Nomenclatures in the Territorial Code System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nomenclatures in the Territorial Code System Nomenclatures in the territorial code system Nomenclature of the country code Budapest 01 Baranya county 02 Bács-Kiskun county 03 Békés county 04 Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén county 05 Csongrád county 06 Fejér county 07 Győr-Moson-Sopron county 08 Hajdú-Bihar county 09 Heves county 10 Komárom-Esztergom county 11 Nógrád county 12 Pest county 13 Somogy county 14 Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county 15 Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok county 16 Tolna county 17 Vas county 18 Veszprém county 19 Zala county 20 Activity outside the borders of the country 21 Data cannot be assigned to a county 22 Nomenclature of capital's district code Budapest district I. 01 Budapest district II. 02 Budapest district III. 03 Budapest district IV. 04 Budapest district V. 05 Budapest district VI. 06 Budapest district VII. 07 Budapest district VIII. 08 Budapest district IX. 09 Budapest district X. 10 Budapest district XI. 11 Budapest district XII. 12 Budapest district XIII. 13 Budapest district XIV. 14 Budapest district XV. 15 Budapest district XVI. 16 Budapest district XVII. 17 Budapest district XVIII. 18 Budapest district XIX. 19 Budapest district XX. 20 Budapest district XXI. 21 Budapest district XXII. 22 Budapest district XXIII. 23 The code of every settlements (Budapest as well) 00 No settlement (Fictional territorial unit) 99 1 Nomenclature of the settlement's legal status code Capital 1 Town of county rank 2 Town 3 Village 4 No settlement (Fictional territorial unit) 9 Nomenclature of the county seat code County seat 1 Not county seat 2 No settlement (Fictitious territorial unit) 9 Nomenclature of the settlement's legal status ’2005 code Capital 10 Town of county rank 20 Town 30 Large village 41 Village 42 No settlement (Fictional territorial unit) 90 The nomenclature of the statistical large region code Közép-Magyarország (Budapest, Pest) 1 Dunántúl (Közép-Dunántúl, Nyugat-Dunántúl, Dél-Dunántúl) 2 Alföld és Észak (Észak-Magyarország, Észak-Alföld, Dél-Alföld) 3 The nomenclature of the region code The statistical regions and their corresponding county (capital) Budapest, (Budapest) 11 Pest (Pest) 12 Közép-Dunántúl (Fejér, Komárom-Esztergom, Veszprém) 20 Nyugat-Dunántúl (Győr-Moson-Sopron, Vas, Zala) 30 Dél-Dunántúl (Baranya, Somogy, Tolna) 40 Észak-Magyarország (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén, Heves, Nógrád) 50 Észak-Alföld (Hajdú-Bihar, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg) 60 Dél-Alföld (Bács-Kiskun, Békés, Csongrád) 70 Data cannot be assigned to a county 80 Activity outside the borders of the country 90 Nomenclature of the NUTS code 1st–2nd position: country code – HU 3rd position: 1. level – statistical large region 4th position: 2. level – regions – within a statistical large region 5th position: 3. level – counties, capital – within a region Hungary (Magyarország) HU Közép-Magyarország HU1 Budapest HU11 Budapest HU110 Pest HU12 Pest HU120 Dunántúl HU2 2 Közép-Dunántúl HU21 Fejér HU211 Komárom-Esztergom HU212 Veszprém HU213 Nyugat-Dunántúl HU22 Győr-Moson-Sopron HU221 Vas HU222 Zala HU223 Dél-Dunántúl HU23 Baranya HU231 Somogy HU232 Tolna HU233 Alföld és Észak HU3 Észak-Magyarország HU31 Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén HU311 Heves HU312 Nógrád HU313 Észak-Alföld HU32 Hajdú-Bihar HU321 Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok HU322 Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg HU323 Dél-Alföld HU33 Bács-Kiskun HU331 Békés HU332 Csongrád HU333 Cannot be classified (Extra-Region) HUZZZ Nomenclature of the district code The code of the districts Budapest district I. 001 Budapest district II. 002 Budapest district III. 003 Budapest district IV. 004 Budapest district V. 005 Budapest district VI. 006 Budapest district VII. 007 Budapest district VIII. 008 Budapest district IX. 009 Budapest district X. 010 Budapest district XI. 011 Budapest district XII. 012 Budapest district XIII. 013 Budapest district XIV. 014 Budapest district XV. 015 Budapest district XVI. 016 Budapest district XVII. 017 Budapest district XVIII. 018 Budapest district XIX. 019 Budapest district XX. 020 Budapest district XXI. 021 Budapest district XXII. 022 Budapest district XXIII. 023 Bóly district 024 Hegyhát district 025 Komló district 026 Mohács district 027 3 Pécs district 028 Pécsvárad district 029 Sellye district 030 Siklós district 031 Szentlőrinc district 032 Szigetvár district 033 Bácsalmás district 034 Baja district 035 Jánoshalma district 036 Kalocsa district 037 Kecskemét district 038 Kiskőrös district 039 Kiskunfélegyháza district 040 Kiskunhalas district 041 Kiskunmajsa district 042 Kunszentmiklós district 043 Tiszakécske district 044 Békés district 045 Békéscsaba district 046 Gyomaendrőd district 047 Gyula district 048 Mezőkovácsháza district 049 Orosháza district 050 Sarkad district 051 Szarvas district 052 Szeghalom district 053 Cigánd district 054 Edelény district 055 Encs district 056 Gönc district 057 Kazincbarcika district 058 Mezőcsát district 059 Mezőkövesd district 060 Miskolc district 061 Ózd district 062 Putnok district 063 Sárospatak district 064 Sátoraljaújhely district 065 Szerencs district 066 Szikszó district 067 Tiszaújváros district 068 Tokaj district 069 Csongrád district 070 Hódmezővásárhely district 071 Kistelek district 072 Makó district 073 Mórahalom district 074 Szeged district 075 Szentes district 076 Bicske district 077 Dunaújváros district 078 Enying district 079 Gárdony district 080 Martonvásár district 081 Mór district 082 4 Sárbogárd district 084 Székesfehérvár district 085 Csorna district 086 Győr district 087 Kapuvár district 088 Mosonmagyaróvár district 089 Pannonhalma district 090 Sopron district 091 Tét district 092 Balmazújváros district 093 Berettyóújfalu district 094 Debrecen district 095 Derecske district 096 Hajdúböszörmény district 097 Hajdúhadháza district 098 Hajdúnánás district 099 Hajdúszoboszló district 100 Nyíradony district 101 Püspökladány district 102 Bélapátfalva district 103 Eger district 104 Füzesabony district 105 Gyöngyös district 106 Hatvan district 107 Heves district 108 Pétervására district 109 Esztergom district 110 Kisbér district 111 Komárom district 112 Oroszlány district 113 Tata district 114 Tatabánya district 115 Balassagyarmat district 116 Bátonyterenye district 117 Pásztó district 118 Rétság district 119 Salgótarján district 120 Szécsény district 121 Aszód district 122 Budakeszi district 123 Cegléd district 124 Dabas district 125 Dunakeszi district 126 Érd district 127 Gödöllő district 128 Gyál district 129 Monor district 130 Nagykáta district 131 Nagykőrös district 132 Pilisvörösvár district 133 Ráckeve district 134 Szentendre district 135 Szigetszentmiklós district 136 Szob district 137 5 Vác district 138 Vecsés district 139 Barcs district 140 Csurgó district 141 Fonyód district 142 Kaposvár district 143 Marcali district 144 Nagyatád district 145 Siófok district 146 Tab district 147 Baktalórántháza district 148 Csenger district 149 Fehérgyarmat district 150 Ibrány district 151 Kemecse district 152 Kisvárda district 153 Mátészalka district 154 Nagykálló district 155 Nyírbátor district 156 Nyíregyháza district 157 Tiszavasvári district 158 Vásárosnamény district 159 Záhony district 160 Jászapáti district 161 Jászberény district 162 Karcag district 163 Kunhegyes district 164 Kunszentmárton district 165 Mezőtúr district 166 Szolnok district 167 Tiszafüred district 168 Törökszentmiklós district 169 Bonyhád district 170 Dombóvár district 171 Paks district 172 Szekszárd district 173 Tamási district 174 Tolna district 175 Celldömölk district 176 Körmend district 177 Kőszeg district 178 Sárvár district 179 Szentgotthárd district 180 Szombathely district 181 Vasvár district 182 Ajka district 183 Balatonalmádi district 184 Balatonfüred district 185 Devecser district 186 Pápa district 187 Sümeg district 188 Tapolca district 189 Várpalota district 190 Veszprém district 191 6 Zirc district 192 Keszthely district 193 Lenti district 194 Letenye district 195 Nagykanizsa district 196 Zalaegerszeg district 197 Zalaszentgrót district 198 Budapest, and fictional territorial unit 999 The code of the seats of the districts Not a seat of a district 0 Seat of a district 1 Budapest, and fictional territorial unit 9 The nomenclature of the agglomeration code 1st position Budapest agglomeration 0 Rural agglomeration 1 Agglomerating area 2 Urban settlements groups 3 Settlement not belonging to a settlement group 9 1st–3rd. position The two position identifying the specific agglomeration (agglomeration area, etc.) Budapest 000 Budapest agglomeration Northern sector 001 Eastern sector 002 South-eastern sector 003 Southern sector 004 Western sector 005 North-western sector 006 Győr agglomeration 101 Miskolc agglomeration 102 Pécs agglomeration 103 Balaton agglomerating area 201 Eger agglomerating area 202 Szombathely agglomerating area 203 Zalaegerszeg agglomerating area 204 Békéscsaba urban settlements group 301 Debrecen urban settlements group 302 Kaposvár urban settlements group 303 Kecskemét urban settlements group 304 Nyíregyháza urban settlements group 305 Salgótarján urban settlements group 306 Sopron urban settlements group 307 Szeged urban settlements group 308 Szekszárd urban settlements group 309 Székesfehérvár urban settlements group 310 Szolnok urban settlements group 311 Tatabánya urban settlements group 312 Veszprém urban settlements group 313 7 Dunaújváros urban settlements group 314 Nagykanizsa urban settlements group 315 Settlement not belonging to a settlement group 999 4th position Center 1 Co-center 2 Other settlement 3 Settlement not belonging to a settlement group 9 The nomenclature of the grape-bearing area code Pannon grape-bearing area 1 Balaton grape-bearing area 2 Duna grape-bearing
Recommended publications
  • FLORSB Reserved for Dividend Declared and Unpaid on Common Stock- Depression in The' Sudeten Areas
    HUNGARY ORDERS REICH PROSPERITY CALLS FOR SPEED VETS RECRUITED FROM PACT SEEN ________________ Chamberlain Is Declared to Arnold Says U. S. Has Government is Preparing Confidence Now Restored Have on Future Trade Eye Enough Planes, but Needs to Press Its Claims in to European Nations, Agreements. Faster Ones. Czechoslovakia. Theorists Argue. SIB ARTHUR WILLERT. Hr the Associated By Press. By the Associated Preu. B, the Associated B» Radio to The Star. Pres*. Gen. H. Arnold, new BUDAPEST, Oct. 4.—Numerous war LONDON. Oct. 4 (N.A.N.A.).—The Maj. Henry BERLIN. Oct. 4.—Hopes are high statement that Great Britain will chief of the Army Air Corps, said to- veterans more than 45 years old had among Berlin political and economic theorists that the world look never again disarm unilaterally, that in day this country doesn’t need a great orders to report to the nearest army may forward to an fact she will continue to build her upsurge of prosperity, up many more station as the military airplanes, but recruiting today Hun- now' that the war has fighting power until other countries scare dwindled. needs faster ones. garian government pressed 4ta claims They argue that the Munich four- are prepared to talk disarmament, is to territories of accord regarded among diplomats here as the When the present Air Corps develop- Hungarian minority power on peace restored con- Czechoslovakia. fidence key passage of Prime Minister Cham- ment program is completed in 1940, among European nations. berlain's before the The of certain raw ma- will speech yesterday the Army will have 2,320 craft.
    [Show full text]
  • RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final Version
    GeoCom – FP7 CONCERTO – 239515 RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final version WP Leader: P9 – University of Szeged. Key Contributors: P1, P2, P8 2012 GEOCOM WP5 - Technological Research / WP5.1 Integration with other RES The main scope of this sub-WP has been to outline ways of integrating geothermal energy in energy systems in Central-Eastern Europe. In this WP available experience of integrating geothermal energy into a cascaded facility with a view to environmental improvements and extending the utilization time and spectrum of uses of such facilities has been be studied. Researchers at the University of Szeged looked at the economic and environmental factors of geothermal systems operating in the South Great Plain Region, outlined potential project sites and developed a number of project plans presented here in brief. We collected data from GeoCom project partners too regarding utilization in other CEE countries. This volume presents the first concise study of actual and potential geothermal projects in the South Great Plain of Hungary, with project concepts developed entirely by our researchers and contracted experts. Our work is complemented by data provided by our partners from Serbia, Slovakia, FYROM and Poland. As projects in renewable energy use differ greatly from one-another we did not intend to formulate general conclusions regarding economic or environmental factors of RES integration. Rather, we present the RE potential of the target region, showcase our development proposals, and provide a tool (GIS model) to assist future project development. As stated in Annex 1 the main scope of this sub-WP has been to outline ways of integrating geothermal sources in energy systems, including those with other RES.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Exploitation of Limnosilicites in Northern Hungary: Problems and Perspectives Zsolt Mester and Norbert Faragó
    Archaeologia Polona, vol. 54: 2016, 1 – 5 PL ISSN 0066 - 5924 Editorial The first scientific investigations of the sources of flint in Poland were undertaken by archaeologist Stefan Krukowski and geologist Jan Samsonowicz in the early 20th century. Krukowski used archaeological materials to identify the macroscopic char- acteristics of ‘chocolate’ flints, described their differences, and showed the potential location of the deposits (Krukowski 1920: 189–195; Budziszewski 2008: 33). In the search for deposits of flint, their outcrops, and prehistoric mines, Krukowski was accompanied by young geologist Jan Samsonowicz. The result of their cooperation was the discovery in 1921 of in situ deposits and surface accumulations of limestones containing fragments of flint and, in 1922, the identification of a prehistoric mine at Krzemionki Opatowskie (Krukowski 1923; Samsonowicz 1923; Bąbel 2014). This long tradition of studying siliceous rocks has continued at the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Science. In 1965 Zygmunt Krzak published the first characterization of gray white-spotted (świeciechów) flint (Krzak 1965) and five years later he described Turonian flint from Ożarów (Krzak 1970). In 1971 Romuald Schild devised a classification of ‘chocolate’ flint from the north-east margin of the Holy Cross (Świątokrzyskie) Mountains (Schild 1971, 1976) and Bogdan Balcer investigated a flint mine in Świeciechów, Kraśnik district, and the use of gray white-spotted (świeciechów) flint during the Neolithic (Balcer 1975, 1976). In 1980 Jacek Lech discussed the geology of Jurassic-Cracow flint and showed its relevance to archaeology (Lech 1980). Since that time Polish archeologists have carried out many investigations on different types of flint (e.g., Budziszewski and Michniak 1983/1989; Pawlikowski 1989; Budziszewski and Michinak eds 1995; Schild and Sulgostowska eds 1997; Matraszek and Sałaciński eds 2002; Gutowski 2004; Borkowski et al., 2008; Migaszewski et al., 2006, Krajcarz et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary As a Country of Asylum, March 2016 2 A
    Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Ukraine Austria Hungary Slovenia Croatia Romania Bosnia and Serbia Herzegovina Montenegro Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) HungaryThe former Yugoslav Republic As a Country of Asylumof Macedonia Italy Albania Greece Observations on restrictive legal measures and subsequent practice implemented between July 2015 and March 2016 May 2016 Contents Contents A. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................3 B. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................4 C. Background .................................................................................................................................................................................5 D. Border procedure in the transit zones at Hungary’s borders with Serbia and Croatia ..................................8 a) Legal basis of the border procedure in the transit zones .............................................................................................8 b) Implementation of the border procedure in practice ................................................................................................. 10 E. Safe third country concept ................................................................................................................................................. 13 a) Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • LEARNING in ADULTHOOD Cases of Lifelong Learning
    Edina Márkus PhD – Barbara Máté-Szabó Márta Takács-Miklósi PhD (eds.) LEARNING IN ADULTHOOD Cases of lifelong learning Debrecen, 2019 Publishing data Responsible publisher: Nullpont Cultural Association Project name: Learning communities and social transformation Project number: EFOP-5.2.2-17-2017-00066 Technical editor, typography: Balázs Pete Press work: Kapitális Press Book Format: A5 size Scope of the book: 132 Font: Arial Lectors: Tamás Kozma DSc Balázs Benkei-Kovács PhD Learning in Adulthood Edited: Edina Márkus PhD – Barbara Máté-Szabó Márta Takács-Miklósi PhD ISBN number: 978-615-00-5230-4 Contents Foreword ..................................................................................... 9 I. Settlement-based analyses and good practices ........................... 13 Anita Hegedűs:The role of cultural and community learning in the development of the Makó township: Cultural and community learning in Földeák ............................................................................................ 15 Dávid Rábai: Community learning and social innovation – the case of Hajdúhadház .................................................................................... 27 Barbara Máté-Szabó: The role of sports in community building and developing learning in the Hajdúnánás township ......................... 37 Dorina Anna Tóth: CHEC as an opportunity for breaking out – the case of Sátoraljaújhely ................................................................... 47 II. Organisation-based initiatives, domestic and international good
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Series Recueil Des Traite's
    Treaty Series Treaties and internationalagreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 577 Recueil des Traite's Traitis et accords internationaux enregistres ou classes et inscrits au r'pertoire au Secritariat de l'Organisation des Nations Unies United Nations* Nations Unies New York, 1968 Treaties and internationalagreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 577 1966 I. Nos. 8370-8381 TABLE OF CONTENTS Treaties and internationalagreements registeredfrom 9 November 1966 to 10 November 1966 Page No. 8370. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Agreement establishing regulations for the transport of goods by lorry or similar motor vehicle and the customs procedure in connexion there- with (with Protocol). Signed at Budapest, on 9 February 1962 .. ..... 3 No. 8371. Hungary and Yemen: Treaty of Friendship and Co-operation. Signed at Budapest, on 30 May 1964 . .. 39 No. 8372. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Convention concerning scientific, educational and cultural co-operation. Signed at Belgrade, on 15 October 1963 ... ............. .. 49 No. 8373. Hungary and Bulgaria: Agreement concerning scientific and cultural co-operation. Signed at Buda- pest, on 19 August 1965 ....... .................... ... 67 No. 8374. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Agreement concerning the abolition of the visa requirement. Signed at Budapest, on 23 November 1965 ..... ................ 89 No. 8375. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Agreement concerning the regulation of minor frontier traffic (with annexes). Signed at Budapest, on 9 August 1965 .... .............. ... 103 No. 8376. Hungary and Poland: Agreement concerning international motor transport. Signed at Budapest, on 18 July 1965 .... ... ... ......................... 161 Traitis et accords internationauxenregistris ou classis et inscrits au ripertoire au Secritariat de l'Organisationdes Nations Unies VOLUME 577 1966 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Baldwin Lauds Acts Resulting in Accord As Attacks Renewe
    Six Bunted Fatally Here WITNESS AVERS REPUBUCANS GAIN FASCISTS 4^1 BALDWIN LAUDS ACTS A SWEEPING 2 TO 1 SECRETA ELECDON VICTORY RESULTING IN ACCORD Italian Consular Officials I FOX HCNTEB SAGS Democratic Gpposition Is OEEK WITH CANE. Spread Propaganda Fori Waterboro, 8. C., OcL 4.— AS ATTACKS RENEWE Slippiiig As GOP Jmnps Mussolini In United States (A P )—Rob ^ Mlddlebrooks of r n Asbebdro u ^ t fox hunting and POLICE FIND HORSE bagged a deer with a walking Last Year’s Winoiiig Lead Dies Committee Told. ASTRIDE AlTO HOOD | cane. FRIENDLY ERA Chamberiam’s The buck, frightened by the Philadelphia, O ct 4.— (A P ) — By More Thaa 500 Votes. fox bounds, darted from the Police speeding to s traflic acci­ woods, ran into a fence, and was Washington. Oct. 4__ (A P ) — I dent found a horse astride the Declares Premier IS ANNOUNCED hurled back, dazed. AU Mid- Girolamo-Valenti, chairm an'^ the hood o f Mra. Maude Bullock's lebrooks bad to do was swing I^llan Anti-Fascist Committee, de­ ftQtoinobUo. Behind' Dobbin w$s Hare Doae Nodung In a towti election yesterday lustily with a hickory cane. a^bakery wagon with which he clared today that ‘Ttallon consular Nhlch was all disappointing to local BYDALADIER had bolted six blocks. He ap­ officials and secret Fascist agents 'Denlocratle hopes as it waa m o l ­ parently tried to jump over the Than Go To Berchti ore spreading Fascist propaganda car, but the wagon anchored him ing to Jubilant Republlcucf^Man' throughout the ranks of apnla' 200 down.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 26/10/2011
    SECOND SECTION CASE OF SHAW v. HUNGARY (Application no. 6457/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 July 2011 FINAL 26/10/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. SHAW v. HUNGARY JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Shaw v. Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Françoise Tulkens, President, Danut÷ Jočien÷, David Thór Björgvinsson, Dragoljub Popović, András Sajó, Işıl Karakaş, Guido Raimondi, judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 5 July 2011, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 6457/09) against the Republic of Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Irish national, Mr Leslie James Shaw (“the applicant”), on 28 January 2009. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr L. Hincker, a lawyer practising in Strasbourg. The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. 3. The applicant alleged that the Hungarian authorities failed to act swiftly in the abduction proceedings at issue and did not make adequate and effective efforts to enforce his right to the return of his child, illegally removed from France, therefore breaching his rights under Article 8 of the Convention. 4. On 5 July 2010 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Győrffy Erzsébet KORAI ÓMAGYAR KORI FOLYÓVÍZNEVEK
    Gy ırffy Erzsébet KORAI ÓMAGYAR KORI FOLYÓVÍZNEVEK Gy ırffy Erzsébet Korai ómagyar kori folyóvíznevek Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó Debrecen University Press 2011 A Magyar Névarchívum Kiadványai 20. Szerkeszt ı: Hoffmann István A publikáció elkészítését a TÁMOP 4.2.1./B-09/1/KONV-2010-0007 számú projekt támogatta. A projekt az Új Magyarország Fejlesztési Terven keresztül az Európai Unió támogatásával, az Európai Regionális Fejlesztési Alap és az Európai Szociális Alap társfinanszírozásával valósult meg. A megjelenést támogatta továbbá az MTA DAB és „A tudományért a régióban” Alapítvány, valamint az Országos Tudományos Kutatási Alap (62207 sz.). Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Magyar Nyelvtudományi Tanszékén. Lektorálta: Maticsák Sándor © Gy ırffy Erzsébet, 2011 © Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó, beleértve az egyetemi hálózaton belüli elektronikus terjesztés jogát, 2011 ISBN 978-963-318-122-5 Kiadja a Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó, az 1975-ben alapított Magyar Könyvkiadók és Könyvterjeszt ık Egyesülésének a tagja. Felel ıs kiadó: Dr. Virágos Márta f ıigazgató Borítóterv: Varga József Készült a Debreceni Egyetem sokszorosító üzemében. Tartalom Bevezetés .................................................................................................... 7 I. A magyar víznévkutatás története ............................................................. 11 1. Adattárak ........................................................................................... 11 2. Etimológiai és névrendszertani kutatások ............................................. 13 3. A folyóvíznevek
    [Show full text]
  • It's the Survivors Who Rebuild! … the Story of József Osztróvszky by Vic Berecz
    It's the Survivors Who Rebuild! … the Story of József Osztróvszky by Vic Berecz. Our Yankee neighbors to the north proudly proclaim, Live Free or Die . Martyrdom is a great symbolic act. But, I’d like to recount the story of a survivor. With it, I hope to convince you that progress is driven by the living -- that it’s the survivors who are presented with the opportunity to rebuild a nation. That survivor is József Osztróvszky, my great-great-grandfather. My mother in New York, because her father had died when she was still young and the family had no contact with relatives in Hungary, knew very little about her ancestors. She knew only that her Heszlényi grandfather was born in Szeged, and that his wife was named Mária Osztróvszky. She also knew that her father had been orphaned at age five, and was brought up by his grandfather and his aunt Vilma. She knew nothing else about the family. It was not until recent years, when I began investigating my roots in Hungary -- and when I had some luck on the Internet -- that I became aware of all that was happening in 1849, when my great-grandmother Mária was József Osztróvszky in 1861 … born. from painting in Szeged City Hall. József Osztróvszky was born in 1818 in Szeged. He was the son of a prosperous butcher. of Hungarian progress that he dedicated his later Like all the wealthier Roman Catholic boys of life to broad civic interests. In the 1830’s and Szeged, József attended the Piarist Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the President of the National Office for the Judiciary 2017
    Annual report of the President of the National Office for the Judiciary 2017 SYNOPTIC TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I – EFFICIENCY OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE .................................................................. 13 PART II – HUMAN CAPACITIES OF THE JUDICIAL ORGANISATION ...................................................... 61 PART III – ASSETS ............................................................................................................................................................. 77 PART IV – INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIAL ORGANIZATION ........................................................................ 103 PART V – ACCESS TO JUSTICE .................................................................................................................................. 129 PART VI – THE TRAINING ........................................................................................................................................... 151 PART VII – OPERATION OF THE NATIONAL OFFICE FOR THE JUDICIARY ...................................... 179 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................................ 189 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I – EFFICIENCY OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE .................................................................. 13 1. Caseload .............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Statistics
    GÁBOR PIRISI – ANDRÁS TRÓCSÁNYI Spatial aspects of the ambulance service in Hungary Introduction The investigation of the structural components of human life quality (both spatial and temporal) has yielded substantial results in recent times (Bácsy & Vizi 1998, Fekete 2006, Hankiss & Manchin & Füstös 1978, Kopp & Kovács 2006). The relevance of this issue in current day Hungary is ensured by the fact that the political-social transition is prolonged and is accompanied by strengthening social and spatial polarisation. Experts in spatial planning and development have gradually recognised the importance of knowledge in this field, and the creators of concepts and plans now rely on these results. Correlations between life quality, life expectancies, health conditions, and place of residence are becoming increasingly acute; their recognition by people other than just the small community of professionals is because of the need for spatial rationalisation, which is a determining element in the structural reform of health services, and for equal opportunities. In the present study, the authors provide an account of the spatial differences in the availability of the ambulance service, this field representing a special segment of health services. Within the health system, it is a specific area in which highly appreciated changes have already taken place; the quality of services has improved, cost- efficiency has increased, and the availability of equal opportunities has strengthened. Preliminaries and methods Hungary's largest health service organisation of the time, the Hungarian National Ambulance and Emergency Service (HNAES; Országos Mentőszolgálat – OMSZ) was established soon after World War II, in 1948. Following a recommendation by the Economic Advisory Committee, the government decided to bring the existing historic ambulance services – the Budapest Voluntary Ambulance Society and the National Ambulance Society of Counties and Municipalities – under governmental possession, and ordered this measure to be implemented in Governmental Decree 4980/1948.
    [Show full text]