DOCSLIB.ORG

Boatman's Quarterly Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boatman's Quarterly Review boatman’s quarterly review Larry Stevens . 1 99 – 1998 number 12 the journal of winter volume Grand Canyon River Guides, Inc Questionnaires & Responses Science: Point – Counterpoint Grand Canyon Supergroup And A Translation Thereof Gts, GCROA, AMWG, etc. Book Views and Reviews And Another Thing... Announcements Wilderness Words Adopt-A-Beach Cover Your A ’m a biologist. My third memory, when I was three, is of my mother pointing at a patch of bark on a maple tree in Cleveland. I was just a little kid, just looking at bark. But Thanks Ishe moved her finger, and an underwing moth that was camouflaged against the tree Poetry fluttered its wings in a bright flash of red and black. That image of life erupting out of the insensate background stands out very clearly in my early life. It was my first entomological NPS encounter and there has been no doubt at any point in my life as to my love of living crea- tures, extending to all life in a very direct way. I have never questioned that love. Interview on page 34 And Another Thing… When traveling to a new country, it is a gift to have a guide. They know the nuances of the world they live in. [We] trust [their] instincts and borrow them until [we] uncover [our] own. But there is danger here. One can become lazy in the reli- ance on a guide. The burden of the newcomer is to pay attention. Terry Tempest Williams An Unspoken Hunger ACK IN NOVEMBER, I was asked to articulate Grand in Grand Canyon use concessioned services, so why Canyon River Guides’ position on the Wilder- shouldn’t river trips be similar? There is a distinction. Bness issue to a group of people discussing it for Everyone can walk, not everyone can run a boat. Back- Grand Canyon. While I was unable to say that we had packers are usually desirous of a more solitary experience, a clear position on the issue, I could express some of and are often on a quest or a challenge to themselves our fears and concerns. One of those revolves around a and do not want or need the services of a guide. People constant and pervasive claim put forth by many private going on river trips are consciously entering a truly alien boaters (and sadly, some commercial guides as well)— environment and often prefer to be guided (let’s face it, that commercial river trips are unnecessary given the moving water often frightens us as humans). We cannot number of people willing and able to go downriver compare apples to oranges in this case. without concessioned services. There is a fear that all of I read a letter in the recent Grand Canyon Private the CRMP proceedings and Boaters’ Association the Wilderness debate are newsletter The Waiting a thinly-veiled attempt to List that claimed “I know do away with commercial that the quality of my trip boating in Grand Canyon. far surpassed the quality We can (and should) of a commercial trip…” debate how expensive And another statement these trips should be, in a recent High Country whether they should have News article that stated motors or last 4 days or “to go really deep, you 14, how to get private need to go on a private boaters on the river trip.” Unequivocal, quicker, possible changes narrow-minded and in allocation ratios and simplistic statements like how to provide access for this annoy me. They make educational groups, youth organizations and others. But me write long-winded articles like this. Certainly, we on the problem I see is that all these issues are becoming commercial trips are not all exploring and experiencing synonymous with “commercial trips.” If something is the river for the first time together as is the case on many wrong with the system, it’s very convenient to make it private trips. Yes, we provide a safety net, an element of the industry’s fault, especially with talented and well- “cush” that a self-outfitted trip may not have. But these outfitted private trips to hold up as examples of people things do not take away from the experience for our who don’t need the services of the commercial industry. guests. Because they do not have to worry about whether I emphasized at the meeting, and do so here as well, they will find a camp, eat well (or soon), make it through that commercial boating in Grand Canyon is extremely this or that rapid, because someone else is taking care of important, serves a purpose distinct from that of non- the details, these people are free to truly let go and go far commercial trips, and is invaluable to the public whom “deeper” than one might imagine. These postal workers, we serve. Neither type of trip is “better” and we need and doctors, teachers and students, these accountants both on this river. Most of our people come because and lawyers, writers and computer jockeys, these home- they want and need guided services, not because they makers, teenagers, nurses and film makers, these actors, haven’t time to wait for a non-commercial permit. The musicians, carpenters and policemen are free to become vast majority of commercial clients choose these trips some of the things they used to be as children, or never because they have neither the knowledge, experience, have been and always wanted to be. connections or desire to go privately. Because a large part of a commercial river trip We hear constantly how only 10% of backpackers involves education—about geology, archaeology, conser- page 2 grand canyon river guides vation, history, ecology, Native Americans—many of gift that shines no less brightly and has affected them our guests come off a Grand Canyon trip beginning to no less deeply just because it was paid for with a credit see their world with truly different eyes. As a teacher I’ve card. learned that there is no better way to help people learn to care for this planet than by helping them understand Christa how it works, understand the connections between all living things. These people come to us open and ready for anything. Certainly, they may have expectations, and at the start many are just there for a vacation, but most of them leave with something far greater than that. They leave with a sense of the natural world, and a sense boatman’s quarterly review of history—theirs and other people’s. They take home the confidence and joy that comes from climbing that …is published more or less quarterly waterfall by themselves, completing that hike, living by and for Grand Canyon River Guides. outdoors under the stars. As guides, we do not do this for them. We may show them the best ways to climb, or Grand Canyon River Guides is a nonprofit organization dedicated to give them an idea of where to put their feet, but before long, they are doing it themselves. Having someone * Protecting Grand Canyon * there to help, having someone who can still look up * Setting the highest standards for the river profession * in awe and say “Wow—would you look at that!” after * Celebrating the unique spirit of the river community * having seen it 50 or 100 times before helps our guests * Providing the best possible river experience * look at the Canyon in a new light as well. A good guide will not do everything for the guests. A good guide will General Meetings are held each Spring and Fall. Our show them how to pay attention, the rest is up to them. Board of Directors Meetings are held the first Monday of After reading Brad Dimock’s article in the recent each month. All innocent bystanders are urged to attend. High Country News, I too felt sad at the changes that I Call for details. have seen in the industry in just 12 years. The restric- Officers tions and arguments of the late ’90s make the late ’80s President Christa Sadler look free and simple—I can’t even imagine the ’70s. Vice President Bob Grusy Some people say our guests have changed, become too Secretary/Treasurer Lynn Hamilton soft, too demanding—experience collectors instead of Directors Mary Ellen Arndorfer adventurers. Some people say the price of our trips is Nicole Corbo too high, the excess too great. They say the industry has Chris Geanious gotten too fat, too entrenched. The young, poor and Jon Hirsh disabled are disenfranchised. Yes motors, no motors, Jeff Pomeroy shorter trips, longer trips, pee in this cup, wash your Lynn Roeder hands, jet skis, helicopters, more people, less people… it gets overwhelming at times, doesn’t it? But if some Our editorial policy, such as it is: provide an open things could be changed in the industry does not mean forum. We need articles, poetry, stories, drawings, photos, the industry has outlived its purpose or its value. opinions, suggestions, gripes, comics, etc. Opinions No one is saying that non-commercial trips are less expressed are not necessarily those of Grand Canyon River valuable or don’t deserve a fair shot at getting on the Guides, Inc. river in a reasonable time frame. Perhaps they even Written submissions should be less than 1500 words deserve a greater share of the pie. That will be decided and, if possible, be sent on a computer disk, pc or mac soon enough. But the current rhetoric sailing through format; Microsoft Word files are best but we can translate the air these days is so confusing that people are most programs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of the Nankoweap Rapids Area, Marble Canyon, Arizona
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP 1-2608 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QUATERNARY GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE NANKOWEAP RAPIDS AREA, MARBLE CANYON, ARIZONA By Richard Hereford, Kelly J. Burke, and Kathryn S. Thompson INTRODUCTION sion elsewhere in Grand Canyon {Hereford and oth­ ers, 1993; Fairley and others, 1994, p. 147-150). The Nankoweap Rapids area along the Colorado River {fig. 1) is near River Mile 52 {that is 52 mi or 83 km downstream of Lees Ferry, Arizona) in Grand Canyon National Park {west bank) and the Navajo METHODS Indian Reservation {east bank). Geologic mapping and [See map sheet for Description of Map Units] related field investigations of the late Quaternary geo­ morphology of the Colorado River and tributary A variety of methods were used to date the de­ streams were undertaken to provide information about posits. Radiocarbon dates were obtained from char­ the age, distribution, and origin of surficial deposits. coal and wood recovered from several of the mapped These deposits, particularly sandy alluvium and closely units (table 1). Several of these dates are not defini­ related debris-flow sediment, are the substrate for tive as they are affected by extensive animal bur­ riparian vegetation, which in turn supports the eco­ rowing in the alluvial deposits that redistributed burnt system of the Colorado River (Carothers and Brown, roots of mesquite trees, giving anomalous dates. The 1991, p. 111-167). late Pleistocene breccia (units be and bf) and re­ Closure of Glen Canyon Dam {109 km or 68 lated terraces were dated by Machette and Rosholt mi upstream of the study area) in 1963 and subse­ (1989; 1991) using the uranium-trend method.
    [Show full text]
  • Sell-1536, Field Trip Notes, , MILS
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon The Paleozoic Era spans about 250 Myrs of Earth History from 541 Ma to 254 Ma (Figure 1). Within Grand Canyon National Park, there is a fragmented record of this time, which has undergone little to no deformation. These still relatively flat-lying, stratified layers, have been the focus of over 100 years of geologic studies. Much of what we know today began with the work of famed naturalist and geologist, Edwin Mckee (Beus and Middleton, 2003). His work, in addition to those before and after, have led to a greater understanding of sedimentation processes, fossil preservation, the evolution of life, and the drastic changes to Earth’s climate during the Paleozoic. This paper seeks to summarize, generally, the Paleozoic strata, the environments in which they were deposited, and the sources from which the sediments were derived. Tapeats Sandstone (~525 Ma – 515 Ma) The Tapeats Sandstone is a buff colored, quartz-rich sandstone and conglomerate, deposited unconformably on the Grand Canyon Supergroup and Vishnu metamorphic basement (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Thickness varies from ~100 m to ~350 m depending on the paleotopography of the basement rocks upon which the sandstone was deposited. The base of the unit contains the highest abundance of conglomerates. Cobbles and pebbles sourced from the underlying basement rocks are common in the basal unit. Grain size and bed thickness thins upwards (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Common sedimentary structures include planar and trough cross-bedding, which both decrease in thickness up-sequence. Fossils are rare but within the upper part of the sequence, body fossils date to the early Cambrian (Middleton and Elliott, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND CANYON GUIDE No. 6
    GRAND CANYON GUIDE no. 6 ... excerpted from Grand Canyon Explorer … Bob Ribokas AN AMATEUR'S REVIEW OF BACKPACKING TOPICS FOR THE T254 - EXPEDITION TO THE GRAND CANYON - MARCH 2007 Descriptions of Grand Canyon Layers Grand Canyon attracts the attention of the world for many reasons, but perhaps its greatest significance lies in the geologic record that is so beautifully preserved and exposed here. The rocks at Grand Canyon are not inherently unique; similar rocks are found throughout the world. What is unique about the geologic record at Grand Canyon is the great variety of rocks present, the clarity with which they're exposed, and the complex geologic story they tell. Paleozoic Strata: Kaibab depositional environment: Kaibab Limestone - This layer forms the surface of the Kaibab and Coconino Plateaus. It is composed primarily of a sandy limestone with a layer of sandstone below it. In some places sandstone and shale also exists as its upper layer. The color ranges from cream to a greyish-white. When viewed from the rim this layer resembles a bathtub ring and is commonly referred to as the Canyon's bathtub ring. Fossils that can be found in this layer are brachiopods, coral, mollusks, sea lilies, worms and fish teeth. Toroweap depositional environment Toroweap Formation - This layer is composed of pretty much the same material as the Kaibab Limestone above. It is darker in color, ranging from yellow to grey, and contains a similar fossil history. Coconino depositional environment: Coconino Sandstone - This layer is composed of pure quartz sand, which are basically petrified sand dunes. Wedge-shaped cross bedding can be seen where traverse-type dunes have been petrified.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) by W.C
    NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) By W.C. Butler INTRODUCTION This province covers about 59,000 sq mi, mostly in the southwestern part of the Colorado Plateau. Significant geologic features include the Grand Canyon, Kaibab Arch, Mogollon Highlands transition zone, Monument Uplift, Defiance Uplift, Black Mesa Basin, Holbrook Basin, and southern edges of the Kaiparowits and Blanding Basins. The stratigraphic section shown for northeastern Arizona has demonstrated the highest petroleum potential in Arizona. See Wilson (1962), Butler (1988a), and Dickinson (1989) for synopses of the province's geology and evolution. The lithologically and structurally complex basement of the Colorado Plateau area evolved from northwest-younging Proterozoic terranes sequentially accreted onto the Archean craton. As much as 12,000 ft of Middle and Late Proterozoic strata is preserved in possible rift-aulacogen depositional settings in central Arizona. Thick, unmetamorphosed, organic-rich Late Proterozoic strata deposited in backarc basins or continental lakes of north-central Arizona and south-central Utah have good petroleum potential. The plateau area, as a passive Paleozoic plate margin and buffered Mesozoic retro-arc platform, has been remarkably tectonically stable during Phanerozoic time. The area is characterized by blanket Paleozoic strata, as much as 6,000 ft thick, consisting of mostly shallow marine clastics and carbonates showing numerous disconformities. These strata accumulated during transgressions and regressions from both the northwest and southeast, onlapping and thinning toward the trans-continental arch – a northeast-trending positive area extending from the northeast into central Arizona. Convergence between North and South American tectonic plates, with reactivation of basement blocks, during the late Paleozoic created the plateau's fault-bounded basins and uplifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon
    U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Investigations Series I–2688 14 Version 1.0 4 U.S. Geological Survey 167.5 1 BIG SPRINGS CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS LIST OF MAP UNITS 4 Pt Ph Pamphlet accompanies map .5 Ph SURFICIAL DEPOSITS Pk SURFICIAL DEPOSITS SUPAI MONOCLINE Pk Qr Holocene Qr Colorado River gravel deposits (Holocene) Qsb FAULT CRAZY JUG Pt Qtg Qa Qt Ql Pk Pt Ph MONOCLINE MONOCLINE 18 QUATERNARY Geologic Map of the Pleistocene Qtg Terrace gravel deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Pc Pk Pe 103.5 14 Qa Alluvial deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Pt Pc VOLCANIC ROCKS 45.5 SINYALA Qti Qi TAPEATS FAULT 7 Qhp Qsp Qt Travertine deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Grand Canyon ၧ DE MOTTE FAULT Pc Qtp M u Pt Pleistocene QUATERNARY Pc Qp Pe Qtb Qhb Qsb Ql Landslide deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Qsb 1 Qhp Ph 7 BIG SPRINGS FAULT ′ × ′ 2 VOLCANIC DEPOSITS Dtb Pk PALEOZOIC SEDIMENTARY ROCKS 30 60 Quadrangle, Mr Pc 61 Quaternary basalts (Pleistocene) Unconformity Qsp 49 Pk 6 MUAV FAULT Qhb Pt Lower Tuckup Canyon Basalt (Pleistocene) ၣm TRIASSIC 12 Triassic Qsb Ph Pk Mr Qti Intrusive dikes Coconino and Mohave Counties, Pe 4.5 7 Unconformity 2 3 Pc Qtp Pyroclastic deposits Mr 0.5 1.5 Mၧu EAST KAIBAB MONOCLINE Pk 24.5 Ph 1 222 Qtb Basalt flow Northwestern Arizona FISHTAIL FAULT 1.5 Pt Unconformity Dtb Pc Basalt of Hancock Knolls (Pleistocene) Pe Pe Mၧu Mr Pc Pk Pk Pk NOBLE Pt Qhp Qhb 1 Mၧu Pyroclastic deposits Qhp 5 Pe Pt FAULT Pc Ms 12 Pc 12 10.5 Lower Qhb Basalt flows 1 9 1 0.5 PERMIAN By George H.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Supergroup, Northern Arizona
    Unconformity at the Cardenas-Nankoweap contact (Precambrian), Grand Canyon Supergroup, northern Arizona DONALD P. ELSTON I U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 G. ROBERT SCOTT* ' ABSTRACT sedimentary and volcanic rocks about Group (Noble, 1914) and overlying strata 4,000 m thick overlies crystalline basement of the Chuar Group (Ford and Breed, Red-bed strata of the Nankoweap For- rocks (—1.7 b.y. old; Pasteels and Silver, 1973). Because the Nankoweap had not mation unconformably overlie the 1965). These strata, in turn, are overlain by been subdivided into named formations, —l,100-m.y.-old Cardenas Lavas of the sandstone of Early and Middle Cambrian Maxson (1961) reduced the Nankoweap to Unkar Group in the eastern Grand Canyon. age. Near the middle of the series, a 300- formational rank and renamed it the Nan- An unconformity and an apparent discon- m-thick section of basaltic lava flows is un- koweap Formation, a usage herein adopted formity are present. At most places the conformably overlain by about 100 m of (Art. 9a, 15c, American Commission on upper member of the Nankoweap overlies red-brown and purplish sandstone and Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1961). The the Cardenas, and locally an angular dis- siltstone. The lavas — named the Cardenas Grand Canyon Series of Walcott (1894) cordance can be recognized that reflects the Lavas or Cardenas Lava Series by Keyes thus consists of three distinct major units; truncation of 60 m of Cardenas. This un- (1938), and adopted as the Cardenas Lavas they are, in ascending order, the Unkar conformity also underlies a newly recog- by Ford and others (1972) — and the over- Group, Nankoweap Formation, and Chuar nized ferruginous sandstone of probable lying red sandstone were included in the Group; this series is here redesignated the local extent that underlies the upper upper part of Walcott's (1894) Precam- Grand Canyon Supergroup, as current member and that herein is called the fer- brian Unkar terrane.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS General Information Product
    Geologic Field Photograph Map of the Grand Canyon Region, 1967–2010 General Information Product 189 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Billingsley, G.H., Goodwin, G., Nagorsen, S.E., Erdman, M.E., and Sherba, J.T., 2019, Geologic field photograph map of the Grand Canyon region, 1967–2010: U.S. Geological Survey General Information Product 189, 11 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/gip189. ISSN 2332-354X (online) Cover. Image EF69 of the photograph collection showing the view from the Tonto Trail (foreground) toward Indian Gardens (greenery), Bright Angel Fault, and Bright Angel Trail, which leads up to the south rim at Grand Canyon Village. Fault offset is down to the east (left) about 200 feet at the rim.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Aquifer Response Following Forest Restoration And
    ESTIMATING AQUIFER RESPONSE FOLLOWING FOREST RESTORATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE ALONG THE MOGOLLON RIM, NORTHERN ARIZONA By Clinton J. W. Wyatt A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Northern Arizona University May 2013 Approved: Abraham E. Springer, Ph.D., Chair Deborah N. Huntzinger, Ph.D. Peter M. Kroopnick, Ph.D., RG, PH ABSTRACT ESTIMATING AQUIFER RESPONSE FOLLOWING FOREST RESTORATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE ALONG THE MOGOLLON RIM, NORTHERN ARIZONA Clinton J. W. Wyatt Landscape-scale forest restoration treatments are planned for four national forests in Northern Arizona: the Coconino, Kaibab, Tonto, and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests. The first analysis area comprises 900,000 acres on the Coconino and Kaibab National Forests where the U.S. Forest Service is proposing restoration activities on approximately 600,000 acres over a ten year period pending acceptance of an Environmental Impact Statement. These forest restoration treatments are intended to accomplish a number of objectives including reducing the threat of catastrophic wild fire and subsequent flooding and to restore forest health, function, and resiliency. Previous studies suggest that in semi-arid, ponderosa pine watersheds there was a possibility to increase surface water yields 15-40% when basal area was reduced by 30-100%. Because of these results, there is considerable interest in the amount of increased water yield that may recharge from these activities. The objectives of this study were to 1) examine the state of knowledge of forest restoration thinning and its hydrological responses and to evaluate the quality and type of related references that exist within the literature and 2) simulate possible changes in recharge and aquifer response following forest restoration treatments and climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Precambrian to Earliest Mississippian Stratigraphy, Geologic History, and Paleogeography of Northwestern Colorado and West-Central Colorado
    Precambrian to Earliest Mississippian Stratigraphy, Geologic History, and Paleogeography of Northwestern Colorado and West-Central Colorado Prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Geological Survey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1 787-U AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated monthly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Sales, Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents. copies of periodicals (Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary De­ termination of Epicenters), and some miscellaneous reports, includ­ ANCHORAGE, Alaska-4230 University Dr., Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Guide
    Grand Canyon National Park Trail of Time National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Walking Guide Find these markers and find these views along the 2 km (1.2 mile) timeline trail. Each one represents a key time in this region’s geologic history. Yavapai Observation Station and the Park geology brochure have additional information about all the Grand Canyon rock layers. Canyon Carving last 6 million years Colorado River Find the Colorado River deep in the canyon. This mighty river has carved the Grand Canyon in “only” the last six million years. Upper Flat Layers 270–315 million years old Kaibab (KIE-bab) Formation Toroweap (TORO-weep) Formation Coconino (coco-KNEE-no) Sandstone Hermit Formation Supai (SOO-pie) Group You are standing on the top rock layer, called the Kaibab Formation. It was deposited 270 million years ago in a shallow sea. From this point you can see lower (older) layers too. The Trail of Time is a joint project of Grand Canyon National Park, the University of New Mexico, and the National Science Foundation Grand Canyon National Park Trail of Time National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Walking Guide Lowest Flat Layer younger layers above 525 million years old older layers below Tapeats (ta-PEETS) Sandstone Your best view of the Tapeats Sandstone is from marker 590. But it is actually 525 million years old. It is the oldest of the horizontal rock layers, but not the oldest rock in the canyon. Supergroup 742–1,255 million years old Hakatai (HACK-a-tie) Shale Find the bright orange Hakatai Shale.
    [Show full text]