The Or. Taylorco

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Or. Taylorco THE MORNING OREGONIAN, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1907. 3 the election last June The Oregonlan very energetically condemned franchise-grabber- s REBEL EDITOR ESCAPES HOUSE VOTE and the iniquitous gas company and pro- posed radical measures, well fitting a great MONOPOLY! FOR COMPETITION! ill independent newspaper. I remember, too, DISEASE! FOR HEALTHY MEATS! the efforts made by your paper to enforce Fit any (tee or style head. BATTLING FIGHTING upon candidates such pledges as would bind VILLAItEAL GIVES IMMIGRATION FOR GOVERNMENT INSPECTION! ON SHIP SUBSIDY our office-seekin- g friends and would Insure FILTH! their voting (if elected) for popular meas- OFFICERS SLIP. ures. I remember, too, that these efforts of The Oregonlan were more or less suc- Competition is the life-bloo- d of trade the red corpuscles that surge thru the veins of Business and keep cessful and many Republican candidates Imposes on Confidence of Guard and (it strong and healthy. Competition protects the wage-earn- er from high prices. Competition provides the pledged themselves to vote and work for table of the laborer with the viands of the banker. Encourage competition. Stand with the Harry Wood such measured as would give our people Suddenly Disappears While on Adopts Special Rule Fixing some relief from the Portland, Gas Com- Store in its fight against Monopoly and high prices. , . pany and curb, to some extent, the other Way to Mexico. Time for Final Aption perpetual franchises of our city. - Then, too, I am reminded that practi- DAY cally every Democratic candidate for the EL PASO Tex., Feb. 25. Somewhere in THE OTHER DAY THE SAME on the Bill. pledged him- Legislature myself included El Paso or in the mountains around, se- fresh, self to practically every measure advocated curely hidden from a large force of A wagonload of meat came dragging into town A clean and sanitary refrigerator car of juicy, by The Oregonlan. To the ordinary voter Is from a trip several miles over dusty roads;' the tender, GOVERNMENT-INSPECTE- D MEATS ar- puzzling United States officers that diligently of it might have become extremely searching for him, is Antonio L. Villa-rea- l, 14 away. to distinguished these oppos- meats were covered with a dirty burlap that had rived here from a point miles Freshly have between editor of the revolutionary organ, filthy, OREGON. The was ing candidates or discover some worthy "Regeneration." and head of the St.i served on similar trips many times; killed and dressed in car MIDDLE STATES OPPOSED difference. Louis of Mexican revolutionists, ' and reeking with germs gathered along the way scrubbed clean and shining, sweet as the housewife's however, might noticed Junta This, have been who has been in prison here under J since time immemorial. No to say load private refrigerator, nicely iced and tempting as a every candidate pro- need that nearly Democratic charges pending Deiore ootn tne uniteo. was uninspected by any health officer. dish of strawberries and cream. Those meats came to claimed himself, at every opportunity af- States Department of Justice and the Look as gtxxl behind as in front. forded him, to be the firm exponent of the Department of Labor and Commerce, and As excellent quality inside as out, WHO GOT THOSE MEATS? THE HARRY WOOD MARKET .Democrats Are Joined by 24 Repub- reforms he advocated, whereas the Repub- whose fight against extradition and Standard ox bat ysUuo that's licans, once winning the nominations, were death in Mexico has attracted widespread licans Against Rule Grosvenor satisfied to let the immense Republican ma- attention. WHICH MEATS DID. YOU GET ON YOUR TABLE? jority win them their election, and said Villareal been before United States Makes Closing Speech in. little or nothing further. has McKibbin many Commissioner Howe today for a hearing ANT GOOD DEALER prices, you too Harry prices. piece I remember having spent evenings on the two charges of being in the United $3 If you paid more than these paid much. These are Wood's Not a of Defense of Graft. in halls and on street corners proclaiming Look out of Beef." pledging, States in violation of laws of neutrality 'Bull Beef" in this market. for that carload "Bull jny stand on public questions and and of being here in violation of Im- every means in my power the if elected, to use migration The case was dis- Loin Veal Cutlets proper legislation. laws. first Prime Rib Roast Beef..l0 Corned Beef 6 15 for missed he was remanded to jail U I was chairman of the committee of leg- and Sirloin Steak. Oxtails, per pound. 5 Rib Veal Cutlets 12' , under the second charge, now on appeal 12J2 of - WASHINGTON-- Feb. 25. Ship subsidy islative candidates to draft a platform, and before Department at Washington. Choice Brisket Beef... 4 Lers Pork 12- ERRATA . through of the Small Porterhouse 6pcured a marked Impetus today In the In presenting, it the columns On the way to he permission Beef Necks to Boil Pork Chops The Oregonlan I distinguished between our Jail asked 4 12' Thru an error House, which. Just before adjournment, fo send a telegram, and was allowed to part of lota 1 and 2, block 2, Far-- 'Fancy Porterhouse Beef to Stew Pork Loin Roast in promises and the somewhat similar prom- '. 4 15c vostcrday's adopted a rule that will probably Insure enter the telegraph office, wJile Inter- rell's Add. to Woodlawn 1 Steak Beef Shoul-ri- r the passage of for ises of the Republican candidates by stat- Geo. G. and Leona Root to Mathea Beef Tripe 8 Pork Steak 15 al. the Uttauer substitute would preter Antonio Sierra, who had him in Backle. west y, of lot 1 west V, - "T"-Bon- Steak and ing "the Democrats, if elected, Schu-mack- and e Side the Senate bill and before that charge, Inspector er of 10 Fancy Sf.l2V Beef Kidneys 5 Pork 12V result the deliver the goods." What the Democrats and Immigrant north feet of lot 2. block 12, Href Shoulder final adjournment in positive legislation. Villa-re- al Dolan's Add. .. Shoulder Roast was quot- Is of stood in front of the door. J Rolled Rib Roast: 10 Beef Brains. 10 Pork Roast.121 The rule was reported by Dalzell in the would have done if elected a matter telegram, walked out Augusta H. Gove to Anna Heward and ed at 12M.C, Republican Legisla- sent the the Samuel F. Heward, 2, 97, Beef Rib Steak Veal Shanks for Broth. Pork Mixed Sausage.. 10 shape of a resolution providing conjecture; what the dodged alley dis- lot block 12 6 should have that the tors of Multnomah County did is public his- front door, into an and Stephens' Add 2,500 Veal Stewing; . Pork Hocks S horn Rolled compromise bill shall be considered, with appeared. Ethel TJhl and T. Hartt Gardner to Loin Steak 10 for 8 T; tory. ' It 4s extremely doubtful whether the Nellie Pigs' Rib Roast IOC. debate limited to five hours, and that worse. Might Every immigration officer and others Gulsnesa et al., west 60 feet of Best Round Steak..... 8 Breast of Veal... 10 Feet 5 of the final vote shall be taken not later Democrats could have done city lot , block 279, Aiken's Add .... 1,800 insteadc; they. not have dene better? in the have searched unceasingly Portland Trust Co. of Oregon to F. Beef Shoulder Steak... 7 Veal Rump Roast. ...12V2 Leaf Lard 12V. 12 than next Friday afternoon at 3 o'clock. for him since, without discovering the Tompkins, L RViun ilBestSteak In taking a prospective view of the mat- lot 2, block 133, Wood- Beef Shoulder Roast... 7& Leg Roast of Veal. V Pickle Pork 12' 2 The rule was adopted by a vote of 158 slightest trace of him. is believed stock . 300 ..12 Instead of ter, I am wondering If it Is not possible It that 8S1 2 to 122, 24 Republicans voting with the he is being concealed by local revolution- Nancy A. Taylor to L. F. Tompkins Pot Roast Beef Shoulder Roast Veal...lO Delicious Breakfast i c; that partisan politics be enough eliminated and wife, south y, of lot 1, block .Roast BeefPotis Democrats in opposition to the rule. bearing ists, and that they will aid him to make 124, Rump Roast Beef Loin Roast Veal 15 Bacon 17' Sc. The was agreed upon unexpect- to allow the election of some men Woodstock 150 7C not rule names of a minority party, but honest good his escape. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. to Lewell Hamburger Steak Rib Roast Veal 12V2 Hams ...17 edly by the rules committee at a meet- Smith, lot 10. block 20, S. St. Johns 250 8J enough to do what they are elected to do. Catharine ing held after the visit of Secretary Root party names do separate, and with Gardner to Edmond B Capitol, gener- Though Securing Jury in Murder Case. Gardner, undivided 3 of N. B. of SPECIAL PRICES GIVEN TO HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS to the and it was very Senatorship of Sec. 9, ally the United States out the also E. y, of S. B. M. and S. understood that the Administration way, why, not elect men striving with all CULPEPPER, Va., Feb. 25. Efforts are W. 14 of S. E. and lot 6. of Sec. was responsible for the committee's ac- - being secure to try 4. T. 2 N., R. 1 w ' soul and might for principles recog- made today to a jury .J tlon. their the Strothers brothers, charged with the The Hawthorne Estate to Elizabeth nized by all parties as Ju?t and needful? Parclius.
Recommended publications
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • LWCF Projects 1964 to 2019
    FiscalYear CountyName AgencyName ProjectNumber ProjectName ProjectScope GrantAmount ProjectAddress ProjectCity ProjectZipCod Latitude Longitude e 2018/19 Kern City of Bakersfield 06-01827 Kaiser Permanente Construct 4 new football fields, a restroom and concession $3,000,000 9001 Ashe Road Bakersfield 93313 NULL NULL Sports Village stand, exercise outdoor gym area, 3 parking lots, Project installation of sports field lighting, and landscaping at the Kaiser Permanente Sports Village in the City of Bakersfield. 2018/19 Humboldt City of Eureka 06-01826 Sequoia Park Construct new trails, playground facilities, off-street ADA $1,525,000 3414 W Street Eureka 95503 NULL NULL Redwood Canopy compliant parking and new restrooms and renovate trails Walk and Trail in Sequoia Park in the City of Eureka. Project 2018/19 Riverside City of Indio 06-0130 South Jackson Park Construct a new approximately 0.5 mile trail with exercise $652,500 83100 Date Indio 92201 NULL NULL Accessibility stations and plant approximately 50 new trees, renovate Avenue Improvements existing playgrounds and provide ADA improvements at South Jackson Park in the City of Indio. 2018/19 Los Angeles City of Long Beach 06-01828 Davenport Park Construct a new multi-use sports field, shaded outdoor $2,016,000 2910 East 55th Long Beach 90805 NULL NULL Phase II seating area, and install exercise equipment with signage Way in Davenport Park in the City of Long Beach. 2018/19 Madera County of Madera 06-01829 Courthouse Park Construct a new playground, exercise stations, and picnic $203,747 210 W. Yosemite Madera 93637 NULL NULL Project area at Courthouse Park in the City of Madera.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Pilot Program Evaluation 2 (1)
    Portland Ecodistrict Pilot Program Evaluation Report of Findings FEBRUARY 2015 © 2015 EcoDistricts. All Rights Reserved 1223 SW Washington St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97205 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Background 7 Beyond the Portland Pilot 10 Pilot Evaluations 11 South of Market 12 South Waterfront 22 Foster-Green (Lents) 32 Gateway 44 Lloyd 52 Lessons Learned 60 Appendix 64 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Through the support of the Bullitt Foundation, EcoDistricts undertook an evaluation of the Portland Ecodistrict Pilot program, a three-year partnership between the City of Portland, Portland Development Commission (PDC) and Portland Sustainability Institute (PoSI) to accelerate sustainable neighborhood-scale projects in five districts throughout Portland between 2009 and 2012. The City selected the five following districts to participate in the program in order to promote sustainability across a diverse set of neighborhood “typologies”: • Portland State University - South of Market Ecodistrict (“SoMa”) • North Macadam Urban Renewal Area - South Waterfront Ecodistrict • Lents Urban Renewal Area - Foster-Green Ecodistrict • Gateway Urban Renewal Area - Gateway Ecodistrict • Lloyd District - Lloyd Ecodistrict This evaluation is one element of a four-part Bullitt funded project to more deeply understand best practices for district and neighborhood sustainable development in the region. The four elements are: Portland Pilot program evaluation; analysis of neighborhood sustainability projects in the Cascadia Region; update of the EcoDistricts Protocol; and a technical guide for green infrastructure and ecosystem services. All four elements of this project have been designed to inform the development of the Global EcoDistricts Protocol and other EcoDistricts-initiated programs intended to accelerate district-scale sustainable development in the region and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland City Council Agenda
    CITY OF OFFICIAL PORTLAND, OREGON MINUTES A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON WAS HELD THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2003 AT 9:30 A.M. THOSE PRESENT WERE: Mayor Katz, Presiding; Commissioners Francesconi, Leonard, Saltzman and Sten, 5. Commissioner Leonard and Saltzman arrived at 9:33 a.m. Commissioner Leonard left at 10:23 a.m. and returned at 10:27 a.m. Commissioner Saltzman left at 10:38 a.m. and returned at 10:48 a.m. Commissioner Leonard left at 11:49 a.m. and returned at 11:55 a.m. Commissioner Saltzman left at 12:27 p.m. and returned at 12:34 p.m. OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE: Karla Moore-Love, Clerk of the Council; Harry Auerbach, Senior Deputy City Attorney; and Officer Michael Frome, Sergeant at Arms. At 12:45 p.m., Officer Curtis Chinn replaced Officer Frome, as Sergeant at Arms. On a Y-5 roll call, the Consent Agenda was adopted. Disposition: COMMUNICATIONS 773 Request of Annalisa Bandalera to address Council regarding Portland Peace Encampment (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 774 Request of Todd J. Kurylowicz to address Council regarding issues with the Mayor and Council (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 775 Request of Glenn Warren to address Council regarding Portland Peace Encampment (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 776 Request of Leonard Alexander to address Council regarding Portland Peace Encampment (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 777 Request of Andrew Seaton to address Council regarding Portland Peace Encampment (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 1 of 148 JULY 9, 2003 TIME CERTAINS 778 TIME CERTAIN: 9:30 AM – Adopt the recommendations in the Foster Transportation and Streetscape Plan (Resolution introduced by Commissioner Francesconi) 36158 (Y-5) 779 TIME CERTAIN: 10:30 AM – Accept report on the Police bureau community assessment survey (Report introduced by Mayor Katz) Motion to accept the Report: Moved by Commissioner Leonard and ACCEPTED seconded by Commissioner Saltzman.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Park System Development Charge 20-Year Capital Plan (Summary)
    187770 Exhibit A 2016 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funded with Park SDC revenue. The total value of projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), may be modified at any time. Changes to this list will not affect the SDC rates, unless the Council holds a public hearing and authorizes the changes, as provided in ORS 223.309(2). TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: Land acquisition Develop new parks on new land Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc Increase playability, durability and life of facilities Natural area restoration Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities SDC Zone Program Site Project Name % Growth Years 1 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 -10 Total 20 Years Total * Growth % Central City Acquisitions Central City Unidentified Central City Acquisitions 100% $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Central City Acquisition Placeholder Downtown 100%
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File Parks SDC Annual Report
    Park System Development Charge Annual Report 07/01/19 - 06/30/20 2019-20 Program to Date Park SDC Fees-Rev System 21,512,991.67 254,116,846.31 Leveraged Funds - Grants, Donations, Partner Funds, Loans 831,675.64 16,367,231.80 Interest on Investments and Loans 2,800,876.88 10,708,321.15 Bond Proceeds - OHRF Loan 0.00 959,100.00 Loan Proceeds - Waterleaf / Clatsop Butte Promissary Note 0.00 1,600,000.00 Loans Receivable - PCU Loan 0.00 350,000.00 Loans Receivable - OHRF Loan 0.00 991,598.57 Loans Receivable - Colwood Loan 170,250.00 340,500.00 Loans Receivable - Washington Park Parking Meters Loan 428,220.00 973,020.00 Loans Receivable - PIR Loan 0.00 250,000.00 Bond Proceeds from SDC Loan Payment Contract Sales 0.00 3,315,406.00 Bond Sales Line of Credit 0.00 6,000,000.00 Gross Revenue* 25,744,014.19 295,972,023.83 Administration & Compliance Costs 359,615.07 7,496,188.69 Net Revenue 25,384,399.12 288,475,835.14 Percent Administration & Compliance 1.42% 2.60% Fund Level Expenditures Investment - Waterleaf/ Clatsop Butte Promissary Note Repayment 0.00 1,612,266.36 Investment - PCU Loan 0.00 350,000.00 Investment - OHRF Loan 0.00 978,598.00 Investment - Washington Park Meters Loan 0.00 886,619.66 Investment - Colwood Golf Loan 0.00 1,135,000.00 Investment - PIR Loan 0.00 1,750,000.00 Debt Payments on OHRF loan 0.00 1,045,282.82 Debt Payments on Line of Credit 0.00 6,932,674.90 Total available for projects 273,785,393.40 Summary Expenditures by geographic-area ** 2019-20 Program to Date Central City 49,990.67 24,840,419.99 North 344,428.95 8,065,492.59 Northeast 682,939.40 22,636,440.02 Northwest 435,272.71 2,276,653.06 East 6,652,670.59 54,041,809.73 Southeast 2,618,469.14 6,666,279.91 Southwest 279,550.56 13,339,001.12 South**** 49,826.28 49,826.28 Citywide 494,621.65 615,571.07 Total Capital Expenditures 11,607,769.95 132,531,493.77 Fund Balance*** 141,253,899.63 * As of June 30, 2011, the combined Limited Tax Revenue bonds outstanding total is $0.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Water Conservation Fund Program Funded Projects
    Land and Water Conservation Fund Program Funded Projects Alameda County Alameda Creek Regional Park Alameda Creek-Coyote Hills Acquisition 1966/67 $819,997 Acquisition of 446 acres. Alameda Shoreline Park Alameda Shoreline Park 1978/79 $335,280 Picnic and play areas, trails. Alvarado Community Center Alvarado/Chavez Park Development 2001/02 $71,466 Development of a gazebo at Alvarado/Chavez Park to include renovated structure and new paint. Aquatic Park Aquatic Park Acquisition 1970/71 $24,633 Acquisition of 1.6 acre addition. Aquatic Park Development 1970/71 $154,581 Picnic areas, tot lot, roads, parking, irrigation, landscaping, and play fields. Aquatic Park Development 1976/77 $107,766 Play area, day camp, picnic area, landscaping, pathways. Ardenwood Park Ardenwood Regional Park Development 1983/84 $201,600 Development of access roads, parking, landscaping, restrooms, utilities and stabilization of farm buildings. Arroyo Swim Center Arroyo/Castro Valley Swim Development 1979/80 $81,280 Renovated swim pools at Castro Valley and Arroyo Swim Centers. Bateman Mall Park Bateman Park Development 1983/84 $37,800 Tot lot, lighting, irrigation, landscaping, paths. Big Break Regional Shoreline Vintage Parkway Creek Development 2003/04 $202,700 Development of a trail bridge across the Vintage Parkway Creek Channel. Caldecott Park Caldecott Park 1980/81 $202,400 Picnic areas, sports & play fields, trails, parking and restrooms. Caldecott Park Acquisition 1976/77 $151,756 57.1 acres acquired adjacent to the road for regional sports facility. Castro Valley Swim Center Arroyo/Castro Valley Swim Development 1979/80 $81,280 Renovated swim pools at Castro Valley and Arroyo Swim Centers. Centennial Park Centennial Park 1979/80 $165,408 Picnic areas, sports fields, play fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinance No
    AS AMENDED 5/18/16 Exhibit A substituted ORDINANCE NO. Amend Park System Development Charge Capital Improvements Plan to update the project list (Ordinance, amend Ordinance No. 187150) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Ordinance No. 172614, passed by the Council on August 19, 1998 authorized establishment of a Parks and Recreation System Development Charge (SDC) and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 2. In October 1998 the City established a Parks SDC program. City Code required that the program be updated every two years to ensure that programgoals were being met. An update was implemented on July 1, 2005 pursuant to Ordinance No. 179008, as amended. The required update reviewed the Parks SDC Program to determine that sufficientmoney will be available to fund capacity-increasing facilities identifiedby the Parks System Development Charge Capital Improvement Plan (Parks SDC-CIP); to determine whether the adopted and indexed SDC rate has kept pace with inflation; to determine whether the Parks SDC-CIP should be modified; and to ensure that SDC receipts will not over-fund such facilities. 3. Ordinance No. 181669, passed by the Council on March 12, 2008 updated Parks and Recreation System Development Charge, increased the calculated Park SDC recovery rate to 75%, established a Non-Residential Parks SDC fee, and implemented a two tiered SDC feestructure consisting of the Central City and the non-Central City areas, and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 4. Ordinance No. 187150, passed by the Council on May 27, 2015 adopted the updated Portland Parksand Recreation System Development Charge Methodology Update Report dated April 15, 2015 establishing both a residential and non-residential Parks SDC beginning July 1, 2016, adopted the Parks SDC­ CIP, and adopted an Amendment to Portland City Code Chapter 1 7.13, effective July 1, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • ADA Transition Plan Parks Supplement
    Final Draft: August 2015 CITY OF PORTLAND ADA Title II Transition Plan Update - Parks Facilities City of Portland ADA Title II Transition Plan Update- Parks Facilities Final Draft Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................... i Introduction ........................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ iv Document Organization .......................................................................................... iv 1.0 Transition Plan Process ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Planning Process ............................................................................................... 1 Facility Evaluations .....................................................................................................2 1.2 Public Engagement ............................................................................................ 3 Public Comment Summary ........................................................................................4 Stakeholders ..............................................................................................................4 Website ......................................................................................................................5 2.0 Transition Plan Methodology............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City Club of Portland Report: Portland Metropolitan Area Parks
    Portland State University PDXScholar City Club of Portland Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 9-23-1994 City Club of Portland Report: Portland Metropolitan Area Parks City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.) Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.), "City Club of Portland Report: Portland Metropolitan Area Parks" (1994). City Club of Portland. 470. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub/470 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in City Club of Portland by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND REPORT Portland Metropolitan Area Parks Published in City Club of Portland Bulletin Vol. 76, No. 17 September 23,1994 CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND The City Club membership will vote on this report on Friday September 23, 1994. Until the membership vote, the City Club of Portland does not have an official position on this report. The outcome of this vote will be reported in the City Club Bulletin dated October 7,1994. (Vol. 76, No. 19) CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND BULLETIN 93 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 96 II. A VISION FOR PORTLAND AREA PARKS 98 A. Physical Aspects 98 B. Organizational Aspects 98 C. Programmatic Aspects 99 III. INTRODUCTION 99 IV. BACKGROUND 100 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Park SDC Fees-Rev System 29,208,740.46 232,603,854.64
    Park System Development Charge Annual Report 07/01/18 - 06/30/19 2018-19 Program to Date Park SDC Fees-Rev System 29,208,740.46 232,603,854.64 Leveraged Funds - Grants, Donations, Partner Funds, Loans 1,051,489.00 15,535,556.16 Interest on Investments and Loans 2,563,230.30 7,907,444.27 Bond Proceeds - OHRF Loan 0.00 959,100.00 Loan Proceeds - Waterleaf / Clatsop Butte Promissary Note 0.00 1,600,000.00 Loans Receivable - PCU Loan 0.00 350,000.00 Loans Receivable - OHRF Loan 0.00 991,598.57 Loans Receivable - Colwood Loan 113,500.00 170,250.00 Loans Receivable - Washington Park Parking Meters Loan 181,600.00 544,800.00 Loans Receivable - PIR Loan 250,000.00 250,000.00 Bond Proceeds from SDC Loan Payment Contract Sales 1,839,600.03 3,315,406.00 Bond Sales Line of Credit 0.00 6,000,000.00 Gross Revenue* 35,208,159.79 270,228,009.64 Administration & Compliance Costs 765,880.79 7,136,573.62 Net Revenue 34,442,279.00 263,091,436.02 Percent Administration & Compliance 2.22% 2.71% Fund Level Expenditures Investment - Waterleaf/ Clatsop Butte Promissary Note Repayment 0.00 1,612,266.36 Investment - PCU Loan 0.00 350,000.00 Investment - OHRF Loan 0.00 978,598.00 Investment - Washington Park Meters Loan 0.00 886,619.66 Investment - Colwood Golf Loan 0.00 1,135,000.00 Investment - PIR Loan 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00 Debt Payments on OHRF loan 0.00 1,045,282.82 Debt Payments on Line of Credit 0.00 6,932,674.90 Total available for projects 248,400,994.28 Summary Expenditures by geographic-area ** 2018-19 Program to Date Central City 25,483.30 24,790,429.32 North 134,240.52 7,721,063.64 Northeast 2,122,174.57 21,953,500.62 Northwest 15,163.51 1,841,380.35 East 2,987,380.57 47,389,139.14 Southeast 1,096,479.38 4,047,810.77 Southwest 658,462.68 13,059,450.56 Citywide 87,831.52 120,949.42 Total Capital Expenditures 7,127,216.05 120,923,723.82 Fund Balance*** 127,477,270.46 * As of June 30, 2011, the combined Limited Tax Revenue bonds outstanding total is $ 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Water Conservation Fund Program Funded Projects
    Land and Water Conservation Fund Program Funded Projects Alameda County Alameda Creek Regional Park Alameda Creek-Coyote Hills Acquisition 1966/67 $819,997 Acquisition of 446 acres. Alameda Shoreline Park Alameda Shoreline Park 1978/79 $335,280 Picnic and play areas, trails. Alvarado Community Center Alvarado/Chavez Park Development 2001/02 $71,466 Development of a gazebo at Alvarado/Chavez Park to include renovated structure and new Aquatic Park Aquatic Park Acquisition 1970/71 $24,633 Acquisition of 1.6 acre addition. Aquatic Park Development 1970/71 $154,581 Picnic areas, tot lot, roads, parking, irrigation, landscaping, and play fields. Aquatic Park Development 1976/77 $107,766 Play area, day camp, picnic area, landscaping, pathways. Ardenwood Park Ardenwood Regional Park Development 1983/84 $201,600 Development of access roads, parking, landscaping, restrooms, utilities and stabilization of farm buildings. Arroyo/Castro Valley Swim P Arroyo/Castro Valley Swim Development 1979/80 $81,280 Renovated swim pools at Castro Valley and Arroyo Swim Centers. Bateman Park Dev Bateman Park Development 1983/84 $37,800 Tot lot, lighting, irrigation, landscaping, paths. Caldecott Park Caldecott Park 1980/81 $202,400 Picnic areas, sports & play fields, trails, parking and restrooms. Caldecott Park Acquisition 1976/77 $151,756 57.1 acres acquired adjacent to the road for regional sports facility. Centennial Park Centennial Park 1979/80 $165,408 Picnic areas, sports fields, play fields. Central Park Central Park Bike Trail Development 1973/74 $14,456 Site preparation of the Civic Center Knoll for parkland use - remove City Government Building and Police buildings, including reconstruction (fill & grade).
    [Show full text]