Select Committee on Economic Affairs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Select Committee on Economic Affairs SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AFFAIRS The Economic Case for HS2 Oral and Written Evidence Contents 20 Miles More—Written evidence ......................................................................................................... 4 51m—Written evidence ......................................................................................................................... 10 Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce—Written evidence .......................................... 15 Ampthill Square Tenants and Residents Association—Written evidence .................................. 18 Alan Andrews—Written evidence ....................................................................................................... 45 Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF)—Written evidence ....... 64 William Avery—Written evidence ...................................................................................................... 67 Aylesbury Park Golf Club Ltd—Written evidence .......................................................................... 70 Professor David Banister and Dr Moshe Givoni—Written evidence .......................................... 77 Chris Belk—Written evidence.............................................................................................................. 84 Bluespace Thinking Ltd—Written evidence ...................................................................................... 90 Andrew Bodman—Written evidence ................................................................................................. 98 Primavera Boman-Behram—Written evidence............................................................................... 113 British Chambers of Commerce—Written evidence .................................................................... 118 Marilyn Brown and Steve Brown—Written evidence ................................................................... 121 Buckinghamshire County Council—Written evidence ................................................................. 124 Camden Town Unlimited—Written evidence ................................................................................ 136 Dr Paul Carter—Written evidence ................................................................................................... 138 Chiltern Ridges (HS2) Action Group—Written evidence ........................................................... 140 Chiltern Society—Written evidence ................................................................................................. 145 Connected Cities—Written evidence .............................................................................................. 154 Dr Chris Eaglen LLB MIET—Written evidence .............................................................................. 161 Eastern High Speed Rail Network Partnership—Written evidence .......................................... 167 Mrs Mary Gair—Written evidence .................................................................................................... 173 Professor Mike Geddes—Written evidence ................................................................................... 174 Cheryl Gillan MP—Written evidence ............................................................................................... 183 Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce—Written evidence .......................................... 191 Greater Manchester Combined Authority—Written evidence .................................................. 193 High Speed UK—Written evidence .................................................................................................. 203 Mike Hill—Written evidence .............................................................................................................. 226 HMG Department for Transport—Written evidence .................................................................. 230 Kelvin Hopkins MP—Written evidence ............................................................................................ 241 Rex Hora—Written evidence ............................................................................................................. 247 HS2 Action Alliance—Written evidence .......................................................................................... 248 HS2 Ltd—Written evidence ................................................................................................................ 275 Kings Bromley Stop HS2 Action Group—Written evidence ...................................................... 285 KPMG LLP—Written evidence .......................................................................................................... 287 Liverpool City Region—Written evidence ...................................................................................... 301 The London Borough of Camden—Written evidence ................................................................. 307 London Borough of Hillingdon—Written evidence ....................................................................... 313 London Borough of Newham—Written evidence ......................................................................... 325 Professor Peter Mackie—Written evidence .................................................................................... 332 Stan Mason—Written evidence .......................................................................................................... 337 Neil Mathers FIMechE—Written evidence ...................................................................................... 339 Mid Yorkshire Chamber of Commerce Limited—Written evidence ........................................ 341 Netley Primary School Governing Body—Written evidence ...................................................... 344 Network Rail—Written evidence ...................................................................................................... 346 North West Business Leadership Team—Written evidence ...................................................... 351 Pan-Camden HS2 Alliance—Written evidence ............................................................................... 370 Helen Peach—Written evidence ........................................................................................................ 378 Stephen Plowden—Written evidence ............................................................................................... 380 Christopher Prideaux DL—Written evidence ................................................................................ 424 Rail Freight Group—Written evidence ............................................................................................ 432 Matthew Semple—Written evidence ................................................................................................ 435 Dr Nigel Shepperson—Written evidence ........................................................................................ 436 Stoke-on-Trent City Council—Written evidence.......................................................................... 441 Stop HS2—Written evidence ............................................................................................................. 444 Dr Richard Stubbs—Written evidence ............................................................................................. 457 Tonge & Breedon HS2 Action Group—Written evidence .......................................................... 459 Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford—Written evidence ............................................ 462 Transport Watch—Written evidence .............................................................................................. 468 Twyford Parish Council—Written evidence ................................................................................... 473 Professor Roger Vickerman—Written evidence ............................................................................ 477 Volterra Partners—Written evidence .............................................................................................. 479 Madeleine Wahlberg—Written evidence ......................................................................................... 486 Michael Wand—Written evidence .................................................................................................... 488 J A Waters—Written evidence .......................................................................................................... 492 W J Waters—Written evidence ........................................................................................................ 493 Wendover HS2—Written evidence .................................................................................................. 495 West Midlands Integrated Transport Authority—Written evidence ........................................ 505 Whitmore & Baldwins Gate HS2 Action Group—Written evidence........................................ 517 Whittington and Fisherwick Parish Council—Written evidence ................................................ 521 Daniel Richard Wolfe—Written evidence ....................................................................................... 525 20 Miles More—Written evidence 20 Miles More—Written evidence 20 Miles More is a campaign supported by a coalition of leading business figures and academics to have the proposed HS2 network extended to include Liverpool. At present Liverpool is the only major city in the North and Midlands not directly connected to HS2
Recommended publications
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover London
    Discover London Page 1 London Welcome to your free “Discover London” city guide. We have put together a quick and easy guide to some of the best sites in London, a guide to going out and shopping as well as transport information. Don’t miss our local guide to London on page 31. Enjoy your visit to London. Visitor information...........................................................................................................Page 3 Tate Modern....................................................................................................................Page 9 London Eye.....................................................................................................................Page 11 The Houses of Parliament...............................................................................................Page 13 Westminster Abbey........................................................................................................Page 15 The Churchill War Rooms...............................................................................................Page 17 Tower of London............................................................................................................Page 19 Tower Bridge..................................................................................................................Page 21 Trafalgar Square.............................................................................................................Page 23 Buckingham Palace.........................................................................................................Page
    [Show full text]
  • Solent to the Midlands Multimodal Freight Strategy – Phase 1
    OFFICIAL SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS MULTIMODAL FREIGHT STRATEGY – PHASE 1 JUNE 2021 OFFICIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. STRATEGIC AND POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS ROUTE ........................................................................................................ 28 4. THE ROAD ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 5. THE RAIL ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40 6. KEY SECTORS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 7. FREIGHT BETWEEN THE SOLENT AND THE MIDLANDS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Technical Report
    Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: 31 March – 9 June 2021 This document contains the full Consultation Technical Report, without the Appendices. To access the Appendices, please visit www.eastwestrail.co.uk 01. Introduction 18 - 26 07. Project Section B: Bletchley and the Marston Vale Line 100 - 229 1.1. Chapter Summary 18 7.1. Chapter Summary 101 1.2. East West Rail 19 7.2. Introduction 104 1.3. The Project 19 7.3. Service Concepts 109 1.4. Consultation 23 7.4. Bletchley Station 141 1.5. Technical Report 26 7.5. Fenny Stratford Additional Track 144 02. The Case for East West Rail 27 - 31 7.6. Level Crossings on the Marston Vale Line 146 2.1. Chapter Summary 27 7.7. Marston Vale Line Infrastructure Upgrade 228 2.2. The overall case for East West Rail 28 08. Project Section C: Bedford 230 - 299 2.3. Benefits of railways over road improvements 31 8.1. Chapter Summary 230 03. Project Objectives 32 - 42 8.2. Introduction 234 3.1. Chapter Summary 32 8.3. Bedford St Johns 238 3.2. Introduction 33 8.4. Bedford Station 250 3.3. Safety 34 8.5. North Bedford 268 3.4. Environment 34 8.6. Conclusion 297 3.5. EWR Services 34 09. Project Section D: Clapham Green to The Eversdens 300 - 371 3.6. Connectivity 36 9.1. Chapter Summary 301 3.7. Customer Experience and Stations 37 9.2. Introduction 303 3.8. Powering EWR Services 38 9.3. Option Development 306 3.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex G – Forming & Delivering a Strategy
    Swindon and Wiltshire Rail Study 09/05/2019 Reference number 107523 ANNEX G – FORMING & DELIVERING A STRATEGY SWINDON AND WILTSHIRE RAIL STUDY ANNEX G – FORMING & DELIVERING A STRATEGY IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client/Project owner Swindon and Wiltshire Local Enterprise Partnership Project Swindon and Wiltshire Rail Study Study Annex G – Forming & Delivering a Strategy Type of document Report Date 09/05/2019 File name Framework N/A Reference number 107523 Number of pages 33 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Modifications Author J Jackson Associate 12/03/2019 Checked A Sykes Associate 13/03/2019 1 by Approved D Bishop Director 15/03/2019 by Author J Jackson Associate 09/05/2019 Checked A Sykes Associate 09/05/2019 2 by Approved A Sykes Associate 09/05/2019 by TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. IDENTIFYING THE COMPONENTS OF THE STRATEGY 7 3. NETWORK-WIDE INITIATIVES 8 4. GREAT WESTERN MAINLINE 11 RECOMMENDATIONS 11 PHASE 0: 1 TPH WESTBURY – SWINDON 12 PHASE 1: 1 TPH SOUTHAMPTON CENTRAL – SWINDON 13 PHASE 2 & 2A: GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 14 PHASE 3: EXTENSION OF GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 16 DELIVERY OF GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 16 THE SOUTH COTSWOLDS LINE 17 5. BERKS & HANTS ROUTE 18 EXTENSION OF LONDON – BEDWYN SERVICES 18 DEVIZES PARKWAY 19 EXTENSION OF LONDON – WESTBURY SERVICES TO BRISTOL (PEAK ONLY) 19 ENHANCEMENT OF PADDINGTON – EXETER SERVICES TO HOURLY 19 DELIVERING AND ENHANCED BERKS & HANTS SERVICE 19 6. WEST OF ENGLAND LINE 21 SALISBURY – LONDON JOURNEY TIME REDUCTIONS 21 PORTON STATION 22 WILTON STATION 23 ANDOVER – LUDGERSHALL LINE 23 7. TRANS WILTS CORRIDOR 24 ASHTON PARK STATION 25 THE IMPACT OF METRO WEST 25 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future
    Infrastructure for Business Flying into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying into the Future Flying into the Future têáííÉå=Äó=`çêáå=q~óäçêI=pÉåáçê=bÅçåçãáÅ=^ÇîáëÉê=~í=íÜÉ=fça aÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMNO P Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ________________________________________ 5 1. GRowInG AVIATIon SUSTAInABlY ______________________ 27 2. ThE FoUR CRUnChES ______________________________ 35 3. ThE BUSInESS VIEw oF AIRpoRT CApACITY ______________ 55 4. A lonG-TERM plAn FoR GRowTh ____________________ 69 Q Flying into the Future Executive summary l Aviation provides significant benefits to the economy, and as the high growth markets continue to power ahead, flying will become even more important. “A holistic plan is nearly two thirds of IoD members think that direct flights to the high growth countries will be important to their own business over the next decade. needed to improve l Aviation is bad for the global and local environment, but quieter and cleaner aviation in the UK. ” aircraft and improved operational and ground procedures can allow aviation to grow in a sustainable way. l The UK faces four related crunches – hub capacity now; overall capacity in the South East by 2030; excessive taxation; and an unwelcoming visa and border set-up – reducing the UK’s connectivity and making it more difficult and more expensive to get here. l This report sets out a holistic aviation plan, with 25 recommendations to address six key areas: − Making the best use of existing capacity in the short term; − Making decisions about where new runways should be built as soon as possible, so they can open in the medium term; − Ensuring good surface access and integration with the wider transport network, in particular planning rail services together with airport capacity, not separately; − Dealing with noise and other local environment impacts; − Not raising taxes any further; − Improving the visa regime and operations at the UK border.
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport
    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport 30 August 2017 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Department for Transport’s information and use in relation to Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Business Case. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 108 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5159267 Document ref: v4.0 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Interim draft for client Rev 1.0 - 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft for client Rev 2.0 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft addressing Rev 3.0 - 22/08/2017 client comment Rev 4.0 Final 30/08/2017 Client signoff Client Department for Transport Project Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Document title Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme: KO1 Final Business Case Job no. 5159267 Copy no. Document reference Atkins Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme | Version 4.0 | 30 August 2017 | 5159267 2 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 12 1.1. Background 12 1.2. Report Structure 13 2. Scope of the Appraisal 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Scenario Development 14 3. Timetable Development 18 3.1. Overview 18 4. Demand & Revenue Forecasting 26 4.1. Introduction 26 4.2. Forecasting methodology 26 4.3. Appraisal of Benefits 29 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cabinet, 06/03/2018 14:00
    Public Document Pack Agenda Cabinet Time and Date 2.00 pm on Tuesday, 6th March 2018 Place Committee Room 3 - Council House Public business 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interest 3. Minutes (Pages 5 - 28) (a) To agree the minutes from the meetings of Cabinet on 13th and 20th February 2018 (b) Matters arising 4. Exclusion of Press And Public To consider whether to exclude the press and public for the item(s) of private business for the reasons shown in the report. 5. The Implementation of the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 (Pages 29 - 108) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 6. Broadgate House (Pages 109 - 114) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 7. Coventry's Economic Growth and Prosperity Strategy 2018-2022 (Pages 115 - 130) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 8. Recommendations from the Business, Economy and Enterprise Scrutiny Board (3) Digital Strategy Task and Finish Group (Pages 131 - 140) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) Page 1 9. Average Speed Enforcement (Pages 141 - 148) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 10. Public Realm Phase 5 (Pages 149 - 168) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 11. 2018/2019 Transportation and Highway Maintenance Capital Programme (Pages 169 - 192) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 12. Connecting Coventry - Strategic Transport Investment Programme Update (Pages 193 - 214) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 13. Managed Service for Temporary Agency Workers Award of Contract (Pages 215 - 220) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (People) 14. Outstanding Issues (Pages 221 - 224) Report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Tunnel at Folkestone on Time (15:36 Hrs1)
    BEA-TT RAIB Bureau d’enquêtes sur les Accidents Rail Accident de transport terrestre Investigation Branch Technical Investigation Report concerning the Fire on Eurotunnel Freight Shuttle 7412 on 11 september 2008 This document is a translation of the French original report November 2010 BEA-TT -- RAIB Conseil général de Department for l’Environnement et du Transport Développement durable Bureau d’enquêtes sur les Rail Accident accidents de transport Investigation Branch terrestre Affaire n° BEATT-2008-015 Technical Investigation Report concerning the Fire on Eurotunnel Freight Shuttle 7412 on 11 September 2008 (translation of French original) BEA-TT – Bureau d'enquêtes sur les Accidents RAIB – Rail accident investigation branch de transport terrestre Tour Pascal B – 92055 La Défense cedex The Wharf – Stores Road – Derby DE21 4BA Tél : +33 (0)1 40 81 21 83 Tél : +44 1332 253000 Fax : +33 (0)1 40 81 21 50 Fax : +44 1332 253001 mél : [email protected] e-mail : [email protected] www.bea-tt.developpement-durable.gouv.fr http://www.raib.gov.uk 1 / 166 BEA-TT -- RAIB Notice The technical investigation covered by this report was performed by collaboration between the competent French and UK organizations in charge of railway accidents investigations. In France, the investigation was performed by the Bureau d’Enquêtes sur les Accidents de Transport Terrestre (BEA-TT) according to Section III of Law No. 2002-3 of 3 January 2002 as amended, and Decree No. 2004-85 of 26 January 2004 as amended, relating in particular to technical investigations following an accident or incident involving land transport facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Would a New Hub Airport Be Commercially Viable?
    Would a new hub airport be commercially viable? Prepared for the Transport Committee January 25th 2013 Oxera i Draft for Comment: Strictly Confidential Oxera Consulting Ltd is registered in England No. 2589629 and in Belgium No. 0883.432.547. Registered offices at Park Central, 40/41 Park End Street, Oxford, OX1 1JD, UK, and Stephanie Square Centre, Avenue Louise 65, Box 11, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material and the integrity of the analysis presented herein, the Company accepts no liability for any actions taken on the basis of its contents. Oxera Consulting Ltd is not licensed in the conduct of investment business as defined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Anyone considering a specific investment should consult their own broker or other investment adviser. The Company accepts no liability for any specific investment decision, which must be at the investor’s own risk. © Oxera, 2013. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part may be used or reproduced without permission. Executive summary The Transport Committee is conducting an inquiry into the UK’s aviation strategy.1 Commissioned by the Committee and prepared by Oxera, this report assesses the conditions under which a new hub airport is, or is not, likely to be commercially viable. The assessment does not evaluate a specific proposal for a new hub; rather, it includes a range of scenarios covering various airport designs, demand forecasts, cost estimates and assumptions about the level of airport charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner and South London Rail and Tube Alternatives
    Alternative Routes from Portslade When services are severely disrupted, we will arrange for your ticket to be accepted as indicated below to get you to your destination. Rail replacement buses may be arranged in certain cases. Please listen to announcements for further information about this. The bus stop for service 6 towards Brighton is in Boundary Road (stop J) The bus stop for services 7, 25, 25X, N25, 46 and 49 towards Brighton is outside the station in Portland Road (stop G) The bus stop for service 46 towards Southwick is opposite the station in Portland Road (stop H) The bus stops for service 700 towards Worthing or Littlehampton (for Bognor Regis, Chichester and Portsmouth) are on the main A259 coast road at the end of Boundary Road To: Suggested routes: Aldrington Bus 7(limited service), 25/25X(limited service), N25(night bus), 46 or 49 Angmering Bus 700 Barnham There are no practical public transport alternatives to this destination. If we are unable to run trains, we will do our best to run replacement buses, however there may be a long wait Bognor Regis Bus 700 (change at Littlehampton) Brighton Bus 6, 7(limited service), 25/25X(limited service), N25(night bus), 46 or 49 Chichester Bus 700 (change at Littlehampton) Clapham Junction Bus 6 to Brighton station then Southern train Durrington-on-Sea Bus 700 East Croydon Bus 6 to Brighton station then Southern or Thameslink train East Worthing Bus 700 Fareham Bus 700 (change at Littlehampton and Chichester) to Portsmouth & Southsea then South West Trains or Great Western Railway train Fishersgate Walk via Victoria Road and Trafalgar Road Ford There are no practical public transport alternatives to this destination.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Competition for and in the Market Co-Exist in Terms of Delivering Cost Efficient Services? Evidence from Open Access Train O
    Transportation Research Part A 113 (2018) 114–124 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tra Can competition for and in the market co-exist in terms of delivering cost efficient services? Evidence from open access train T operators and their franchised counterparts in Britain ⁎ Phill Wheata, , Andrew S.J. Smitha, Torris Rasmussenb a Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK b Norwegian Railway Directorate, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This paper aims to inform an important policy debate in Europe on how best to open up pas- Returns to density senger rail markets to increased competition: and specifically, whether to allow open access train Competition-in-the-market operators alongside franchised (tendered) operators. The paper utilises new British data to Competition-for-the-market analyse the cost side of this debate. Our data is unique in that we have cost data by route level for both the incumbent (corresponding to British franchises) and the open access operators, as op- posed to only having cost data on the incumbent at the network level as in other countries. The open access operators are found to have comparable unit costs to franchised operators. This is unexpected considering the significant returns to density that benefit the larger franchised op- erators. This is subsequently found to be due to lower input prices and an ‘open access business model’ effect that outweigh any density disadvantages. Overall we find that there are negligible cost disadvantages of allowing open access operators to compete with franchised intercity op- erators.
    [Show full text]