indication that the initially unruly "shrew" is successfully tamed by Petruchio in a declaration of absolute, patriarchal values. On the contrary, I will focus on language and performativity throughout The Taming of the Shrew in order to demonstrate the ways in which Kate learns to subversively express her desire and gain power.
    [Show full text]
  • Illusions of the Other's Nature As My Own: a Critique of a Theory of Embodied Cognition
    eSharp Issue 19: Reality/ Illusion Illusions of the other’s Nature as My Own: A Critique of a Theory of Embodied Cognition Author: Laura Seymour Source: eSharp, Issue 19: Reality/ Illusion(2012) pp. 33-55 URL: http://www.gla.ac.uk/esharp ISSN: 1742-4542 Copyright in this work remains with the author. _______________________________________________________ eSharp is an international online journal for postgraduate research in the arts, humanities, social sciences and education. Based at the University of Glasgow and run by graduate students, it aims to provide a critical but supportive entry to academic publishing for emerging academics, including postgraduates and recent postdoctoral students. [email protected] eSharp Issue 19: Reality/ Illusion Illusions of the other's Nature as My Own: A Critique of a Theory of Embodied Cognition Laura Seymour (Birkbeck, University of London) The Taming of the Shrew is framed by a narrative involving the performance of fictional gender. In the Induction to the play, Christopher Sly is hauled off the streets and presented with an ideal woman who claims to be his wife: this woman is obedient, docile, and beautiful. She is also, however, male, and her ideal behaviour emphatically fictional: her wifely crying is done with the aid of an onion for instance, and she is none other than a page boy (sometimes identified as going by the name of Bartholomew) in real life. This framing, this aboutness, to pun on two senses of about (the main Kate- Petruchio plot is about gender and performance and the Induction’s performances of gender run circumfluently about the Kate-Petruchio plot) makes illusory performances of gender a theme of The Taming of the Shrew.
    [Show full text]