In the Las Merindades Area (Burgos, Spain) Domínguez-Peñafiel G.*, Giménez-Pardo C.**, Gegúndez M.I.** & Lledó L.**

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In the Las Merindades Area (Burgos, Spain) Domínguez-Peñafiel G.*, Giménez-Pardo C.**, Gegúndez M.I.** & Lledó L.** Article available at http://www.parasite-journal.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2011183251 PREVALENCE OF ECTOPARASITIC ARTHROPODS ON WILD ANIMALS AND CATTLE IN THE LAS MERINDADES AREA (BURGOS, SPAIN) DOMÍNGUEZ-PEÑAFIEL G.*, GIMÉNEZ-PARDO C.**, GEGÚNDEZ M.I.** & LLEDÓ L.** Summary: Résumé : PRÉVALENCE DES ARTHROPODES ECTOPARASITES SUR LES ANIMAUX SAUVAGES ET LE BÉTAIL DANS LA RÉGION DE LAS MERINDADES This paper reports the prevalence of ectoparasitic arthropods in (BURGOS, ESPAGNE) sampled groups of wild (n = 128; 16 species) and domestic (n = 69; 3 species) animals in the Las Merindades area of the Province Cet article présente la prévalence des arthropodes ectoparasites of Burgos, Spain. The study revealed that wild animals were more dans des échantillons d’animaux sauvages (n = 128 ; 16 espèces) et infested and with a wider variety of ectoparasites than domestic domestiques (n = 69 ; 3 espèces) dans la région de Las Merindades animals. The parasitic prevalence was 67 % for wild animals and de la province de Burgos, en Espagne. L’étude a révélé que les 48 % for livestock. In this way, 39 % of animals were infected by mammifères sauvages ont été plus infestés et ont été touchés ticks. Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes hexagonus were the most prevalent par une plus grande variété d’ectoparasites que les animaux species whereas Dermacentor reticulatus showed affinity for the domestiques. La prévalence parasitaire a été de 67 % pour les fox and wolf. The overall prevalence of parasitisation by fleas was animaux sauvages et 48 % pour le bétail. Ainsi, 39 % de tous les 27 %. Ctenophthalmus spp. showed the wider range host in wild animaux ont été infectés par les tiques. Ixodes ricinus et Ixodes animals, while Pulex irritans was the most frequent specie found. hexagonus ont été les espèces les plus répandues, alors que The parasitic prevalences by lice (Trichodectes melis, Trichodectes Dermacentor reticulatus a montré une affinité pour le renard et le canis and Trichodectes mustelae) and by mite (Neotrombicula loup. La prévalence globale du parasitisme par les puces a été de spp., Laelaps agilis and Sarcoptes scabiei) were 4 % and 12 %, 27 %. Ctenophtalmus spp a montré la plus large gamme d’hôtes respectively. In both cases only wild animals were found parasited. chez les animaux sauvages, tandis que Pulex irritans a été l’espèce la plus fréquemment trouvée. Les prévalences parasitaires par les poux KEY WORDS: ectoparasites, wild animals, domestic animals, epidemiology, (Trichodectes melis, Trichodectes canis et Trichodectes mustelae) Spain. et par les acariens (Neotrombicula spp., Laelaps agilis et Sarcoptes scabiei) ont été de 4 % et 12 %, respectivement. Dans les deux cas, seuls les animaux sauvages ont été trouvés parasités. MOTS-CLÉS : ectoparasites, animaux sauvages, animaux domestiques, épidémiologie, Espagne. INTRODUCTION Few studies have been undertaken in Spain that has jointly examined the ectoparasites that affect both ild animals and arthropods play important domestic and wild animals. However, the investiga- roles as zoonotic pathogens reservoirs tions and cataloguing work of Encinas (1986), Domín- and/or vectors for humans and domestic guez (2004) and Millán et al. (2007), among others, W have made important contributions to our knowledge animals (Morse, 1995). In the same way, arthropods can transmit a variety of pathogens, such as rickettsias, of the arthropod ectoparasites of Spain. Even so, the borrelias, parasitic hemoprotozoa and certain viruses, information available on these organisms, their hosts, that cause human diseases and serious infections in and the parasitic prevalence is incomplete. livestock. In addition, the behaviour of ectoparasites The aim of the present work is to contribute to the also may cause direct and indirect harm such as irri- knowledge of the distribution of arthropod ectopara- tation, skin inflammation, pruritus, self-wounding, dis- sites in the Las Merindades area, in the Province of turbance and allergic responses (Wall & Shearer, 2001). Burgos, Spain, which lies in the zone of transition between the Cordillera Cantábrica and Sistema Ibé- * Consejería de Sanidad y Bienestar Social de la Junta de Castilla rico mountain ranges. The area represents an enclave y León, Spain. ** Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Universidad de of varied ecosystems (Román et al., 1996) home to Alcalá, Spain. arthropod ectoparasites that could transmit cross Correspondence: Consuelo Giménez-Pardo, Departamento de Micro- diseases to the human, domestic and wild animal biología y Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Alcalá, populations (Bengis et al., 2004). This work is part of Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona, km 33.6, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. Tel.: 34 91 885 46 36 – Fax: 34 91 885 46 60. a wider project to improve our knowledge of ectopa- E-mail: [email protected] rasites inhabiting Spain. Parasite, 2011, 18, 251-260 Original contribution 251 DOMÍNGUEZ-PEÑAFIEL G., GIMÉNEZ-PARDO C., GEGÚNDEZ M.I. & LLEDÓ L.. MATERIALS AND METHODS ANIMAL SAMPLES 197 animals (69 specimens of the three more abundant STUDY AREA livestock species and 128 wild animals included into he study was performed in the Las Merindades 16 species) were examined for arthropod ectopara- area in the Province of Burgos, Spain (42o 55’ sites. Table I shows the composition of these two T52’’ N, 3o 29’ 2’’ W). Mean summer temperatures groups. Not treated livestock came from 20 extensive in this area range between 16 and 20 °C, while mean or semi-extensive farming systems in the study area winter temperatures range between 2 and 5 °C. Rainfall and were examined during 2007. Wild animals were is usually high in winter at some 900-1,100 mm/year. obtained in different periods and by three methods The area is mainly rural, but recreational activities depending on the species. Small mammals were attracting non-residents have increased in recent years. monthly live-trapped and sacrified later, from 2006 to Ticks Fleas Lice+ Mites Animals parasitised Animals examined (N°) n % n % n % n % n % Domestic Cow (35) 12 34 12 34 animals Sheep (26) 7 27 15 58 20 77 Horses (8) 1 13 1 13 Total domestic animals (69) 20 29 15 22 33 48 Wild Roe deer (12) 7 58 7** 58 animals (Capreolus capreolus) Fox (18) 15 83 13 72 6 33S 17 94 (Vulpes vulpes) Wolf (3) 3 100 2 67 1 33 2 67S 3 100 (Canis lupus) American mink (25) 10 40 10 40 (Neovison vison) Badger (7) 1 14 4 57 6 86 6 86 (Meles meles) Beech marten (4) 2 50 3 75 4 100 (Martes foina) Pine marten (3) 2 67 1 33 2 67 (Martes martes) Polecat (2) 1 50 2 100 1 50*M 2 100 (Mustela putorius) Stoat(2) 2 100 1 50 1 50*T 2 100 (Mustela erminea) Genet (1) 1 100 1 100 1 100 (Genetta genetta) Wood mouse (26) 11 42 2 8 5 19*T 15 58 (Apodemus sylvaticus) Yellow-necked mouse (8) 1 12 3 37*T 4 50 (Apodemus flavicollis) Bank vole (6) 2 33 3 50 6 100T 6 100 (Clethrionomys glareolus) Red squirrel (5) 1 20 2 40 3 60 (Sciurus vulgaris) Water vole (3) 1 33 1 33 (Arvicola terrestris) Iberian mole (3) 3 100 3 100 (Talpa occidentalis) Total wild animals (128) 57 45 39 30 8 6 24 19 86 67 Total examined animals (197) 77 39 54 27 8 4 24 12 119 60 N°: number of animals examined; n: number parasitised in each category; %: prevalence, expressed as a percentage. +: Mallophaga; T: mites Trombiculidae; *: mites Mesostigmata; **: on sample also with Hippobosca equina (Diptera); S: sarcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei) in all specimens infested with mites; M: Myobiidae. Table I. – Ectoparasitic arthropods in wild and domestic animals’ prevalence. Parasite, 2011, 18, 251-260 252 Original contribution ECTOPARASITES FROM WILD AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS 2008, except for winter months. Cinegetic species were ectoparasites. Table I shows the hosts of arthropod kindly provided by hunters, during hunting season, species. Ticks and fleas were found on 45 % (CI 95 % between 2005 and 2008. All mustelids and squirrels, [36-54 %]) and 30 % (CI 95 % [22-38 %]) of the wild and other carnivores, found dead (road kill) during animals, respectively, compared to 29 % (CI 95 % [18- this same period, were included in the study. The 40 %]) and 22 % (CI 95 % [12-32 %]) of the domestic. sampled animals were combed and examined under Table II (a, b) shows the species of each group of magnifying glass, and large animals were explored the arthropods parasiting on the different hosts. entire body surface to recovered ticks, fleas, lice and A total of 203 ticks belonging to seven species were mites, which were stored in 70 % ethanol in sterile collected (Table II a) on 77 samples belonging to the tubes. Identifications were made on the basis of mor- three domestic species examined and 13 of the wild phometric characteristics using the keys of Beaucornu animals. The most prevalent with a wide range of & Launay (1990) (fleas), Estrada-Peña (2004) (ticks), hosts was Ixodes ricinus, which was found on 39 ani- Martín-Mateo (1977) (louses) and finally Baker et al. mals of ten host species (ungulates, rodents and car- (1956) and Baker (1999) (mites). nivores). Ixodes hexagonus was found on 23 samples belonging to six hosts, all wild carnivores, except for the wolf and genet. Besides, it was the tick that shows RESULTS the most parasitic intensity on fox, with 51 ticks per animal. Haemaphysalis punctata, the third most pre- he study revealed that 119/197 (60 %) of the valent tick, was found mainly on livestock, meanwhile animals, 86/128 (67 %, CI 95 % [59-75 %]) Dermacentor reticulatus and Ixodes trianguliceps were Tof wild animals and 33/69 (48 %, CI 95 % only present on wild canids (fox and wolf) and wild [35-60 %]) of domestic animals, were infested with rodents (wood mouse and bank vole), respectively.
Recommended publications
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Chewing Lice Heterodoxus Spiniger (Enderlein, 1909) and Trichodectes Canis (De Geer, 1778) on Domestic Dogs at Tabasco, Mexico Author(S): Oswaldo M
    First Report of Chewing Lice Heterodoxus spiniger (Enderlein, 1909) and Trichodectes canis (De Geer, 1778) on Domestic Dogs at Tabasco, Mexico Author(s): Oswaldo M. Torres-Chable, Carlos M. Baak-Baak, Nohemi Cigarroa-Toledo, Claudia V. Zaragoza-Vera, Guadalupe Arjona-Jimenez, Lluvia G. Moreno-Perez, Pablo Medina-Perez, Carlos Machain-Williams, and Julian E. Garcia-Rejon Source: Southwestern Entomologist, 42(2):409-418. Published By: Society of Southwestern Entomologists https://doi.org/10.3958/059.042.0211 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3958/059.042.0211 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. VOL. 42, NO. 2 SOUTHWESTERN ENTOMOLOGIST JUN. 2017 First Report of Chewing Lice Heterodoxus spiniger (Enderlein, 1909) and Trichodectes canis (De Geer, 1778) on Domestic Dogs at Tabasco, Mexico Oswaldo M. Torres-Chable1, Carlos M. Baak-Baak2, Nohemi Cigarroa-Toledo2, Claudia V.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Host Relationships of the Trichodectidae
    TAXONOMY, PHYLOGENY AND HOST RELATIONSHIPS OF THE TRICHODECTIDAE (PHTHIRAPTERA: ISCHITOCERA) by CHRISTOPHER HENRY GOUTTS LYAL, B.Sc. VOLUME 1 October 1983 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the Diploma of Imperial College, Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, London SN7 and Department of Entomology, British Museum (Natural History), London SM7 2 ABSTRACT The external morphology of the Phthiraptera is discussed with particular reference to the Trichodectidae. Structures of the head, thorax and abdomen are examined and homologised, most attention being given to features of potential use in systematic analysis. The homologies of the component parts of the male and female genitalia, hitherto disputed, are established. The characters used by previous workers for systematic placement of the Trichodectidae, Ischnocera, Amblycera, Rhyncophthirina, Anoplura, Phthiraptera and Psocoptera are examined, and a cladistic analysis of these groups performed. The Psocodea and Phthiraptera are found to be holophyletic but the Psocoptera are paraphyletic. The Trichodectidae, Amblycera, Rhyncophthirina and Anoplura are all holophyletic, the Rhynco- phthirina is the sister-group of the Anoplura and the Amblycera the sister-group of all other lice. The Ischnocera is not demonstrably holophyletic, and the exact placement of the Trichodectidae is not determined. A cladistic analysis of the Trichodectidae is performed and the 351 species and subspecies reclassified on the basis of this. Five subfamilies are used to partition the twenty genera employed, ten of the latter being sub-divided into twenty-seven subgenera. One subfamily, three genera and four subgenera are described as new. Three genera are placed in synonymy, eight genera and subgenera are raised from synonymy, and four genera are reduced to subgenera,.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Parasite Associations of the Cratogeomys Fumosus Species Group and Their Chewing Lice, Geomydoecus Alex Popinga, James W
    www.mastozoologiamexicana.org La Portada Colonia reproductiva de lobos marino (Zalopus californicus) en la costa del Pacífico de la isla Margarita, Baja California Sur. Se observa como el macho del grupo vigila y se coloca entre los extraños al grupo y las hembras con crías (Fotografía Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda). Nuestro logo “Ozomatli” El nombre de “Ozomatli” proviene del náhuatl se refiere al símbolo astrológico del mono en el calendario azteca, así como al dios de la danza y del fuego. Se relaciona con la alegría, la danza, el canto, las habilidades. Al signo decimoprimero en la cosmogonía mexica. “Ozomatli” es una representación pictórica de los mono arañas (Ateles geoffroyi). La especie de primate de más amplia distribución en México. “ Es habitante de los bosques, sobre todo de los que están por donde sale el sol en Anáhuac. Tiene el dorso pequeño, es barrigudo y su cola, que a veces se enrosca, es larga. Sus manos y sus pies parecen de hombre; también sus uñas. Los Ozomatin gritan y silban y hacen visajes a la gente. Arrojan piedras y palos. Su cara es casi como la de una persona, pero tienen mucho pelo.” THERYA Volumen 10, número 2 mayo 2019 EDITORIAL The holistic specimen and parasites of mammals Jesús A. Fernández. 65 ARTICLES Detection of Bartonella and Rickettsia in small mammals and their Contenido ectoparasites in México Sokani Sánchez-Montes, Martín Yair Cabrera-Garrido, César A. Ríos-Muñoz, Ali Zeltzin Lira-Olguin; Roxana Acosta-Gutiérrez, Mario Mata-Galindo, Kevin Hernández-Vilchis, D. Melissa Navarrete-Sotelo, Pablo Colunga-Salas, Livia León-Paniagua and Ingeborg Becker.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge's Species List
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2017-06-30 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff June 30, 2017 2 Cover images represent changes to the checklist. Top left: Halobi- sium occidentale observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (https://www. inaturalist.org/observations/6565787). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Top right: Aegialites alaskaensis observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612922). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Bottom left: Fucus distichus observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612338). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Bottom right: Littorina subrotundata observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612398). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 24 Vascular Plants........................................................ 47 Bryophytes .......................................................... 59 Chromista........................................................... 63 Fungi ............................................................. 63 Protozoa............................................................ 72 Non-native species 73
    [Show full text]
  • In the Las Merindades Area (Burgos, Spain) Domínguez-Peñafiel G.*, Giménez-Pardo C.**, Gegúndez M.I.** & Lledó L.**
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. PREVALENCE OF ECTOPARASITIC ARTHROPODS ON WILD ANIMALS AND CATTLE IN THE LAS MERINDADES AREA (BURGOS, SPAIN) DOMÍNGUEZ-PEÑAFIEL G.*, GIMÉNEZ-PARDO C.**, GEGÚNDEZ M.I.** & LLEDÓ L.** Summary: Résumé : PRÉVALENCE DES ARTHROPODES ECTOPARASITES SUR LES ANIMAUX SAUVAGES ET LE BÉTAIL DANS LA RÉGION DE LAS MERINDADES This paper reports the prevalence of ectoparasitic arthropods in (BURGOS, ESPAGNE) sampled groups of wild (n = 128; 16 species) and domestic (n = 69; 3 species) animals in the Las Merindades area of the Province Cet article présente la prévalence des arthropodes ectoparasites of Burgos, Spain. The study revealed that wild animals were more dans des échantillons d’animaux sauvages (n = 128 ; 16 espèces) et infested and with a wider variety of ectoparasites than domestic domestiques (n = 69 ; 3 espèces) dans la région de Las Merindades animals. The parasitic prevalence was 67 % for wild animals and de la province de Burgos, en Espagne. L’étude a révélé que les 48 % for livestock. In this way, 39 % of animals were infected by mammifères sauvages ont été plus infestés et ont été touchés ticks. Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes hexagonus were the most prevalent par une plus grande variété d’ectoparasites que les animaux species whereas Dermacentor reticulatus showed affinity for the domestiques. La prévalence parasitaire a été de 67 % pour les fox and wolf. The overall prevalence of parasitisation by fleas was animaux sauvages et 48 % pour le bétail.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of Trichodectes Canis (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Trichodectidae) from Darwin’S Fox, Pseudalopex Fulvipes (Mammalia: Carnivora: Canidae)
    Eur J Wildl Res (2007) 53:76–79 DOI 10.1007/s10344-006-0066-y SHORT COMMUNICATION First records of Trichodectes canis (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Trichodectidae) from Darwin’s fox, Pseudalopex fulvipes (Mammalia: Carnivora: Canidae) Daniel González-Acuña & Cristóbal Briceño & Armando Cicchino & Stephan M. Funk & Jaime Jiménez Received: 6 July 2006 /Accepted: 14 August 2006 / Published online: 18 October 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract The presence of the dog biting louse, Trichodectes It is endemic to southern Chile, lives within the temperate canis (De Geer, 1778; Ischnocera: Trichodectidae), is reported rainforests of coastal ranges, and often remote from human for the first time in the critically endangered Pseudalopex interference. Its distribution is restricted to the island of fulvipes (Martin, 1837) in Chiloé Island, south Chile. Chiloé in the Tenth Region (42°S, 74°W) and to a smaller population in Nahuelbuta National Park in the Ninth Keywords Trichodectes canis . Phthiraptera . Region on the mainland (37°45′S, 73°00′W; Jiménez and Darwin’s fox . Chile McMahon 2004). This small fox is the rarest and most geographically isolated carnivore in South America with an estimated population of approximately 500 individuals Introduction (Yahnke et al. 1996). The Darwin’s fox is classified by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Darwin’s fox, Pseudalopex fulvipes (Martin, 1837), is one Natural Resources as critically endangered (Jiménez and of the most vulnerable and least known canids in the world. McMahon 2004). Studies of pathogens or parasites from wild canids in D. González-Acuña (*) Chile are scarce. González-Acuña et al. (2003), studying Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias, grey fox Pseudalopex griseus (Gray 1837), reported a Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Concepción, suspected case of canine distemper in Ñuble (Eighth Chillán, Chile Region).
    [Show full text]
  • CANINE ARTHROPODS: CLASS INSECTA Recommendations from the Companion Animal Parasite Council I
    PEER REVIEWED PARASITE PROTOCOLS Parasite Protocols For YOUR Practice CANINE ARTHROPODS: CLASS INSECTA Recommendations from the Companion Animal Parasite Council I. Craig Prior, BVSc, CVJ Murphy Road Animal Hospital Nashville, Tennessee R. William Stich, MS, PhD University of Missouri TABLE 1. Hematophagous Insects That Parasitize Dogs The mission of the Companion Animal Parasite Council POTENTIAL (CAPC) is to foster animal and DIRECT TYPE OF INSECTA PATHOGENS EFFECT ON METAMOR- human health, while preserving CLASS VECTORED TO PETS PHOSIS the human–animal bond, PETS through recommendations Flies Arboviruses Fly strike/worry Complete for the diagnosis, treatment, (order Diptera) Dirofilaria immitis Irritation prevention, and control of Leishmania species Myiasis parasitic infections. For Fleas Bartonella species Anemia Complete more information, including (order Dipetalonema Flea allergy detailed parasite control Siphonaptera) Dipylidium caninum dermatitis Mycoplasma Pruritus recommendations, please visit species capcvet.org. Rickettsia felis and typhi Yersinia pestis ith approximately Sucking lice Bartonella species Anemia Simple 1 million species, (order Anoplura) Rickettsia Depression arthropods compose prowazekii Wthe largest of all Chewing lice Dipylidium caninum Pruritus Simple animal phyla. There are at least (order 6 arthropod classes of medical Mallophaga) importance; this article dis- True bugs Trypanosoma cruzi Papules Simple cusses those in the Insecta class (order that affect dogs in the United Hemiptera) States (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Original Papers New Data on the Prevalence of Trichodectes Melis (Phthiraptera, Trichodectidae) on the European Badger Meles
    Annals of Parasitology 2014, 60(4), 273–276 Copyright© 2014 Polish Parasitological Society Original papers New data on the prevalence of Trichodectes melis (Phthiraptera, Trichodectidae) on the European badger Meles meles (Carnivora, Mustelidae) Paulina Kozina, Aleksandra Gólcz, Joanna N. Izdebska Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland Corresponding author: Paulina Kozina; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Trichodectes melis is a specific ectoparasite of the European badger Meles meles . Distribution of this chewing louse is little known, although presumably it coincides with the range of its typical host. In Poland, it has been found in only a few stands in the western part of the country. It has recently been observed in the area of the Białowieża Primeval Forest, where 81 specimens of T. melis (48 females, 7 males and 26 nymph forms) were collected from two female European badgers, mainly from the fur of the head area. No symptoms of infestation were observed. Key words: Trichodectes melis , Ischnocera, chewing lice, Meles meles , European badger, Białowieża Primeval Forest Introduction Łeba, Międzyzdroje, Suchy Las, and Zielonka, near Poznań [8], the Lower Silesia region [9] and Łódź The louse suborder Ischnocera (Phthiraptera) are [10]. It appears to be absent from many other highly specialized keratophagic parasites mainly of regions. birds and some mammals, living in their fur or Most studies concerning badgers, including their feathers. As a result of the long-term evolution of parasitic fauna, come from areas more or less the parasite-host system, they have acquired transformed by humans, and there is lack data on advanced adaptations conditioning generation of badgers from well-preserved primeval forest host, topical or topographic specificity [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Ursus Arctos)
    International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 5 (2016) 134e138 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijppaw Chewing lice Trichodectes pinguis pinguis in Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos) * Núria Fandos Esteruelas a, , Jonas Malmsten b, Caroline Brojer€ b, Giulio Grandi c, Anders Lindstrom€ c, Paul Brown d, Jon E. Swenson e, f, Alina L. Evans a, Jon M. Arnemo a, g a Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Applied Ecology and Agricultural Sciences, Hedmark University of Applied Sciences, Campus Evenstad, NO-2418 Elverum, Norway b Department of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden c Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden d Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW7 5BD London, UK e Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, PO Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway f Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, PO Box 5685 Sluppen, Trondheim NO-7485, Norway g Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skogsmarksgrand€ Street, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden article info abstract Article history: In April 2014 and 2015, we noted localized alopecia (neck, forelimbs, and chest) and hyperpigmentation Received 4 December 2015 on two adult brown bears (Ursus arctos) captured in central-south Sweden for ecological studies under Received in revised form the Scandinavian Brown Bear Research Project. In spring 2015, a brown bear was shot because of human- 8 February 2016 wildlife conflict in the same region. This bear also had extensive alopecia and hyperpigmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Ectoparasites in Dogs and Cats
    Control of Ectoparasites 3 in Dogs and Cats ESCCAP Guideline 03 Sixth Edition – March 2018 1 ESCCAP Malvern Hills Science Park, Geraldine Road, Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 3SZ, United Kingdom First Published by ESCCAP 2012 © ESCCAP 2012–2019 All rights reserved This publication is made available subject to the condition that any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise is with the prior written permission of ESCCAP. This publication may only be distributed in the covers in which it is first published unless with the prior written permission of ESCCAP. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN: 978-1-907259-65-4 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 SCOPE 6 PRESENT SITUATION AND EMERGING THREATS 6 BIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND CONTROL OF ECTOPARASITES 7 1. Fleas 7 2. Ticks 10 3. Sucking and Chewing Lice 17 4. Phlebotomes/Sand Flies 18 5. Mosquitoes (Culicidae) 19 6. Demodectic Mange Mites 19 7. Sarcoptic Mange Mites 23 8. Notoedric Mange Mites 25 9. Otodectic Mange Mites 26 10. Fur Mites 27 11. Harvest Mites (Chigger Mites) 28 12. Canine Nasal Mites 29 IMPACT OF PET HEALTH AND LIFESTYLE FACTORS 30 RESISTANCE 30 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OF ECTOPARASITES 31 OWNER CONSIDERATIONS IN PREVENTING ZOONOTIC DISEASES 31 STAFF, PET OWNER AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION 31 Control of Ectoparasites 3 in Dogs and Cats ESCCAP Guideline 03 Sixth Edition – March 2018 3 FIGURES Figure 1: Ctenocephalides felis life cycle 7 Figure 2a: Rhipicephalus sanguineus 12 Figure 2b: Dermacentor reticulatus 13 Figure 3: Ixodes ricinus life cycle 15 Figure 4: Louse life cycle 17 Figure 5: Sand fly life cycle 18 Figure 6: Mosquito life cycle 19 Figure 7: Demodex spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Phthiraptera and Siphonaptera) 833 Doi: 10.3897/Biorisk.4.65 RESEARCH ARTICLE Biorisk
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(2): 833–849 (2010)Chapter 13.4: Lice and Fleas (Phthiraptera and Siphonaptera) 833 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.65 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Lice and Fleas (Phthiraptera and Siphonaptera) Chapter 13.4 Marc Kenis1, Alain Roques2 1 CABI Europe-Switzerland, 1, Rue des Grillons, CH- 2800, Delémont, Switzerland 2 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UR 0633, Station de Zoologie Forestière, 2163 Av. Pomme de Pin, 45075 Orléans, France Corresponding authors: Marc Kenis ([email protected]), Alain Roques ([email protected]) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 26 March 2010 | Accepted 25 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Kenis M, Roques A (2010) Lice and Fleas (Phthiraptera and Siphonaptera). Chapter 13.4. In: Roques A et al. (Eds) Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe. BioRisk 4(1): 833–849. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.65 Abstract A total of 31 Phthiraptera species alien to Europe are listed. Th ey include 24 chewing lice and seven suck- ing lice of 12 diff erent families. Th e families Goniodidae (Ischnocera) and Menoponidae (Amblycera) largely dominate the alien entomofauna of chewing lice. Asia is the major supplier of alien Phthiraptera which are mostly associated with poultry farming, game birds, guinea pigs and invasive alien mammals. Th e recent period did not show any acceleration in alien arrival in Europe. Alien fl eas include six species in the families Pulicidae and Ceratophyllidae. Th ree of them are primarily associated with rats and are capable of transmiting major human diseases such as the bubonic plague and the murine typhus.
    [Show full text]