CANINE ARTHROPODS: CLASS INSECTA Recommendations from the Companion Animal Parasite Council I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CANINE ARTHROPODS: CLASS INSECTA Recommendations from the Companion Animal Parasite Council I PEER REVIEWED PARASITE PROTOCOLS Parasite Protocols For YOUR Practice CANINE ARTHROPODS: CLASS INSECTA Recommendations from the Companion Animal Parasite Council I. Craig Prior, BVSc, CVJ Murphy Road Animal Hospital Nashville, Tennessee R. William Stich, MS, PhD University of Missouri TABLE 1. Hematophagous Insects That Parasitize Dogs The mission of the Companion Animal Parasite Council POTENTIAL (CAPC) is to foster animal and DIRECT TYPE OF INSECTA PATHOGENS EFFECT ON METAMOR- human health, while preserving CLASS VECTORED TO PETS PHOSIS the human–animal bond, PETS through recommendations Flies Arboviruses Fly strike/worry Complete for the diagnosis, treatment, (order Diptera) Dirofilaria immitis Irritation prevention, and control of Leishmania species Myiasis parasitic infections. For Fleas Bartonella species Anemia Complete more information, including (order Dipetalonema Flea allergy detailed parasite control Siphonaptera) Dipylidium caninum dermatitis Mycoplasma Pruritus recommendations, please visit species capcvet.org. Rickettsia felis and typhi Yersinia pestis ith approximately Sucking lice Bartonella species Anemia Simple 1 million species, (order Anoplura) Rickettsia Depression arthropods compose prowazekii Wthe largest of all Chewing lice Dipylidium caninum Pruritus Simple animal phyla. There are at least (order 6 arthropod classes of medical Mallophaga) importance; this article dis- True bugs Trypanosoma cruzi Papules Simple cusses those in the Insecta class (order that affect dogs in the United Hemiptera) States (Table 1). tvpjournal.com November/December 2014 Today’s Veterinary Practice 51 | PARASITE PROTOCOLS TABLE 2. Characteristics of Insects Wings* 3 leg pairs 3 body segments (head, thorax, abdomen) 1 pair of antennae * In some parasitic insects, wings are reduced to vestigial pads. 1 2 ARTHROPOD CHARACTERISTICS Figure 1. Cyclorrhaphan maggots are usually found in Characteristics that distinguish arthropods from other organic matter, whether decaying (filth flies) or living invertebrates include a hard exoskeleton and pairs of (myiasis-producing flies). Figure 2. Brachyceran larvae are often found along jointed appendages. Different arthropod taxa undergo waterways lined with vegetation and mud. different degrees of metamorphosis as they develop from immature to adult stages, which can be key to ef- fective control of arthropod ectoparasites. INSECT CHARACTERISTICS Several characteristics distinguish insects from other arthropods (Table 2). All members of an insect order share a common mat- uration process, or metamorphosis. Although entomol- ogists recognize several forms of metamorphosis, when it comes to insect control, only simple versus complex (or complete) metamorphosis is considered. • Simple metamorphosis—in which immature stag- es are similar to the adult stage—are usually ame- nable to similar control measures at all life stages • Complete metamorphosis—in which immature and adult stages are very different in appearance and, usually, habitat and food source—often require different measures for comprehensive control of dif- ferent life stages. Figure 3. Among the Nematocera, immature blackflies TRUE FLIES (ORDER DIPTERA) (B) are found in rapidly running water; immature Diptera (di meaning two, and ptera meaning wings) mosquitos (M) are found in still waters associated with usually have a single pair of wings (some, such as flooded areas, permanent pools of water, or temporarily sheep keds, are wingless). True flies can be difficult filled containers; and immature sandflies (S) are found in to control, partially because of complete metamor- crevices or burrows that offer a dark microenvironment phosis that necessitates integrated control measures.1 with high relative humidity and moderate temperature. The 3 large dipteran groups, distinguished by anten- na morphology, are also distinguishable according to control measures: Figure 4. A rodent 1. Cyclorrhaphans (filth flies, several biting flies, and bot (Cuterebra spe- myiasis-producing flies) (Figure 1) cies) in the neck of a cat. Female Cu- 2. Brachycerans (horse flies and deer flies) (Figure 2) terebra flies deposit 3. Nematocerans (mosquitoes, black flies, sandflies, eggs around burrows and midges) (Figure 3). of their natural hosts (rodents), but the larvae also invade Cyclorrhaphans predators that visit Cyclorrhaphans, including houseflies (Musca domesti- these burrows. ca), that affect domestic animals are often called “filth flies” because larval and pupal stages are associated 52 Today’s Veterinary Practice November/December 2014 tvpjournal.com PARASITE PROTOCOLS | with decaying organic material. Some filth flies, such as stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans), are he- matophagous as adults. Flesh flies and bottle flies can be associated with facultative myiasis that is often secondary to poor host condition. Some muscoid flies undergo obli- gate myiasis, which requires a living host for their larval stages. Among these, rodent bots (Cuterebra species) are myiasis-producing flies found in U.S. companion animals (Figure 4). Brachycerans Adult horse flies and deer flies are voracious blood CANINE ARTHROPODS: CLASS INSECTA feeders that can serve as mechanical vectors of blood-borne pathogens, such as Francisella tula- rensis. Brachycera breed near slow-moving water with muddy banks and vegetation. Nematocerans Hematophagous female mosquitoes, sandflies, midges, and black flies are important pests them- selves; however, they are even more problematic as vectors of pathogens and parasites, including: • Filarial nematodes, such as Dirofilaria (mosqui- toes) Figure 5. Laterally flattened Ctenocephalides felis fleas • Protozoa, such as Leishmania (sandflies) feed and lay eggs that fall off the host, allowing the • Bacteria, such as Bartonella (sandflies) caterpillar-like larvae and pupae to develop in host • Arboviruses, such as West Nile virus (mosqui- bedding and other parts of the environment. Flea feces toes). (“flea dirt”) are shown on the pale skin and fur of a Larval and pupal stages require standing water heavily infested dog. (mosquitoes), rapidly moving water (black flies), or a microenvironment with high humidity (sand- Classification flies). Fleas are often ecologically adapted to their hosts, which means they may opportunistically infest aberrant hosts Control Strategies that venture into the habitats of their natural hosts. Sev- Immature and adult fly stages often require differ- eral flea species parasitize various mammalian and avian ent control strategies.1 hosts; those associated with dogs include: • Adults can be mechanically controlled with 1. Echidnophaga gallinacea (sticktight flea) traps, screens, and fans, and chemically con- 2. Tunga penetrans (chigoe or jigger), which embeds in trolled with sprays for knockdown and repel- the skin (usually on or near the bottom of the foot) lants to protect hosts. 3. Pulex irritans (human flea) • Larvae and pupae are controlled through their 4. Pulex simulans, which infests rodents, cats, coyotes, environments, such as sanitation to remove de- dogs, foxes, opossums, raccoons, and other animals caying organic material (filth flies) and standing water in containers (mosquitoes). Some flea and 5. Ctenocephalides canis (dog flea), which is rare tick preventive agents containing neonicotinoid 6. Ctenocephalides felis (cat flea). which is the most com- class pesticides are also labeled for controlling mon ectoparasite of dogs and cats in North America. 2 biting flies, mosquitoes, and sandflies. Cat fleas, however, are uncommon in areas where rela- tive humidity remains below 50% (eg, desert South- FLEAS (ORDER SIPHONAPTERA) west and Rocky Mountains). Fleas are small (≤ 1/8 inch), wingless, laterally flat- tened insects that are exceptional jumpers. In Diagnosis dogs, pruritus from adult fleas is common and ex- Adult fleas and flea dirt (ie, flea feces) can be removed acerbated by flea allergy dermatitis. In addition, from the host with a flea comb; flea dirt (Figure 5) is heavy infestations can cause anemia. Certain flea identified when placed on a moist paper towel, which species have also been incriminated as pathogen allows the blood-laden feces to dissolve into visible red 3,4 vectors. spots. tvpjournal.com November/December 2014 Today’s Veterinary Practice 53 | PARASITE PROTOCOLS Flea larvae may occasionally be found on bedding. These tiny, caterpillar-like larvae have poorly developed heads, 13 segments, and sparse setae (insect “hairs”). Control Strategies Fleas undergo complete metamorphosis, making their control particularly challenging,5 and most fleas in an in- fested environment are eggs, larvae, and pupae. Effective comprehensive flea control requires:4 A • Removal of adult fleas on pets • Elimination of environmental stages • Prevention of subsequent reinfestations. Preventives. Prevention and elimination efforts have changed dramatically over recent decades due to avail- ability of monthly flea preventives.6 Notably, in addition B to killing adult fleas, some preventive agents also contain insect growth or development inhibitors that can control immature flea stages. Because infested wildlife or stray companion animals can introduce fleas, the most effective control regimens C involve flea preventives from soon after birth (see label claims) throughout the pet’s life. However, there are sub- stantial geographic differences in distribution and sea- Figure 6. The dorsoventrally flattened sonality of cat fleas and other flea species; therefore, tai- chewing (Trichodectes canis, A)
Recommended publications
  • Resource Predictability and Host Specificity in Fleas
    81 Resource predictability and host specificity in fleas: the effect of host body mass B. R. KRASNOV1*, S. MORAND2,D.MOUILLOT3,G.I.SHENBROT1, I. S. KHOKHLOVA4 and R. POULIN5 1 Ramon Science Center and Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 194, Mizpe Ramon 80600, Israel 2 Center for Biology and Management of Populations, Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France 3 UMR CNRS-UMII 5119 Ecosystemes Lagunaires, University of Montpellier II, CC093, FR-34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France 4 Desert Animals Adaptations and Husbandry, Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel 5 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand (Received 22 November 2005; revised 28 December 2005; accepted 24 January 2006; first published online 28 March 2006) SUMMARY Ecological specialization is hypothesized to result from the exploitation of predictable resource bases. For parasitic organisms, one prediction is that parasites of large-bodied host species, which tend to be long-lived, should specialize on these hosts, whereas parasites of small host species, which represent more ephemeral and less predictable resources, should become generalists. We tested this prediction by quantifying the association between the level of host specificity of fleas and the mean body mass of their mammalian hosts, using published data from 2 large, distinct geographical regions (South Africa and northern North America). In general, we found supporting evidence that flea host specificity, measured either as the number of host species exploited or their taxonomic distinctness, became more pronounced with increasing host body mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Entomological Society
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL , SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. I. Part 1 (). HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS SIPHONAPTERA 13y F. G. A. M. SMIT LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms - 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 21st June, I9S7 Price £1 os. od. ACCESSION NUMBER ....... ................... British Entomological & Natural History Society c/o Dinton Pastures Country Park, Davis Street, Hurst, OTS - Reading, Berkshire RG 10 OTH .•' Presented by Date Librarian R EGULATIONS I.- No member shall be allowed to borrow more than five volumes at a time, or to keep any of tbem longer than three months. 2.-A member shall at any time on demand by the Librarian forthwith return any volumes in his possession. 3.-Members damaging, losing, or destroying any book belonging to the Society shall either provide a new copy or pay such sum as tbe Council shall tbink fit. ) "1' > ) I .. ··•• · ·• "V>--· .•. .t ... -;; ·· · ·- ~~- -~· · · ····· · · { · · · l!i JYt.11'ian, ,( i-es; and - REGU--LATIONS dthougll 1.- Books may b - ~dapted, ; ~ 2 -~ . e borrowed at . !.l :: - --- " . ~ o Member shall b . all Meeflfll(s of the So J t Volumes at a time o; ,IJJowed to borrow more c e y . 3.- An y Mem ber r t '. to keep them lonl{er th than three b.ecorn_e SPecified f e a Jn!ng a \'oJume a n one m on th.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Methods to Control an Infestation by the Dog Louse (Trichodectes Canis) in Gray Wolves (Canis Lupus)
    ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FEDERAL AID FINAL DIVISION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PO Box 115526 RESEARCH PERFORMANCE REPORT Juneau, AK 99811-5526 PROJECT TITLE: Evaluating methods to control an infestation by the dog louse (Trichodectes canis) in gray wolves (Canis lupus) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Craig L. Gardner, ADF&G; ADF&G coauthors: Kimberlee B. Beckmen, Nathan J. Pamperin, and Patricia Del Vecchio COOPERATORS: None FEDERAL AID GRANT PROGRAM: Wildlife Restoration GRANT AND SEGMENT NO.: W-33-5 through W-33-12 PROJECT NO.: 14.25 WORK LOCATION: Game Management Units 20A and 20C, Tanana Flats STATE: Alaska PERIOD: 1 July 2006–30 June 2014 I. PROBLEM OR NEED THAT PROMPTED THIS RESEARCH Ectoparasites can cause pathogenic effects on wild hosts (Wall 2007). Most commonly their direct feeding can cause skin damage and these wounds are vulnerable to infection. Some ectoparasites can act as vectors for other parasites and disease and indirectly harm the host by causing increased rubbing or scratching behavior resulting in reduced time feeding and possible self wounding (Wall 2007). Expanding human influences in wilderness areas has opened pathways for non-native parasites to be introduced (Sleeman and Gillin 2012). Development of effective monitoring techniques to assess impacts and management treatments to reduce detrimental impacts has become important in disease and parasite management across the world (May 1988, Gortazar et al. 2007), but treatment of wide-ranging wild hosts remains difficult (Sovell and Holmes 1996). The biting dog louse (Trichodectes canis) is an obligate ectoparasite of canids (Tompkins and Clayton 1999, Durden 2001) and was first detected in Alaska (USA) on wolves (Canis lupus) on the Kenai Peninsula in 1981 (Schwartz et.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 20” Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 March 25, 2015 Kevin R. Becker Department of the Air Force Detachment 1, 23rd Wing Avon Park Air/Ground Training Complex (ACC) Avon Park Air Force Range, Florida 33825 Service CPA Code: 2013-CPA-0255 Service Consultation Code: 2013-F-0271 Date Received: September 3, 2013 Project: Avon Park AFR, JIFE Counties: Highlands and Polk Dear Lieutenant Colonel Beeker: This document transmits the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion based on our review of the U.S. Air Force’s (USAF) proposed Joint Integrated Fires Exercises (JIFE) at Avon Park Air Force Range (APAFR) in Highlands and Polk Counties, Florida, and its adverse effects on the threatened eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corals couperi) (indigo snake), threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) (scrub-jay), endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCW), and endangered Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) (FBB) in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.). This Biological Opinion is based on information provided in the USAF’s August 28, 2013, biological assessment (BA), conversations, and other sources of information. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file in the South Florida Ecological Services Office, Vero Beach, Florida. Consultation History On May 2, 2013, the USAF requested the assistance of the Service with the review of their draft BA for the JIFE. On May 8, 2013, the Service sent the USAF an email with comments on the draft BA.
    [Show full text]
  • Bot Fly (Cuterebrid) Prevalence and Intensity in Southern Illinois Peromyscus Species and a Comparison to the Literature
    Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science received 7/30/14 (2015) Volume 108, pp. 1-3 accepted 1/26/15 Bot Fly (Cuterebrid) Prevalence and Intensity in Southern Illinois Peromyscus Species and a Comparison to the Literature Stephanie J Hayes, Eric J Holzmueller1, and Clayton K Nielsen Department of Forestry, Southern Illinois University, 1205 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901 1corresponding author (email: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Cuterebrid are parasitic organisms on small mammals in North America. While infections are believed to be common, little has been published regarding the population dynamics of these insects. This study was conducted on the impact of a cuterbrid species on Peromy- scus spp. in upland hardwood forests in southern Illinois. Data were recorded and compiled to determine the species of cuterebrid pres- ent, the prevalence and intensity of infection, and possible causes for such a high infection rate. Infected individuals were trapped during late summer for three weeks. The species of cuterebrid was determined to be Cuterebra fontinella due to the seasonality of infection (late summer), location of infection (inguinal or genital region) within the host, and the species of host (Peromyscus spp.). Intensity was within the range of historical averages; however, prevalence was greater in this study than in previous similar studies. Though the exact cause is unknown, it is possible that an abnormally wet summer caused an increase in egg survivability before the peak infection season, leading to an increase in infection rates later in the year. Key words: central hardwood region, Cuterebra fontinella, Peromyscus, parasitic organism INTRODUCTION of Nature Environmental Center (UTM: for the presence of cuterebrid larvae and Bot flies are a group of parasitic insects 16S 308552, 4167338) in Jackson County the intensity of infection within the host.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What Can We Predict About the Spread of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases?
    2010 Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What can we predict about the spread of vector-borne zoonotic diseases? Ph.D. Dissertation Megan M. Friggens School of Forestry I I I \, l " FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? by Megan M. Friggens A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science Northern Arizona University May 2010 ?Jii@~-~-u-_- Robert R. Parmenter, Ph. D. ~",l(*~ l.~ Paulette L. Ford, Ph. D. --=z:r-J'l1jU~ David M. Wagner, Ph. D. ABSTRACT FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? MEGAN M. FRIGGENS Vector-borne diseases of humans and wildlife are experiencing resurgence across the globe. I examine the dynamics of flea borne diseases through a comparative analysis of flea literature and analyses of field data collected from three sites in New Mexico: The Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, the Sandia Mountains and the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP). My objectives were to use these analyses to better predict and manage for the spread of diseases such as plague (Yersinia pestis). To assess the impact of anthropogenic disturbance on flea communities, I compiled and analyzed data from 63 published empirical studies. Anthropogenic disturbance is associated with conditions conducive to increased transmission of flea-borne diseases. Most measures of flea infestation increased with increasing disturbance or peaked at intermediate levels of disturbance. Future trends of habitat and climate change will probably favor the spread of flea-borne disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Bot Fly Cuterebra Emasculator (Diptera: Cuterebridae) in South Carolina1
    Distribution of the Bot Fly Cuterebra emasculator (Diptera: Cuterebridae) in South Carolina1 Frank Slansky and Bill Hilton Jr.2 Department of Entomology & Nematology, Bldg. 970 Natural Area Drive, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 20(2): 83–91 (April 2003) ABSTRACT Larvae of the bot fly Cuterebra emasculator Fitch infest tree squirrels and chipmunks from the Atlantic Ocean to just west of the Missis- sippi River and from southern Canada to the Gulf Coast of the United States. Whether the species is present in all states and provinces in this region is not well documented. Because there are few published records of C. emasculator in South Carolina, we gathered data on its occurrence in each county by obtaining reports of bot fly-infested squirrels from wildlife rehabilitators, veterinarians, wildlife biologists, county extension agents, hunters, and other wildlife- oriented people. The results indicate that C. emasculator infests squirrels, especially the eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin), throughout the state. In South Carolina there apparently are no bot fly-free refugia (at the scale of counties) where squirrels might escape from Cuterebra parasites. KEY WORDS bot fly, Cuterebra emasculator, Cuterebridae, Diptera, dis- tribution, parasite/host association, rodent, Sciurus, squirrel There is strong ecological interest in determining whether populations of po- tential host species avoid parasites by colonizing areas lacking these natural enemies (Grenfell & Gulland 1995, Clayton & Moore 1997, Hassell 2000, Poulin et al. 2000). Such “allopatric escape” might occur especially when the interacting organisms show considerable taxonomic divergence, such as mammalian hosts and their arthropod parasites, particularly those that live independent of a host during part of their life cycle (Arlian & Vyszenski-Moher 1987, Marshall 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas and Flea-Borne Diseases
    International Journal of Infectious Diseases 14 (2010) e667–e676 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Infectious Diseases journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijid Review Fleas and flea-borne diseases Idir Bitam a, Katharina Dittmar b, Philippe Parola a, Michael F. Whiting c, Didier Raoult a,* a Unite´ de Recherche en Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales Emergentes, CNRS-IRD UMR 6236, Faculte´ de Me´decine, Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´e, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France b Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA c Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA ARTICLE INFO SUMMARY Article history: Flea-borne infections are emerging or re-emerging throughout the world, and their incidence is on the Received 3 February 2009 rise. Furthermore, their distribution and that of their vectors is shifting and expanding. This publication Received in revised form 2 June 2009 reviews general flea biology and the distribution of the flea-borne diseases of public health importance Accepted 4 November 2009 throughout the world, their principal flea vectors, and the extent of their public health burden. Such an Corresponding Editor: William Cameron, overall review is necessary to understand the importance of this group of infections and the resources Ottawa, Canada that must be allocated to their control by public health authorities to ensure their timely diagnosis and treatment. Keywords: ß 2010 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Flea Siphonaptera Plague Yersinia pestis Rickettsia Bartonella Introduction to 16 families and 238 genera have been described, but only a minority is synanthropic, that is they live in close association with The past decades have seen a dramatic change in the geographic humans (Table 1).4,5 and host ranges of many vector-borne pathogens, and their diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Parasites in Domestic Animals
    ARTHROPOD PARASITES IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS Abbreviations KINGDOM PHYLUM CLASS ORDER CODE Metazoa Arthropoda Insecta Siphonaptera INS:Sip Mallophaga INS:Mal Anoplura INS:Ano Diptera INS:Dip Arachnida Ixodida ARA:Ixo Mesostigmata ARA:Mes Prostigmata ARA:Pro Astigmata ARA:Ast Crustacea Pentastomata CRU:Pen References Ashford, R.W. & Crewe, W. 2003. The parasites of Homo sapiens: an annotated checklist of the protozoa, helminths and arthropods for which we are home. Taylor & Francis. Taylor, M.A., Coop, R.L. & Wall, R.L. 2007. Veterinary Parasitology. 3rd edition, Blackwell Pub. HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST Class: MAMMALIA [mammals] Subclass: EUTHERIA [placental mammals] Order: PRIMATES [prosimians and simians] Suborder: SIMIAE [monkeys, apes, man] Family: HOMINIDAE [man] Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758 [man] ARA:Ast Sarcoptes bovis, ectoparasite (‘milker’s itch’)(mange mite) ARA:Ast Sarcoptes equi, ectoparasite (‘cavalryman’s itch’)(mange mite) ARA:Ast Sarcoptes scabiei, skin (mange mite) ARA:Ixo Ixodes cornuatus, ectoparasite (scrub tick) ARA:Ixo Ixodes holocyclus, ectoparasite (scrub tick, paralysis tick) ARA:Ixo Ornithodoros gurneyi, ectoparasite (kangaroo tick) ARA:Pro Cheyletiella blakei, ectoparasite (mite) ARA:Pro Cheyletiella parasitivorax, ectoparasite (rabbit fur mite) ARA:Pro Demodex brevis, sebacceous glands (mange mite) ARA:Pro Demodex folliculorum, hair follicles (mange mite) ARA:Pro Trombicula sarcina, ectoparasite (black soil itch mite) INS:Ano Pediculus capitis, ectoparasite (head louse) INS:Ano Pediculus humanus, ectoparasite (body
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Characterization of JEZS 2016; 4(4): 713-717 © 2016 JEZS Ctenocephalides Spp Isolated from Dogs in North of Received: 06-05-2016
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(4): 713-717 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Morphological and molecular characterization of JEZS 2016; 4(4): 713-717 © 2016 JEZS Ctenocephalides spp isolated from dogs in north of Received: 06-05-2016 Accepted: 07-06-2016 Iran Amrollah Azarm Department of Medical Amrollah Azarm, Abdolhossin Dalimi, Mahdi Mohebali, Anita Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammadiha and Zabihollah Zarei Tarbit Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Abstract The main aim of the present study was to assess the infestation level of Ctenocephalides spp on domestic Abdolhossin Dalimi dogs in Meshkinshahr County, located in Ardabil province (north of Iran). A total of 20 domestic dogs Department of Medical were randomly selected for this study. After flea combing, results revealed that 100% of the dogs were Parasitology and Entomology, infested with fleas. A total number of 942 fleas were collected. Two species were identified, of which Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbit Modares University, Ctenocephalides canis the most abundant (98.73%) was followed by C. felis (1.27%). The dog flea, C. Tehran, Iran. canis was the most common flea infesting 100% dogs and C. felis was identified on 7/20 (35%).The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences of C. canis and C. felis collected from dogs to clarify the Mahdi Mohebali taxonomic status of these species. The results of PCR assay and sequence analysis did not show clear Department of Medical molecular differences between C. canis and C. felis. Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran Keywords: Flea, Ctenocephalides canis, C.
    [Show full text]