DFO F\L~Iili~~Ll U1 1I11f[I1lrque

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DFO F\L~Iili~~Ll U1 1I11f[I1lrque DFO f\ l ~i ili~~ l l U1~ 1i1 1~f[i1lrque 07000441 SUMMARY RECORD Of MARITIMES REGION FISHERIES SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CANADA AQUACULTURE WORKSHOP Held at HALI FAX LABORATORY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE 1707 LOWER WATER STREET HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA B3J 2R3 NOVEMBER 26 and 27, 1973 .. ' SH 37 5 ~.. M ~UC..F Rf:<ilfONAl f,,fSRAR'G M37 fSHERIES ANO OCEANS ~>a fOTH · £QUE ltEGION OU GOLF£ hCHES ET OCEANS 1 CONTENTS Agenda . 3 List of Attendees and Affiliations . 6 Opening Remarks - J.E. Stewart . 7 Session I 7 Session II . 8 Session III 8 Session IV 9 Session V . 11 Summaries of Prepared Statements . .. .. .. .... .. .... .. ... ......... ..... 15 Notes by G. I. Pritchard . 15 Salmonid Diseases Workshops and Expectations by R.M. MacKelvie ... 17 Implications of Recommendations Emanating from Salmonid Diseases Workshops by T. G. Carey . 25 Salmonid Aquaculture Research at St. Andrews by R.L. Saunders .. .. 26 Lobster Culture by D.E. Aiken 27 Sea Ranching by A. M. Sutterlin . 28 Trout Farming Trials Carried out by Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries by J.S. MacPhail .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 29 Summary of Presentation on ll.lssels, Mytilus edulis by L.L. MacLeod 31 Summary of Presentation on salmonid culture by R.E.H. MacDonald... 34 Acclimation of Kidney-Diseased Atlantic Sa lmon to Salt Water by C. Frantsi and A. Foda . 37 Aquaculture - Oyster Farr'1ing by A. Mciver . 38 Preliminary Studies on Reconditioning Atlantic salmon Kelts (Salmo salar L.) for Release and on Recycling Salmon Kelts for Utilization as 'Broods tock by R. W. Gray . 40 Salmonid Diseases - Program Report by D, Desautels and R.M. MacKel vie . 41 2 Molluscan Disease by M. F. Li and G.S . Traxler...................... 42 Nutrition Repor t to Aquaculture Workshop by J.D. Castell .. .. 44 Ha l i f ax Laboratory Aquaculture Program by J.E. Stewart ....... .. .. 45 Reproductive Physiology of Fish at the Halifax Laboratory by M. S. Mounib . 47 Genet i cs : Aids f or Making Sel ect i ons for Culture by P.H. Odense 49 Aquaculture at t he Mari ne Eco l ogy Laboratory, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia by K. R. Freeman . • • . 50 Smolt Stocks f or Aquaculture by R.F. Hawkins ........ .. .. .. .... .... 52 Economics, Marketing and Cost Accounting in Aquaculture by G. DeWolf 53 Problems and Me t hods Used in Extension Work in Aquaculture by A. Mclver . 54 Need for Extension and Pi lot Plant Work and Possible Arrangements With Industry by R. L. Saunders . 58 Letter from J . S. MacPhail , Director of Resource Development, Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries . .. ... ......... ..... ...... ....... 61 3 Fisheries and Marine Service Maritimes Region Fisheries Service Aquaculture Workshop in Conference Room Halif~x Laboratory Research and Development Directorate Fisheries and Marine Service 1707 Lower Water Street Halifax, Nova Scotia November 26 and 27, 1973 Registration 9:30 - 10:00 a . m. November 26 No Parking Available Agenda Session I 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon November 26 Chairman J.E. Stewart 10:00 a.m. Opening Remarks 10:05 G. I. Pritchard National and Related International Aspects of Aquaculture 10:40 G.I. Pritchard Current Status of Salmonid Disease Regulations 10:50 R.M. MacKelvie Salmonid Diseases Workshops and Expectations 11: 10 T.G. Carey Implications of Recommendations Emanati_ng from Salmonid Diseases Workshops 11: 30 Discussion 12:00 - Lunch 1:00 p.m. 4 S8ssion II 1:00 - 5:00 p. m. ovember 26 Chairman T.G. Carey 1:00 p.m. Opening Remarks 1:05 Program Reports 15 min. each 1. Vancouver - W. Vanstone 2. St. Andrews - R.L. Saunders D. Aiken A. Sutterlin 3. Nova Scotia - J.S. MacPhail 4. Cape Breton Development Corporation - R.E. Drinnan 5. Resource Development Branch - R.E.H. MacDonald C. Frantsi A. Maciver R.W. Gray 6. Halifax Laboratory - J. D. Castell M.F. Li R.M. MacKelvie J.E. Stewart 7. Marine Ecology Laboratory - K. Freeman Session III 7:30 - 10:00 p.m. November 26 Chairman J. S . MacPhail 7:30 p.m. Opening Remarks 7:35 Completion of Program Reports (if necessary) 8:00 R. Hawkins and P. Murray (20 min. address - Discussion) Source of Stocks for Large Scale Commercial Operations 9:00 R. Dewolfe (20 min. address - Discussion) Economics, Marketing and Cost Accounting in Aquaculture 5 Session IV 9 :00 a .m. - 12 :00 no on November 27 Chairman R. L. Saunders 9 :00 a .m. Opening Remarks 9:05 Cons i deration of the most promising species for culture a) Salmonids - Atlantic Salmon, Rainbow Trout, Coho Salmon, Chinook, Brook Trout, etc. 1. Which species and why? 2. Type of unit (tanks, c_ages, etc.). Fresh water or Sea water? 3. Family sized units or large scale? 4. Most important problems in order of priority? 5. Who is doing what now in relation to these problems and who contemplates work on any of these problems? 6. Can th.is work be improved through cooperation and collaboration? 11:00 b) Oysters, Eels, Musse ls, Lobsters, Seaweeds Repeat of considerations under Item a. 12:00 - Lunch 1:00 p.m. Session V 1:00 p.rn. - 5:00 p .rn. November 27 Ch airman J.E. Stewart 1:00 p.m. Opening Remarks 1:05 R. E J-l . MacDonald (20 min. address - Discussion) Regulations Concerned with All Aspects of Aquaculture Operations 2:00 A. Maciver and R. L. Saunders (20 min . address - Discussion) Need for Extension and Pilot Plant work and Possible Arrangements with Industry 3:30 Should a comprehensi ve Atlantic Region meeting on aquaculture, includi ng universities, provincial government o_rganizations and indus tries, be held in March 1974? Should an in-service \vorkshop of the general type just completed be held again? I f so, how often and what should be its general structure? 4:15 p.m . Closing Remarks at Completion of Workshop. 6 In Attendance Name Affiliation D.E. Aiken Fisheries Service, St. Andrews, N.B. R.L. Saunders Fisheries Service, St. Andrews, N.B. A.L. Sutterlin Fisheries Service, St. Andrews, N.B. E.B. Henderson Fisheries Service, St. Andrews, N.B. W.E. Vanstone Fisheries Service, Vancouver, B.C. K.R. Freeman Marine Ecology Lab., Dartmouth, N.S. R. E. Drinnan Marine Ecology Lab., Dartmouth, N.S. & DEVCO T.G. Carey Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. A. Mclver Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. P. Woo Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax , N. S. R.E.H. Macdonald Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. S.R. Baker Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. R.E. Cutting Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. R.F. Hawkins Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. G. Robbins Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. A. Foda Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Fredericton, N.B C. Frantsi Res. Dev. Branch, Fisheries Service, Fredericton, N.B David Newton DEV CO L. Boudreau DEV CO J. Stuart MacPhail N.S. Dept. of Fisheries, Halifax, N.S. L. MacLeod N.S. Dept. of Fisheries, Halifax, N.S. P. Murray Fisheries &Marine Service, Ottawa G. I. Pritchard Fisheries &Marine Service, Ottawa T. C. Clarke SSRB, Fisheries &Marine Service, Ottawa G. DeWolfe Economics Branch, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. B.C. Muise, DEVCO, St. Andrews, N.B. W.D. Paterson Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. J. D. Castell Halifax Laboratory, Fi sheries Service, Halifax, N.S. J.E. Stewart Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. D. Desautels Halifax Laboratory, Fi sheries Service, Halifax, N.S. B. Zwicker Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. B. Arie Halifax Laboratory,,Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. J.W. Cornick Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. R.M. MacKelvie Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. M.F. Li Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N. S. G. Traxler Hal i fax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. J. MacLean Hal ifax Laborat·ory, Fisheries Service, Hal if ax, N.S. L.W. Regier Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. H.S. Shieh Halifax Laboratory, Fisheri es Service, Halifax, N.S. M.S. Mounib Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. V. Logan Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. P.H. Odense Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. M.W. Gilgan Halifax Laboratory, Fisheries Service, Halifax, N.S. Maritimes Region Fisheries Service 7 Aquaculture Workshop The workshop arranged by T.G. Carey, R.D.B. and J.E. Stewart, R & D, Fisheries Service, was mostly in-service and represented an attempt to bring government people up-to-date on what was happening in government and in closely related projects. The emphasis was largely, but not exclusively, on salmonids. The prepared statements listed in the agenda were presented and in some instances were illustrated with slides. Summaries of most of these statements were prepared by the authors and have been included in the written record. Discussions provoked by the prepared statements and by other points raised by different participants have been summarized briefly and presented below largely without attribution and should be read in conjunction with the various authors' summaries. Included as well is a copy of a highly relevant letter from J.S. MacPhail, Director of Resource Development for the Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries. OPENING REMARKS - J.E. Stewart This is a particularly appropriate time to hold a workshop on aquaculture, since even to the most casual observer it has become apparent that there is a multiplicity of private, university, federal and provincial government projects going by the name of aquaculture and costing a great deal of money. With the increasing competition for research funds it is unreasonable to expect continued financing of any research area unless the participants offer evidence of doing something useful and of deriving the maximum benefit from the money spent on the various projects going to make up the whole.
Recommended publications
  • Open Ocean Aquaculture in the Santa Barbara Channel: an Emerging Challenge for the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary
    Open Ocean Aquaculture in the Santa Barbara Channel: An emerging challenge for the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Wild Pacific sardines (Sardinops sagax) off Santa Cruz Island (©2006 Jaimi Kercher). A report by the Conservation Working Group of the CINMS Advisory Council Adopted by the CINMS Advisory Council July 20, 2007 Project Director: Linda Krop, Conservation Chair, CINMS Advisory Council Chief Counsel, Environmental Defense Center Prepared by: Shiva Polefka, Marine Conservation Analyst Environmental Defense Center (primary contact; [email protected]) Sarah Richmond and John Dutton, Program Interns Environmental Defense Center Supported by the Marisla Foundation Timeline of document development, review and approval 21 September, 2006 Draft report approved by Conservation Working Group (CWG) 12 January, 2007 Draft report distributed to Sanctuary Advisory Council (Council) members for review and feedback 19 January, 2007 Major findings and recommendations presented to the Council; formal solicitation of feedback to Council members 28 February, 2007 Presentation of findings and recommendation to Research Activities Panel (RAP) at UCSB, solicitation to RAP members for review/feedback 16 March, 2007 Presentation to the Council of major comments received from Council members, summary of corresponding revisions to be made to Final Draft, extension of review/comment period to March 30, 2007 18 May, 2007 Presentation to the Council of final draft, focusing on new recommendations and major substantive changes made as a result of SAC member feedback 20 July, 2007 Final report and recommendations amended and adopted by unanimous vote (15-0) of the Council, and forwarded to CINMS Superintendent The Sanctuary Advisory Council's deliberation of this report is documented in meeting notes posted online at: http://www.channelislands.noaa.gov/sac/minutes.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Lufenuron for Salmonids
    Elanco Animal Health Page 1 of 25 Lufenuron Date: 05 September 2016 US Import Tolerance EA Final LUFENURON FOR SALMONIDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN SUPPORT OF AN IMPORT TOLERANCE REQUEST Final: Original signed and on file John G McHenery BSc, PhD, FRSB, CBiol Elanco Animal Health 4002-Basel, Switzerland 05 September 2016 Elanco Animal Health Page 2 of 25 Lufenuron Date: 05 September 2016 US Import Tolerance EA Final TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 General information .......................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Purpose and need for the proposed action ....................................................................... 3 3.0 Identification of the substance .......................................................................................... 3 4.0 Sites of introduction and exposure pathways ................................................................... 4 5.0 Analysis of exposure and risk ........................................................................................... 5 6.0 Description of any alternatives to the proposed use ......................................................... 9 7.0 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 9 8.0 Agencies and persons consulted ...................................................................................... 9 9.0 Author ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Justification for the Mitigated Determination of Non
    Justification for the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) for Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife SEPA 19-056 and for the Approval of Cooke Aquaculture Pacific’s Marine Aquaculture Permit Application Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (contact: Dr. Kenneth I. Warheit; [email protected]) January 21, 2020 (Erratum section 4.2.5 January 29, 2020) INTRODUCTION In January 2019, Cooke Aquaculture Pacific (hereafter termed Cooke) submitted to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) two applications: (1) an application to renew an expiring 5-year Marine Aquaculture Permit to continue to culture Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) at Cooke's marine net- pen facilities in Puget Sound; and (2) an application for a new 5-year Marine Aquaculture Permit to transition production from Atlantic salmon to all-female triploid (sterile) steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at Cooke's existing marine net-pen facilities in Puget Sound. Included with these applications were Fish Escape, Prevention, Response, and Reporting Plan; Regulated Finfish Pathogen Reporting Plan; Plan of Operation for All-female Triploid Rainbow Trout1; and Plan of Operation for Atlantic Salmon Rearing. In March 2019, WDFW approved and issued to Cooke a renewal of their 5-year Marine Aquaculture Permit for Atlantic salmon, contingent on the requirement specified in EHB 2957 that farming of nonnative marine finfish in Puget Sound is valid only with a current lease of state-owned aquatic lands. At the same time, WDFW responded to Cooke's second application by informing them that before WDFW could decide on their permit application a SEPA process was required to determine the environmental effects of transitioning production from Atlantic salmon to all-female, triploid steelhead trout at their existing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATUS of AQUACULTURE in SOUTH AMERICA by Carlos
    THE STATUS OF AQUACULTURE IN SOUTH AMERICA By Carlos Massad Inter-American Development Bank Forestry and Fisheries Section Washington, D.C. May 1987 This work was done in partial fulfillment of the degree of Masters of Science at Oregon State University, Corvallis. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER I...Overview and Analysis 2 General Aspects 3 Current World Production 4 Regional Situation 5 General Situation of Aquaculture 5 Human Resources and Extension Services 7 Legal and Institutional Aspects 8 Outlook for Development 8 Limitations and Critical Problems 9 Recommendations for Future Action 11 CHAPTER II...Situation by Country 12 Argentina 13 Bolivia 18 Brazil 21 Chile 34 Colombia 40 Ecuador 48 Paraguay 54 Peru 58 Uruguay 66 Venezuela 69 BIBLIOGRAPHY 75 1 INTRODUCTION The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), a financial institution with 25 years of existence, is comprised of 43 member countries: 25 from Latin America and the Caribbean and 18 from North America, Europe and Asia. It acts as the main source of funds for developmental projects in the Latin American region. Nineteen years ago, the IDB began promoting the possibilities and significance of fishery development in Latin America. The experience gained over these years indicates that financial development agencies can make contributions to the progress of this sector if they have an accurate diagnosis on the sector, including natural and human resources, institutions, government policies, infrastructure, production capacity and developmental potential. In response to the banks desire to know the present situation of aquaculture in South America, its forestry and fisheries section hired a summer intern to conduct this up- date.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Impacts of Introduced Salmonids on Australian Native Fauna
    OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACTS OF INTRODUCED SALMONIDS ON AUSTRALIAN NATIVE FAUNA by P. L. Cadwallader prepared for the Australian Nature Conservation Agency 1996 ~~ AUSTRALIA,,) Overview of the Impacts of Introduced Salmonids on Australian Native Fauna by P L Cadwallader The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Commonwealth Government, the Minister for the Environment or the Director of National Parks and Wildlife. ISBN 0 642 21380 1 Published May 1996 © Copyright The Director of National Parks and Wildlife Australian Nature Conservation Agency GPO Box 636 Canberra ACT 2601 Design and art production by BPD Graphic Associates, Canberra Cover illustration by Karina Hansen McInnes CONTENTS FOREWORD 1 SUMMARY 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. SPECIES OF SALMONIDAE IN AUSTRALIA 7 2.1 Brown trout 7 2.2 Rainbow trout 8 2.3 Brook trout 9 2.4 Atlantic salmon 9 2.5 Chinook salmon 10 2.6 Summary of present status of salmonids in Australia 11 3. REVIEW OF STUDIES ON THE IMPACTS OF SALMONIDS 13 3.1 Studies on or relating to distributions of salmonids and native fish 13 Grey (1929) Whitley (1935) Williams (1964) Fish (1966) Frankenberg (1966, 1969) Renowden (1968) Andrews (1976) Knott et at. (1976) Cadwallader (1979) Jackson and Williams (1980) Jackson and Davies (1983) Koehn (1986) Jones et al. (1990) Lintermans and Rutzou (1990) Minns (1990) Sanger and F ulton (1991) Sloane and French (1991) Shirley (1991) Townsend and Growl (1991) Hamr (1992) Ault and White (1994) McIntosh et al. (1994) Other Observations and Comments 3.2 Studies Undertaken During the Invasion of New Areas by Salmonids 21 Tilzey (1976) Raadik (1993) Gloss and Lake (in prep) 3.3 Experimental Introduction study 23 Fletcher (1978) 3.4 Feeding Studies, Including Analysis of Dietary Overlap and Competition, and Predation 25 Introductory Comments Morrissy (1967) Cadwallader (1975) Jackson (1978) Cadwallader and Eden (1981,_ 1982) Sagar and Eldon (1983) Glova (1990) Glova and Sagar (1991) Kusabs and Swales (1991) Crowl et at.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Science Advance Access Published September 2, 2014 ICES Journal of Marine Science
    ICES Journal of Marine Science Advance Access published September 2, 2014 ICES Journal of Marine Science ICES Journal of Marine Science; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu132 Risk assessment of the environmental impact of Norwegian Downloaded from Atlantic salmon farming Geir Lasse Taranger1, Ørjan Karlsen2*, Raymond John Bannister1, Kevin Alan Glover1, Vivian Husa1, Egil Karlsbakk1, Bjørn Olav Kvamme1, Karin Kroon Boxaspen1,Pa˚l Arne Bjørn3, Bengt Finstad4, http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/ Abdullah Sami Madhun1, H. Craig Morton1, and Terje Sva˚sand1 1Institute of Marine Research, PB 1870, N-5817 Bergen, Norway 2Institute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, N-5392 Storebø, Norway 3Institute of Marine Research, PB 6404, N-9294 Tromsø, Norway 4Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, PB 5685 Sluppen, N-7485 Trondheim, Norway *Corresponding author: tel: +47 4691 2740; fax: +47 5618 2222; e-mail: [email protected] Taranger,G. L., Karlsen, Ø., Bannister, R. J., Glover, K. A., Husa, V., Karlsbakk, E., Kvamme, B. O., Boxaspen, K. K., Bjørn, P. A., Finstad, B., at Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning, Library on September 2, 2014 Madhun, A. S., Morton, H. C., and Sva˚sand, T. Risk assessmentof the environmental impactof Norwegian Atlantic salmon farming. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu132. Received 23 February 2014; revised 8 July 2014; accepted 10 July 2014. Norwegian aquaculture has grown fromits pioneering days inthe 1970sto be a major industry.It is primarily based on culturing Atlantic salmonand rainbow trout and has the potential to influence the surrounding environment and wild populations. To evaluate these potential hazards, the Institute of Marine Research initiated a risk assessment of Norwegian salmon farming in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Mariculture a Global Review. FAO Fisheries And
    ISSN 2070-7010 529 FAO FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL PAPER 529 Integrated mariculture A global review Integrated mariculture – A global review global A – mariculture Integrated This technical paper provides a comprehensive review of current integrated mariculture practices around the world in three papers covering temperate zones, tropical zones and one semi enclosed ecosystem, the Mediterranean Sea. Integrated mariculture includes a diverse range of co-culture/farming practices, from integrated multitrophic aquaculture to the more specialized integration of mangrove planting with aquaculture, called aquasilviculture. Modern integrated mariculture systems must be developed in order to assist sustainable expansion of the sector in coastal and marine ecosystems thus responding to the global increase for seafood demand but with a new paradigm of more efficient food production systems. Successful integrated mariculture operations must consider all relevant stakeholders into its development plan, there is also a need to facilitate commercialization and promote effective legislation for the support and inclusion of integrated mariculture through adequate incentives particularly considering the reduction of environmental costs associated to monoculture farming. Bioremediation of fed aquaculture impacts through integrated mariculture is a core benefit but the increase of production, more diverse and secure business and larger profits should not be underestimated as additional advantages. ISBN 978-92-5-106387-3 ISSN 2070-7010 978 9 2 5 1 0
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives for Sustainable Development of Nordic Aquaculture
    TemaNord 20 TemaNord 13:546 Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org Perspectives for sustainable development of Nordic aquaculture Perspectives for sustainable development The Paban-Report of Nordic aquaculture Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing productions and the value of aquaculture is now about to pass the value of capture fisheries. Among the Nordic countries, Norway in particular has been able to create a large aquaculture industry with high growth rates over a number of years. The other Nordic countries have only had limited growth, but have a high unutilised potential. There is a need to identify opportunities and limitations for increased growth with due care for sustainability and environment. This report identifies seven focus areas with special potential for creation of a sustainable, com- petitive Nordic aquaculture sector. These areas are new feeds, better use and reuse of nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon), value adding of by-products, technological and regional development, domestication of new species and reduction of energy consumption. The aquaculture sector with its strengths and weaknesses is described for each of the Nordic countries. The report is compiled on basis of contributions from a Nordic group of experts. It was presented at a seminar on Green Growth at the annual meeting of the Nordic Ministers of Fisheries in Trondheim, July 2012. TemaNord 2013:546 ISBN 978-92-893-2571-4 TN2013546 omslag.indd 1 17-05-2013 09:28:44 Perspectives for sustainable development of Nordic aquaculture
    [Show full text]
  • Saprolegnia Species.Pdf
    Aquaculture 434 (2014) 462–469 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquaculture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online Saprolegnia species affecting the salmonid aquaculture in Chile and their associations with fish developmental stage Jose Vladimir Sandoval-Sierra a, Fadua Latif-Eugenin b, María P. Martín a, Luis Zaror b,1, Javier Diéguez-Uribeondo a,⁎ a Departamento de Micología, Real Jardín Botánico CSIC, Plaza Murillo 2, 28014 Madrid, Spain b Instituto de Microbiología Clínica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile article info abstract Article history: The rapid increase in the aquaculture production of salmonids has been followed by a rise in several diseases. In Received 15 July 2014 particular, saprolegniosis can account for at least 10% of the annual economic loss in salmonids. In this study, we Received in revised form 28 August 2014 investigated the main Saprolegnia species involved in saprolegniosis of salmonids in Chile, and their association Accepted 4 September 2014 with specific developmental stages of the host fish. For this purpose, we studied 244 isolates of Saprolegnia- Available online 16 September 2014 affected Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and king salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the salmon farming regions, using a recently developed identification strategy based on mo- Keywords: Oomycetes lecular taxonomical operational units. We found that the Saprolegnia species associated with diseased salmon Pathogen were Saprolegnia australis, Saprolegnia delica, Saprolegnia diclina, Saprolegnia ferax, Saprolegnia parasitica and Salmon two new Saprolegnia species observed during this study. In order to determine whether there were any specific ITS nrDNA species associations with different stages in the fish life cycle, we applied mosaic plots and correspondence anal- MOTUs yses for categorical data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innovation System of Norwegian Aquacultured Salmonids
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics The Innovation System of Norwegian Aquacultured Salmonids Heidi Wiig Aslesen NIFU STEP, Oslo Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract This paper is about one of the most important export products in Norway, “Norwegian salmon”, focusing especially on the innovation system of aquaculture of salmon and trout in Norway, the aim of the paper is to describe the sector in a national and global context, for thereafter highlight in particular how different aquaculture firms operate and carry out innovation by looking at what kind of external relations and interactive learning processes are involved in innovation, and as such suggesting input to policy makers on how to strengthen the sectoral innovation system, a sector with the potential to become even more knowledge intensive and innovative than today. By differentiating aquaculture according to knowledge base and degree of structured and functionally differentiated organisations, the empirical material presented in this paper shows that aquaculture firms have very different approaches to innovation; from anti- innovation strategies to strategies of being in the fore-front of innovation in the industry. The empirical material has shown that firms with very different innovation systems exists side-by-side and the overall functioning of the sectoral innovation system of aquaculture is influenced by all the different layers of firm types. Version of 06.08.2007 TIK Working paper on Innovation Studies No. 20070606 *This paper is part of the project "Innovation, Path-dependency and Policy" (IPP) carried out at the Centre for Technology, Innovation Culture (TIK), University of Oslo with the support of the Norwegian Research Council (Contract no.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Salmon Lice
    Master’s Thesis 2020 30 ECTS Faculty of Landscape and Society (LANDSAM) Biological Control of Salmon Lice: A Critical Analysis of Knowledge Production and Development in the Norwegian Cleaner Fish Industry Patrick John Bolliger Master of Science in International Environment Studies BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF SALMON LICE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS Abstract The lumpfish and four species of wrasse have become important resources for cleaning salmonids of sea lice in Norwegian aquaculture. Cleaner fish’s delousing effectiveness and mortality rates in salmon cages vary dramatically due to environmental conditions, disease, and husbandry practices. While cleaner fish are portrayed as an environmentally friendly product, no post-cleaning use is made of their body parts. Thus, researchers and animal rights organisations have questioned whether the wrasse fishery and large-scale lumpfish aquaculture is justified and ethical. This case study analyses themes derived from qualitative interviews focussing on the history, knowledge production, and contestation of cleaner fish practices using a critical political ecology approach. The results suggest that despite rapid growth in their use, cleaner fish are an impermanent delousing solution. Perceptions of cleaner fish use are changing from optimism to scepticism and their use is characterised by uncertainty due to efficacy and welfare challenges. I argue that producing and using cleaner fish in Norway is contradictory in nature and constitutes a ‘socioecological fix’ of capitalism. This helps explain how salmon aquaculture’s inherent vulnerability to lice creates an opportunity for behaviour in cleaner fish to be produced, exploited, and profited on. At the same time, this process both produces and ‘fixes’ social, economic, and environmental externalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles in Canadian Aquaculture, Bulletin 112-1
    Profiles in Canadian Aquaculture Bulletin Bulletin de l’Association aquacole du Canada of the Aquaculture Association of Canada 112-1 112-1 Vous pouvez r ecevoir l e B ulletin en vous y abonnant pour The Bulletin is available through subscription ($60 per year) or l a somme de 60$ par année ou en devenant membre de as a benefit of membership in the Aquaculture Association of l ’Association aquacole du Canada (AAC), organisme à but non Canada, a nonprofit charitable organization. lucratif. Pour de plus amples renseignements, communiquez avec For membership information contact: l’Association aquacole du Canada, 16 Lobster Lane, Aquaculture Association of Canada, 16 Lobster Lane, St-Andrews (Nouveau-Brunswick), Canada E5B 3T6 St. Andrews, N.B., Canada E5B 3T6 [tél.: 506 529-4766; téléc.: 506 529-4609; [telephone 506 529-4766; fax 506 529-4609; courriel: [email protected]; e-mail [email protected]; Internet: http://www.aquacultureassociation.ca]. website http://www.aquacultureassociation.ca]. La cotisation s’élève à 100$ par personne (50 $ pour les étudiants Annual dues are $100 for individuals ($50 for students and et les retraités) et 300$ pour les sociétés. seniors) and $300 for organizations. The Bulletin is indexed in Le Bulletin est répertorié dans les Résumés des sciences aquatiques Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) and the et halieutiques (ASFA) et le Zoological Record. Zoological Record. Mailed under Canada Post Publications Mail Envoi de publication Enregistrement n° 40065445. Commercial Sales Agreement No. 40065445 ISSN 0840-5417 ISSN 0840-5417 Conception et mise en page: Capamara Communications Inc.
    [Show full text]