DOCSLIB.ORG

Extremism and the Islamic Society of North America (Isna)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extremism and the Islamic Society of North America (Isna) EXTREMISM AND THE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (ISNA) FEBRUARY, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 3 Synopsis ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Scope of Inquiry and Definitions ...................................................................................................... 8 1. Fundamentalism ..................................................................................................... 8 2. Anti-Semitism .......................................................................................................... 8 3. Terrorism ................................................................................................................. 8 Founding of ISNA ................................................................................................................................ 9 ISNA Structure and Operations ...................................................................................................... 13 Affiliates .................................................................................................................................... 14 1. The Association of Muslim Social Scientists ....................................................... 14 2. Fiqh Council of North America ............................................................................. 14 3. North American Islamic Trust ............................................................................... 14 Leadership ............................................................................................................................... 15 1. Sayyid Muhammad Syeed (Secretary-General) ................................................. 15 2. Muzammil H. Siddiqi (Board Member and Past President) ................................ 15 3. Jamal Badawi (Board Member) ........................................................................... 16 4. Mohammed Nur Abdullah (President) ................................................................. 17 5. Taha J. Alwani (Chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America) ..................... 17 Funding .................................................................................................................................... 17 Extremism—Global Affiliations ...................................................................................................... 19 Saudi Arabian Fundamentalism ............................................................................................. 19 1. Muslim World League ........................................................................................... 19 2. World Assembly of Muslim Youth ........................................................................ 21 Muslim Brotherhood ................................................................................................................ 22 1. Youssef Qaradawi ................................................................................................. 24 2. Gesellschaft Muslimischer Sozial und Geistenwissenschaftler .......................... 24 3. Muslim Association of Britain ................................................................................ 25 4. Jamaat-e-Islami ..................................................................................................... 25 The International Board of Educational Research and Resources ...................................... 26 Tablighi Jamaat ....................................................................................................................... 26 Extremism—U.S. Affiliations ........................................................................................................... 27 Organizational Extremism—Fundamentalism ............................................................................. 29 Statements of Leaders ............................................................................................................ 29 1 1. Rejection of Other Islamic Practices .................................................................... 30 2. Extreme Social Views ........................................................................................... 30 3. Islamic Supremacy ................................................................................................ 32 4. Politics and Religion .............................................................................................. 34 5. Islamic Rule ........................................................................................................... 35 Ideological Control ................................................................................................................... 37 1. Exclusionary Policies ............................................................................................ 37 2. Control of Mosques ............................................................................................... 39 3. Conference Speakers ........................................................................................... 42 4. Prison Chaplains ................................................................................................... 42 Organizational Extremism—Anti-Semitism .................................................................................. 42 Anti-Semitism and ISNA Leaders ........................................................................................... 42 Institute of Islamic Information and Education ....................................................................... 46 Conference Speakers ............................................................................................................. 48 Islamic Horizons ...................................................................................................................... 50 Organizational Extremism—Terrorism .......................................................................................... 50 Statements and Positions ....................................................................................................... 50 ISNA Links to Terrorism .......................................................................................................... 53 1. Palestinian Islamic Jihad ...................................................................................... 53 2. Hamas ................................................................................................................... 54 3. Other Terror Connections ..................................................................................... 59 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 59 Appendix 1: ISNA Leadership Structure ....................................................................................... 61 Appendix 2: ISNA and the Saudi/Muslim Brotherhood Global Network .................................. 62 Appendix 3: American Saudi/Muslim Brotherhood Network ..................................................... 63 Endnotes............................................................................................................................................. 64 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since the September 11, 2001 attacks, the US has been increasingly concerned about its relations with Muslim communities. Domestically, it has reached out to various Islamic organizations in an effort to engage the Muslim-American population in the “war on terrorism” and the fight against Islamic radicals. One partner of the US State Department in this area has been the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a self-described “umbrella” organization for Muslims in North America. ISNA has been involved in various State Department efforts to reach out to the Islamic world, such as a 2005 conference in Belgium that was intended to help create an international network of Islamic moderates. An important factor in ISNA’s special relationship with the US government is its designation and reputation as a “moderate” group. However, there is a substantial body of evidence that leads to the opposite conclusion. This is troubling from the standpoint of US policy, because if a major partner in the State Department’s relations with Muslim communities is associated with Islamic fundamentalism and radicalism, it would undermine and discredit the anti-extremism efforts of the US government. ISNA is, in fact, an organization seriously tainted by extremism—the current views of the State Department and ISNA’s own protestations of moderation notwithstanding. This conclusion stems from a close analysis of three characteristics that can be used as indicators of extremism. ISNA’s organization was evaluated based on the presence of fundamentalism, anti-Semitism, and connections to terrorism. In this analysis, Islamic fundamentalism refers to “a political ideology based on a ‘selective and arbitrary politicization of religion.’” Charges of anti-Semitism can be leveled against individuals and organizations who decry “Zionist
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Muslim Antisemitism and the Conspiracy of Silence / Neil J
    Additional Praise for “The Sons of Pigs and Apes” “Although Neil Kressel’s magisterial essay is primarily addressed at those in the West who pretend that antisemitism is no more than a tragic memory, it is also of great value for those Muslims who dream of, and increasingly fight for, a free society. Kressel’s message is clear: fighting anti-Jewish ideas and practices must be an integral part of any strategy for freedom in Muslim countries.” —Amir TAheri, AuThor of The Persian nighT “Shines new light on antisemitism in the Muslim world, and shows how hatred of the Jewish people remains a potent—even deadly—force in modern times. Kressel ably distinguishes between legitimate criticism of Israel and antisemitism and debunks the false accusation that the Jewish community wields the charge of antisemitism as a bludgeon to quash anti-Israel criticism.” ––AbrAhAm h. foxmAn, nationAl direcTor, AnTi-defAmation leAgue “Many books have recently been written about Islamic antisemitism, but none is as precise, scrupulous, and well-informed as Neil Kressel’s ‘The Sons of Pigs and Apes,’ which is a thorough unmasking of some disgraceful attitudes, and of the widespread failure to confront them.” —irfAn KhAwAjA, chAir, depArTmenT of philosophy, feliciAn college “An important but disquieting book. Neil Kressel’s skill as a social scientist is manifest throughout the work and his arguments persuasive. To cure a malaise one must first confront its symptoms and seek their underlying causes. In dealing with Muslim antisemitism, Kressel’s work is more than helpful—it is essential.” —michAel berenbAum, former direcTor of The uniTed states holocAusT reseArch insTiTuTe at The u.s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brookings Institution Freedom, Religion And
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION FREEDOM, RELIGION AND DEMOCRACY IN THE AGE OF THE 24/7 NEWS CYCLE: A DUTCH PERSPECTIVE Washington, D.C. Friday, April 11, 2008 Introduction and Moderator: DANIEL BENJAMIN Senior Fellow and Director Center on the United States and Europe The Brookings Institution Featured Speaker: BERT KOENDERS Minister for Development Cooperation Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Netherlands Discussant: SAYYID M. SYEED National Director Office for the Interfaith and Community Alliance Islamic Society of North America * * * * * 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. BENJAMIN: -- religion and democracy in the age of the 24/7 news cycle, a Dutch perspective, with Bert Koenders, Dutch Minister for Development and Cooperation. You know, particularly since 9/11, I think we’ve all been recognizing that we are in an era when we are grappling with different aspects of globalization. Even before 9/11 we all recognized that we were grappling with issues of destabilizing capital flows. We have seen a rather substantial rise in immigration n many different parts of the world, so flows of human capital, as well. And I think no aspect of globalization is more important than the flow of different ideas into different communities, different societies and different parts of the world. For those of us who study, as I do, extremism and radicalism, there’s been a lot of attention to the development of what the French sociologist, Olivier Roy has called the “virtual ummah.” And there’s been a lot of interest in it -- in the transferral of a rather, and occasionally, dangerous, set of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2015 I. Manifestations of Isla
    Cultural & social affairs Department OIC islamophobia Observatory Monthly Bulletin – May 2015 I. MANIFESTATIONS OF ISLAMOPHOBIA: I.I. In the United States and Canada: 1. US: No regrets for organizer of cartoon Contest—The woman behind the Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest in Garland, Texas, that was the target of an attack by militants said she had no regrets. Pamela Geller told The Associated Press in an interview on 7 May. Geller's American Freedom Defense Initiative organized the contest to draw Islam's prophet. Geller's group was also behind controversial ads in the New York subway that read: "In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man." In smaller letters, it added: "Support Israel. Defeat Jihad." Geller also run an organization called Stop Islamization of America, which spearheaded the effort to prevent the construction of a Muslim community center near the site of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. In: http://www.ideastream.org/news/npr/405052650, retrieved on 08.05.2015 2. US: Megachurch Pastor Robert Jeffress: Satan 'Delivered' Islam to Muhammad, Following Islam Will 'Lead You to Hell'—Dallas megachurch pastor Robert Jeffress said on 10 May during his ‘Countdown to the Apocalypse,’ sermon series that it was Satan who delivered the religion of Islam to the prophet Muhammad and further asserted that following that religion will ‘lead you to hell.’ In his six-week sermon series, Jeffress, who pastors Dallas' 11,000-member First Baptist Church, explained how Jesus told of the rise of radical Islam and that increased Christian persecution around the world would precede His return to this Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Human Rights to Combat Extremism
    ADVANCING HUMAN RIGHTS TO COMBAT EXTREMISM HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA, GLOBAL HEALTH, GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS, AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION DECEMBER 6, 2017 Serial No. 115–92 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ or http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–755PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:00 Jan 16, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\_AGH\120617\27755 SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS EDWARD R. ROYCE, California, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOE WILSON, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida TED POE, Texas KAREN BASS, California DARRELL E. ISSA, California WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island MO BROOKS, Alabama AMI BERA, California PAUL COOK, California LOIS FRANKEL, Florida SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii RON DESANTIS, Florida JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois TED S. YOHO, Florida BRENDAN F. BOYLE, Pennsylvania ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois DINA TITUS, Nevada LEE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Aid and the Fight Against Terrorism and Proliferation: Leveraging Foreign Aid to Achieve U.S
    FOREIGN AID AND THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND PROLIFERATION: LEVERAGING FOREIGN AID TO ACHIEVE U.S. POLICY GOALS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TERRORISM, NONPROLIFERATION, AND TRADE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 31, 2008 Serial No. 110–225 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 43–840PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOWARD L. BERMAN, California, Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey Samoa DAN BURTON, Indiana DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT WEXLER, Florida DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BILL DELAHUNT, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado DIANE E. WATSON, California RON PAUL, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington JEFF FLAKE, Arizona RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri MIKE PENCE, Indiana JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee JOE WILSON, South Carolina GENE GREEN, Texas JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas CONNIE MACK, Florida RUBE´ N HINOJOSA, Texas JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas DAVID WU, Oregon TED POE, Texas BRAD MILLER, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina LINDA T.
    [Show full text]
  • JRF Full Thesis for Hardbound
    Questioning the Promotion of Friendship in Interfaith Dialogue: Interfaith Friendship in Light of the Emphasis on Particularity in Scriptural Reasoning Jennifer Ruth Fields Jesus College 9 December 2019 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. This thesis is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any work that has already been submitted before for any degree or other qualification except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the Faculty of Divinity Degree Committee. ABSTRACT Questioning the Promotion of Friendship in Interfaith Dialogue: Interfaith Friendship in Light of the Emphasis on Particularity in Scriptural Reasoning Jennifer Ruth Fields ‘Friendship’ is among the buzzwords such as ‘peace’, ‘tolerance’, and ‘understanding’, that are part of a shared vocabulary in the interfaith world. In discussions of the goals and benefits of interfaith dialogue, buzzwords such as ‘friendship’ are often implicitly presented as a common currency, and there is little attempt to explore how people within each religious tradition might define, shape, and describe them differently. How might, for example, Christians and Muslims differ in their opinions on the nature, possibilities, and limits of interfaith friendship? Looking at general interfaith dialogue material and at material for a specific type of interfaith dialogue, ‘Scriptural Reasoning’, I consider Christian and Muslim discourse, including promotional material for charities, speeches by religious leaders, religious documents, non-academic material (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Islamic Society of North America (1979–2008)
    NAVIGATING IDENTITY THROUGH PHILANTHROPY: A HISTORY OF THE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (1979–2008) Shariq Ahmed Siddiqui Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, Indiana University November 2014 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty of Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________________________ David M. Craig, Ph.D., Committee Chair ________________________________________________ Dwight L. Burlingame, Ph.D. Doctoral Committee ________________________________________________ Edward E. Curtis IV, D.Litt. et Phil. July 30, 2014 ________________________________________________ Abdulkader Sinno, Ph.D. ii © 2014 Shariq Ahmed Siddiqui iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my wife, Sobia Khan, whose love, encouragement, support, and patience were instrumental in its completion. I also dedicate this dissertation to my children, Fatima, Amal, Safaa, and Zaki; who sacrificed a great deal of fatherly time as I completed this dissertation. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation chair, David Craig, for his guidance, support, mentorship, and friendship in helping me complete this dissertation. Working with a Ph.D. student who is not a traditional student, works many jobs, is incredibly civically engaged, and is a father of four could not have been easy. At many points leading up to the completion of this dissertation, I was willing to throw in the towel. David Craig is a huge reason for my staying the course and getting the work done. I also would like to thank my dissertation committee: Dwight Burlingame, Edward Curtis, and Abdulkader Sinno for their contributions in helping me achieve this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Board
    ADVISORY BOARD David Shenk Dr. David W. Shenk was born in Tanzania and served for sixteen years in Somalia and Kenya with the Eastern Mennonites. He is presently Global Consultant with the Eastern Mennonites, giving special attention to Islam. His commitment to peacemaking that commends Christ has taken him into over 100 countries. He has taught courses on Christian-Muslim relations in over a dozen academic institutions. David has authored, co-authored, or edited sixteen books. Especially pertinent is A Muslim and a Christian in Dialogue, co-authored with a Muslim, Badru Kateregga. He proactively seeks opportunities for dialogue with Muslims, especially within conflict-prone arenas. He holds a doctorate in Religious Studies Education with course work in Anthropology from New York University. Lindy Backues Dr. Lindy Backues is Associate Professor of Economic Development at Eastern University. He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Leeds (UK), an M.Sc. in Economic Development from Eastern University, an M.Div. from Asbury Theological Seminary, and a B.Ed.S. from the University of Missouri. Before coming to Eastern University in 2008, Dr. Backues was Indonesia Country Director for Millennium Relief & Development Services. He lived in Indonesia from 1989 through 2007, undertaking grassroots development in the Southeast Asia region. Dr. Backues was also very involved, from 2005 through 2006, in relief and development efforts in the Indonesian region of Aceh, in response to the 2004 tsunami. Tyler Johnson Tyler Johnson directs global and local engagement efforts for East Valley Bible Church in the Phoenix, Arizona area. He is actively involved in cultivating partnerships between faith-based organizations to promote peace throughout Phoenix and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Danger and Dialogue American Catholic Public Opinion and Portrayals of Islam 2 Danger and Dialogue
    DANGER AND DIALOGUE AmericAn cAtholic Public Opinion And PortrAyAls of islAm 2 DANGER AND DIALOGUE AmericAn cAtholic Public Opinion And PortrAyAls of islAm By Jordan Denari Duffner THE BRIDGE INITIATIVE Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding Georgetown University © 2016 contents Key findings AcKnowledgements And About the Author introduction chAPter 1 chAPter 2 chAPter 3 chAPter 4 chAPter 5 conclusions And recommendAtions APPendices endnotes 2 4 6 8 How AMerican CatholiCs view islam, MUsliMs And inTerreliGioUs diAlogue 12 Framed By PoPe FrAnCis: How CatholiC OutleTs PorTrAy islam 50 diAlogue desPiTe differenCes: What For-Sale MateriAls on islam Convey To their CatholiC AUdienCe 66 wHo Are the main CatholiC authors on islam? What is their impact, And Are they Tied To islamophoBiA? 84 local Focus: MateriAls on islam at d.C. CatholiC BooksTores 102 112 116 135 3 AMERICAN CATHOLICS’ VIEWS OF CATHOLIC MEDIA OUTLETS’ ISLAM AND INTERFAITH DIALOGUE PORTRAYAL OF ISLAM ONLINE • Nearly half of Catholics can’t name any • From October 2014 to September 2015, similarities between Catholicism and nearly 800 articles referencing Islam or Islam, or say explicitly that there are Muslims appeared on major American no commonalities. Catholic websites. • When asked about their overall impression • In prominent Catholic outlets, half of the of Muslims, three in ten Catholics admit time the word “Islamic” is used, it is in to having unfavorable views. Only 14% reference to the Islamic State terrorist group. of Catholics say they have favorable views. 45% have “neither favorable nor • The headlines of Catholic articles dealing unfavorable” views. 11% are unsure. with Islam have a negative sentiment overall, and the primary emotion conveyed • Catholics are less likely than the is anger.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Peacemaking Since 9/11
    UNiteD StateS iNStitUte of peaCe www.usip.org SpeCial REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPO R T David Smock and Qamar-ul Huda The Religion and Peacemaking program conducts research, identifies best practices, and develops new peacebuilding tools for religious leaders and organizations. It also helps define and shape the field of religious peacebuilding. USIP’s Religion and Peacemaking program has produced islamic peacemaking a series of Special Reports on Islam, including “Applying Islamic Principles in the Twenty-first Century,” “Ijtihad,” “Islam and Democracy,” “Islamic Perspectives on Peace Since 9/11 and Violence,” and “The Diversity of Muslims in the United States.” This report is the most recent addition to that series. It is coauthored by David Smock, associate vice president for the Religion and Peacemaking program, and Summary Qamar-ul Huda, senior program officer in that program. The research assistant for this project was Basma Yousef. • Muslims in general and Muslim leaders particularly have often been severely criticized for not more energetically condemning the violent acts of Muslim extremists. • Violent extremists are on one edge of the Muslim community. They are counter- balanced by a growing movement of Muslim peacemakers. • Equally as notable as Islamic militancy but less noted are Muslims ’ 1) widespread con- demnation of terrorism and other violent acts; 2) promotion of interfaith dialogue; © 2009 by the United States institute of peace. 3) education of Muslim youth and reeducation of extremist Muslims; and 4) promotion all rights reserved. of peaceful conflict resolution. introduction Muslims in general and Muslim leaders particularly have often been severely criticized for not more energetically condemning the violent acts of Muslim extremists.
    [Show full text]
  • An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal
    The Muslim Brotherhood’s U.S. Network by Zeyno Baran ashington D.C. has suddenly become very interested in the Muslim Brotherhood. American policymakers are debating whether to engage non-violent elements of the Muslim Brother- hood network, both inside and outside the United States, in the hope that such engagement will empower these “moderates” Wagainst violent Wahhabi and Salafi groups such as al-Qaeda. Unfortunately, this strat- egy is based on a false assumption: that “moderate” Islamist groups will confront and weaken their violent co-religionists, robbing them of their support base. This lesser-of-two-evils strategy is reminiscent of the rationale behind the Cold War-era decision to support the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet army. In the short term, the U.S. alliance with the mujahideen did indeed aid America in its struggle against the Soviet Union. In the long term, however, U.S. support led to the empowerment of a dangerous and potent adversary. In choosing its allies, the U.S. cannot afford to elevate short-term tactical considerations above longer-term strate- gic ones. Most importantly, the U.S. must consider the ideology of any potential part- ners. Although various Islamist groups do quarrel over tactics and often bear considerable animosity towards one another, they all agree on the endgame: a world dictated by political Islam. A “divide and conquer” strategy by the United States will only push them closer together. Even though the Muslim Brotherhood (in Arabic, al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun) does not openly call for violence or terrorism, it still does little to oppose it.
    [Show full text]
  • 9Th OIC Observatory Report on Islamophobia
    Original: English NINTH OIC OBSERVATORY REPORT ON ISLAMOPHOBIA May 2015 – September 2016 PRESENTED TO THE 43RD Council of foreign ministers Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan 18-19 October 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD by the OIC Secretary General EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1. TRENDS BRINGING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON ISLAMOPHOBIA, INTOLERANCE AND 7 DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MUSLIMS 1.1. The Refugee Crisis and the Rise of ‘Reflexive’ Prejudice against Muslims in Europe 7 1.2. The 2016 US Presidential Campaigns and the Rise of Anti-Islam Sentiment, Racism and 9 intolerance against Islam 1.3. The Continued Wave of Terrorism in Europe and the Rise of Islamophobia 11 2. MANIFESTATIONS OF ISLAMOPHOBIA 13 2.1. Islamophobia in the USA and Canada 13 2.1.1. Polls and Reports on Islamophobia in the United States and Canada 13 2.1.2. Islamophobic Discourses and Campaigns 17 2.1.3. Surveillance against Islam and Muslims 22 2.1.4. The Rise of Far Rights 25 2.2. Islamophobia in Europe 28 2.2.3. Polls and Reports on Islamophobia in Europe 28 2.2.4. Islamophobic Discourses and Campaigns in Europe 33 2.2.5. The Continued Rise of Far Rights 35 2.3. Islamophobia in the Rest of the World 45 2.3.1. Muslims in Myanmar 45 2.3.2. The Continued Islamophobia in Australia 47 2.3.3. Islamophobia in India 50 2.3.4. Islamophobia in Thailand 52 2.4. Other Islamophobic Trends 55 2.4.1. Islamophobic Gestures and Policies against Veil, Hijab, and Burqa 55 2.4.2. Discrimination against Muslims in Employment 60 i 3.
    [Show full text]