DOCSLIB.ORG

Norway Pout, Sandeel and North Sea Sprat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norway Pout, Sandeel and North Sea Sprat FINAL REPORT Initial assessment of the Norway sandeel, pout and North Sea sprat fishery Norges Fiskarlag Report No.: 2017-008, Rev 3 Date: January 2nd 2018 Certificate code: 251453-2017-AQ-NOR-ASI Report type: Final Report DNV GL – Business Assurance Report title: Initial assessment of the Norway sandeel, pout and North Sea sprat fishery DNV GL Business Assurance Customer: Norges Fiskarlag, Pirsenteret, Norway AS 7462 TRONDHEIM Veritasveien 1 Contact person: Tor Bjørklund Larsen 1322 HØVIK, Norway Date of issue: January 2nd 2018 Tel: +47 67 57 99 00 Project No.: PRJC -557210 -2016 -MSC -NOR http://www.dnvgl.com Organisation unit: ZNONO418 Report No.: 2017-008, Rev 3 Certificate No.: 251453-2017-AQ-NOR-ASI Objective: Assessment of the Norway sandeel, pout and North Sea sprat fishery against MSC Fisheries Standards v2.0. Prepared by: Verified by: Lucia Revenga Sigrun Bekkevold Team Leader and P2 Expert Principle Consultant Hans Lassen P1 Expert Geir Hønneland P3 Expert Stefan Midteide Project Manager Copyright © DNV GL 2014. All rights reserved. This publication or parts thereof may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, whether digitally or otherwise without the prior written consent of DNV GL. DNV GL and the Horizon Graphic are trademarks of DNV GL AS. The content of this publication shall be kept confidential by the customer, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Reference to part of this publication which may lead to misinterpretation is prohibited. DNV GL Distribution: ☒ Unrestricted distribution (internal and external) ☐ Unrestricted distribution within DNV GL ☐ Limited distribution within DNV GL after 3 years ☐ No distribution (confidential) ☐ Secret Rev. No. Date Reason for Issue Prepared by Verified by 0 2017-04-21 Preliminary Draft Report for Client review 1 2017-06-08 Peer Review Draft Report 2 2017-09-15 Public Comment Draft Report 3 2018-01-02 Final Report [yyyy-mm-dd] Public Certification Report DNV GL – Report No. 2017-008, Rev. Rev 3 – www.dnvgl.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 – issued 8 April 2015 Template approval date: Page i Table of contents ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 1 STOCK ASSESSMENT ACRONYMS AND REFERENCE POINTS .............................................................. 2 MSC ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS........................................................................................... 2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Main strengths and weaknesses of the client’s operation 3 1.2 Determination 4 2 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS ................................................................................ 5 2.1 Peer reviewers 6 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY ........................................................................................ 7 3.1 Units of Assessment (UoA) and scope of certification sought 7 3.2 Overview of the fishery 12 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background 17 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background 36 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background 14 4 EVALUATION PROCEDURE.............................................................................................. 18 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment 18 4.2 Previous assessments 19 4.3 Assessment Methodologies 19 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques 21 5 TRACEABILITY .............................................................................................................. 26 5.1 Eligibility Date 26 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery 26 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody 29 5.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody 30 6 EVALUATION RESULTS .................................................................................................. 30 6.1 Principle Level Scores 30 6.2 Summary of PI Level Scores 31 6.3 Summary of Conditions 34 6.4 Recommendations 34 6.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement 35 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 35 APPENDIX 1 SCORING AND RATIONALES ...................................................................................... 41 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale 41 Principle 1 – Evaluation tables 41 Principle 2 UoC 1-3 - – Evaluation tables 63 Principle 2 UoC 4, 5 - – Evaluation tables 103 Principle 2 UoC 6-8 144 Principle 3 – Evaluation tables 187 DNV GL – Report No. 2017-008, Rev. Rev 3 – www.dnvgl.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 – issued 8 April 2015 Template approval date: Page ii APPENDIX 2 RISK BASED FRAMEWORK (RBF) ............................................................................. 209 APPENDIX 3 CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 214 APPENDIX 4 PEER REVIEW REPORTS .......................................................................................... 221 APPENDIX 5 STAKEHOLDER SUBMISSIONS ................................................................................. 222 APPENDIX 6 SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY .................................................................................... 223 APPENDIX 7 OBJECTIONS PROCESS ........................................................................................... 224 APPENDIX 8 VESSEL LIST ......................................................................................................... 225 APPENDIX 9 CLIENT AGREEMENT ............................................................................................... 226 Figure 1 Distribution of Norwegian fishery for sandeel .................................................................... 13 Figure 2 Distribution of Norwegian fishery for Norway pout ............................................................. 14 Figure 3 Distribution of Norwegian fishery for sprat ........................................................................ 14 Figure 4: Assessment areas for North Sea sand eel ........................................................................ 15 Figure 5 Drawings of fishing gears ............................................................................................... 16 Figure 6 Overview of the ICES advisory process for recurrent advice ................................................ 18 Figure 7: Species compositions of sandeels in commercial landings by sampling areas. ...................... 20 Figure 8 Assessment areas for North Sea sand eel (A. marinus). ..................................................... 22 Figure 9 Stock indicators for Sandeel stocks in the North Sea. ......................................................... 24 Figure 10 Norway pout in Subarea IV and Division IIIa. .................................................................. 28 Figure 11 Norway pout in Subarea IV and Division IIIa. .................................................................. 29 Figure 12 Sprat in Subarea 4. State of the stock and fishery relative to reference points. ................... 32 Figure 13 Sprat in Subarea 4. Estimated landings, recruitment, fishing mortality, and spawning-stock biomass from the stock assessment ............................................................................................. 33 Figure 14: Spawning stock biomass for blue whiting ....................................................................... 40 Figure 15: Fishing pressure for blue whiting .................................................................................. 40 Figure 16: Status of the blue whiting stock against its reference points. ........................................... 40 Figure 17: Sandeel fishing grounds for the Norwegian fleet in 2016. .................................................. 1 Figure 18: Norway pout fishing grounds for the Norwegian fleet in 2016. ............................................ 1 Figure 19: Sprat fishing grounds for the Norwegian fleet in 2016. ...................................................... 1 Figure 20: Major substrates on the shelf in the Greater North Sea. .................................................... 1 Figure 21: EU Natura 2000 Marine Protected Habitats (in blue) in EU jurisdiction. ................................ 3 Figure 22: OSPAR map for threatened or declining habitats. Source: OSPAR Commission. .................... 4 Figure 23: Vulnerable habitats and protected areas as identified in the MAREANO Program maps. ......... 4 Figure 24: a. Bathymetry of the North Sea. ..................................................................................... 5 Figure 25: Significant interactions in the North Sea ecosystem, modelled using statistical tGAMs. .......... 7 Figure 26: Species present in the North Sea and trophic level of each species in the North Sea trophic chain. ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 27: Selectivity index for the targeted species......................................................................... 9 Figure 28: Quantity of fish (in tonnes) consumed by predators and fished. ....................................... 10 Figure 29: Mortality caused on fish groups by the main predator and the fisheries (shown in the x-axis). ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Severn Estuary
    Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. (1984), 64, 771-790 771 Printed in Great Britain ABUNDANCE, MOVEMENTS AND SIZE OF GADOIDS (TELEOSTEI) IN THE SEVERN ESTUARY P. N. CLARIDGE* AND I. C. POTTERf School of Biological Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY Provided by Research Repository (Figs. 1-7) Samples collected regularly from the intake screens of power stations between July 1972 and June 1977 demonstrate that the Gadidae is the most abundant and diverse teleost family in the inner Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. The first records for the Severn Estuary of two cold water species, northern rockling and Norway pout, which were present in appreciable numbers, may be related to the effects of the changes that commenced in south-western English waters during the 1960s. Maximum numbers of the five most abundant gadoids were attained in different years, with the greatest catches being recorded for whiting and poor cod in 1975/6, bib and pollack in 1974/5 and northern rockling in 1976/7. Peak abundance in the middle estuary was reached by whiting, bib, poor cod and pollack in the autumn and by northern rockling in the winter or early spring. The 0 + age class of these species, which was always by far the most predominant category, showed increases in mean length during their relatively short stay in the estuary. Movement out of the shallows of the inner Severn Estuary by whiting and also apparently by some other gadoids occurred when salinities fell below 10%,,.
    [Show full text]
  • Razorbill: Species Information for Marine Special Protection Area Consultations
    Natural England Technical Information Note TIN124 Razorbill: species information for marine Special Protection Area consultations The UK government has committed to identifying a network of Special Protection Areas (SPAs) in the marine environment by 2015. Natural England is responsible for recommending potential SPAs in English waters to Defra for classification. This and other related information notes have been written to provide further information to coastal and marine stakeholders about the bird species we are seeking to protect through Marine SPAs. For more information about the process for establishing marine SPAs see TIN120 Establishing Marine Special Protection Areas. Background The Birds Directive (EC Directive on the conservation of wild birds (79/409/EEC)) requires member states to identify SPAs for: rare or vulnerable bird species (as listed in Annex I of the Directive); and regularly occurring migratory bird species. Razorbills Alca torda are a regularly occurring migratory bird species in Europe. They are 37– 39 cm long with a wingspan of 63-68 cm1. Their typical lifespan is 13 years and the oldest Razorbill by Andy Brown reported individual was over 41 years old2. The majority of UK birds nest in the north and west of Scotland. In England, razorbills breed on Conservation Status coasts and islands in the north and south-west. UK amber-listed bird of conservation concern3. The largest English colony is at Flamborough Distribution and population Head and Bempton Cliffs in Yorkshire. Razorbills only breed along North Atlantic coasts, including the UK. Migration/movements Adults and dependent young disperse offshore The Seabird 2000 census lists the UK breeding from colonies in July – August, with adults population at 187,100 individuals, 20% of global becoming flightless during this period due to 4 population with 11,144 individuals breeding in moult.
    [Show full text]
  • Skates and Rays Diversity, Exploration and Conservation – Case-Study of the Thornback Ray, Raja Clavata
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Tese orientada por Professor Auxiliar com Agregação Leonel Serrano Gordo e Investigadora Auxiliar Ivone Figueiredo Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 The research reported in this thesis was carried out at the Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR - INRB), Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade. This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through a PhD grant (SFRH/BD/23777/2005) and the research project EU Data Collection/DCR (PNAB). Skates and rays diversity, exploration and conservation | Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. viii Agradecimentos ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of Gadid Fishes: Implications for the Biogeographic Origins of Pacific Species
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 19 Molecular systematics of gadid fishes: implications for the biogeographic origins of Pacific species Steven M. Carr, David S. Kivlichan, Pierre Pepin, and Dorothy C. Crutcher Abstract: Phylogenetic relationships among 14 species of gadid fishes were investigated with portions of two mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genes, a 401 base pair (bp) segment of the cytochrome b gene, and a 495 bp segment of the cytochrome oxidase I gene. The molecular data indicate that the three species of gadids endemic to the Pacific Basin represent simultaneous invasions by separate phylogenetic lineages. The Alaskan or walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) is about as closely related to the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) as is the Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), which suggests that T. chalcogramma and G. macrocephalus represent separate invasions of the Pacific Basin. The Pacific tomcod (Microgadus proximus) is more closely related to the Barents Sea navaga (Eleginus navaga) than to the congeneric Atlantic tomcod (Microgadus tomcod), which suggests that the Pacific species is derived from the Eleginus lineage and that Eleginus should be synonymized with Microgadus. Molecular divergences between each of the three endemic Pacific species and their respective closest relatives are similar and consistent with contemporaneous speciation events following the reopening of the Bering Strait ca. 3.0–3.5 million years BP. In contrast, the Greenland cod (Gadus ogac) and the Pacific cod have essentially identical mtDNA sequences; differences between them are less than those found within G. morhua. The Greenland cod appears to represent a contemporary northward and eastward range extension of the Pacific cod, and should be synonymized with it as G.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions
    THE LONDON RESORT PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions WATER QUALITY 13.2.1. The principal water quality data sources that have been used to inform this study are: • Environment Agency (EA) WFD classification status and reporting (e.g. EA 2015); and • EA long-term water quality monitoring data for the tidal Thames. Environment Agency WFD Classification Status 13.2.2. The tidal River Thames is divided into three transitional water bodies as part of the Thames River Basin Management Plan (EA 2015) (Thames Upper [ID GB530603911403], Thames Middle [ID GB53060391140] and Thames Lower [ID GB530603911401]. Each of these waterbodies are classified as heavily modified waterbodies (HMWBs). The most recent EA assessment carried out in 2016, confirms that all three of these water bodies are classified as being at Moderate ecological potential (EA 2018). 13.2.3. The Thames Estuary at the London Resort Project Site is located within the Thames Middle Transitional water body, which is a heavily modified water body on account of the following designated uses (Cycle 2 2015-2021): • Coastal protection; • Flood protection; and • Navigation. 13.2.4. The downstream extent of the Thames Middle transitional water body is located approximately 12 km downstream of the Kent Project Site and 8 km downstream of the Essex Project Site near Lower Hope Point. Downstream of this location is the Thames Lower water body which extends to the outer Thames Estuary. 13.2.5. A summary of the current Thames Middle water body WFD status is presented in Table A13.2.1, together with those supporting elements that do not currently meet at least Good status and their associated objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Razorbill Alca Torda in North Norway
    THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ON THE BREEDING SUCCESS OF RAZORBILLS (ALCA TORDA L. 1758) ON MACHIAS SEAL ISLAND, NB IN 2000 AND 2001 by Virgil D. Grecian Bachelor of Science (Hon), Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1996 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Graduate Academic Unit of Biology Supervisors: A.W. Diamond, Ph.D., Biology and Forestry & Environmental Management, J.W. Chardine, Ph.D., Canadian Wildlife Service Supervisory Committee: D.J. Hamilton, Ph.D., Mt Allison University Examining Board: This thesis is accepted. ………………………………………… Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada December, 2004 ABSTRACT The influence of various physical and biological parameters on the breeding biology of Razorbills (Alca torda) on Machias Seal Island (MSI) was studied in 2000 and 2001. The major predators (gulls) on seabird eggs and chicks on MSI are controlled, providing an unusual opportunity to study breeding biology in the virtual absence of predation. The timing of egg-laying was right skewed in both years. A complete survey 10-14 June 2000 of all Razorbill breeding habitat on MSI was combined with radio telemetry to estimate the total number of inaccessible breeding sites that may not have been counted. A corrected breeding pair estimate for MSI is 592 ± 17 pairs. Overall breeding success was 55% in 2000 and 59% in 2001. Most chicks that hatched also departed the island, so differences in breeding success were due chiefly to differences in hatching success. Adults breeding in burrows were more successful than adults in crevice and open nest sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Breeding Biology of Guillemots Uria Spp. and Razorbills Alca Torda at a Colony in the Northwest Atlantic
    Breeding biology ofGuillemots and Razorbills 121 121 Comparative breeding biology of Guillemots Uria spp. and Razorbills Alca torda at a colony in the Northwest Atlantic Vergelijkende broedbiologie van Zeekoeten en Alken op een kolonie in het Noorwestelijke Atlantische gebied J. Mark+Hipfner&Rachel Bryant Biopsychology Programme. Memorial University ofNewfoundland St. John's. NF. Canada AIB 3X9e-mail:[email protected] the Common Guillemots, We compared various aspectsof breedingbiology ofRazorbills, ” and Brünnich’s Guillemots (the “intermediate auks) at the Gannet Islands, Labrador. Canada, in 1997. In all three species, layingfollowed a strongly right-skewedpattern, In with median laying dates falling within a narrow window between 27-29 June. and comparison topreviousyears, laying was late, relatively synchronous among species. 2 in Razorbills 35 than in either Incubation periods were days longer (median days) guillemot species (33 days), whereas Common Guillemots had longer nestling periods (mean 24 days) than Razorbills (19 days) or Brünnich’s Guillemots (20 days). In all species, there was a tendency for late-laying pairs to contract their breeding periods, in mainly by reducing the duration of the nestling period. Breeding success was high Razorbills (73%) and Common Guillemots (85%), but low in Brünnich’s Guillemots Brünnich Guillemots (51%), largely due to low hatching success. Late-breeding ’s were little this in the other more likely tofail than were earlypairs, but there was indication of two species. Seasonal patterns of colony attendance suggested that there were many young, pre-breeding Brünnich’s Guillemots and Razorbills present; populations of these in since species appear to be faring well at this colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Runde Miljøsenter: North Atlantic Seabird Seminar
    North Atlantic Seabird Seminar – Fosnavåg, Norway 20-21 April 2015 Michael Hundeide (ed.) Runde Environmental Centre In cooperation with: Birdlife Norway (NOF) and Norwegian Biologist Association (BiO). Distribution: Open/Closed Runde Miljøsenter AS Client(s) 6096 Runde Org. Nr. 987 410 752 MVA Telephone: +47 70 08 08 00 E-mail: [email protected] Date: Web: www.rundesenteret.no 18.09.2015 Report Runde Miljøsenter Norsk: Nordatlantisk sjøfuglseminar 2015. Fosnavåg 20. og 21. April Rapportnummer: English: North Atlantic Seabird Seminar – Fosnavåg, Norway 20-21 April 2015 Author(s): Number of pages: Michael Hundeide (ed.) 52 Key words: Seabird ecology, Runde, North Atlantic, sand eel Sammendrag (Norsk):Rapporten er en gjengivelse av de temaer som ble presentert og diskutert på det internasjonale sjøfuglseminaret i Fosnavåg 20. og 21. april 2015: En rekke sjøfuglbestander har hatt en drastisk tilbakegang på Runde i senere år. Særlig gjelder dette artene: Krykkje, havhest, toppskarv, lomvi, alke, lunde m.fl. Med unntak av havsule, storjo og havørn som har hatt en økende tendens, har så å si samtlige av de andre sjøfuglartene gått ned. Denne situasjonen er ikke enestående for Runde og Norge, samme tendens gjør seg også gjeldende i Storbritannia, på Island og i hele Nordøst -Atlanteren. Selv om årsakene til krisen hos sjøfuglene er sammensatte og komplekse, var de fleste innleggsholderne enige om følgende punkter: 1) En vesentlig del av årsaken til krisen for sjøfuglbestandene på Runde og i Nordøst-Atlanteren skyldes mangel på egnet energirik mat (fettrik fisk av rett størrelse særlig tobis i Skottland, Færøyene og Sør-Vestlige Island) i hekkesesongen. Dette kan i sin tur forklares som en indirekte effekt av en liten økning i gjennomsnittstemperatur i havet.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 References
    990 ICES WGNSSK Report 2006 17 References Note: several references to ICES documents are incomplete. These are marked with XXXX. Arnott, S. A. and Ruxton, G. D. (2002) Sandeel recruitment in the North Sea: demographic, climatic and trophic effects. Marine Ecology Progress series, 238, 199-210. Bagge, O. and Munch-Petersen, S. (1979). Some possible factors governing the catchability of Norway lobster in the Kattegat. Rapports et proces-verbaux des reunions. Conseil international pour l exploration de la mer 175:143-146. Bagge, O., Nielsen, E., Mellergaard, S. and Dalsgaard, I. (1990). Hypoxia and the demersal fish stock in Kattegat (IIIa) and Subdivision 22. ICES C.M. 1990/E:4. Bailey N., Chapman C.J., Kinnear J., Bova D. and Weetman A. (1993) Estimation of Nephrops stock biomass on the Fladen Ground by TV survey. ICES CM 1993/K:34. Bell, M., Dann, J., Lawler, A., Lovewell, S., Cutchey, S., Palmer, D., Smith, M., McCubbin, D. and Armstrong, M. (2005). Programme 6: NE Nephrops; 6a: Nephrops survey. CEFAS/NFFO Fisheries Science Partnership 2004/05 Final Report. Blegvad, H. (1934). Omplantering af rødspætter fra Nordsøen til Bæltfarvanene 1928-1933. Beretning fra den Danske Biologiske Station XXXIX:9-83 Boje, J and Nielsen, E. (2006). 0-group survey for plaice in Kattegat (IIIaS) 1985-2005. Working paper #12 for WGNSSK 2006. [WD12] Boje, J. and Nielsen, E. (2006). 0-group survey for plaice in Kattegat (IIIaS) 1985-2005. [WD12] Borges, L., Kraak, S. B. M. and Machiels, M. A. M. (2006). Stock assessment of North Sea plaice using a Bayesian catch-at-age model.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
    little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries in Denmark
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES FISHERIES IN DENMARK NOTE This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries. AUTHORS Jakub SEMRAU, Juan José ORTEGA GRAS Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Virginija KELMELYTE LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translations: DA, ES ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in September 2013. © European Parliament, 2013. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES FISHERIES IN DENMARK NOTE Abstract The present note was requested by the Committee on Fisheries of the European Parliament for its Delegation to the northern part of Jutland, Denmark (28-30 October 2013). The note provides a review of the main characteristics of the Danish fisheries sector, covering both the North and Baltic seas, and the waters of Skagerrak and Kattegat. It provides an overview of issues such as the legal and institutional framework, fisheries management, catches, the fishing fleet, fishing industry, trade, employment, the fish market and marine research.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an Updated Checklist
    1 2 Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist 3 4 5 RAFAEL BAÑON1, DAVID VILLEGAS-RÍOS2, ALBERTO SERRANO3, 6 GONZALO MUCIENTES2,4 & JUAN CARLOS ARRONTE3 7 8 9 10 1 Servizo de Planificación, Dirección Xeral de Recursos Mariños, Consellería de Pesca 11 e Asuntos Marítimos, Rúa do Valiño 63-65, 15703 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E- 12 mail: [email protected] 13 2 CSIC. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas. Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo 14 (Pontevedra), Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (D. V-R); [email protected] 15 (G.M.). 16 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. de Santander, Santander, Spain. E-mail: 17 [email protected] (A.S); [email protected] (J.-C. A). 18 4Centro Tecnológico del Mar, CETMAR. Eduardo Cabello s.n., 36208. Vigo 19 (Pontevedra), Spain. 20 21 Abstract 22 23 An annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Galician waters is presented. The list 24 is based on historical literature records and new revisions. The ichthyofauna list is 25 composed by 397 species very diversified in 2 superclass, 3 class, 35 orders, 139 1 1 families and 288 genus. The order Perciformes is the most diverse one with 37 families, 2 91 genus and 135 species. Gobiidae (19 species) and Sparidae (19 species) are the 3 richest families. Biogeographically, the Lusitanian group includes 203 species (51.1%), 4 followed by 149 species of the Atlantic (37.5%), then 28 of the Boreal (7.1%), and 17 5 of the African (4.3%) groups. We have recognized 41 new records, and 3 other records 6 have been identified as doubtful.
    [Show full text]