DOCSLIB.ORG

Trends in Evolution: Convergence and Divergence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trends in Evolution: Convergence and Divergence Trends in Evolution: Convergence and Divergence Trends in Evolution: Convergence and Divergence Purpose The purpose of this lesson is to reinforce the concepts of evolution by means of natural selection. Students will explore the evidence we use to determine evolutionary relationships. They will recognize how similar selective pressures can result in similar phenotypes and adaptive strategies and how species differentiate due to resource partitioning and competition when they pioneer a new environment. Audience This lesson was designed to be used in an introductory high school biology course. Lesson Objectives Upon completion of this lesson, students will be able to: ஃ model evolutionary relationships among species based data and revise the model based on additional information. ஃ determine the reliability of different forms of data and draw phylogenetic trees based upon these data. Key Words adaptive radiation, convergent evolution, ecomorph, niche, phenotype, phylogeny Big Question This lesson addresses the Big Question “What does it mean to observe?” Standard Alignments ஃ Science and Engineering Practices ஃ SP 2. D eveloping and using models ஃ SP 4. Analyzing and interpreting data ஃ SP 6 . Constructing explanations. ஃ SP 7. Engaging in argument from evidence ஃ MA Science and Technology/Engineering Standards (2016) HS-LS4-1. Communicate scientific information that common ancestry and biological evolution are supported by multiple lines of empirical evidence, including molecular, anatomical, and developmental similarities inherited from a common ancestor (homologies), seen through fossils and laboratory and field observations. Trends in Evolution: Convergence & Divergence 1 ஃ NGSS Standards (2013) ஃ HS-LS4-1. C ommunicate scientific information that common ancestry and biological evolution are supported by multiple lines of empirical evidence. ஃ HS-LS4-4. C onstruct an explanation based on evidence for how natural selection leads to adaptation of populations. Misconceptions Addressed ஃ In addition to probing tree-thinking and misconceptions related to modeling and interpreting evolutionary trees, this lesson addresses this common misconception about evolution and natural selection: The fittest individuals in a population are guaranteed to survive and reproduce, and the least fit are guaranteed not to survive and reproduce. (Question 4e) ஃ Further information about student misconceptions on this topic can be found h ere. You can find information about tree-thinking misconceptions o n the Understanding Evolution website . They also have a page on general evolution misconceptions . Primary Sources ஃ Bite “ Can A Computer Predict How Species Evolve? ” b ased on: ஃ Mahler, D. Luke, Travis Ingram, Liam J. Revell, and Jonathan B. Losos. 2013. “Exceptional Convergence on the Macroevolutionary Landscape in Island Lizard Radiations.” S cience 431(6143): 292-295. doi: 10.1126/science.1232392. ஃ Rabosky, Daniel L. and Richard E. Glor. 2010. “Equilibrium speciation dynamics in a model adaptive radiation of island lizards.” P roceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(51): 22178-22183. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007606107. ஃ Misconceptions Anderson, Diane I., Kathleen M. Fisher, and Gregory J. Norman. 2002. “ Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection.” J ournal of Research In Science and Teaching 39(10): 952–978. doi: 10.1002/tea.10053 Materials ஃ Copies of the Student Handout and Science Bite for each student. ஃ Set of A nolis lizard information cards for each pair, preferably printed in color. Time This lesson should take approximately two 50-minute class periods. Additional time may be required for introductory and/or wrap-up discussions. Student Prior Knowledge Students should be familiar with evolution by means of natural selection, interpreting and drawing phylogenetic trees, and basic ecology. Trends in Evolution: Convergence & Divergence 2 Instructions and Teacher Tips ஃ General Procedure ஃ Have students find a partner. Each pair will sit with another pair to form a group of four. Discussions will happen between members of the pair and members of the overall group. ஃ Pass out sets of “species cards” representing eight species found on two islands to each pair. ஃ Student pairs will develop a phylogenetic tree model demonstrating relatedness of the eight species based on anatomical information, then anatomical and geography/niche information, and then finally based on anatomical, geographical/niche, and genomic information. ஃ After each set of evidence is introduced, student groups of four will discuss their reasoning and evidence for their model and revise if necessary. ஃ Students answer the first two analysis questions and then read the Bite and answer remaining analysis questions. This can be done individually or as a group, in class or for homework. ஃ After students have completed the activity, consider bringing them together as a class or break into small groups to compare answers and to discuss any remaining questions. ஃ Tips, Extensions, and Variations ஃ You will need to print the species cards (ideally two slides per page, so that each page has all necessary information on one species) so they can be rearranged in a phylogeny. If possible, print these cards in color. Alternatively, if you have to print the cards in black & white, you could show the species images in color over the projector so students can refer to the color images as they complete this exercise. ஃ When you first hand out the cards, have them folded so that only the lizard image and the phenotype information are visible. When they get to the niche/geography step, have them unfold to reveal that information, only completely unfolding the cards when they get to the mock genome. ஃ As the students do this activity, it may be helpful/fun to have them physically move the cards around on a whiteboard or large sheet of butcher paper and then create their phylogeny by drawing connecting lines between the cards. This creates a way for the students to interact with the phylogeny before they formalize it and write it down on the student handout. A whiteboard is a particularly appealing option because they can easily erase and redraw the connecting lines as they rearrange the cards and modify their phylogenies in each step of this lesson. ஃ When constructing trees, remind students that they should start with the most closely related lizards and then work from the ends of the tree down the branches to the root, the common ancestor for the entire group. Trends in Evolution: Convergence & Divergence 3 ஃ When they get to the genetic information, it might be helpful to review with students that an allele is a version of a segment of DNA, such as a gene. The different circles on the mock genome represent genes, so each genome model has four genes. The different letters represent different alleles. Among the lizard species we are using, Gene 1 has one allele: A. Gene 2 has three alleles: A, B, and C. Gene 3 has 5 alleles: A, B, C, D, E. Gene 4 has seven alleles: A, C, D, E, G, F, G. ஃ If students are having a difficult time visualizing different ecomorphs, consider projecting the diagram on p age 3 of Chapter 4 from researcher Jonathan Losos’ book L izards in a Phylogenetic Tree (2011, University of California Press). ஃ If you have time, you may want to conduct a class discussion on divergent and convergent evolution. This may be done after the completion of the cards activity, prior to lesson, after reading the Bite. ஃ Using classic examples of divergent evolution, discuss how species branch out into evolutionary niches. Encourage students to come up with their own examples. Discuss effects of competition and habitat/resource partitioning and how it fuels adaptive radiation and development of analogous structures. (Examples: Darwin’s finches, Galapagos Giant Tortoises, Marsupials of Australia, Lemurs of Madagascar) ஃ Using examples of convergent evolution, discuss how species can independently derive similar characteristics due to similar selective pressures. Have students brainstorm the selective pressures that cause trends toward convergence. Ask students to come up with general examples (powered flight in insects, birds and bats) and introduce some specific examples. (Examples: anteaters/ numbat, echidna/porcupine, tasmanian tiger/wolf, sugar gliders/flying squirrels/colugo, groundhog/wombat etc.) Background Information and Research Details ஃ The lesson demonstrates how models are used to study evolutionary processes. Computer modeling of evolution is a powerful tool since we can (a) “watch” evolution progress over very long time periods (millions of years) and (b) simulate the same evolutionary events many times, so we can see which outcome is most likely. ஃ Computer models of evolution use the things we know as a starting point and are designed to answer a particular research question. The Bite explores research on A nolis lizards in the Caribbean. Scientists have been studying these animals in an evolutionary context for a long time, so we understand a lot about them. We understand their lifestyles, their adaptations to their specific habitat, their phylogenetic relationships, and each species predicted genetic ‘distance’ from their most recent common ancestor. The scientists feed the phylogenetic relationships, phenotypes, and environment into a computer model. The model has ‘adaptive peaks’, which represent the ecomorphs. The scientists found that over a long period, the Anolis lizards diversified to fill the adaptive peaks, so they could predict the similar diversification we see on each Caribbean island. Then, the model allowed multiple species to fill the same adaptive peaks, and they did, which is indicative of convergent evolution. This is a powerful tool for understanding Trends in Evolution: Convergence & Divergence 4 evolutionary processes that occur over long timer periods. You can view a full phylogeny in Figure S1 in the Rabosky & Glor (2010) paper. If you focus just on the colors of the tips, you can clearly see that species are grouped by island, with a few exceptions of course! ஃ The phylogeny shown in the bite is based on genetic data.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolution Activity, Grade 11
    Evolution Activity, Grade 11 Evolution Activities for Grade 11 Students at the Toronto Zoo 1 Evolution Activity, Grade 11 Table of Contents Pre-Zoo Activity 3-8 • Think, Pair, Share – Animals in Society and Role of Zoos 3-5 o Description 3 o Materials 3 o Four Corners Activity 6 o Background Information 7-8 Zoo Activity 9-19 • Teacher’s Notes 9-13 o General Information, Curriculum expectations, 9-10 materials, procedure o Evaluation Rubrics 11-12 o Glossary 13 • Student Assignment 14-19 o Part 1 – Mission Preparation at the Zoo 15-16 (Observation Sheets) o Part 2 – Scientific Notes 17 o Part 3 – Documentation: The Story 18 o Appendix – Animal signs 19 Evaluation 20 2 Evolution Activity, Grade 11 Suggested Pre-zoo activity Time needed : 35 minutes (or more) Type of activity : pair-share, small-group (approximately 2-3 students) Objective : encourage students to think about and evaluate the roles of animals in our society and the purposes of zoos along with their own attitudes or stands toward zoos Materials needed : a set of 8-16 statements and a mode of ranking (either above the line-below the line or diamond style ranking system) Special note : In order to manage time, teacher can chose to use any number of the statements as long as the 4 core statements listed bellow are included. Task : students work together to rank the statements about the treatment of animals. They should work together and try to negotiate a consensus, but if this is impossible they can either leave out the particular statement or write down a few lines in their notes as to why they would place them in a different category.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent Evolution in Antiherbivore Defences Within Species Complexes at a Single Amazonian Site
    Journal of Ecology 2015, 103, 1107–1118 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12431 Divergent evolution in antiherbivore defences within species complexes at a single Amazonian site Marıa-Jose Endara1*, Alexander Weinhold1, James E. Cox2, Natasha L. Wiggins1, Phyllis D. Coley1,3 and Thomas A. Kursar1,3 1Department of Biology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA; 2Health Sciences Center Core Research Facilities, School of Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA; and 3Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa Box 0843-03092, Panama Summary 1. Classic theory in plant–insect interactions has linked herbivore pressure with diversification in plant species. We hypothesize that herbivores may exert divergent selection on defences, such that closely related plant species will be more different in defensive than in non-defensive traits. 2. We evaluated this hypothesis by investigating two clades of closely related plant species coexis- ting at a single site in the Peruvian Amazon: Inga capitata Desv. and Inga heterophylla Willd. spe- cies complexes. We compared how these lineages differ in the suite of chemical, biotic, phenological and developmental defences as compared to non-defensive traits that are related to habitat use and resource acquisition. We also collected insect herbivores feeding on the plants. 3. Our data show that sister lineages within both species complexes are more divergent in antiherbi- vore defences than in other non-defensive, functional traits. Moreover, the assemblages of herbivore communities are dissimilar between the populations of coexisting I. capitata lineages. 4. Synthesis. Our results are consistent with the idea that for the I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Causes of Convergent Evolution
    Nature Reviews Genetics | AOP, published online 9 October 2013; doi:10.1038/nrg3483 REVIEWS The genetic causes of convergent evolution David L. Stern Abstract | The evolution of phenotypic similarities between species, known as convergence, illustrates that populations can respond predictably to ecological challenges. Convergence often results from similar genetic changes, which can emerge in two ways: the evolution of similar or identical mutations in independent lineages, which is termed parallel evolution; and the evolution in independent lineages of alleles that are shared among populations, which I call collateral genetic evolution. Evidence for parallel and collateral evolution has been found in many taxa, and an emerging hypothesis is that they result from the fact that mutations in some genetic targets minimize pleiotropic effects while simultaneously maximizing adaptation. If this proves correct, then the molecular changes underlying adaptation might be more predictable than has been appreciated previously. (FIG. 1) Fitness Different species often evolve similar solutions to envi­ introgression . It is worth distinguishing between The potential evolutionary ronmental challenges. Insects, birds and bats evo­ these scenarios because each provides evidence for a dif­ success of a genotype, defined lved wings, and octopi, vertebrates and spiders ferent evolutionary path3. The first case, the independent as the reproductive success or evolved focusing eyes. Phenotypic convergence provides origin and spread of mutations, has been called parallel the proportion of genes that an individual leaves in the gene compelling evidence that ecological circumstances can genetic evolution. I suggest that the evolution of alleles 1,2 pool of the next generation in a select for similar evolutionary solutions .
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Mammalian Aging
    Experimental Gerontology 37 &2002) 769±775 www.elsevier.com/locate/expgero The evolution of mammalian aging JoaÄo Pedro de MagalhaÄes*, Olivier Toussaint Department of Biology, Unit of Cellular Biochemistry and Biology, University of Namur FUNDP), Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium Received 18 December 2001; received in revised form 15 January 2002; accepted 18 January 2002 Abstract The incidence of aging is different between mammals and their closer ancestors &e.g. reptiles and amphibians). While all studied mammals express a well-de®ned aging phenotype, many amphibians and reptiles fail to show signs of aging. In addition, mammalian species show great similarities in their aging phenotype, suggesting that a common origin might be at work. The proposed hypothesis is that mammalian aging evolved together with the ancestry of modern mammals. In turn, this suggests that the fundamental cause of human aging is common to most, if not all, mammals and might be a unique phenom- enon. Experimental procedures capable of testing these theories and how to map the causes of mammalian and thus, human aging, are predicted. q 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Aging; Senescence; Evolution; Mammals; Reptiles; Birds; Longevity 1. Introduction life span to Marion's tortoise capable of living over a century in captivity. Studies conducted in frogs failed Aging affects all studied mammalian species: from to indicate any increase in mortality both in the wild mice living no more than a mere half-a-dozen years to &Plytycz et al., 1995) and in captivity &Brocas and humans capable of living over 120years &Comfort, VerzaÁr, 1961).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Natural Selection?
    This week (June 8th – 12th) we are reviewing evolution. 1. Review the lecture on evolution 2. Watch the evidence of evolution video: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-evolution/hs- evidence-of-evolution/v/evidence-for-evolution 3. Watch the Types of Natural Selection video https://youtu.be/64JUJdZdDQo 4. Complete the Evolution Review Activity 5. Complete the Natural Selection Reading and Questions I am grading you based on the rubric below. If you get below a 70% I will allow you to redo the assignment. Evidence of Evolution & the Week 5 Remote Learning Mechanisms of Biodiversity Natural Selection The total variety of all the organisms in the biosphere= Biodiversity Where did all these different organisms come from? How are they related? Some organisms in a population are less likely to survive. Over time, natural selection results in changes in the inherited characteristics of a population. WHAT IS DARWIN’S THEORY? These changes increase a species’ fitness in its environment. Any inherited characteristic Ability of an individual to that increases an organism’s survive and reproduce in its chance of survival= specific environment= FITNESS ADAPTATION WHAT IS DARWIN’S THEORY? STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE: means that members of each species must compete for food, space, and other resources. SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST: organisms which are better adapted to the environment will survive and reproduce, passing on their genes. DESCENT WITH MODIFICATION: suggests that each species has decended, with changes, from other species over time. • This idea suggests that all living species are related to each other, and that all species, living and extinct,share a common ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Ant-Mimicking Beetles Edcator Materials
    Evolution of Ant-Mimicking Beetles Data Point Educator Materials HOW TO USE THIS RESOURCE Show the following figures and caption to your students. The accompanying Student Handout provides space below the caption for Observations, Notes, and Questions and space next to the “Background Information” for Big Ideas, Notes, and Questions. The “Interpreting the Figures” and “Discussion Questions” sections provide additional information and suggested questions that you can use to prompt student thinking, increase engagement, or guide a class discussion about the characteristics of the figures and what they show. Figure 1: Figure 2: Caption: Figure 1 shows one species of ant-mimicking rove beetle (front) next to the ant species (back) that it mimics. The top half of Figure 2 shows more species of rove beetles from the same subfamily, Aleocharinae. “Free- living” beetles (example shown on the left) have a generalized beetle body type. “Army ant social parasite” beetles (examples shown on the right) have a specialized ant-mimicking (also called “myrmecoid”) body type. The bottom half of Figure 2 shows the evolutionary relationships among multiple Aleocharinae lineages that are either generalized (black) or ant-mimicking (orange). The labeled circle indicates the most recent common ancestor of all the ant-mimicking lineages. Phylogeny Published November 2019 www.BioInteractive.org Page 1 of 3 Data Point Evolution of Ant-Mimicking Beetles Educator Materials BACKGROUND INFORMATION Rove beetles are a large family of beetle species found all over the world. Although most rove beetles live freely on their own, many species in the subfamily Aleocharinae live closely with another type of insect: army ants.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Origins for Ecological Patterns in Space PERSPECTIVE Mark C
    PERSPECTIVE Evolutionary origins for ecological patterns in space PERSPECTIVE Mark C. Urbana,b,1, Sharon Y. Straussc, Fanie Pelletierd, Eric P. Palkovacse, Mathew A. Leiboldf, Andrew P. Hendryg,h, Luc De Meesteri,j,k, Stephanie M. Carlsonl, Amy L. Angertm, and Sean T. Gierya,n Edited by Simon A. Levin, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved June 5, 2020 (received for review January 24, 2020) Historically, many biologists assumed that evolution and ecology acted independently because evolution occurred over distances too great to influence most ecological patterns. Today, evidence indicates that evolution can operate over a range of spatial scales, including fine spatial scales. Thus, evolutionary divergence across space might frequently interact with the mechanisms that also determine spatial ecological patterns. Here, we synthesize insights from 500 eco-evolutionary studies and develop a predictive framework that seeks to understand whether and when evolution amplifies, dampens, or creates ecological patterns. We demonstrate that local adaptation can alter everything from spatial variation in population abundances to ecosystem properties. We uncover 14 mechanisms that can mediate the outcome of evolution on spatial ecological patterns. Sometimes, evolution amplifies environmental variation, especially when selection enhances resource uptake or patch selection. The local evolution of foundation or keystone species can create ecological patterns where none existed originally. However, most often, we find that evolution dampens existing environmental gradients, because local adaptation evens out fitness across environments and thus counteracts the variation in associated ecological patterns. Consequently, evolution generally smooths out the underlying heterogeneity in nature, making the world appear less ragged than it would be in the absence of evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • TYPES of EVOLUTION WORKSHEET Directions: Read Each Description Below and Write the Mane of the Type of Evolution That Is Being Described
    Convergent: Ecological pressures cause a similarity in structure or function, but not from a common ancestor. Divergent: Evolution arising out of differences in organism which had a common ancestor. Coevolution: Evolution in which one organism causes another to change since they live in close association.. Pnctuated equilibrium: Evolution is stable for a time and suddenly jumps to new forms TYPES OF EVOLUTION WORKSHEET Directions: Read each description below and write the mane of the type of evolution that is being described. Write the word in the appropriate box. WORD BANK convergent evolution divergent evolution coevolution punctuated equilibrium Description evolution evolution Divergent Punctuated Convergent equilibrium Coevolution In the ocean surrounding Antarctica, there are fish that survive the cold water by using a molecule made of glycoproteins that circulates the blood and keeps it from 1 freezing. Certain kinds of worms that live in the Arctic ocean also make antifreeze proteins that help them live in icy water. Ants are the correct size and weight needed to open the 2 flowers for the peony plant. The peony plant provides food for the ant and the ant fertilizes the peony’s flowers Horse evolution shows long stable periods of little evolution 3 interrupted by brief periods of rapid change. A kit fox lives in the desert and has large ears with greater surface area that keep the fox from getting overheated. The 4 red fox lives in the forest and has a red coat that keeps it camouflaged. Hummingbirds have a beak just the right length to reach the nectar in a cardinal flower and as they feed their foreheads bump into the pollen structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Mimicry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lake Forest College Publications Eukaryon Volume 4 Article 24 3-16-2008 The volutE ion of Mimicry Ethan Helm Lake Forest College Follow this and additional works at: http://publications.lakeforest.edu/eukaryon Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Biodiversity Commons, and the Evolution Commons Disclaimer: Eukaryon is published by students at Lake Forest College, who are solely responsible for its content. The views expressed in Eukaryon do not necessarily reflect those of the College. Articles published within Eukaryon should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author. This Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications at Lake Forest College Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eukaryon by an authorized editor of Lake Forest College Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eukaryon, Vol. 4, March 2008, Lake Forest College ____________________________Review Article The Evolution of Mimicry Ethan Helm* deduced. This review is a comprehensive analysis of Department of Biology primary literature focusing on addressing these Lake Forest College evolutionary issues, while also evaluating the two-step Lake Forest, Illinois 60045 hypothesis and the gradual hypothesis of Müllerian mimicry. Introduction Mathematical Modeling of Mimicry Cryptic species have evolved camouflage, which enhances survival by decreasing their visibility and thus Mathematical and computerized modeling systems are protecting them from would-be predators. Conversely, commonly used to mimic the evolution of mimicry.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution Lesson 8.4: Macroevolution and the Origin of Species Lesson
    Chapter 8: Evolution Lesson 8.4: Macroevolution and the Origin of Species Fast or slow? Which is better, the direct route or the scenic route? Each has its advantages, depending on the situation. And that describes evolution. It can be fast or slow, depending on the situation. Lesson Objectives • Describe two ways that new species may originate. • Differentiate between allopatric, peripatric, parapatric, and sympatric speciation. • Identify the different patterns of macroevolution • Distinguish between gradualism and punctuated equilibrium. • Understand the concept of extinction and how it affects evolution. Vocabulary • allopatric speciation • behavioral isolation • coevolution • convergent evolution • divergent evolution • geographic isolation • gradualism • parapatric speciation • peripatric speciation • punctuated equilibrium • speciation • sympatric speciation • temporal isolation Introduction Macroevolution is evolution over geologic time above the level of the species. One of the main topics in macroevolution is how new species arise. The process by which a new species evolves is called speciation. How does speciation occur? How does one species evolve into two or more new species? 275 Origin of Species To understand how a new species forms, it’s important to review what a species is. A species is a group of organisms that can breed and produce fertile offspring together in nature. For a new species to arise, some members of a species must become reproductively isolated from the rest of the species. This means they can no longer interbreed with other members of the species. How does this happen? Usually they become geographically isolated first. The macroevolution of a species happens as a result of speciation. Speciation is the branching off of individuals from the species they originally were.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns, Mechanisms and Genetics of Speciation in Reptiles and Amphibians
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Patterns, Mechanisms and Genetics of Speciation in Reptiles and Amphibians Katharina C. Wollenberg Valero 1,* , Jonathon C. Marshall 2, Elizabeth Bastiaans 3, Adalgisa Caccone 4, Arley Camargo 5 , Mariana Morando 6, Matthew L. Niemiller 7, Maciej Pabijan 8 , Michael A. Russello 9, Barry Sinervo 10, Fernanda P. Werneck 11 , 12, 13 14 Jack W. Sites Jr. y, John J. Wiens and Sebastian Steinfartz 1 Department of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK 2 Department of Zoology, Weber State University, 1415 Edvalson Street, Dept. 2505, Ogden, UT 84401, USA 3 Department of Biology, State University of New York, College at Oneonta, Oneonta, NY 13820, USA 4 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 5 Centro Universitario de Rivera, Universidad de la República, Ituzaingó 667, Rivera 40000, Uruguay 6 Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales (IPEEC, CENPAT-CONICET) Bv. Brown 2915, Puerto Madryn U9120ACD, Argentina 7 Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA 8 Department of Comparative Anatomy, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, ul. Gronostajowa 9, 30-387 Kraków, Poland 9 Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3247 University Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada 10 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Coastal Biology Building,
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent Evolution and Evolution by the Birth-And-Death Process in the Immunoglobulin VH Gene Family
    Divergent Evolution and Evolution by the Birth-and-Death Process in the Immunoglobulin VH Gene Family Tatsuya Ota and Masatoshi Nei Department of Biology and Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, The Pennsylvania State University Immunoglobulin diversity is generated primarily by the heavy- and light-chain variable-region gene families. To understand the pattern of long-term evolution of the heavy-chain variable-region (V,) gene family, which is composed of a large number of member genes, the evolutionary relationships of representative Vn genes from diverse organisms of vertebrates were studied by constructing a phylogenetic tree. This tree indicates that the vertebrate Vn genes can be classified into group A, B, C, D, and E genes. All Vn genes from cartilaginous fishes such as sharks and skates form a monophyletic group and belong to group E, whereas group D consists of bony- fish Vn genes. By contrast, group C includes not only some fish genes but also amphibian, reptile, bird, and mammalian genes. Group A and B genes were composed of the genes from mammals and amphibians. The phylogenetic analysis also suggests that mammalian Vu genes are classified into three clusters-i.e., mammalian clans I, II, and III-and that these clans have coexisted in the genome for >400 Myr. To study the short-term evolution of Vn genes, the phylogenetic analysis of human group A (clan I) and C (clan III) genes was also conducted. The results obtained show that Vn pseudogenes have evolved much faster than functional genes and that they have branched off from various functional Vu genes.
    [Show full text]