Disaster Risk Management Programs for Priority Countries Disaster Risk Management Programs for Priority Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Disaster Risk Management Programs for Priority Countries Disaster Risk Management Programs for Priority Countries Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery Disaster Risk Management Programs for Priority Countries Disaster Risk Management Programs for Priority Countries Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery 2011 This volume is a product of the staff of the The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Design: [email protected] / III CONTENTS FOREWORD / v 2009 Priority Countries AFRICA Donor Earmarked Countries Burkina Faso / 2 Ethiopia / 17 East ASIA AND PACIFIC Ghana / 32 Cambodia / 288 Malawi / 47 Lao PDR / 297 Mali / 70 Philippines / 305 Mozambique / 97 Vanuatu / 316 Senegal / 108 Togo / 138 LatIN AMERICA & CaRIbbEAN Colombia / 332 East ASIA AND PACIFIC Costa Rica / 342 Indonesia / 154 Ecuador / 354 Marshall Islands / 164 Guatemala / 364 Papua New Guinea / 177 Solomon Islands / 188 SOUTH ASIA Vietnam / 198 Bangladesh / 376 Pakistan / 386 EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Sri Lanka / 399 Kyrgyz Republic / 216 Prospective Country LatIN AMERICA & CaRIbbEAN Haiti / 228 Fiji / 412 Panama / 242 MIDDLE EasT & NORTH AFRICA Djibouti / 256 Republic of Yemen / 264 SOUTH ASIA Nepal / 278 / V FOREWOrd This is the 2nd edition of the Disaster Risk Management Program for Priority Countries, originally published by GFDRR in 2009. It now includes the country programs missing in the first edition (Burkina Faso, Malawi, Mali, Senegal, and Philippines1) as well as an update of the DRM Country Program for Haiti (to take into account the impact of the January 2010 earthquake), Panama, Guatemala, Ecuador, Colombia, Costa Rica As indicated in the previous edition, the presented programs are indicative; as the detailed planning and implementation phases have started, further dialogue with the Governments and other partners has refined the agendas and prioritized interventions. 13 country programs have already received an initial allocation totaling $22.86M, representing 25.25% of the total $90.522M planned for these country programs. Ethiopia ($1.75M), Malawi ($1M), Mali ($1.4M), Mozambique ($1.46M), Nepal ($1.8M), Senegal ($1.4M), Solomon Islands ($2M), Togo ($1.75M), Indonesia ($2M), Vietnam ($2M), Djibouti ($1M), Haiti ($4.8M) and Panama ($500k). In each priority country, GFDRR has hired DRM Specialists to facilitate a more effective implementation of the respective country programs as well as a greater DRR harmonization at the country level among all the key partners, including better integration of the DRR and climate adaptation as part of the overall national development agendas. GFDRR is in the process of implementing its Results Agenda, which remains one of its top priorities. The GFDRR Results Model provides an innovative way forward and a methodology for quantifying DRM Mainstreaming Progress and Impacts across all priority countries, which will further strengthen the strategic positioning of our efforts. Preliminary operationalization of the GFDRR Results Framework has resulted in unearthing key findings, which in turn completes the virtuous cycle of mainstreaming a results-based thinking in everything that GFDRR does. The ability to view GFDRR impact on country performance helps GFDRR strategically focus on its portfolio of countries. The ability to measure our impact in a country and to be able to look at the performance of that country simultaneously would help us in strategically positioning our efforts to be able to extract the most return on investment with respect to developmental impact. At its 5th meeting in Copenhagen in November 2008, the GFDRR Consultative Group asked the Secretariat to focus on a select group of priority countries to achieve increased impact. In GFDRR’s Track II, Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction in Development, this lead to a prioritization of operations in 20 core countries, including Burkina Faso, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Ghana, Haiti, Indonesia, Kyrgyz Republic, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mozambique, Nepal, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Senegal, Solomon Islands, Togo, Vietnam, and Republic of Yemen. 1 The formulation of the DRM program for Madagascar was put on hold because of the political situation but should resume soon. VI / DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS FOR PRIORITY COUNTRIES The countries were selected due to their high vulnerability to natural hazards and low economic resilience to cope with disaster impacts including anticipated climate change and variability. Two thirds of the countries are least developed countries and twelve are highly indebted poor countries. Nine are from Africa and several others are Small Island States at high risk. These 20 core countries will receive 80 percent of available funds while 20 percent will be made available for flexible, innovative, high impact grants, such as those that catalyze increased investment programs and integration of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in development in any disaster prone country. GFDRR will also systemize and deepen its engagement in eleven single donor trust fund countries, including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Lao PDR, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Philippines, and Vanuatu, using funding made available by the concerned donors. To develop a strategic and integrated vision, GFDRR is preparing comprehensive programs for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation for the next three to five years in each of the priority and donor earmarked countries. The Development Process of Programs A multi-stakeholder planning process lays the foundation for the comprehensive national programs for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. The process ensures the facilitation of ownership by governments for their risk reduction agenda and the initiation of larger strategic partnerships and disaster risk reduction platforms. In each priority country, the following steps are undertaken to develop the country programs: 1. Investigation of a) the underlying risk factors and b) the progress in the five priority areas of the Hyogo Framework for Action; 2. stocktaking of ongoing risk reduction and climate change adaptation programs by key stakeholders, including UN agencies, multilateral and bilateral donors, and other partners; 3. identification of key gaps at national, sector, and local levels; 4. solicitation of proposals from different government and non-government entities and concerned donor agencies; 5. analysis of the solicited proposals and consensus building in a consultative process involving a range of stakeholders, including relevant government ministries, UN organizations, multilateral and bilateral donors, IN GOs and civil society actors; 6. development of strategic comprehensive programs of support based on the gathered information. Criteria used for the selection of the proposed activities include the relevance in addressing underlying risk factors, the leveraging potential of future disaster risk management interventions, and meeting the challenge of increased risk reduction activity synchronization and synergy building across various donors and thereby improving the quality and effectiveness of donor aid in the DRM arena. Achieving Outcomes A set of priorities has emerged which will drive the GFDRR supported risk reduction agenda for the next three to five years. Knowledge, advisory, and capacity building on all levels. Many countries are undergoing a substantial shift in DRM structures, roles and responsibilities away from classical disaster response functions to multi-sectoral and ministerial development agendas around risk reduction and climate change. It will require a strong investment in national capacities GLOBAL FACILITY FOR DISASTER REDUCTION AND RECOVERY / VII for Governments to lead and implement the comprehensive risk reduction agendas and to coordinate between ministries. Local authorities at district level will also require technical support to put new strategies into practice. Intensified support for sectoral mainstreaming. The programs identify the Governments’ demand for technical and managerial support to develop sector specific risk reduction strategies and priority program investments. The most urgent investments are linked to the hydro-meteorological sector in flood protection and mitigation of storm damages due to increased severity of changing weather patterns. Coordination of disaster risk management and climate change adaption agendas. Disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation should largely be managed as one integrated agenda. Both agendas have a few differences but many overlaps. Many of the country programs aim to integrate the two agendas and strengthen the coordination between climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction institutions. The resulting climate risk management approach treats existing and future climate-related risks as one continuum, generates social and economic benefits in the short term, while also reducing vulnerability to long-term changes in climate. Comprehensive risk assessments. Many countries have made progress in sector specific hazard assessments but there is practically no targeted country
Recommended publications
  • Planning and Implementing Ecosystem Based Adaptation (Eba) in Djibouti’S Dikhil and Tadjourah Regions
    5/6/2020 WbgGefportal Project Identification Form (PIF) entry – Full Sized Project – GEF - 7 Planning and implementing Ecosystem based Adaptation (EbA) in Djibouti’s Dikhil and Tadjourah regions Part I: Project Information GEF ID 10180 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund LDCF CBIT/NGI CBIT NGI Project Title Planning and implementing Ecosystem based Adaptation (EbA) in Djibouti’s Dikhil and Tadjourah regions Countries Djibouti Agency(ies) UNEP Other Executing Partner(s) Executing Partner Type Ministry of Habitat, Urbanism, and Environment Government GEF Focal Area Climate Change Taxonomy Biodiversity, Biomes, Climate Change, Climate Change Adaptation, Focal Areas, Sustainable Land Management, Land Degradation, Land Degradation Neutrality, Private Sector, Type of Engagement, Civil Society, Stakeholders, Communications, Gender Mainstreaming, Gender Equality, Gender results areas, Food Security in Sub-Sahara Africa, Integrated Programs, Sustainable Cities, Capacity, Knowledge and Research, Knowledge Generation, Food Security, Land Productivity, Income Generating Activities, Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Sustainable Livelihoods, Sustainable Agriculture, Improved Soil and Water Management Techniques, Ecosystem Approach, Drought Mitigation, Wetlands, Least Developed Countries, Livelihoods, Mainstreaming adaptation, Climate resilience, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, Beneficiaries, Participation, Information Dissemination, Consultation, Behavior change, Awareness Raising, Public Campaigns, SMEs, Community Based
    [Show full text]
  • Horn of Africa Crisis Situation Report No
    Horn of Africa Crisis Situation Report No. 28 23 December 2011 This report is produced by OCHA Eastern Africa in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It is issued by OCHA in New York. It covers the period from 16 to 23 December. The next report will be issued on 30 December. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES • Tensions remain high in North Eastern Province of Kenya following a series of explosive attacks targeting military and police convoys in the area. • Aid workers have further reduced operations in the Dadaab refugee camps following heightened insecurity. • WHO has called on health partners to intensify cholera preventative activities in Mogadishu following an increase in cases. II. Situation Overview While drought conditions have eased in many locations due to the recent rains, drought conditions are expected to worsen in parts of the Horn of Africa in the coming months as the dry season sets in. A new food security analysis of the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system in Djibouti has indicated that the food security situation in Obock Region has deteriorated from ‘Stressed’ (IPC Phase 2) to ‘Crisis’ (IPC Phase 3).Deterioration in food security conditions is now likely in coastal and southeast areas as well. In Ethiopia, even as the seasonal deyr (October-December) rains continue in most lowland areas of southern and south-eastern Ethiopia, drought conditions are expected to worsen in the northernmost parts of the Afar Region and parts of northern Somali Region in the coming month. On the other hand, drought conditions in the northern, north-eastern and southern parts of Kenya have significantly eased following good rainfall received in the October-December short rains season.In Somalia, while the deyr rains have subsided in many parts of Lower and Middle Juba regions, flooding continues to affect many settlements in Middle Juba.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Adaptation in the Arab States Best Practices and Lessons Learned
    Climate Change Adaptation in the Arab States Best practices and lessons learned United Nations Development Programme 2018 | 1 UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. On the ground in nearly 170 countries and territories, we offer global perspective and local insight to help empower lives and build resilient nations. www.undp.org The Global Environment Facility (GEF) was established on the eve of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit to help tackle our planet’s most pressing environmental problems. Since then, the GEF has provided over $17 billion in grants and mobilized an additional $88 billion in financing for more than 4000 projects in 170 countries. Today, the GEF is an international partnership of 183 countries, international institutions, civil society organizations and the private sector that addresses global environmental issues. www.thegef.org United Nations Development Programme July 2018 Copyright © UNDP 2018 Manufactured in Bangkok Bangkok Regional Hub (BRH) United Nations Development Programme 3rd Floor United Nations Service Building Rajdamnern Nok Avenue, Bangkok, 10200, Thailand www.adaptation-undp.org Authors: The report preparation was led by Tom Twining-Ward in close collaboration with Kishan Khoday, with Cara Tobin as lead author and Fadhel Baccar, Janine Twyman Mills, Walid Ali and Zubair Murshed as contributing authors. The publication was professionally reviewed by fellow UNDP colleagues, Amal Aldababseh, Greg Benchwick, Hanan Mutwaki, Mohamed Bayoumi, and Walid Ali. Valuable external expert review, comments, and suggestions were provided by Hussein El-Atfy (Arab Water Council), Ibrahim Abdel Gelil (Arabian Gulf University), and William Dougherty (Climate Change Research Group).
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Non-Contributory Social Protection Programmes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region Through a Child and Equity Lens
    UNICEF/Romenzi Overview of Non-contributory Social Protection Programmes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region Through a Child and Equity Lens Anna Carolina Machado, Charlotte Bilo, Fábio Veras Soares and Rafael Guerreiro Osorio International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Copyright© 2018 International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Children’s Fund This publication is one of the outputs of the UN to UN agreement between the International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) – and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Middle East and North Africa Regional Office (MENARO). The International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) is a partnership between the United Nations and the Government of Brazil to promote South–South learning on social policies. The IPC-IG is linked to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Brazil, the Ministry of Planning, Development, Budget and Management of Brazil (MP) and the Institute for Applied Economic Research (Ipea) of the Government of Brazil. Research Coordinators Research Assistants Anna Carolina Machado (IPC-IG) Anna Davidsen, Anne Esser, Charlotte Bilo (IPC-IG) Barbara Branco, Caroline Scott, Fábio Veras Soares (IPC-IG) Elena Kühne, Fernando Damazio, Rafael Guerreiro Osorio (Ipea and IPC-IG) Lara Aquino and Yasmin Scheufler Researchers United Nations Online Volunteers Eunice Godevi (IPC-IG, DAAD fellow) Dorsaf James, Mohamed Ayman, Imane Helmy (IPC-IG, independent consultant) Sarah Abo Alasrar and Susan Jatkar Joana Mostafa (Ipea) Pedro Arruda (IPC-IG) Designed by the IPC-IG Raquel Tebaldi (IPC-IG) Publications team: Sergei Soares (Ipea and IPC-IG) Roberto Astorino, Flávia Amaral, Wesley Silva (IPC-IG) Rosa Maria Banuth and Manoel Salles Rights and permissions – all rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPSTONE 20-2 Africa Field Study Trip Book Part II
    CAPSTONE 20-2 Africa Field Study Trip Book Part II Subject Page Djibouti ....................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 2 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 21 Culture Gram .......................................................... 26 Kenya ......................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 35 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 56 Culture Gram .......................................................... 60 Niger .......................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 70 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 90 Culture Gram .......................................................... 94 Senegal ...................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 103 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 123 Culture Gram .......................................................... 128 Africa :: Djibouti — The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency Page 1 of 19 AFRICA :: DJIBOUTI Introduction :: DJIBOUTI Background: The French Territory of the Afars and the Issas became Djibouti in 1977. Hassan Gouled APTIDON installed an authoritarian one-party state and proceeded to serve as president
    [Show full text]
  • Djibouti Annual Country Report 2019 Country Strategic Plan 2018 - 2019 Table of Contents
    SAVING LIVES CHANGING LIVES Djibouti Annual Country Report 2019 Country Strategic Plan 2018 - 2019 Table of contents Summary 3 Context and Operations 6 CSP financial overview 8 Programme Performance 9 Strategic outcome 01 9 Strategic outcome 02 10 Strategic outcome 03 11 Strategic outcome 04 13 Strategic outcome 05 14 Cross-cutting Results 16 Progress towards gender equality 16 Protection 16 Accountability to affected populations 17 Environment 17 Extra section 19 Data Notes 19 Figures and Indicators 21 WFP contribution to SDGs 21 Beneficiaries by Age Group 23 Beneficiaries by Residence Status 23 Annual Food Transfer 23 Annual Cash Based Transfer and Commodity Voucher 25 Strategic Outcome and Output Results 26 Cross-cutting Indicators 48 Djibouti | Annual Country Report 2019 2 Summary Throughout 2019, WFP Djibouti took significant steps towards achieving results as defined by the five Strategic Outcomes under its Transitional Interim Country Strategic Plan (T-ICSP). The initial implementation period was extended from June to December 2019 through a Budget Revision – an opportunity to further tailor WFP’s interventions based on the evolving context. Subsequent programme modifications based on lessons learned were integrated into the new Country Strategic Plan (2020-2024), approved by WFP’s Executive Board in November 2019. Contributing to the Government’s efforts to achieve Sustainable Development (SDG) Goal 2: Zero Hunger, WFP’s partnership with the government continued to be pivotal in addressing the food and nutrition needs of the most vulnerable Djiboutian households, as well as refugees and asylum seekers. Across the T-ICSP, WFP reached a total of 120,000 beneficiaries[1] through a combination of 4,905 mt unconditional resource transfers (in-kind food) and entitlements (cash-based transfers, CBT) valued at approximately USD 2 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Djibouti Annual Country Report 2018 Country Strategic Plan 2018 - 2019 ACR Reading Guidance Table of Contents Summary
    SAVING LIVES CHANGING LIVES Djibouti Annual Country Report 2018 Country Strategic Plan 2018 - 2019 ACR Reading Guidance Table of contents Summary . 4 Context and Operations . 7 Programme Performance - Resources for Results . 9 Programme Performance . 10 Strategic Outcome 01 . 10 Strategic Outcome 02 . 11 Strategic Outcome 03 . 12 Strategic Outcome 04 . 12 Strategic Outcome 05 . 13 Cross-cutting Results . 15 Progress towards gender equality . 15 Protection . 15 Accountability to affected populations . 15 Environment . 16 Story Worth Telling . 17 Figures and Indicators . 18 Data Notes . 18 Beneficiaries by Age Group . 19 Beneficiaries by Residence Status . 20 Annual Food Distribution (mt) . 20 Annual CBT and Commodity Voucher Distribution (USD) . 22 Output Indicators . 23 Outcome Indicators . 26 Cross-cutting Indicators . 48 Progress towards gender equality . 48 Accountability to affected populations . 50 Djibouti | Annual country report 2018 2 Environment . 51 Djibouti | Annual country report 2018 3 Summary WFP Djibouti moved to a Transitional Interim Country Strategic Plan (T-ICSP) Djibouti is major Hub for logistics support to Ethiopia and South Sudan, also next which covers the period from January 2018 to June 2019 and guides WFP to Yemen. Bulk grain transit deliveries amounted to nine vessels, 132,000 metric intervention strategy pending the formulation of the Country Strategic Plan tons (mt) in total, forwarded on 3,800 trucks. In addition, the WFP silos were 2020-2024. Through the ICSP, WFP worked to enhance the resilience of the operated for the first time with 28,000 mt of sorghum dispatched to Ethiopia. chronically vulnerable rural and urban population, while addressing WFP Djibouti also faced several challenges in the implementation of its various malnutrition, and strengthening the systems and institutions with an objective of operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Document Template
    United Nations Development Programme Country: ____DJIBOUTI___________ Project Document Project Title: Developing agro-pastoral shade gardens as an adaptation strategy for poor rural communities Rural communities and Ecosystems are more resilient to climate UNDAF Outcome(s): change Expected CP Outcome(s): Expected Output(s): Good adaptation practices of rural communities are strengthened Implementing Partner: Ministry of Habitat, Urbanism and Environment of Djibouti Responsible Parties: Ministry of Habitat, Urbanism and Environment of Djibouti Brief Description The project objective is to improve resilience of rural communities of Djibouti to the recurrent droughts induced by climate change. The project will help the communities of the target regions of Grand and Petit Bara to develop adaptive capacity and embark on climate resilient economic development. The project is comprised of three main components: 1. Sustainable access to secured water resources in the face of climate change; 2. Shade gardens to support diversified and climate-resilient agro-pastoral production system; 3. Access to secured finance for climate resilient agro-pastoral enterprise development. Programme Period: 2012 – 2017 AWP budget: USD 4,658,556 Key Result Area (Strategic Plan): Energy and Environment for Strategic Development; Disaster Risk Total resources required USD 4,658,556 Reduction Atlas Award ID: 00066414 Total allocated resources: USD 4,658,556 Project ID: 00082602 PIMS ID: 4683 • Regular (TRAC) Start date: 2012 • Other: End Date 2017 o Adaptation Fund USD 4,658,556 PAC Meeting Date 23 July 2012 Unfunded budget: __N/A_______ Management Arrangements __NIM________ In-kind Contributions Noms Signatures Date SE Hassan Omar Mohamed Ministry of Habitat, Urbanism and Environnement Hodan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Djibouti 2012 Consolidated Appeal
    SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS AARREC CRS Humedica MENTOR TGH ACF CWS IA MERLIN UMCOR ACTED DanChurchAid ILO Muslim Aid UNAIDS ADRA DDG IMC NCA UNDP Africare DiakonieEmerg. Aid INTERMON NPA UNDSS AMI-France DRC Internews NRC UNEP ARC EM-DH INTERSOS OCHA UNESCO ASB FAO IOM OHCHR UNFPA ASI FAR IPHD OXFAM UN-HABITAT AVSI FHI IR PA UNHCR CARE FinnChurchAid IRC PACT UNICEF CARITAS FSD IRD PAI UNIFEM CEMIR International GAA IRIN Plan UNJLC CESVI GOAL IRW PMU-I UNMAS CFA GTZ Islamic Relief Première Urgence UNOPS CHF GVC JOIN RC/Germany UNRWA CHFI Handicap International JRS RCO VIS CISV HealthNet TPO LWF Samaritan's Purse WFP CMA HELP Malaria Consortium Save the Children WHO CONCERN HelpAge International Malteser SECADEV World Concern COOPI HKI Mercy Corps Solidarités World Relief CORDAID Horn Relief MDA SUDO WV COSV HT MDM TEARFUND ZOA MEDAIR Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 Humanitarian Dashboard .................................................................................................................... 2 Table I. Summary of requirements (grouped by cluster) ................................................................ 5 Table II. Summary of requirements (grouped by appealing organization) ..................................... 5 Table III. Summary of requirements (grouped by priority) ............................................................ 5 2. 2011 IN REVIEW ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Plan (In Us$)
    GEF-6 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: FULL SIZED PROJECT TYPE OF TRUST FUND: GEF TRUST FUND For more information about GEF, visit TheGEF.org PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Title: Sustainable management of water resources, rangelands and agro-pastoral perimeters in the Cheikhetti Wadi watershed of Djibouti Country Republic of Djibouti GEF Project ID: 9599 GEF Agency: UNDP GEF Agency Project ID: 5921 Other Ministry of Housing, Urban Planning and Environment (MHUPE) Submission Date: 25 July 2016 Executing through the Directorate for Environment and Sustainable 1st Re-submission Date 14 Oct 2016 Partner: Development (DESD); with Ministry of Agriculture, Water, nd Fisheries, Husbandry and Marine Resources (MAWFHMR) 2 Re-submission Date 02 Nov 2016 GEF Focal Land Degradation Project Duration (mths) 60 Areas: IAP IAP-Cities IAP-Commodities IAP-Food Security Corporate Program: SGP Parent program: N/A Agency Fee ($) 305,432 A. INDICATIVE FOCAL AREA STRATEGY FRAMEWORK AND OTHER PROGRAM STRATEGIES Trust GEF Project Co-financing Objectives/Programs (Focal Areas, IAP, Corporate Programs) Fund Financing ($) (in $) LD-1: Agriculture and Rangeland Systems: Maintain or improve flow of agro-ecosystem GEF- 1,607,534 6,760,000 services to sustain food production and livelihoods. P 1: Agro-ecological Intensification TF LD-1: Agriculture and Rangeland Systems: Maintain or improve flow of agro-ecosystem GEF- 1,607,534 6,760,000 services to sustain food production and livelihoods. P 2: SLM for Climate-Smart Agriculture TF Total Project Cost 3,215,068 13,520,000 B. INDICATIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Project Objective: Develop an integrated model for the restoration of agropastoral ecosystem services in the Cheikhetti Wadi watershed to reduce land and water degradation, improve self-sufficiency in basic living needs of vulnerable rural communities and create conditions to enable its replication (in $) Project Trust Type Project Outcomes Project Outputs Co- Components Fund GEF financing Component 1.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: PAD1930 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF US$23.3 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized TO THE REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI FOR A DJIBOUTI: SUSTAINABLE ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM (May 12, 2017) Public Disclosure Authorized Energy and Extractives Global Practice Middle East and North Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Exchange Rate Effective as of March 31, 2017 Currency Unit = Djibouti Franc (DJF) DJF 178.88 = US$1 US1 = SDR 0.73700114 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADDS Djiboutian Agency for Social Development (Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social) ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan CAPEX Capital expenditure CPS Country Partnership Strategy DA Designated Account DISED National Agency for Statistics (Direction de la Statistiques et des Etudes Démographiques) EBIT Earnings Before Interest and Taxes EDD Djibouti’s National Electricity Utility (Electricité de Djibouti) EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return FM Financial Management FO Financial Officer ICR Implementation Completion and Results
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Internal Ex-Post Evaluation for Development Planning
    Internal Ex-Post Evaluation for Development Planning Project conducted by Djibouti Representative Office: November, 2018 Country Name The Master Plan Study Project for Sustainable Irrigation and Farming in Southern Djibouti Republic of Djibouti I. Project Outline Djibouti was a typical nation depending on transit trade economy, of which service sector such as intermediate trading, service activities at Djibouti port and others covered the large part of Djibouti’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Because of its severe natural condition, its GDP from primary industry sector, agricultural production, was quite small. Thus, a rate of the food self-sufficiency was very low and most of food for the population depended on imports from outside. More than half of local population depended mainly on animal husbandry, however, the number of livestocks decreased partly due to the effects of climate change and the severe droughts which had caused the reduction of natural pastures in the grazing land. Thus, many livelihoods of pastoral people were Background supported by labor workings of family members such as works at the port in Djibouti City. Its chance and income of labor working, therefore, were not stable. In order to cope with these severe situations, the Government of Djibouti set a policy that livelihood of the local pastoral people should be improved through agricultural activities. Accordingly, the Ministry of Agriculture, Water, Fisheries, Livestock and Marine Resources (MAEPE-RH) instructed the project formation of irrigation and agriculture development in southern regions where water resources for agriculture products were not abundant with limited agricultural technology. Therefore, it was urgently needed to establish and develop sustainable irrigation farming by obtaining stable water resources and establishing farming system applicable to the local condition.
    [Show full text]