DOCSLIB.ORG

Rules and Regulations:

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rules and Regulations: RULES AND REGULATIONS November 1, 2016 November 1, 2016 This Page Intentionally Blank November 1, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - PREFACE .....................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Authority: .......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Purpose: .........................................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Contents: ........................................................................................................................................1-1 1.4 Compliance: ...................................................................................................................................1-1 1.5 Enforcement: .................................................................................................................................1-2 1.6 Deviations: .....................................................................................................................................1-2 SECTION 2 - GENERAL ....................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Right of CEO to Control the Airport: ..............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Labor Disputes: ..............................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Commercial Activity: ......................................................................................................................2-2 2.4 Soliciting: ........................................................................................................................................2-2 2.5 Loitering: ........................................................................................................................................2-2 2.6 Carriage of Firearms: ......................................................................................................................2-2 2.7 Private Armed Guards and Guard Dogs: ........................................................................................2-2 2.8 Lost and Found Articles: .................................................................................................................2-2 2.9 Litter and Refuse: ...........................................................................................................................2-3 2.10 Dogs and Other Animals: ...............................................................................................................2-3 2.11 Smoking: ........................................................................................................................................2-3 2.12 Commercial/Non-Commercial Filming, Student Filming and Photography: .................................2-4 2.13 Advertisements: .............................................................................................................................2-5 2.14 Airport Signs: ..................................................................................................................................2-5 2.15 Passenger Elevators and Escalators: ..............................................................................................2-5 2.16 Tenant Conduct Regarding Unauthorized Activities:.....................................................................2-6 2.17 Tenant Construction Requirements: ..............................................................................................2-6 2.18 Airport Construction and Obstruction Control: .............................................................................2-6 2.19 Damage to Airport Property: .........................................................................................................2-6 2.20 Bird Hazard Reduction - Wildlife Hazard Management: ................................................................2-7 2.21 Plastic Covers: ................................................................................................................................2-8 2.22 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Drones): ..........................................................................................2-8 SECTION 3 - AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ..............................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Definitions: .....................................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Compliance: ...................................................................................................................................3-2 3.3 Aircraft Incident/Accident Reporting: ............................................................................................3-2 November 1, 2016 3.4 Disabled Aircraft: ...........................................................................................................................3-2 3.5 Protection of Aircraft: ....................................................................................................................3-3 3.6 Aircraft Parking Responsibility: ......................................................................................................3-4 3.7 Aircraft Repairs/Maintenance: .......................................................................................................3-4 3.8 Starting or Running of Aircraft Engines: .........................................................................................3-5 3.9 High Power Run of Aircraft Engines (Run-up): ...............................................................................3-7 3.10 Air Traffic Rules: .............................................................................................................................3-7 3.11 Aircraft Movement on Air Operations Area (AOA): .......................................................................3-8 3.12 Intersection Departures: ..............................................................................................................3-10 3.13 Helicopter Operations: .................................................................................................................3-10 3.14 Use of Unsafe Areas: ....................................................................................................................3-10 3.15 Aircraft Power-Back Operations: .................................................................................................3-11 3.16 Small Aircraft: ...............................................................................................................................3-11 3.17 Taxiing Into or Out of Hangars: ....................................................................................................3-11 3.18 Aircraft Lighting During Hours of Darkness: .................................................................................3-11 3.19 Aircraft Operations in Low Visibility and Adverse Weather Conditions: .....................................3-11 3.20 Flight Training and Student Pilots: ...............................................................................................3-12 3.21 Aircraft Operators and Intoxicants or Drugs: ...............................................................................3-12 3.22 Charter and Itinerant Aircraft: .....................................................................................................3-12 3.23 Into-Plane Refueling: ....................................................................................................................3-13 3.24 Markings, Signs and Signals: ........................................................................................................3-13 3.25 Washing of Aircraft: .....................................................................................................................3-14 3.26 Painting Guidelines for Aircraft Aprons, Cargo Ramps, Taxiways and Taxilanes:........................3-14 3.27 Aircraft Movement Area Lighting - Energy Conservation: ...........................................................3-14 3.28 Fees: .............................................................................................................................................3-15 SECTION 4 - AIRPORT FACILITIES, AIRCRAFT PARKING AND PASSENGER TERMINAL GATE USE .....................4-1 4.1 General Aviation (GA) Aircraft Parking Restrictions:......................................................................4-1 4.2 Air Carrier (Airline) Aircraft Parking: ..............................................................................................4-2 4.3 Aircraft Parking Positions - Maximum Aircraft Size Limitations: ....................................................4-3 4.4 Ground Support Equipment (GSE) Parking and Storage: ...............................................................4-8 4.5 Passenger Enplaning and Deplaning: ...........................................................................................4-10 4.6 Diverted Aircraft and Alternate Airport Operations: ...................................................................4-10 4.7 Screening Procedures for Charter Operations: ...........................................................................4-11
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Injuries and Fatalities of Workers Struck by Vehicles on Airport Aprons
    REPORT TO CONGRESS Injuries and Fatalities of Workers Struck by Vehicles on Airport Aprons Prepared by U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Office of the Associate Administrator for Airports July 2002 I. Executive Summary Section 520 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) required the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to conduct the study described below and report the results to Congress by April 5, 2001: The Administrator shall conduct a study to determine the number of persons working at airports who are injured or killed as a result of being struck by a moving vehicle while on an airport tarmac, the seriousness of the injuries to such persons, and whether or not reflective safety vests or other actions should be required to enhance the safety of such workers. A review of the FAA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) databases found that between 1985 and August 2000, 11 workers were fatally injured when struck by vehicles on airport aprons. Of the 11 fatalities, only two occurred between 1995 and 2000. Increased emphasis on ramp safety by the airline industry and airports could be a contributing factor to the decline in “struck by” injuries. The lack of comprehensive nonfatal injury data makes it impossible to determine accurately the number and severity of nonfatal struck by injuries. The data suggest that airline industry workers actually sustain significantly fewer struck by injuries than workers in most other industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Know How You'll Go Looking After #1 Starts with the Right Seat, Supplies and Strategies for Small Spaces
    get to know how you'll go looking after #1 starts with the right seat, supplies and strategies for small spaces Bring supplies to help you wait longer between Can you transfer with minimal help? bathroom visits and look after your needs from no Flying on a larger plane with >30 seats or 2 aisles? your seat with minimal help. Can you do your bathroom routine independently? yes aisle chair & lavatory supplies Use a large scarf/blanket for privacy at your You need: seat while you look after your needs. you can The ability to do a 90° or 180° transfer or a standing pivot transfer. To do your bathroom routine independently also ask a flight attendant to ask seatmates to Good sitting balance when supported give you a moment alone. Use an overnight-sized collection bag for long Aircraft 30+ seats (Canada)/60+ seats & 2 aisles (US) must have an flights & bring a spare with you! on-board aisle chair for getting to the bathroom. "Accessible" lavs in Boeing 787 Drain from collection bag or catheter into 1L Let your airline know you need one when you confirm 72-48 hrs in advance. plastic water bottle with lid The standard aircraft lavatory (bathroom) Ask a companion to drain bottle into toilet for requires a 180° transfer or a stand & pivot you, or keep it in a carry-on until landing. transfer in a very small space! strategies "Accessible" aircraft lavatories are a few Minimize water intake the day before & inches wider, sometimes using a sliding during travel and avoid caffeine and alcohol.
    [Show full text]
  • WACS) for Passenger (PAX) and Cargo Aircraft
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED Statement of Work (SOW) for the Provision of RFP PRE21005 Worldwide Aircraft Charter Services (WACS) for Passenger (PAX) and Cargo Aircraft Prepared by NSPA VERSION 1.00 Amendment Record Revision/ Reference(s) Page(s) Date Of Issue Remarks Amendment 1st ISSUE All All 3 DECEMBER 2020 - For BCR All All All 23 February 2021 PRO NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) CAPELLEN (Grand Duchy of LUXEMBOURG) NATO UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents PART 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 3 PART 2. LEGAL STATUS OF NSPA AND THE CONTRACTOR ............................................................ 3 PART 3. LIABILITY OF THE CARRIER ................................................................................................... 4 PART 4. AUTHORIZED AIR OPERATOR ............................................................................................... 4 PART 5. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED ................................................................................................. 5 PART 6. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................... 6 PART 7. INSURANCE ............................................................................................................................. 7 PART 8. ACTIVATION OF SERVICES .................................................................................................... 8 PART 9. REPORTING ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Pilot and Passenger Protection Act 3 O.S
    Aircraft Pilot and Passenger Protection Act 3 O.S. § 120.1 – 120.14 SECTION 120.1 A. This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Aircraft Pilot and Passenger Protection Act”. B. It is the intent of this act to: 1. Regulate obstructions to air navigation that have the potential of endangering the lives and property of aircraft pilots and passengers and those that live or work in the vicinity of public-use airports; that may affect existing and future instrument approaches to a public-use airport; and that may reduce the size of areas available for the landing, takeoff and maneuvering of aircraft thus impairing the utility of a public-use airport and the public investment therein; 2. Regulate the use of land in close proximity to a public-use airport to ensure compatibility with aircraft operations; and 3. Provide specific powers and duties to the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the public so that the state may properly fulfill its duty to ensure that land use around a public-use airport is compatible with normal airport operations including the landing and takeoff of aircraft. C. All heights or surfaces set forth in this act are from the standards set forth in Subpart C of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77. D. Depending upon the type of survey used, an adjustment will be made in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration standards to the horizontal and vertical measurements of the proposed structure as follows: Survey Horizontal Survey Vertical Type Adjustment Type Adjustment 1 +20 ft (6 m) A +3 ft (1 m) 2 +50 ft (15 m) B +10 ft (3 m) 3 +100 ft (30 m) C +20 ft (6 m) 4 +250 ft (75 m) D +50 ft (15 m) 5 +500 ft (150 m) E +125 ft (38 m) If the survey type (horizontal and vertical) is not certified by a licensed engineer or a licensed surveyor, a horizontal adjustment of plus or minus two hundred fifty (250) feet and a vertical adjustment of fifty (50) feet will be applied to the structure measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • A Clean Slate Airbus Pivots to Hydrogen For
    November 2020 HOW NOT TO DEVELOP DEVELOP TO NOT HOW FIGHTERYOUR OWN SPACE THREATS SPACE AIR GETSCARGO LIFT A A CLEAN SLATE AIRBUS HYDROGEN TO PIVOTS FOR ZERO-CARBON ‘MOONSHOT’ www.aerosociety.com AEROSPACE November 2020 Volume 47 Number 11 Royal Aeronautical Society 11–15 & 19–21 JANUARY 2021 | ONLINE REIMAGINED The 2021 AIAA SciTech Forum, the world’s largest event for aerospace research and development, will be a comprehensive virtual experience spread over eight days. More than 2,500 papers will be presented across 50 technical areas including fluid dynamics; applied aerodynamics; guidance, navigation, and control; and structural dynamics. The high-level sessions will explore how the diversification of teams, industry sectors, technologies, design cycles, and perspectives can all be leveraged toward innovation. Hear from high-profile industry leaders including: Eileen Drake, CEO, Aerojet Rocketdyne Richard French, Director, Business Development and Strategy, Space Systems, Rocket Lab Jaiwon Shin, Executive Vice President, Urban Air Mobility Division, Hyundai Steven Walker, Vice President and CTO, Lockheed Martin Corporation Join fellow innovators in a shared mission of collaboration and discovery. SPONSORS: As of October 2020 REGISTER NOW aiaa.org/2021SciTech SciTech_Nov_AEROSPACE PRESS.indd 1 16/10/2020 14:03 Volume 47 Number 11 November 2020 EDITORIAL Contents Drone wars are here Regulars 4 Radome 12 Transmission What happens when ‘precision effects’ from the air are available to everyone? The latest aviation and Your letters, emails, tweets aeronautical intelligence, and social media feedback. Nagorno-Karabakh is now the latest conflict where a new way of remote analysis and comment. war is evolving with cheap persistent UAVs, micro-munitions and loitering 58 The Last Word anti-radar drones, striking tanks, vehicles, artillery pieces and even SAM 11 Pushing the Envelope Keith Hayward considers sites with lethal precision.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Push-Back Prediction and Turnaround Monitoring by Vision-Based Object Detection and Activity Identification
    Aircraft Push-back Prediction and Turnaround Monitoring by Vision-based Object Detection and Activity Identification Thai Van Phat∗, Sameer Alam∗, Nimrod Lilith∗, Phu N. Tran† and Binh T. Nguyen‡ ∗Saab-NTU Joint Lab, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore †Air Traffic Management Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore ‡AISIA Research Lab, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Abstract—An accurate prediction of aircraft readiness for departure can help Air Traffic Control (ATC) plan an optimal pre-departure sequence at which aircraft are dispatched from the parking stands. This dynamic mechanism between predicting when all ground handling activities end (Target Off Block Time) and the pre-departure sequencing (Target Start-up Approval time) is the core of Airport Collaborative Decision Making. This turnaround process consists of several activities (fueling, board- ing/deboarding, loading/unloading, etc.) and involves several ground support types of equipment and vehicles. In this research, we propose a visual-analytic approach for detection, tracking such activities to predict the Target Off Block Time (push-back time). This research introduces a Convolutional Neural Networks based video-analytic framework that can monitor the aircraft turnaround processes, including object detection, object tracking, activity detection, and push-back prediction. It recognizes an aircraft type and retrieves turnaround process/activities from its Aircraft Performance Manual and then detects and tracks various activities to estimate their completion time with high accuracy. Live Gate Cam video data was collected from the Gate 3 at Tokachi-Obihiro airport, in Hokkaido, Japan. We used 16 videos with the corresponding lengths varying from 40 to 60 minutes for training and five videos for testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Report A-045/2011 Location Flight Data Report Crew
    REPORT A-045/2011 DATA SUMMARY LOCATION Date and time Saturday, 12 November 2011, at 11:12 local time1 Site Andratx, wooded area in La Trapa (Balearic Islands) AIRCRAFT Registration G-WOOW Type and model HUGHES 369E Operator Private Engines Type and model ROLLS ROYCE 250-C20B Number 1 CREW Pilot in command Age 53 years old Licence Private Helicopter Pilot (PPL(H)) Total flight hours 110 h Flight hours on the type 40 h INJURIES Fatal Serious Minor/None Crew 1 Passengers 1 Third persons DAMAGE Aircraft Destroyed Third parties 450 m2 of low lands and shrubs FLIGHT DATA Operation General aviation – Private Phase of flight Low level maneuvering – Flight REPORT Date of approval 28 November 2012 1 All times in this report are local unless otherwise specified. To obtain UTC subtract one hour from local time. 133 Report A-045/2011 Addenda Bulletin 5/2012 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1. History of the flight On Saturday, 12 November 2011, a Hughes 369E aircraft, registration G-WOOW, took off from the Son Bonet Airport (Balearic Islands) at approximately 10:40 on a private flight with two persons onboard. The flight plan filed indicated the flight was to last 1 hour and 15 minutes. The destination was the same departure airport and the aircraft had enough fuel to last 2 hours and 40 minutes. The aircraft’s two occupants were the pilot, who flew this aircraft frequently due to his friendship with its owner, and a passenger, who was sitting in the free front seat next to the pilot’s and who had been friends with the pilot for about 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Guidelines for Accessible Lavatories in Twin Aisle Aircraft
    February5, 1992 SUGGESTED GUIDELINES For ACCESSIBLE LAVATORIES IN TWIN AISLE AIRCRAFf i ,-)· .·) ·· J Prepared By Ad Hoc Working Group on Design Guidelines ' J ..· February 5, 1992 This document is the product of a special ad hoc working group formed by airframe manufacturers, airlines, and disability advocacy groups and representatives from federal agencies. It is maintained administratively, on behalf of the ad hoc working group participants, by the Air Transport Association of America as ATA Document 91-XX. Copies may be obtained by contacting ATA at the address listed below. Changes to the document are controlled and approved by the ad hoc working group. All of these groups are listed in Appendix A. Copies of this document may be obtained by contacting the Air Transport Association of America, 1709 New York Avenue, Northwest, Washington, D.C. 20006, Attention: Specification Orders. Phone: (202) 626· 4050, Fax: (202) 626-4149. ! ' !:" f. I J February 5, 1992 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. THE PURPOSE OF THE SUGGESTED GUIDELINES A Why the Guidelines Were Created B. Application of the Guidelines C. Scope and Organizationthe of Guidelines II. AD HOC WORKING l GROUP BACKGROUND The Role the Ad Working Group L A of Hoc B. How the Suggested Guidelines Were Developed TECHNICAL PROVISIONS I. DEFINITION OF TERMS f) II. HUMAN & ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS A Physical Characteristics of Users B. Aircraft Operating Environment III. GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN FEATURES A General Criteria B. Lavatory C. Enclosure Features D. Assistive Equipment E. Call Light ' , ' ) F. Toilet Flush Control G. Sink & Amenities H. Signage I. Audible Warnings IV. EQUIVALENT FACILITATION � J./ l February5, 1992 APPENDIX A: Members of the Ad Hoc Working Group APPENDIX B: Report: "Functional Categories of Persons with Disabilities and OperationalDimensions for DesigningAccessible AircraftLavatories," Easter Seal Prepared for Paralyzed Veterans of America, National Society, National Multiple Sclerosis Society and United Cerebal Palsy Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Airline Competition Plan Update
    2004 AIRLINE COMPETITION PLAN UPDATE Submitted for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport On behalf of the Metropolitan Airports Commission February 22, 2004 INTRODUCTION Under the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, or “AIR- 21”, large and medium hub airports that meet a certain threshold of concentration are required to submit competition plans. The Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (“MSP” or “Airport”) meets the standards set out in AIR-21, as it is a large hub airport with more than 50% of its traffic served by a single carrier, Northwest Airlines. In 2001, MAC filed an update to its 2000 Airline Competition Plan to present its ongoing efforts to expand airport facilities necessary for vibrant competition and to secure competitive air service in its major markets. The efforts described in the 2001 Update largely represented MSP market conditions and efforts prior to September 11, 2001. The purpose of the 2004 Update will be to provide information pertaining to post September 11 market conditions at MSP as well as MSP’s post September 11 efforts to foster competition. Therefore, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) hereby submits this update to the 2000 Airline Competition Plan and 2001 Update. I. AVAILABILITY OF GATES AND RELATED FACILITIES A. Number and identity of any air carriers that have begun providing or stopped service In December 2001, locally based Sun Country Airlines ceased operations after nearly 20 years of successful operations at MSP. The effects of a slumping economy and September 11 took a significant toll on Sun Country’s ability to sustain operations and essentially forced the carrier into Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING and HUMAN FACTORS a Comparative Study of the Perceptions by Ramp Staff and Management
    NLR-CR-2010-125 Executive summary AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING AND HUMAN FACTORS A comparative study of the perceptions by ramp staff and management Problem area were sent to the target groups Human factors have been Management and Operational Report no. identified by the European personnel and interviews were NLR-CR-2010-125 Commercial Aviation Safety conducted afterwards to verify Team as a ground safety issue the results and to place them in Author(s) for which safety enhancement the right context. A.D. Balk J.W. Bossenbroek action plans have to be developed. Results and conclusions Report classification The results identified UNCLASSIFIED The objective of this study is to opportunities for improvement investigate the causal factors in the propagation of the safety Date which lead to human errors policy and principles, April 2010 during the ground handling substantiation of the principles process and create unsafe of a just culture, communication Knowledge area(s) situations, personal accidents or of safety related issues, the Vliegveiligheid (safety & incidents. ‘visibility’ of management to security) operational personnel, This document describes the standardisation of phraseology Descriptor(s) Human factors results of the study, performed on the ramp and awareness of Safety culture the potential risks of human by the Air Transport Safety Ground handling Institute of the National factors like time pressure, Aerospace Laboratory NLR in stress, fatigue and cooperation with the Civil communication. Aviation Authority of the Netherlands. Applicability The results of this study are Description of work considered applicable to all The study has been performed European ground service by investigating safety culture providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Apron Lighting Musco’S Industry-Leading Total Light Control — TLC for LED® Technology Leading the Way in Apron Lighting
    Airport Apron Lighting Musco’s Industry-Leading Total Light Control — TLC for LED® Technology Leading the Way in Apron Lighting There’s a lot to consider with airport apron lighting. Will glare affect pilots or air traffic controllers? What about maintenance? Will it improve operations? Is it energy efficient? As the use of LED continues to emerge, it’s important to understand that different LED lighting produces vastly different results. Musco has applied its more than 40 years of research and experience to take advantage of the LED light source in ways no other manufacturer can. The result is an LED system that’s created new possibilities for airport lighting. Improved Visibility TOTAL LIGHT CONTROL — PRIOR HPS LIGHT SOURCE Custom optics provide greater light uniformity, TLC FOR LED® improving visibility and efficiency of ground crews. Reduced Glare Patented glare reduction technology eliminates glare from impacting pilots and air traffic controllers. Total Light Control Superior light control preserves darkness in areas where light isn’t intended. Camera settings for both photos 1s at f/4, ISO 100, WB 4300 Streamlined Maintenance Remote electrical enclosures eliminate the need for lifts to service and removes weight from the poletop. Longer Reliability System solution with lighting, electrical, and structural components designed to work together for long-term reliability. System Adaptability Interfaces with new or existing facility management systems, along with adaptive controls based on gate usage. No Maintenance Costs A comprehensive 10-year parts and labor warranty eliminates maintenance costs and headaches for the next decade. An Ideal New or Retrofit Foundation to Poletop Solution Retrofit Solution Light-Structure System™ System Solution Whether installed as a retrofit or foundation to poletop solution, Musco’s LED apron system is factory aimed, wired, and tested for easy installation and trouble-free operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reno – Stead Airport
    Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority FY 2017-18 ANNUAL BUDGET Table of Contents SECTION 1 – Introduction and Summary Airport System Overview. ......................................................................................... 1-2 National and Regional Economic Outlook. ............................................................. 2-13 Air Service Market Update. ................................................................................... 13-17 Air Cargo Update. .................................................................................................. 17-19 Operating Environment. ........................................................................................ 19-29 Budget Process. ..................................................................................................... 29-30 Revenue Bond Resolution .......................................................................................... 30 Planning for the Future .......................................................................................... 30-32 Budget Document Structure ....................................................................................... 32 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 32-33 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 33 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................. 34 SECTION 2 – Executive Summary
    [Show full text]