DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 European Elections Campaign

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EUROPEAN ELECTIONS MONITORING CENTER WEB ARCHIVE - RESEARCH REPORT EUROPEAN ELECTIONS CAMPAIGN IMAGES, TOPICS, MEDIA IN THE 28 MEMBER STATES Editors Edoardo Novelli Bengt Johansson 2019 EUROPEAN ELE TORAL CAMPAIGNS Eds Edoardo Novelli Bengt Johanssonwww.electionsmonitoringcenter.eu Manuscript completed in June 2019 PE 637.961 The European Parliament is not liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse of this publication. Brussels, ©European Union 2019 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). www.electionsmonitoringcenter.eu [email protected] @eemc.europe @eemc_eu EUROPEAN ELECTIONS CAMPAIGN IMAGES, TOPICS, MEDIA IN THE 28 MEMBER STATES Editors Edoardo Novelli Bengt Johansson International research project lead by University Roma Tre Funded by the European Parliament Category Events COMM/SUBV/2018/E/0147 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit July 2019 - PE 637.961 CREDITS EDITORS EDOARDO NOVELLI BENGT JOHANSSON WEB DATA INTELLIGENCE & PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT KAPUSONS WWW.KAPUSONS.IT EXTREME WWW.WEB-LIVE.IT UGO ESPOSITO, DANIELE CALABRESE, RICCARDO DI MARCANTONIO, EMANUELA D’EUGENIO, FLORESTANO PASTORE, DANIELE DI BELLA, GIANLUCA LAVEZZO, DANIEL VERES. GRAPHIC & DESIGN LORENZO PIERFELICE (WEB DESIGN) DATA ANALYST IRENE ARTIBANI PRODUCTION AND GRAPHICAL SUPPORT CASSIOPEA ROMA SRL ABOUT THE PUBLISHER THIS REPORT WAS CO-EDITED BY THE PUBLIC OPINION MONITORING UNIT WITHIN THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMMUNICATION (DG COMM) OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. TO CONTACT THE PUBLIC OPINION MONITORING UNITE PLEASE WRITE TO [email protected] DISCLAMER THIS DOCUMENT IS RESULT OF A INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT LED BY ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY AND CO-FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (EP)’S WITHIN THE MULTIANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME FOR GRANTS IN THE AREA OF COMMUNICATION (2016-2019), CATEGORY OF COMMUNICATION ACTIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE 2019 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS COMM/SUBV/2018 /E. THE CONTENT OF THE DOCUMENT IS THE SOLE RESPONSABILITY OF ITS AUTHOR(S) AND ANY OPINION EXPRESSED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE PARLIAMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 THE PROJECT PLATFORM EUROPE 13 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS MONITORING CENTER INTRODUCTION 14 TYPE OF MATERIAL AND AREAS OF MONITORING 16 ON WHICH DIMENSION ARE THE CONTENTS FOCUSED ON? 18 HOW IS EUROPE REPRESENTED? 19 MAIN TOPICS OF THE CAMPAIGN 20 NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN 21 PERSONALIZATION OF THE CAMPAIGN 23 NUMBERS OF SOCIAL CONTENTS 24 FACEBOOK POSTS BY COUNTRY 25 TOP20 POLITICAL PARTIES BY POSTS 26 FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT BY COUNTRY 27 TOP20 POLITICAL PARTIES BY ENGAGEMENT 28 FACEBOOK REACTIONS BY COUNTRY 29 TOP20 POLITICAL PARTIES BY REACTIONS 30 33 NATIONAL REPORTS AUSTRIA 35 BELGIUM 43 BULGARIA 51 CROATIA 59 CYPRUS 67 CZECH REPUBLIC 77 DENMARK 85 ESTONIA 93 FINLAND 101 FRANCE 109 GERMANY 117 GREECE 125 HUNGARY 135 IRELAND 143 ITALY 151 LATVIA 159 LITHUANIA 167 LUXEMBOURG 174 MALTA 183 NETHERLANDS 191 POLAND 199 PORTUGAL 207 ROMANIA 215 SLOVAKIA 223 SLOVENIA 231 SPAIN 239 SWEDEN 247 UNITED KINGDON 255 263 APPENDIX MEMBERS OF NATIONAL LOCAL UNITS 264 INSTITUTIONS INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT 266 WORKSHOPS 268 CODEBOOK OF THE MONITORING 270 www.electionsmonitoringcenter.eu FOCUS: LUXEMBOURG THE PROJECT PLATFORM EUROPE Edoardo Novelli Coordinator of the EEMC Università Roma Tre [email protected] 8 PLATFORM EUROPE Platform Europe is an international research project led by Roma • to improve the transnational circulation of the electoral materials Tre University and co-funded by the European Parliament (EP) produced in the different nations; within the multiannual work program for grants in the area of • to allow European citizens to access and compare the different communication (2016-2019), category of communication actions national European campaigns and political proposals; in support of the 2019 European Elections COMM/SUBV/2018 /E. • to improve the comparative study and knowledge of European As explained in the call for proposal, the EP’s aim was ”to co- political communication, political cultures and political history. finance communication actions aimed at providing citizens with Platform Europe’s specific aims were: non–partisan and factual information in the run up to the 2019 • to establish 28 National research units European elections to be held on 23-26 May 2019. For the purpose • to define Codebooks of analysis of this call for bids, “communication actions” are online and offline • to develop an online web-platform for the analysis and uploading actions and products that stimulate debate and engagement in the of the materials European democratic process”. • to monitor, collect and analyse the European electoral campaigns The principal investigator of the Platform Europe research project in the 28 Member States. and coordinator of the European Election Monitoring Centre is prof. • to create a database of electoral materials produced for the Edoardo Novelli, Università di Roma Tre, Italy. European Election campaigns in each Member State. The co-coordinator of the European Election Monitoring Centre is • to develop a digital platform containing the materials collected. prof. Bengt Johansson, Gothenburg University, Sweden. • to run 26 national workshops. Platform Europe’s general aims were: • to release research reports on the European electoral campaign • to promote the dissemination and knowledge of the European progress and development, at both national and transnational election campaign; level. To accomplish these goals, an international network of scholars • A Final Conference of the Platform Europe project at the House on political communication and electoral campaigns and a great of European History in Brussels, on 11 July 2019. number of researchers were selected at the end of 2018, through an • Articles in academic journals and presentations at national and international “call for research”, with presentations at international international scientific conferences. conferences, such as the 2018 Ecrea conference in Zürich. At • Reviews and comments in national newspapers and on television the beginning of 2019, a network of around fifty university and stations. research centres, with more than a hundred scholars, researchers • More articles and analyses, which will be published during 2019 and PhD students, was ready to start work. During a two-day and beyond. Organisational Meeting, held at Università di Roma Tre on 9 and 10 April 2019, the EEMC website and the back office platform were Today, Social Research cannot progress without an integrated officially presented to the representatives of the 28 national methodological approach to observing phenomena. For this research units, also involved in a one-day training session on the reason, we thought that it was necessary to implement methods analysis codebooks and the monitoring and use of the platform. and tools that would allow the performance of extensive and The analysis looked at verbal aspects of the campaign content, widespread research, and the real-time collection of an enormous whether the appeals had a national or European dimension, amount of data, constantly produced both on the web and which policy issue the content focused on, whether negativity and social media. Platform Europe and EEMC have been supported humour were used. We also analysed visual elements, such as by a technological tool in 28 European countries: an engine that facial expressions and the dress code adopted by the politicians, collected all the Facebook posts produced by the main parties and iconographic styles, and to what extent political symbols were politicians who ran in the European elections. visible. More than 1000 posters and press ads, and almost 500 For this research, a crawler managed by a small AI component television commercials for the 2019 election campaign were collected all the Facebook content posted by monitored accounts, collected and analysed. The examination of Facebook posts was in order to make them available to the various European research even more extensive, with the categorisation of more than 11000 teams involved in this political communication analysis. While 9 different kinds of post. This dataset offers a unique opportunity to gathering the content, the engine automatically assigned a see whether there are differences in both campaign content and thematic attribution following the analysis model developed by the campaign style around Europe and between parties. scientific community participating in the project. The crawler worked on a 4-weeks time span, gathering 30,016 The main outputs of Platform Europe are: elements from social media and providing updated metrics in real • The online European Election Monitoring Centre EEMC time, such as the engagement generated by political subjects and (www.electionsonitoringcenter.eu). It started its activity at the the most relevant topics of the online political agenda. beginning of the electoral campaign and, during the four weeks The web intelligence platform supplied each national research leading up to the vote, allowed thousands of visitors to watch unit with a reserved area in the back office, where they were able the evolution of the electoral campaigns in the 28 nations and to to monitor and file all the contents gathered during the election compare their similarities and differences. campaign. Specific codebooks were drawn up both to file the social • A multidisciplinary
Recommended publications
  • The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1

    The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1

    All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis1 Luke March University of Edinburgh [email protected] Paper for PSA 2013 Draft version 1.0. Work very much in progress. Please do not quote without author’s permission. Why has the left failed to benefit from the post-2008 economic crisis? This is a common, but perhaps slightly unfair question. It is difficult to see any one political family as a unique beneficiary, and indeed the right’s apparent earlier ideological hegemony has become unstuck with the ‘austerity medicine’ having consistently failed to revive the European patient. Nevertheless, there is still something remarkable about socio-economic conditions that should be a ‘perfect storm’ for left-wing politics regularly failing to produce anything like a clear boon for the left. The February 2013 Italian elections are just the latest that may mark a ‘no- confidence’ vote in the Centre-Left (McDonnell and Bobba 2013). The social democratic Democratic Party (PD) and its more leftist ally, the post-communist Left Ecology Freedom threw away an apparently unassailable lead to squeak ahead of the right and Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement. This paper aims to contribute to answering this overarching question by comparing the policy and ideological response to the crisis undertaken by the three ‘left’ transnational party federations (TNPs) at European level, the Party of European Socialists (PES), European Green Party (EGP) and European Left Party (EL).2 Comparing the three TNPs is an apposite approach. Although TNPs are ‘timidly rising actors’, relatively weak formations that fall far short of being fully integrated parties, they at the very least aspire to a minimal level of ideological and policy co-ordination (Bardi 2004; cf.

  • Green Deal – the Coordinators

    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
  • Agreement Between the United Kingdom of Great Britain And

    Agreement Between the United Kingdom of Great Britain And

    Luxembourg No. 1 (2019) Agreement between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on the Participation in Certain Elections of Nationals of Each Country Resident in the Territory of the Other Luxembourg, 18 June 2019 [The Agreement is not in force] Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2019 CP 141 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-1467-2 CCS0719538732 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG ON THE PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN ELECTIONS OF NATIONALS OF EACH COUNTRY RESIDENT IN THE TERRITORY OF THE OTHER The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”;
  • The Dark Unknown History

    The Dark Unknown History

    Ds 2014:8 The Dark Unknown History White Paper on Abuses and Rights Violations Against Roma in the 20th Century Ds 2014:8 The Dark Unknown History White Paper on Abuses and Rights Violations Against Roma in the 20th Century 2 Swedish Government Official Reports (SOU) and Ministry Publications Series (Ds) can be purchased from Fritzes' customer service. Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer are responsible for distributing copies of Swedish Government Official Reports (SOU) and Ministry publications series (Ds) for referral purposes when commissioned to do so by the Government Offices' Office for Administrative Affairs. Address for orders: Fritzes customer service 106 47 Stockholm Fax orders to: +46 (0)8-598 191 91 Order by phone: +46 (0)8-598 191 90 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.fritzes.se Svara på remiss – hur och varför. [Respond to a proposal referred for consideration – how and why.] Prime Minister's Office (SB PM 2003:2, revised 02/05/2009) – A small booklet that makes it easier for those who have to respond to a proposal referred for consideration. The booklet is free and can be downloaded or ordered from http://www.regeringen.se/ (only available in Swedish) Cover: Blomquist Annonsbyrå AB. Printed by Elanders Sverige AB Stockholm 2015 ISBN 978-91-38-24266-7 ISSN 0284-6012 3 Preface In March 2014, the then Minister for Integration Erik Ullenhag presented a White Paper entitled ‘The Dark Unknown History’. It describes an important part of Swedish history that had previously been little known. The White Paper has been very well received. Both Roma people and the majority population have shown great interest in it, as have public bodies, central government agencies and local authorities.
  • Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union Acknowledgements

    Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union Acknowledgements

    NJ-79-11-114-EN- C T E G R BARRIERSCHALLENGES MICROFINANCE A T IO Y N ALIT DE EQU VEL USION OPMENT CL SM AR EX T TO OLS ST S ION AIN M AB A SOCIAL AT ILI RT TY EDUC HEALTH Y GREEN N S IO O T MMUNIT Empowering CIA VA CLIM L INNO AT CO USIVE GROW E CHANGE INCL SOCIAL people, I M TH P RO V ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOBS E driving change W RO ELLBEING P XI MI GROW FA TY ARE IR TR Social Innovation WELF ADE TH in the European Union doi:10.2796/13155 HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS Free publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Union’s representations or delegations. You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. Priced publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). Priced subscriptions (e.g. annual series of the Official Journal of the European Union and reports of cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union): • via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm). Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu).
  • EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10

    EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10

    EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende und deren Stellvertreter*innen Auf den konstituierenden Sitzungen am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, haben die siebenundzwanzig permanenten Ausschüsse des EU-Parlaments ihre Vorsitzenden und Stellvertreter*innen gewählt. Nachfolgend die Ergebnisse (Reihenfolge analog zur Auflistung auf den Seiten des Europäischen Parlaments): Ausschuss Vorsitzender Stellvertreter Witold Jan WASZCZYKOEDKI (ECR, PL) AFET Urmas PAET (Renew, EE) David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) Auswärtige Angelegenheiten Sergei STANISHEV (S&D, BG) Željana ZOVKO (EPP, HR) Bernard GUETTA (Renew, FR) DROI Hannah NEUMANN (Greens/EFA, DE) Marie ARENA (S&D, BE) Menschenrechte Christian SAGARTZ (EPP, AT) Raphael GLUCKSMANN (S&D, FR) Nikos ANDROULAKIS (S&D, EL) SEDE Kinga GÁL (EPP, HU) Nathalie LOISEAU (RE, FR) Sicherheit und Verteidigung Özlem DEMIREL (GUE/NGL, DE) Lukas MANDL (EPP, AT) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (Greens/EFA, DE) DEVE Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE) Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) Entwicklung Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU (RE, FR) Erik MARQUARDT (Greens/EFA, DE) Seite 1 14.01.2021 Jan ZAHRADIL (ECR, CZ) INTA Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) Bernd LANGE (S&D, DE) Internationaler Handel Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU (EPP, EL) Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE (RE, FR) Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) BUDG Oliver CHASTEL (RE, BE) Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR, BE) Haushalt Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) Niclas HERBST (EPP, DE) Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) CONT Caterina CHINNICI (S&D, IT) Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) Haushaltskontrolle Martina DLABAJOVÁ (RE, CZ) Tamás DEUTSCH (EPP, HU) Luděk NIEDERMAYER
  • 2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups

    2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups

    2019 European Elections The weight of the electorates compared to the electoral weight of the parliamentary groups Guillemette Lano Raphaël Grelon With the assistance of Victor Delage and Dominique Reynié July 2019 2019 European Elections. The weight of the electorates | Fondation pour l’innovation politique I. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE WEIGHT OF ELECTORATES AND THE ELECTORAL WEIGHT OF PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS The Fondation pour l’innovation politique wished to reflect on the European elections in May 2019 by assessing the weight of electorates across the European constituency independently of the electoral weight represented by the parliamentary groups comprised post-election. For example, we have reconstructed a right-wing Eurosceptic electorate by aggregating the votes in favour of right-wing national lists whose discourses are hostile to the European Union. In this case, for instance, this methodology has led us to assign those who voted for Fidesz not to the European People’s Party (EPP) group but rather to an electorate which we describe as the “populist right and extreme right” in which we also include those who voted for the Italian Lega, the French National Rally, the Austrian FPÖ and the Sweden Democrats. Likewise, Slovak SMER voters were detached from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Group and instead categorised as part of an electorate which we describe as the “populist left and extreme left”. A. The data collected The electoral results were collected list by list, country by country 1, from the websites of the national parliaments and governments of each of the States of the Union. We then aggregated these data at the European level, thus obtaining: – the number of individuals registered on the electoral lists on the date of the elections, or the registered voters; – the number of votes, or the voters; – the number of valid votes in favour of each of the lists, or the votes cast; – the number of invalid votes, or the blank or invalid votes.
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections

    Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections

    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
  • 5G Observatory Quarterly Report 5

    5G Observatory Quarterly Report 5

    5G Observatory Quarterly Report 5 Up to September 2019 A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by: 5G Observatory – Quarterly Report #5 This study was carried out for the European Commission by IDATE DigiWorld Authors: Frédéric PUJOL, Carole MANERO and Santiago REMIS 90013 – October 2019 Internal identification Contract number: LC-00838363 SMART number 2019/009 DISCLAIMER By the European Commission, Directorate-General of Communications Networks, Content & Technology. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. © European Union, 2019. All rights reserved. Certain parts are licensed under conditions to the EU. www.idate.org © IDATE DigiWorld 2019 – p. 2 5G Observatory – Quarterly report #5 Contents 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 6 Status of 5G deployment in Europe and assessment against the 5G Action Plan..................................................... 6 5G deployment outside Europe .............................................................................................................................. 7 Framework conditions and
  • Ensuring Election Integrity to Achieve Stability and Prevent Conflicts

    Ensuring Election Integrity to Achieve Stability and Prevent Conflicts

    Ensuring election integrity to achieve stability and prevent conflicts Special Political and Decolonisation Committee 1. Introduction Elections are one of the cornerstones of democracy. Considering that they empower people to participate actively in the formation of their political reality, protecting and promoting their integrity is therefore a top policy priority. Unfortunately, troubled electoral processes and their fall-out have challenged the credibility of democracy in recent years, thus leading to political instability. On the other hand, elections that are recognized as free and fair result in a peaceful transition of power. Without electoral integrity, leaders and officials lack accountability to the public, confidence in the election results is weak and the government lacks necessary legitimacy. Electoral integrity allows for peaceful resolution of conflict, open dialogue, debate, and information sharing amongst leaders and the public. Ultimately, the responsibility of protecting and promoting the integrity of elections falls on national stakeholders. In doing so, states not only pass legislation, set up institutions, or draw up codes of conduct and other enforcement mechanisms at the national level, but also commit themselves to regional and international principles of democracy. Up until now, that task has been completed with varying levels of success and so the question remains: how can election integrity be ensured both universally and consistently? 2. Terminology Electoral integrity: Any election that is based on the democratic principles of universal suffrage and political equality as reflected in international standards and agreements, and is professional, impartial, and transparent in its preparation and administration throughout the electoral cycle. Voting/Electoral system: Equipment, materials, and documentation used to conduct elections, including capturing votes, count votes, and generate reports.
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences

    Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences

    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
  • It-Tlettax-Il Leġiżlatura Pl

    It-Tlettax-Il Leġiżlatura Pl

    IT-TLETTAX-IL LEĠIŻLATURA P.L. 730 Dokument imqiegħed fuq il-Mejda tal-Kamra tad-Deputati fis-Seduta Numru 55 tal-21 ta’ Novembru 2017 mid-Deputat Prim Ministru u Ministru għas-Saħħa, f’isem il-Prim Ministru. ___________________________ Raymond Scicluna Skrivan tal-Kamra ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Published in 2017 by the Broadcasting Authority 7 Mile End Road Ħamrun HMR 1718 Malta Compiled, produced and designed by: Mario Axiak B.A. Hons (Business Management), M.B.A. (Maastricht) Head Research & Communications The Hon. Dr Joseph Muscat KUOM, Ph.D., M.P Prime Minister Office of the Prime Minister Auberge De Castille Valletta June 2017 Honourable Prime Minister, Broadcasting Authority Annual Report 2016 In accordance with sub-article (1) of article 30 of the Broadcasting Act, Chapter 350 of the Laws of Malta, we have pleasure in forwarding the Broadcasting Authority’s Annual Report for 2016. Yours sincerely, ______________________________ ______________________________ Ms Tanya Borg Cardona Dr Joanna Spiteri Chairperson Chief Executive BROADCASTING AUTHORITY MALTA ANNUAL REPORT 2016 CONTENTS 1. Review of the Year 7 1.1 The Broadcasting Authority 7 1.2 Għargħur Transmitting Facilities 7 1.3 Sponsorship - Certificate Course in Proof Reading 7 1.4 Sponsorship - Malta Journalism Awards 8 1.5 Thematic Reports compiled by the Monitoring Department 8 1.6 Reach-out 8 1.7 Political Broadcasts 9 1.8 Equality Certification 9 1.9 Wear it Pink 9 2. Administrative Offences 11 3. Broadcasting Licences 13 3.1 Radio Broadcasting Licences 13 3.1.1 Community Radio Stations 13 3.1.2 Drive-In Cinema Event 13 3.1.3 Nationwide Analogue Radio (FM/AM) 13 3.1.4 Digital Radio Platform 13 3.1.5 Request for a Medium Wave Radio Station 13 3.2 Nationwide Television and Satellite Stations 13 3.2.1 Television Stations 13 3.2.2 Satellite Licences 15 4.