WRHF Agenda - 2 - 20/05/26

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WRHF Agenda - 2 - 20/05/26 Media Release: Friday, May 22, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. To obtain a link to view this electronic meeting please contact [email protected] Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation Agenda Tuesday, May 26, 2020 5:30 p.m. This meeting will be held electronically Regional Administration Building 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener 1. Declarations of Conflict of Interest 2. Delegations 3. Accounts and Grant Summary *Page 117 3.1 2019 Draft Financial Statements Page 3 4. Approval of Minutes – January 28, 2020 Page 12 5. 2019-2020 Committees 5.1 Allocations and Finance Committee a) Project Grant: Lary Turner, The Company of Neighbours/Hespeler Heritage Centre re: Throwback Website (Digital Form of Historical Storytelling) Page 15 3294190 WRHF Agenda - 2 - 20/05/26 b) Project Grant: Scott Bradford re: Exterior Surface Preparation and Painting, 21 Lansdowne Road North, Cambridge Page 36 5.2 Heritage Advisory and Communications Committee a) 2020 Annual General Meeting – June 9, 2020 b) 2019 Award Nomination Updates 6. Correspondence – Available at Meeting 7. Other Business 7.1 External Comments for Approved Grants 8. Next Meeting – Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9. Adjourn 3294190 3 Financial Statements of WATERLOO REGIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION And Independent Auditors’ Report thereon Year ended December 31, 2019 DRAFT 4 KPMG LLP 115 King Street South 2nd Floor Waterloo ON N2J 5A3 Canada Tel 519 747-8800 Fax 519 747-8830 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT To the Board of Directors of Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation We have audited the financial statements of The Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation (the Entity), which comprise: • the statement of financial position as at December 31, 2019 • the statement of revenues and expenses for the year then ended • and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies (Hereinafter referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Entity as at December 31, 2019, and its results of operations for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian accounting standards for not-for-profit organizations. Basis for Opinion DRAFT We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements” section of our auditors’ report. We are independent of the Entity in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in Canada and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. 5 Page 2 Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with Canadian accounting standards for not-for-profit organizations and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Entity’s financial reporting process. Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the DRAFTbasis of the financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also: • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. 6 Page 3 • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Entity's internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management. • Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors’ report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors’ report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Entity to cease to continue as a going concern. • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. • Communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. DRAFT Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants Waterloo, Canada May _______ 7 WATERLOO REGIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION Statement of Financial Position December 31, 2019, with comparative information for 2018 2019 2018 Assets Cash $ 6,647 $ 7,402 Accounts receivable 554 558 Prepaid expenses 1,000 - Investments (note 2) 266,437 234,671 $ 274,638 $ 242,631 Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable $ - $ 334 Grants committed (note 3) 20,950 63,350 20,950 63,684 Fund balance: Accumulated net revenue 253,688 178,947 $ 274,638 $ 242,631 See accompanying notes to financial statements. DRAFT 1 8 WATERLOO REGIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION Statement of Revenues and Expenses Year ended December 31, 2019, with comparative information for 2018 2019 2018 Revenue Grant from Region of Waterloo $ 106,210 $ 106,210 Interest 6,248 4,884 112,458 111,094 Expenses (Schedule) 37,717 71,227 Net revenue 74,741 39,867 Accumulated net revenue, beginning of year 178,947 139,080 Accumulated net revenue, end of year $ 253,688 $ 178,947 See accompanying notes to financial statements. DRAFT 2 9 WATERLOO REGIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION Notes to Financial Statements Year ended December 31, 2019 Purpose of Foundation: The Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation is primarily a grant making organization which supports heritage initiatives in Waterloo Region. Its primary purpose is to preserve and financially assist in the preservation of heritage landmarks, historical buildings and other projects of historical significance to the Region of Waterloo. 1. Significant accounting policies: These financial statements are prepared in accordance with the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada Handbook Part III - Canadian accounting standards for not-for-profit organizations. The Foundation’s significant accounting policies are as follows: (a) Basis of accounting: The accrual basis of accounting is used for financial reporting (b) Fixed assets: The historical cost and accumulated depreciation of fixed assets is not reported. Expenses of a capital nature are charged against revenues in the year they are incurred. 2. Investments: In 1994, the Heritage Foundation transferred its investment funds to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The funds invested are due on demand and bear interest based on the net percentage earned by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Interest is paid monthly. DRAFT 3 10 WATERLOO REGIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
    Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Former CFB Rockcliffe Redevelopment Community Transportation Study
    June 2014 Former CFB Rockcliffe Redevelopment Community Transportation Study Prepared by: 12 February 2015 ERRATA SHEET The land use statistics associated with the Development Concept Plan for the Former CFB Rockcliffe Redevelopment are continually being refined as part of the on-going planning process. During the Summer 2014, the Plan was modified slightly from that used as the basis for the ensuing Community Transportation Study (dated 27 June 2014) resulting in approximate 40 additional residential units and 40 additional retail-related jobs. As a result of this land use change, the net change in two-way, peak hour vehicle trips to/from the site is noted to be an increase of approximately 60 veh/h, which is considered very minor in scale in comparison to the total projected generation of approximately 2,000 veh/h two-way. This small discrepancy in vehicle trip generation would have no bearing on the report’s finding or recommendations. A subsequent update to the Development Concept Plan was received in January 2015 reflecting very minor adjustments to the proposed land use. In September 2014, the National Capital Commission announced the renaming of the Rockcliffe Parkway to the Sir George-Étienne Cartier Parkway (Promenade Sir George-Étienne Cartier). This name change has not been reflected within the current version of the report. In December 2014, the City of Ottawa requested that the CTS include commentary/analyses related to multi-modal level of service as outlined within the 2013 update of the Transportation Master Plan, Ottawa Cycling Plan and Ottawa Pedestrian Plan. The draft analysis related to this most recent City request is included herein as an Addendum No.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Synopsis
    Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucester Street Names Including Vanier, Rockcliffe, and East and South Ottawa
    Gloucester Street Names Including Vanier, Rockcliffe, and East and South Ottawa Updated March 8, 2021 Do you know the history behind a street name not on the list? Please contact us at [email protected] with the details. • - The Gloucester Historical Society wishes to thank others for sharing their research on street names including: o Société franco-ontarienne du patrimoine et de l’histoire d’Orléans for Orléans street names https://www.sfopho.com o The Hunt Club Community Association for Hunt Club street names https://hunt-club.ca/ and particularly John Sankey http://johnsankey.ca/name.html o Vanier Museoparc and Léo Paquette for Vanier street names https://museoparc.ca/en/ Neighbourhood Street Name Themes Neighbourhood Theme Details Examples Alta Vista American States The portion of Connecticut, Michigan, Urbandale Acres Illinois, Virginia, others closest to Heron Road Blackburn Hamlet Streets named with Eastpark, Southpark, ‘Park’ Glen Park, many others Blossom Park National Research Queensdale Village Maass, Parkin, Council scientists (Queensdale and Stedman Albion) on former Metcalfe Road Field Station site (Radar research) Eastway Gardens Alphabeted streets Avenue K, L, N to U Hunt Club Castles The Chateaus of Hunt Buckingham, Club near Riverside Chatsworth, Drive Cheltenham, Chambord, Cardiff, Versailles Hunt Club Entertainers West part of Hunt Club Paul Anka, Rich Little, Dean Martin, Boone Hunt Club Finnish Municipalities The first section of Tapiola, Tammela, Greenboro built near Rastila, Somero, Johnston Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006-2007
    CELEBRATING OUR 25th ANNIVERSARY 1982 - 2007 It’s 1982 and... Pierre Elliott Trudeau is Prime Minister The Canada Act and Constitution Act are enacted into law Cats opens on Broadway First artificial heart is implanted in Barney Clark Boeing 747 is introduced On television we are watching 60 Minutes, Dallas and M*A*S*H Mayors are. Claudette Millar, Cambridge Morley Rosenberg, Kitchener Marjorie Carroll, Waterloo A mysterious disease is reported - AIDS Computers reach 1.5 million homes, fives times the number in 1980 E.T. and Tootsie are tops at the box office The Kitchener Rangers win their first Memorial Cup after playing against Hull in the finals Independent Living Centre of Waterloo Region is established! ANNUAL REPORT 2006 | 2007 milestones of the past 25 years 1981 Henry Enns works with local leaders Brice Balmer, Clare Shantz and Ray Schlegel to establish the first Independent Living Centre in Canada 1982 Opening of the Independent Living Centre of Waterloo Region at Erb Street Mennonite Church in Waterloo Start of the United Nations’ International Decade of the Disabled ILCWR takes over the Kids on the Block program from Rotaract (young adults chartered with Rotary International) 1983 Mooregate Supportive Housing Project is started In Home Respite Program begins 1985 Outreach Program is started Head office moves to 235 King Street East in Kitchener 1986 Canadian Association of Independent Living Centres (CAILC) is established as a national organization that currently supports 28 centres across the country 1987 ILCWR incorporates
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL COUNCIL MINUTES Wednesday, February 27, 2008
    REGIONAL COUNCIL MINUTES Wednesday, February 27, 2008 The following are the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held at 7:08 p.m. in the Regional Council Chamber, 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario, with the following members present: Chair K. Seiling, J. Brewer, D. Craig, K. Denouden, T. Galloway, J. Haalboom, B. Halloran, R. Kelterborn, J. Mitchell, W. Roth, J. Smola, B. Strauss, S. Strickland, J. Wideman, and C. Zehr. Members Absent: C. Millar DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST UNDER THE MUNICIPAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT None declared. CLOSED SESSION MOVED by J. Smola SECONDED by K. Denouden That a closed meeting of Council be held on February 27, 2008 at 5:30 p.m., in accordance with Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, for the purposes of considering the following subject matters: a) matters related to Council procedures b) potential litigation related to court proceedings CARRIED MOVED by J. Mitchell SECONDED by K. Denouden The Council reconvene in Open Session. CARRIED PRESENTATIONS Lucille Bish, Director Community Services introduced each of the award recipients and provided background information. She acknowledged representatives from a number of organizations that were also present this evening. a) Ontario Heritage Trust Young Heritage Leaders Certificate of Achievement was presented to Mr. Phillip Rempel for his 10 years service as a junior interpreter at Joseph Schneider Haus. b) Ontario Heritage Trust Young Heritage Leaders Certificate of Achievement was presented to Cameron Heights Collegiate Students for their contribution to the Waterloo- Wellington Children’s Groundwater Festival at Doon Heritage Crossroads. Council Minutes - 2 - 08/02/27 c) Ontario Heritage Trust, Heritage Community Recognition Program Certificate of Achievement was presented to Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    15 bus time schedule & line map 15 Blair View In Website Mode The 15 bus line (Blair) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Blair: 12:24 AM - 11:57 PM (2) Parliament ~ Parlement: 12:09 AM - 11:39 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 15 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 15 bus arriving. Direction: Blair 15 bus Time Schedule 55 stops Blair Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:18 AM - 11:51 PM Monday 12:21 AM - 11:57 PM Laurier / Élisabeth-Bruyère 69 Rue Laurier, Gatineau Tuesday 12:24 AM - 11:57 PM Allumettières / Laurier Wednesday 12:24 AM - 11:57 PM 103 Rue Laurier, Gatineau Thursday 12:24 AM - 11:57 PM Maisonneuve / Allumettières Friday 12:24 AM - 11:57 PM Boulevard Maisonneuve, Gatineau Saturday 12:24 AM - 11:48 PM Maisonneuve / Papineau 60 Rue Dollard-Des Ormeaux, Gatineau Maisonneuve / Place D'Accueil Promenade du Portage, Gatineau 15 bus Info Direction: Blair Wellington / Bay Stops: 55 344 Wellington St, Ottawa Trip Duration: 37 min Line Summary: Laurier / Élisabeth-Bruyère, Lyon A Allumettières / Laurier, Maisonneuve / Allumettières, 383 Albert Street, Ottawa Maisonneuve / Papineau, Maisonneuve / Place D'Accueil, Wellington / Bay, Lyon A, Slater / Kent, Slater / Kent Queen / Kent, Parliament / Parlement, Queen / 345 Slater Street, Ottawa Metcalfe, Elgin / Wellington, Rideau B, Rideau / Cumberland, Rideau / King Edward, Rideau / Nelson, Queen / Kent Rideau / Friel, Rideau / Augusta, Rideau / Charlotte, 310 Queen Street, Ottawa Rideau / Wurtemburg, Montréal / Montgomery, Montréal
    [Show full text]
  • September 2020 Update
    September 2020 Update Transportation Services Department FEDCo September 1, 20201 2 O-Train South Design Progress • The following submissions have been Issued-For- Construction: – Structures throughout the alignment including Rail Bridges at Airport Parkway, Uplands, Leitrim, Bowesville, Earl Armstrong and Lester; and, – Utility Relocations throughout the alignment. 3 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received construction drawings of the following project elements: – Airport Station; – Guideway for the Airport Link; and, – Structures throughout the alignment including High Road MUP Bridge, Limebank Road Elevated Guideway, Airport Elevated Guideway, VIA Grade Separation, Rideau River Pedestrian Bridge. 4 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received final design drawings of the following project elements: – Guideway for the South Extension to Limebank; – Guideway for the existing portion of the line; – Landscape design for the existing line and Airport Link; – Dow’s Lake Tunnel, including Tunnel Ventilation; and – Vehicle elements, including the driver’s cab, interior layout and HVAC System. 5 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received pre-final design drawings of the following project elements: – Walkley Yard Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF); – Operational Modelling for the Overall System and the MSF; – Signaling and Train Control System; – Greenboro, Carleton, Mooney’s Bay, Gladstone and Walkley Stations; and, – Communication Systems designs for Greenboro and Carleton Stations and interface control documents for several subsystems on the project. 6 O-Train South Construction Progress • Rock excavation started on Gladstone Station; • Walkley Maintenance and Storage Facility structure construction has commenced; • Work has commenced at Ellwood Diamond grade separation. Caisson construction is underway; • Work has begun on Carleton south MUP; and, • Commenced work at South Keys and Bowesville Stations.
    [Show full text]
  • September 11, 2012 10:15 A.M
    MEDIA RELEASE: Friday, September 7, 2012, 4:30 p.m. REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:15 a.m. (Time is approximate; meeting follows Community Services Committee) Regional Council Chamber 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario 1. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST UNDER THE MUNICIPAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT 2. DELEGATIONS 3. REPORTS – Regional Chair a) RC-12-001, Jack Young Award, Councillor Length-of-Service Recognition and 1 Region of Waterloo Naming Policy REPORTS - Finance b) F-12-065, Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Sale Price Index 14 c) F-12-066, Ontario Municipal Infrastructure Strategy 17 d) F-12-067, Support for the Town of Tillsonburg Council Resolution on Business Tax 19 Capping e) F-12-068, Prescribed Rates for Heads and Beds Payments in Lieu of Taxation 23 4. INFORMATION/CORRESPONDENCE 5. OTHER BUSINESS a) Council Enquiries and Requests for Information Tracking List 28 6. NEXT MEETING – September 25, 2012 7. MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION THAT a closed meeting of the Community Services, Administration and Finance and Planning and Works Committees be held on Tuesday, September 11, 2012 immediately following the Administration and Finance Committee meeting in the Waterloo County Room, in accordance with Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, for the purposes of considering the following subject matters: a) personal matters about identifiable individuals - committee appointments b) litigation or potential litigation related to a contract c) litigation or potential litigation and receiving of legal advice and opinion that is subject to solicitor-client privilege related to a contract 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Montreal-Blair Road Transit Priority Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment (EA) Study
    Montreal-Blair Road Transit Priority Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment (EA) Study Agency Consultation Group Meeting #2 19 November 2019 Agenda • Welcome / Introductions • Study Update • Alternative Solutions • Alternative Designs • Next Steps 2 Project Limits Coordination with Montreal Road Revitalization Project Coordination with Montreal LRT Station design Subject to coordination with Brian Coburn Extension / Cumberland Transitway Westerly Alternate Corridor EA Study 3 Study Objectives • Investigate options to improve transit service and travel environment for all modes • Consult with a broad range of stakeholders • Connect to Blair and future Montreal Road LRT Stations and other destinations to provide mobility options for the community • Identify interim and ultimate configurations for corridor modifications • Establish right-of-way requirements and project cost estimates • Prepare a Recommended Plan and Environmental Project Report 4 Need and Opportunities Transportation Master Plan (2013) • Designated Transit Priority Corridor (Continuous Lanes) as part of Ultimate Network • Transit Priority Corridors complement the rapid transit network, improve city-wide transit access to major employment, commercial, and institutional uses • Infrastructure to accommodate future travel demand and meet modal share objectives 5 Need and Opportunities Current transit service operates in mixed traffic, affecting the speed and reliability Opportunities to improve transit user experience: • Physical measures (bus lanes, queue jumps) • Traffic
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE MASTER PLAN Final Report
    CAMBRIDGE HERITAGE MASTER PLAN Final Report Prepared for The Corporation of the City of Cambridge Prepared by BRAY Heritage with ERA Architects Inc. Archaeological Services Inc. Maltby & Associates Inc. the Tourism Company June 2008 USER GUIDE 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 PART A: STUDY PURPOSE 15 1. Making a Case for Heritage Master Planning 1.1 What is “Heritage”? 17 1.2 Why Make a Heritage Master Plan? 18 1.3 What are the Plan’s Terms of Reference? 20 2. Producing a Heritage Master Plan 2.1 Study Method 23 2.2 Study Team 25 PART B: HERITAGE RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES 27 3. The Range of Heritage Resources to be Considered 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Context for Conservation 30 3.3 Built Heritage Resources 33 3.4 Cultural Heritage Landscapes 36 3.5 Archaeological Resources 40 4. Valued Aspects of Cambridge’s Past 4.1 Introduction 41 4.2 The First Setting 41 4.3 Rural Beginnings 43 4.4 Historical Development of the Component Communities 54 4.5 Patterns of Urban Development 68 4.6 Industrial Heart 73 4.7 Public Spaces 74 5. Shared Community Values Expressed in Place 5.1 What People Said About Cambridge 79 5.2 Current Values for Place 80 5.3 Common Values 86 5.4 From Values to Themes 88 6. A Toolkit of Ways of Celebrating the Past 6.1 Good Ideas from Elsewhere 93 1 6.2 Conservation and Development Tools 98 6.3 Character Areas 106 6.4 Individual Resources 134 6.5 Personal Histories 136 PART C: OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 139 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Realstrategy.Com R E a L S T R a T E G Y
    Real Strategy Market Outlook: Q3 2018 RealStrategy.com R E A L S T R A T E G Y Real Strategy Market Outlook: Q3 2018 The 3rd Quarter of 2018 saw a significant amount of leasing activity in Ottawa by the Federal Government. Showing clear signs that public purse strings have been loosened, the public service has returned to the market place in force while steady demand from the private sector places Ottawa on a path to a balanced market. Greater Ottawa’s overall office availability fell from 10.7% in Q2 2018 to 10.1% continuing a downward trend that started this time last year. Downtown Class C Availability fell sharply by 5.3% due primarily from Nav Canada’s committing to lease all 133,000 sq. ft. of 151 Slater Street last quarter. Class A Availability remained relatively flat at 5.9%, while Class B Availability dropped from 11% to 9.8%; a 4th consecutive quarter of shrinking inventory. Real Strategy understands that significant additional government demand is still to come and expects the A and B Class downtown office space to continue to be absorbed at an increasing pace until the next Federal election expected in the fall of 2019. Downtown Available Rate by Class Greater Ottawa Availability 6,000,000 30 5,000,000 25 4,000,000 20 3,000,000 15 2,000,000 10 1,000,000 5 0 0 RealStrategy.com Largest Downtown Vacancies Total Available 18% 44% 19% 38% 40% 31% 55% 14% Rate: Address 45 O’Connor Street 110 O’Connor Street Constitution Square Killeany Place 473 Albert Street 222-230 Queen 85 Albert Street Constitution Square (I) (III) Total Office Area (sq.
    [Show full text]