DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan, 1999 to 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan, 1999 to 2020 COMPREHENSIVE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN COOKEVILLE, TENNESSEE 1999 - 2020 PREPARED AND APPROVED BY THE COOKEVILLE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Carolyn Meyer, Chairman Harold Jackson, Councilman Vern Crabtree Jim Dickinson Jerry Newport Larry Nunn Mike Patterson William Patterson Jim Stafne September 25, 2000 ADOPTED BY THE COOKEVILLE CITY COUNCIL Dr. Charles Womack, Mayor Richard Grogan, Vice-Mayor Dr. Steve Copeland Dwight Henry Harold Jackson Jim Shipley, City Manager October 5, 2000 ASSISTED BY THE COOKEVILLE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CODES Jeff Littrell, Director James Mills, City Planner Terry Clark, Planning Technician COOKEVILLE COMPREHENSIVE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose of Plan....................................................................................................................1 Delineation of Planning Area...............................................................................................1 Scope of Plan.......................................................................................................................1 Community Goals, Process and Methodologies ..................................................................2 Companion Planning Document ..........................................................................................2 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND FOR PLANNING Introduction..........................................................................................................................3 Location and Size .........................................................................................................3 Early Settlement............................................................................................................3 Major Events Affecting Development ..........................................................................5 Governmental Structure .......................................................................................................6 Municipal-Regional Planning Commission..................................................................6 Municipal Finances.......................................................................................................8 Summary of Findings.........................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 3 NATURAL FACTORS AFFECTING DEVELOPMENT Introduction........................................................................................................................11 Climate...............................................................................................................................11 Air Quality and Water Resources ......................................................................................11 Topography........................................................................................................................13 Drainage and Flooding.......................................................................................................14 Soils and Geology..............................................................................................................15 Summary of Findings.........................................................................................................20 CHAPTER 4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING DEVELOPMENT Introduction........................................................................................................................22 Trends Summary................................................................................................................22 Population..........................................................................................................................22 Employment.......................................................................................................................26 Summary of Findings.........................................................................................................29 Cookeville Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan Page ii PAGE CHAPTER 5 EXISTING LAND USE ANALYSIS Introduction........................................................................................................................30 Existing Land Use Inventory.............................................................................................30 General Analysis of Existing Land Use.............................................................................32 Analysis of Existing Developed Land Use ........................................................................33 Residential..................................................................................................................34 Commercial/Private Services......................................................................................38 Industrial.....................................................................................................................39 Public, Cultural, Recreational.....................................................................................40 Utilities .......................................................................................................................41 Transportation.............................................................................................................48 Vacant Land Analysis ........................................................................................................49 Analysis of Existing Land Use by Zoning.........................................................................52 Summary of Findings.........................................................................................................53 CHAPTER 6 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING LAND USE BY PLANNING NEIGHBORHOODS Introduction........................................................................................................................54 Existing Land Use by Planning Neighborhoods................................................................54 Neighborhood One......................................................................................................54 Neighborhood Two .....................................................................................................58 Neighborhood Three...................................................................................................58 Neighborhood Four.....................................................................................................59 Neighborhood Five .....................................................................................................59 Neighborhood Six.......................................................................................................60 Neighborhood Seven..................................................................................................60 Neighborhood Eight....................................................................................................61 Neighborhood Nine ....................................................................................................61 Summary of Findings.........................................................................................................62 CHAPTER 7 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS AND PLAN Introduction........................................................................................................................63 Analysis of Transportation System....................................................................................63 Classification of Thoroughfares .................................................................................63 Traffic Circulation Patterns ........................................................................................65 Traffic Volumes..........................................................................................................65 Traffic Impediments ...................................................................................................67 Traffic Generators.......................................................................................................68 Existing Street Conditions ..........................................................................................69 Parking........................................................................................................................71 Air/Rail/Port ...............................................................................................................71 Mass Transit................................................................................................................71 Pedestrian/Non-Vehicular Circulation........................................................................72 Future Transportation Plan.................................................................................................74 Land Use Regulations .................................................................................................74 Major Street Plan........................................................................................................74 Street Improvements Plan...........................................................................................78 Pedestrian Circulation Plan.........................................................................................78 Cookeville Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan Page iii PAGE CHAPTER 8 DELINEATION OF URBAN GROWTH AREA Introduction........................................................................................................................81
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DRAFT for Public Comment
    US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision Nashville District Center Hill Lake Center Hill Lake Master Plan Revision DRAFT for Public Comment April 2018 Draft for Stakeholder Review 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision Nashville District Center Hill Lake This page is left intentionally blank Draft for Public Comment 2 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision Nashville District Center Hill Lake U.S Army Corps of Engineers, Center Hill Lake Master Plan Revision Commonly Used Acronyms and Abbreviations AAR – After Action Review Sensitive Area AREC – Agriculture Research and Education FOIA – Freedom of Information Act Center FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact ARPA – Archeological Resources Protection Act FRM – Flood Risk Management ASA(CW) – Assistant Secretary of the Army for FY – Fiscal Year Civil Works GIS - Geographic Information Systems ATR - Agency Technical Review GPS – Global Positioning System BMP - Best Management Practice GOES – Geostationary Operational CE-DASLER – Corps of Engineers Data Environmental Satellite Management & Analysis System for Lakes, H&H – Hydrology and Hydraulics Estuaries, and Rivers HABS – Harmful Algal Blooms cfs – Cubic Feet per Second HQUSACE – Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps of COL – Colonel Engineers CONUS – Continental United States IRRM – Interim Risk Reduction Measures COP – Community of Practice IWR – Institute for Water Resources CRM – Cumberland River Mile LEED – Leadership in Energy and Environmental CW – Civil Works Design CWA – Clean Water Act, 1977 LRN – Nashville
    [Show full text]
  • Adventure Tourism Plan for Mcminnville - Warren County, Tennessee Adventure Tourism Plan for Mcminnville - Warren County
    Adventure Tourism Plan for McMinnville - Warren County, Tennessee Adventure Tourism Plan for McMinnville - Warren County March 13, 2018 PREPARED BY Ryan Maloney, P.E., LEED-AP Kevin Chastine, AICP PREPARED FOR McMinnville-Warren County Chamber of Commerce City of McMinnville, Tennessee Warren County, Tennessee Acknowledgments The authors of this Adventure Tourism Plan would CITY OF MCMINNVILLE like to thank the City of McMinnville, Warren County, Mayor - Jimmy Haley and the McMinnville-Warren County Chamber of Commerce for its foresight and support in the WARREN COUNTY development of this plan. Also, we would like to County Executive - Herschel Wells thank the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development for funding through MCMINNVILLE-WARREN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE a2016 Tourism Enhancement Grant. Additionally, President - Mandy Eller we would like to thank the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Tennessee State Board of Directors Parks, and the Tennessee Department of Tourism Scott McCord - Chairman Development for their contributions to tourism Autumn Turner - Chair-Elect both regionally and statewide. Finally, we would like Leann Cordell - Secretary-Treasurer to thank City and County leaders, business owners, Shannon Gulick - Immediate Past Chair entrepreneurs, and residents who provided invaluable Craig Norris information through participating in the visioning Waymon Hale session. Rita Ramsey Dayron Deaton Sheri Denning John Chisam Jan Johnson Carlene Brown Anne Vance Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
    [Show full text]
  • "Just Mention Electricity and the Most Humdrum Citizen Immediately
    "Just mention electricity and the most humdrum citizen immediately becomes a poet, and when we think of it, there is no other servamt of humanity that performs so many useful duties for us." Towards an understanding of the history and material culture of Pre-TVA Hydroelectric Development in Tennessee, 1900 - 1933. PART I. By James B. Jones, Jr. The technology and design of electrical systems and the institutions formed to administer them matured together. In his book Networks of Power, Thomas P. Hughes, perhaps the foremost historian of the field, reveals three stages in the development of light and power in the United States from roughly 1890 to 1930. Varying with small differences in detail, the evolution of Tennessee's electrical supply system before the advent of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) correspond to the delineations Hughes discerns. This is not to suggest, however, that the evolution of hydroelectric power generation occurred in a lock-step manner, o- ne phase leading inevitably, logically and instantaneously to the next in an orderly, chronological procession of pre-ordained events. Indeed, development was more spasmodic as circumscribed by the temporal limits of this narrative. The main characteristic of the first stage was the emergence of low voltage, small, direct current (d.c.) lighting companies. As the forerunner of the contemporary electrical utility industry, these centrally located hydroelectric plants supplied light and electricity only to nearby municipalities. Because such low-voltage d.c. systems as these could serve only the small geographic areas to which they were confined by want of future developments in long distance electrical transmission, the number, not the size, of hydroelectric plants grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Chemical Examination of the Waters in Tennessee Streams
    FIELD CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF THE WATERS IN TENNESSEE STREAMS CHARLES S. SHOUP Department of Biology, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee Reprinted from the JOURNAL OE THE TENNESSEE ACADEMY OE SCIENCE, Volume XXV, Number 1, January, 1950. FIELD CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF THE WATERS IN TENNESSEE STREAMS' CHARLES S. SHOUP Department of Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee INTRODUCTION Fresh-water biology is a relatively new field of investigation in the southern United States, particularly in connection with fisheries re- sources and potential fish production. In the country as a whole such studies began only a little more than a half-century ago, and date from pioneer work on the Great Lakes and the important examina- tions made of the Illinois River system by S. A. Forbes (1877, 1893, 1911, 1928) with varied studies in other regions. The work of E. A. Birge and Chancy J uday (1904, 1907, 1910, 1914) on Wisconsin lakes beginning almost with the new century and of J. E. Reighard (1894) in Michigan and of C. A. Kofoid (1903) in Illinois initiated recognition of the importance of knowledge regarding biological bal- ance in fresh waters, the maintenance of which pays dividends in fishable streams and sometimes in marketable fish flesh. These studies of the general water chemistry from Tennessee streams were begun in 1938 as a part of the biological survey work which was at that time being conducted by the Tennessee Department of Conservation, Division of Game and Fish, and which ended as a state-supported enterprise in the summer of 1941. Since the war the additional supplemental and confirmatory information contained in this report has been obtained by the author, and is now offered as a contribution to support the previously-published papers which have resulted from the efforts of the first biological survey in Tennessee (Shoup, 1940; Shoup and Peyton, 1940; Shoup, Peyton, and Gen- try, 1941 ; Gentry, 1941 ; Hobbs and Shoup, 1942; Shoup, 1943; Wright and Shoup, 1945; Shoup, 1947).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use and Transportation Policy Plan
    LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY PLAN PUTNAM COUNTY, TENNESSEE 2004-2024 PREPARED BY THE PUTNAM COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Greg Brown, Chairman Ronnie Lafever Bill Bennett Dan Turnbow Gary Carwile J. Richard Wright Jim Martin ASSISTED BY THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UPPER CUMBERLAND REGION LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE OFFICE 2004 RESOLUTION OF THE PUTNAM COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE PUTNAM COUNTY LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY PLAN, 2004-2024 WHEREAS, recognizing that it is the function and duty of a regional planning commission to make and adopt a general plan for the physical development of the municipality, including outside of the corporate limits; and WHEREAS, the Putnam County Regional Planning Commission has completed a study and prepared a general plan for the purpose of guiding and accomplishing a coordinated, adjusted, efficient and economically sound means of development for Putnam County; and WHEREAS, the Putnam County Land Use and Transportation Policy Plan, 2004-2024, with accompanying maps, charts, and descriptive matter, will best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity, and welfare of the inhabitants, as well as efficiency and economy in the process of development, in accordance with present and future needs and resources; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PUTNAM COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION that pursuant to Section 13-4-202 of the Tennessee Code, the Putnam County Land Use and Transportation Policy Plan, 2004-2024 is hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of said plan be subsequently certified to the legislative body of Putnam County. APPROVED: __________________________________ _________________ Secretary, Putnam County Regional Date Planning Commission ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for Proposed Center Hill Master Plan
    Nashville District ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Proposed Master Plan Revision Center Hill Lake May 22, 2018 For Further Information, Contact: Travis A. Wiley U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nashville District 110 9th Ave South, Room A-405 Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Telephone: (615) 736-7958 PROPOSED MASTER PLAN REVISION CENTER HILL LAKE MASTER PLAN REVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 5 2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ................................................................................ 7 3 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Implementation of Proposed MP Revision .................................................................. 7 3.2 No Action ....................................................................................................................... 8 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ...................... 8 4.1 Project History and Setting ........................................................................................... 8 4.2 Climate, Physiography, Topography, Geology, and Soils ........................................ 11 4.2.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................... 11 4.2.2 Implementation of Proposed MP Revision ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caney Fork River Watershed (05130108) of the Cumberland River Basin
    CANEY FORK RIVER WATERSHED (05130108) OF THE CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION 2003 Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes. AFO. Animal Feeding Operation. Ambient Sites. Those sites established for long term instream monitoring of water quality. ARAP. Aquatic Resource Alteration Permit. Assessment. The result of an analysis of how well streams meet the water quality criteria assigned to them. Bankfull Discharge. The momentary maximum peak flow before a stream overflows its banks onto a floodplain. Basin. An area that drains several smaller watersheds to a common point. Most watersheds in Tennessee are part of the Cumberland, Mississippi, or Tennessee Basin (The Conasauga River and Barren River Watersheds are the exceptions).
    [Show full text]
  • Turbidity, Transparency, and Habitat in Tennessee Streams
    Proceedings from the Virtual 2021 Tennessee Water Resources Symposium Sponsored by: Tennessee Section of the American Water Resources Association In cooperation with the Planning Committee . David Blackwood, West Tennessee River . Daniel Saint, Tennessee Valley Authority Basin Authority . Scott Schoefernacker, CAESER . Mary Bruce, Nashville Metro Water Services . John Schwartz, UT, Civil & Environmental Engineering . Paul Davis, Cumberland River Compact Board of Directors . Dana Waits, Wood, PLC . Jennifer Dodd, TNAWRA President/TDEC, . Forbes Walker, UT, Biosystems Engineering & Division of Water Resources Soil Sciences . Alfred Kalyanapu, Tennessee . Sherry Wang, TDEC, Division of Water Technological University Resources . Deedee Kathman, TNAWRA Secretary . Adrian Ward, Barge Design Solutions, Inc. Tom Lawrence, TLE, PLLC . Lori Weir, TNAWRA Membership Chairperson/USGS . Andrea Ludwig, University of Tennessee . Mike Williams, Stantec . Ingrid Luffman, TNAWRA President- Elect/ETSU, Geosciences . William J. Wolfe, TNAWRA Past President /USGS, ret. Regan McGahen, TNAWRA Treasurer/TDEC-Division of Water Resources Cover Design by Amy Hill, Center for the Management, Utilization & Protection of Water Resources, Tennessee Technological University with photo courtesy of Alan Cressler, U.S. Geological Survey i 2019-2021 TN AWRA OFFICERS o President and Jennifer Dodd Symposium Chair TDEC, Division of Water Resources 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 11th Floor Nashville, TN 37243 Phone: (615) 532-0643 Email: [email protected] o President-Elect Ingrid Luffman East Tennessee State University Geosciences, Ingrid Luffman PO Box 70357 Johnson City, TN 37614-1710 Phone: (423) 439-7551 Email: [email protected] o Past President Bill Wolfe 640 Grassmere Park, Suite 100 Nashville, TN 37211 Phone: (615) 837-4731 Email: [email protected] o Treasurer Regan McGahen TDEC, Division of Water Resources 312 Rosa L.
    [Show full text]
  • Burgess Falls State Natural Area
    NPS Form 10-900 . 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) i »J United States Department of the Interior .1 w Li U 'J Ib National Park Service National Register of Historic Places JUH 011990' Registration Form NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Burgess Falls Hydroelectric. other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number Hwv 135 and Fa 1.1 ing Watar Ri vpr/Rurgp RS Fallc: q N A t/ ^not for publication city, town Gookeville -xl vicinity state Tennessee code TN county Putnam code zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local H district ____ buildings l~Xl public-State EH site ____ sites I I public-Federal [~~] structure 5 structures I I object ____ objects 5 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously Pre-TVA Hydroelectric Development in TN, 1901-1933 listed in the National Register 0_____ 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Algood SR-42 Project: Report on Phase II Excavations in Putnam County, Tennessee
    The Algood SR-42 Project Report on Phase II Excavations in Putnam County, Tennessee Sarah A. Levithol, Michael C. Moore, and W. Steven Spears The Algood SR-42 Project: Report on Phase II Excavations in Putnam County, Tennessee Sarah A. Levithol, Michael C. Moore, and W. Steven Spears Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology Report of Investigations No. 18 2015 Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 2nd floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867- 7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 22nd floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-866-253-5827. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service (1-800-848-0298). ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flow Duration and Low Flows of Tennessee Streams Through 1992
    Flow Duration and Low Flows of Tennessee Streams through 1992 By GEORGE S. OUTLAW and JESS D. WEAVER U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4293 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION and the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Nashville, Tennessee 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm name in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center 810 Broadway, Suite 500 Open-File Reports Section Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Previous studies..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supplied Industrial Water Withdrawals in Tennessee--Part B
    WATER-RESOURCES INITESTIGATIONS REPORT 84-40`'4 DROUGHT-RELATED IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL AND MAJOR SELF- SUPPLIED INDUSTRIAL WATER WITHDRAWALS IN TENNESSEE--PART B Prepared by U . S . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY in cooperation with TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Division of Water Management TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Office of Natural Resources and Economic Development, Division of Air and Water Resources, Regional UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN Basin Descript ion The Tennessee part of the Upper Cumberland River basin covers 5,505 mil of land and water area and consists of all or parts of the following tributary basins as delineated by the U .S . Geological Survey and the Tennessee Depart­ ment of Water Management in 1982 . Tributary Tennessee basin No . Basin drainage area (fig . 8) description (square miles) 1 Clear Fork and Jellico Creek from head­ 318 waters to Tennessee-Kentucky State line . 2A New River and Clear Fork from headwaters 679 t o confluence . 2B South Fork Cumberland River from confluence 299 New River and Clear Fork t o Tennessee- Kentucky State line . 3A East and West Forks Obey River from head- 413 waters t o mouth . 3B Obey River from confluence of East and 369 West Forks to Tennessee-Kentucky State line . 4A Cumberland River and minor tributaries from 795 below the Obey River to above Caney Fork . 4B Cumberland River and minor tributaries between 33 the Tennessee-Kentucky State line and the Obey River . 5A Caney Fork above Great Falls Dam, excluding 885 Collins River . 5B Collins River 791 5C Caney Fork from Great Falls Dam to mouth 909 47 Yellow Creek above Tennessee-Kentucky 14 State line .
    [Show full text]