A Preliminary Comparison of the Two Recensions of "Jinpingmei" Author(s): Xiaofei Tian Source: Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies , Dec., 2002, Vol. 62, No. 2 (Dec., 2002), pp. 347-388 Published by: Harvard-Yenching Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/4126602 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies This content downloaded from 206.253.207.235 on Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:52:49 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms A Preliminary Comparison of the Two Recensions of Jinpingmei XIAOFEI TIAN Harvard University T HE sixteenth century novel Jinpingmei &#A* is known to have xiang textthree (the major illustrated recensions: text) Wi{* the or theJinpingmei so-called Chongzhen cihua .)iAl text M, the xiu- Zhang,2, and Zhupo the dzviJEtr1' qishu (1670-1698).' --W editions Textually with the thelast commentarytwo editions of are practically identical, but the cihua text and the xiuxiang text dif- fer drastically. Jinpingmei scholars hold different opinions about these two recensions. Scholars who interpret the differences between the two recensions as an aesthetically purposive revision often judge the xiuxiang text favorably, and argue that the revision must have been I am indebted to the suggestions provided by Patrick Hanan, Wai-yee Li, the anonymous reader, and, last but not the least, Stephen Owen.