DOCSLIB.ORG

Approved for Release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 Approved for Release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 UNCLASSIFIED

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Approved for Release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 Approved for Release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 UNCLASSIFIED Approved for release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 Approved for release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 UNCLASSIFIED This paper was principally authored by EASI Consult®, LLC with contributions from This paper was completed in January 2010 Contracting support provided by SPAWAR Atlantic Contract Number N6523606D6857-0448, N6523606D6857-0459 UNCLASSIFIED Approved for release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 UNCLASSIFIED CONTENTS_Toc288126829 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................1 Approach ....................................................................................................................................1 Key Findings ..............................................................................................................................1 The Psychosocial Considerations Cluster ....................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................3 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Policy Bases for the Psychosocial Consideration Guidelines .............................................4 Approach Used in the Literature Review ...................................................................................8 1. Prediction Perspective .................................................................................................... 8 2. Three Levels of Evidence and Other Evidence .............................................................. 8 3. Grouping the Four Guidelines ..................................................................................... 10 4. Scope of Security Behavior ......................................................................................... 11 5. Effect Sizes ................................................................................................................... 13 Setting the Stage: Incidents of Psychosocial Issues in SSBI Investigations ............................15 Level 1 Evidence........................................................................................................................... 16 Methodological Evaluation of the Three Major Studies ..........................................................16 Herbig (2008) .................................................................................................................... 16 Stone (1992) ...................................................................................................................... 17 Thompson (2003) .............................................................................................................. 17 Guideline D – Sexual Behavior (Disorder) ..............................................................................18 Guidelines G and H – Alcohol Consumption and Drug Involvement .....................................19 Guideline I – Psychological Conditions ..................................................................................20 Prevalence of Psychological Conditions in Spies ............................................................. 20 Psychological Conditions and Motivations to Spy ........................................................... 21 Level 2 Evidence........................................................................................................................... 22 Guideline D – Sexual Behavior ...............................................................................................25 Pornography Use and Harmful Behavior .......................................................................... 25 Guidelines G and H – Alcohol Consumption and Drug Involvement .....................................26 Substance Use and Workplace Injuries ............................................................................. 26 Substance Use and Counterproductive Workplace Behaviors.......................................... 26 Substance Use and Workplace Aggression....................................................................... 29 Guideline I – Psychological Conditions ..................................................................................30 “Occupational Functioning” ............................................................................................. 31 Partial Analogs to Security Violation Behavior................................................................ 31 PTSD (Appendix B) .......................................................................................................... 32 UNCLASSIFIED Approved for release by ODNI on 02-12-2016, FOIA Case #DF-2015-00303 UNCLASSIFIED Evidence of Psychological Conditions‟ Prediction of Analogs of Security Violation Behavior .......................................................................................................................32 Level 3 Evidence........................................................................................................................... 45 Personality Traits: An Overview .............................................................................................45 Personality Traits Associated with clinical psychological conditions .....................................48 Personality Traits as Predictors of Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) ......................50 Counterproductive Work Behavior ................................................................................... 50 Conscientiousness ............................................................................................................. 51 Integrity ............................................................................................................................. 52 Agreeableness ................................................................................................................... 53 Neuroticism (Emotional Stability) .................................................................................... 54 Extraversion ...................................................................................................................... 54 Locus of control ................................................................................................................ 56 Self-control ....................................................................................................................... 56 Moral Identity ................................................................................................................... 57 Affect ................................................................................................................................ 57 Summary of Evidence for Counterproductive Work Behavior ........................................ 60 Summary of Findings from Level 1, 2, and 3 Evidence ............................................................... 61 Mitigators of Psychosocial Evidence ............................................................................................ 64 Prevalence of Alcohol Consumption and Drug Involvement by White-Collar Employees ....64 Occupational Correlates of Substance Use ....................................................................... 68 Predictors of Alcohol Use Severity................................................................................... 69 Treatment of Alcohol Abuse/Dependence ........................................................................ 71 Treatment of Pathological Gambling ................................................................................ 72 Incidence of Workplace Internet Pornography Use .......................................................... 72 Summary of Findings about Mitigators of Psychosocial Guidelines ........................................... 78 References ..................................................................................................................................... 80 Appendix A: Antisocial Personality Disorder and Psychopathy ................................................ 105 Appendix B: Summary of Research on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder ................................... 109 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder .............................................................................................109 PTSD and Aggression, Hostility, Anger and Emotional Regulation .............................. 109 PTSD and “Hardiness” ................................................................................................... 110 PTSD and Social Support ............................................................................................... 113 PTSD and Occupational Functioning ............................................................................. 113 Appendix C: Evidence Relating to Positive Security Behavior.................................................. 115 Introduction ............................................................................................................................115 Organizational Citizenship Behavior .....................................................................................116 Personality Traits ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Psychology of Lying Farisha
    The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) | ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) Volume 2, Issue 2, Paper ID: B00345V2I22015 http://www.ijip.in | January to March 2015 Psychology of Lying Farisha. A. T. P1, Sakkeel. K. P2 ABSTRACT: Lying is a part of communication and a form of social behavior which is involved in interacting with others. Lying means saying a statement that he/she knows themselves as false to others to whom he/she want to perceive it as true. It can be explained by different psychological principles of psychodynamic theory, humanistic theory, behavior theory etc. Lying arises from hedonistic nature of humans that to avoid pain and to increase pleasure. It can be also seen that we lies not only for personal gains but also for others gain too. That is to avoid harm affecting ourselves and to avoid hurting others. Lying can be accepted if it saves someone’s life-ourselves or of others. Keywords: Psychological factors, Lie INTRODUCTION: Lying is a form of deceiving others verbally. It is a part of our behavioral response in communicating with others. It has long been a part of everyday life. We can't get through even a single day without telling lies. It is a consistent feature of human social behavior. We are not aware of all the lies we tell. We people lie most the time in our daily life, afraid of other people finding out the truth about us. We lie mostly to our parents, partners, friends, supervisors and so on to whomever else with whom we interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary and Secondary Subtypes of Juvenile Psychopathy: a Difference in Attentional Bias Toward Ψυιοπασδφγηϕκτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖaddictive Substances Jessica A
    πασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγ ηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζ ξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβν µθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτPrimary and secondary subtypes of juvenile psychopathy: a difference in attentional bias toward ψυιοπασδφγηϕκτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖaddictive substances Jessica A. Moreno Rojas βνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθω ερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυι οπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδ φγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλ ζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβ νµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωε ρτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιο πασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµρτψυιοπασδφγηϕ κλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχ ϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθ University of Amsterdam Clinical Forensic Psychology Masterthesis Supervisor UvA: Hans van der Baan Student number: 10002996 Submitted: April 10, 2016 γηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζ ξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβν 2 Primary and secondary subtypes of juvenile psychopathy: a difference in attentional bias toward addictive substances PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SUBTYPES OF JUVENILE PSYCHOPATHY: A DIFFERENCE IN ATTENTIONAL BIAS TOWARD ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCES Table of contents ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 JUVENILE PSYCHOPATHY .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Addicts As People
    Addicts as People William R. Miller, Ph.D. Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse and Addictions (CASAA) The University of New Mexico (USA) A Conflict of Interest The speaker is ambivalent about addiction treatment in the U.S. Origins of Stigma U.S. Prohibition 1920 • Alcohol Education During Prohibition • Alcohol is a medically and socially dangerous drug • Drinkers inflict great harm and cost on society • Alcohol cannot be used for long in moderation • Those who drink are headed for insanity or death • Abstinence is the only sane choice and then . End of Prohibition 1933 National Cognitive Dissonance 1935 The Seed of a Solution • It is only certain people who are at risk • Alcoholics are different from normal people • Non-alcoholics can drink with impunity Alcoholics/Addicts as “Other” An American Disease Model 1. Alcoholics have a disease that renders them constitutionally incapable of drinking in moderation 2. Their loss of control is permanent and irreversible 3. Therefore lifelong abstinence is essential for alcoholics 4. They have immature defense mechanisms and personality 5. Particularly a high level of “denial” and pathological lying 6. Therefore alcoholics are out of touch with reality “The quest for the test” Miller, W. R. (1986). Haunted by the Zeitgeist: Reflections on contrasting treatment goals and concepts of alcoholism in Europe and the United States. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 472, 110-129. This model justified “treatments” that would constitute malpractice for any other disorder “When the executive tried to deny that he had a drinking problem the medical director came down hard: ‘Shut up and listen.’ he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Enneagram-Type-2.Pdf
    M O V I N G F R O M F A L S E THE S E L F T O D E E P ENNEAGRAM CONNECTION the PEACEFUL person 9 the POWERFUL person 8 1 the GOOD person the JOYFUL person 7 2 the LOVING person the 6 3 the LOYAL person EFFECTIVE person 5 4 the the person WISE ORIGINAL person “…that according to the riches of his glory he may grant you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit in your inner being, so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith—that you, being rooted and grounded in love, may have strength to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.” (Eph. 3:16-19) In the early hours of April 15, 1912, on its maiden voyage from South Hampton to New York City, the Titanic sank when it collided “... THAT ACCORDING TO THE RICHES with an iceberg in the cold waters of the North Atlantic Ocean. OF HIS GLORY HE MAY GRANT Tragically, more than 1,500 people lost their lives. At the time, YOU TO BE STRENGTHENED WITH the Titanic was the largest, most well-built and luxurious ship ever POWER THROUGH HIS SPIRIT IN conceived. It was thought to be unsinkable. As one crew member YOUR INNER BEING ... TO KNOW THE reportedly said, “Not even God himself could sink this ship.” But LOVE OF CHRIST THAT SURPASSES what those aboard the Titanic didn’t know was that hidden beneath KNOWLEDGE ..
    [Show full text]
  • Physician's Newsletter
    PUBLISHED· BY THE N. Y. C. MEDICAL SOCIETY PHYSICIAN'S ON ALCOHOLISM, Inc. 167 East 80 St. New York 21, N.Y. A MARCH 1966 VOL. I, NO.2 ©Copyright 1966 The N.Y.C. Medical. NEWSLETTER Society on Alcoholism, Inc. I -HISTORIC RULING I 'TOTAL ABSTINENCE' TERMED A U.S. Court of Appeals tribunal in OBJECTIVE OF TREATMENT Richmond, Va., has rulee unanimously Alcoholic patients whose treatment led to total abstinence had the best chance that it is "cruel and unusual punish­ of marked improvement of social adaptation, according to Dr. D. L. Davies, director ment" to arrest and treat a chronic alco­ of psychiatry at Maudsley Hospital, London, England, a major teaching center. He holic as a criminal; he might, however, spoke at a seminar at Norwalk Hospital, Norwalk, Conn., about an. article .of. :I.Jis · be held for medical treatment. which had been widely thought to endorse treatment directed at·a return to so6Ial­ The case involved an individual who drinking. had been convicted of public intoxica­ Misunderstandings had arisen as a result of his report, "Normal Drinking tion more than 200 times and who esti­ in Reversed Alcoholics" published last mates that he has spent more than two­ year in the Quarterly Journal of Alcohol thirds of his life in jail. Studies. The article reports the elabo­ CENTRAL ISLIP OPENS Crux of the decision, which set aside rate follow-up studies of patients treated ALCOHOL FACILITY a 2-year sentence, was the court's state­ for alcoholism in Maudsley Hospital, in Dedication of the Charles K.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology 188 Impulse Control Disorders Dr. George F. Koob
    Psychology 188 impulse Control Disorders Dr. George F. Koob Winter 2010 Tuesdays and Thursdays 11:00 a.m. – 12:20 p.m. Price Center Auditorium 1 Syllabus Psychology 188 Winter 2010 Reader Date Lecture Topic Pages Tues Jan 5 Overview – Self Regulation 4 - 5 Thurs Jan 7 Mechanisms of Self-Regulation Failure 6 – 8 Tues Jan 12 Addiction Model of Self-Regulation Failure 9 – 13 Thurs Jan 14 Alcohol Abuse and Dependence 14 – 16 Tues Jan 19 Nicotine Dependence 17 – 19 Thurs Jan 21 Compulsive Gambling 20 – 22 Tues Jan 26 Compulsive Buying 26 – 28 Thurs Jan 28 Compulsive Sex 23 – 25 Tues Feb 2 MIDTERM Thurs Feb 4 Computer Addiction 29 – 34 Tues Feb 9 Failure to Control Emotions and Mood 35 – 37 Thurs Feb 11 Atypical Impulse Control Disorders 44 – 47 Tues Feb 16 Compulsive Eating and Bulimia – Dr. Amanda Roberts 38 – 40 Thurs Feb 18 Compulsive Exercise - Dr. Amanda Roberts 41 – 43 Tues Feb 23 Antisocial Personality Disorder and Psychopathy – Dr. Reid Meloy 48 – 49 Thurs Feb 25 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders – Dr. David Feifel 50 – 51 Tues Mar 2 Neuropsychiatric Disorders of Central Inhibition – Dr. Neal Swerdlow 52 – 53 Thurs Mar 4 Cultivating Self-Regulation & Treatment of Impulse Control Disorders 54 – 57 Tues Mar 9 Brain Mechanisms of Self-Regulation Failure and Stress 58 – 62 Thurs Mar 11 Bill Moyers Special: The Hijacked Brain Thurs Mar 18 FINAL EXAM 11:30 a.m. – 2:30 p.m Required Reading: There is a course reader available for download on the course website. Also, you will be required to read the first two chapters from the book “Losing Control”, which is available on the course website and the book is on reserve at the Geisel Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpersonal Traits of Psychopathy Linked to Reduced Integrity of the Uncinate Fasciculus
    r Human Brain Mapping 36:4202–4209 (2015) r Interpersonal Traits of Psychopathy Linked to Reduced Integrity of the Uncinate Fasciculus Richard C. Wolf,1,2 Maia S. Pujara,1,2 Julian C. Motzkin,1,2 Joseph P. Newman,3 Kent A. Kiehl,4,5 Jean Decety,6 David S. Kosson,7 and Michael Koenigs1* 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 2Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 3Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 4The Non-Profit MIND Research Network, An Affiliate of Lovelace Biomedical And Environmental Research Institute (LBERI), Albuquerque, New Mexico 5Departments of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Law, University Of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 6Department of Psychology, University Of Chicago, Illinois 7Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University Of Medicine And Science, North Chicago, Illinois r r Abstract: Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by callous lack of empathy, impulsive antisocial behavior, and criminal recidivism. Here, we performed the largest diffusion tensor imag- ing (DTI) study of incarcerated criminal offenders to date (N 5 147) to determine whether psychopa- thy severity is linked to the microstructural integrity of major white matter tracts in the brain. Consistent with the results of previous studies in smaller samples, we found that psychopathy was associated with reduced fractional anisotropy in the right uncinate fasciculus (UF; the major white matter tract connecting ventral frontal and anterior temporal cortices). We found no such associa- tion in the left UF or in adjacent frontal or temporal white matter tracts. Moreover, the right UF finding was specifically related to the interpersonal features of psychopathy (glib superficial charm, grandiose sense of self-worth, pathological lying, manipulativeness), rather than the affective, anti- social, or lifestyle features.
    [Show full text]
  • We Value Humility) Pastor Dave Lomas, Reality San Francisco
    Sermon Transcript from October 16th, 2016 God Is God and I’m Not (We Value Humility) Pastor Dave Lomas, Reality San Francisco We are in a series now on our vision statement. So, we're in a vision and values series that we started last week. Here's the vision of our church. If you are new to our church, if you've not been to Welcome to Reality or if you have been a part of this church but don't know it yet, here it is. Our vision statement, it's on our website and we communicate this all sorts of ways when we do events. It's like the grid that we see everything through as a church. Here it is. The first part of this has been our vision from the very beginning, since before the church was even started. This was the vision. Then, we added the second part of it just a couple years into the church. It's this: "We are a community following Jesus, seeking renewal in our city." A community following Jesus, seeking renewal in our city. I love that. I love the simplicity of it. I also think it's very profound as well. I hope that you would commit it to memory. A few years ago, we wanted to know what it would feel like in the culture of our church, in our lives, like felt experience or collective experience of what it would feel like to live into this vision. What would it be if that's the vision? We say that.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensive Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Alberta Gambling Research Institute Alberta Gambling Research Institute 1999 Intensive treatment program for problem gamblers Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission (AADAC) http://hdl.handle.net/1880/41354 technical report Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Intensive Treatment for Problem Gamblers Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission I MAINC HV 6722 C32 I57 1999 c.2 Intensive treatment program for problem gamblers. -- 3 5057 00630 0130 A Acknowledgements This Non-residential Intensive Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers has been the result of the work of many people over a period of two years.The initial survey of the Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission's supervisors indicated that a program such as this needed to be flexible so that it would fit with agency and client needs.The program provides a flexible guide for counsellors as opposed to a prescriptive format of delivery. During the two years in development, the program was field tested in various communities and various formats. Recommendations from those pilot experiences were implemented.We would like to thank Stan Wiens for the coordination, research and format of this program. AADAC staff who provided input on the modules include: Barry Andres, Dayle Bruce, Susan Cormack, Dave Delaire, Mary Ellen Jackson Herman, Diane Lamb, Gene LeBlanc, Ernie Ling, Harold Machmer, Marie-Line Mailloux, M.J. Mcleod, Ron Olsen and Karen Smith. Marley Chute was the tireless typist and computer formatter. Disclaimer AADAC is a non-profit agency of the government of Alberta.This resource is available free of charge to AADAC staff and may be distributed to other treatment personnel in Alberta in a limited number; however, a few packages may be sold on a partial cost-recovery basis to agencies outside the province but distribution and sale will be limited to Canada and the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • “Me”: the Nature of Conceit
    Living Word of the Buddha SDvol 19 no 2a “Me”: The nature of conceit “Me” The Nature of Conceit [The psychological complexes and narcissism] by Piya Tan ©2007 “What is in our mind appears more real than what is outside of it.” [7.5] 1 Complexes 1.1 STATUS AND CONCEIT. The Alagaddûpama Sutta (M 22) teaches that the five aggregates, each and every one of them, should be regarded as ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.’1 These statements are the opposite of the threefold graspings (ti,vidha gāha), namely, “Thisismine” (etam mama) (arises through craving, tahā,gāha) = “mine-making”; “This I am” (eso’ham asmi) (arises through conceit, māna,gāha) = “conceit”;and “Thisismyself” (eso me attā) (arises through wrong view, dihi,gāha) = “I-making.” (Anattā,lakkhaa Sutta, S 3:68 = SD 1.2) These three wrong attitudes are also known as the “latent tendencies to ‘I’-making, ‘mine’-making and conceit” (aha.kāra,mama.kāra,mānnusaya).2 These threefold graspings are the main factors behind conception (maññana) (M 1) and mental proliferation (papañca) (M 18). In short, such experiences are not merely “beliefs” but are direct reactions to reality.3 In this essay, we shall discuss the second of the threefold graspings—that of “This I am” (eso’ham asmi)—which arises because of grasping through conceit (māna,gāha). When we hold the view, “This I am,” we are clinging to the notion of duality, that is, there is an “I” and “other” beyond the mere conven- tional usage of the words.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Psychopathy and Substance Addiction Are Highly Co
    1 Introduction Psychopathy and substance addiction are highly co-morbid. This co-morbidity has often been examined in a cause and effect relationship, where one condition pre-dates the other and results in the onset of the second condition. Rather than view the co-morbidity between addiction and psychopathy as a cause and effect relationship, I will argue that the two disorders are actually linked by a series of underlying traits. These traits do not serve as simply common characteristics among addicts and psychopaths, but rather as an explanation for the emergence of both addictive and psychopathic behaviors in certain individuals. In examining the presence of impulsivity and novelty seeking in both addicts and psychopaths, these characteristics emerge as hallmark traits in both populations. Recent evidence suggests that both these traits may result from the presence of a specific polymorphism on the dopamine D4 receptor gene. This 7-repeat sequence on the dopamine D4 receptor gene may ultimately account for a pre-disposed, genetic vulnerability for the emergence of psychopathy and addictions as the result of increased impulsivity and novelty seeking coupled with negative environmental factors. History of Psychopathy Throughout history, societal norms define normal behavior. Defining and understanding normalcy has not been nearly as difficult as understanding the abnormal. The extremes of society present a struggle for explaining human behavior. While both the exceptionally good and terribly evil fall outside the realm of most human experiences, societies have always been fascinated with attempting to understand the extremes of behavior perceived as evil. 2 Psychopathy as a modern construct for understanding the behaviors and expressions which characterize the most evil extremes of society has largely been defined by the work of Robert Hare, who not only developed the defining list of psychopathic traits, but also created the Psychopathy Checklist, Revised for psychopathic evaluation (Hare online).
    [Show full text]
  • Mediator Complex Or Empathy Sickness and Judge Complex
    Case Report ERA’S JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH VOL.8 NO.1 DOI:10.24041/ejmr2021.18 MEDIATOR COMPLEX OR EMPATHY SICKNESS AND JUDGE COMPLEX Ismael Tabuñar Fortunado Department of Industrial and Engineering Research National Research Council of the Philippines, University of Santo Tomas Philippines Received on : 31-05-2021 Accepted on : 05-06-2021 ABSTRACT Address for correspondence We put ourselves in others shoes. How often? Does it bring pain? Does it Dr. Ismael T. Fortunado affect our mood? Mediator is defined as a person who attempts to make Department of Industrial and people involved in a conflict come to an agreement; a go-between while Engineering Research complex is an abnormality, most often a serious one. Judge on the other University of Santo Tomas Philippines hand, decides cases. This is an introduction to a proposed complex wherein Email: [email protected] the author is admitted to have some symptoms of which may be considered. Contact no: +63-9952862597 That we often derive sorrow from the sorrow of others, is a matter of fact too obvious to require any instances to prove it. – Adam Smith KEYWORDS: Complex, Empathy Sickness, Judge complex, Mediator complex, Sickness. INTRODUCTION means, and professionals are often unwilling to use A god complex is an unshakable belief characterized the label because it is considered vague and by the consistently inflated feelings of personal ability, derogatory. (McIntosh 1989 and Alder 1992) Being privilege, or infallibility. A person with a god complex spoiled is not recognized as a mental disorder in any may refuse to admit the possibility of their error or of the medical manuals, such as the ICD-10 (Many failure, even in the face of irrefutable evidence, Authors 2021a) or the DSM-IV (Many Authors intractable problems or difficult or impossible tasks.
    [Show full text]