Information to Users
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be firom any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North: Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9031177 Wind band performance repertoire at the university level: A survey of collegiate wind band curricula and current repertoire selection processes Woike, David Otto, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1990 Copyright ©1990 by Woike, David Otto. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 WIND BAND PQÎFORMANCE REPERTOIRE AT THE UNIVERSITY LEVEL; A SURVEY OF COLLEGIATE WIND BAND CURRICULA AND CURRENT REPERTOIRE SELECTION PROCESSES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David Otto Woike, B.M.E., M.A. The Ohio State University 1990 Dissertation Committee: Approved By A. Peter Costaoza Craig Kirchhoff Adviser Jon R. Woods School of Music Copyright by David Otto Voike 1990 DEDICATION To my wife, Teresa M. Woike 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author of this v o rt vouid like to acknowledge ail those individuals who participated directly or indirectly with this research project. A special note of gratitude is extended to the members of the reading committee. Dr. Jon R. Woods. Professor Craig Kirchhoff, and my adviser Dr. A. Peter Costanza. Their encouragement, advice, and unending moral support throughout the course of this project are deeply appreciated. Special thanks are extended as well to David Scott for his editorial assistance, and to Randy Luikart for his expertise and friendly advice. Finally, a special dept of gratitude is owed to my family: my wife Teresa, for her continued patience, understanding, encouragement, love and support throughout our years of learning and growth: my children Maria and David, for understanding and still smiling: my parents Otto and Elaine Woike, for instilling the desire to learn: and Teresa's parents Sam and Omega Murrell, for being there. I l l VITA July 7.1936 .................................................................... Born -H&ffliltoû, Ohio 1979 ................................................................................B.Mf .. The Ohio Slate University, Cc!umbus, Ohio 1979 - 1988 .................................................................... Associate Director, Instrumental Music, Fairfield City Schools, Fairfield, Ohio 1986 ................................................................................M.A. in Music Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1988 - 1990 .................................................................... Graduate Assistant, School of Music, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Music Education Studies in Music Education. Dr. A. Peter Costanza Studies in Instrumental Conducting. Professor Craig Kirchhoff Studies in Instrumental Music Education. Dr. Jon R. Woods IV TABLE OFœNTENTS DEDICATION............................................................................................................... ü ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................iü VITA.........................................................................................................................iv LISTOFTABLES....................................................................................................... vü Chapter I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................1 Need for the Study ............................................................................2 Statement of the Problem .................................................................3 Purpose of the Study ........................................................................ 4 Definition of Terms .......................................................................... 6 Limitations........................................................................................7 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE.........................................................................9 The Collegiate Concert Band and its Literature................................................................10 Literature for Public School Instrumental Music Education .................................................................. 16 Summary of Related Literature ......................................................22 III. PROCEDURE............................................................................................23 Population and Sample ...................................................................23 Survey Questionnaire .....................................................................23 Development of the Survey Questionnaire .....................................27 Procedures ......................................................................................29 Treatment of the Data .....................................................................29 IV. PRESENTATION OFTHE DATA................................................................. 31 Results from the Survey Questionnaire..........................................32 Basic Information from the Collegiate Wind Band Survey ..............................................33 Results from the Repertoire Listing Compilation ............................................................72 Table of Contents (continued). V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................75 Summary of the Study ....................................................................75 Summary of Results ....................................................................... 80 Results Pertaining to the Repertoire Oimpilation ...................................................... 88 Conclusions .................................................................................... 89 Implications ...................................................................................92 Recommendations ..........................................................................95 Suggestions for the Development of a Collegiate Wind Band Curriculum ...................................... % BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................................................................................... 100 APPENDICES...........................................................................................................103 A. Survey Questionnaire ..........................................................................103 B. Repertoire Listing Suggested Format ..................................................117 C Collegiate Survey Cover Letter ............................................................119 D. Pilot Survey Evaluation Form ............................................................. 122 E. First Follow-Up Letter ......................................................................... 124 F Second Follow-Up Letter ..................................................................... 126 G. List of Individuals Included in the Random Sample ........................... 128 H. Repertoire Compilation- Alphabetical by Composer's Last Name ........................................ 131 I. Repertoire Compilation - Alphabetical by Composition Title................................................168 J. Repertoire Compilation - Sorted by Frequency Of Performance and Composer's Last Name ..................................205 E. Addendum to the Repertoire Compilation; Listing of Multiple Editions of Compositions ................................ 242 VI LISTOFTABLES Table 1. Survey Questionnaire Validation Results .................................................. 28 2. Survey Questionnaire Response Data ........................................................ 32 3. Summary of Enrollment ............................................................................33 4. Range of Concert Band Enrollments ......................................................... 34 3. Strength of Instructional Program .......................................................... 34 6.