East Line Corridor Profile and Recommendations Report: A Guide to Implementing Sustainable Communities Along the East Line

June 2014 About This Report East Corridor Working Group Members (in alphabetical order): • John Fernandez, City of Aurora – Comprehensive Planning This report documents existing conditions and planning efforts along • Steve Gordon, City & County of – Community Planning & the East Corridor as of December 2013. It also identifies opportunities Development and challenges to implementing the visions of these plans, and provides • Ismael Guerrero, Denver Housing Authority recommendations for achieving the vision and goals for sustainable, • Jenn Hillhouse, City & County of Denver – Public Works, Policy & Planning transit-oriented communities that the East Corridor Working Group • Tracy Huggins, Denver Urban Renewal Authority • Duane Launder, City of Aurora – Public Works collectively identified. • Huiliang Liu, City or Aurora – Comprehesive Planning • Craig Maraschky, Aurora Housing Authority This report was created as part of the corridor implementation activities • Gete Mekonnen, Northeast Denver Housing Center of the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Sustainable • Tom Reed, Denver International Airport Communities Initiative (SCI). In 2011, the Denver region was • Holli Riebel, Metro Denver EDC / Denver Metro Chamber awarded $4.5 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban • Angie Rivera-Malpiede, Stapleton Foundation Development (HUD) to support regional, corridor, and site-level planning • Jeanne Shreve, Adams County – Deputy County Administrator Unit and implementation activities. The SCI is supporting a consortium of • Mike Turner, Regional Transportation District municipalities, counties, state agencies, housing authorities, nonprofits, corporate interests, philanthropic and academic organizations working East Corridor Project Team (in alphabetical order): together to further enhance and implement Metro Vision, the region’s • Paul Aldretti, DRCOG long-range plan for growth and development, while addressing one • Catherine Cox Blair, Reconnecting America • Jocelyn Hittle, PlaceMatters of our region’s most pressing and exciting challenges: leveraging the • Ashley Kaade, DRCOG region’s multi-billion dollar expansion of the FasTracks transit system. • Mike Madrid, Reconnecting America • Flo Raitano, DRCOG Goals of the SCI: • Bill Sadler, Reconnecting America • Laura Sneeringer, CDR Associates • The consortium’s overarching goal is to align investments, programs and • Ken Snyder, PlaceMatters policies to maximize the benefits that result from the region’s investment in transit. We anticipate a region with: Report Authors: • Greater access to job opportunities across the entire income spectrum Reconnecting America (RA) is the primary author of this report. Staff that contributed to the report are: Catherine Cox Blair, Mike Madrid, Bill Sadler and • Lower combined transportation and housing costs Jeff Wood • Reduced consumption of fossil fuels and strain on natural resources • Development of mixed-use, pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly communities along transit lines that allow residents to easily access their daily needs without having to get into a car

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 2 Contents

Introduction 4

Demographic & Economic Characteristics 10

Review of Recent Station Area Planning Efforts 22

Opportunities and Challenges Assessment 43

Recommendations for Implementation 50

Appendix: Corridor Maps 56

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 3 Introduction

Introduction East Corridor, to create a summary report of existing conditions and opportunities and challenges and to implementing TOD. This document Commuter rail on the East Corridor presents an incredible opportunity provides recommendations to the East Corridor Working Group for moving for transit-oriented development (TOD) to leverage market momentum for from vision in the station area plans to reality in the corridor, including new investment and community building. A focus on TOD will support additional technical assistance needs that could be funded through the growth near new transit stations, enhance access to opportunity, connect SCI. workers to jobs and training, preserve and enhance the supply of a range of housing choices, reduce the combined costs of housing and transportation, Primary Audience and support walking and biking to stations. The communities along the corridor recognize this and have been planning for TOD along the corridor This report provides recommendations to the East Corridor Working Group for many years through station area plans, infrastructure studies and (ECWG) as it moves forward with implementation activities for transit- other processes. However, implementing TOD along the East Corridor is oriented development along the East Corridor. The primary audience not a quick or simple process. Partnerships are essential to making TOD is working group members and their respective agencies: the cities happen along the corridor. Fortunately, through funding from the Denver (Denver and Aurora), their housing authorities (Denver Housing Authority, Regional Council of Government’s (DRCOG) Sustainable Communities Aurora Housing Authority, Northeast Denver Housing Center, etc.), urban Initiative (SCI), a working group of public, nonprofit and private partners renewal authorities (Denver Urban Renewal Authority) and the Denver with vested interests in the East Corridor has been established. The East International Airport. The goal is for the ECWG to use the information, Corridor Working Group (ECWG) consists of the cities of Denver and analysis and recommendations contained in the report to strategically Aurora, Adams County, the Denver Housing Authority, Aurora Housing prioritize investments, funding sources, and development opportunities to Authority, RTD, Denver International Airport, the Stapleton Transportation benefit the East Corridor as a whole. The report also serves as evidence Management Association, and several other agencies (see page 2 for of the tremendous amount of work already done by the various agencies full list of participating agencies). The group recognizes the opportunity along the corridor to make TOD a reality along the East Corridor. for TOD and necessity of a corridor-wide partnership and is coalescing around the objective to create a TOD implementation strategy for the This report will also be a resource to: corridor. By laying the foundation now through activities such as adopting • The internal staffs at both cities (planning, economic development, appropriate policies, conducting studies of important issues and investing parks & recreation, etc.). in high value catalytic projects, the East Corridor Working Group can • The development and investment community, both private and ensure that over time, the corridor can achieve the visions and goals set nonprofit, looking to invest in station areas along the East Corridor. out in various community plans for the corridor. • The Regional Transportation District (RTD) and its Board of Directors. • The Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG). This Corridor Profile report provides a comprehensive summary of relevant • Potential government and foundation grantors. information and strategies for implementing successful TOD along the • Other cities, housing authorities, transit agencies, and regional East Corridor. Reconnecting America examined all station area plans governing bodies around the U.S. and other relevant studies along the corridor, as well as demographic, • Citizens of Denver and Aurora. economic and real estate conditions at each station and throughout the

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 4 Introduction

How to Use this Report Organization of the Report This report charts an initial course for the ECWG and the other “partners” This report is organized into the following sections: who will ultimately be responsible for implementing the station area plans and the additional goals identified by the ECWG itself. In these East Corridor Overview: A brief overview of the East Corridor and the transitional years when the corridor is still under construction and the Vision and Goals created by the East Corridor Working Group market is very much in flux, most of the TOD implementation activities will likely be undertaken by the public sector or community-based entities. Importance of Corridor Planning: A summary of the benefits of corridor But to the extent that developers are aware of and clearly understand how planning and how this report can help inform decisions made on the East this implementation strategy will be executed, this information will provide Corridor the certainty around which these private sector actors can begin to make their own investment decisions. Over time and as conditions change, this Reconnaissance Summary: An overview of demographics and economic strategy will need to be updated. Even with what could easily be a 30-year characteristics of the East Corridor and a review of station area and other process, there will always be a strong need for clear communication and relevant plans along the corridor, with accompanying maps. partnership among the public sector, community development entities, developers and the community. Opportunities and Challenges Assessment: A review of the opportunities and challenges to implementing TOD along the East Corridor, Because the East Corridor will provide a major connection between with information on each station area and corridorwide opportunities and downtown and the airport, this corridor is high-profile and will set the tone challenges. for TOD elsewhere in the region and around the country. Catalytic projects will be critical to ensuring the success of TOD on future transit corridors Corridorwide Recommendations for Implementation: A matrix of and could make or break interest from developers, employers, community recommendations for implementing TOD along the East Corridor, including members, and buyers in this type of development. The opportunities a priority list created by the East Corridor Working Group to select an for new development along the East Corridor are extremely varied, but activity to fund with SCI Technical Assistance funds. identifying the different building types that may be constructed along the corridor and how much new development is realistic are key steps in understanding how market momentum may be leveraged to create successful TOD.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 5 Introduction

About the East Rail Line Corridor The East Corridor is a 22.8-mile electric commuter rail line that will run from to Denver International Airport. The line is currently under construction and is expected to open in early 2016. There will be six stations between Union Station and the airport, for a total of eight stations.1 Station area plans have been completed or are underway for most of the stations.

Denver East Corridor: Basemap International Metropolitan Denver Region City and County Airport of Denver Legend Frequent Bus Service ! Existing Light Rail Future Fixed-Guideway Transit Optional Major Roads Future Station City of Denver Boundary

Half mile around stations National Wildlife Refuge 61st / Pena Adams County

Metropolitan Area Miles ! Regional Transit System Inset: Denver International Airport 036 Commerce City National Wildlife Refuge

87 36 City of Denver

! Airport / 40th Stapleton

6 INTERSTATE ! 70 ! ! ! ! 40th / Colorado 38th / Blake ! ! Union ! Station Central Park Peoria ! ! ! ! East 26th Ave !! ! Fitzsimons/Anschutz Aurora ! ! Medical Campus ! ! INTERSTATE ! 225 Colfax ! ! 40 ! [N

! Peoria St

East 8th Ave Monoco Blvd Mi 012 Figure 1: East Corridor Basemap The 61st Avenue/Peña Boulevard station was proposed by Denver after the East Line EIS. It has since been environmentally cleared and Denver has identified funding to move forward with the design and construction of the station. NOTE that several station names have changed since the creation of these maps: the Airport/40th station is now the 40th & Airport Blvd - Gateway Park station and Denver International Airport is known simply as Denver Airport. These changes have been reflected in the text of the document but not on the maps or data tables.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 6 Introduction

The East Corridor Vision & Goals The East Corridor Working Group has come up with the following vision • Provide access to jobs and promote accessible services such as statement and guiding principles for the East Corridor: education, family and health services, healthy food options, jobs, retail, recreation and entertainment attractions, and cultural amenities, The East Rail Line Corridor is a national model of a regional gateway, especially to areas where these community resources are missing. as it connects the unique, diverse neighborhoods of Denver and Aurora with the metro area and the world. The corridor stretches from Downtown • Develop regional destinations that build upon the history and culture Denver to Denver International Airport, with the commuter rail line of existing neighborhoods on the West end, while creating unique linking employment centers and neighborhoods with a range of housing places in new neighborhoods on the East end. opportunities, and diverse destinations. All stations are easy to access by multiple modes and the rail line provides access to goods and services to • Advocate for green building to support sustainable transit-oriented support sustainable transit-oriented communities. communities along the corridor.

Goals: Definining Transit-Oriented Development • Connect workers to existing and new employment centers and connect large employment centers to each other. The Center for Transit-Oriented Development (CTOD) defines transit- oriented development (TOD) as higher-density, mixed-use development • Leverage market momentum to create job opportunities. within walking distance—or a half-mile—of transit stations. These types of developments should: • Encourage capital improvements to promote economic development around the stations. • Increase “location efficiency” so people can walk and bike and take transit. • Improve connectivity to the stations to provide easy multi-modal access by walking, bicycling, transit and driving. • Boost transit ridership and minimize automobile traffic.

• Preserve and enhance a range of quality housing choices for new and • Provide a rich mix of housing, shopping and transportation choices. existing residents and neighborhoods throughout the corridor. • Generate revenue for the public and private sectors and provide value • Provide quality housing that is affordable for people who work at large for both new and existing residents. employment centers along the corridor, including Downtown Denver, Denver International Airport and the Anschutz/Fitzsimons Medical • Create a sense of place. Campus. • Connect residents and employers to job opportunities regionwide.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 7 Introduction

TOD is really about creating attractive, walkable, equitable and sustainable the East Corridor can help predict the market demand at other stations communities that allow residents to have housing and transportation along the corridor. choices and to live convenient, affordable, pleasant lives -- with places for our kids to play and for our parents to grow old comfortably. The excitement surrounding new transit investment presents an enormous opportunity to engage stakeholders. Presenting the corridor as one TOD is commonly cited as “transit-oriented development.” However, coherent opportunity to developers, despite the many jurisdictions and TOD along the East Corridor will not always entail new development, and station area plans, could make it easier to engage with them on where therefore planners and political leadership in the city have coined many different building types would be most appropriate. Indeed, the City different terms for the types of places that will help to achieve these goals: and County of Denver have already capitalized on this opportunity by Transit-Oriented Districts, Transit-Oriented Development, Sustainable coining the East Corridor a “Corridor of Opportunity” for business growth. Transit Communities, and Walkable Neighborhoods. All these terms refer Moreover, residents living near the East Corridor may understand the to the same fundamental set of objectives that can be achieved through implications of the transit investment on their community, but engaging integrated transit planning, development, urban design, streetscape them at the corridor scale can broaden their understanding of the benefits improvements, and reinvestment. that transit will provide not only to their own access to downtown, the airport and other destinations along the line, but the broader benefits of Why Do Corridor Scale Planning for TOD being connected to the regional rail network. Planning for TOD at the corridor level can create more efficient pathways The Cities of Denver and Aurora, as well as the housing authorities, to achieving the goals of TOD. Corridor planning can be more cost- urban renewal authorities, private developers and the airport, have done effective, as when multiple stations along a corridor face similar challenges excellent work in creating station-specific visions and development goals. and opportunities for TOD implementation. One example of a shared These plans are essential to pinpointing and planning for local hopes, challenge along the East Corridor is parking. Instead of doing separate values, fears, and concerns, but at the same time, accomplishing the parking studies, a coordinated plan for accommodating parking at each vision detailed in each of those plans simultaneously would be a costly and station area could help ensure that there is enough parking in the right overwhelming process. The Assessment portion of this report presents a places, identify where structured parking is most appropriate, and where path to achieving that vision. joint development opportunities are feasible near the station. Destination Connector The corridor is also the best scale to predict the long-range impacts of transit on the market for new development, on commuter travel behavior Like Denver’s West Corridor, the East Corridor is an example of a and on where the potential for displacement may be greatest. National “destination connector” corridor. Destination connector corridors research has shown that for new transit corridors, the private market does link residential neighborhoods to multiple activity centers, including not necessarily follow the supply of land. Instead, other factors, including employment, medical and commercial centers and academic campuses. the proximity of major employment centers, combine to determine which station areas may have the highest market demand. Knowing that Recent transit investments in destination corridors have resulted in Downtown Denver and the airport are the largest major job centers along consistently higher ridership than estimated, creating a “win” for transit

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 8 Introduction & Overview of the Project Purpose and Study Area agencies while building regional support for future transit investments. The next section provides a detailed overview of the population, Destination connector corridors encourage ridership in both directions at demographic and economic characteristics of the East Corridor station the same times of the day by linking to employment centers as well as areas in order to gain a better understand of who lives there and what other destinations. Some destination connector corridors also serve as types of jobs are available on the East Corridor. commuter corridors. The Hiawatha line in Minneapolis, for example, is a destination connector corridor that connects downtown at one end to the airport and Mall of America on the other end. Other examples include the Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor, which connects a series of job centers in Arlington County, Virginia, to Washington D.C.’s urban core; Phoenix’s light rail line, which connects the city’s downtown to Arizona State University; and Houston’s Red Line, which connects downtown Houston to the Medical Center and Rice University.

Broadly, the implications of this corridor type for TOD include: • The demand for new development will likely be highest in station areas identified as destinations, especially those that are walkable, higher- intensity, and well-connected to residential neighborhoods.2 • Destinations outside of downtowns have a stronger potential market for new development if they are centers that people want to visit regularly. • Auto-oriented job centers or malls along the corridor may require new pedestrian-oriented street and building design before they become truly transit accessible, even if they are physically near stations. • Walking and biking access to stations is important to encourage transit ridership, especially on the job end of the trip, where people are less inclined to walk long distances.3

Corridor planning is a critical component in leveraging investments in public transit and maximizing the potential for TOD success, but it cannot Figure 2: Destinations along the East Corridor be done without integrating both the regional context and station area planning.

2 Center for Transit-Oriented Development. (2010). Rails to Real Estate: Development Patterns Along Three Recently Constructed Transit Lines. 3 Cervero, Lund, Wilson 2004

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 9 Demographic & Economic Characteristics This summary provides detailed information on the demographic and economic characteristics of those living and working along the East Rail Line. This data comes from the National TOD Database, which provides demographic and economic information for every existing and proposed fixed guideway transit station in the U.S. as of 2011.4 A “station area” is defined as the half-mile radius surrounding the transit station. The “East Line Transit Shed” is the sum of all seven transit stations for which data is available.5

Population Characteristics

Figure 4 on the next page displays a summary of demographic information for people living within a half-mile of East Rail Line station areas. There are a total of 13,253 people living within East Rail Line station areas today, with over half living in the Denver Union Station area. Over half of the population (56.3%) is White and over one-quarter is Hispanic (29.9%). The population is relatively young, with 68% under 40 and 20% under 18 years old. Educational attainment is low, with 41.5% of residents having just a high school diploma or less. One-third have a four-year college degree.

The median household income is $56,272, slightly lower than the regional average of $61,225 in 2010. About two-thirds of East Line residents are renters (64%) and one-third are homeowners (36%). The majority of residents commute to work by car (84.4%) but 4.8% use public transportation as their primary mode. The average number of Figure 3: Multifamily near Central Park Station vehicles per household is 1.53 and about 40% of households own one car or less. Average housing and transportation costs are 47.6% of their income, slightly higher than the 45% threshold considered affordable for the average American family according to the HUD Location Affordability Index (http://www.locationaffordability.info/)** **Note that because over half of the population on the East Line lives near Denver Union Station, some of the demographic characteristics are skewed toward the population living in that station area.

4 National TOD Database is available at: http://toddata.cnt.org/ 5 Data is not available for the 61st & Pena and 72nd & Himalaya stations. Population data is also not available for the DIA station as the station area has no residents living there.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 10 th

Station DIA & Pena & Blake Total Peoria st th Colorado 61 38 Central Park Airport & 40 Airport Union Station Aurora TotalsAurora East Rail Line Denver Totals

Population 13,253 6,842 2,892 1,706 645 969 199 0 0 1,168 12,085 Households 6,656 4,708 1,057 505 223 68 95 0 0 163 6,493 Race/Ethnicity

7.26% 3.38% 8.20% 15.06% 2.33% 17.85% 24.67% N/A N/A % African American 19.01% 6.12% % Asian 3.79% 5.89% 0.57% 0.81% 5.28% 2.98% 3.24% N/A N/A 3.02% 3.87% % Other 2.69% 2.62% 2.53% 2.50% 2.44% 3.69% 5.34% N/A N/A 4.04% 2.58% % White 56.33% 80.62% 25.48% 16.88% 84.96% 31.68% 34.55% N/A N/A 32.17% 58.66% % Hispanic 29.92% 7.47% 63.24% 64.77% 5.00% 43.76% 32.02% N/A N/A 41.76% 28.77% Age Dist. % Under 18 20.82% 2.49% 27.61% 34.47% 29.44% 6.68% 24.22% N/A N/A 9.67% 14.45% % 18-24 11.60% 13.28% 12.16% 10.26% 1.28% 19.04% 13.59% N/A N/A 18.11% 11.95% % 25-39 37.22% 42.10% 30.86% 27.75% 44.93% 45.20% 32.46% N/A N/A 43.03% 37.54% % 40-59 21.87% 23.61% 20.73% 19.15% 19.20% 24.10% 24.41% N/A N/A 24.15% 22.06% % Over 60 8.49% 18.52% 8.64% 8.36% 5.15% 4.97% 5.32% N/A N/A 5.03% 14.01%

Education Attained High school or less 41.47% 16.04% 59.65% 65.64% 7.45% 65.94% 37.53% N/A N/A 53.90% 33.03% Some college 26.03% 19.47% 18.16% 19.58% 15.95% 22.15% 42.05% N/A N/A 30.58% 18.89% Bachelor’s or more 32.51% 64.50% 22.19% 14.78% 76.61% 11.92% 20.42% N/A N/A 15.52% 48.09%

Household Income Med. HH Income $56,272 $62,512 $37,585 $35,286 $115,362 $52,282 $42,835 N/A N/A $47,559 $62,686 Less than $25,000 25.93% 22.62% 35.63% 28.02% 9.04% 33.82% 24.19% N/A N/A $25,000-$50,000 25.88% 15.57% 29.84% 38.39% 9.80% 10.93% 33.76% N/A N/A $50,000-$75,000 18.30% 15.00% 21.38% 14.53% 9.77% 25.45% 25.75% N/A N/A Over $75,000 29.89% 46.82% 13.15% 19.06% 71.38% 29.81% 16.30% N/A N/A Housing Tenure % Renters 36.00% 30.63% 42.13% 52.40% 4.10% 73.77% 13.85% N/A N/A 61.31% 63.56% % Homeowners 64.00% 69.37% 57.87% 47.60% 95.90% 26.23% 86.15% N/A N/A 38.69% 36.45% Commuting Auto 84.38% 70.51% 57.60% 75.67% 91.47% 81.97% 92.81% N/A N/A 91.49% 68.08% Transit 4.81% 7.49% 6.83% 12.38% 7.37% 2.68% 3.19% N/A N/A 3.63% 7.97% Walking 2.52% 13.58% 24.94% 4.28% 0.46% 1.63% 0.00% N/A N/A 1.54% 15.05% Biking 1.09% 1.04% 0.99% 1.96% 0.00% 1.20% 0.00% N/A N/A 0.40% 1.12% Vehicle Own East% 0-1 car Corridor HH 39.75%Profile50.78% Report74.95% June58.33% 201451.85% 33.93% 35.03% N/A N/A 50.64% 66.62% Avg. # vehicles/HH 1.53 1.1 1.34 1.7 1.67 2.03 1.27 N/A N/A 1.57 1.24 Average Block Size 13.4 4.7 6.8 6.3 15.9 13.8 24.1 N/A N/A H+T Costs 47.60% 44.20% 39.30% 42% 66.70% 43.80% 44.70% N/A N/A Figure 4: Demographic Table, SOURCE: 2000/2010 Census SF1 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Race & Ethnicity Characteristics Race/Ethnicity Distribution Along East Rail Line Figure 5 shows the race/ethnicity distribution by station while Figure 6 Asian Other displays the distribution along the East Rail Line. While just over half of 3% all residents are White (56%), the percentage White population varies 4% considerably across station areas. Some station areas are predominantly African American White (Denver Union Station and Central Park), while in others the White 7% population is in the minority (38th & Blake, 40th & Colorado, Peoria). The Hispanic population is largest in the 38th & Blake and 40th & Colorado stations.

Race/Ethnicity Distribution by Station Area 100%

90% Hispanic or Latino 80% 30% White Alone 56% 70%

60% Other 50% Asian African American 40% Hispanic or Latino 30% White Alone

20%

10% SOURCE: 2000/2010 Census SF1

0% Figure 6: Race/Ethnicity Distribution Along East Rail Line East Rail Denver 38th & 40th & Central Peoria Airport & Line Union Blake Colorado Park 40th Station SOURCE: 2000/2010 Census SF1 Figure 5: Race/Ethnicity Distribution by Station Area

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 12 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Age Distribution Age Distribution Along East Rail Line Figure 7 shows the age distribution by station area while Figure 8 shows the age distribution along the East Rail Line. The three Northeast Denver stations have the highest youth populations, with the 40th & Colorado station being the youngest. Denver Union Station has the highest percentage of 60+ residents over 60 years old. The Central Park and Peoria stations have 8% 0-17 the largest 25-39 population. 21%

40-59 22% Age Distribution by Station Area 100% 18-24 90% 12%

80%

70%

60% 60+ 50% 40-59

40% 25-39 25-39 18-24 37% 30% 0-17 20% SOURCE: 2000/2010 Census SF1 10% Figure 8: Age Distribution Along East Rail Line 0% East Rail Denver 38th & 40th & Central Park Peoria Airport & Line Union Blake Colorado 40th Station SOURCE: 2000/2010 Census SF1 Figure 7: Age Distribution by Station Area

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 13 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Educational Attainment Educational Attainment Along East Rail Line Figure 9 shows educational attainment by station area while Figure 10 shows educational attainment along the East Rail Line. Overall, about one- third of residents along the East Rail Line have a college degree, but the percentage varies considerably between station areas. The Denver Union Station and Central Park stations have large college-educated populations, while the 38th & Blake, 40th & Colorado, and Peoria stations have very small college-educated populations with large numbers of residents having a high school diploma or less. Bachelor's or higher Educational Attainment by Station Area 33% 100% High School or less 90% 41% 80%

70%

60%

50% Bachelor's or higher Some College 40% Some College High School or less 26% 30%

20% SOURCE: 2000 SF3/2005-2010 ACS 10%

0% East Rail Denver 38th & 40th & Central Peoria Airport & Line Union Blake Colorado Park 40th Figure 10: Educational Attainment Along East Rail Line Station SOURCE: 2000 SF3/2005-2010 ACS

Figure 9: Educational Attainment by Station Area

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 14 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Household Income

Figure 11 shows the income distribution by station area while Figure 12 The station area with the lowest median household income is just one shows the distribution along the East Rail Line. Income is broken down station to the west of Central Park—40th & Colorado, which has a median into four quartiles: less than $25,000 per year, between $25,000 and income of $35,286 and only 19% of residents within the highest income $50,000 per year, $50,000 to $75,000 per year and over $75,000 per year. bracket. Union Station is also a very high income station (46.8%) but the While overall, the income distribution across all four quartiles is evenly distribution is more evenly split. The 38th & Blake, Peoria, and Airport & split, some station areas vary considerably more than others. The Central 40th stations are low income stations like 40th & Colorado. Park station has the highest median income at $115,362, and the highest percentage of households earning $75,000 or higher (71.4%). Income Mix Along East Rail Line Income Mix by Station Area 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Greater than $75K Less than $25K 26% 50% 30% Greater than $75K 40% $50K-74,999 30% $25K-49,999 20% Less than $25K 10% 0% $50K-74,999 $25K-49,999 18% 26%

SOURCE: 2000 SF3/2007-2011 ACS Figure 11: Income Mix by Station Area

SOURCE: 2000 SF3/2007-2011 ACS Figure 12: Income Mix Along East Rail Line East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 15 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Housing Tenure Housing Mix Along East Rail Line Figure 13 shows the percentage of renters and owners in each station area while Figure 14 shows the percentage along the East Rail Line. Overall, about two-thirds of East Rail Line residents are renters, with higher percentage of renters in the Denver Union Station, 38th & Blake and Airport & 40th stations. The Central Park station has a very small % percentage of renters. Renter 36.20% Figure 15 shows the number of HUD Section 8 and Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) housing units in each station area. There are a total of 392 LIHTC and 824 Section 8 units along the East Rail Line, all of which % are near Denver Union Station. Owner Housing Mix by Station Area 63.80% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% SOURCE: 2000 SF1/2010 SF1 50% 40% Figure 14: Housing Mix Along the East Rail Line % Renter 30% % Owner HUD/LIHTC Housing Unit Database, 2013 20%

10% th &

0% Station th & Blake Total 40 th Colorado East Line Line East 38 Central Park Central Airport & 40 Denver Union Union Denver LIHTC Units 392 392 - - - - - Section 8 Units 824 676 148 - - - - SOURCE: 2000 SF1/2010 SF1 Figure 15: HUD/LIHTC Housing Unit Database, 2013 Figure 13: Housing Mix by Station Area

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 16 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Housing & Transportation Costs Figure 16 shows how combined housing & transportation costs vary by Most of the existing housing in the Central Park station area are for sale station area. Housing is considered affordable if, when combined with units targeted toward higher incomes, and most of the site is still vacant transportation costs, the total cost constitutes no more than 45% of land. The few existing residents in the area are mainly high income, thus monthly income. this station currently stands out from the rest.

The East Rail Line average is slightly above this threshold at 47.6%, but The Central Park Station Area Plan calls for several multifamily rental all station areas except for the Central Park station area fall below the apartment buildings in the station area, which will likely change the threshold. Housing & transportation costs make up 66% of household demographics as well as the housing + transportation costs once the budgets in that station area, though this is also the highest income station station area is built out. area. Housing & Transportation Costs as a % of Monthly Income Along East Rail Line 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% 90.0% 80.0% 80.0% 70.0% 70.0% 60.0% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% 40.0% 40.0% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% East Rail Line Denver Union 38th & Blake 40th & Colorado Central Park Peoria Airport & 40th Station

Average H+T Cost % of Income SOURCE: HTA Affordability Index Figure 16: Average Housing and Transportation Cost Percentage of Income East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 17 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Employment Characteristics th

Station & Blake & Pena DIA** Peoria Station th & Colorado & st th 38 Central Park 61

Figure 17 displays a breakdown of jobs by industry for each station along Airport 40 & Denver Union Denver 40 the East Rail Line. There are a total of 51,065 jobs along the East Line, East Line Total* Total Jobs, 2009 40,700 30,328 3,039 2,527 569 3,416 821 N/A 33,500 with the majority near Denver Union Station in Downtown Denver (59.3%). Production, Distribution & Repair 16.14% 7.53% 44.36% 48.52% 34.09% 38.23% 25.70% N/A N/A Another 20% of jobs are located at the airport. The Central Park station Retail 5.15% 2.31% 5.99% 19.63% 18.28% 10.30% 31.91% N/A N/A contains the smallest amount of jobs, though current plans call for a large Knowledge-Based 30.17% 37.50% 6.61% 5.26% 12.48% 10.60% 16.57% N/A N/A office park here so that will likely change in the future. Eds & Meds 15.20% 18.84% 4.18% 2.18% 8.44% 5.18% 7.67% N/A N/A Entertainment 11.27% 13.58% 3.22% 3.56% 9.14% 5.01% 6.94% N/A N/A Government 2.05% 2.53% 0.86% 0.04% 0.88% 1.02% 0.12% N/A N/A The East Line contains a diverse industry mix, with about one-quarter Other 20.02% 17.70% 34.78% 20.82% 16.70% 29.65% 11.08% N/A N/A of jobs falling into the Knowledge-Based sector and another one-quarter Jobs by Income Level being industrial jobs within the Production, Distribution & Repair sector. Less than $1,250/month 18.50% 19.00% 13.20% 15.70% 23.20% 14.60% 23.50% N/A N/A The largest number of jobs is in the Professional, Scientific & Technical $1,251-$3,333/month 32.00% 26.50% 38.80% 51.10% 51.50% 40.10% 46.30% N/A N/A More than $3,333/month 49.50% 54.50% 48.00% 33.20% 25.30% 45.30% 30.20% N/A N/A sector, followed by the Health Care & Social Assistance sector. Detailed Employment Breakdown Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 43 11.63% 27.91% 9.30% 2.33% 48.84% 0.00% N/A N/A Figure 18 on the following page display more information on the industry Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction) 1,202 56.66% 19.72% 10.57% 1.25% 11.23% 0.58% N/A N/A and sector breakdown of jobs along the East Line. Utilities 322 60.87% 13.66% 10.56% 1.55% 12.73% 0.62% N/A N/A Construction 2,281 28.67% 29.29% 12.23% 1.45% 27.62% 0.75% N/A N/A Manufacturing 2,833 26.33% 31.59% 16.52% 1.94% 22.77% 0.85% N/A N/A Wholesale Trade 2,093 41.04% 9.99% 19.45% 3.63% 19.45% 6.45% N/A N/A Retail Trade 2,096 33.49% 8.68% 23.66% 4.96% 16.70% 12.50% N/A N/A Transportation and Warehousing 1,645 41.22% 14.89% 21.40% 3.89% 15.44% 3.16% N/A N/A Information 1,977 91.25% 1.82% 1.42% 0.56% 3.59% 1.37% N/A N/A Finance and Insurance 3,063 91.77% 1.53% 1.14% 0.62% 3.69% 1.24% N/A N/A Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,195 91.97% 2.51% 1.34% 0.67% 2.59% 0.92% N/A N/A Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 4,859 93.81% 1.36% 0.84% 0.54% 2.43% 1.03% N/A N/A Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,184 93.07% 1.77% 1.18% 0.59% 2.53% 0.84% N/A N/A Admin & Supp., Waste Mgmt & Remed. Svcs 2,816 87.93% 2.45% 2.06% 0.99% 4.79% 1.78% N/A N/A Educational Services 1,740 94.20% 2.47% 0.63% 0.57% 1.61% 0.52% N/A N/A Health Care and Social Assistance 4,445 91.70% 1.89% 0.99% 0.85% 3.35% 1.21% N/A N/A Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 747 91.03% 1.74% 2.54% 0.80% 2.95% 0.94% N/A N/A Accommodation and Food Services 3,840 89.56% 2.21% 1.85% 1.20% 3.88% 1.30% N/A N/A Other Services (except Public Administration) 1,484 91.37% 1.75% 1.55% 0.88% 3.50% 0.94% N/A N/A Public Administration 835 91.86% 3.11% 0.12% 0.60% 4.19% 0.12% N/A N/A Figure 17: Employment Characteristics by Station Area SOURCE: 2012 LEHD LODES Data *All calculated percentages exclude 61st & Pena and DIA employment numbers **DIA Jobs Total Source: City and County of Denver, Department of Aviation, 2010

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 18 Total Jobs Along East Rail Line Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Health Care and Social Assistance Accommodation and Food Services Finance and Insurance Manufacturing Administrative and Support and Waste Management … Construction Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Information Educational Services Transportation and Warehousing Other Services (except Public Administration) Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction) Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Management of Companies and Enterprises Public Administration Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Utilities Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting

SOURCE: 2012 LEHD LODES Data 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Figure 18: Jobs by Industry on the East Line, all stations East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 19 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Employment Mix Employment Mix Along East Rail Line Figure 19 shows the employment mix by station area while Figure 20 Government shows the mix along the East Rail Line. Knowledge-based jobs make up 1.64% one-quarter of all jobs along the East Rail Line, but most of these jobs are located near Denver Union Station. Most other station areas have a tiny percentage of Knowledge-Based jobs. The predominant industry sector in Entertainment 9.52% most station areas is Production, Distribution and Repair jobs, especially th at the airport and 40 & Colorado station area. Retail jobs also comprise Retail a large percentage of jobs at the airport, Airport & 40th and Central Park 9.56% Knowledge-Based 24.81% station areas. The “Other” category, which includes jobs in Construction and Utilities, also represents a large share of jobs in the 38th & Blake and Peoria station areas.

Eds & Meds Employment Mix by Station Area 12.62% 100%

90% Production,

80% Distribution & Repair 70% 24.72% Government Other 60% Entertainment 17.13% 50% Retail Eds & Meds 40% Other 30% SOURCE: 2012 LEHD LODES Data Production, Distribution & Repair Figure 20: Employment Mix on East Line 20% Knowledge-Based

10%

0% East Rail Denver 38th & 40th & Central Peoria Airport & DIA Line Union Blake Colorado Park 40th Station SOURCE: 2012 LEHD LODES Data Figure 19: Employment Mix on East Line by Station Area

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 20 Demographic & Economic Characteristics

Denver Market and Development Readiness

The City & County of Denver is in the process of updating its TOD Strategic Plan. As part of this initiative, the City has collected information on market potential and development readiness at all of the East Line station areas. It has also ranked all station areas in the city on these metrics. The following tables display some of the market and development information collected for each station area, including vacant land, number of parcels, amount of redevelopment land, ownership and transit-supportive zoning. Three of the station areas have over 100 acres of vacant land: 61st & Pena (490 acres), Airport & 40th (241 acres) and Central Park (105 acres). Except for the 40th & Colorado and Peoria stations, over 80% of land in the remaining six station areas is zoning for transit-oriented development.

Parcelization Vacant Land Station Area # of Parcels Rank (1-34) Points (0-3) Acres Rank (1-34) Points (0-3) 38th and Blake 1.65 11 2 21.71 20 1 40th and Colorado 2.12 15 1 36.81 12 2 Central Park 0.95 7 3 105.29 5 3 Peoria 2.15 17 1 34.39 14 2 Airport and 40th 1.57 10 2 241.21 2 3 61st and Pena 0.07 1 3 490.30 1 3

Transit Supportive Zoning Redevelopment Land Ownership Station Area # Owners/Acre of % of Area Rank (1-34) Points (0-2) Acres Rank (1-34) Points (0-3) Vacant/Redev. Rank (1-34) Points (0-3) Land 38th and Blake 83% 24 2 24.74 6 2 1.61 23 2 40th and Colorado 38% 30 1 3.12 26 1 0.63 14 3 Central Park 84% 23 2 15.15 9 2 0.18 8 3 Peoria 0% 34 0 12.32 11 2 0.41 12 3 Airport and 40th 100% 1 2 - 33 0 0.02 4 3 61st and Pena 100% 2 2 - 34 0 0.01 3 3

Figure 21: Denver Market and Development Readiness East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 21 Station area plans have been completed for seven of the eight stations: Recent Station Area Planning Efforts • Denver Union Station The station areas along the East Rail Line present a variety of different • 38th & Blake Station development intensities and land uses, offering a diversity of options for • Central Park Station living and working along the corridor. While intensifying some of these • Peoria Station station areas is a regional priority and a key step to achieving successful • 40th & Airport Blvd. - Gateway Park TOD, planning for TOD can also mean reinforcing existing communities • 61st & Pena and neighborhoods with enhanced access to the station area, affordable • Denver Airport housing preservation, community visioning and development, and commercial revitalization. A station area plan for the 40th & Colorado station will be considered as part of a larger neighborhood planning process in Elyria-Swansea. The Cities of Denver and Aurora, as well as their housing authorities and urban renewal authorities, and the airport, have already laid the groundwork for TOD along the East Rail Line with their station area planning efforts. Vision Statements and Outcomes The following section describes these plans in more detail and outlines why a corridor-level strategy can help achieve the vision, goals, and In each station area planning process, stakeholders have come up with a objectives prescribed for each station area. vision statement and outcomes to implement that vision. The next page lists the vision statements created for each station area. Denver East Corridor: Station Area Plans International Metropolitan Denver Region City and County Airport of Denver Legend Station Area Plans as of January 2014 Frequent Bus Service ! ug e

Completed Re f Existing Light Rail Future Fixed-Guideway Transit Optional

In Process ildli fe Major Roads Future Station City of Denver Boundary No Plan ional W

Half mile around stations Na t 61st / Pena Adams County

Metropolitan Area Source: 2013 Reconnecting America Miles ! Regional Transit System Inset: Denver International Airport 0 3 6 Commerce City National Wildlife Refuge

87 36 City of Denver

! Airport / 40th Stapleton

6 INTERSTATE 70

!

40th / Colorado 38th / Blake ! Union ! Station Central Park Peoria ! ! East 26th Ave ! ! ! ! Fitzsimons/Anschutz Aurora ! ! Medical Campus ! ! INTERSTATE 225 ! Colfax 40 ! !

N !

! Peoria St [

East 8th Ave Monoco Blvd Mi 012 Figure 22: East Corridor Station Area Plans NOTE that several station names have changed since the creation of these maps: the Airport/40th station is now the 40th & Airport Blvd - Gateway Park station and Denver International Airport is known simply as Denver Airport. These changes have been reflected in the text of the document but not on the maps or data tables.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 22 Recent Station Area Planning Efforts

Station Area Jurisdiction Year Completed Vision Statement

Denver Union Station will be a multimodal transportation hub of international significance and a prominent and distinctive gateway to downtown Denver and the region.

Denver Union Station will bring critical elements of the public and private local, regional, statewide, and national transportation systems, both Denver Union Station Denver 2004 existing and future, together with private development and inspiring civic features.

Denver Union Station will create an exciting setting that will improve the connections between all transportation modes, respect the character and historical significance of the station and its adjacent neighborhoods, and provide a stimulating environment for public activity and economic vitality.

The 38th & Blake station area will become a unique destination district that provides safe and comfortable multi-modal access from the surrounding communities to the rail station, the South Platte River, and between adjacent neighborhoods. Future development of the area will emphasize its industrial heritage, historic neighborhoods, and emerging new residential and arts and entertainment districts; provide a mix of 38th & Blake Denver 2009 uses where feasible and especially near the station; ensure access and provide enhancements to the South Platte River greenway; provide enough housing and jobs to make non-auto travel modes those of choice; and provide living opportunities for people of all incomes, ages and backgrounds.

No plan, will be considered as part of From Elyria Swansea Plan: The goal of this planning effort is to provide a framework to direct future development and infrastructure around 40th & Colorado Denver Elyria-Swansea the transit station in a manner that capitalizes on the area’s access to transit by creating vibrant urban places. Neighborhood Plan (in process)

Central Park Denver 2012 “Central Park will be a sustainable, active and accessible destination for Stapleton, nearby neighborhoods and the Denver region”

Spark a vision of change for this industrial area to evolve into an area that combines a variety of transit-supportive uses; Promote the concept Peoria Aurora 2009 of the grade separation of Peoria Street and the UP rail alignment; and Promote the concept of park linkages between the Peoria-Smith transfer station and the Sand Creek Parkway

“Create notable, active, maintainable places that can evolve, grow and change over time into a vibrant mix of moderate to high density Airport & 40th Aurora 2008 pedestrian-oriented uses with strong connections to multi-modal transit and an integrated station, and where people would want to work, live, shop and gather in a beautiful, safe and convenient environment.”

61st & Pena (Proposed) Denver N/A In process

72nd & Himalaya Denver/ Aurora N/A None. (Proposed)

Denver International Denver 2012 None. Airport

Figure 23: Station Area Plan Vision Statements NOTE that several station names have changed since the creation of this table: the Airport/40th station is now the 40th & Airport Blvd - Gateway Park station and Denver International Airport is known simply as Denver Airport. These changes have been reflected in the text of the document but not on the maps or data tables.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 23 Denver Union Station

Denver Union Station Master Plan (2004)

City & County of Denver, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver Regional Council of Governments, Regional Transportation District

Link to the Plan

Vision: “Denver Union Station will be a multimodal transportation hub of international significance and a prominent and distinctive gateway to downtown Denver and the region.

Denver Union Station will bring critical elements of the public and private local, regional, statewide, and national transportation systems, both existing and future, together with private development and inspiring civic features.

Denver Union Station will create an exciting setting that will improve the connections between all transportation modes, respect the character and historical significance of the station and its adjacent neighborhoods, and provide a stimulating environment for public activity and economic vitality.” DENVER UNION STATION Master Plan September 2004 Main Goals: • Placing major transportation modes - light rail, passenger rail, and Figure 24: Denver Union Station Master Plan regional bus - below grade. This separates functions, promotes convenient and safe circulation, and frees the street level for flexible transportation uses, public spaces, and complementary redevelopment. • Restoring and rehabilitating the historic train station to serve as the main circulation and orientation space and to provide transportation services, retail, restaurant, and office uses.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 24 Denver Union Station

Plan Updates

Master Plan Supplement (2008) City & County of Denver, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver Regional Council of Governments, Regional Transportation District

Purpose:

• Reviewing the accomplishments of related planning efforts since adoption of the 2004 Master Plan; • Reiterating the major elements of the 2004 Master Plan that have not changed; • Describing the Denver Union Station Transit District; • Updating the transportation and development programs.

Figure XX: Union Station Light Rail Platform

Figure 25: Denver Union Station under construction

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 25 38th & Blake Station

38th & Blake Station Area Plan (2009)

City & County of Denver, Community Planning & Development Dept.

Link to the Plan

Vision: “The 38th & Blake station area will become a unique destination district that provides safe and comfortable multi-modal access from the surrounding communities to the rail station, the South Platte River, and between adjacent neighborhoods. Future development of the area will emphasize its industrial heritage, historic neighborhoods, and emerging new residential and arts and entertainment districts; provide a mix of uses where feasible and especially near the station; ensure access and provide enhancements to the South Platte River greenway; provide enough housing and jobs to make non-auto travel modes those of choice; and provide living opportunities for people of all incomes, ages and backgrounds.”

Main Goals: • Connect Upper Larimer, Cole and River North to the station and each other with pedestrian paths and bicycle routes

• Move vehicles safely to the station, station parking lots and through the station area without jeopardizing safe pedestrian circulation

• Address storm water management issues with sustainable, urban Figure 26: 38th & Blake Station Area Plan Cover solutions for detention, conveyance and water quality that also serve to provide usable open space that provides an amenity for the community

• Utilize the station investment to strengthen existing diverse neighborhoods and create a new center for the community

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 26 38th & Blake Station

Related Plans

38th & Blake Next Steps Traffic Operational Study (2011) City & County of Denver, Public Works Dept.

Globeville Neighborhood Plan (2013, in progress) CPD

South Platte River Corridor Study (2013) City & County of Denver, Community Planning & Development, Office of Economic Development and Parks & Recreation Depts.

River North Greenway Master Plan (2009) City & County of Denver

Vision: “Initiate an ongoing collaborative effort between citizens, property owners, Figure 27: Blake Street Flats on Blake St. & 35th St. Denver City agencies, the Greenway Foundation and numerous other public & private organizations committed to a naturally healthy & prosperous South Platte River.”

Northeast Downtown Neighborhoods Plan (2011) City & County of Denver

Vision: “The Northeast Downtown area will remain a diverse collection of urban neighborhoods with unique and distinct character. Transitions between neighborhoods will be seamless and promote the unique character of each area. Excellent street connectivity, an enhanced public realm, and good access to transit will make this an area of choice for residents, businesses, and services.”

Blake TOD (2011) Urban Land Conservancy

“This property, which has been vacant for the past year, will be stabilized and eventually developed as a mixed-use site with an emphasis on affordable housing.”

Brighton Boulevard Corridor (in progress) City & County of Denver, Public Works Policy and Planning Figure 28: Station Area Over 38th Ave. East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 27 38th & Blake – Land Use and Urban Design

Mixed-Use Main Street designation encourages a strong and activate the public realm by locating buildings, entrances mix ofth housing, office, and commercial uses with flexible use and windows in a way that creates an active and lively pedes- 38requirements & that Blake respect the residential Station fabric of the neigh- trian scaled commercial corridor. Building heights within the borhood and reinforce linear development patterns along Mixed-Use Main Street category are up to 3 stories. commercial streets. This is envisioned along Downing Street between 35th and 37th avenues. Main Street districts should Mixed-Use Residential designation includes higher density Futurehave transparent Land façades Use that allow Map people in the first floor to residential including but not limited to: garden apartments, be eyes on the street. Allowing this use near transit will en- tuck under townhouses, or multi-family buildings. Active ground floors should include residential amenities, leasing courageLand Use pedestrianPlan Draft traffic and promote commercial activity. 38th and Blake Station Area Plan The character of these mixed use streets should clearly define lobbies, workout facilities, parking entrances06.02.2009 and conve-

Pepsi

Arkins

38th Street

Platte River Chestnut St. 37th Street

40th Ave.

36th Street

Brighton Blvd.

35th Street Wynkoop St. 39th Ave.

Marion Street

Wazee St. 38th Ave. Lafayette Street

St. Charles Rec Center Blake St.

Walnut St.

37th Ave.

35th Street

Wyatt-Edison School

34th Street 36th Ave.

33rd Street

35th Ave.

Larimer St. 32rd Stree

t Gilpin Street Williams Street High Street Race Street Lawrence St. Downing Street Marion Street Lafayette Street Humbolt Street Street Franklin Bruce Randolph Ave.

31st Street

Arapahoe St.

33rd Ave. Curtis St. Wyman/Mitchell Elementary School

Cole Middle School

Martin Luther King Boulevard

Champa St.

Curtis Park 31st Ave.

Stout St. LEGEND Mixed Use -TOD Core Mixed-Use- Employment Possible Future Blake T Transit Station Streetcar Connection 0’ 200’ 400’ 800’ Mixed Use - Main Street Open Space and Parks P Central Corridor Street Car Station Parking Mixed Use - Residential New Open Space and Parks Mixed Pedestrian -Auto Street 1/4 and 1/2 Mile Walk Radius

Urban Residential FasTracks East Corridor Line Pedestrian Plaza Pedestrian Bridge Figure 6.10 29:– Future 38 Landth & Use Blake Station Area Plan Future Land Use Map

48 East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 28 40th & Colorado Station

There is no station area plan for the 40th & Colorado station. Blueprint Denver, however, provides recommendations for future land use changes in this area. Many industrial uses near the station will remain. The area adjacent to the station should become a Town Center with mixed-use development opportunities.

The single-family residential neighborhoods will remain in place. The Urban Land Conservancy sold Gateway, the land at 3975 Colorado Blvd., to the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless in January of 2012, who will continue to operate as short-term transitional housing along high frequency bus lines and the East Rail Line.

Gateway Information at the Urban Land Conservancy website

Gateway Information at the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless website Figure 30: 40th & Colorado Station Area under construction Related Plans

The Elyria-Swansea Neighborhood Plan (in development) will also cover this station area along with the National Western Stock Show station on the North Metro corridor.

More information on the E-S plan is available here: http://denvergov.org/Planning/PlansinProgress/ ElyriaSwanseaNeighborhood/tabid/432647/Default.aspx)

Figure 31: 3975 Colorado Blvd. on Colorado Blvd. & 40th Ave. East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 29 40th & Colorado Station

Future Land Use Map



 Adams County Future I-70



T

T

T

SN

DLST

NS

DLS

O O

OE ST

OE ST

E

E

SO SNT

S

IF

IF I

R

K RIS

NR KSON ST

R

R

C

R C

O

ON

A

AR

A

A AR

M

M

JA

J

G

G

H

H T

T 53RD AVE

NC

NC

O 

O

S PMO

53RD AVE PMOS

H

T

TH

T

T

S

E

N

NE S ULOMBI

ULOMBI 52ND AVE  C 70 C 52ND AVE

TSNOSKRALC

TSNOSKRALC

TSNOS

TSNOSREME

REME FasTracks North Metro Corridor LVD  51ST AVE RACE CT TON B RACE CT 51ST AVE T

S TS

ST T

ST

ST

T 51ST AVE S

51ST AVE BRIGHBRIGHTON BLVD T

TS

T

S

T

S

L

EE

E T SER SER

IN

U

EE

UL

S AP

L AP

KS

MS

K ST

UK

O

AM

OMLLI

O

A

TEEL TS ETSE

DA

TEEL ETSE

OO MLLI

NT 

WLAUK

NT

A

WL CO

AD

C

I

I

ASI

AS

MI

M

F F

FRANKLIN FRANK 50TH AVE

50TH AVE

TSNOTGNIHSAW T

SNOTGNIHSAW  ST VD

K

RKST BEEKMAN PL ZBL O

OR

T T Y

Y S UEUEZ BLVD S

E ST ON 

ASQASQ S K VV NROE ST KSON

NRO C

Swansea Park AC MO

MO JA 49TH AVE J 49TH AVE

Johnson Park and Rec Center 

448TH8TH AV E

448TH8TH AAVE T

D T T

T T

S

C

S C V T

VD

ST

ST

L

SS

ST L

CT 48TH AVE L CT

T TH AVE T 48

L T

T

T

ST

UL

U

T

U

UL

D ST

E

S

E

S

S

N

S

N

SE

AP

TE

SET

N M SST

E ST

D CET

E

D CET

E

HS

E

H ST

E

WI

A

WI

UA

BI

BIN

BE HT TS

N

GI

T AP

N

T GI

T AP

T AP

KEE

R

IV

KE

R

IV

AU

M

AZ

AZB H

A O D ST ROL YAG

N

A ROL YAG

N

N U

OT BN H

N ST I

H

I

OT BN I

RAC

RAC IW ILL

IW ILLAM PRIVATE R D

ILE PRIVATE R D 

ILE

CL

AS

ASIN

CL AS

O A

BA DL

BA DL

WA S

H O ULM

IL

ILWAU CO UL

C

F O MLLI

F O MLLI

M M

AYT 4747TH AVE L

BRIG T CLAYTON ST

T BRIGH C

T

T

S

TS

NI

L S DLT DL

O CNT

O CNT 447TH7TH AVE L

S

S

P

NK SNIL

BO NK BO

MP

A M

A

M

R O

UM

F

FR

HU H 

TH

THO

JOSEPHINE ST JOSEPHINE ST 46TH AVE



45TH AV E

Dunham Park 44 THT H 45TH AVE ST T 44TH AVE CCT 44TH AVE

S T

T 

ST

ST C

T

KINS CT

HTS

HT

D D ST

SE E

ARKINAR E

R

R

D

E

E

OL U

AC A

AC SET

ZL B AZILE

AUD

ZL B AZILE YAOL VINE ST

VINE ST L

R

R

CL

C G YA G FasTracks East Corridor VDVD 43RD AAVEVE

TONTON BL BL Globeville Landing T SMITH RDD SMITH R IIGHGH  RR PP ST ST B B OO KOO N Y

WWYNK 42ND AAVEVE

TS

TS

TS

T

ST

T

ST

ST

ST

ST

S

S

L

EE

L

DL

D

E

E

APU

APU

IFE

IFEL OR

40TH

Y OTN

AUK MLL

40 Y OTN

AUKEE

L OR MLL

R

R

A A

TH NT

NT

I

AG

L

AG

L

LW IF

TS IF ASI S I

T AS C

STT C

T

MI WL

T M S NIE ST NIE ST  41S41STT AVAVE

STEELE ST STEELE ST

L PH R EOS

E NO EPH

YORK

YORK M

TNUT P M NOR EOS ES JOS HESTNUT PL JOS CCH ST

ARKINSCTARKINSCT

440TH0TH AVAVEE 0 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000 T 36 T

DELGANYDELGANY ST S S

3 T 6TH S T T

T 38TH AVE T T S

38TH AVE S NO

H NO S Feet S

S S T

T S

M

S MS N N NS

I DA

COOK ST O

COOK ST ONST Miles

ADA A

MADI S

T MADI KL KLI K 0 52.0 5.0 N VD N VD

ARF L KOOPKOOP ST S ARF AJC N AJCKS BL YYN B WW OD

OD Elyria - Swansea

T

T S South Platte River S LVD

AR

GH

GH

I

HI H ON BLVD O ON B O AR

OCL GHT OCL BRIBRIGHT

WILLIAMS ST TSTTST WILLIAMS ST T U WALNWALNU

3636T T H S T

LAKEST BBLAKEST

3333RD ST R D S

T DOWNING ST DOWNING ST

 Elyria Swansea Small Area Plan 10.29.2008

Figure 32: Elyria Swansea Conceptual Neighborhood Land Use Plan (Not adopted) East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 30 Central Park Station

Central Park Station Area Plan (2012)

City & County of Denver, Forest City

Link to the Plan

Vision: “Central Park will be a sustainable, active and accessible destination for Stapleton, nearby neighborhoods and the Denver region.”

Main Goals: • Destination: The station area will serve as a crossroads of the Stapleton neighborhood, connecting people from all segments of the community to the diverse activities found throughout Stapleton and the Denver region. • Accessible: The station area will build upon its regional connections to provide an extremely high level of mobility and multi-modal access for all users in a safe, easy, and convenient manner. • Economic Opportunity: Stapleton will be a regional center for job creation in diverse fields, with an emphasis on new technologies and emerging industries. When completed, Stapleton could support more than 30,000 jobs and 25,000 residents. • Environmental Responsibility: Stapleton will demonstrate the economic and community benefits of a long-term commitment to reducing consumption of natural resources and impacts on the natural environment. Human activities will be conducted in a fashion that acknowledges and respects the importance of natural systems. Figure 33: Central Park Station Area Plan Cover • Social Equity: Stapleton will provide broad access to social, cultural, and economic opportunities for all segments of the community.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 31 Central Park Station

Related Plans

Stapleton Green Book (1995) City & County of Denver, Stapleton Foundation

Vision: “The Stapleton site will be a network of urban villages, employment centers and significant open spaces, all linked by a commitment to the protection of natural resources and the development of human resources.”

East Side Mobility Plan (2010-2011) City & County of Denver Public Works

Figure 34: Central Park Rail Bridge East of Central Park Blvd.

Figure 35: Central Park

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 32 ACCESSIBLE CONCEPTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

■ C.1 Mobility Network Improvements ▪ C.1.A Extend the existing Denver street grid into redevelopment areas whenever possible.

▪ C.1.B Evaluate future network improvements to traverse regional greenways for improved multi-modal connectivity throughout Stapleton.

▪ C.1.C Continue the evaluation of traffi c calming and pedestrian crossings for the 36th Avenue and Xanthia Street corridor between Central Park Boulevard and Smith Road. Traffi c calming elements may include medians, pedestrian bump-outs and additional signage. As part of this process, consider other improvement options including an enhanced pedestrian crossing at 36th Avenue and Willow Street and identify an implementation strategy.

Residents have identifi ed the 36th Avenue and Xan- ▪ C.1.D Reconstruct Smith Road section between the Quebec Square improvements thia Street intersection as a safety concern. that end at Syracuse Street and the future RTD Park-n-Ride improvements west of the future rail station.

▪ C.1.E As infi ll redevelopment occurs in the Stapleton Industrial Area, work with de- DENVER MOVES velopers to determine the feasibility and implementation of additional multi-modal Denver Moves is the vision plan for Den- connections to the station. ver’s non-motorized transportation and Central Park Station ■ C.2 Promote a High Level of Bicycle Usage recreation system, identifying the next phase of priorities for making bicycle The station should be accessible via off -street bike paths or bike lanes from all direc- and pedestrian connections throughout tions. Future Land Use Maps the city. The goals of the plan is to cre- ▪ C.2.A Support the recommendations identifi ed by Denver Moves for the station CENTRAL PARK STATION CONCEPT LAND USE MAP - PLAN RECOMMENDATIONate a biking and walking network where every household is within a quarter mile area and seek opportunities to implement Denver Moves whenever possible. of a high ease of use facility and achieve CENTRAL PARK STATION EXISTING AND PLANNED BICYCLE FACILITIES a 15% bicycling and walking commute mode share by 2020. The four objectives established for Denver Moves are: 1. Create a New Identity 2. Build a Simpler System 3. Embrace Innovative, Practical Ideas 4. Include All Users Through an extensive plan process, Denver Moves identifi es a total network of 442 miles of multi-use and bicycle facilities. The network incorporates a wide range of facility types based on T innovations in multi-use trail, bicycle, and pedestrian facility design, each being categorized into relative “ease of use” classifi cations. Denver Moves identifi es new on-street and off -street bicycle facilities that will improve access N throughout the Central Park Station area and especially to the commuter rail sta- tion. For more details about the Denver

Moves network and facility types, down- Note: Dashed lines on this map represent potential future connections in the station area. These connections may take the form of future public or private streets, alleys, load the plan at www.denvergov.org. pedestrian passages, or mews with the intent of increasing access in the station area while breaking up large blocks to improve the pedestrian experience.

34 Central Park Station Area Plan – Strategy FrameworkFigure 37: Central Park Station Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities

Note: Dashed lines on this map represent potential future connections in the station area. These connections may take the form of future public or private streets, alleys, pedestrian passages, or mews with the intent of increasing access in the station area while breaking up large blocks to improve the pedestrian experience. Figure 36: Central Park Station Concept Land Use Map

Central Park Station Area Plan – Strategy Framework 19 East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 33 Peoria Station Catalytic Site Peoria-Smith Station Area Plan A Framework for Transit-Oriented Development This site has been selected by the East Corridor Working Group as the Catalytic Project site. Additional activities are underway in 2014 by DRCOG and consultant partners, funded by the SCI grant. Peoria-Smith station Peoria-Smith Station Area Plan (2009)

City of Aurora Link to the Plan

“Spark a vision of change for this industrial area to evolve into I-225 Vision: Corridor an area that combines a variety of transit-supportive uses; Promote the concept of the grade separation of Peoria Street and the UP rail alignment; and promote the concept of park linkages between the Peoria-Smith transfer station and the Sand Creek Parkway.”

Main Goals: • Create a compact, mixed-use employment center within easy City of Aurora walking distance of the station. The area contains many barriers Final Draft, September, 2009 to connectivity and the plan provides general recommendations Figure 38: Peoria-Smith Station Area Plan Cover for making the area pedestrian, bicycle and transit-friendly.

• Utilize vacant sites with high potential for TOD. There are 22 properties with that potential, and RTD has identified three parcels for commuter parking and bus transfer facilities, while the Aurora Housing Authority owns five acres that it plans to develop into a mixed-income, multi-family housing project.

• The RTD I-225 Light Rail Line will terminate at the Peoria Station arriving from the south, making the Peoria Station a major transfer station and connect Fitzsimons to East Rail Line for the I-225 line.

Related Plans

Peoria Crossing (2013) Figure 39: Peoria Station Area under construction City & County of Denver, City of Aurora, RTD

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 34 Peoria Station PLANNING FOR TOD

Related Plans Future Land Use Map

Who is Aurora? (2013) City of Aurora

Overview: The City of Aurora published this report on the City’s demographics using data from the 2010 Census. The report details the City’s population growth, Proposed Pedestrian/Bicycle wages, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, housing and other demographic Underpass information. Key findings include that the City grew by 17.6% between 2000 and 2010, slightly lower than the 24% growth rate between 1990 and 2010, but still one of the fastest growing ar eas of the region. The report contains detailed tables, charts and maps on the population of Aurora. There are also two supplements, one focused on education in Aurora and one on the loss of population in Northwest Aurora.

Educational Supplement

Northwest Aurora Population Supplement

Figure 4. 40: Land Peoria Use Framework Station Diagram Concept Land Use Map East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 Final Draft | September 2009 11 35 40th & Airport Blvd. - Gateway Park Station

Gateway Park East: A Framework for Transit-Oriented Development (2008)

PLANNING FOR TOD City of Aurora, in consultation with RTD, City & County of Denver, DIA, the Pauls Corporation

Link to the Plan A Framework for Transit-Oriented Development GATEWAY PARK EAST STATION AREA PLAN

Vision: “Create notable, active, maintainable places that can evolve,

grow and change over time into a vibrant mix of moderate to high density

pedestrian-oriented uses with strong connections to multi-modal transit

and an integrated station, and where people would want to work, live,

shop and gather in a beautiful, safe and convenient environment.”

Gateway Park East Station Area Plan Main Goals: A Framework for Transit-Oriented Development

• Focus on developing the eastern half of the station, since the DAVID OWEN TRYBA ARCHITECTS FEHR & PEERS

western half is already built out. Full buildout of both halves EDAW, INC. CITY OF AURORA PLANNING DEPARTMENT

will include 600,000SF of office, 2.2 million SF of industrial, in consultation with: Regional Transportation District City of Aurora City and County of Denver 586,000SF of retail and 918 residential units on 1,300 acres of David Owen Tryba Architects Denver International Airport Fehr & Peers

land. EDAW, Inc.

FINAL DRAFT | AUGUST 2008 in consultation with • Utilize RTD Park-n-Ride for future TOD development. The future Regional Transportation District The Pauls Corporation City and County of Denver land use concept is employment-focused, with some mixed- Denver International Airport th use development north of 40 Avenue. The plan recommends DECEMBER 2008 grade-separating the commuter rail line from 40th Avenue in view of traffic volumes on that east-west arterial street. Gateway Park East Station Area Plan 1

This station can also serve as an alternative end of the line station, for people who take the East Rail Line and do not intend on continuing Figure 41: Gateway Park East Station Area Plan Cover through to the airport. This will also help the East Rail Line in avoiding being characterized as only the rail line that goes to the airport, when there are several destinations along this line. The land west of the station platform is land owned by Denver International Aiport that is in Aurora and can be developed by the City of Aurora.

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 36 40th & Airport Blvd. - Gateway Park Station

Related Plans

Who is Aurora? (2013) City of Aurora

Overview: The City of Aurora published this report on the City’s demographics using data from the 2010 Census. The report details the City’s population growth, wages, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, housing and other demographic information. Key findings include that the City grew by 17.6% between 2000 and 2010, slightly lower than the 24% growth rate between 1990 and 2010, but still one of the fastest growing ar eas of the region. The report contains detailed tables, charts and maps on the population of Aurora. There are also two supplements, one focused on education in Aurora and one on the loss of population in Northwest Aurora.

Educational Supplement Figure 42: Intersection at Airport Blvd. & 40th Ave. west of Peña Blvd. Northwest Aurora Population Supplement

Figure 43: Offramp onto 40th Ave. via Airport Blvd. east of Peña Blvd. East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 37 61st & Peña Station 72nd & Himalaya Station (Optional Future Station) 61st & Peña Station Area Plan and GDP (2014) There is no station area plan for 72nd & Himalaya.

City & County of Denver, Community Planning & Development Dept 72nd & Himalaya Station is a potential future station and will not be open when the East Rail Line opens. Link to the Plan Related Plans Vision: 61st and Pena station serves as a vibrant, compact, urban center of the regional aerotropolis, a world-class transit-oriented High Point GDP (2007) community, catalyzing development and connecting people. City & County of Denver

Related Plans Gateway Stations

Denver International Business Center Overview: LNR CPI High Point, LLC owns 369.86 acres of land along Pena City & County of Denver Blvd, and the City has proposed an additional station here. This GDP calls for large office uses, especially a headquarters, and some residential. Retail and Overview: The City and County of Denver and RTD entered into an agreement entertainment uses are also in the site plan. allowing a station at 61st as early as opening day. There are four property owners with a total of 400 acres of vacant land. A station area plan was completed in early 2014 and a General Development Plan is underway.

Figure 44: Design concept for the 61st and Pena station

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 38 Denver Airport Station

South Terminal Redevelopment Program (2012)

City & County of Denver

Link to the Plan

Overview: The airport station will include a 500-room Westin hotel and conference center, an open air plaza, and an extended concourse baggage and train system. There will be new retail opportunities as well.

The airport serves as a unique destination. The East Rail Line will connect to other transit corridors with Denver Union Station, the I-225 and Southeast Lines via the Peoria station, revolutionizing the way in which travelers can reach the airport in a short amount of time without traffic or parking. In 2012, DIA averaged over 1,700 daily flights and served a total 53.2 million totall passengers, and ranked 5th in the U.S. and 13th in the world for passenger traffic.

Figure 45: Interior view of the train platform at the South Terminal

Figure 46: Ground-level view from the southwest of the platform

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 39 Denver Airport Station

Related Plans

Airport City Plan (2012) City & County of Denver, DIA

Overview: Mayor Hancock has announced a long-term plan to transform the land around DIA into Airport City, with six economic cluster zones extended out over 53 acres of land: Agro, Aero, Center, Gateway, Logistics and Tech. The plan calls the East Line a “Corridor of Opportunity.” From his speech: Figure XX: Aerial view of the plaza from the west “We have a unique opportunity to take our region’s biggest economic engine, Denver International Airport, and spark a new era of growth that will transform Metro Denver and revitalize the regional economy…We will create a development that thrives on the airport’s natural synergy, attracting businesses and jobs that benefit from a close relationship to the airport and its inherent access to national and international markets…Think of the Airport City as the beating heart of the larger Aerotropolis. …And what is that Aerotropolis? It’s a vision of a new style of urban development, one that places the airport at the center of attention, a magnet for urban competitiveness, urban innovation, and urban job growth.”

Aerotropolis

The City is now working with the airport, Adams County and private developers to flesh out the Airport City concept and provide more detailed recommendations for implementation of this plan. The Airport City plan covers land owned by Denver International Airport in the City & County of Denver and is focused on developing industry clusters on airport-owned land. The Aerotropolis is a broader concept of developing the land around the airport, including land in Adams County and other neighboring jurisdictions into an airport-oriented community. The latter will involve inter-jurisdictional coordination by Denver, Adams County and other communities in order to come to fruition.

Figure 47: Interior view of the train platform

East Corridor Profile Report June 2014 40