DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparative A COMPARATIVE PHONOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH LALA DIALECTS OF TEKELA NGUNI BY ELPHAS MPHUNYUZWA ZUNGU Ph. D. Dissertation UNISA 1999 A COMPARATIVE PHONOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH LALA DIALECTS OF TEKELA NGUNI BY ELPHAS MPHUNYUZWA ZUNGU Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the Subject: African Languages UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA - PRETORIA Promoter: Prof. C. T. Msimang DECEMBER 1999 DECLARATION I, Elphas Mphunyuzwa Zungu, hereby declare that the dissertation A Comparative Phonological and Morphological Analysis ofthe North and South Lala Dialects of Tekela Nguni is my own work, and the sources utilized have been duly acknowledged by means of references in the body of the study. An earlier draft of the work was submitted for examination in November 1998. The examiners recommended a number of corrections, as well as further research and re-writing of specific sections. This has now been done, hopefully to the examiners' satisfaction. :!! /J d , / . // ,'/. t /1. • . /! • Signed .... ~1..t .. .l.l.l.ul!!/I"································· ') ~- ,_.) A '~) Date ..f~ ,.;;i......... ::: ..t.,. ••• l"; .. :: ..... ~ .. 9. ..r:;~. Q.. "................... 496.3985 ZUNG l r .. ~I~ \I~ \Ill \II\ II I~\~\~~~~ ~I~ II\ 0001767150 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A work such as this requires the co-operation and assistance of many people, too many indeed to mention them all here by name. Their contribution is known to me and treasured in my heart. To them all I say a hearty THANK YOU! I must, however, mention at least some in particular: Professor C.T. Msimang, former head of the Department of African Languages at UNISA, Pretoria, my friendly, knowledgeable and untiring promoter. He has constantly sustained me with his guidance. He has supplied the motivation for the work and the inspiration for aiming at the highest summit of the academic mountain. He was a source of true light and comfort even in my darkest moments of work. To him I say: Thabizolo ungadinwa nangomuso! Professor N.N. Canonici, Professor Emeritus and former head of the Department of Zulu at Natal University in Durban, who had been the supervisor of my M.A. thesis in 1990. He generously accepted to come out of retirement to help me revise the initial draft of this work. He supplied and guided me through some difficult sources of information and in re-thinking and re­ writing the required sections. A word of gratitude also goes to my wife Jabulisile and my five children, Mpendulo, Sinenhlanhla, Nzuzo, Siphelele and Sibongakonke. They allowed me to get on with my research without making too many demands on my time. Also my parents, Mandlakayise and Kotizana, offered their unswerving moral support at all times. I must also express a word of thanks to Mr Z.G. Hadebe, my secondary school class teacher, my former school principal and my present Chief Superintendent of Education Management (Sayidi Disctrict). All my endeavours would have come to nothing without his support. To him I say: Uze ungadinwa nangomuso Hlubi! My last word of gratitude goes to the Buhlebethu High School teachers for their warm, friendly attitude towards me, and their help when I needed it most. I especially thank Mr S.B. Myeni who took the trouble of typing the first draft of the entire work. To you all I say: Umuntu wumuntu ngabantu! 11 SUMMARY This research work has several aims, demanded by a number of external and internal factors. First of all, it aims to identify Lala: whether it is simply a dialect of Tekela- Nguni, or perhaps the substratum Bantu language spoken in the eastern parts of Southern Africa since the fourth century of the first millennium A.D. on which every new migratory wave imposed its language (chapters one and two). The lexical-statistical method has been attempted (chapter three), but with mixed results. In fact, relexification is widely used in southern African societies, and this renders the identification of the core vocabulary a very difficult task. The result is that all that can be said is that Lala indeed shows the characteristics of a Tekela-Nguni language, but it is impossible to determine at this stage whether Lala is the mother or the daughter of Tekela. Another important aim, dictated by an earlier research by Wilkes (1981 ), was to compare the two main branches of Lala, called North and South Lala, to prove whether the differences between the two dialects are so wide as to justify a division into two separate entities or not. Here the verdict is emphatically negative. In fact the various stages of the research abundantly re-affirm the view that Lala is one language, with only marginal differences caused by the different linguistic environments: Zulu in the north and IsiZansi in the south. African societies in this part of the world have affirmed themselves in the realm of the written word only recently, i.e. during the last 150 years or so. The background culture of these societies is still vigorously oral, and this means that the spoken word is used for much more than simple communication of thought and feeling. Language is felt as the major binding element in a society that has seen constant political break-ups, upheavals, migrations, wars, attempted exterminations. This means that Lala, as a language or the dominant dialect of a group, is banded about as a cultural-historical flag around which people are proud to gather. This sense of unity is an emotion, a feeling, rather than a deep reality. The colours of the flag, or the distinguishing elements of the language, may be fading away, and only a core might be preserved. But this is quite enough to kindle emotions and to rally people. At least in areas where people are still proud of their cultural heritage. Ethnicity and language should not be the same, but most of the people interviewed (cf chapter two) felt very strongly that they were Lalas because they spoke Lala; and that they spoke Lala because they are Lalas. Their either glorious or sad histories are recorded in chapter two, lll to demonstrate how Shaka's wars, and the Mfecane, forced them to leave their homeland and to migrate. The trauma of this latest migration is still felt so strongly that it is often superimposed and confused with the great migrations from Central and Western Africa that took place in mythological times, or very long ago. But through their histories, they keep alive their memories and the certainty of the unity of the Lala nation, even though it is now spread from Kranskop to Harding and IZingolweni. Chapter four examines the phonetics and phonology of the two Lala dialects in the context of Swati and Zulu. Lala is a Tekela dialect indeed, but with its own phonetic and phonological peculiarities. The same can be said with regard to the research exposed in chapter five, on the morphology of Lala compared to Swati and Zulu. The grammatical system among the three languages is extremely similar, and there is hardly any substantial difference between North and South Lala. This can also be said with regard to tonology (chapter six). The last chapter reflects on what has been achieved. The ancient Lala language, about which James Stuart stated in the 1920's that it was nearly extinct, is proving very strong and resilient. Possibly the very dynamism experienced in its ability to adapt to the colonial languages and the new material culture by assimilating many foreign lexical items, and that South Lala has adopted many words from IsiZansi, is proof that Lala has got a life of its own that cannot be taken for granted, nor extinguished. The more one is able to study the local languages, the more one dusts up some ancient treasure that needs to be admired and constantly re-valued. The functional word here is 'treasure': because all languages, as carriers of culture, are a treasure that together form the mosaic of our beautiful "Rainbow Nation". IV TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter one INTRODUCTORY PERSPECTIVE 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 The Lala speaking people 1 1.2 Review of existing literature 3 1.3 Aim and scope of research 8 1.4 Definition of important terms 9 1.4.1 Nguni 10 1.4.2 Lala 10 1.4.3 Language and dialect 11 1.4.4 Phonological analysis 13 1.4.5 Morphological analysis 14 1.5 Research methodology 14 1.6 Conclusion 16 Chapter two HISTORY OF THE LALA PEOPLE 2.0 Introduction 17 2.1 Lala pre-history 17 2.2 The Ngcolosi Lalas 22 2.3 History of the so-called South Lalas 25 2.3.1 The EmaBheleni lineage 25 2.3.2 The Bombo lineage 27 2.3.3 The ENyavwini lineage 29 2.3.4 History of the Hlongwa lineage 30 2.3.5 History of the Luthuli lineage 33 2.3.6 History of the Qwabe lineage 35 2.3.7 History of the second Qwabe lineage at UMzumbe 37 2.3.8 History of the UMzumbe amaChiliza 38 2.4 Conclusion 39 Note: The Name UMZUMBE 41 Chapter three BASIC LEXICAL COMPARISONS 3.0 Introduction 42 3.1 Core vocabulary 43 3.2 Vocabulary list No 2 47 3.3 Conclusion 52 v Chapter four COMPARATIVE PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF NORTH AND SOUTH LALA 4.0 Introduction 54 4.1 Phones, phonemes, allophones 54 4.2 Vowels 56 4.2.1 Lala oral vowels 56 4.2.2 Lala nasalised vowels 57 4.2.3 Lala vowel chart 58 4.3 Consonants 59 4.3.1 Labials 59 4.3.2 Alveolars 60 4.3.3 Prepalatals 61 4.3.4 Velars 62 4.3.5 Glottals 62 4.3.6 Clicks 63 4.4 Phonetic differences 65 4.5 Morpho-phonological processes 66 4.5.1 Vowel replacement 67 4.5.2 Vowel elision 68 4.5.3 Consonant substitution - consonantalisation 69 4.5.4 Consonant insertion 70 4.5.5 Vowel assimilation 71 4.6 Murmuring 74 4.7 Conclusion 74 Chapter five A COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF NORTH AND SOUTH LALA 5.0 Introduction 76 5.1 Morphology, morphemes, morphs, allomorphs 76 5.2 The noun 77 5.2.1 The noun prefix 78 5.2.2 Chart of noun prefixes 78 5.2.3 Exemplification of Lala nouns 81 5.2.4 Noun prefix as gender marker 83 5.2.5 Adoptives in Lala 84 5.2.6 Derivation: Nouns derived from other parts of speech 86 5.2.7 Diminutive derivation 89 5.2.8 Nouns formed by stem reduplication 90 5.2.9 Prefixal formatives ma-, so- and no-.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of the Witwatersrand
    UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND AFRICAN STUDIES INSTITUTE African Studies Seminar Paper to be presented in RW 4.00pm MARCH 1984 Title: The Case Against the Mfecane. by: Julian Cobbing No. 144 UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND AFRICAN STUDIES INSTITUTE African studies Seminar Paper to be presented at Seminar in RW 319 at 4,00 pm on Monday, 5 March 1984 THE CASE AGAINST THE MFECANE by. QuJJjun Cobbing. By the 1970s the mfecane had become one of the most widely abused terms in southern African historical literature. Let the reader attempt a simple definition of the mfecane, for instance. This is not such an easy task. From one angle the mfecane was the Nguni diaspora which from the early 1820s took Nguni raiding communities such as the Ndebele, the Ngoni and the Gaza over a huge region of south-central Africa reaching as far north as Lake Tanzania. Africanists stress the positive features of the movement. As Ajayi observed in 1968: 'When we consider all the implications of the expansions of Bantu-speaking peoples there can he no doubt that the theory of stagnation has no basis whatsoever.' A closely related, though different, mfecane centres on Zululand and the figure of Shaka. It has become a revolutionary process internal to Nguni society which leads to the development of the ibutho and the tributary mode of production. Shaka is a heroic figure providing a positive historical example and some self-respect for black South Africans today. But inside these wider definitions another mfecane more specific- ally referring to the impact of Nguni raiders (the Nedbele, Hlubi and Ngwane) on the Sotho west of the Drakensberg.
    [Show full text]
  • 11010329.Pdf
    THE RISE, CONSOLIDATION AND DISINTEGRATION OF DLAMINI POWER IN SWAZILAND BETWEEN 1820 AND 1889. A study in the relationship of foreign affairs to internal political development. Philip Lewis Bonner. ProQuest Number: 11010329 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11010329 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT The Swazi kingdom grew out of the pressures associated with competition for trade and for the rich resources of Shiselweni. While centred on this area it acquired some of its characteristic features - notably a regimental system, and the dominance of a Dlamini aristocracy. Around 1815 the Swazi came under pressure from the South, and were forced to colonise the land lying north of the Lusutfu. Here they remained for some years a nation under arms, as they plundered local peoples, and were themselves swept about by the currents of the Mfecane. In time a more settled administration emerged, as the aristocracy spread out from the royal centres at Ezulwini, and this process accelerated under Mswati as he subdued recalcitrant chiefdoms, and restructured the regiments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Amabhele
    A Short History of AmaBhele As a clan, amaBhele have a long and vast history, which links them to other various Nguni language-speaking groups who are understood to have once lived in the central African region many centuries ago before they set on a long southward migration until they eventually settled along the east coast of what is now known as South Africa. This discussion serves as a short summary of this vast history. The main emphasis is on the period from the late 1700s and early-to-mid- 1800s when the clan was divided (or got separated) into numerous sections thereafter; and highlights how they were differently affected by the course of history from that period. As is customary with other Nguni clans, amaBhele got their clan name from one particular ‘Bhele’ who lived approximately four centuries ago. Not much information is known about ‘Bhele’ himself - except that the members of “Bhele’s” family later became known as amaBhele, and that they later grew and expanded to become a large clan. It is to the same ‘Bhele’ that abakwaNtshangase (distinct from Ntshangase/Mgazi), abakwaKhuboni and abakwaShabangu, respectively, also trace their descent. The circumstances around which these three above-mentioned sections separated from their parent clan, amaBhele, are not known. It is probably that there are other surnames that also historically derived from amaBhele (or ‘Bhele’). But for the purposes of this brief summary only these three are mentioned at this point because information concerning them is easy to verify and trace through a careful analysis of the information obtained from traditional African oral history pending a more in-depth inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Debate on the Mfecane That Erupted Following the Publication In
    A TEMPEST IN A TEAPOT? NINETEENTH-CENTURY CONTESTS FOR LAND IN SOUTH AFRICA‘S CALEDON VALLEY AND THE INVENTION OF THE MFECANE ABSTRACT: The unresolved debate on the mfecane in Southern African history has been marked by general acceptance of the proposition that large scale loss of life and disruption of settled society was experienced across the whole region. Attempts to quantify either the violence or mortality have been stymied by a lack of evidence. What apparently reliable evidence does exist describes small districts, most notably the Caledon Valley. In contrast to Julian Cobbing, who called the mfecane an alibi for colonial-sponsored violence, this article argues that much documentation of conflict in the Caledon region consisted of various ‗alibis‘ for African land seizures and claims in the 1840s and ‗50s. KEY WORDS: pre-colonial, mfecane, Lesotho, South Africa, nineteenth- century, warfare, land A hotly contested issue in the debate on South Africa‘s mfecane which enlivened the pages of this journal a decade ago was the charge that colonial historians invented the concept as part of a continuing campaign to absolve settler capitalism from responsibility for violent convulsions in South- 1 Eastern Africa in the first half of the nineteenth century.i This article takes a different tack by arguing that African struggles for land and power in the period 1833-54 played a decisive role in developing the mfecane concept. The self-serving narratives devised by African rivals and their missionary clients in and around the emerging kingdom of Lesotho set the pattern for future accounts and were responsible for introducing the word lifaqane into historical discourse long before the word mfecane first appeared in print.
    [Show full text]
  • Early History of South Africa
    THE EARLY HISTORY OF SOUTH AFRICA EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES . .3 SOUTH AFRICA: THE EARLY INHABITANTS . .5 THE KHOISAN . .6 The San (Bushmen) . .6 The Khoikhoi (Hottentots) . .8 BLACK SETTLEMENT . .9 THE NGUNI . .9 The Xhosa . .10 The Zulu . .11 The Ndebele . .12 The Swazi . .13 THE SOTHO . .13 The Western Sotho . .14 The Southern Sotho . .14 The Northern Sotho (Bapedi) . .14 THE VENDA . .15 THE MASHANGANA-TSONGA . .15 THE MFECANE/DIFAQANE (Total war) Dingiswayo . .16 Shaka . .16 Dingane . .18 Mzilikazi . .19 Soshangane . .20 Mmantatise . .21 Sikonyela . .21 Moshweshwe . .22 Consequences of the Mfecane/Difaqane . .23 Page 1 EUROPEAN INTERESTS The Portuguese . .24 The British . .24 The Dutch . .25 The French . .25 THE SLAVES . .22 THE TREKBOERS (MIGRATING FARMERS) . .27 EUROPEAN OCCUPATIONS OF THE CAPE British Occupation (1795 - 1803) . .29 Batavian rule 1803 - 1806 . .29 Second British Occupation: 1806 . .31 British Governors . .32 Slagtersnek Rebellion . .32 The British Settlers 1820 . .32 THE GREAT TREK Causes of the Great Trek . .34 Different Trek groups . .35 Trichardt and Van Rensburg . .35 Andries Hendrik Potgieter . .35 Gerrit Maritz . .36 Piet Retief . .36 Piet Uys . .36 Voortrekkers in Zululand and Natal . .37 Voortrekker settlement in the Transvaal . .38 Voortrekker settlement in the Orange Free State . .39 THE DISCOVERY OF DIAMONDS AND GOLD . .41 Page 2 EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES Humankind had its earliest origins in Africa The introduction of iron changed the African and the story of life in South Africa has continent irrevocably and was a large step proven to be a micro-study of life on the forwards in the development of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Molema and the Foundations of Tshidi History”
    CHAPTER ONE: “CHIEF MOLEMA AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF TSHIDI HISTORY” Relatively little information remains of the first Chief Molema’s life, yet the vital choices he made and the independent town he built made him vital to the history of the Molopo region. But for Chief Molema, this thesis argues, his grandson might not have interested himself in history at all. This chapter reconstructs aspects of his life that have been documented and to which Dr Molema would return, when attempting to re-create and explain his community’s history. This story begins some 83 years after the old Chief’s death. In 1964, near the end of Dr Seetsele Modiri Molema’s life, historian Dan Johns interviewed him in Mafikeng.1 Johns highlighted his recent political life in the African National Congress, skirting the doctor’s youth and his family’s eminence in the (then) small British Bechuanaland town, Mafikeng. Likewise, he skimmed over Molema’s education in the Eastern Cape, Scotland and Ireland. Dan Johns [DJ]: What was your early education? Dr Seetsele Modiri Molema [SMM]: I was born here in Mafeking and went to school here at the Mission School until Standard 4, then to the Mission School in Hazeltown (?) [Johns seems not to have known about Healdtown].2 Went to Lovedale for Matric, and then went overseas. My father was keen on education, he was the first teacher of the people here. We were the leaders in education, this was our family tradition. DJ: Did the family hold any particular position? SMM: Yes, my grandfather was the brother of a chief.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTINUITY and CHANGE in CISXEI CHIFZSHIP by J. B. Peires the Conventional Wisdom of South African Ethnologists, Whether Liberal
    CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN CISXEI CHIFZSHIP by J. B. Peires The conventional wisdom of South African ethnologists, whether liberal or conservative, has been dominated by the idea that African polities operated according to certain fixed rules (tlcustomsw)which were hallowed by tradition and therefore never chaaged. (1) A corolla-ry of this is that, if these rules could be correctly identified and fairly applied, everyone would be satisfied and chiefship could perhaps be saved. (2) It is, however, fairly well established that genealogies are often falsified, that new rules are coined and old rules bent to accommodate changing configurations of power, and that "age-old" customs may turn out to be fairly recent innovations; in short, that "organisational ideas do not directly control action, but only the interpretation of actionr1.(3) This conventional wisdom was successfully challenged by Comaroff in an important article, Itchiefship in a South African Homelandt1,which demonstrated that, by adhering too closely to the formal features of traditional government and politics among the Tswana, especially those concerning succession, the Government wrecked the political processes which had enabled the 'Pswam to choose the most suitable candidate as chief. (4) And yet Comarofffs article begs a good many questions. Let us imagine that the Government ethnologists read the article, and as a result allow Tswana chiefs to compete for office as before, permitting flconsultativedecision-making and participation in executive processes". (5) Would this prevent the Tswana chiefship from dying? Can we, in fact, discuss chiefship in political terms alone without considering whether the material conditions in which it flourished still exist? The present article will attempt to situate the question of chiefship in a somewhat wider framework than that usually provided by administrative theory or transactional analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Comparison of the Physical Features of the Zulu
    0 A STATISTICAL COr~ARISON OF THE PHYSiCAL FEATURES OF . ~ . THE ZULU-XHOSA AND SOUTH SOTHO-TSWANA PEOPLES OF' SOUTH AFRICA by Frederick Wilhelm Strydom Thesis submitted I'or the degree.of. .DoctorPhil.oso12hiae oi the University of Cape Town; October, 1951 • . I - - The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. ' , '•-.., __ ,. ...... - ... ,._ ...... ' ... , " ..... ~ .- '" ..... .... _ ............... ·- ........ ...... ..... f .. •' 0 The author wishes to express his sincere appre~iation to 'I lY The South African Cotmcil for Scientific and Industrial •. I Research for a sen~cr research grant which made this sur~ . vey possible.· .. 2) The Administrations of Basutoland and the Bechuanaland Pro- . t·ectorate. and t-he· Native CorEmi.ssioners of the· Uniori in the thi~ districts visited, for their. co-.operation whiie.. survey was being carried. ou·t •. 3) Dr. J .A. Keen and .Professor· M.R. Dr·ennan of the Unive·rsi ty · of Cape Town for their very h.elpful guiQ.ance in connection with this :study.· .• 4) Hi;s ·~wife who 3:ccornpanied him to the Nati,ve Reserves, tabu­ lated ~11 t~e data, did a l.arge part of the calculations, and prepared the album of photographs. ·• p . ' CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Page 4 Mf~ TERIL.L . AND lVIbTHODS. • • • • • . • • • • • •. •. • 5 Ethnic and Historical Background of each Tribe .
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald M. Segal Jan.-March 1959 Contents Dr
    VOL. 3 No. 2 EDITOR: RONALD M. SEGAL JAN.-MARCH 1959 CONTENTS DR. HENDRIK FRENSCH VERWOERD, PRIME MINISTER OF SOUTH AFRICA by Stanley Uys with illustration by David Marais - - - I REVOLUTIONS ARE NOT ABNORMAL by Michael Harmel - - - 12 REVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA by Dr. Edward Roux - - - 18 SATYAGRAHA IN SOUTH AFRICA by Fatima Meer - 2 i THE ABDICATION OF A COMMUNITY by Rabbi Dr. Andre Ungar - 29 THE TRIAL BEGINS by D. A. Leonard - - - 39 THE DUTCH REFORMED CHURCH MILITANT by W. P. Carstens - 48 A TAX ON POVERTY by Anne Welsh with illustration by David Marais - 54 RHODESIAN LIBERALS IN DILEMMA: THE ROAD TO UNION by Frank Barton - - 61 KEEP BRITAIN WHITE by H. A. Naidoo - - 6 BROWN TOWN BLUES by W.H. van derEyken with illustration by MickeyMunro. .. 69 TOWARDS AN AFRICAN LITERATURE (VII) by Dr. A. C. Jordan - - 74 ANGLICAN BISHOPS AND RACIAL CONFLICTS by The Right Rev. Richard Roseveare with illustration by Mickey Munro - - 8o BRITISH WEST AFRICA, PAST AND PRESENT by Dr. T. Olawale Elias - 8 NIGERIA'S CONSTITUTIONAL ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE by Dr. KaluEzera 93 FOREIGN AID AND SELF-HELP IN WEST AFRICA by L. A. Fabunmi - 100 THE ART OF AFRICA (III) (with illustrated inset) WEST AFRICAN BRONZES by Philip Dark o9 DING DONG BELL by Kwabena Annan - - I17 ExcuSe FOR DUST by John Howland Beaumont - - I25 BooKREVIEW byC.T.W. - - 126 AFRICA SOUTH is published quarterly by Africa South Publications (Ply.) Ltd. Editorial and Advertising Offices are at 2 Vlam Gebou, Parliament Street, Cape Town, South Africa. Price per issue 3s. 9d.; 15s.
    [Show full text]
  • Segregation and Apartheid in Twentieth-Century South Africa
    SEGREGATION AND APARTHEID IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SOUTH AFRICA ‘This is an outstanding collection…gathering the harvest of twenty years of intense scholarly and political debate. Jim Campbell, Northwestern University, Illinois ‘Well-known to South Africanists as individual contributions, this collection of seminal essays deserves, and will now find, a wider and more multidisciplinary audience.’ C.R.D.Halisi, Indiana University Beinart and Dubow’s selection of some of the most important essays on racial segregation and apartheid in twentieth-century South Africa provides an unparalleled introduction to this contentious and absorbing subject. The volume includes: • a specially written introduction by the editors which contextualizes the historiographical controversy, taking into account the 1994 election and associated changes; • explanatory notes and article summaries to improve the accessibility of the material; • a glossary of unusual terms to facilitate understanding. William Beinart is Reader in History at the University of Bristol. Saul Dubow is Lecturer in History at the School of African and Asian Studies, University of Sussex. Rewriting Histories Rewriting Histories focuses on historical themes where standard conclusions are facing a major challenge. Each book presents 8 to 10 papers (edited and annotated where necessary) at the forefront of current research and interpretation, offering students an accessible way to engage with contemporary debates. Series editor Jack R.Censer is Professor of History at George Mason University REWRITING
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report
    VOLUME THREE Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction to Regional Profiles ........ 1 Appendix: National Chronology......................... 12 Chapter 2 REGIONAL PROFILE: Eastern Cape ..................................................... 34 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Eastern Cape........................................................... 150 Chapter 3 REGIONAL PROFILE: Natal and KwaZulu ........................................ 155 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in Natal, KwaZulu and the Orange Free State... 324 Chapter 4 REGIONAL PROFILE: Orange Free State.......................................... 329 Chapter 5 REGIONAL PROFILE: Western Cape.................................................... 390 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Western Cape ......................................................... 523 Chapter 6 REGIONAL PROFILE: Transvaal .............................................................. 528 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Transvaal ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SOME CURRECJT MBNIXESTATIONS of Ellrly MFENGU HISTORY
    SOME CURRECJT MBNIXESTATIONS OF EllRLY MFENGU HISTORY R A Moyer In his recent paper on the Transkei, Morris Szeftel suggested that one of the major objectives of "separate developmentn and the "BantustanV policy is the transference of conflict from urban centres to the rural homelands. (1) This conflict would manifest itself in both inter- and intra-tribal hostilities rather than in the traditional black-white antagonisms. In the course of my recent field research in the Ciskei and the Transkei, I encountered numerous examples of how this policy is proving effective. When I began my research the only contemporary question I had intended to ask related to the teaching of Mfengu-Xhosa history in schools. However, many of the men who were recommended as potentially useful informants were active in politics, and they gave unsolicited testimony as to how the earljr history of the conflict between Xhosa and Mfengu is being resurrected to accomplish political ends. They also described how some white officials utilize public addresses to pour oil on the fires of "triballl resentment. My own topic is the history of the Mfengu from their inception as an identifiable people, approximately 1815, until 1860. As oral traditions were more easily found for this period in the Ciskei than in the Transkei, a greater percentage of time was spent there. Current ramifications of the traditional Xhosa-Mfengu hostility, coincidentally, are most pronounced in the Ciskei. Interviews were not limited to Mfengu informants but included as well representatives of both the Ciskei and Transkei Xhosa, the Thembu, Pondo, and Mpondomise. It will be recalled that in the South African context, particularly the Eastern Cape, the Mfengu people have historically been characterized as the great collaborators.
    [Show full text]