A History of Rockets and Missiles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Rockets and Missiles A HISTORY OF ROCKETS AND MISSILES The guided missile is frequently termed a "new" method The most notable 19th century employment of rocketry of destruction. Certainly the massive airframes, the thun­ occurred during the War of 1812 when British forces at­ derous power plants and the elaborate guidance mecha­ tacked Fort McHenry with ship-launched rockets. A brief nisms of modern automatic weaponry are new. In the historical reference to this incident was preserved for pos­ broader sense, however, the concept of unmanned and self­ terity by Francis Scott Key in his masterwork, the Star­ propelled weaponry dates back more than two centuries Spangled Banner: before the astronomer Copernicus laid the foundation for "And the rockets' red glare, modern space cartography. The bombs bursting in air, The earliest authentic records tell us that in 1232 A.D. Gave proof through the night the Chinese used rocket missiles, or "arrows of flying fire," That our flag was still there." against the Mongols in the siege of a city named Kai­ fung-fu. About the same time, rockets were introduced in Europe, where they gained wide acceptance by the mili­ tary forces of various Middle Age belligerents. A rocket of a more advanced type was developed in India circa 17 80 and in the second M ysore war ( 1792) rockets were used to considerable advantage by troops of Tipu Sultan of Mysore against British forces under Lord Cornwallis in the battle of Seringapatam. At the turn of the 19th century a new development in propellants credited to Britain's Sir William Congreve gave the rocket a consid­ erably increased range capability and led to its wider use as an artillery weapon. 1 The guided missile, as opposed to the aimed rocket, carne into being in 1915 as the result of a cooperative program between the U. S. Navy and a private contractor. Known as an "aerial torpedo," the missi le flew a pre-set course. Later, radio control was used as guidance. During World War I, the Army sponsored a series of experiments with a radio-controlled pilotless ai rcraft known ~~~~~;~~~~-:: as the "Bug." Although successfully test flown, the Bug did not see war duty. It did, however, demonstrate the About 1830 . potential of radio-controlled missiles and started a chain an eleme , an Amencan named Wiu· of development work in that area which continued into nt of b. 'am u nozzle v sta illty to the rocket by p . qaJe added the thirties. anes h. rov1d· . next two dec w . Ich caused It to spin rapid! In~ It with In the period between World War I and World War II, "th ades, however, other ballistic y. Within the a good deal of research work was accomplished on power up wr great eng· . advances in the range and Ineers came plants for missiles, although most of it was aimed primarily ventiOnal arnr1 accura . ery. As a result, the popula . cy of con- at aircraft power. In addition to the piston engines used in declined and . nty of th In 1866 the last rocket arnJ e rocket the early radio-controlled missiles, there was the turbojet e Iernent of th A . 1 ery for e ustnan army, was disband d ce, an engine, developed during the thirties by Frank Whittle in The researches of Orville and Wilbur w/ · . Great Britain and Hans von Ohai n in Germany. years of the 20th f Ight In the first century were o · utmost · There was also the ramjet engine, first proposed and missilery Alth . Importance to · ough the Wnghts were not think· . patented in France as early as 1913. In the late twenties of automatic Weaponry when they built th . ,I,ng In terms and early thirties, experiments with ramjet power were con­ eir Flyer " the ducted in France and Hungary without success, largely due mernora ble first powered flight at Kitty Ba\"k t ' d • • ·v s arte a to lack of information about high-speed air flow. The first contmumg program of research and devel · . opment m aero- successful ramjet was developed in the United States by the dynamics and propulsion which later contributed in great Applied Physics Laboratory of Johns Hopkins University measure to missile progress. and test flown in 1945. 2 During the thirties, the Germans experimented wi th an­ he flew the world's first successful liquid rocket. The Ger­ other type of power, the pulsejet. This engine was perfected mans were conducting parallel liquid fuel research in the during World War II and it became the power plant for late twenties and made a successful flight in March, 1931. the V-1 "buzz bomb." The following year, a German army captain named Modern rocket research started in the late days of World Walter Dornberger (later a major general commanding the War I when Dr. Robert H . Goddard introduced a new and experimental mi ss il e test station at Peenemunde and now more powerful solid propellant than had previously been with an American aircraft and missile manufacturer) se­ available. During the thirties, several nations developed cured approval from the German government to develop liquid fuel weapons. In 1936, the famed "Peenemunde powerful solid-fuel artillery rockets which saw considerable use in World War Jl. Project" was organized and the Germans built a large rocket research establishment staffed for the most part by members Searching for still greater power, Dr. Goddard turned of the German Rocket Society. Of special interest was his attention toward liquid propellants, and in March, 1926, 3 the specification laid down by the German army and trans­ which unreeled from the "mother" aircraft as the mtssile mitted to Dr. Dornberger at the start of the German rocket sped on its way. program. A model of simplicity and directness, it read: "To On the Peenemunde drawing boards even at that early develop in military facilities a liquid fu el ro cket, the range date were such projects as submarine-launched missiles and of which should surpass that of any existing gun and pro­ boost-glide rocket bombers with very long range capability. duction of which wQuld be carried out by industry. Secrecy Although the Germans were concededly most advanced of the development is paramount." in missile development, they had no corner on the market Some of Peenemunde's products became frighteningly during World War 11. The Japanese experimented without well known during World War II, for instance, the "Ven­ much success with rocket glide bombs launched from the geance Weapons" : the V-1 buzz bomb and the deadly air and controlled by radio. The Japanese also developed V-2. Others, in various stages of development and test, were the rocket-powered gliding "baka bomb," controlled by the not as well known. best guidance system yet discovered: a human pilot. They included the Rheinbote, a surface-to-surface missile Although not as far advanced as Germany, the United with a smaller warhead and less range than the V-2; the States made some efforts toward developing guided weapons Wasserfall, a radio-controlled supersonic surface-to-air during World War II. As early as 1941, work was initiated missile; the Schmetterling, a subsonic surface-to-air weapon with a proximity fuse; the Enzian, a liquid-plus-solid booster rocket designed for use against bomber formations; and the X-4, an air-to-air missile which was controlled by signals from the launching plane transmitted through wires 4 on controllable bombs. In 1943, the Azon, a vertical bomb In 1946, the USAF started work on an intercontinental which could be controlled in azimuth (laterally) but not ballistic missile program known as MX-774, but this work in range, was placed in production. The Razon, controllable was terminated in the sweeping defense budget cuts of 1949. both in azimuth and range, was started in 1942 but not An aircraft company carried on the project on a study basis completed until the war's end. Both were Army Air Corps with its own funds. projects. Development by the Atomic Energy Commission of The Navy developed a glide torpedo which was used in lighter and less bulky atomic warheads gave impetus to the Pacific in the closing days of the war. America's long range missile program in the early 1950's. The Air Corps also developed an unmanned explosive­ At the same time, work was accelerated on a wide variety laden bomber guided by remote control, using war-weary of other missiles, offensive and defensive, with rocket, aircraft. The "Weary Willies" saw limited service in the turbojet and ramjet power plants. battle against Germany. Today, there are scores of active missile projects in Other wartime projects included advanced versions of various stages of progress, and we are drawing heavily upon the Razon, a guided jet-propelled flying~wing bomb, an missile data in the development of our infant space tech­ American version of the V-1, a radio-controlled ramjet nology. missile, several types of glide bombs, experiments in heat A study of guided missile history makes one point clear: and-light seeking missiles, and research in television control. this weapon emerged through an evolutionary, rather than Practically all of these projects were dropped at the end a revolutionary, process. It evolved slowly, over a long of the war. period of time. The development cycle accelerated rapidly In the postwar era, both the United States and the Soviet in the last two decades, and this acceleration was due in Union profited from research data accumulated by the large part to the wealth of information on aerodynamics, Germans in Peenemunde and other centers. The Soviets propulsion and guidance obtained through development of apparently concentrated from the start on long range bal­ the airplane.
Recommended publications
  • Prepared by Textore, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020
    AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES CAPABILITIES AND DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA Prepared by TextOre, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020 Printed in the United States of America by the China Aerospace Studies Institute ISBN 9798574996270 To request additional copies, please direct inquiries to Director, China Aerospace Studies Institute, Air University, 55 Lemay Plaza, Montgomery, AL 36112 All photos licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, or under the Fair Use Doctrine under Section 107 of the Copyright Act for nonprofit educational and noncommercial use. All other graphics created by or for China Aerospace Studies Institute Cover art is "J-10 fighter jet takes off for patrol mission," China Military Online 9 October 2018. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2018-10/09/content_9305984_3.htm E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.airuniversity.af.mil/CASI https://twitter.com/CASI_Research @CASI_Research https://www.facebook.com/CASI.Research.Org https://www.linkedin.com/company/11049011 Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, Intellectual Property, Patents, Patent Related Matters, Trademarks and Copyrights; this work is the property of the U.S. Government. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights Reproduction and printing is subject to the Copyright Act of 1976 and applicable treaties of the United States. This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This publication is provided for noncommercial use only.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning the Salvo Competition Rebalancing America’S Air and Missile Defenses
    WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK 2016 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2016 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mark Gunzinger is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Mr. Gunzinger has served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Forces Transformation and Resources. A retired Air Force Colonel and Command Pilot, he joined the Office of the Secretary of Defense in 2004. Mark was appointed to the Senior Executive Service and served as Principal Director of the Department’s central staff for the 2005–2006 Quadrennial Defense Review. Following the QDR, he served as Director for Defense Transformation, Force Planning and Resources on the National Security Council staff. Mr. Gunzinger holds an M.S. in National Security Strategy from the National War College, a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, a Master of Public Administration from Central Michigan University, and a B.S. in chemistry from the United States Air Force Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Missiles OUTLOOK
    SPECIFICATIONS Missiles OUTLOOK/ GENERAL DATA AIRFRAME GUIDANCE OUTLOOK/ POWERPLANT SPECIFICATIONS MAX. MAX. SPAN, BODY LAUNCH MAX. RANGE STATUS/OUTLOOK/REMARKS DESIGNATION/NAME LENGTH WINGS OR DIAMETER WEIGHT CONTRACTOR TYPE NO. MAKE & MODEL (FT.) FINS (FT.) (FT.) (LB.) (NAUT. MI.) AIR-TO-AIR CHUNG-SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CSIST), Taoyuan, Taiwan Skysword 1 (Tien Chien 1) 9.8 2.1 0.42 196.4 — IR 1 X solid propellant 9.7 In service with Taiwan air force since 1993. Skysword 2 (Tien Chien 2) 11.8 2 0.62 396.8 — Active radar 1 X solid propellant 32.4 In service with Taiwan air force since 1996. DENEL (PTY.) LTD., Pretoria, South Africa OPERATORS SATELLITE A-Darter 9.8 1.6 0.54 195.8 Denel IIR 1 X solid propellant — Fifth-generation technology demonstrator. Likely co-development with Brazil. COMMERCIAL R-Darter 11.9 2.1 0.53 264 Denel Radar 1 X solid propellant — Development completed 2000. For South African Air Force Cheetah and Gripen aircraft. U-Darter 9.6 1.67 0.42 210 Denel Two-color, IR 1 X solid propellant — First revealed in 1988; similar to Magic. Entered production in 1994. In use on South African Air Force Cheetah and Impala aircraft. DIEHL BGT DEFENSE, Uberlingen, Germany COMMERCIAL AIM-9L/I-1 Sidewinder 9.4 2.1 0.4 189 Diehl BGT Defense IR 1 X solid propellant — Upgraded and refurbished. IRIS-T 9.7 — 0.4 196 Diehl BGT Defense IIR 1 X solid propellant — In production. SATELLITE OPERATORS SATELLITE MBDA MISSILE SYSTEMS (BAE Systems, EADS, Finmeccanica), London, UK; Vélizy, France; Rome, Italy Aspide 12.1 3.4 0.67 479 Alenia Semiactive radar, homing 1 X solid propellant 43 In service.
    [Show full text]
  • EURASIA Russian Heavy Artillery
    EURASIA Russian Heavy Artillery: Leaving Depots and Returning to Service OE Watch Commentary: The Soviet Union developed large caliber artillery, such as the 2S4 ‘Tyulpan’ 240mm mortar and the 2S7 ‘Pion’ 203mm howitzer, to suppress lines of communication, destroy enemy headquarters, tactical nuclear weapons, logistic areas, and other important targets and to destroy urban areas and field fortifications. After the end of the Cold War, the Russian Federation placed most of these large caliber artillery systems into long-term storage depots for several reasons. The first is that they were intended to deliver nuclear, as well as conventional, munitions (the end of the Cold War meant that a long-range tactical nuclear weapon delivery was no longer needed). Another reason is that better tube (2S19M Msta-SM) and missile (MLRS/SRBM/GLCM) systems, such as new 300mm MLRS platforms, the Iskander missile system, and the 2S19M Msta-SM 152mm howitzer, allow Russia to fulfill many of the same tasks as large caliber artillery to varying degrees. The 2S4 ‘Tyulpan’ self-propelled mortar is equipped with a 240mm 2B8 mortar mounted on a modified Object 123 tracked chassis (similar to the 2S3 Akatsiya self-propelled howitzer) with a V-59 V-12, 520 horsepower diesel engine, capable of 60 km/h road speed. The Tyulpan has a crew of four, but five additional crewman are carried in the support vehicle that typically accompanies it. The system is capable of firing conventional, chemical, and nuclear munitions at a rate of one round per minute, although Russia reportedly now only has conventional munitions in service.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK
    Occasional Paper No. 2 A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK Joseph S. Bermudez Jr. Monitoring Proliferation Threats Project MONTEREY INSTITUTE CENTER FOR NONPROLIFERATION STUDIES OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES THE CENTER FOR NONPROLIFERATION STUDIES The Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) at the Monterey Institute of International Studies (MIIS) is the largest non-governmental organization in the United States devoted exclusively to research and training on nonproliferation issues. Dr. William C. Potter is the director of CNS, which has a staff of more than 50 full- time personnel and 65 student research assistants, with offices in Monterey, CA; Washington, DC; and Almaty, Kazakhstan. The mission of CNS is to combat the spread of weapons of mass destruction by training the next generation of nonproliferation specialists and disseminating timely information and analysis. For more information on the projects and publications of CNS, contact: Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies 425 Van Buren Street Monterey, California 93940 USA Tel: 831.647.4154 Fax: 831.647.3519 E-mail: [email protected] Internet Web Site: http://cns.miis.edu CNS Publications Staff Editor Jeffrey W. Knopf Managing Editor Sarah J. Diehl Copyright © Joseph S. Bermudez Jr., 1999. OCCASIONAL PAPERS AVAILABLE FROM CNS: No. 1 Former Soviet Biological Weapons Facilities in Kazakhstan: Past, Present, and Future, by Gulbarshyn Bozheyeva, Yerlan Kunakbayev, and Dastan Yeleukenov, June 1999 No. 2 A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK, by Joseph S. Bermudez Jr., November 1999 No. 3 Nonproliferation Regimes at Risk, Michael Barletta and Amy Sands, eds., November 1999 Please contact: Managing Editor Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies 425 Van Buren Street Monterey, California 93940 USA Tel: 831.647.3596 Fax: 831.647.6534 A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK [Note: Page numbers given do not correctly match pages in this PDF version.] Contents Foreword ii by Timothy V.
    [Show full text]
  • Phillip Saunders Testimony
    Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on China’s Nucle ar Force s June 10, 2021 Phillip C. Saunders Director, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute of National Strategic Studies, National Defense University The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. government. Introduction The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is in the midst of an ambitious strategic modernization that will transform its nuclear arsenal from a limited ground-based nuclear force intended to provide an assured second strike after a nuclear attack into a much larger, technologically advanced, and diverse nuclear triad that will provide PRC leaders with new strategic options. China also fields an increasing number of dual-capable medium and intermediate-range ballistic missiles whose status within a future regional crisis or conflict may be unclear, potentially casting a nuclear shadow over U.S. and allied military operations. In addition to more accurate and more survivable delivery systems, this modernization includes improvements to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3) and strategic intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems that will provide PRC leaders with greater situational awareness in a crisis or conflict. These systems will also support development of ballistic missile defenses (BMD) and enable possible shifts in PRC nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Air-Directed Surface-To-Air Missile Study Methodology
    H. T. KAUDERER Air-Directed Surface-to-Air Missile Study Methodology H. Todd Kauderer During June 1995 through September 1998, APL conducted a series of Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercises (WALEXs) in support of the Naval Air Systems Command. The goal of these exercises was to examine a concept then known as the Air-Directed Surface-to-Air Missile (ADSAM) System in support of Navy Overland Cruise Missile Defense. A team of analysts and engineers from APL and elsewhere was assembled to develop a high-fidelity, physics-based engineering modeling process suitable for understanding and assessing the performance of both individual systems and a “system of systems.” Results of the initial ADSAM Study effort served as the basis for a series of WALEXs involving senior Flag and General Officers and were subsequently presented to the (then) Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology. (Keywords: ADSAM, Cruise missiles, Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense, Modeling and simulation, Overland Cruise Missile Defense.) INTRODUCTION In June 1995 the Naval Air Systems Command • Developing an analytical methodology that tied to- (NAVAIR) asked APL to examine the Air-Directed gether a series of previously distinct, “stovepiped” Surface-to-Air Missile (ADSAM) System concept for high-fidelity engineering models into an integrated their Overland Cruise Missile Defense (OCMD) doc- system that allowed the detailed analysis of a “system trine. NAVAIR was concerned that a number of impor- of systems” tant air defense–related decisions were being made
    [Show full text]
  • PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, and the V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ENGINEERING CONSENT: PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND THE V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael Brian Petersen, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005 Dissertation Directed By: Professor Jeffrey Herf Departmen t of History This dissertation is the story of the German scientists and engineers who developed, tested, and produced the V-2 missile, the world’s first liquid -fueled ballistic missile. It examines the social, political, and cultural roots of the prog ram in the Weimar Republic, the professional world of the Peenemünde missile base, and the results of the specialists’ decision to use concentration camp slave labor to produce the missile. Previous studies of this subject have been the domain of either of sensationalistic journalists or the unabashed admirers of the German missile pioneers. Only rarely have historians ventured into this area of inquiry, fruitfully examining the history of the German missile program from the top down while noting its admi nistrative battles and technical development. However, this work has been done at the expense of a detailed examination of the mid and lower -level employees who formed the backbone of the research and production effort. This work addresses that shortcomi ng by investigating the daily lives of these employees and the social, cultural, and political environment in which they existed. It focuses on the key questions of dedication, motivation, and criminality in the Nazi regime by asking “How did Nazi authori ties in charge of the missile program enlist the support of their employees in their effort?” “How did their work translate into political consent for the regime?” “How did these employees come to view slave labor as a viable option for completing their work?” This study is informed by traditions in European intellectual and social history while borrowing from different methods of sociology and anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft Guidance Techniques for Maximizing Mission Success
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2014 Spacecraft Guidance Techniques for Maximizing Mission Success Shane B. Robinson Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, Shane B., "Spacecraft Guidance Techniques for Maximizing Mission Success" (2014). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 2175. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2175 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPACECRAFT GUIDANCE TECHNIQUES FOR MAXIMIZING MISSION SUCCESS by Shane B. Robinson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Mechanical Engineering Approved: Dr. David K. Geller Dr. Jacob H. Gunther Major Professor Committee Member Dr. Warren F. Phillips Dr. Charles M. Swenson Committee Member Committee Member Dr. Stephen A. Whitmore Dr. Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2013 [This page intentionally left blank] iii Copyright c Shane B. Robinson 2013 All Rights Reserved [This page intentionally left blank] v Abstract Spacecraft Guidance Techniques for Maximizing Mission Success by Shane B. Robinson, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2013 Major Professor: Dr. David K. Geller Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Traditional spacecraft guidance techniques have the objective of deterministically min- imizing fuel consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Warsaw Pact Ammunition Handbook, Vol 3
    NATO Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre of Excellence FORMER WARSAW PACT AMMUNITION HANDBOOK VOLUME 3 Air Forces Ammunition Aerial projectiles, bombs, rockets and missiles TRENČÍN 2019 Slovak Republic For Official Use Only Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre of Excellence FORMER WARSAW PACT AMMUNITION HANDBOOK VOLUME 3 Air Forces Ammunition Aerial projectiles, bombs, rockets and missiles For Official Use Only Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre of Excellence The NATO Explosive Ordnance Centre of Excellence (NATO EOD COE) supports the efforts of the Alliance in the areas of training and education, information sharing, doctrine development and concepts validation. Published by NATO EOD Centre of Excellence Ivana Olbrachta 5, 911 01,Trenčín, Slovak Republic Tel. + 421 960 333 502, Fax + 421 960 333 504 www.eodcoe.org Former Warsaw Pact Ammunition Handbook VOL 3 – Edition II. ISBN 978-80-89261-81-9 © EOD Centre of Excellence. All rights reserved 2019 No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the publisher, except in the case brief quotations embodied in articles and reviews. For Official Use Only Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre of Excellence Foreword Even though in areas of current NATO operations the insurgency is vastly using the Home Made Explosive as the main charge for emplaced IEDs, our EOD troops have to cope with the use of the conventional munition in any form and size all around the world. To assist in saving EOD Operators’ lives and to improve their effectiveness at munition disposal, it is essential to possess the adequate level of experience and knowledge about the respective type of munition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army's New Multiple Rocket Launcher-A Shining Example of A
    The Army's New Multiple Rocket Launcher-A Shining Example of a Weapon That Works The military forces of the United States and its NATO partners have no hope nor intention of matching the Warsaw Pact gun-for-gun or tank­ for-tank. Instead we and our allies plan to rely from the onset of hostil­ ities in Europe on tactics and weapons which would blunt the initial attack and deliver a knockout blow to the Soviet second echelon forces before they could exploit any initial success. To give our Army the wherewithal to fight a numerically superior foe­ and win, we have organized and trained balanced ground fighting forces capable of successful combat against any army in the world. Of equal import, we are providing our soldiers with the weap­ ons and equipment to exhibit a credi­ ble deterrence to war-armaments like the M1 Abrams tank and its compan­ ion, the Bradley infantry fighting ve­ hicle, the AH-64 Apache attack heli­ copter and the UH -60 utility helicopter. In addition the Army is quietly field­ ing another new system that could provide the firepower edge our sol­ diers need. That weapon is the Multi­ ple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), and it is described by the general in charge of Army research and develop­ ment as "the best piece of equipment that we have fielded for close support of the battlefield since World War II." The MLRS is a highly reliable, ex­ tremely accurate field artillery rocket system with which three soldiers can deliver the volume of firepower that would normally require nearly a bat­ talion of heavy artillery.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Commercial Aviation Against the Shoulder-Fired Missile
    INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. This product is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, a conference summary, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers
    [Show full text]