NewsNews and and Information Information

destination on its own right. The opening night was International docomomo highlighted by two Finnish keynote speakers, Juha Leiviskä and Juhani Pallasmaa. Leiviskä, who won Coference 2012 the Carlsberg Architectural Prize in 1995 gave an unforgettably personal presentation on his design ‘From Coffe Cup to General and underlined the use of light in many of his

— docomomo buildings. Juhani Pallasmaa spoke on “Newness, Plan’, Espoo, Finland Tradition and Identity”, convincing that newness in tradition means that each generation has to find By Timo Tuomi their own way to connect with tradition in order to achieve timeless works of art. Apart from interesting papers presented at three simultaneous sessions, an unforeseen success was a round table event on the Tugendthat house and its restoration on Wednesday. The space reserved for it filled over capacity but good humor prevailed. Wednesday´s keynote was John Allan speaking about the evolution of docomomo and what might be the future for an organization that has achieved international credibility over the years. Thursday was a traditional day for the Interna- tional Council meeting where several new chapters were accepted and welcomed to the docomo- mo family. The Secretariat in Barcelona was approved to continue their good work with great 1 applause and thanks for previous years. Thursday´s keynote speaker was Mikko Heikkinen from the firm Heikkinen–Komonen, internationally known ow does good design affect our physical sur- workshop was the campus area itself, because it is for example for their Finnish Embassy building in Hroundings in all scales from coffee cup to currently under enormous changes due to the merg- Washington D.C. Heikkinen gave examples of how 91 plan? This eternal question seemed be as topical as ing of three universities (technical, business and many of their competition entries, both successful ever during the 12th International docomomo design) in need for new buildings. The scale of the and not, were developed. Friday was the last day of Conference in Espoo, Finland this August. This was area will change as the results of a planning comple- evidenced by the amount of abstracts offered to tion, still under way, will be realized. the conference, 356 in all. The International Scien- Walks and excursions were offered before, dur- tific Committee of the conference achieved a minor ing and after the conference, some of the most pop- Figure 1. Ana Tostões, Chair of docomomo miracle in laboring out a selection of 78 to be pre- ular once being the longer ones east to Vyborg and International, at the 12th International sented as papers during three intensive days from Sunila and west to Turku all the way up to Aalto´s docomomo Conference. August 8 to 10. A number of abstracts were also Villa Mairea. Figure 2. Hubert–Jan Henket, first Chair of do- offered the chance of a poster presentation, and Tuesday the 7th was the opening day for the comomo International and Honorary President. delightfully many grabbed the chance to be noticed conference at the Espoo Cultural Centre, designed Figure 3. Timo Tuomi, docomomo Finland, in this way. by Arto Sipinen in 1989 that completed the cen- appreciates the commitment of Maija Kairamo The conference was preceded by the Interna- tre of Tapiola Carden City begun in 1952. Tapiola and Ana Tostões. tional docomomo workshop held at the Depart- is an internationally known example of post–war Figure 4. Ivo Hammer and Ana Tostões during ment of Architecture at Aalto University´s Otaniemi Scandinavian town planning, and it proved to be one of the docotours in Sunila. campus designed by Alvar Aalto. The topic of the a good choice for the conference as an excursion All photos @ docomomo International

2 3 4

docomomo 47 — 2012/2

docomomo_47.indd 91 08/12/12 18:29 News and Information

the conference proper, and included a round table 350) of docomomo members, welcoming comomo Maija Kairamo for her great work right on the possible survival of urban design in some words were presented by the delegation of the cho- from the beginning of foundation of the organiza- Northern cities. The afternoon was continued with sen hosts of the 13th docomomo International tion. And then there was food and drink and dance design on an urban scale, as the workshop awards Conference from Seoul, Korea. The next hosts deliv- to a band and a general feeling of exhaustion and were presented on the most interesting proposals ered welcoming words in such a tempting way that satisfaction due to a conference witnessing the for developing the Aalto campus. The keynote was left many booking the dates for 2014 already. After necessity and importance of docomomo as a

— docomomo a short and dynamic paper from Anthony Vidler on several eloquent thanks for everybody involved in dynamic organization. “Learning to Love Brutalism”. In the closing session, making the Espoo conference happening, a special which was a family gathering of hundreds (around thanks was given to the grand lady of Finnish do-

International docomomo of Arts, Design and Architecture in 2012. The Aalto University is planning to move a major Workshop August 2–7, 2 012 part of its functions from Helsinki into Otaniemi, Espoo. A two phase competition to design Aalto Department of Architecture, Otaniemi, Espoo, Finland University’s Otaniemi central campus and its main Head instructors: Professors Aino Niskanen and Olli–Paavo Koponen buildings facing the present. The former main build- Observer/Reporter: Panayotis Tournikiotis ing is arranged of which the first phase has just finished. The floor area of the new complex is about Is Aalto just a name for a brand? double compared with Alvar Aalto’s building. The future fate of Aalto´s buildings is unclear: By Olli Hakanen, Sirkkaliisa Jetsonen, Tommi Lindh and Aino Niskanen their uses will change and many of them are under- going renovations. The buildings have no formal pro- tection status although the area itself is included in the inventory of nationally significant cultural environments. For example the rector has moved away from the spaces which Aalto had designed as 92 a climax of his composition—the future use of these spaces is unclear. The leaders of the university have shown no real interest in the qualities Aalto´s archi- tecture—although masses of architectural tourists visit the area. The campus is also finally getting a subway con- nection to the inner city but it means at the same a pressure to condense the area with housing and commercial activities. What will happen to the char- acter of campus architecture or the green outdoors of housing areas? The planning of the totality is a fairly invisible process. There are several projects going on—the increase of residential and commer- Figure 1. Panayotis Tournikiotis reporting on the workshop results at the Docomomo Conference cial building is significant, more than doubling the final round table discussion August 10, 2012. Photo by Tommi Lindh. current amount in square meters. These topical questions were the starting point of the workshop which lasted a week was arranged as he Helsinki University of Technology got its The area has during the decades got additions and part of the Docomomo 2012 Conference. Unlike the Tpresent placement and layout in Otaniemi with alterations but the main features have however re- previous Docomomo workshops the participants Alvar Aalto´s competition winning entry from 1948. mained fairly intact. were not master students but young professionals Aalto´s red brick buildings freely grouped in the Today the situation has changed. Helsinki Uni- instead, as the organizers had wished a relevant middle of green revolving around the focus of a versity of Technology is annexed into a larger unit contribution for a situation facing real dramatic Greek theatre, the main auditorium, soon became of the Aalto University having joined The Univer- problems. They worked for a week with the aim of landmarks of modern architecture. The group of sity of Art and Design Helsinki and The Helsinki trying to understand the possibilities and threats buildings was complete to start as a functioning School of Economics since 2010. The Department of the Aalto building and their surroundings and campus university in the mid–1960s with student of Architecture was merged together with the presented their outcome at the conference. Smaller housing surrounding the educational buildings. University of Industrial Design into a new School presentations were made during the workshop.

docomomo 47 — 2012/2

docomomo_47.indd 92 08/12/12 18:29 The small group of participants was divided cial and commercial services in a way the desired whole area, the politics of a larger metropolis area, into two: One group was working with the aim of world class campus becomes possible. For example Aalto´s interiors. A site visit was made to the neigh- understanding the future of main interiors of the recreating the mobility system of the Otaniemi pen- boring faculty which is under renovation. The work- architecture department. They researched the inner insula has a crucial impact on the most beneficial groups commented that lectures and visits gave hierarchy of spaces and space sequences, materials use of land. good support for their work. and details: their authenticity, marks of wear and The group encouraged to fertilize the new archi- What was gained during the process? need of repair. Especially installations are under tecture with the best qualities of the existing envi- For the participants the current state of conser- pressure of many changes. The interior group made ronment and architectural heritage. Human scale, vation in the Aalto Campus might have come as a a SWOT analyses and gave some recommendations sensual detailing and intimate relation with nature surprise. A renowned area for its architectural qual- for future uses of the spaces. will always be current qualities of inspirational ar- ity together with the respect to Alvar Aalto’s work The other group worked on understanding the chitecture. may come as a shock case of cultural heritage in on–going change of the Otaniemi campus. Some A series of lectures illuminated different aspects: danger. At least the participants and some of the guidelines for planning and design were identified. the history of the university area, the measures of lecturers also, got a better overview and more Great care should be taken on designing the so- building protection, development plans for the knowledge of the current situation in the area today.

Lecturers: Jaakko Penttilä, Olli Hakanen, Kari Kontturi, Kaarin Taipale, Sirkkaliisa Jetsonen, Gretel Hemgård, Aino Niskanen, Staffan Lodenius, Henrik Wager, Jonas Malmberg, Juha Lemström, Tommi Lindh, Vladimir Slapeta. Invited specialists: Ana Tostões, Esa Laaksonen, Ivan Blasi, Maija Kairamo, Panayotis Tournikiotis, Vladimir Slapeta. Group 1 / General Plan and the space between buildings. Participants: Jonna Taegen, Architect, PhD student (Finland); Miguel Araujo, Architect, PhD student (Portugal); Salim al Elwazani, professor (USA). Facilitators: Aimo Nissi, Architect; Olli Hakanen, Architect. Group 2 / Volumes and spaces, building fabric, detailing and technical systems. Participants: Katariina Ockenström, Architect, PhD student (Finland); Marzio di Pace, Architect (Italy); Mihoko Ando, Architect, PhD student (Japan); Seija Linnanmäki, Architect, PhD student (Finland). Facilitators: Jonas Malmberg, Architect; Alvar Aalto Foundation. Ola Wedebrunn, Architect, Docent, Royal Technical University of Copenhagen. Observers: Han Na Song, Seung Tae Choi, Young–Cheol Kim.

93

2 3 4

Figure 2. Ana Tostões, Chair of docomomo International and Panayotis Tournikiotis, Chair ISC/Registers at the Workshop presentations.

Figure 3. Worksite tour in the former main build- ing of the former University of Technology. Pho- to by Tommi Lindh, August 3, 2012.

Figure 4. Architect Marzio di Pace (Group 2) presenting his initial findings regarding the De- partment of Architecture. Photo by Tommi Lindh, August 4, 2012.

Figure 5. Otaniemi core campus. Existing main- roads and parking lots can be transformed into academic and residential building sites, urban pedestrian spaces and extensions of parks.

5

News and Information docomomo 47 — 2012/2

docomomo_47.indd 93 08/12/12 18:29