2020 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 305(B) and 303(D) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 305(B) and 303(D) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report 2020 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 305(b) and 303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report Photo: Scott Eck - Bid Islad i Saipas Northeastern Coastal waters Bureau of Environmental and Coastal Quality December 2020 Editor & Contributing Author: Kathy Yuknavage Contributing Authors: Jonathan Arriola, David Benavente, Rodney Camacho, Erin Derrington, Malcolm Johnson, Larry Maurin, Denise Perez, and Travis Spaeth Maps: Rodney Camacho, Robbie Greene, and Kathy Yuknavage CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 PART A. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 PART B. BACKGROUND INFORMATION………………………………………………………………………………. 14 B.1. ALL CNMI SURFACE WATERS .......................................................................................... 14 B.1.1. Monitoring Water Quality of Saipan and Mañagaha …………………………………………. 16 B.1.2. Monitoring Water Quality of Rota and Tinian …………………………………………………… 16 B.1.3. Monitoring Water Quality of Northern Islands …………………………………………………. 17 B.1.4. CNMI Classification of Marine Coastal Water Uses …………………………………………… 17 B.1.4.1. Class AA Coastal Waterbodies ………………………………………………………………………………. 17 B.1.4.2. Class A Coastal Waterbodies ………………………………………………………………………………… 20 B.1.5. CNMI Classification of Fresh Surface Waterbodies (Streams, Wetlands and Lakes) Uses ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 B.2. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM ..................................................................... 25 B.2.1. Water Quality Surveillance/Nonpoint Source Program ……………………………………… 25 B.2.1.1. CNMI Water Quality Standards …………………………………………………………………………….. 25 B.2.1.2. Water Quality Monitoring and Notification ………………………………………………………….. 26 B.2.1.3. Section 401 Water Quality Certification Program …………………………………………………. 27 B.2.2. Marine Biological Monitoring Program …………………………………………………………….. 27 B.2.3. Wastewater, Earthmoving, and Erosion Control Program …………………………………. 28 B.2.3.1. Wastewater Treatment Disposal Regulations ……………………………………………………….. 28 B.2.3.2. Earthmoving and Erosion Control Regulations ……………………………………………………… 29 B.2.4. Safe Drinking Water and Ground water Management Program ……………………….. 30 B.2.4.1. Safe Drinking Water Regulations ………………………………………………………………………….. 30 B.2.4.2. Well Drilling and Well Operation Regulations ……………………………………………………….. 30 B.2.4.3. Underground Injection Control Regulations …………………………………………………………. 30 B.3. COST/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 30 B.3.1. Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 B.3.2. Benefits …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 31 B.4. SPECIAL STATE CONCERNS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. 32 B.4.1. Erosion and Sedimentation ………………………………………………………………………………. 32 B.4.2. Failing Septic Systems, and Illicit, and Permitted Wastewater Discharges ………… 33 B.4.3. Feral and Domesticated Animal Fecal Contamination ………………………………………. 36 B.4.4. Toxins and Heavy Metal Contamination of Fish and Other Biota ………………………. 36 B.4.5. Climate Related Severe Storm Event Impacts …………………………………………………… 37 PART C. SURFACE WATER MONITORING ASSESSMENT ……………………………………………………… 38 C.1. MONITORING PROGRAMS ............................................................................................. 38 C.1.1. Coastal Marine Water Quality Monitoring and Notification ……………………………… 39 C.1.2. Marine Biological Criteria Monitoring Program ………………………………………………… 40 C.1.3. Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program ……………………………………………………… 41 C.1.4. Other Outside Information and Data Used for Assessment Purposes ……………….. 41 C.1.4.1. WERI Fish Tissue and Biota Contaminant Studies …………………………………………………. 41 C.1.4.2. UOG and NOAA-CRED Studies ………………………………………………………………………………. 42 C.1.4.3. qPCR-MST Study of Saipan Coastal Waters …………………………………………………………… 43 C.1.4.4. LaoLao Bay Watershed Restoration Project ………………………………………………………….. 43 C.1.4.5. CNMI Division of Fish & Wildlife Fresh Aquatic Survey …………………………………………. 44 C.2. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 44 C.2.1. Waterbody Segmentation - Watershed Approach ……………………………………………. 44 C.2.2. CNMI Designated Uses ……………………………………………………………………………………… 47 C.2.3. Citeia Used to Assess Coastal Maie Wateodies Desigated Uses ……………. 50 C.2.3.1. Coastal Marine Waters Propagation of Aquatic Life Criteria …………………………………. 51 C.2.3.2. Coastal Marine Water Fish and Shellfish Consumption Criteria ……………………………. 55 C.2.3.3. Coastal Marine Waters Recreational Use Criteria …………………………………………………. 55 C.2.3.4. Coastal Marine Waters Aesthetic Enjoyment and Other Uses Criteria ………………….. 56 C.2.4 Criteria Used to Assess Fresh Surface Waterbodies Desigated Uses ………………. 60 C.2.4.1. Fresh Surface Water Propagation of Aquatic Life Criteria …………………………………….. 61 C.2.4.2. Fresh Surface Water Fish/Shellfish Consumption Criteria …………………………………….. 62 C.2.4.3. Fresh Surface Water Recreational Use Criteria …………………………………………………….. 62 C.2.4.4. Potable Freshwater Supply Criteria ………………………………………………………………………. 63 C.2.4.5. Fresh Surface Water Aesthetic Enjoyment and Other Uses Criteria ………………………. 63 C.2.5. Five-Part Consolidated Assessment and Listing Method Categories …………………. 63 C.2.5.1. CALM Category 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 64 C.2.5.2. CALM Category 2 ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 64 C.2.5.3. CALM Category 3 ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 65 C.2.5.4. CALM Category 4 ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 65 C.2.5.5. CALM Category 5 ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 66 C.3 ASSESSMENT RESULTS ................................................................................................... 67 C.3.1. Five-Part Categorization All CNMI Surface Waters ……………………………………………. 67 C.3.2. Section 303(d) List and TMDL Development Status …………………………………………… 67 C.3.2.1. Criteria for Removal of Water Segment/Pollutant Combinations from the 303(d) List …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 75 C.3.2.2. CNMI Waters Removed from the 303(d) List ………………………………………………………… 76 C.3.3. CNMI Summaries of Designated Use Support …………………………………………………… 81 C.3.4. Section 314 (Clean Lakes Program) …………………………………………………………………… 89 C.3.5. Five-Pat Categoizatio of Saipas ad Mañagahas Sufae Wates ……………… 93 C.3.5.1. KALABERA - Waterbody Segment 12 …………………………………………………………………… 100 C.3.5.2. TALOFOFO - Waterbody Segment 13 ………………………………………………………………….. 103 C.3.5.3. KAGMAN - Waterbody Segment 14 …………………………………………………………………….. 107 C.3.5.4. LAOLAO - Waterbody Segment 15 ………………………………………………………………………. 111 C.3.5.5. DANDAN - Waterbody Segment 16 …………………………………………………………………….. 114 C.3.5.6. ISLEY - Waterbody Segments 17A and 17B …………………………………………………………. 116 C-3.5.7. SUSUPE - Waterbody Segment 18 ………………………………………………………………………. 124 C.3.5.8. WEST TAKPOCHAU – Waterbody Segments 19A, 19B, and 19C ………………………….. 136 C.3.5.9. ACHUGAO - Waterbody Segments 20A and 20B …………………………………………………. 148 C.3.5.10. AS MATUIS – Waterbody Segment 21 …………………………………………………………………. 155 C.3.5.11. BANADERU – Waterbody Segment 22 ………………………………………………………………… 158 C.3.5.12. MAÑAGAHA - Waterbody Segment 23 ……………………………………………………………….. 161 C.3.6. Five-Pat Categoizatio of Rotas Sufae Wates ………………………………………….. 162 C.3.6.1. DUGI/GAMPAPA/CHENCHON – Waterbody Segment 1 ………………………………………. 168 C.3.6.2. SABANA/TALAKHAYA/PALIE – Waterbody Segment 2 …………………………………………. 170 C.3.6.3. SONGSONG – Waterbody Segment 3 ………………………………………………………………….. 173 C.3.6.4. UYULANHULO/TETETO – Waterbody Segment 4 …………………………………………………. 175 C.3.6.5. CHALIAT/TALO – Waterbody Segment 5 ……………………………………………………………… 177 C.3.7. Five-Pat Categoizatio of Tiias Sufae Wates ……………………………………….. 179 C.3.7.1. AGUIGAN – Waterbody Segment 6 …………………………………………………………………….. 185 C.3.7.2. MASALOK – Waterbody Segment 7 …………………………………………………………………….. 186 C.3.7.3. CAROLINAS – Waterbody Segment 8 ………………………………………………………………….. 188 C.3.7.4. MAKPO – Waterbody Segments 9 and 9H …………………………………………………………… 190 C.3.7.5. PUNTAN/DIAPLOLAMANIBOT – Waterbody Segment 10 ……………………………………. 195 C.3.7.6. PUNTAN/TAHGONG – Waterbody Segment 11 …………………………………………………… 197 C.3.8. Five-Pat Categoizatio of the Nothe Islads Sufae Wates ………………….. 200 C.3.8.1. FARALLON DE PAJAROS – Waterbody Segment 33 …………………………………………….. 206 C.3.8.2. MAUG – Waterbody Segment 32 ……………………………………………………………………….. 208 C.3.8.3. ASUNCION – Waterbody Segment 31 …………………………………………………………………. 211 C.3.8.4. AGRIHAN – Waterbody Segment 30 …………………………………………………………………… 213 C.3.8.5. PAGAN – Waterbody Segment 29 ………………………………………………………………………. 215 C.3.8.6. ALAMAGAN – Waterbody Segment 28 ……………………………………………………………….. 222 C.3.8.7. GUGUAN – Waterbody Segment 27 ……………………………………………………………………. 225 C.3.8.8. SARIGAN – Waterbody Segment 26 ……………………………………………………………………. 227 C.3.8.9. ANATAHAN – Waterbody Segment 25 ……………………………………………………………….. 229 C.3.8.10. FARALLON DE MEDINILLA – Waterbody Segment 24 ………………………………………….. 234 C.4. WETLANDS PROGRAM ................................................................................................. 238 C.5. TREND ANALYSIS FOR SURFACE WATERS .................................................................... 243 C.6. PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUES ................................................................................................ 243 C.6.1. Beach Water Quality Issues …………………………………………………………………………….. 243 C.6.2. Public Water Supply/Drinking Water Use Issues ……………………………………………… 245 PART D. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT ……………………………………………. 246
Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory
    Form No. 10-300 Ul^l mu^l Alta ucr/VKl ivicix i wr i nc, UN i E.IMWIV NATIONAL PARK SERVICE '•SS'^:?!®.^ s$lliil®'^^^:'s^ :^:'!i^'-'-^'®'':^:^w^ NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1 ^^i^isiii^^|:^^i^§iilP:S-illi Hill INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM 1 iiPiiPii^i^iiii xisJiSSg:; SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS [NAME HISTORIC Suicide Cliff ANO/OR COMMON .NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Saipan,/1^7 OF STATE Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands 969^8UNTY CODE CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE D I STRICT —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM BUILDING!S) PRIVATE ^.UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL JXPARK STRUCTURE BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC BEING CONSIDERED —*YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY _OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands STREET & NUMBER Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands - Headquarters CITY, TOWN STATE TTPI 96950 VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC. Attorney General, Office of the High Commissioner STREET & NUMBER Saipan Island CITY, TOWN STATE Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands 96950 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Micronesian Parks, DATE July, 1972 XL-FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS U.S Department of the Interior, Hawaii Group, National Park Service CITY. TOWN STATE 667 Ala Moana Boulevard, suite 512, Honolulu, Hawaii 96950 DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE ^.EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X.ORIGINALSITE _GOOD —RUINS FALTERED —MOVED DATE. —FAIR _UNEXPOSED Suicide Cliff is a section of the Banadero cliff line.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis of Twin Tropical Cyclones As Revealed by a Global Mesoscale
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 117, D13114, doi:10.1029/2012JD017450, 2012 Genesis of twin tropical cyclones as revealed by a global mesoscale model: The role of mixed Rossby gravity waves Bo-Wen Shen,1,2 Wei-Kuo Tao,2 Yuh-Lang Lin,3 and Arlene Laing4 Received 12 January 2012; revised 26 April 2012; accepted 29 May 2012; published 12 July 2012. [1] In this study, it is proposed that twin tropical cyclones (TCs), Kesiny and 01A, in May 2002 formed in association with the scale interactions of three gyres that appeared as a convectively coupled mixed Rossby gravity (ccMRG) wave during an active phase of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO). This is shown by analyzing observational data, including NCEP reanalysis data and METEOSAT 7 IR satellite imagery, and performing numerical simulations using a global mesoscale model. A 10-day control run is initialized at 0000 UTC 1 May 2002 with grid-scale condensation but no sub-grid cumulus parameterizations. The ccMRG wave was identified as encompassing two developing and one non-developing gyres, the first two of which intensified and evolved into the twin TCs. The control run is able to reproduce the evolution of the ccMRG wave and thus the formation of the twin TCs about two and five days in advance as well as their subsequent intensity evolution and movement within an 8–10 day period. Five additional 10-day sensitivity experiments with different model configurations are conducted to help understand the interaction of the three gyres, leading to the formation of the TCs. These experiments
    [Show full text]
  • February 2020 Ajet
    AJET News & Events, Arts & Culture, Lifestyle, Community FEBRUARY 2020 Riding the Jiu-Jitsu Wave Working for the Kyoryokutai The Changing Colors of the Red and White Singing Battle Journey Through Magic Embarrassing Adventures of an Expat in Tokyo The Japanese Lifestyle & Culture Magazine Written by the International Community in Japan1 In response to ongoing global news, the team at Connect Magazine would like to acknowledge the devastating impact of the 2019-2020 bushfires in Australia. Our thoughts and support are with those suffering. 2 Since September 2019, the raging fires across the eastern and southeastern Australian coastal regions have burned over 17.9 million acres, destroyed over 2000 homes, and killed least 27 people. A billion animals have been caught in the fires, with some species now pushed to the brink of extinction. Skies are reddened from air heavy with smoke— smoke which can be seen 2,000km away in New Zealand and even from Chile, South America, which is more than 11,000km away. Currently, massive efforts are being taken to tackle the bushfires and protect people, animals, and homes in the vicinity. If you would like to be a part of this effort, here are some resources you can use to help: Country Fire Authority Country Fire Service Foundation In Victoria In South Australia New South Wales Rural The Australian Red Cross Fire Service Fire recovery and relief fund World Wildlife Fund GIVIT Caring for injured wildlife and Donating items requested by habitat restoration those affected The Animal Rescue Collective Craft Guild Making bedding and bandaging for injured animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (Cnmi)
    WHO MIND Mental Health in Development WHO proMIND: Profiles on Mental Health in Development COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS Mental Health Policy and Service Development Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse World Health Organization WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data WHOproMIND: profiles on mental health in development: Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 1.Mental health. 2.Mental health services. 3.Health policy. 4.Micronesia. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 150574 1 (NLM classification: WM 140) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • America&Apos;S Unknown Avifauna: the Birds of the Mariana Islands
    ß ß that time have been the basis for con- America's unknown avifauna. siderable concern (Vincent, 1967) and indeed appear to be the basis for the the birds of inclusion of several Mariana birds in the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (1976) list of the Mariana Islands Endangered Species.These brief war- time observationswere important, but no significant investigationshave been conductedin the ensuingthirty yearsto "Probably no otherAmerican birds determine the extent to which the are aspoorly known as these." endemic avifauna of these islands may haverecovered. Importantly, no assess- mentshave been made of the impactof H. Douglas Pratt, Phillip L. Bruner the military's aerial planting of the exoticscrubby tree known as tangan- and Delwyn G. Berrett tangan, Leucaenaglauca, to promote revegetationafter the war. This 'treeis known as "koa haole" in Hawaii. restricted both in their time for bird ß ß announcesthe signthat greets observation and in their movements on v•sitors to Guam. Few Americans realize the islands. Their studies were made in authorsURING THEvisitedSUMMER the islandsOF1076the of that the nation's westernmost territories 1945 and 1946 when most of the Mari- Saipan,Tinian, Rota, and Guam, and m he across the International Date Line in anaswere just beginningto recoverfrom 1978 Bruner and Pratt returned to Sai- the far westernPacific. Guam, the larg- the ravagesof war (Baker, 1946).Never- pan and Guam. We havespent a total of est and southernmost of the Mariana theless, population estimates made at 38 man/dayson Saipan,four on Tinian, Islands,has been a United Statesposses- s•on since Spain surrendered her sov- & Agrihan ereigntyover the island at the end of the Sparash-AmericanWar.
    [Show full text]
  • Saipan Tribune Page 2 of 2
    Saipan Tribune Page 2 of 2 ,,," '."..,..US,." .Y """I,"', "...I,, -.-.A I., .I," -I...", .Y. ..,",. .'U""'J, I IYI""IIIIY."~I justified. The area is said to have vegetation and a small pond. The Navy's land use request was coursed through the Office of the Veterans Affairs. Story by Liberty Dones Contact this reporter http://www.saipantribune.com/newsstory.aspx?cat=l&newsID=27904 4/29/03 Marianas Variety On-Line Edition Page 1 of 1 Community biiilcls ties with sailors (DCCA) - Saipan’s reputation as a port of call for U.S. Navy ships is receiving a big boost thanks to a new program that’s building personal ties between island families and sailors. Under its new Sponsor-A-Service Member program, the Department of Community and Cultural Affairs put 18 visiting sailors from the USS Antietam in touch with a local family who voluntarily hosted them while the ship was in Saipan earlier this month. “I want to thank... everyone on your island paradise for making our visit ...on Saipan the best Port Call I’ve ever had - ever!” said Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, ship chaplain. “Your kindness and hospitality were like nothing we had ever experienced before.” Mite and other sailors were welcomed into the home of Noel and Rita Chargualaf, the first of Saipan residents to sign up for the program. “Every single man who participated has just raved about the wonderful time they had with the families,” said White. “You truly live in an island paradise and the people on your island are the nicest folks I have ever met.” “For the most, they were just thrilled to be around children and families.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Insurance Market 2020
    Japan’s Insurance Market 2020 Japan’s Insurance Market 2020 Contents Page To Our Clients Masaaki Matsunaga President and Chief Executive The Toa Reinsurance Company, Limited 1 1. The Risks of Increasingly Severe Typhoons How Can We Effectively Handle Typhoons? Hironori Fudeyasu, Ph.D. Professor Faculty of Education, Yokohama National University 2 2. Modeling the Insights from the 2018 and 2019 Climatological Perils in Japan Margaret Joseph Model Product Manager, RMS 14 3. Life Insurance Underwriting Trends in Japan Naoyuki Tsukada, FALU, FUWJ Chief Underwriter, Manager, Underwriting Team, Life Underwriting & Planning Department The Toa Reinsurance Company, Limited 20 4. Trends in Japan’s Non-Life Insurance Industry Underwriting & Planning Department The Toa Reinsurance Company, Limited 25 5. Trends in Japan's Life Insurance Industry Life Underwriting & Planning Department The Toa Reinsurance Company, Limited 32 Company Overview 37 Supplemental Data: Results of Japanese Major Non-Life Insurance Companies for Fiscal 2019, Ended March 31, 2020 (Non-Consolidated Basis) 40 ©2020 The Toa Reinsurance Company, Limited. All rights reserved. The contents may be reproduced only with the written permission of The Toa Reinsurance Company, Limited. To Our Clients It gives me great pleasure to have the opportunity to welcome you to our brochure, ‘Japan’s Insurance Market 2020.’ It is encouraging to know that over the years our brochures have been well received even beyond our own industry’s boundaries as a source of useful, up-to-date information about Japan’s insurance market, as well as contributing to a wider interest in and understanding of our domestic market. During fiscal 2019, the year ended March 31, 2020, despite a moderate recovery trend in the first half, uncertainties concerning the world economy surged toward the end of the fiscal year, affected by the spread of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonisation of the Mariana Islands: New Evidence and Implications for Human Movements V 479
    1 New evidence and implications ' for human movements in the Western Pacific John L. Craib Archaeologist Introduction Within the last five years, archaeological investigations on Saipan, ?inian and Guam has changed our understanding of the early period of human occupation in the Mariana Islands (Figure l). This work has not only extended the antiquity of human presence in these islands, it has provided a more detailed sample of the cultural assemblage asso- ciated with this early settlement. While increasing our knowledge of the prehistory of the Marianas, these new data, at the same time, offer important implications for human movement in the western Pacific. This paper provides a brief overview of recent fin- dings and discusses possible origins of the founding population in the Marianas and the implications this has for general movement within the western Pacific. Early sites in the Mariana Islands Two sites on Saipan, Chalan Piao and Achugao, are now dated to between 3000- 3600 cal BP; the calibrated age range at Unai Chulu, on Tinian, straddles 3000 BP. The assemblage recovered from these three sites include finely made pottery, much of it red- 478 V Le Pacifique de 5000 A 2000 avant le present /The Pacific from 5000 to 2000 BP I Figure 1 Mariana Islands in the Western Pacific. J. L. CRAIB- Colonisation of the Mariana Islands: New evidence and implications for human movements V 479 slipped, with a small percentage of sherds exhibiting finely incised and stamped deco- rations. Also presents in these deposits are a variety of shell ornaments manufactured almost entirely from Conus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • View on KKMP This Morning
    Super Typhoon Yutu Relief & Recovery Update #4 POST-DECLARATION DAMAGE ASSESSMENT COMPLETED; RELIEF MANPOWER ON-ISLAND READY TO SUPPORT; FEEDER 1, PARTIAL 1 & 2 BACK ONLINE Release Date: October 29, 2018 On Sunday, October 28, 2018, CNMI Leadership and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a Post-Declaration Damage Assessment. Saipan, Tinian and Rota experienced very heavy rainfall and extremely high winds which caused damages to homes, businesses and critical infrastructure. Utility infrastructure on all three islands has been visibly severely impacted to include downed power lines, transformers and poles. Driving conditions remain hazardous as debris removal operations are still underway. At the request of Governor Ralph DLG. Torres, representatives from FEMA Individual Assistance (IA) and the US Small Business Administration (SBA) joined the CNMI on an Aerial Preliminary Damage Assessment of Saipan, Tinian and Rota. Findings are as follows: SAIPAN: 317 Major; 462 Destroyed (T=779) Villages covered: Kagman 1, 2 & 3 and LauLau, Susupe, Chalan Kanoa, San Antonio, Koblerville, Dandan and San Vicente Power outage across the island 2-mile-long gas lines observed Extensive damage to critical infrastructure in southern Saipan Downed power poles and lines Page 1 of 8 Page printed at fema.gov/ja/press-release/20201016/super-typhoon-yutu-relief-recovery-update-4-post-declaration- 09/28/2021 damage TINIAN: 113 Major; 70 Destroyed (T=183) Villages covered: San Jose & House of Taga, Carolinas, Marpo Valley and Marpo Heights Power outage across the island; estimated to take 3 months to achieve 50% restoration Tinian Health Center sustained extensive damage Observed a downed communications tower ROTA: 38 Major; 13 Destroyed (T=51) Villages covered: Songsong Village and Sinapalo Power outage across the island Sustained the least amount of damage as compared to Saipan and Tinian Red Cross CNMI-wide assessments begin Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Holocene Human Expansion Into Near and Remote Oceania: a Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago
    The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology ISSN: 1556-4894 (Print) 1556-1828 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uica20 Late Holocene Human Expansion into Near and Remote Oceania: A Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago Timothy M. Rieth & J. Stephen Athens To cite this article: Timothy M. Rieth & J. Stephen Athens (2017): Late Holocene Human Expansion into Near and Remote Oceania: A Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago, The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, DOI: 10.1080/15564894.2017.1331939 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2017.1331939 View supplementary material Published online: 07 Jun 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uica20 Download by: [66.66.217.214] Date: 07 June 2017, At: 09:52 The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 0:1–12, 2017 Copyright C Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1556-4894 print / 1556-1828 online DOI: 10.1080/15564894.2017.1331939 Late Holocene Human Expansion into Near and Remote Oceania: A Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago Timothy M. Rieth and J. Stephen Athens International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ABSTRACT Since the investigations of Spoehr in the 1950s, most researchers have accepted a date of ∼3500 BP/1500 BC for the initial human settle- ment of the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) and Search and Rescue (SAR) Organizations in Taiwan
    CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT & HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE An Introduction to Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) and Search and Rescue (SAR) Organizations in Taiwan WWW.CFE-DMHA.ORG Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................2 Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) Organizations ..................................3 Search and Rescue (SAR) Organizations ..........................................................................18 Appendix A: Taiwan Foreign Disaster Relief Assistance ....................................................29 Appendix B: DOD/USINDOPACOM Disaster Relief in Taiwan ...........................................31 Appendix C: Taiwan Central Government Disaster Management Structure .......................34 An Introduction to Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) and Search and Rescue (SAR) Organizations in Taiwan 1 Introduction This information paper serves as an introduction to the major Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) and Search and Rescue (SAR) organizations in Taiwan and international organizations working with Taiwanese government organizations or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in HADR. The paper is divided into two parts: The first section focuses on major International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs), and local NGO partners, as well as international Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) working in HADR in Taiwan or having provided
    [Show full text]
  • Tinian: Not Just an Island in the Pacific
    TINIAN: NOT JUST AN ISLAND IN THE PACIFIC It is a small island, less than 40 square miles, a flat green dot in the vastness of Pacific blue. Fly over it and you notice a slash across its north end of uninhabited bush, a long thin line that looks like an overgrown dirt runway. If you didn't know what it was, you wouldn't give it a second glance out your airplane window. On the ground, you see the runway isn't dirt but tarmac and crushed limestone, abandoned with weeds sticking out of it. Yet this is arguably the most historical airstrip on earth. This is where World War II was won. This is Runway Able On July 24, 1944, 30,000 US Marines landed on the beaches of Tinian. Eight days later, over 8,000 of the 8,800 Japanese soldiers on the island were dead (vs. 328 Marines), and four months later the Seabees had built the busiest airfield of WWII - dubbed North Field – enabling B-29 Superfortresses to launch air attacks on the Philippines, Okinawa, and mainland Japan. Late in the afternoon of August 5, 1945, a B-29 was maneuvered over a bomb loading pit, then after lengthy preparations, taxied to the east end of North Field's main runway, Runway Able, and at 2:45am in the early morning darkness of August 6, took off. The B-29 was piloted by Col. Paul Tibbets of the US Army Air Force, who had named the plane after his mother, Enola Gay. The crew named the bomb they were carrying Little Boy.
    [Show full text]