DOCSLIB.ORG

Osteichthyan Feeding and Respiration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Osteichthyan Feeding and Respiration Contributions to Zoology, 72 (I) 17-37 (2003) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague The clavobranchialis musculature in sarcopterygian fishes, and contribution to osteichthyan feeding and respiration Zerina Johanson Palaeontology, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia, e-mail: [email protected] Keywords:: Clavobranchiales, Sarcopterygii, Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, coracobranchiales, Dipnoi, Neoceratodus, Strepsodus Abstract Introduction Various fossil distinct the lungfish taxa preserve depressions on Muscles originating on pectoral girdle and in- the smooth postbranchial lamina ofthe dermal pectoral girdle. serting anteriorly on the mandible and branchial These depressions are largely unknown in other sarcopterygian arches depress or lower the mandible, hyoid arch, fishes, are but present in the rhizodont sarcopterygian Strepsodus. and more posterior gill arches. Of these muscles, Comparisons extant fishes these with actinopterygian suggest much of the research into ver- depressions mark the point of origin for the clavobranchialis gnathostome (jawed and has musculature, extending anterodorsally into the gill chamber to tebrates) feeding respiration focused on the insert on the ventral surface ofthe Studios ceratobranchial(s). sternohyoideus and coracomandibularis. The sterno- examining feeding and respiratory mechanisms ofbony fishes hyoideus (= rectus cervicus) attaches to the ventral (Osteichthyes) have emphasised the role of mandibular depres- of the hyoid arch and lowers the mandible within the oral portions sion in generating negative pressures cavity to draw in via the the latter run- water/air/food via suction. However, phylogenetically mandibulohyoid ligament, basal dorsal and actinopterygians, fossil lungfish and other fossil sarcoptc- ning between the ceratohyal the rear of rygians (such as Strepsodus) lack the apomorphies that increase the mandible (Lauder, 1979, 1980, 1982, 1983a, b, suction among bony fishes. In these taxa the clavobranchialis 1985; Lauder& Shaffer, 1985; Bemis, 1987; Bemis muscles to this re- may serve augment negative pressure by & Lauder, 1986; Shaffer & Lauder, 1985; & the Reilly tracting ceratobranchialsand increasing the size of the oral/ Lauder, 1990). This was described as a oropharyngeal cavity. A comparable action is performed by the general- ised the chondrichthyan coracobranchiales muscles, particularly during mechanism for Gnathostomata, occurring feeding, and the is function of these ventral gill arch muscles in acanthodians, actinopterygians, extant lungfishes, likely to be a synapomorphy of jawed vertebrates (Gnatho- coclacanths (the latter two groups representing the stomata). This musculature is absent from jawless vertebrates such Sarcopterygii) and aquatic salamanders as the Osteostraci. piscine (Lau- der, 1980, 1982, 1985; Bemis & Lauder, 1986; Campbell & Barwick, 1987, 1988a, 1999; Maisey, Contents 1989; Reilly & Lauder, 1990). Attachment surfaces for the sternohyoideus muscle and mandibulohyoid Introduction are also in various fossil sarco- 17 ligament preserved Materials ‘ and methods 18 pterygian taxa including Eusthenopteron (Jarvik, The dermal pectoral girdle of fossil sarcopterygians and 1980), Gogonasus (Long et ah, 1997: figs 39, 48B, associated muscle attachments 19 D), Medoevia (Lebedev, 1995: fig. 18B), The Glyptolepis role of the clavobranchialis in feeding and respira- 1972: and several fossil tion (Jarvik, fig. 28), lungfishes 2'j 1977; et ah, 1993; & Bar- Discussion 30 (Miles, Wang Campbell Conclusions Barwick & 33 wick, 1988a, 2002; Campbell, 1996; Acknowledgements ' KSW 33 Campbell, pers. comm. 2002). However, re- References 34 cent research on the chondrichthyan musculature 18 Z. Johanson - Clavobranchialis musculature in fossil lungfishes questioned the function ofthe mandibulohyoid liga- (Lauder, 1979, 1982, 1983a, b; Bemis & Lauder, in this the main muscle fossil ment group. Rather, lowering 1986). Nevertheless, among sarcopterygians, the mandible was the coracomandibularis, inserting a variety of fossil lungfish possess well developed at the symphysis of the chondrichthyan lower jaw muscle attachment surfaces on the postbranchial (Wilga et ah, 2000). laminae of the pectoral girdle. Comparable attach- As the mandibleis loweredand the mouth opened, ment surfaces occur on the clavicles of the rhizodont negative pressure (suction) created within the oral sarcopterygian fish Strepsodus. These surfaces may draws in aerated and food indicate the of clavobranchiales cavity water (or air) presence a com- materials. Mandibular depression was said to cre- parable to various actinopterygians (Jessen, 1972), in ate the greatest change in the volume of the oral and the size of the depression lungfish such as cavity and provide the greatest contribution to this Griphognathus indicates that the muscles themselves could be of substantial size. negative pressure (Lauder, 1985). Additionally, actinopterygians (e.g., Alexander, 1969, 1970; Liem, As described below, the action of ventral gill arch have both 1970; Lauder, 1983b), lepidosirenid lungfish (Pro- depressors may improved feeding topterus and Lepidosiren (Bemis, 1987; Bemis & and respiratory efficiency by increasing the rate at Lauder, 1986)) and aquatic salamanders (Lauder which water/food/air is brought into the oral cav- & Shaffer, 1985) modify various aspects of their ity in chondrichthyans, sarcopterygians and actino- jaws, skull, gill arch, pectoral girdle and muscle pterygians, and particularly in phylogenetically basal increase of the latter Evidence for the morphology to negative pressure gener- taxa two groups. pres- ated within the oral cavity. These modifications serve ence of these muscles and active branchial arch to increase the flow of water/air into the mouth, depression can also be found in certain fossil gnatho- improving the efficiency of both respiration and stomes such as the Placodermi, suggesting the ac- feeding. By comparison, fossil sarcopterygians (in- tion of this gill arch musculature in feeding and cluding non-lepidosirenid lungfish) appear to lack respiration occurs throughout jawed fishes. By com- these modifications, as do fossil and phylogenetically parison, the action of the sternohyoideus muscle in basal actinopterygians (Lauder, 1980, 1982), and lowering the mandible and opening the mouth the within the mouth via the arch and negative pressure generated hyoid mandibulohyoid liga- cavity of these taxa was considered to be relatively ment, described as a feature of the Gnathostomata low (Lauder, 1980). (e.g., Lauder, 1980, 1982), does not occur in chon- However, little consideration has been given in drichthyans (Wilga et ah, 2000), nor in placoderms these discussions to the musculature responsible (Johanson, in press). In these taxa the coracomandi- for the more and the the depressing posterior gill arches, bularis, inserting at jaw symphysis, opens its role in expanding and increasing the volume of mouth. the oropharyngeal cavity during the initial stages of feeding and respiration. These muscles, in- cluding the clavobranchiales in osteichthyans and Materials and methods the coracobranchiales in chondrichthyans, originate on (or in association with) the pectoral girdle and Specimens illustrated were either photographed after insert on the ventral the surfaces of branchial arches being coated with an ammonium chloride sublimate evidence indi- scanned in (ceratobranchials). Experimental (Figs 3, 4, 5) or from various publica- cates that the coracobranchialesact chondrichthyan tions (Figs 1, 2, 7). Line drawings (Fig. 6) were to the branchial basket depress during feeding made directly from photographs. In Figure 8, a 25 (Moss, 1977; Mallatt, Motta 1997: 1996; et ah, cm long individual of the lungfish Neoceratodus lig. 4), a link the indicating between activity of was cut by hand into sections and photographed these muscles and the movement of and Institutional water food on a light table. abbreviations: AMF: into the mouth. Similar of activity the clavobran- Australian Museum, Sydney; QMF: Queensland chialis has musculature not been examined in sarco- Museum, Brisbane. pterygians (extant lungfish) nor in actinopterygians Contributions to Zoology, 72 (I) - 2003 19 The dermal pectoral girdle of fossil and includes the Porolepiformes, inwhich the lamina sarcoptery-gians and associated muscle can be relatively wide with no indication of mus- attachments attachments cle present (Jarvik, 1972). Youngolepis (Chang, 1991) is also assigned to the Dipnomorpha The dermal pectoral girdle of fossil sarcopterygians (Ahlberg, 1991) and its postbranchial lamina ap- is well known be covered in dermal (e.g., Andrews & Westoll, 1970a, b; pears to ornament (also the Jarvik, 1972, 1980; Miles, 1977; Long, 1989; Fox onychodont Strunius) rather than smooth. The Tetra- et ah, 1995; Lebedev, 1995; Ahlberg & Johanson, podomorpha include taxa more closely related to Johanson than 1997; & Ahlberg, 1997). Among these, a the Tetrapoda the Dipnoi (lungfish) and gen- of reduced variety fossil lungfish including Sagenodus, Eoc- erally possess postbranchial lamina, often tenodus, Pillararhynchus, Holodipterus, Gripho- only represented by a narrow, unornamented strip gnathus, Chirodipterus and Ctenodus (Watson & along the dorsomedial margin of the cleithrum and Gill, 1923; Miles, 1977; Long, 1987; Pridmore et clavicle (Jarvik, 1972, 1980; Fox et ah, 1995; Le- ah, 1994; Barwick & Campbell, 1996; Campbell bedev, 1995). However, distinct depressions are & associated with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identifying Heterogeneity in Rates of Morphological Evolution: Discrete Character Change in the Evolution of Lungfish (Sarcopterygii; Dipnoi)
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01460.x IDENTIFYING HETEROGENEITY IN RATES OF MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION: DISCRETE CHARACTER CHANGE IN THE EVOLUTION OF LUNGFISH (SARCOPTERYGII; DIPNOI) Graeme T. Lloyd,1,2 Steve C. Wang,3 and Stephen L. Brusatte4,5 1Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania 19081 4Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024 5Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10025 Received February 9, 2010 Accepted August 15, 2011 Data Archived: Dryad: doi:10.5061/dryad.pg46f Quantifying rates of morphological evolution is important in many macroevolutionary studies, and critical when assessing possible adaptive radiations and episodes of punctuated equilibrium in the fossil record. However, studies of morphological rates of change have lagged behind those on taxonomic diversification, and most authors have focused on continuous characters and quantifying patterns of morphological rates over time. Here, we provide a phylogenetic approach, using discrete characters and three statistical tests to determine points on a cladogram (branches or entire clades) that are characterized by significantly high or low rates of change. These methods include a randomization approach that identifies branches with significantly high rates and likelihood ratio tests that pinpoint either branches or clades that have significantly higher or lower rates than the pooled rate of the remainder of the tree. As a test case for these methods, we analyze a discrete character dataset of lungfish, which have long been regarded as “living fossils” due to an apparent slowdown in rates since the Devonian.
    [Show full text]
  • New Locality for Lepidosiren Paradoxa (Fitzinger, 1837)(Dipnoi
    13 3 the journal of 2118 biodiversity data 20 May 2017 Check List NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 13(3): 2118, 20 May 2017 https://doi.org/10.15560/13.3.2118 ISSN 1809-127X © 2017 Check List and Authors New locality for Lepidosiren paradoxa (Fitzinger, 1837) (Dipnoi: Lepidosirenidae) in Argentina Evelyn Romina Vallone Laboratorio de Paleontología de Vertebrados, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción (CICyTTP-CONICET), Materi y España, 3105 Diamante, ER, Argentina E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This study documents a new locality of the lungfish was caught by a local fisherman in shallow waters (depth of Lepidosiren paradoxa on the coast of the Entre Rios Province approximately 3 m) in a coastal area of the locality of Gen- in the lower Paraná River. This finding represents the third eral Alvear, Entre Ríos Province, Argentina (31°55ʹ27.60ʺ S, southern record of this species on southern of South America. 060°39ʹ45.52ʺ W) (Fig. 1). After collection, the specimen was Additionally, as this region has been relatively well sampled frozen and transported to the laboratory for identification. The both during past decades and currently, I discuss possible specimen was identified according to diagnosis of Ringuelet reasons why this new specimen has been observed only et al. (1967) then deposited in the Fish Collection of the Labo- recently. ratorio de Vertebrados, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Key words. South American lungfish; Entre Ríos; Paraná River Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción (CICyTTP-V-18, Diamante, Entre Ríos, Argentina). The description follows the anatomical nomenclature proposed by Ringuelet et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Chondrichthyes:Elasmobranchi)
    Dissertação de Mestrado Lucas Romero de Oliveira Anatomia comparada e importância filogenética da musculatura branquial em tubarões da superordem Galeomorphi (Chondrichthyes:Elasmobranchi) Comparative anatomy and phylogenetic importance of the branchial musculature in sharks of the superorder Galeomorphi (Chondrichthyes:Elasmobranchi) Instituto de Biociências – Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Novembro de 2017 1 Dissertação de Mestrado Lucas Romero de Oliveira Anatomia comparada e importância filogenética da musculatura branquial em tubarões da superordem Galeomorphi (Chondrichthyes:Elasmobranchi) Compartive anatomy and phylogenetic importance of the branchial musculature in sharks of the superorder Galeomorphi (Chondrichthyes:Elasmobranchi) Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo para a obtenção de Título de Mestre em Zoologia, na Área de Anatomia comparada Supervisora: Mônica de Toledo Piza Ragazzo Instituto de Biociências – Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Novembro de 2017 2 Introduction Extant sharks are currently divided into two monophyletic groups based on morphological (Compagno, 1977; Shirai, 1992a, 1992b, 1996; de Carvalho, 1996; de Carvalho & Maisey, 1996) and molecular (Douady et al., 2003; Winchell et al. 2004; Naylor et al., 2005, 2012; Human et al., 2006; Heinicke et al., 2009)data: Galeomorphi and Squalomorphi. Molecular data support that rays, forming a group named Batoidea, are the sister-group to a clade comprising both galeomorph and squalomorph sharks. Results from many older morphological studies also considered both body plans (sharks and rays) as indicative of monophyletic groups, but some recent works based on morphological data suggested that rays form a monophyletic group nested within squalomorph sharks (Shirai, 1992; de Carvalho & Maisey, 1996; de Carvalho, 1996). In studies based on both types of dataset, the Galeomorphi comprehend only shark groups.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CLASSIFICATION and EVOLUTION of the HETEROSTRACI Since 1858, When Huxley Demonstrated That in the Histological Struc
    ACTA PALAEONT OLOGICA POLONICA Vol. VII 1 9 6 2 N os. 1-2 L. BEVERLY TARLO THE CLASSIFICATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE HETEROSTRACI Abstract. - An outline classification is given of the Hetero straci, with diagnoses . of th e following orders and suborders: Astraspidiformes, Eriptychiiformes, Cya­ thaspidiformes (Cyathaspidida, Poraspidida, Ctenaspidida), Psammosteiformes (Tes­ seraspidida, Psarnmosteida) , Traquairaspidiformes, Pteraspidiformes (Pte ras pidida, Doryaspidida), Cardipeltiformes and Amphiaspidiformes (Amphiaspidida, Hiber­ naspidida, Eglonaspidida). It is show n that the various orders fall into four m ain evolutionary lineages ~ cyathaspid, psammosteid, pteraspid and amphiaspid, and these are traced from primitive te ssellated forms. A tentative phylogeny is pro­ posed and alternatives are discussed. INTRODUCTION Since 1858, when Huxley demonstrated that in the histological struc­ ture of their dermal bone Cephalaspis and Pteraspis were quite different from one another, it has been recognized that there were two distinct groups of ostracoderms for which Lankester (1868-70) proposed the names Osteostraci and Heterostraci respectively. Although these groups are generally considered to be related to on e another, Lankester belie­ ved that "the Heterostraci are at present associated with the Osteostraci because they are found in the same beds, because they have, like Cepha­ laspis, a large head shield, and because there is nothing else with which to associate them". In 1889, Cop e united these two groups in the Ostracodermi which, together with the modern cyclostomes, he placed in the Class Agnatha, and although this proposal was at first opposed by Traquair (1899) and Woodward (1891b), subsequent work has shown that it was correct as both the Osteostraci and the Heterostraci were agnathous.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carboniferous Evolution of Nova Scotia
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 The Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia J. H. CALDER Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 698, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2T9 Abstract: Nova Scotia during the Carboniferous lay at the heart of palaeoequatorial Euramerica in a broadly intermontane palaeoequatorial setting, the Maritimes-West-European province; to the west rose the orographic barrier imposed by the Appalachian Mountains, and to the south and east the Mauritanide-Hercynide belt. The geological affinity of Nova Scotia to Europe, reflected in elements of the Carboniferous flora and fauna, was mirrored in the evolution of geological thought even before the epochal visits of Sir Charles Lyell. The Maritimes Basin of eastern Canada, born of the Acadian-Caledonian orogeny that witnessed the suture of Iapetus in the Devonian, and shaped thereafter by the inexorable closing of Gondwana and Laurasia, comprises a near complete stratal sequence as great as 12 km thick which spans the Middle Devonian to the Lower Permian. Across the southern Maritimes Basin, in northern Nova Scotia, deep depocentres developed en echelon adjacent to a transform platelet boundary between terranes of Avalon and Gondwanan affinity. The subsequent history of the basins can be summarized as distension and rifting attended by bimodal volcanism waning through the Dinantian, with marked transpression in the Namurian and subsequent persistence of transcurrent movement linking Variscan deformation with Mauritainide-Appalachian convergence and Alleghenian thrusting. This Mid- Carboniferous event is pivotal in the Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia. Rapid subsidence adjacent to transcurrent faults in the early Westphalian was succeeded by thermal sag in the later Westphalian and ultimately by basin inversion and unroofing after the early Permian as equatorial Pangaea finally assembled and subsequently rifted again in the Triassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Megapleuronzange3321schu.Pdf
    UNIVERSE ftJJMOlS H URBA^-CHAMPAIGN LXLOGY b i/FIELDIANA J/ Geology Published by Field Museum of Natural History Volume 33, No. 21 January 28,1977 This volume is dedicated to Dr. Rainer Zangerl Megapleuron zangerli A New Dipnoan from the Pennsylvanian, Illinois HANS-PETER SCHULTZE APL. PROFESSOR GEOL.-PALXONT. INSTITUT, UNIVERSITXT GOTTINGEN ABSTRACT Megapleuron rochei Gaudry 1881 from the lower Permian of France is redescribed. Small juvenile specimens from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Illinois are placed in the same genus as the new species M. zangerli. The genus differs from all other contem- poraneous dipnoans in the arrangement of the bones in the skull roof. INTRODUCTION Denison ( 1969, pp. 208-209) described but did not name two juve- nile dipnoans with the tooth-plates in an early stage of develop- ment. A few additional specimens of the species have since been collected. The best preserved specimen, chosen as the type of a new species, was given first to Dr. D. Baird, Princeton, who offered it to me for description during my stay at Field Museum, Chicago. After realizing that the pattern of the bones of the skull roof differs from that in Sagenodus, I found an identical pattern in the poorly pre- served type and only specimen of Megapleuron rochei Gaudry 1881. The type specimen of M. rochei will be described first for proper comparison with the specimens from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Illinois. During my stay at Field Museum, I prepared polysulfide rubber casts of all specimens. These casts and the specimens have been investigated in Field Museum and in the GeoL-PalSont.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndromes of the First and Second Branchial Arches, Part 1: Embryology and Characteristic REVIEW ARTICLE Defects
    Syndromes of the First and Second Branchial Arches, Part 1: Embryology and Characteristic REVIEW ARTICLE Defects J.M. Johnson SUMMARY: A variety of congenital syndromes affecting the face occur due to defects involving the G. Moonis first and second BAs. Radiographic evaluation of craniofacial deformities is necessary to define aberrant anatomy, plan surgical procedures, and evaluate the effects of craniofacial growth and G.E. Green surgical reconstructions. High-resolution CT has proved vital in determining the nature and extent of R. Carmody these syndromes. The radiologic evaluation of syndromes of the first and second BAs should begin H.N. Burbank first by studying a series of isolated defects: CL with or without CP, micrognathia, and EAC atresia, which compose the major features of these syndromes and allow more specific diagnosis. After discussion of these defects and the associated embryology, we proceed to discuss the VCFS, PRS, ACS, TCS, Stickler syndrome, and HFM. ABBREVIATIONS: ACS ϭ auriculocondylar syndrome; BA ϭ branchial arch; CL ϭ cleft lip; CL/P ϭ cleft lip/palate; CP ϭ cleft palate; EAC ϭ external auditory canal; HFM ϭ hemifacial microsomia; MDCT ϭ multidetector CT; PRS ϭ Pierre Robin sequence; TCS ϭ Treacher Collins syndrome; VCFS ϭ velocardiofacial syndrome adiographic evaluation of craniofacial deformities is nec- major features of the syndromes of the first and second BAs. Ressary to define aberrant anatomy, plan surgical proce- Part 2 of this review discusses the syndromes and their radio- dures, and evaluate the effects of craniofacial growth and sur- graphic features: PRS, HFM, ACS, TCS, Stickler syndrome, gical reconstructions.1 The recent rapid proliferation of and VCFS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Redescription of the Lungfish Eoctenodus Hills 1929, with Reassessment of Other Australian Records of the Genus Dipterns Sedgwick & Murchison 1828
    Ree. West. Aust. Mus. 1987, 13 (2): 297-314 A redescription of the lungfish Eoctenodus Hills 1929, with reassessment of other Australian records of the genus Dipterns Sedgwick & Murchison 1828. J.A. Long* Abstract Eoctenodus microsoma Hills 1929 (= Dipterus microsoma Hills, 1931) from the Frasnian Blue Range Formation, near Taggerty, Victoria, is found to be a valid genus, differing from Dipterus, and other dipnoans, by the shape of the parasphenoid and toothplates. The upper jaw toothp1ates and entopterygoids, parasphenoid, c1eithrum, anoc1eithrum and scales of Eoctenodus are described. Eoctenodus may represent the earliest member of the Ctenodontidae. Dipterus cf. D. digitatus. from the Late Devonian Gneudna Formation, Western Australia (Seddon, 1969), is assigned to Chirodipterus australis Miles 1977; and Dipterus sp. from the Late Devonian of Gingham Gap, New South Wales (Hills, 1936) is thought to be con­ generic with a dipnoan of similar age from the Hunter Siltstone, New South Wales. This form differs from Dipterus in the shape of the parasphenoid. The genus Dipterus appears to be restricted to the Middle-Upper Devonian of Europe, North America and the USSR (Laurasia). Introduction Although Hills (1929) recognised a new dipnoan, Eoctenodus microsoma, in the Late Devonian fish remains from the Blue Range Formation, near Taggerty, he later (Hills 1931) altered the generic status of this species after a study trip to Britain in which D,M.S. Watson pointed out similarities between the Australian form and the British genus Dipterus Sedgwick and Murchison 1828. Studies of the head of Dipterus by Westoll (1949) and White (1965) showed the structure of the palate and, in particular, the shape of the parasphenoid which differs from that in the Taggerty dipnoan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lungfish Survivor of the End-Devonian Extinction and an Early Carboniferous Dipnoan
    1 A Lungfish survivor of the end-Devonian extinction and an Early Carboniferous dipnoan 2 radiation. 3 4 Tom J. Challands1*, Timothy R. Smithson,2 Jennifer A. Clack2, Carys E. Bennett3, John E. A. 5 Marshall4, Sarah M. Wallace-Johnson5, Henrietta Hill2 6 7 1School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh, 8 EH9 3FE, UK. email: [email protected]; tel: +44 (0) 131 650 4849 9 10 2University Museum of Zoology Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. 11 12 3Department of Geology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK. 13 14 4School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, 15 European Way, University Road, Southampton, SO14 3ZH , UK. 16 17 5Sedgwick Museum, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing St., 18 Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK 1 19 Abstract 20 21 Until recently the immediate aftermath of the Hangenberg event of the Famennian Stage (Upper 22 Devonian) was considered to have decimated sarcopterygian groups, including lungfish, with only 23 two taxa, Occludus romeri and Sagenodus spp., being unequivocally recorded from rocks of 24 Tournaisian age (Mississippian, Early Carboniferous). Recent discoveries of numerous 25 morphologically diverse lungfish tooth plates from southern Scotland and northern England indicate 26 that at least ten dipnoan taxa existed during the earliest Carboniferous. Of these taxa, only two, 27 Xylognathus and Ballgadus, preserve cranial and post-cranial skeletal elements that are yet to be 28 described. Here we present a description of the skull of a new genus and species of lungfish, 29 Limanichthys fraseri gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocephalan Embryos Provide Evidence for Gill Arch Appendage Reduction and Opercular Evolution in Cartilaginous fishes
    Holocephalan embryos provide evidence for gill arch appendage reduction and opercular evolution in cartilaginous fishes J. Andrew Gillisa,1, Kate A. Rawlinsonb, Justin Bellc, Warrick S. Lyond, Clare V. H. Bakera, and Neil H. Shubine,1 aDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, United Kingdom; bDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT United Kingdom; cDepartment of Primary Industries, Marine and Freshwater Fisheries Resource Institute, Queenscliff, Victoria 3225, Australia; dNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hataitai, Wellington 6021, New Zealand; and eDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 Edited by Sean B. Carroll, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, and approved December 15, 2010 (received for review August 31, 2010) Chondrichthyans possess endoskeletal appendages called branchial extensive analyses, including exceptionally complete material of the rays that extend laterally from their hyoid and gill-bearing (bran- stethacanthid Akmonistion zangerli (11), however, suggest an al- chial) arches. Branchial ray outgrowth, like tetrapod limb out- ternative placement of key ray-bearing taxa. These analyses resolve growth, is maintained by Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. In limbs, Cladoselache and the symmoriids (including the hyoid plus gill arch distal endoskeletal elements fail to form in the absence of normal ray-bearing Akmonistion) as paraphyletic stem-group
    [Show full text]
  • I Ecomorphological Change in Lobe-Finned Fishes (Sarcopterygii
    Ecomorphological change in lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii): disparity and rates by Bryan H. Juarez A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2015 Master’s Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Lauren C. Sallan, University of Pennsylvania, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Daniel L. Rabosky, Co-Chair Associate Research Scientist Miriam L. Zelditch i © Bryan H. Juarez 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Rabosky Lab, David W. Bapst, Graeme T. Lloyd and Zerina Johanson for helpful discussions on methodology, Lauren C. Sallan, Miriam L. Zelditch and Daniel L. Rabosky for their dedicated guidance on this study and the London Natural History Museum for courteously providing me with access to specimens. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF APPENDICES v ABSTRACT vi SECTION I. Introduction 1 II. Methods 4 III. Results 9 IV. Discussion 16 V. Conclusion 20 VI. Future Directions 21 APPENDICES 23 REFERENCES 62 iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE/FIGURE II. Cranial PC-reduced data 6 II. Post-cranial PC-reduced data 6 III. PC1 and PC2 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 11-12 III. Cranial Disparity Through Time 13 III. Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 14 III. Cranial/Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 15 v LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Lobe-fins 24 B. Species Used In Analysis 34 C. Cranial and Post-Cranial Landmarks 37 D. PC3 and PC4 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 38 E. PC1 PC2 Cranial Morphospaces 39 1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Development in the Shark Scyliorhinus Canicula: Implications for the Evolution of the Gnathostome Head and Paired Appendage Musculature Janine M
    Ziermann et al. Frontiers in Zoology (2017) 14:31 DOI 10.1186/s12983-017-0216-y RESEARCH Open Access Muscle development in the shark Scyliorhinus canicula: implications for the evolution of the gnathostome head and paired appendage musculature Janine M. Ziermann1*, Renata Freitas2,3 and Rui Diogo4 Abstract Background: The origin of jawed vertebrates was marked by profound reconfigurations of the skeleton and muscles of the head and by the acquisition of two sets of paired appendages. Extant cartilaginous fish retained numerous plesiomorphic characters of jawed vertebrates, which include several aspects of their musculature. Therefore, myogenic studies on sharks are essential in yielding clues on the developmental processes involved in the origin of the muscular anatomy. Results: Here we provide a detailed description of the development of specific muscular units integrating the cephalic and appendicular musculature of the shark model, Scyliorhinus canicula. In addition, we analyze the muscle development across gnathostomes by comparing the developmental onset of muscle groups in distinct taxa. Our data reveal that appendicular myogenesis occurs earlier in the pectoral than in the pelvic appendages. Additionally, the pectoral musculature includes muscles that have their primordial developmental origin in the head. This culminates in a tight muscular connection between the pectoral girdle and the cranium, which founds no parallel in the pelvic fins. Moreover, we identified a lateral to ventral pattern of formation of the cephalic muscles, that has been equally documented in osteichthyans but, in contrast with these gnathostomes, the hyoid muscles develop earlier than mandibular muscle in S. canicula. Conclusion: Our analyses reveal considerable differences in the formation of the pectoral and pelvic musculatures in S.
    [Show full text]