DOCSLIB.ORG

Ballistic Missile)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ballistic Missile) SNS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY (An Autonomous Institution) Coimbatore-35 TITLE: SURFACE TO SURFACE MISSILES Prepared by 16AE014 Final year Aeronautical Engineering SNS College of Technology 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 1 • A surface-to-surface missile (SSM) or ground-to-ground missile (GGM) is a missile designed to be launched from the ground or the sea and strike targets on land or at sea. • They may be fired from hand-held or vehicle mounted devices, from fixed installations, or from a ship. 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 2 A guided missile is an unmanned explosive-carrying vehicle that moves above the earth's surface in a flight path controlled by an external or internal source. There are many kinds of guided missiles, but all have the same ultimate function: destroy enemy "targets", i.e., personnel, tanks, vehicles, airplanes, ships, and weapons, including attacking missiles. Some missiles attack targets at long distances - thousands of miles - like the ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile). These are "strategic" missiles. Missile Parts and Their Functions. Most of the missile body is made of a titanium alloy, which provides high strength and low weight. A missile can be divided functionally into 8 sections: radome, guidance, warhead, autopilot, dorsal fins, rocket motor, steering control and control surfaces. These missile sections are described below. 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 3 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 4 Radome. A housing made of ceramic material similar to the household "Corningware“and located at the front end ("nose") of the missile. Here are some radomes on the production line . The radome is non-metallic to act as an electromagnetic (EM) "window" for radar or heat-seeking EM devices located inside the missile. Radar (Radio Ranging and Detection), transmits EM pulses that bounce off the target and return to the radar set to provide target location, direction and speed. Guidance. A system that receives radio information from its launch controller (a computer, not a human), directing it to launch the missile and calculate its most efficient path to the target. The Guidance system also transmits all missile functions back to its launch controller for continuous monitoring of missile subsystem performance Warhead. A system containing missile internal "homing" radar and an explosive surrounded by thousands of serrated iron pieces or other destroying material, depending on the nature of the anticipated target. As the missile approaches ("homes in on") the target, its internal radar electronically "sees" and locks onto the target to guide the missile towards it. Not all missiles have this "homing" radar. If not, its launch control must continuously direct it to the target. 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 5 Autopilot. • A system that provides missile location, direction, velocity and "attitude" (up, down sideways, etc.) and the capacity to change its motion via the Control Surfaces (see below). • The Autopilot contains an antenna to receive and transmit information to its home controller. • It also contains a battery that supplies electrical power to the missile electronic and microprocessor components. &bnsp; • Transmissions to and from the missile must be encoded and decoded to prevent electronic spying by other countries' surveillance radars. Dorsal Fins. The fins, along with the missile body, provide surfaces against which air exerts pressure. These dorsal surfaces are used by the Control Surfaces (see below) to change the direction and attitude of the missile. Rocket Motor. A mixture of solid chemical fuels. When ignited, the chemicals propel the missile from its launcher into space. 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 6 Steering Control. A system that electrically changes the Control Surfaces (see below) that change the missile motion. It reacts to information sent to it by the Autopilot (see above). Control Surfaces. These are four "fins" that act against air resistance to change the direction of the missile. 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 7 IN INDIA Surface-to-surface missiles Agni-I India Medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) 700-1250 km Mach 7.5 Agni-II India Intermediate-range ballistic missile(IRBM) 2,000–3,000 km Mach 12 Agni-III India Intermediate-range ballistic missile(IRBM) 3,500 km – 5,000 km 5–6 km/s Agni-IV India Intermediate-range ballistic missile(IRBM) 3,000 – 4,000 km Mach 7 Agni-V India Intercontinental ballistic missile(ICBM) 5000 – 8000Km Mach 24 8,000 km to Agni-VI four-stage intercontinental ballistic missile 12,000 km Prithvi I India Short Range Ballistic Missile(Tactical) 150 km Prithvi II India Short Range Ballistic Missile(Tactical) 350 km Prithvi III Short Range Ballistic Missile(Tactical) 350 km to 600 km Dhanush India Short Range Ballistic Missile(Tactical) 350 – 600 km Prahaar(Pragati) India Short Range Ballistic Missile(Tactical) 150 km Mach 2.03 Hypersonic surface-to-surface tactical missile Shaurya India 750 to 1,900 km Mach 7.5 Medium-Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM) Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles Sagarika (K-15) India Ballistic Missile 700 – 1900Km Mach 7+ K-4 India Ballistic Missile 3,500–5,000 km Mach 7+ K-5 1.10.19 India Ballistic Missile 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 6,000 km 8 Ashwin India Ballistic Missile 150-200km Mach 4.5 Surface to surface missiles types Ballistic missiles travel in a high trajectory, motor burns out partway through flight Tactical ballistic missile: Range between about 150 km and 300 km Battlefield range ballistic missile (BRBM): Range less than 200 km Theatre ballistic missile (TBM): range between 300 km and 3500 km Short-range ballistic missile (SRBM): Range 1000 km or less Medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM): Range between 1000 km and 3500 km Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) or Long-range ballistic missile (LRBM): Range between 3500 km and 5500 km Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM): Range greater than 5500 km Submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM): Launched from ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), all current designs have intercontinental range. Cruise missiles travel low to the ground, motor burns during entire flight, typical range 2,500 km (1,500 mi) Anti-tank guided missiles travel low to the ground, may or may not burn motor throughout flight, typical range 5 km (3 mi) Anti-ship missiles travel low over the ground and sea, and often pop up or jink before striking the target ship; typical range 130 km (80 mi) 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 9 SOME EXAMPLES OF SSM The MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATacMS) is a surface-to-surface missile (SSM) manufactured by the American company Lockheed Martin. It has a range of over 100 miles (160 km), with solid propellant, and is 13 feet (4.0 m) high and 24 inches (610 mm) in diameter. The RBS-15 (Robotsystem 15) is a long-range fire-and-forget surface-to- surface and air-to-surface, anti-ship missile. The later version Mk. III has the ability to attack land targets as well. The missile was developed by the Swedish company Saab Bofors Dynamics. 1.10.19 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 10 The Otomat Engine Turbojet engine Operational >360 km (190 nmi) range Speed 310 m/s (690 mph; 1,100 km/h; Mach 0.91) Guidance Inertial guidance, GPS and active radar system homing Launch Surface-launched platform S-100 fitted with a Lightweight Multirole Missile Type Light Air-to-surface and Surface-to- surface missile Place of origin United Kingdom Propellant 2-stage solid propellant Operational 8 km (5 miles) range Speed Mach 1.5 Guidance Multi-mode guidance (Laser beam riding and/or semi- system active laser guidance & terminal infrared homing) Launch Wildcat 1.10.19 platform 16AE409 Rockets & Missiles 11 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prepared by Textore, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020
    AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES CAPABILITIES AND DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA Prepared by TextOre, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020 Printed in the United States of America by the China Aerospace Studies Institute ISBN 9798574996270 To request additional copies, please direct inquiries to Director, China Aerospace Studies Institute, Air University, 55 Lemay Plaza, Montgomery, AL 36112 All photos licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, or under the Fair Use Doctrine under Section 107 of the Copyright Act for nonprofit educational and noncommercial use. All other graphics created by or for China Aerospace Studies Institute Cover art is "J-10 fighter jet takes off for patrol mission," China Military Online 9 October 2018. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2018-10/09/content_9305984_3.htm E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.airuniversity.af.mil/CASI https://twitter.com/CASI_Research @CASI_Research https://www.facebook.com/CASI.Research.Org https://www.linkedin.com/company/11049011 Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, Intellectual Property, Patents, Patent Related Matters, Trademarks and Copyrights; this work is the property of the U.S. Government. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights Reproduction and printing is subject to the Copyright Act of 1976 and applicable treaties of the United States. This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This publication is provided for noncommercial use only.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Inertial Guidance Technology for Aerospace Systems
    AIAA 2013-5123 August 19-22, 2013, Boston, MA AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference Advances in Inertial Guidance Technology for Aerospace Systems Robert D. Braun1, Zachary R. Putnam2, Bradley A. Steinfeldt3, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332 and Michael J. Grant4 Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN,47907 The origin, evolution, and outlook of guidance as a path and trajectory manager for aerospace systems is addressed. A survey of theoretical developments in the field is presented demonstrating the advances in guidance system functionality built upon inertial navigation technology. Open-loop and closed-loop approaches for short-range systems, long-range systems and entry systems are described for both civilian and military applications. Over time, guidance system development has transitioned from passive and open-loop systems to active, closed-loop systems. Significant advances in onboard processing power have improved guidance system capabilities, shifting the algorithmic computational burden to onboard systems and setting the stage for autonomous aerospace systems. Seminal advances in aerospace guidance are described, highlighting the advancements in guidance and resulting performance improvements in aerospace systems. Nomenclature aT = Thrust acceleration vector D = Drag f1 = Proportional gain f2 = Derivative gain f4 = Integral gain g = Acceleration due to gravity H = Altitude m = Mass v = Velocity vg = Velocity-to-be-gained vector Q = Gain matrix Downloaded by PURDUE UNIVERSITY on January 13, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-5123 R = Slant range T = Thrust magnitude ( )0 = Reference value I. Introduction HE objective of guidance is to modify the trajectory of a vehicle in order to reach a target1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problems of Standardization of Ground-To-Air Missiles
    5th International Scientific and Business Conference—Future Engineering 2019 ISBN: 978-1-60595-632-9 The Problems of Standardization of Ground-to-Air Missiles Paweł Dobrzyński1, Stanisław Lipski2, Bogdan Machowski1 and Roman Musiał3 ABSTRACT The article presents the issue of determining tactical and technical premises for proposed standards of calibres of ground-to-air missiles. The possession of the missile-to-air missile systems by the state is not an end in itself, or a way of mutual allied settlements, and is a requirement of the modern battlefield. In connection with the decisions made in the Wisła program, only the Narew program implemented by Polish enterprises can improve the air defense capabilities of the country and operational forces. The proposal for the standardization of ground-to- air missiles is aimed at defining the requirements for these missiles to such an extent as to increase the sense of security of citizens in peacetime, while, in wartime, the loss of human life and infrastructure will be reduced. During military operations, the state of air defense is no longer of such importance for the state authorities, because the authorities are evacuated in the face of threats, because they are the greatest asset of the nation. In the case of combat operations, the standardization of arms systems is the basis for logistical security. The purchase of rocket equipment for half an hour of combat is pointless, because, during this time, there will be no direct contact with the opponent, while the potential opponent probably has supplies for many hours of combat activities. If it is planned to start combat operations on its own, it makes sense, because, after the firing of the first volley, there will be no more.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 41/Monday, March 2, 2020/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Notices 12271 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3 may be accessed at ACTION: Arms sales notice. of Executive Order 13891 requires www.nationalservice.gov/guidance on federal agencies to ‘‘establish or or after February 28, 2020. SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is maintain on its website a single, (Authority: E.O. 13891, 84 FR 55,235; OMB publishing the unclassified text of an searchable, indexed database that Memorandum M–20–02) arms sales notification. contains or links to all guidance documents in effect from such agency or Dated: February 24, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: component.’’ Executive Order 13891, 84 Amy Borgstrom, Karma Job at [email protected] or (703) 697–8976. FR 55,235 (October 9, 2019). Associate Director of Policy. Question 1 of OMB Memorandum M– [FR Doc. 2020–04226 Filed 2–28–20; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 20–02 further requires agencies to ‘‘send BILLING CODE 6050–28–P 36(b)(1) arms sales notification is to the Federal Register a notice published to fulfill the requirements of announcing the existence of the new section 155 of Public Law 104–164 guidance portal and explaining that all dated July 21, 1996. The following is a DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE guidance documents remaining in effect copy of a letter to the Speaker of the are contained on the new guidance House of Representatives, Transmittal portal.’’ OMB Memorandum M–20–02 Office of the Secretary 19–55, Policy Justification and (October 31, 2019). [Transmittal No. 19–55] Sensitivity of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Imaging and Sensors Industry
    Defense Industrial Base Assessment: U.S. Imaging and Sensors Industry October 2006 U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security Defense Industrial Base Assessment: U.S. Imaging and Sensors Industry Prepared By U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security For further information about this report, contact Ron DeMarines, Senior Trade and Industry Analyst (202) 482-3755 [email protected]; or Brad Botwin, Supervisory Industrial Specialist (202) 482-4060 [email protected] Learn more about our organization at http://www.bis.doc.gov/ Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................I-1 II. Technology Overview ...................................................................................................... II-1 A. Imaging and Sensors Technologies ........................................................................II-1 A.1 Image and Sensor Devices...............................................................................II-2 B. Image Enhancement................................................................................................II-3 B.1 Generation 1.....................................................................................................II-4 B.2 Generation 2....................................................................................................II-5 B.3 Generation
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Us Anti-Satellite Weapons '
    CASE STUDY 1 THE HISTORY OF US ANTI-SATELLITE WEAPONS ':.: THE HISTORY OF US ANTISATELLITE WEAPON SYSTEMS ---------------------------------------------- Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THE HISTORY OF US AND SOVIET ASAT PROGRAMS AND OF DIPLOMATIC INTERACTIONS 4 1) The General Context, The Genesis of Ideas and the Derivation of US Programs 4 2) Orbital Nuclear Weapons, The USSR Threat, US Concept Studies and Early Negotiations (1962-1963) 9 3) US Antisatellite Programs 13 4) The USSR Antisatellite Program, 1968 to the Present 27 5) US-USSR Negotiations for ASAT Control (1977-1979) 35 III. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 42 IV. REFERENCES AND NOTES 53 V• TABLES AND FIGURES 66 VI • APPENDICES 1 ) US Satellite Monitoring and Tracking Systems 81 2) The X-20, DYNA-SOAR 88 3) Other Lifting Body Reentry Vehicles 96 4) The Space Shuttle 100 5) "Space Denia1" (1958-1963) 104 - 1 - I. INTRODUCTION The military significance of antisatellite (ASAT) systems is in the importance of the capabilities that they threaten. The uses of satellites in support of military programs has burgeoned into an ever increasing number of areas. Reconnaissance satellites provide information on the location and numbers of strategic weapons, the disposition of fleets and strike forces, and the deployment of tactical forces in wartime. Communi­ cations satellites provide enormously enhanced command-and-control capa­ bilities in the disposition of one's forces. Early-warning systems alert one to the launch of the opponent's strategic missiles. Geodetic satellites provide information for the targeting of one's own weapons· and the improve­ ment of their accuracy. Weather satellites aid fleets to hide under cover and aircraft to improve their routes to targets or destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Countermeasures.Pdf
    Countermeasures Study group organized by the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Security Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Countermeasures A Technical Evaluation of the Operational Effectiveness of the Planned US National Missile Defense System Andrew M. Sessler (Chair of the Study Group), John M. Cornwall, Bob Dietz, Steve Fetter, Sherman Frankel, Richard L. Garwin, Kurt Gottfried, Lisbeth Gronlund, George N. Lewis, Theodore A. Postol, David C. Wright April 2000 Union of Concerned Scientists MIT Security Studies Program © 2000 Union of Concerned Scientists Acknowledgments All rights reserved The authors would like to thank Tom Collina, Stuart Kiang, Matthew Meselson, and Jeremy Broughton for their comments and assistance. The authors owe a special note of The Union of Concerned Scientists is a partnership of citizens and gratitude to Eryn MacDonald scientists working to build a cleaner environment and a safer world. For and Anita Spiess for their more information about UCS’s work on arms control and international contributions and dedication, security, visit the UCS website at www.ucsusa.org. without which this report The Security Studies Program (SSP) is a graduate-level research and would not have been possible. educational program based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Center for International Studies. The program’s primary task is educating the next generation of scholars and practitioners in This report and its dissemina- international security policymaking. SSP supports the research work of graduate students, faculty, and fellows, and sponsors seminars, confer- tion were funded in part by ences, and publications to bring its teaching and research results to the grants to the Union of Con- attention of wider audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • NPR 9.2: Layered Defense, Layered Attack: the Missile Race in The
    MOHAMED KADRY SAID Layered Defense, Layered Attack: The Missile Race in the Middle East MOHAMED KADRY SAID Major General (retired) Dr. Mohamed Kadry Said is a Military and Technology Advisor at the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, Cairo, Egypt, member of the committee for strategic planning in the Egyptian Council for Space Research, Science and Technology, and member of the Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs. Dr. Kadry Said is a contributor to Al-Ahram newspaper and author of many publications on security issues in Arabic and in English. he 1956 and 1967 Arab-Israeli Wars were charac- vided valuable protection for Egyptian troops in their sur- terized by Israeli air superiority, relying primarily prise attack across the Suez Canal and the “Bar Lev” line Ton advanced aircraft and competent air attack op- fortifications. Although the number of the Israeli strike erational concepts. In the 1967 War, most of the Egyp- aircraft and their ammunition payload increased from 266 tian air force was destroyed on the ground by a blitzkrieg aircraft and 250 tons/sortie in 1967 to 540 aircraft and Israeli air attack in the early morning of June 5, 1967. 1820 tons/sortie in 1973, approximately one-third of Is- Egyptian air defense, relying mainly on anti-aircraft artil- raeli aircraft were shot down in the early days of the war.1 lery, failed to intercept Israel’s advanced aircraft. The di- It was clear that air defense operations on the Egyptian sastrous results of the war forced Egypt to revolutionize side had been closely interwoven with other air and ground its armed forces and, in particular, its air defense.
    [Show full text]
  • DISEC Ballistic Missiles
    ATSMUN 2018 Forum: Disarmament and International Security Committee Topic: The Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Student Officer: Thomas Antoniou Position: Chair ! ! Page !1 ATSMUN 2018 The Intercontinental Ballistic Missile An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a guided ballistic missile with a minimum range of 5,500 kilometres (3,400 mi) primarily designed for nuclear weapons delivery (delivering one or more thermonuclear warheads). Similarly, conventional, chemical, and biological weapons can also be delivered with varying effectiveness, but have never been deployed on ICBMs. Most modern designs support multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to carry several warheads, each of which can strike a different target. Early ICBMs had limited precision, which made them suitable for use only against the largest targets, such as cities. They were seen as a “safe” basing option, one that would keep the deterrent force close to home where it would be difficult to attack. Attacks against military targets (especially hardened ones) still demanded the use of a more precise manned bomber. Second- and third-generation designs (such as the LGM-118 Peacekeeper) dramatically improved accuracy to the point where even the smallest point targets can be successfully attacked. ICBMs are differentiated by having greater range and speed than other ballistic missiles: intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs), short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs) and tactical ballistic missiles (TBMs). Short and medium-range ballistic missiles are known collectively as theatre ballistic missiles. The history of the ICBM ! Throughout history several states have attempted to develop nuclear weapons with ballistic capabilities. After the first use of nuclear weapons in 1945 many test were conducted to significantly expand the knowledge about nuclear weapons and their capabilities, The graph above shows all the test conducted by all states with successful nuclear development programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy16 Ballistic Missile Defense Systems
    FY15FY16 TABLE OF CONTENTS DOT&E Activity and Oversight FY16 Activity Summary 1 Program Oversight 7 Problem Discovery Affecting OT&E 13 DOD Programs Major Automated Information System (MAIS) Best Practices 23 Defense Agencies Initiative (DAI) 29 Defensive Medical Information Exchange (DMIX) 33 Defense Readiness Reporting System – Strategic (DRRS-S) 37 Department of Defense (DOD) Teleport 41 DOD Healthcare Management System Modernization (DHMSM) 43 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter 47 Global Command and Control System – Joint (GCCS-J) 107 Joint Information Environment (JIE) 111 Joint Warning and Reporting Network (JWARN) 115 Key Management Infrastructure (KMI) Increment 2 117 Next Generation Diagnostic System (NGDS) Increment 1 121 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Increment 2 123 Theater Medical Information Program – Joint (TMIP-J) 127 Army Programs Army Network Modernization 131 Network Integration Evaluation (NIE) 135 Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Program (SEP) Main Battle Tank (MBT) 139 AH-64E Apache 141 Army Integrated Air & Missile Defense (IAMD) 143 Chemical Demilitarization Program – Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives (CHEM DEMIL-ACWA) 145 Command Web 147 Distributed Common Ground System – Army (DCGS-A) 149 HELLFIRE Romeo and Longbow 151 Javelin Close Combat Missile System – Medium 153 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Family of Vehicles (FoV) 155 Joint Tactical Networks (JTN) Joint Enterprise Network Manager (JENM) 157 Logistics Modernization Program (LMP) 161 M109A7 Family of Vehicles (FoV) Paladin Integrated Management (PIM) 165
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Intelligence Supplement
    The AAF Scientific Advisory Group was activated late in 1944 by General of the Army H. H. Arnold. He se­ cured the senices of Dr. Theodore von Karman, re­ nowned scientist and consultant in aeronautics, who agreed to organize and direct the group. Dr. von Karman gathered about him a group of Ameri­ can scientists from every field of research having a bearing on air power. These men then analyzed im­ portant developments in the basic sciences, both here and abroad, and attempted to evaluate the effects of their application to air power. This volume is one of a group of reports made to the Army Air Forces by the Scientific Advisory Group. 1hIa doculllent contains IIIfannotlon affecting .... ftCIfIonal de*- of .... UnIted Statft wtthIft .... lIIeaning of .... Espionage Act. 50 U. S. C.. 31 and 32. al alMftded.1ta lraMriulan or .... revelation of Its -...... In any Il10_ to all UIIOutharized ~ Is pt'OhIblted by law. AAF SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY GROUP Dr. Th. von Karman Director Colonel F. E. Glantzberg Dr. H. L. Dryden Deputy Director, Military Deputy Director, Scientific Lt Col G. T. McHugh, Executive Capt C. H. Jackson, Jr., Secretary CONSULTANTS Dr. C. W. Bray Dr. A. J. Stosick Dr. L. A. DuBridge Dr. W. J. Sweeney Dr. Pol Duwez Dr. H. S. Tsien Dr. G. Gamow Dr. G. E. Valley Dr. I. A. Getting Dr. F. L. Wattendorf Dr. 1. P. Hammett Dr. F. Zwicky Dr. W. S. Hunter Dr. V. K. Zworykin Dr. I. P. Krick Colonel D. N. Yates Dr. D. P. MacDougall Colonel W. R. Lovelace II Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Air-To-Air Missiles
    The Market for Air-to-Air Missiles Product Code #F659 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Missile Forecast Analysis 4 The Market for Air-to-Air Missiles 2011-2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................6 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................8 Market Statistics .....................................................................................................................................................13 Table 1 - The Market for Air-to-Air Missiles Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020 ................................................19 Table 2 - The Market for Air-to-Air Missiles Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020.................................................23 Figure 1 - The Market for Air-to-Air Missiles Unit Production 2011 - 2020 (Bar Graph) ...............................................................................27 Figure 2 - The Market for Air-to-Air Missiles
    [Show full text]