DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating Information: Where Do Librarians and Skeptics Align?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating Information: Where Do Librarians and Skeptics Align? Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Michael Schwartz Library Publications Michael Schwartz Library 6-2017 Evaluating Information: Where Do Librarians and Skeptics Align? Evan Meszaros Case Western Reserve University, [email protected] Mandi Goodsett Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/msl_facpub Part of the Library and Information Science Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Original Citation Meszaros, E. C., & Goodsett, M. (2017, June). Evaluating information: Where do librarians and skeptics align? Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the American Library Association, Chicago, IL. Repository Citation Meszaros, Evan and Goodsett, Mandi, "Evaluating Information: Where Do Librarians and Skeptics Align?" (2017). Michael Schwartz Library Publications. 140. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/msl_facpub/140 This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the Michael Schwartz Library at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michael Schwartz Library Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evaluating Information: Where Do Librarians and Skeptics Align? Evan Meszaros, MS1, Mandi Goodsett, MS2 1. Research Services Librarian | Kelvin Smith Library | Case Western Reserve University | Cleveland, OH 2. Performing Arts & Humanities Librarian | Michael Schwartz Library | Cleveland State University | Cleveland, OH Introduction Results Alignment of Statements with Personal Beliefs Many factual claims are true for which there is no evidence. Although librarians may not realize it, our profession has many shared goals and values with those who consider themselves The results of our survey are broken down into five sections: Demographics, Evidential Basis for Belief (Not Skeptic-Aligned) ? û methodological or scientific skeptics—a term we denote here as “Skeptics” with a capital ‘S’. A thorough review of the literature Association, Alignment, Awareness, and Application of Skepticism to Demographics I only believe factual claims to the extent that there is evidence for them. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü indicates that, while a Skeptical attitude toward information is arguably important to the work of instruction librarians, no Information Literacy Instruction (data not shown). The ‘Association’ section ? 0.8% n=499 research has been conducted on the Skepticism of librarians. asked participants to associate specific words with Skepticism and critical Intuition is often the best tool for determining truth. 5.6% Truth from Intuition vs. (Not Skeptic-Aligned) û thinking. The ‘Alignment’ section prompted respondents with a series of ? 0–2 Reasoning from Evidence The best method for determining truth is by reasoning from evidence, The researchers of the present study surveyed a variety of librarians who teach information evaluation in an effort to explore statements corresponding (or in opposition) to Skeptical principles. if it's available. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü ? the following research questions: Respondents were asked to indicate how closely each statement aligned 25.9% 3–10 It's important to stick to your beliefs once they have been established. with their personal beliefs, suggesting the extent to which librarians’ values (Not Skeptic-Aligned) ? û • ​What attitudes do librarians have toward Skeptics and Skeptical values? overlap with those of Skeptics. In the ‘Awareness’ section, participants 41.1% Corrigibility If evidence causes me to believe a claim, I am open to changing my mind • How closely do the values of librarians align with those of the Skeptic community? indicated their awareness of the modern Skeptic movement and their 11–20 if new, contrary evidence becomes available. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü ? • ​How much—and in what ways—do librarians who teach information literacy instruction employ Skeptical values and willingness to identify as a Skeptic. Lastly, respondents were asked to share If a trusted source claims that something is true, that alone is sufficient 26.7% evidence. (Not Skeptic-Aligned) û principles? how frequently and in what ways they applied skeptical principles when >20 Corroboration ? teaching information literacy. This section included an open-response Independent confirmation of facts contributes to their reliability. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü ? question which yielded a variety of librarians’ self-reported methods for I do not work in a library/archive / Other Background: The “Skeptic Community” teaching source evaluation. The final survey question asked respondents to It is important to distrust most claims. (Not Skeptic-Aligned) û share any comments or concerns they had with the survey overall, and Figure 2. Percentage of survey respondents Appropriate Skepticism ? The modern Skeptic community is thought to date back to Martin Gardner’s book, “In the Name of Science”, published in 1952. (n=499) reporting number of years spent working It's important to only doubt things when there is good reason for these comments may be found in the Padlet linked on our research guide. doubting. (Skeptic-Aligned) ? û Other early founders of the movement include James “The Amazing” Randi, a magician who appeared often on The Tonight in a library/archive. Show and elsewhere in the media; Paul Kurtz, philosopher and founder of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Expert communities are very often mistaken, so it's very important to trust the individuals whose claims resonate most with you. (Not Skeptic-Aligned) ? û Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), which eventually became the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI); and Michael Shermer, Expert Consensus I have more reason to believe something when there is a consensus about the founder of the Skeptics Society and Skeptic Magazine. Intellectuals and public figures from a variety of fields have become Academic 414 Social sciences 130 that issue within the appropriate community of experts. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü ? important (and controversial) voices for the Skeptic community as well, including the late astronomer and science popularizer 113 Public 56 Humanities It's important to consider all possible explanations for a phenomenon Carl Sagan; neurologist Steven Novella; physician and “SkepDoc” Harriet Hall; philosopher Massimo Pigliucci; Center for Applied Parsimony (AKA equally. (Not Skeptic-Aligned) ü û Applied sciences (e.g. … 78 ? Rationality co-founder Julia Galef; and magicians Penn & Teller, among many others. School 22 Occam’s Razor) If there are two hypotheses that explain some data equally well, I choose Natural sciences 54 the simpler one. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü ? û Special 18 Arts 53 I tend to give the claims people make the benefit of the doubt. Sufficient Evidence vs. (Not Skeptic-Aligned) û Archives / special collections 9 ? Do not have a subject area … 22 Benefit of the Doubt I tend to refuse to accept claims that lack sufficient evidence. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü ? Other 5 n=499 Law 5 n=256 I tend to trust most things that a person with credentials says. 0 100 200 300 400 0 50 100 150 (Not Skeptic-Aligned) ü û Appropriate Expertise ? Figure 3. Number of survey respondents (n=499) reporting the Figure 4. Number of academic librarian survey respondents An expert with credentials is more likely to be trustworthy only in her/his specific area of expertise. (Skeptic-Aligned) ü type of library or archive they work at. Note: survey respondents (n=256) reporting discipline(s) or subject area(s) they support. ? could choose more than one answer. n=464 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Figure 7. Proportion of survey-takers (n=464) responding with “Very much” (green, left-most bar on each graph, symbolized by “ü”), “Somewhat” (gray, middle bar in each graph, symbolized by “?”), and “Not at all” (red, right-most bar on each graph, symbolized by “û”) regarding their agreement with the statement shown to the left of each graph. While statements were presented to survey-takers in a Awareness of Skeptics, Skepticism, and the Skeptic Community random order, pairs of statements—each containing statements deemed “Non-Skeptic Aligned” and “Skeptic-Aligned” by the researchers— are named (far left) for the Skeptical principles they contravene or exemplify, respectively. Are you aware of the modern Skeptics movement? Would you consider yourself a Skeptic? Yes Application of Skepticism to Information Literacy Instruction Yes (83) When asked whether they “Always”, “Often”, “Sometimes”, “Rarely”, or “Never” do the following, the majority of respondents (143) Yes (157) No (135) No who reported having information literacy instruction responsibilities (n=388) reported that they “Always” or “Often” encouraged (239) students to refuse to accept information that lacks sufficient evidence (65.2%), to re-evaluate their beliefs based on new Maybe No (320) Somewhat evidence (64.4%), and to examine the expert consensus within a subject or discipline as part of the source evaluation process (95) (259) (79.1%). 257 of this group also submitted responses to the open question, “What activities or exercises do you use to teach information evaluation?” (See our research guide for a list of representative responses.) Do you know anyone who calls him- or herself a Skeptic? n=477 Figure 1. Digital artifacts of the Skeptic community. From top left: Committee for Skeptical InQuiry (a component of the Center for Figure 5. Numbers of respondents (n=477) answering the three
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pod of Jake #67 – Julia Galef Ai-Generated Transcript 1
    POD OF JAKE #67 – JULIA GALEF AI-GENERATED TRANSCRIPT Jake 00:59 Thank you so much, Julia, for taking the time and joining me on the show today. I really appreciate it and looking forward to this conversation for some time. And I've actually listened to your podcast a bunch in the past. Most recently. Yeah, your episode with metallic. So funny must be funny to be on the other side of the microphone. Yeah. But thank you for coming on, I think the best place to get started would be for those who don't know you to tell your story a little bit. And then we'll spend a lot of time talking about your book, which recently came out. Julia Galef 01:29 Sounds good. Thanks, Jake. Yes, it's good to be on the show. My story. Basically, for the last 10 years, I've just been devoted to this question of how do we improve human reasoning and decision making? And really interest in this question, both from a theoretical level? Like how do we think about what would ideal reasoning look like? Just almost philosophically, and also, just from a practical level? Like, what are the kinds of mistakes that the human brain tends to make and what kinds of situations and getting really into a lot of the cognitive science literature and kind of experimenting on real people like trying out techniques and seeing how well they work and, you know, talking to people about their experiences, noticing their own biases and things like that.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating Skepticism Science Based Healthcare Conspiracy Theories a New Chair-Entity Skeptical Desiderata the Kardashian Index Good Germs and Bad Germs
    Communicating skepticism Science Based Healthcare Conspiracy theories A new Chair-entity Skeptical Desiderata The Kardashian Index Good germs and bad germs number 113 – spring 2014 content editorial Communicating skepticism or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the Media 3 Thanks for all the fish Society for Science Based Healthcare – up and running 8 T’S about 25 years since I joined the NZ Skeptics, and eight years since I took on the editorship of this magazine. It’s been fun, Book Review: The Orphan I Conspiracies 10 but it’s time I handed the NZ Skeptic on to other hands, so this will be my last issue as editor. Thank-you to all who have contributed Newsfront 12 over the years; together we’ve covered a lot of ground. I thought Skeptical Desiderata 15 I’d indulge myself a little here by looking back over past issues and some of the material in them. Interview with the entity 16 Yet another science metric Some topics never go away. Alternative medicine remains as – the Kardashian Index 18 popular as ever, and mediums are still fleecing the vulnerable and the grieving. Others, such as crop circles, may emerge, prosper for a Forum 20 time and then fade. A few may morph in unexpected and occasion- From the vaults: Group wants ally alarming directions. Hypnotic regression started out as a means cash to fight ritual abuse 21 of ‘discovering’ a person’s past lives or alien abduction experiences Survival in a bacterial (see p 5) but became more sinister when subjects began to report world 22 instances of satanic ritual abuse and, later (coupled with flawed inter- rogations of children), more conventional forms of sexual abuse (see NZ Skeptic 50, this issue p 21).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 15, Number 2 March-April 2021
    Volume 15, Number 2 March-April 2021 thereasoner.org ISSN 1757-0522 list. (Those were “Decision Theory without Representa- Contents tion Theorems” in 2014, published in Philosophers’ Imprint, and “Dr. Truthlove or: How I Learned to Stop Worry- Guest Editorial 9 ing and Love Bayesian Probabilities” in 2015, published in Noˆus.) Anyone interested in the social epistemology of math Features 9 should know Kenny’s work too: his “Probabilistic Proofs and Transferability” (Philosophia Mathematica, 2009) and News 14 “Rebutting and Undercutting in Mathematics” (Philosophi- cal Perspectives, 2015) are classics and personal favorites. What’s Hot in . 14 Kenny and I first crossed paths Events 15 at a conference in Paris while I Courses and Programmes 15 was a grad student. He joined my dissertation committee a little Jobs and Studentships 16 after that. Fortunately, Kenny is an easy person to keep in touch with: just go to any random phi- losophy conference and there’s a 63% chance he’s there. As you’ll see from our interview, he’s a terri- bly interesting person and a credit Guest Editorial to the profession. I’m happy to of- fer you his opinions on fractal mu- Salutations, reasoners. I’m delighted to be guest editor for this sic, Zoom conferences, being a good referee, teaching in math issue, featuring an interview with the man, the myth, the leg- and philosophy, the rationalist community and its relationship end, Kenny Easwaran. Kenny is a newly-minted Professor of to academia, decision-theoretic pluralism, and the city of Man- Philosophy at Texas A&M University.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-03-March-Sacram
    Special Events Volume 1, Issue 3 March 2013 Fri Mar 1 Movie n Pizza at Sierra College Darwin Day Gala a Success! Fri Mar 1 SAAF meeting and discussion We honored science and the greatest scientific dis- Sat Mar 2 Little Free Library planning covery, natural selection. Lots of tables, including Sun Mar 3 Ancient Chris- ACLU, local groups, Camp Quest, sale of Darwin tian Study Group finger puppets, four electric cars were displayed, the Wed Mar 6 New Member Coffee Meetup Mockingbirds sang sciencey songs in great harmony, Sat Mar 9 SF National and everyone had plenty of cake! Atheist Party Conf. Sat Mar 9 Stockton Dr. Ivan Schwab made interesting points about the eye: Brunch and Atheism Sun Mar 10 Dinosaur Day 1. We needed a ‘file cabinet’ to handle so much sensory Science Fest input, so the brain developed after the eye, not before. Sun Mar 10 Modesto 2. Eyes started when creatures were still ocean dwell- Science on Screen Sun Mar 10 “Hope After ers. That's why our eyes Faith” - Jerry Dewitt need constant lid flap- Fri Mar 15 Stockton ping to keep them wet. Drinking Skeptically Sat Mar 16 Ask an 3. Eyes started as a pro- Atheist - St. Pat’s Parade tein source, using sun- Sat Mar 16 Potluck Game light for energy. Later came a reaction for move- Night Sun Mar 17 JoAnn Anglin ment away from sudden shadows. Poetry Topics 4. Many types of eyes still exist, many much better Sun Mar 17 Blasphemy Breakfast - Rocklin than ours. Some see infrared, like snakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Qanon • 75 Years of the Bomb • Vaccine History • Raising
    SQANON • K75 YEARS OF ETHE BOMB P• VACCINE HISTORYT • RAISINGI CTHE DEAD? Extraordinary Claims, Revolutionary Ideas & the Promotion of Science—Vol.25Science—Vol.25 No.4No.4 2020 $6.95 USA and Canada www.skeptic.com • WHAT IS QANON? • HOW QANON RECYCLES CENTURIES-OLD CONSPIRACY BELIEFS • HOW QANON HURTS THEIR OWN CAUSE • QANON IN CONSPIRATORIAL CONTEXT watch or listen for free Hear leading scientists, scholars, and thinkers discuss the most important issues of our time. Hosted by Michael Shermer. #146 Dr. DonalD Prothero— # 130 Dr. DeBra Soh—the end # 113 Dave ruBIn— # 106 Dr. DanIel ChIrot— Weird earth: Debunking Strange of Gender: Debunking the Myths Don’t Burn this Book: you Say you Want a revolution? Ideas about our Planet about Sex & Identity in our Society thinking for yourself in an radical Idealism and its tragic age of unreason Consequences #145 GreG lukIanoff—Mighty # 129 Dr. Mona Sue WeISSMark Ira: the aClu’s controversial involve- —the Science of Diversity # 112 ann Druyan—Cosmos: # 105 Dr. DIana PaSulka— ment in the Skokie case of 1977. Possible Worlds. how science and american Cosmic: ufos, # 128 MIChael ShellenBerGer civilization grew up together religion, and technology #144 Dr. aGuStIn fuenteS— —apocalypse never: Why environ- Why We Believe: evolution and the mental alarmism hurts us all human Way of Being # 127 Dr. WIllIaM Perry and #143 Dr. nICholaS ChrIStakIS— toM CollIna—the Button: the apollo’s arrow: the Profound and new nuclear arms race and Presi- enduring Impact of Coronavirus on dential Power from truman to trump the Way We live # 126 Sarah SColeS—they are #142 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Communities Jules Evans and Thomas Dixon Background
    Connected Communities Philosophical Communities Jules Evans and Thomas Dixon Background Executive Summary Researchers and Project Partners Grassroots philosophy groups have Project leads proliferated in the UK, the US and beyond Jules Evans over the last 15 years. This is in part thanks Policy Director, Centre for the History to social networking websites like meetup. of the Emotions, Queen Mary, University com and Facebook, which have made it of London. easier for organisers to publicise their groups: there are now 846 philosophy Thomas Dixon groups on meetup.com alone, some of Director, Centre for the History of them with thousands of members. Today, the Emotions, Queen Mary, University philosophy groups meet in pubs, cafes, of London. bookstores, parks, old people’s homes, Project partners prisons, in virtual worlds and elsewhere. Such groups challenge formal models Jonathan Rowson of education and traditional divisions Director of the Social Brain Centre, RSA between high and mass culture, and Charles Seaford affirm the public’s appetite for informal Head of the Centre for Well-Being, new philosophical discussion. economics foundation This project examines and promotes the Paul Doran contemporary rise of grassroots philosophy National Director, Philosophy in Pubs groups. The project’s outputs consist of a David R. Buchanan 30,000-word research report, a seminar, Director, Institute for Global Health and a website (www.thephilosophyhub.com), and has generated over 20 media articles Seminar participants and interviews so far. The report seeks to Steve Bramall map the landscape of grassroots philosophy SBA groups, and to bring together existing research findings and resources regarding Lizzy Lewis those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Skepticism 2.0
    Skepticism 2.0 D.J. GROTHE hen Carl Sagan, James Randi, Paul Kurtz, Martin from CSICOP’s own magazine subscriber lists. Groups were Gardner, Ray Hyman, and others came together formed in the Washington, DC, and Los Angeles regions and W in the mid-1970s to form the Committee for the in a number of other cities around the U.S. and abroad. A Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Para normal (CSICOP, movement, not merely a magazine, was beginning to form. now CSI), did they plan on starting a worldwide grassroots In recent years, new developments in technology and soci- critical-thinking movement? Did they craft a plan to deputize ety have allowed this skeptical movement to reach out in new everyday people to speak out in their communities about the directions, sometimes departing from tested ways of advancing prevailing nonsensical ideas of the day? Did they envision the skeptical outlook that have worked in the past. This is the young people meeting up regularly to be skeptical together, as next generation of skepticism. This is Skepticism 2.0. in the growing Skeptics in the Pub events in cities across North America and around the world? New Media for New Audiences Often citing inspiration from the founders of CSI, an “aver- age Joe” skeptical citizen, possibly without special training or background in skepticism and with the help of only a computer connected to the Internet, can reach out to an audience that the skeptical magazines and organizations never would have reached I doubt it. These men had the laudable ambition to orga- nize leading think ers and social critics to respond authorita- tively to growing trends of credulity in society: increased belief in the power of psychics, the phenomenon of Uri Geller, UFO beliefs, ancient astronaut theories, popular belief in ghost hauntings and channeling, faith healers and religious charla- tans, and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Debate on Science Issues Myths of Child Psychology
    Superbug Crisis | Ten Tactics for Skepticism | Claims of Chi | Fake Bomb Detectors the Magazine for Science and Reason Vol. 41 No. 1 | January/February 2017 Public Debate on Project Science Greenglow Issues Creationism Myths of in Europe Child Psychology Doubt and American Fears Uncertainty Survey INTRODUCTORY PRICE U.S. and Canada $5.99 Skepticism Is Nonpartisan Published by the Center for Inquiry in association with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Robyn E. Blumner, CEO Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Bar ry Karr, Ex ec u tive Di rect or Benjamin Radford, Research Fellow Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow www.csicop.org Fellows James E. Al cock*, psy chol o gist, York Univ., Tor on to Mur ray Gell-Mann, pro fes sor of phys ics, San ta Fe In sti tute; Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA Mar cia An gell, MD, former ed i tor-in-chief, No bel lau re ate Lor en Pan kratz, psy chol o gist, Or e gon Health New Eng land Jour nal of Med i cine Thom as Gi lov ich, psy chol o gist, Cor nell Univ. Sci en ces Univ. Kimball Atwood IV, MD, physician; author; Newton, MA David H. Gorski, cancer surgeon and re searcher at Barbara Robert L. Park, professor of physics, Univ. of Maryland Steph en Bar rett, MD, psy chi a trist; au thor; con sum er ad vo cate, Ann Kar manos Cancer Institute and chief of breast surgery Jay M. Pasachoff, Field Memorial Professor of Al len town, PA section, Wayne State University School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Regression to Fundamentalist Religion As an Inadequate Defense Against Growing Environmental Complexity
    Paper prepared for the sessions of the Research Committee on Sociocybernetics at the 16th World Congress of Sociology, July 23-29, 2006 in Durban, South Africa THE "WAR ON TERROR" AND "THE FUTURE OF AN ILLUSION": REGRESSION TO FUNDAMENTALIST RELIGION AS AN INADEQUATE DEFENSE AGAINST GROWING ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY FELIX GEYER, [email protected] DRAFT VERSION, NOT YET TO BE QUOTED! 1. INTRODUCTION: In this paper we will argue that the present period of rapidly increasing environmental complexity and interdependence tends to increase feelings of insecurity caused by a lack of environment mastery, in both the developed Western world and the largely underdeveloped Muslim world. This will be the case especially in the less educated parts of the population, where it will stimulate an upsurge of religion, especially its fundamentalist versions. In my last few papers I have dealt, directly or indirectly, with the overwhelming political and economic1 reasons for the war on terror 2 and the leading role of the US in that war 3, in this paper attention will therefore be directed to these religious aspects, both on the Muslim side and on the US-Christian side, and to the functions of religion as such in the 21st-century world. For a thorough understanding of the following, nearly all you might ever want to know about terrorism from the Muslim side can be found by thoroughly looking at the PowerPoint presentations – and if you are interested in the subject also the papers - of the participants in a 2004 Suicide Terrorism Conference in Washington. 4 A recent MIT study complements these findings.5 The main points of these presentations will be discussed later.
    [Show full text]
  • How Religiously Neutral Are the Anti-Creationist Organisations?
    How Religiously Neutral are the Anti‐Creationist Organisations? Two case studies by Don Batten and Jonathan Sarfati 1) USA’s so‐called ‘National Center for Science Education’ In NCSE Reports 15(2):9, 1995, the Executive director, Eugenie C. Scott, protests against Dr John Morris of the Institute for Creation Research saying the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) is ‘an offshoot of the American Humanist Association’. Scott claims confusion could possibly be due to NCSE's journal, Creation/Evolution, being started by the American Humanist Association (AHA) and initially edited by the executive director of the AHA, Frederick Edwords (a philosopher, not a scientist). The journal ‘was later sold by AHA to NCSE’, says Scott. Although humanism is an atheistic religious belief, Scott claims that NCSE was intended from the start to ‘be a religiously‐neutral organization focusing on science and education’. Scott says that NCSE has members from all sorts of religious persuasions, including ‘conservative evangelical Christians’. NCSE is supposedly just interested in ‘science education’. However, it seems strange that the only ‘science education’ NCSE seems interested in is evolution; not chemistry, physics, astronomy, or even experimental biology. ‘Science’ seems to be a euphemism for ‘evolution’, certainly nothing to do with the operational science that put men on the moon, cured diseases, etc. In NCSE Reports 16(1):7, 1996, readers are directed to an article ‘on our web site at http://www.csicop.org’. This is the Skeptics' (USA) web site, the ‘Science and Reason Site’, as the Skeptics claim, which overtly espouses materialism (atheism) with direct links to the Council for Secular Humanism and other atheistic / anti‐Christian sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Freethought Volume 1 No
    The Tampa Bay Coalition of Reason Freethought Volume 1 No. 5 Oct. 2012 Jim Peterson, Editor ews N What’s Inside? It Is Time for Secular Humanists to Run for Faith Unified Calendar… ... ... 2 is a Humanist Value Humanist Society…... 3 * Public Office Faith? ...in Humanism? Yes, actually. Not in Tampa Humanists…. 7 * By Paul Kurtz, Ruth Mitchell, Toni Van Pelt, and deities or superstitions of course, but in ourselves as human beings; and in each other. Faith in human Clr.UU-Humanists… 7 * Tom Flynn potential, confidence in the instruments of reason Post Carbon Council..8 As secular humanists, we live in this world here and and logic; in the value of the world we have created; Freethought Films…..9 now, not in an imaginary world beyond our lives. these are the basis of real hope. This is faith carved This is our place, and it can only be better if we take in the immutable granite of human history. We Humanist Families…. 10 * responsibility for it. The Council for Secular embrace both Mozart and Stalin, the ugliness and Americans United..… 10 Humanism and the Center for Inquiry are committed horror, the beauty and delight. For they are both an to a set of humanist ethical values, many of which expression of the human, and define for better or Military Atheists.….10 * can be fulfilled only by social and political action worse, our possibilities. Though we are not shaped Atheists of FL ……..11 * for which we need to take responsibility. as passive stone, our character is chiseled in the Ctr.
    [Show full text]
  • +Dragons, Brains &Energy
    SKEPTICISM . SCIENCE . SOCIETY Vol. 36, No 3. September 2016 Risks & Stats What Skeptics need to know +Dragons, Brains & Energy Australian Skeptics . www.skeptics.com.au Skeptic_Cover_SEP16.indd 1 30/08/2016 1:22 pm The Skeptic September 16 Skeptical Groups in Australia NSW VIC Australian Skeptics Inc – Eran Segev Australian Skeptics (Vic) Inc – Chris Guest www.skeptics.com.au GPO Box 5166, Melbourne VIC 3001 PO Box 20, Beecroft, NSW 2119 Tel: 1 800 666 996 [email protected] Tel: 02 8094 1894; Mob: 0432 713 195; Fax: (02) 8088 4735 Skeptics’ Café – Third Monday of every month, with guest [email protected] speaker. La Notte, 140 Lygon St. Meal from 6pm, speaker at 8pm Sydney Skeptics in the Pub – 6pm first Thursday of each sharp. More details on our web site www.skeptics.com.au/vic month at the Crown Hotel, cnr Goulburn and Elizabeth Streets in the city (meeting upstairs) Dinner meetings are held on a regular basis. Ballarat Skeptics Currently being re-activated. See Facebook for details Hunter Skeptics – John Turner Tel: (02) 4959 6286 [email protected] Citizens for Science - Mornington Peninsula (formerly Peninsula Skeptics, aka The Celestial Teapot) Meetings are held at the Club Macquarie, Lake Road, Argenton Contact: Graeme Hanigan 0438 359 600 on the second Thursday of each month, excepting January, http://www.meetup.com/Citizens-for-Science/ commencing 7.00pm, with a guest speaker or open discussion www.facebook.com/groups/peninsula.skeptics/ on a given topic. Visitors welcome. Further information from the secretary
    [Show full text]