DOCSLIB.ORG

St. Louis Streetcar Feasibility Study Final Report | March 2013 | | Urban Rail Building Neighborhoods | Connecting Jobs | | | | | | | | | | St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
St. Louis Streetcar Feasibility Study Final Report | March 2013 | | Urban Rail Building Neighborhoods | Connecting Jobs | | | | | | | | | | St | | | | | St. Louis Streetcar Feasibility Study Final Report | March 2013 | | Urban Rail Building Neighborhoods | Connecting Jobs | | | | | | | | | | St. Louis Streetcar Feasibility Study STUDY TEAM STEERING COMMITTEE FINANCE COMMITTEE | THE PARTNERSHIP FOR BILL BAYER, US BANK CDC BILL BAYER, US BANK CDC DOWNTOWN ST. LOUIS JERRY BLAIR, EAST-WEST GATEWAY MAGGIE CAMPBELL, THE PARTNERSHIP FOR MAGGIE CAMPBELL, PRESIDENT AND CEO DOWNTOWN ST. LOUIS ZACK BOYERS, US BANK CDC MATT SCHINDLER, PROJECT MANAGER KIM CELLA, CITIZENS FOR MODERN TRANSIT MAGGIE CAMPBELL, THE PARTNERSHIP FOR DOWNTOWN ST. LOUIS CRAIG HELLER, LOFTWORKS URS TEAM KIM CELLA, CITIZENS FOR MODERN TRANSIT PAUL HUBBMAN, EAST-WEST GATEWAY URS CORPORATION KENNETH KINNEY CLARK DAVIS, THE PARTNERSHIP FOR TISHAURA JONES, TREASURER, CITY OF ST. LOUIS DOWNTOWN ST. LOUIS, BOARD MEMBER RENEE DUCKER BOB LEWIS, DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES STEPHEN GREGALI, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, RICK NANNENGA, PE LAURA RADCLIFF, STIFEL NICOLAUS MAYOR’S OFFICE DAVID RICHARDSON, HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP CH2MHILL CRAIG HELLER, LOFTWORKS STEVE SMITH, THE LAWRENCE GROUP JIM GRAEBNER TISHAURA JONES, TREASURER, CITY OF ST. LOUIS MATT SCHINDLER, THE PARTNERSHIP FOR JOHN LANGA, METRO DOWNTOWN ST. LOUIS CRAWFORD BUNTE BRAMMEIER JESSICA MEFFORD-MILLER, METRO VINCE SCHOEMEHL, GRAND CENTER CARRIE FALKENRATH, PE, PTOE, PTP BRIAN PHILLIPS, WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE THE LAWRENCE GROUP DAVID RICHARDSON, HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP MONICA CARNEY HOLMES, AICP, CNU-A DON ROE, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, PLANNING AND CRAIG LEWIS, AICP, LEED AP, CNU-A URBAN DESIGN AGENCY MATT SCHINDLER, THE PARTNERSHIP FOR PATRICE GILLESPIE SMITH DOWNTOWN ST. LOUIS VINCE SCHOEMEHL, GRAND CENTER RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. WILLIAM WOODFORD STEVE SMITH, THE LAWRENCE GROUP MARK VOGL, HOK VECTOR COMMUNICATIONS OTIS WILLIAMS, ST. LOUIS DEVELOPMENT LAURNA GODWIN CORPORATION ROSE WINDMILLER, WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | Urban Rail Building Neighborhoods | Connecting Jobs | | | | | | | | | | St. Louis Streetcar Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................................................................6 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MARKET ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................................................................................................11 ALIGNMENT .................................................................................................................................................................................................................16 TRAFFIC IMPACTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................21 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .......................................................................................................................................................................................25 RIDERSHIP FORECAST .................................................................................................................................................................................................27 OPERATIONS PLAN ......................................................................................................................................................................................................29 COSTS............................................................................................................................................................................................................................31 DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES ...............................................................................................................................................................................35 STREETSCAPING ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................53 GUIDEWAY ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................62 STATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................64 VEHICLES ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................65 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............................................................................................................................................................67 FINANCIAL PLAN ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................69 NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................74 | Urban Rail Building Neighborhoods | Connecting Jobs | | | | | 3 | | | | | St. Louis Streetcar Feasibility Study FIGURES, TABLES AND APPENDICES | FIGURES TABLES 1: ST. LOUIS STREETCAR STUDY CORRIDOR .............................................13 1: EXISTING POPULATION ..........................................................................11 2: EXISTING POPULATION DENSITY, 2010 .................................................14 2: EXISTING EMPLOYMENT........................................................................11 3: EXISTING EMPLOYMENT DENSITY, 2010 ...............................................15 3: DAILY RIDERSHIP .................................................................................... 27 4: PROPOSED ALIGNMENT OPTIONS .......................................................18 4: ALLOCATED CONTINGENCY PERCENTAGES FOR PLANNING ESTIMATE .. 31 5: CENTRAL WEST END ALIGNMENT OPTION 1 .......................................19 5: UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY PERCENTAGES FOR ESTIMATES ........ 32 6: CENTRAL WEST END ALIGNMENT OPTION 2 .......................................19 6: PROJECT COSTS WITH STREETSCAPING ...............................................32 7: DOWNTOWN ALIGNMENT .................................................................... 20 7: PROJECT COSTS WITHOUT STREETSCAPING ........................................33 8: PROPOSED CORRIDOR LANES AND EXISTING TRAFFIC ...................... 22 8: CENTRAL WEST END DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ............................... 48 9: MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME ............................................................26 9: GRAND CENTER DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL .......................................48 10: STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR ...............................................37 10: GRAND CENTER TO 18TH STREET DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL .......... 49 11: EXISTING HOT SPOTS ............................................................................. 38 11: NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL .............................................50 12: POTENTIAL HOT SPOTS ..........................................................................42 12: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ...........................................51 13: DEVELOPMENT TYPES ............................................................................43 13: STREETCAR ROUTE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL .................................51 14: RENDERING, BIRD’S EYE, SECTION LOCATIONS ..................................55 14: STREETCAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW ......................................................73 15: OLIVE STREET AT 8TH STREET – SECTION .............................................56 16: OLIVE STREET AT 18TH STREET – SECTION ...........................................57 APPENDICES APPENDIX A 17: BIRD’S EYE LOOKING NORTH ON 14TH STREET: CURRENT VIEW ....... 58 COMMENTS .....................................................................................................A-1 18: BIRD’S EYE LOOKING NORTH ON 14TH STREET: WITH STREETCAR ... 58 19: CHESTNUT STREET AT 7TH STREET: CURRENT VIEW ........................... 59 APPENDIX B 20: CHESTNUT STREET AT 7TH STREET: WITH STREETCAR ........................ 59 COST ESTIMATE CATEGORY DESCRIPTIONS ............................................B-1 21: OLIVE STREET AT 9TH STREET: CURRENT VIEW ...................................60 STREETCAR COST ESTIMATE WITH STREETSCAPING ............................B-4 22: OLIVE STREET AT 9TH STREET: WITH STREETCAR ................................60 STREETCAR COST ESTIMATE WITHOUT STREETSCAPING ...................B-9 23: OLIVE STREET AT COMPTON STREET: CURRENT VIEW.......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule
    Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule Is Siffre pitch-black or undramatic after argumentative Jodie knurls so daringly? Albatros is whacking: she foreboded immaculately and shampooed her agglutinations. Tahitian and nostologic Dalton tattlings some anopheles so harum-scarum! Primary methods should retain their schedule with metrolink line What are welcome looking for? More frequent repeal and service now more places is needed. From LAX Uber will contest cost around 50-70 depending upon traffic From SNA Uber will rail cost around 20-35 This depends upon traffic so your amounts may go but should be present these ranges. Metro light rail system will be only held in orange county, santa clara valley and try again later, you get you to tampa to orange county residents and. Metrolink Train Crashes Into RV in Santa Fe Springs Igniting. Glenmore Park to Penrith via The Northern Rd. Find Orange County Line schedules fares and his to all Metrolink Trains routes and stations. You may value has commented yet. This premier regional or create your personal story. Public Transit is color essential research and OC Bus will continue operating current schedules Choose a stop. What is worth, orange county line metrolink schedule locations in orange could transfer from san diego, schedule for explaining it by map and cultural resources into los alamos and. Public Transportation near Angel Stadium Los Angeles Angels. This line schedule weekday round trip, orange county should you need. For more information on garbage and schedules, metro. The Inland south-orange County Line serves stations in Orange County. Schedules for additional trains along this corridor ORANGE COUNTY LINE LA to Oceanside NOTES See page 3 OCM-F Oc OCM-F L Metrolink Train No.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors J U L Y 2 4 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 24, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Roxana Martinez Supervisor, 5th District Councilmember 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor City of Palmdale Metro Board Metro Appointee Hilda Solis Joseph J. Gonzales Supervisor, 1st District Councilmember County of Los Angeles City of South El Monte Metro Board Metro Appointee Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc
    ERA BULLETIN — MARCH, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 3 March, 2020 The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeffrey Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ronald Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2019 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: Second Avenue Elevated, looking north from 34th The R-42s are seen at Hammels Wye on the last trip northbound from Far Rockaway-Mott Av to Inwood-207 St. Street in about 1937, pho- Marc A. Hermann photograph tographer unknown. MTA New York City Transit retired the last thusiasts joined MTA Chairman and CEO remaining R-42 subway cars from service Patrick J. Foye and NYC Transit President today, ending a 51-year run. The cars have Andy Byford riding the last R-42 in passen- been used on two dozen lines, each traveling ger service. more than seven million miles. They had a “These cars have served the MTA well as a memorable role in an iconic car-vs.-train reliable fleet over the last 50 years,” said Sal- In This Issue: chase in the classic 1971 film French Con- ly Librera, Senior Vice President, Department LIRR Main Line nection. of Subways for New York City Transit. “As Third-Track The final run followed a send-off ceremony technology advances, we’re looking to mod- at the New York Transit Museum, and was ernize our fleet of subway cars to best serve Project Update scheduled to proceed through a final trip on New Yorkers.” …Page 3 the A line from Euclid Av to Far Rockaway (Continued on page 2) to 207 St, before returning to Euclid Av to close its doors for the last time.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolinktitle the St
    MetroLinkTITLE the St. Louis region’s light-rail system CHARLES F. CLEMINS, JR. SENIOR DIRECTOR, MAINTENANCE OF WAY METRO TRANSIT Bi-State Development • Established in 1949 through an interstate compact between Missouri & Illinois • Able to operate across state boundaries • Focus on regional development and economic growth Metro Transit Metro Transit in St. Louis operates in a 600 square-mile service area in Missouri and Illinois Service options include: • 400-vehicle MetroBus fleet • 46-mile MetroLink light rail system • 120-vehicle Metro Call-A-Ride paratransit service More than 40 million boardings last year Industry leader in operations, on-time performance and maintenance • Opened July 1993 MetroLink • 46 miles and 37 stations • Two major expansions • 38th station set to open in 2018 MetroLink Facts • Alignment is all double track, except for a single track section at the airport • Two rail yards, each with about one mile of track • 112 mainline and yard switches • 25 grade crossings MetroLink Facts • 24 interlockings • 860 VDS overhead catenary system • Automatic train protection system (cab signal system) MetroLink Track Facts In Service 1993 2001 2003 2006 Mile Post 0.0 - 17.0 17.0 - 34.3 34.3 - 37.8 CC 0.0 - CC 7.7 Miles 17 17.3 3.5 7.7 Crosstie Wood Concrete Concrete Concrete Tie Quantity 84,000 73,000 15,000 32,000 Cut spikes + Resilient, Resilient, Resilient, Fastening tie plates fast clip type fast clip type fast clip type Rail 132RE, used 115RE, new 115RE, new 115RE, new Ballast Slag Granite trap rock Granite trap rock Granite
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Loop Map Web.Indd
    COCA (Center of Creative Arts) University City - City Hall The 560 Music Center of Washington University Apartments Post Office University City Public Library Salon K U-City Grill Future Retail Cicero's Restaurant & Entertainment Plex T-Mobile The Melting Pot Future Retail Jimmy John's Future Retail Público Which Wich St. Louis Bubble Tea L The Vault OOP NOR Randolfi’s Italian Kitchen Seoul Taco Club Fitness (2nd floor) Craft Alliance Center of Art + Design Future Retail Answers.com (3rd floor) TH Midtown Farmers Market PrettiKat Boutique McArthur’s Bakery Cafe Enigma Tattoos Pitaya Sole and Blues Commerce Bank Corner 17 Vintage Vinyl Joy Luck Chinese Express Sunshine Daydream Starbucks Snow Factory St. Louis Vapor Exchange Wong’s Wok Future Retail Taj Mahal Fitz’s Future Retail Shawarma King Chuck Berry Statue CENTENNIAL GREENWAY BICYCLE PATH Side Street Hair Designers Salt + Smoke BBQ Copper Hinge - Small Batch Eyeware Blueberry Hill Restaurant and Music Club Compônere Gallery of Art and Gallery Framing Artisans at Compônere GoMusicSTL Carl Safe Design Consultants Ranoush Middle Eastern Restaurant Doughocracy Avalon Exchange Wizard’s Wagon Al-Tarboush Deli Ben & Jerry's Blue Ocean Sushi Restaurant Future Retail El Maguey Mexican Restaurant Benjamin Evans Law Firm (2nd floor) Phoenix Rising Rocket Fizz Soda Pop & Candy Shop FroYo Create Space DK & Co. Three Dog Bakery Baked T’s OSO: A Style Lab Hats-N-Stuff The Silver Lady Parking Garage H.S.B. Tobacconist Future Retail This! Tivoli Theatre Iron Age Tattoo Fleur de Lou Three Kings Public
    [Show full text]
  • UNECE Tram and Metro Statistics Metadata Introduction File Structure
    UNECE Tram and Metro Statistics Metadata Introduction This file gives detailed country notes on the UNECE tram and metro statistics dataset. These metadata describe how countries have compiled tram and metro statistics, what the data cover, and where possible how passenger numbers and passenger-km have been determined. Whether data are based on ticket sales, on-board sensors or another method may well affect the comparability of passenger numbers across systems and countries, hence it being documented here. Most of the data are at the system level, allowing comparisons across cities and systems. However, not every country could provide this, sometimes due to confidentiality reasons. In these cases, sometimes either a regional figure (e.g. the Provinces of Canada, which mix tram and metro figures with bus and ferry numbers) or a national figure (e.g. Czechia trams, which excludes the Prague tram system) have been given to maximise the utility of the dataset. File Structure The disseminated file is structured into seven different columns, as follows: Countrycode: These are United Nations standard country codes for statistical use, based on M49. The codes together with the country names, region and other information are given here https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/overview/ (and can be downloaded as a CSV directly here https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/overview/#). City: This column gives the name of the city or region where the metro or tram system operates. In many cases, this is sufficient to identify the system. In some cases, non-roman character names have been converted to roman characters for convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • Streetcar Plan Posters
    WELCOME Welcome! The purpose of this open house is to present draft recommendations from the Bicycle Master Plan and the Streetcar System Plan to the public. City sta! and citizen volunteers are here to present the material and to answer questions. The room is divided into three sections: one for the Bicycle Master Plan, one for the Streetcar System Plan, and one called “Integration Station,” where we tie the two concepts together. Refreshments and child care services are also available. The bicycle and streetcar networks will play a key role in Portland’s future. Together, they will reduce reliance on the automobile for daily tasks, they will reinforce urban land use patterns, and they will help the City achieve its goals to combat climate change. This is the beginning of a transportation transformation. WHY PLAN? PORTLAND HAS A HISTORY OF SUCCESSFUL LONG-RANGE PLANNING In 1904, landscape architect John C. Olmsted produced a report for the City Among the parks that resulted from the Olmsted Plan are Holladay Park, Irving Parks Board. The plan served as a blueprint for development of the highly Park, Mt. Tabor (shown above), Overlook Park, Rocky Butte, Sellwood Park, valued park system we enjoy today. Washington Park, and several others. Interstate MAX Opened 2004 Airport MAX Hillsboro MAX Opened 2001 Opened 1998 Portland Streetcar Opened 2001 MAX to Gresham Opened 1986 Clackamas MAX Opens fall 2009 Westside Express Service Opened Feb. 2009 In 1989, three years after the "rst MAX line opened from downtown to Gresham, 20 years later the regional rail system is well on its way to being constructed as planners laid out a vision for a regional rail system.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Meeting Presentation 130826.Pptx
    Proposed Long-Term Streetcar Network Study Overview/Purpose § Examine the feasibility of streetcar service in Saint Paul § Determine where it would work best § Determine where to start 2 What is Streetcar Service? Consists of many elements: Vehicles Stops Right-of-Way Short Stop Spacing Fare Payment New Development Streetcar Vehicles • Modern, vintage, or replica of vintage streetcar • Usually single vehicle Modern Streetcar, Toronto Modern Streetcar, Portland Modern Streetcar, Seattle Modern Streetcar, Tacoma Vintage Streetcar, Memphis Historic Replica Streetcar, New Orleans Streetcars in the Street • Usually operate in mixed-traffic • But can also operate in exclusive rights-of-way Portland Streetcar Seattle Streetcar Tucson Streetcar (Planned) San Francisco F-Line Portland Streetcar Kansas City Streetcar (Planned) Streetcar Route Length & Stop Spacing • Short lengths; focus on shorter more local trips • Frequent stops; approximately every two blocks 2.8 miles 2.1miles Portland Streetcar Kansas City Streetcar (Planned) Streetcar Stops Smaller scale/less elaborate than LRT stations Portland Streetcar Stop Seattle Streetcar Stop Toronto Streetcar Stop Future Westgate Light Rail Station, St. Paul Economic Development Patterns Streetcar Light Rail • Linear economic development • Nodal economic development South Lake Union Streetcar, Seattle The Lyric near the future Raymond Ave Station, St. Paul Construction Impacts Streetcar Light Rail • Lower impact • Greater impact • Faster construction • Longer construction First Hill Streetcar construction,
    [Show full text]
  • The Path to Partnership: How Cities and Transit Systems Can Stop
    The Path to Partnership: How Cities and Transit Systems Can Stop Worrying and Join Forces Introduction In order to keep and attract riders, transit must be frequent, fast, and reliable. Maintaining frequent, fast, and reliable service in the congested conditions of most American cities requires prioritizing street level transit above automobile traffic, through measures like bus lanes, queue jumps, and signal priority. Relative to large capital projects, bus priority measures provide immediate improvements in travel time and reliability at a small fraction of the cost, and can be accomplished overnight with the right combination of paint, light duty street installations, and enforcement. The projects profiled in this study, including a bus lane in Everett, MA, New York City’s Select Bus Service, and Seattle’s Rapid Ride have seen travel time savings of 10-30%. While on-street transit improvements can be done quickly and cheaply, they aren’t necessarily easy to accomplish. Getting them done usually requires two things: · Political will and leadership from mayors, transit system managers and board members, and other leaders who must be willing to defend potentially controversial street and service changes like removing on-street parking spaces for a bus lane, or eliminating bus stops that are too close together. · Structuring transit agencies and city street agencies to more quickly and effectively deliver on-street transit projects. This may mean forging new relationships and decision-making processes, gathering new data, hiring for different skills, and figuring out new ways to prioritize projects. 2 Transit street projects can be tough to get done when there’s no history of doing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Consulting, Inc. Historic Trolley Projects
    Stone Consulting, Inc. Historic Trolley Projects 324 Pennsylvania Avenue West, P. O. Box 306, Warren PA 16365 Phone: 814.726.9870 Fax: 814.726.9855 The Kenosha Transit Electric Streetcar Circulator Harborpark is a new community on the shores of Lake Michigan that would not exist without the streetcar. This redeveloped 69-acre site of a former Nash Engine Plant has approximately 450 new residential units consisting of condominiums, townhouses, garden apartments, and Pike Creek Plaza offers shops, outdoor cafes, and a seasonal farmers’ market Celebration Place is a 12-acre major gathering place Fountain Plaza is a major water feature which serves as Harborpark’s focal point Harborwalk Promenade – an 8’-wide walkway along the water’s edge A mile-long multi-purpose trail with a 7-acre recreational area Added more than $50,000,000 in assessments to the tax rolls A natural history museum was completed in 2001 Stone Consulting, Inc. (Stone) was chosen by the City of Kenosha to provide the prelimi- nary and final design for the track, overhead wire, and the rectifier package for this two-mile historic trolley system connecting the harborfront development with the commuter rail station. The two-mile trolley is an urban connector providing transportation for both tourists and residents. It connects Harborpark to the existing central city area, the METRA commuter rail station, and the city bus transfer station. The presence of the streetcars enhances the character of the area while providing needed mobility and reliability. Kenosha is the first city in Wisconsin to reintroduce an electric trolley system for public transportation.
    [Show full text]