<<

Tumbahangfe,Our SubbaNature│December and Prasad / Our 2018│16 Nature (1): (2018), 74-7 169 (1): 74-79

Branchial muscles of a Hill-stream Cyprinid Neolissochilus hexagonolepis (McClelland,1839)

Jawan Tumbahangfe1*, Bharat Raj Subba2** and Archana Prasad3***

1*Punya Higher Secondary School, Rajarani, Dhankuta, Nepal **2Department of Zoology, Post Graduate Campus, Tribhuvan.University, Biratnagar, Nepal 3Central Department of Zoology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal *E-mail: [email protected] **E-mail: [email protected] ***E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract Different branchial muscles associated with the arches and gill filaments in a hill-stream cyprinid fish Neolissochilus hexagonolepis have been studied. The main branchial muscles observed are the constrictors branchiales, levatores arcuum branchialium epiarcualia obliqui, epiarcualia recti, subarcualia obliqui, subarcualia recti and subarcualia transversi. In the general plan the branchial muscles of N. hexagonolepis show similarity with those of other cyprinid . However, the fish bears three pairs of coracobranchiales, common to cyprinid fishes.

Key words: Coracobranchiales, Branchial movement, , hemibranch

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/on.v16i1.22125 Manuscript details: Received: 19.06.2018 / Accepted: 12.10.2018 Citation: Tumbahangfe, J., B.R. Subba and A. Prasad 2018 Branchial muscles of a Hill-stream Cyprinid fish Neolissochilus hexagonolepis (McClelland,1839), Our Nature 16(1): 74-79. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3126/on.v16i1.22125 Copyright: © Tumbahangfe, Subba and Prasad 2018. Creative Common Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International License.

Introduction Materials and methods In fish, branchial arches and the gill filaments A few adult specimens were collected from are brought in movement by a series of branchial Tamor river at Dumrebesi (N 26056'19.0", E muscles. The respiratory movements in fish are 087022'18.9") Dhankuta, Nepal, with the help of closely associated with the dilation and local fishermen and fixed in ethanol then brought subsequent contraction of the bucco-pharynx. to zoology laboratory of Post Graduate Campus, The branchial muscles in fishes have been Biratnagar. The specimens were dissected studied and described by several workers. carefully to expose the branchial muscles of the Among the earlier workers, special references different gill arches. The branchial muscles may be made of Duvernoy (1839), Reiss (1981), dissected out from fresh specimens were fixed in Rauther (1925), Edgeworth (1935) and Kesteven 70% ethanol for further studies. Small pieces of (1942-43). Bijtel (1947, 1949), Subba and Ghosh of freshly killed fish were fixed in Bouin’s (1999), Shrestha and Subba (2006) worked on a and Zenker’s fixatives for the study of histology number of fishes and concluded that the adductor of the muscles of gill filament. muscles of the gills were responsible for the The large specimens fixed in ethanol were coughing movements in fishes. dissected out without using microscope but the In the present study, the branchial muscles binocular microscope was used to confirm of a hill-steam cyprinid fish, Neolissochilus attachment of some of the branchial muscles. hexagonolepis have been studied in relation to Small pieces of gills were decalcified and branchial movements. paraffin blocks were prepared then 5-6µm thick

74

Tumbahangfe, Subba and Prasad / Our Nature (2018), 16 (1): 74-79 sections were cut and stained with Reiss (1881) and Rauther (1925) have haematoxylin/eosin. A few Alizarin preparations suggested that the abductor muscles perform the were also made. 1g Alizarin was dissolved function of propulsion of blood and renewal of in1lit.of 1% of KOH solution. A suitable sized respiratory water. These functions were fish already fixed in formalin for12hrs was discarded by Bijtel (1949) on the basis of the fact washed in running water for 24-48hrs after that that abductor muscles do not show rhythmic transferred to 1% KOH solution and left for 48 movement. According to Munshi (1961, 1962), hrs. or so till the material became transparent. the abductor muscles held in the movement of The transparent fish was transferred to Alizarin gill filaments while the adductor muscles help in solution and kept till the were stained red bringing the filament tips of a holobranch close then stored in pure glycerin for observation. together during coughing movement (b) The Levatores arcuum branchialium Results and discussion (Levator arcus branchialis): Altogether there are The Alizarine preparations were especially twelve levatores arcuum branchialium attached helpful in understanding the relationship to the branchial basket of N. hexagonolepis. Out between the muscles and skeleton of the of them, six are external while two are internal branchial arches. In Neolissochilus (Fig. 1 a, b, c, d). The external levatores hexagonolepis, the following branchial muscles originate from the sphenotic region of the skull were observed (Fig.1 and Tab.1). (Fig. 1 f) and inserted on the epibranchials of the a) The Constrictores branchiales first second and third arches and the (Constrictor branchialis): In N. pharyngobranchial of the fourth. Two of the hexagonolepis, the constrictor branchiales levatores of the fourth gill arch are attached to consists of two parts (i) Abductor and (ii) the small disc like piece which bears small teeth, adductor muscle units. referred as pharyngeal tooth pad (i) The abductor muscle unit: A sheet of The number of internal and external units of muscle situated on the outer side of the levatores arcuum branchialium shows variation holobranch represents the abductor muscle unit. in different fish species. In C. batrachus and H. This sheet gradually tapers from the epibranchial fossilis the levatores are represented by 2 internal region to ceratobranchial to hypobranchial and 2 external units (Munshi, 1961, 1962). In the region (Fig.1. a, b, c,) of the gill arch. Fibrous hill stream fish Garra mullya, they are connective tissue connects the gill rays’ heads represented by 2 internal and 4 external levatores with the gill arch. in three cyprinid fish viz. Chela bacaila, Labeo (ii) The adductor muscle unit: The adductor rohita and Cirrhinus mrigala. In Nandus nandus muscles lie in the inter branchial septum which and Glossogobius giuris two intetnal and five is reduced and covers only about 22% of the external levatores are represented on each side of total length of the primary filament. The muscle the branchial arches whereas (Singh,1967). fibre take their origin from the opposite gill rays. Levatores arcuum branchialium of Their tendons cross each other and become Perophthalmus vulgaris possesses one extetnal inserted on to the gill rays of the opposite and one internal unit only on the fourth pair of hemibranch. branchial arches. However, in N. hexagonolepis The two muscle components of constrictors there are altogether twelve levatores which branchiales, namely, the abductor and adductor perhaps provide better support to the gill arches. muscles show close conformity in their structure (c) The Epiarcualia oblique (Epiarcualis and disposition with those of other Siluroid obliquus): In N. hexagonolepis, the epiarcualia fishes viz. Clarias batrachus (Munshi, 1961) and oblique muscles originate from the epibranchials Heterpneustes fossilis (Munshi, 1962). In G. and extend on to the pharyngobranchial of the telchitta the abductor muscles are less developed respective gill arches. This muscle is represented as compared to H. fossilis and C. batrachus. The on the second and fourth gill arches only (Fig. 1 abductor muscle is present only on the oral side d). The former is more developed than the latter. of the first three gill arches. The muscle lies in Contraction of this muscle is followed by the all the four gill arches. Lightoller (1939) in sliding of the epibranchial over the Elasmobranch used the term pars branchialis and pharyngobranchial. pars inscriptionalis. This has given rise to the The epiarcualia obliqui arises only from the abductor and adductor muscle units of teleostean fourth epibranchial in H. fossilis and Notopterus fishes (Munshi and Hughes (1992). notopterus and slide the epibranchial over the

75

Tumbahangfe, Subba and Prasad / Our Nature (2018), 16 (1): 74-79

Figure 1. Branchial muscles: (a), (b), (c), and (d) Diagrammatic representation of the first, second, third and fourth gill arches showing different branchial muscles (X2 nat. size). (e) The ventral branchial muscles, their origin and insertion on the branchial arches as seen from below (X 2 nat. size). (f) Lateral view of the deeper part of the branchial cavity after the removal of the first gill arch to show the branchial muscles associated with the second, third and fourth gill arches X.2 nat. size. Abbreviations:Abd Mus= abductor muscles, Add Mus= Adductor muscles, Cera. hy.= Ceratohyal, Cera.br. = Ceratobrachial, Cor. br.= Coracobranchial, Epi. arc. obliq.= Epiarualia oblique, Epi .arc. rect.= Epiarcualia recti, Epi.br. = Epibranchial, Gl= Gill, Gl.rkr= Gill raker, Lev. arc. br.= Levatores arcuum brachialium, Oes= Oesophagus, Pr .gll.ml.= Primary gill lamellae, Sub arc oblq= Subarcualia obliqui, Sub. arc. rect.= Subarculia recti, Sub. arc.tran.= Subarculia transverse,nat.=natural.

7476

Tumbahangfe, Subba and Prasad / Our Nature (2018), 16 (1): 74-79

Table 1. Branchial muscles of N. hexagonolepis (McCleland) Muscles 1st gill arch 2nd gill arch 3rd gill arch 4th gill arch Function a) Constrictores branchiales (constrictor branchialis) i) Abductor muscles between the heads of present present Present Present For the movement of the gill gill rays and gill arch. filaments and for opening the gill slits during coughing movements. ii) Adductor muscle between the gill rays. Present Present Present Present For the suspension of the gill arches and the widening and narrowing of the pharynx. b) Leavator archuum branchialium Present Present Present Present (Leacator arcus branchialis) 2 external 1 external 2 external 2 external 1 internal 2 internal 1 external 1 internal c) Epiarcualia obliqui (Epiarcualis Absent Absent Present Present Bring epi- and obliquus) present between epi and ceratobrachial arches pharyngobranchial of the same arch. together d) Epiarcualia recti (Epiarcualis rectus) in Absent Absent Absent Absent Approximately the dorsal the dorsal interarcual muscle. parts of the arches. e) Epiarcualia transversi Absent Absent Absent Absent Constriction of the floor of (Epiarcalistransversus) the pharynx. f) Attractores arcuum branchialium Absent Absent Absent Absent Approximation of the epi- and ceratobranchial joints g) Subarcualia obliqui (Subarcualis Present Present Absent Absent Forward and backward obliquus) present between cerato and movements of lower ends of hypo-branchial of the same arch. the branchial arches h) Subarcualia recti (Subarcualis rectus) Absent Absent Present Present Forward and backward covers 3rd covers 4th movements of the lower gill arch gill arch ends of the branchial arches. i) Subarcualia transversi I and II Absent Absent Present Present Constriction of the floor of (Subarcualia transversus) the pharynx coracobranchiales. There are three ,, ,, ,, ,, Connect the pectoral girdle Coracobranchials. with the central parts of the posterior branchial bars pharyngobranchial by contraction. This muscle the Y shaped third epibranchial in N. notopterus is feebly developed both in H. fossilis and N. like in the case of H. fossilis, but in case of N. notopterus. hexagonolepis only one epirculia recti muscle However, in C. batrachus there is one well develops obliquely from the second epibranchial developed and another ill-developed epicarcualia and connects with the third gill arch like in obliqui muscle represented in the third and Cyprinus carpio, C. batrachus and G. telchitta. It fourth epibranchials respectively in connection is responsible for approximation of the third and with the second pharyngobracnials. The fourth gill arches (Munshi, 1962). It acts as epiarcualia obliqui muscles, in case of N. approximator of the dorsal parts of the arches hexagonolepis show feebly developed shows similar to the epiarculia recti of C. batrachus similarity with that of cyprinid fishes viz. C. (e) The Attractores arcuum branchialium bacalla, C. mrigala and L. rohita where this (Attractor arcus branchialis): This is either ill muscle is feebly developed and are almost developed or absent not clearly visible in N. functionless hexagonopepis. (d) The Epiarcualia recti (Epiarcualis The presence of attractores arcuum rectus): Two epiarcualia recti originating from branchialium at the angle of epiceratobranchial the epibranchials of the second and fourth joint as in the case of G. telchitta and other branchial arches, one from each arch connects siluroids viz. C. batrachusand H. fossilis the other gill arches laterally with one another at (Munshi, 1961,1962) and N. notopterus the level of epibranchials (Fig. 1b). (Shrestha and Subba, 2006) is not clear or least The epiarcualia recti muscle connects the developed in the case of cyprinids viz. C. fourth gill arch with os-phrangeum in P. vulgaris bacaila, C. mrigala, L. rothita and N. for the movement of the teeth bearing organ. It hexagonolepis. arises from the tip of the short posterior limbs of

7577

Tumbahangfe, Subba and Prasad / Our Nature (2018), 16 (1): 74-79

(f) The Subarcualia oblique (Subarcualis second and lie anterior to the second which obliquus): In N. hexagonolepis this muscle is remain just above the oesophagus. The former represented in the first branchial arch by 3, seemed to bridge the third and fourth likewise in the second by 3. (Fig. 1 a, b). It ceratobranchials of one side with the partners of develops in association with respective branchial the other side. The muscle fibres of the arches. It acts as approximator of the cerato and subarcualiatransversi ii originate from the side hypobranchial element. Two pairs of subarcualia edge of each inferior pharyngeal bones and hold obliqui muscles have developed in relation to the them together. It lies below the fourth branchial first two branchial arches of N. notopterus and C. arch. (Fig. 1 e) The subarcualia obliqui, carpio. The similar situation was observed in subarculia recti and subarcualia transversi are case of N. hexagonolepis. In this respect, it is together known as the muscles of subarcuales similar to C. batrachus (Munshi 1961) and H. ventrales. fossilis (Munshi, 1962), Amphipnous cuchia The subarcualia transversi are sheets of (Munshi and Singh, 1968) and G. telchitta muscles situated transversely. In disposition, the (Subba and Ghosh,1999). The subarcualia two sheets of subarcualia transverse muscle of oblique muscles present in siluroids such as C. G. telchitta resemble to those of C. bacalia batrachus, H. fossilis and G. telchita are (Singh 1967) and H. fossilis (Munshi, 1962) but unforked, whereas it is normally forked in case it differs from C. batrachus (Munshi, 1961) of certain cyprinid viz. L. rohita in its where the two sheets are very closely situated. In disposition, number and function. Forked G. mullya, another hill stream fish the muscle is subarculiaobliqui were observed in N. represented by only one sheet situated much hexagonolepis. These muscles originate from the beyond the position of branchial arches to hold fourth ceratobranchials and run upwards to the interior pharyngeal bones together (Saxena, become inserted on the third hypobranchials in 1960). case of siluroidsbut in the case of cyprinoid (i) The Coracobranchiales (Coracobranchi- fishes viz, L. rohita and C. mrigala in which the alis): Three pairs of coracobranchiales were ceratohyals are connected with ceratobranchials observed in N. hexagonolepis. The first and by the recti muscles. The latter situation was second pairs are ovate. The first pair is located recorded in case of N. hexagonolepis. ventral to the oesophagus. Their broader parts (g) The Subarcualia recti (Subarcualis touch each other but their tapered portions rectus): The subarcualia recti muscles arise from remain being departed each other forming V- the second, third and fourth gill arches. The shaped structure and the tapered parts get subarcualia recti of the second gill arch runs inserted beneath the boarder parts of the second forward over the first gill arch to become pair which are also more or less similar to the inserted on the ceratohyal of the hyoid arch. It first pair but they are shorter than the former and develops from its hypobranchial (Fig. 1e). The form inverted V (Fig. 1e). The third pair is subarcualia recti of the third gill arch originate spindle shaped and remain covering the first and from its hypobranchial and become inserted on second from their sides (Fig. 1e). The muscles of the ceratohyal of the second gill arch. Similarly, all the coracobranchiales originate from the the next subarcualia recti take its origin from the different regions of of the pectoral fourth gill arch and inserts on the third girdle and remain between the fourth pairs of ceratohyal. Thus, the three recti muscles do branchialis (Fig. 1e). connect the ventral ends of our arches with each In N. hexagonopepis, the inferior other. The forward and backward movements of pharyngeal is connected with ventral parts the lower ends of the branchial arches to show of the posterior branchial bars by two sheets of their activities with the help of these obliquely situated muscles, collectively called muscles.These muscles show similarity with coracobranchiales as observed in a cyprinoid other cyprinids viz.L.rohita and c.mrigala but fish, C. bacaila (Singh, 1967). The coracobran- differ with siluroids fishes in their disposition chiales on the basis of their position is named and functions external and internal. The subdivision of the (h) The Subarcualia transverse (subarcualis coracobranchiales is regarded as a primitive transversus): In N. hexagonolepis, two subarculia condition of the muscle in transversi namely subarcualia transversi i. and (Nelson,1967). Interestingly the coracobran- subarcualia transversi ii. were observed. The chiales have not been observed in C. batrachus subarcualia transversi i. are stouter than the and H. fossilis (Munshi, 1961, 1962).

7678

Tumbahangfe, Subba and Prasad / Our Nature (2018), 16 (1): 74-79

On the basis of the present observations it anatomy of the mandibular and hyoid arches and may be concluded that the branchial muscles of their musculature. Trans. Zool. Soc., Lond. 24: N. hexagonolepis closely resemble cyprinid 394-444. fishes. The branchial muscles in N. Munshi, J.S.D. 1961. The accessory respiratory hexagonolepis, G. mullya (Saxena, 1960), C. organs of Clarias batrachus (Linn.). J. Morph. 109: 115-140. capio, C. bacaila (Singh, 1967) show much Munshi, J.S.D. 1962. On the assessor respiratory similarity in their general plan and both have oragans of Heteropneuste sfossilis. Proc. Roy. well developed coracobranchales. But the Soc. Edin 68: 128-146. numbers of coracobranchiales observed in N. Munshi, J.S.D. and G.M. Hughes 1992. Air breathing hexagonolepis were two pairs. fishes of Inida: Their structure, function and life Presence of coracobranchiales seems to be a history. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. cyprinid character as has been observed in G. New Delhi. 338p. mullya (Saxena, 1960) and C. bacaila (Singh, Munshi, J.S.D. and B.N. Singh 1968. On the 1967), and are absent in most siluroid fishes. respiratory organs of Amphipnous cuchia (Ham. Buch). J. Morph. 124: 423-444. Nelson,G.J.1967. Branchial Muscles in some Acknowledgements generalized Teleostean fishes.Acta. Zoologica.Bd, The authors thankfully acknowledge the sincere 277-288. help extended by Mr. Gyan Bahadur Shrestha, Rauther, M. 1925. Die syngnathiden des Golfa di Mrs. Keshika Shrestha, Kalpana Shrestha and Nepoli, Publicatondellastatione di Naapoli, 364 their family members of Dumrebesi, Dhankuta in Monographia. fish collection. Reiss. J.A. 1881. De bauder Kiemenblaffer beiden knochen fishean. Arch. Natur-gesch. 47: 518-550. References Saxena, S.C. 1960. The cranial musculature of a hill Bijtel, J.H. 1947. The mechanism of movement of the stream cyprinoid fish, Garra mullya (Skyes). gill filament in Telostei. Experimentia, Basel. 3: Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci., India 26(4): 176-188. 158-160. Shrestha, P. and B.R. Subba 2006. Branchial muscles Bijtel, J.H. 1949. The structure and the mechanism of of Notopterus notupterus (Pallas) and Cyprinus the movement of the gill filaments in teleostei. carpio communis (Linnaeus). In Natural Resource Arch. Neeri. Zool. Bd. 8: 267-288. Management (Karmacharya, S.B., M.R. Dhakal, Duvernoy, M. 1839. Du mechanism de la respiration S.N. Jha, T.N. Mandal, M.K. Chhetri, B.R. Subba, dons less poisons. Ann des sciences naturelles, see U. Koirala, B. Niroula and K.P. Limbu Eds.). sere Tome 13. Nepal Biological Society, Biratnagar and Edgeworh, F.H. 1935. The cranial muscles of Ecological Society, Kathmandu, Nepal. pp. 316- . Cambridge University press, 327. Cambridge. Singh, B.R. 1967. Branchial muscles and their mode Kesteven, H.L. 1942-43. The evolution of the skull of working in some Cyprinoids. Ind. J. Zool. 8(1): and cephalic muscles, a comparative study of their 1-12. development and adult morphology part I. The Subba, B.R. and T.K. Ghosh 1999. Branchial muscles fishes. Mem. Austr. Museum, Sydney 8: 1-63, 63- of a hill-stream Silluroid fish, Glyptothorax 132. telchitta (Ham.). J. Freshwater Biol. 11(1-2): 53- Lightoller, G.H.S. 1939. A study of the comparative 59.

7779