Environmental Report for the Site Development Plan 2019 for the German Baltic Sea - Unofficial Translation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Report for the Site Development Plan 2019 for the German Baltic Sea - Unofficial Translation Environmental Report for the Site Development Plan 2019 for the German Baltic Sea - unofficial translation - Hamburg, June 28th, 2019 © Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie Hamburg und Rostock 2019 BSH-No. 7608 All Rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the BSH. Photos: BSH, Miriam Müller Content I Content 1 Introduction 15 1.1 Legal basis and tasks of the environmental assessment 15 1.2 Brief description of the content and most important objectives of the Site Development Plan 16 1.3 Tiered planning procedures – relationship to other relevant plans, programmes and projects (environmental assessment at the appropriate planning level) 18 1.3.1 Introduction 18 1.3.2 Maritime spatial planning (EEZ) 22 1.3.3 Land development plan 23 1.3.4 Site investigation 25 1.3.5 Approval procedure (planning approval and planning permission procedure) for offshore wind turbines 26 1.3.6 Approval procedure for grid connections (converter platforms and submarine cable systems) 27 1.3.7 Interconnectors 28 1.3.8 Summary overviews of environmental assessments 29 1.4 Presentation and consideration of environmental protection objectives 36 1.4.1 International conventions on the protection of the marine environment 36 1.4.2 Environmental and nature conservation requirements at EU level 39 1.4.3 Environmental and nature conservation requirements at national level 42 1.4.4 The Federal Government's energy and climate conservation aims 44 1.5 Strategic Environmental Assessment methodology 46 1.5.1 Introduction 46 1.5.2 Area of investigation 47 1.5.3 Carrying out the environmental assessment 48 1.5.4 Criteria for status description and assessment 51 1.5.5 Specific assumptions for assessment of likely significant environmental effects 56 1.5.6 Fundamentals of the assessment of alternatives 61 II Content 1.6 Data sources and indications of difficulties in compiling the documents 62 1.6.1 Overview of data source 63 1.6.2 Indications of difficulties in compiling the documents 63 2 Description and assessment of state of the environment 66 2.1 Introduction 66 2.2 Soil/Area 66 2.2.1 Protected asset Land 66 2.2.2 Data availability 66 2.2.3 Geomorphology 66 2.2.4 Sediment distribution on the seabed 67 2.2.5 Geological structure of the near-surface subsoil 67 2.2.6 Distribution of pollutants in the sediment 70 2.2.7 Status estimation 71 2.3 Water 74 2.3.1 Currents 74 2.3.2 Swell and water level fluctuations 76 2.3.3 Surface temperature and temperature stratification 76 2.3.4 Surface salinity and salinity stratification 77 2.3.5 Ice conditions 79 2.3.6 Suspended matter and turbidity 80 2.3.7 Status assessment with regard to nutrient and pollutant distribution 81 2.4 Plankton 85 2.4.1 Data availability and monitoring programmes 85 2.4.2 Spatial distribution and temporal variability of phytoplankton 86 2.4.3 Spatial distribution and temporal variability of zooplankton 88 2.4.4 Status assessment of plankton 91 2.5 Biotopes 96 2.5.1 Data availability 96 2.5.2 Biotopes in the German Baltic Sea 97 2.5.3 Legally protected marine biotopes according to section 30 of the Federal Nature Conservation Act and FFH habitat types 98 Content III 2.5.4 Status estimation 101 2.6 Benthos 102 2.6.1 Data availability 103 2.6.2 Spatial distribution and temporal variability 103 2.6.3 Status assessment of the factor Benthos 115 2.7 Fish 120 2.7.1 Data availability 122 2.7.2 Spatial distribution and temporal variability 122 2.7.3 Status assessment of the factor Fish 126 2.8 Marine mammals 135 2.8.1 Data availability 135 2.8.2 Spatial distribution and temporal variability 136 2.8.3 Status assessment of the factor Marine mammals 142 2.9 Seabirds and resting birds 147 2.9.1 Data availability 148 2.9.2 Spatial distribution and temporal variability 148 2.9.3 Status assessment of seabirds and resting birds 156 2.10 Migratory birds 160 2.10.1 Data availability 160 2.10.2 Spatial distribution and temporal variability of migratory birds 161 2.10.3 Status assessment of the factor Migratory birds 177 2.11 Bats and bat migration 186 2.11.1 Data availability 187 2.11.2 Migration and migratory movements of bats over the Baltic Sea 187 2.11.3 Conservation status of potentially migratory bat species in countries adjacent to the Baltic Sea 190 2.11.4 Hazards to bats 192 2.12 Biodiversity 192 2.13 Air 193 2.14 Climate 193 2.15 Scenery 194 2.16 Cultural heritage and other material assets 194 IV Content 2.17 Human beings, including human health 194 2.18 Interrelationships between the factors 195 3 Likely evolution without implementation of the plan 197 3.1 Soil/Area 198 3.2 Water 199 3.3 Plankton 199 3.4 Biotopes 200 3.5 Benthos 200 3.6 Fish 201 3.7 Marine mammals 202 3.8 Seabirds and resting birds 202 3.9 Migratory birds 202 3.10 Bats and bat migration 203 3.11 Biodiversity 203 3.12 Air 204 3.13 Climate 204 3.14 Scenery 204 3.15 Cultural heritage and other material assets 205 3.16 Human beings, including human health 206 3.17 Interrelationships between the factors 206 4 Description and assessment of the likely significant effects of the implementation of the Site Development Plan on the marine environment 207 4.1 Soil/Area 207 4.1.1 Areas, sites and platforms 207 4.1.2 Submarine cabling systems 209 4.2 Benthos 212 4.2.1 Areas and sites 212 4.2.2 Platforms 213 4.2.3 Submarine cabling systems 214 4.3 Biotopes 217 4.3.1 Areas and sites 217 Content V 4.3.2 Platforms 217 4.3.3 Submarine cabling systems 218 4.4 Fish 218 4.4.1 Areas and sites 218 4.4.2 Platforms 219 4.4.3 Submarine cabling systems 221 4.5 Marine mammals 222 4.5.1 Areas, sites and platforms 222 4.5.2 Submarine cabling systems 227 4.6 Seabirds and resting birds 228 4.6.1 Areas and sites 228 4.6.2 Platforms 230 4.6.3 Submarine cabling systems 230 4.7 Migratory birds 231 4.7.1 Areas and sites 232 4.7.2 Platforms 235 4.7.3 Submarine cabling systems 235 4.8 Bats and bat migration 236 4.8.1 Areas and sites 236 4.8.2 Platforms 236 4.8.3 Submarine cabling systems 236 4.9 Climate 236 4.10 Scenery 237 4.10.1 Areas and sites 237 4.10.2 Platforms 237 4.11 Interdependency 237 4.12 Cumulative effects 239 4.12.1 Soil/Area, benthos and biotopes 239 4.12.2 Fish 241 4.12.3 Marine mammals 241 4.12.4 Seabirds and resting birds 242 4.12.5 Migratory birds 243 VI Content 4.13 Transboundary impacts 247 5 Assessment of wildlife conservation regulations 248 5.1 Marine mammals 248 5.1.1 Section 44 subsection 1 no. 1 of the Federal Nature Conservation Act (prohibition of injury and killing) 248 5.1.2 Section 44 subsection 1 no. 2 of the Federal Nature Conservation Act (prohibition of disturbance) 250 5.2 Avifauna (seabirds, resting birds and migratory birds) 255 5.2.1 Section 44 subsection 1 no. 1 of the Federal Nature Conservation Act (prohibition of injury and killing) 256 5.2.2 Section 44 subsection 1 no. 2 of the Federal Nature Conservation Act (prohibition of disturbance) 257 5.3 Bats 259 5.3.1 Section 44 subsection 1 no. 1 and no. 2 of the Federal Nature Conservation Act 259 6 Assessment of the implications 260 6.1 Legal basis 260 6.2 Impact assessment of the Site Development Plan with respect to the habitat types 262 6.2.1 Assessment of implications with the conservation objective of the nature conservation area "Pomeranian Bight – Rönnebank" 262 6.2.2 Impact assessment of planned cable routes on the conservation objective of the nature conservation area "Fehmarn Belt" 263 6.3 Impact assessment of the Site Development Plan for protected species 263 6.3.1 Impact assessment of areas, sites and submarine cable systems on the conservation objective of the "Pomeranian Bight – Rönnebank" nature conservation area 263 6.3.2 Impact assessment of areas, sites, platforms and submarine cable systems on the conservation objective of the "Fehmarn Belt" nature conservation area 266 6.3.3 Impact assessment of areas, sites, platforms and submarine cable systems on the conservation objective of the "Kadetrinne" nature conservation area 267 6.4 Natura 2000 areas outside the German EEZs 268 6.5 Results of the assessment of the implications 270 Content VII 7 Overall plan evaluation 271 8 Measures to prevent, mitigate and offset significant negative effects of the Site Development Plan on the marine environment 272 8.1 Introduction 272 8.2 Areas and sites for offshore wind turbines 273 8.3 Platforms 274 8.4 Submarine cabling systems 276 9 Investigated alternatives 277 9.1 Zero alternative 277 9.2 Strategic alternatives 278 9.3 Spatial alternatives 278 9.3.1 Examination of alternatives for areas 279 9.3.2 Comparison of the sites with one another 280 9.4 Technical alternatives 285 10 Measures envisaged for monitoring the environmental impacts 287 10.1 Monitoring of potential effects of areas and sites for offshore wind turbines 289 10.2 Monitoring of potential effects of platforms 290 10.3 Monitoring of the potential effects of submarine cables 290 11 Non-technical summary 292 12 References 309 VIII Content List of figures Abbildung 1: Übersicht zum gestuften Planungs- und Zulassungsprozess im zentralen Modell.
Recommended publications
  • Norway Pout, Sandeel and North Sea Sprat
    FINAL REPORT Initial assessment of the Norway sandeel, pout and North Sea sprat fishery Norges Fiskarlag Report No.: 2017-008, Rev 3 Date: January 2nd 2018 Certificate code: 251453-2017-AQ-NOR-ASI Report type: Final Report DNV GL – Business Assurance Report title: Initial assessment of the Norway sandeel, pout and North Sea sprat fishery DNV GL Business Assurance Customer: Norges Fiskarlag, Pirsenteret, Norway AS 7462 TRONDHEIM Veritasveien 1 Contact person: Tor Bjørklund Larsen 1322 HØVIK, Norway Date of issue: January 2nd 2018 Tel: +47 67 57 99 00 Project No.: PRJC -557210 -2016 -MSC -NOR http://www.dnvgl.com Organisation unit: ZNONO418 Report No.: 2017-008, Rev 3 Certificate No.: 251453-2017-AQ-NOR-ASI Objective: Assessment of the Norway sandeel, pout and North Sea sprat fishery against MSC Fisheries Standards v2.0. Prepared by: Verified by: Lucia Revenga Sigrun Bekkevold Team Leader and P2 Expert Principle Consultant Hans Lassen P1 Expert Geir Hønneland P3 Expert Stefan Midteide Project Manager Copyright © DNV GL 2014. All rights reserved. This publication or parts thereof may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, whether digitally or otherwise without the prior written consent of DNV GL. DNV GL and the Horizon Graphic are trademarks of DNV GL AS. The content of this publication shall be kept confidential by the customer, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Reference to part of this publication which may lead to misinterpretation is prohibited. DNV GL Distribution: ☒ Unrestricted distribution (internal and external) ☐ Unrestricted distribution within DNV GL ☐ Limited distribution within DNV GL after 3 years ☐ No distribution (confidential) ☐ Secret Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Time and Tide Bell Community Interest Company The
    To bid, visit #200Fish www.bit.ly/200FishAuction Art inspired by each species of fish found in the North Sea : mail - il,com Auction The At the exhibition and by e and exhibition At the biffvernon@gma Lincolnshire Time and Tide Bell Community Interest Company Bidding is open now by e-mail and at the gallery during the exhibition’s opening hours. Bidding ends 6 pm Monday 3rd September 2018 The #200Fish Auction Thanks to the many artists who have so generously donated their works to the Lincolnshire Time and Tide Bell Community Interest Company to raise funds for our future art and environmental projects, we are selling some of the artworks in the #200Fish exhibition by auction. Here’s how it works. Take a look through this catalogue and if you would like to buy a piece send us an email giving the Fish Number and how much you are willing to pay. Or if you visit the North Sea Observatory during the exhibition, 23rd August to 3rd September, you can hand in your bid on paper. Along with your bid amount, please include your e-mail address and postal address. After the auction closes, at 6pm Monday 3rd September 2018, the person who has bid the highest price wins and we’ll send you an e-mail. Sold works can be collected from the gallery on Tuesday the 4th or from my house in North Somercotes any time later. We can post them to you but will charge whatever it costs us. Bear in mind that the images displayed here are a bit rubbish, just low resolution versions of snapshots as often as not taken on a camera phone rather than in a professional art photo studio.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions
    THE LONDON RESORT PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions WATER QUALITY 13.2.1. The principal water quality data sources that have been used to inform this study are: • Environment Agency (EA) WFD classification status and reporting (e.g. EA 2015); and • EA long-term water quality monitoring data for the tidal Thames. Environment Agency WFD Classification Status 13.2.2. The tidal River Thames is divided into three transitional water bodies as part of the Thames River Basin Management Plan (EA 2015) (Thames Upper [ID GB530603911403], Thames Middle [ID GB53060391140] and Thames Lower [ID GB530603911401]. Each of these waterbodies are classified as heavily modified waterbodies (HMWBs). The most recent EA assessment carried out in 2016, confirms that all three of these water bodies are classified as being at Moderate ecological potential (EA 2018). 13.2.3. The Thames Estuary at the London Resort Project Site is located within the Thames Middle Transitional water body, which is a heavily modified water body on account of the following designated uses (Cycle 2 2015-2021): • Coastal protection; • Flood protection; and • Navigation. 13.2.4. The downstream extent of the Thames Middle transitional water body is located approximately 12 km downstream of the Kent Project Site and 8 km downstream of the Essex Project Site near Lower Hope Point. Downstream of this location is the Thames Lower water body which extends to the outer Thames Estuary. 13.2.5. A summary of the current Thames Middle water body WFD status is presented in Table A13.2.1, together with those supporting elements that do not currently meet at least Good status and their associated objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Horns Rev and Nysted Offshore Wind Farms Environmental Impact Assessment and Monitoring
    Review report 2004 The Danish Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Project: Horns Rev and Nysted Offshore Wind Farms Environmental impact assessment and monitoring Prepared for The Environmental Group By Elsam Engineering and ENERGI E2 October 2005 - 1 - Review Report 2004 The Danish Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Project: Horns Rev and Nysted Offshore Wind Farm Environmental impact assessment and monitoring Report prepared by: ENERGI E2 A/S Teglholmen A.C. Meyers Vænge 9 DK-2450 København SV Contact: Charlotte Boesen Telephone: +45 4480 6000 Telefax: +45 4480 6604 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.e2.dk Elsam Engineering A/S Kraftværksvej 53 DK-7000 Fredericia Contact: Jette Kjær Telephone: +45 7923 3187 Telefax: +45 7556 4477 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.elsam-eng.com Report prepared for: The environmental Committee of the Danish Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Projects Information note! Environmental studies are to be carried out at Nysted and Horns Rev during the period 1999-2006 under the terms of permission to wind farm construction at the two sites, granted by the Danish authorities. The installation of wind turbines was finished in the autumn of 2002 (Horns Rev) and the summer of 2003 (Nysted). Hence, the annual status reports for 2004 represent data from just more than a year after the initial commissioning of the wind farms. Thus, natural variation between years, seasons, species and sites and the possible habituation effects during the operational phase cannot be fully considered. The results in all individual annual status reports from our consultants are to be considered as preliminary and must await the final compilation of data in 2005 before firm conclusions can be drawn with respect to impact on the biological environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.19 Marine Ecology
    19 Marine Ecology 19 MARINE ECOLOGY 19.1 Introduction 19.1.1 This Chapter assesses the potential impacts of the construction and operational phases of the proposed Hinkley Point C Power Station on marine ecosystems at Hinkley Point and, where appropriate, the wider Bridgwater Bay and Severn Estuary environment. 19.2 Scope of Assessment 19.2.1 The assessment of the potential impacts has been undertaken in accordance with the methods outlined in Chapter 4, Volume 2. Available published data and grey literature have been examined which includes data derived from ongoing impingement and entrainment sampling at the current HPB Station intake screens. To secure the marine science base to support consideration of this development, both in terms of environmental assessment and appropriate engineering design, a range of investigations were instigated by British Energy under the umbrella of the British Energy Estuarine and Marine Studies (BEEMS) process, now adopted by EDF. These surveys were designed to gather baseline data across appropriate temporal and spatial scales for the key ecological components of the surrounding ecosystems. 19.2.2 The geographical extent of the area of interest for the marine ecological assessment is dependent upon the particular organism, its habits, and the type of impact considered critical for it. 19.2.3 The extent of dedicated survey and assessment effort is also dependent upon an understanding of the highly dynamic physical processes that govern the ecology of the Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel (see Chapter 16). 19.2.4 The site for the proposed HPC Station is located within and adjacent to a number of international and national conservation designations that cover a range of marine ecological interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Balticconnector – Environmental Impact
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT BALTICCONNECTOR — ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 2015 REPORT ASSESSMENT IMPACT — ENVIRONMENTAL BALTICCONNECTOR BALTICCONNECTOR Natural gas pipeline between Finland and Estonia 2015 Environmental impact assessment report Estonia ESTONIA BALTICCONNECTOR — ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT CONTACT INFORMATION Project Developers: Gasum Corporation Eero Isoranta Phone: +358 20 447 8652 [email protected] www.gasum.com AS EG Võrguteenus Priit Heinla Phone: +372 617 0028 [email protected] www.egvorguteenus.ee Coordinating authority for the EIA procedure in Estonia: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications Taivo Linnamägi Phone: +372 62 56 342 [email protected] Coordinating authority for the EIA procedure in Finland: Uusimaa Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment Leena Eerola Phone: +358 295 021 380 [email protected] EIA consultant: Pöyry Finland Oy Terhi Rauhamäki Phone: +358 10 33 21420 [email protected] Entec Eesti OÜ Andres Piirsalu Phone: +372 50 19662 [email protected] Published by: Gasum Corporation Layout and design: Kreab Base map data: © Maanmittauslaitos, Lupanro 48/MML/14, Estonian Land Board Base Map ETAK (agreement No EP-B2–2713) Cover photo: Ramboll The EIA report and related material are available online at http://www.balticconnector.fi and at http://www.egvorguteenus.ee/kasulikku/balticconnector/ The project’s EIA report for Finland is available in English at http://www.balticconnector.fi 2 BALTICCONNECTOR — ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOREWORD Gasum Corporation (hereinafter Gasum) and the Esto- negative impacts caused by alternatives of proposed nian company AS EG Võrguteenus are jointly planning activity in Estonia and Finland. The EIA procedure the Balticconnector natural gas pipeline to intercon- covers the natural gas pipeline route from Ingå, Finland, nect the Finnish and Estonian natural gas distribution to Paldiski, Estonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment of Estonian Marine Strategy`S Programme of Measures to Achieve and Maintain Good Environmental Status of Estonian Marine Area
    Strategic Environmental Assessment of Estonian Marine Strategy`s Programme of Measures to achieve and maintain Good Environmental Status of Estonian marine area Draft report (12.10.2015) Client: OÜ Eesti Keskkonnauuringute Keskus Prepared by: Tallinna Tehnikaülikooli Meresüsteemide Instituut (Marine Systems Institute at Tallinn University of Technology) OÜ Alkranel Head of SEA working group: Alar Noorvee Tartu-Tallinn 2015 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 5 1. PROGRAMME OF MEASURES AND ITS LIST OF NEW MEASURES ............................................ 7 2. OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SITUATION, PROBLEMS AND PRESSURES ............................. 9 2.1 Overview of the natural environment .............................................................................................. 9 2.1.1 Bathymetry, characteristics of seafloor and coast ...................................................................... 9 2.1.2 Temperature, salinity, stratification, ice cover ......................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Currents, wave regime and sea level ........................................................................................ 12 2.1.4 Nutrients and oxygen .............................................................................................................. 14 Plankton .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Changing Oceanography in the Dove Time Series: a Northumberland Plankton Community Study
    Response to Changing Oceanography in the Dove Time Series: a Northumberland Plankton Community Study Malcolm Charles Baptie Submitted for Doctor of Philosophy School of Marine Science and Technology November 2013 Abstract The Dove Time Series is a plankton monitoring station in the Northumberland coastal sea which has been sampled since 1969. Over the 20th century, major changes have occurred in the North Sea plankton which have in part correlated with oscillation in atmospheric mass over the Northern Hemisphere, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Westerly winds when the NAO is positive phase block northern low pressure systems and transport warm Atlantic water into the North Sea extending stratification, leading to greater phytoplankton biomass. Phytoplankton biomass in the central North Sea reached a sustained higher level after 1985. Phytoplankton, zooplankton and ichthyoplankton datasets were created or extended from the Dove Time Series to study the effect of oceanographic change at this location. There was a change to a high abundance community 10 years later, in 1995. The most important predictor of phytoplankton abundance was not the NAO index, but the Atlantic Meridional Oscillation (AMO), which exhibits 60-100 year and subordinate 11 and 14 year periodicity, describing a deviation from the long term sea surface temperature (SST) mean in the North Atlantic. Phytoplankton periodicity partly matched the 14 year period in the AMO, which correlates with a feedback mechanism of westerly versus northerly wind in the North Atlantic, regulating ocean-atmosphere heat flux. Zooplankton abundance was predicted by SST and ratio of maximum to minimum abundance by phytoplankton/AMO. Oceanographic conditions that were contemporary with the state of the AMO anomaly after 1995 promoted higher spring phytoplankton abundance and neritic copepod abundance peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Parasite Component Communities in Brackish Water fishes of the Northeastern Baltic Sea
    471 The structure of parasite component communities in brackish water fishes of the northeastern Baltic Sea E.T.VALTONEN"*, K.PULKKINEN", R.POULIN# and M.JULKUNEN" " Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of JyvaW skylaW , 40100 JyvaW skylaW , Finland # Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand (Received 12 June 2000; revised 19 September 2000; accepted 12 October 2000) We used nestedness analysis to seek non-random patterns in the structure of component communities of metazoan parasites collected from 31 sympatric fish species from the northeastern Bothnian Bay, the most oligohaline area of the Baltic Sea. Only 8 marine parasite species were found among the 63 species recorded, although some marine fish species reproduce in the bay and others occasionally visit the area. Marine parasite species can utilize both freshwater and marine fish species as intermediate or final hosts, and marine fish can harbour freshwater parasite species. This exchange of parasite species between marine and freshwater fish has probably resulted from ecological factors acting over short time scales rather than from evolutionary processes acting over longer time; the key factor probably being the immediate presence of suitable intermediate and definitive hosts. Marine fish were expected to harbour species-poor parasite communities consisting mainly of generalists acquired from the sympatric freshwater fish species, which would result in a nested pattern among the different component communities. However, an anti-nested pattern was found in the component communities of metazoan parasites of fishes from the Bothnian Bay. A likely explanation for the observed pattern is that there are specialist parasite species, the majority of which are cestodes, in some of the freshwater fish species which otherwise have depauperate parasite communities.
    [Show full text]
  • MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION Wash Brown Shrimp
    Lloyd’s Register Public Comment Draft Report Wash brown shrimp Lloyd’s Register 6 Redheughs Rigg South Gyle Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ United Kingdom MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATIONT +44 (0)13 1335 6600 E [email protected] www.lr.org Wash brown shrimp Public Comment Draft Report September 2019 Client: Shrimp Producers Organisation Ltd. Assessment Conducted by: Tristan Southall, Gudrun Gaudian, Julian Addison On behalf of Lloyd’s Register QP07 MSC 1-FA Full Assessment Template 2.0 LR 20180517 Lloyd’s Register Public Comment Draft Report Wash brown shrimp Assessment Data Sheet CAB details Lloyd’s Register Address 6 Redheughs Rigg Edinburgh EH12 9DQ Phone/Fax 0131 335 6662 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Polly Burns Client details Shrimp Producers Organisation Ltd. Address Alexandra Dock, King's Lynn, Norfolk, PE30 2ET Phone/Fax 07980 591631 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) David Guy Assessment Team Team Leader & P3 Assessor Tristan Southall P2 Assessor Gudrun Gaudian P1 Assessor Julian Addison Page 2 of 217 QP07 MSC 1-FA Full Assessment Template 2.0 LR 20180517 www.lr.org Lloyd’s Register Public Comment Draft Report Wash brown shrimp Contents Assessment Data Sheet ........................................................................................................ 2 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 8 2 Authorship and Peer Reviewers ................................................................................... 11 Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Rich Reefs in the North Sea
    Rich Reefs in the North Sea Exploring the possibilities of promoting the establishment of natural reefs and colonisation of artificial hard substrate Rich Reefs in the North Sea Exploring the possibilities of promoting the establishment of natural reefs and colonisation of artificial hard substrate dr. L.A. van Duren dr. A. Gittenberger prof. dr. A.C. Smaal dr. ir. M. van Koningsveld dr. R. Osinga J.A. Cado van der Lelij, MSc. M.B. de Vries, MSc. 1221293-000 © Deltares, 2017, B Title Rich Reefs in the North Sea Client Project Reference Pages dr. E. Knegtering, Ministry of 1221293-000 1221293-000-ZKS-0013 83 Economic Affairs Keywords North Sea; hard substrate; reefs; building with North Sea nature; biodiversity Summary This project, carried out on the instructions of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, is a preliminary study aiming to give an overview of possibilities and knowledge gaps pertaining to hard substrate in relation to ecological added value. It intends to provide input for the national policy on “Building with North Sea Nature”, which aims to bolster the conservation and sustainable use of species and habitats native to the Dutch section of the North Sea. As a result of various human activities, past and present, the North Sea is currently severely impoverished, not only in terms of the decline of species, but also in terms of loss of different types of habitat, in particular hard substrate. This particularly concerns the loss of extensive beds of flat oysters, which in the nineteenth century covered a substantial surface area the North Sea, including the Dutch Continental Shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm Appendix 10.1
    East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm Appendix 10.1 Fish and Shellfish Ecology Technical Appendix Preliminary Environmental Information Volume 3 Document Reference: EA1N-DEVWF-ENV-REP-IBR- 00279_001 www.scottishpowerrenewables.com East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm Preliminary Environmental Information Report Revision Summary Rev Date Document Status Prepared by Checked by Approved by 01a 01/11/2019 For issue Paolo Pizzolla Ian Mackay Helen Walker Description of Revisions Rev Page Section Description 01 n/a n/a Final draft EA1N-DEVWF-ENV-REP-IBR-000279_001 Appendix 10.1 East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm Preliminary Environmental Information Report Glossary of Acronyms Cefas Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science CUPE Catch per unit effort EIA Environmental Impact Assessment HAWG Herring Assessment Working Group IBTS International Beam Trawl Survey ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Sea IFCA Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities IHLS International Herring Larvae Survey IUCN The International Union for Conservation of Nature MMO Marine Management Organisation OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic PSA Particle Size Analysis TAC Total Allowable Catch EA1N-DEVWF-ENV-REP-IBR-000279_001 Appendix 10.1 East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm Preliminary Environmental Information Report Glossary of Terminology East Anglia ONE North The proposed project consisting of up to 67 wind turbines, up to four offshore project electrical platforms, up to one construction operation and maintenance platform, inter-array cables, platform link cables, up to one operational meteorological mast, up to two offshore export cables, fibre optic cables, landfall infrastructure, onshore cables and ducts, onshore substation, and National Grid infrastructure.
    [Show full text]