BENN Newsletter Is a Pub Li Return for Another Exciting Year! Ca Tion of St
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report 2006-2007
CELEBRATING OUR 25th ANNIVERSARY 1982 - 2007 It’s 1982 and... Pierre Elliott Trudeau is Prime Minister The Canada Act and Constitution Act are enacted into law Cats opens on Broadway First artificial heart is implanted in Barney Clark Boeing 747 is introduced On television we are watching 60 Minutes, Dallas and M*A*S*H Mayors are. Claudette Millar, Cambridge Morley Rosenberg, Kitchener Marjorie Carroll, Waterloo A mysterious disease is reported - AIDS Computers reach 1.5 million homes, fives times the number in 1980 E.T. and Tootsie are tops at the box office The Kitchener Rangers win their first Memorial Cup after playing against Hull in the finals Independent Living Centre of Waterloo Region is established! ANNUAL REPORT 2006 | 2007 milestones of the past 25 years 1981 Henry Enns works with local leaders Brice Balmer, Clare Shantz and Ray Schlegel to establish the first Independent Living Centre in Canada 1982 Opening of the Independent Living Centre of Waterloo Region at Erb Street Mennonite Church in Waterloo Start of the United Nations’ International Decade of the Disabled ILCWR takes over the Kids on the Block program from Rotaract (young adults chartered with Rotary International) 1983 Mooregate Supportive Housing Project is started In Home Respite Program begins 1985 Outreach Program is started Head office moves to 235 King Street East in Kitchener 1986 Canadian Association of Independent Living Centres (CAILC) is established as a national organization that currently supports 28 centres across the country 1987 ILCWR incorporates -
REGIONAL COUNCIL MINUTES Wednesday, February 27, 2008
REGIONAL COUNCIL MINUTES Wednesday, February 27, 2008 The following are the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held at 7:08 p.m. in the Regional Council Chamber, 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario, with the following members present: Chair K. Seiling, J. Brewer, D. Craig, K. Denouden, T. Galloway, J. Haalboom, B. Halloran, R. Kelterborn, J. Mitchell, W. Roth, J. Smola, B. Strauss, S. Strickland, J. Wideman, and C. Zehr. Members Absent: C. Millar DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST UNDER THE MUNICIPAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT None declared. CLOSED SESSION MOVED by J. Smola SECONDED by K. Denouden That a closed meeting of Council be held on February 27, 2008 at 5:30 p.m., in accordance with Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, for the purposes of considering the following subject matters: a) matters related to Council procedures b) potential litigation related to court proceedings CARRIED MOVED by J. Mitchell SECONDED by K. Denouden The Council reconvene in Open Session. CARRIED PRESENTATIONS Lucille Bish, Director Community Services introduced each of the award recipients and provided background information. She acknowledged representatives from a number of organizations that were also present this evening. a) Ontario Heritage Trust Young Heritage Leaders Certificate of Achievement was presented to Mr. Phillip Rempel for his 10 years service as a junior interpreter at Joseph Schneider Haus. b) Ontario Heritage Trust Young Heritage Leaders Certificate of Achievement was presented to Cameron Heights Collegiate Students for their contribution to the Waterloo- Wellington Children’s Groundwater Festival at Doon Heritage Crossroads. Council Minutes - 2 - 08/02/27 c) Ontario Heritage Trust, Heritage Community Recognition Program Certificate of Achievement was presented to Ms. -
GRCA Minutes
GRCA Minutes Grand River Conservation Authority, 400 Clyde Road, Cambridge, Ontario N1R 5W6 Tel: (519) 621-2761 Fax: (519) 621-4844 Internet: www.grandriver.ca January 2007 Many new faces on GRCA board exploration of two different ways of increasing power for the City of Volume 13 – No. 1 The November municipal election Woodstock. has resulted in many changes in GRCA appointments to the GRCA board and Schneider Power Inc. is preparing more changes are expected in January. an environmental screening report of General Membership a small scale wind farm on agricultur- The most notable change is that al land north of Arthur. The proposed Chairman - Open Peter Krause, who chaired the board wind farm is on 400 acres and will 1st Vice-Chairman - Alan Dale for nine years, was not reappointed by have five wind turbines, each generat- the Region of Waterloo. Krause was a 2nd Vice-Chairman - Vic Prendergast ing about 1.5 MW of power. citizen appointee and Waterloo Townships of Amaranth, East Regional Council has taken a new Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. is Garafraxa, East Luther Grand Valley, approach, by only appointing elected preparing an environmental assess- Melancthon and Southgate - politicians and not citizen representa- ment for two 10 MW wind farms in Tom Nevills tives to the GRCA board. Krause East Luther Grand Valley. Four to six Townships of Mapleton and served on the GRCA board for 21 wind power turbines are proposed for Wellington North - Pat Salter years and spent five years as chair of each site. Conservation Ontario, where he was a Township of Centre Wellington - Hydro One is considering two dif- champion of conservation on a Shawn Watters ferent ways of providing additional provincial level. -
September 11, 2012 10:15 A.M
MEDIA RELEASE: Friday, September 7, 2012, 4:30 p.m. REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:15 a.m. (Time is approximate; meeting follows Community Services Committee) Regional Council Chamber 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario 1. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST UNDER THE MUNICIPAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT 2. DELEGATIONS 3. REPORTS – Regional Chair a) RC-12-001, Jack Young Award, Councillor Length-of-Service Recognition and 1 Region of Waterloo Naming Policy REPORTS - Finance b) F-12-065, Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Sale Price Index 14 c) F-12-066, Ontario Municipal Infrastructure Strategy 17 d) F-12-067, Support for the Town of Tillsonburg Council Resolution on Business Tax 19 Capping e) F-12-068, Prescribed Rates for Heads and Beds Payments in Lieu of Taxation 23 4. INFORMATION/CORRESPONDENCE 5. OTHER BUSINESS a) Council Enquiries and Requests for Information Tracking List 28 6. NEXT MEETING – September 25, 2012 7. MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION THAT a closed meeting of the Community Services, Administration and Finance and Planning and Works Committees be held on Tuesday, September 11, 2012 immediately following the Administration and Finance Committee meeting in the Waterloo County Room, in accordance with Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, for the purposes of considering the following subject matters: a) personal matters about identifiable individuals - committee appointments b) litigation or potential litigation related to a contract c) litigation or potential litigation and receiving of legal advice and opinion that is subject to solicitor-client privilege related to a contract 8. -
HERITAGE MASTER PLAN Final Report
CAMBRIDGE HERITAGE MASTER PLAN Final Report Prepared for The Corporation of the City of Cambridge Prepared by BRAY Heritage with ERA Architects Inc. Archaeological Services Inc. Maltby & Associates Inc. the Tourism Company June 2008 USER GUIDE 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 PART A: STUDY PURPOSE 15 1. Making a Case for Heritage Master Planning 1.1 What is “Heritage”? 17 1.2 Why Make a Heritage Master Plan? 18 1.3 What are the Plan’s Terms of Reference? 20 2. Producing a Heritage Master Plan 2.1 Study Method 23 2.2 Study Team 25 PART B: HERITAGE RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES 27 3. The Range of Heritage Resources to be Considered 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Context for Conservation 30 3.3 Built Heritage Resources 33 3.4 Cultural Heritage Landscapes 36 3.5 Archaeological Resources 40 4. Valued Aspects of Cambridge’s Past 4.1 Introduction 41 4.2 The First Setting 41 4.3 Rural Beginnings 43 4.4 Historical Development of the Component Communities 54 4.5 Patterns of Urban Development 68 4.6 Industrial Heart 73 4.7 Public Spaces 74 5. Shared Community Values Expressed in Place 5.1 What People Said About Cambridge 79 5.2 Current Values for Place 80 5.3 Common Values 86 5.4 From Values to Themes 88 6. A Toolkit of Ways of Celebrating the Past 6.1 Good Ideas from Elsewhere 93 1 6.2 Conservation and Development Tools 98 6.3 Character Areas 106 6.4 Individual Resources 134 6.5 Personal Histories 136 PART C: OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 139 7. -
Consolidated Council Agenda
Media Release: Immediate Regional Municipality of Waterloo Consolidated Council Agenda Wednesday, March 19, 2014 Closed Session 6:30 p.m. Waterloo County Room Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Regional Council Chamber 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, ON *Denotes Item(s) Not Part of Original Agenda 1. Moment of Silence 2. Roll Call 3. Motion To Go Into Closed Session That a closed meeting of Council be held on Wednesday, March 19, 2014 at 6:30 p.m. in the Waterloo County Room in accordance with Section 239 of the “Municipal Act, 2001”, for the purposes of considering the following subject matters: a) receiving of legal advice subject to solicitor-client privilege related to a legal matter * b) receiving of advice subject to solicitor-client privilege related to a purchasing matter 4. Motion to Reconvene Into Open Session 5. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest Under “The Municipal Conflict of Interest Act” 1590113 Council Agenda - 2 - 14/03/19 6. Presentations 7. Petitions 8. Delegations * a) Nancy Goucher, Program Manager, Environmental Defence, Re: Bill 6, “Great Lakes Protection Act, 2013” (item #10 a) b) Stage 1 Light Rail Transit Project (Item #7 on P&W Summary): 1) Mark Reusser, Waterloo Federation of Agriculture 2) Kate Daley, Waterloo 3) John Shortreed, Waterloo 1 * 4) Chuck Howitt, Kitchener (not representing TriTAG) * 5) Fatima Pereira, Cambridge * 6) Craig Beattie, Perimeter Development Corporation The following delegations have 3 minutes: * 7) Robert Milligan, New Dundee * 8) Anna Beard, Waterloo * 9) Lee Angold, Kitchener * 10) John Reick, Waterloo c) Doug Craig’s Notice of Motion: * 1) Michael Druker, Kitchener * 2) Sandra Hill, Cambridge * 3) Greg Durocher, Cambridge * 4) Lin Stevens, Cambridge * 5) Andrew Dodds, Waterloo 9. -
Made by Canadians Fabrication Canadienne
Section 3: MADE BY CANADIANS “making” a car is a possible factor in determining a car’s ‘nationality’ 3.0 introduction 3.0T1 / SECTION TITLE Made by Canadians Fabrication canadienne 3.0T2 / MAIN TEXT Does the label ‘Made in Canada’ single out the truly ‘Canadian’ car? Canada has long been a major player in the auto industry— it was the world’s second largest producer of cars in the 1920s and ’30s. Is a car Canadian because it is built in Canada, by Canadians, for Canadians, with Canadian materials? How important is all of this in measuring a car’s ‘Canadian-ness’? Consider the history, and judge for yourself. L’indication « fait au Canada » caractérise-t-elle véritablement une « voiture canadienne » ? Le Canada joue depuis longtemps un rôle principal dans l’industrie automobile – il était le deuxième constructeur automobile mondial dans les années 1920 et 1930. Un véhicule est-il canadien parce qu’il est construit au Canada, par et pour des Canadiens, et avec des matériaux canadiens ? En quoi tout cela joue-t-il dans la « canadienneté » d’un véhicule ? Considérez les faits historiques, et jugez-en par vous-mêmes. Canadian Car / MADE BY CANADIANS / Section 3.0 26 BASED ON IP V 6.2 / 2010 12 04 March 11, 2010 3.1 I/A1 “Build-A-Car” 3.1 I/A T1 / TITLE 3.1 I/A1 Mechanical English Interactive “Build-A-Car” French Toddlers’ Interactive Discovery Zone 3.1 I/A T2 / INSTRUCTIONS (FOR PARents) English French 3.1 I/A T3 / TEXT English French 3.1 P1 / SUPERGRAPHIC IMAGE GIVES INTERACTIVE AREA THE APPEARANCE OF A manufactuRING PLANT Photocopy: High Res Recieved: Canadian Car / MADE BY CANADIANS / Section 3.1 27 BASED ON IP V 6.2 / 2010 12 04 March 11, 2010 3.2 Different Types of ‘Made in Canada’? 3.2T1 ADVANCE ORGANIZER The label ‘Made in Canada’ might fill Canadians with pride, but it can mean many different things. -
REGIONAL COUNCIL MINUTES Wednesday, December 8, 2010
REGIONAL COUNCIL MINUTES Wednesday, December 8, 2010 The Inaugural Meeting of the Council of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo for the term 2010- 2014 was held in the Regional Council Chamber, 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario, commencing at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was called to order by K. Fletcher, Regional Clerk as Presiding Officer, in the presence of the Honourable Justice Mr. Patrick J. Flynn, Regional Chair K. Seiling, Regional Councillors, M. Murray, Chief Administrative Officer and Guests. CLOSED SESSION MOVED by B. Halloran SECONDED by J. Haalboom THAT a closed meeting of Council be held on December 8, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. in Waterloo County Room, in accordance with Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, for the purposes of considering the following subject matters: a) labour relations related to contract negotiations CARRIED MOVED by T. Galloway SECONDED by J. Wideman THAT Council reconvene in Open Session. CARRIED The meeting opened with the singing of “O Canada” with music provided by members of the Brass Players Anonymous. Regional Clerk K. Fletcher acknowledged the participation in this evening’s proceedings of Piper, Staff Sgt. (Ret’d) Nigel Moore, Waterloo Regional Police Services and the Brass Players Anonymous. Regional Clerk K. Fletcher read the Certificate of Qualification of the Regional Chair and the elected Regional Councillors as follows: Regional Chair: Ken Seiling Regional Councillors - Cambridge: Jane Brewer and Claudette Millar Regional Councillors – Kitchener: Tom Galloway, Jean Haalboom, Geoff Lorentz and Jim Wideman Regional Councillors – Waterloo: Jane Mitchell and Sean Strickland Regional Clerk K. Fletcher read the Certificate of Qualification from the Area Municipalities designating the Area Mayors to Regional Council. -
PHE-IDS-18-06, Waterloo Region Supervised Injection Services Feasibility Study Recommendations Page 3 Recommendation
Media Release: Immediate Regional Municipality of Waterloo Consolidated Special Council Agenda Tuesday, April 10, 2018 9:00 a.m. Regional Council Chamber 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario * Denotes item(s) not part of Original Agenda The purpose of the meeting is to deal with the report regarding Supervised Injection Services Feasibility Study Recommendations. 1. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest Under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act 2. Motion To Go Into Committee Of The Whole To Consider Reports 3. Reports a) PHE-IDS-18-06, Waterloo Region Supervised Injection Services Feasibility Study Recommendations Page 3 Recommendation: That the Regional Municipality of Waterloo take the following actions regarding Supervised Injection Services in Waterloo Region: a) Further pursue supervised injection services in Waterloo Region as an intervention to prevent fatal opioid overdoses; b) Further pursue supervised injection services that are integrated with other services, which at a minimum includes the mandatory components of the provincial program but will also include basic health care and access to 2695542 Version: 2 Special Council Agenda 2A 18/04/10 treatment; Pursue up to three supervised injection sites in Waterloo Region as a starting point to support access for people who inject drugs; c) Work with health service partners, staff from the 3 cities, and other stakeholders to identify potential site locations that meet the requirements for Federal approval and Provincial funding, and, to the extent possible, address the concerns raised during the Phase 1 consultation process; and d) Endorse the plan to initiate Phase 2 of the Waterloo Region Supervised Injection Services Feasibility Study, as described in Report PHE-IDS-18-06 4. -
Growth Management and Regional Government
Growth Management and Regional Government: How an Interpretive Approach Can Explain Politicians’ Commitment to Smart Growth Policies in Waterloo Region, Ontario Caitlin Michelle Daley A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Political Science York University Toronto, Ontario June 2017 © Caitlin Michelle Daley, 2017 ii Abstract This dissertation is a case study that explains how the Waterloo area’s regional government in Ontario, Canada, came to embrace smart growth policies, which aim to protect agricultural and environmentally sensitive areas from urban sprawl while creating more dense urban communities. It develops an interpretive approach based on Mark Bevir and Rod Rhodes’s work on situated agency to explain why the 2010 to 2014 Region of Waterloo council defended the Region’s smart growth policies against two major challenges, choosing to build its intensification-focused light rail transit (LRT) project despite public controversy, and choosing to appeal an Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) ruling that threatened its most recent official plan. Based on interviews, archival research, and document review, the dissertation is written in three parts that tell three kinds of stories, using Bevir and Rhodes’s concepts of tradition, dilemma, and webs of beliefs. Part I uses a historical narrative to explain the tradition of growth management and regional government in the Waterloo area. It finds that regional government and growth management have conditioned each other over the course of the last half century. Part II explains the dilemmas that the 2010 to 2014 regional council faced as a group in deciding to defend its smart growth policies. -
Highlights of the Regional Growth Management Strategy (Rgms)
Waterloo Region is one of the fastest growing communities in Canada, and has long been recognized as a leader in technical innovation, environmental protection and growth management. Discover some of our most recent community successes as we plan for a bright and prosperous future. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (RGMS) the RGMS DID YOU KNOW THAT WATERLOO REGION HAS A LONG AND SUCCESSFUL HISTORY OF BALANCING GROWTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE? North America’s first Blue Box program was launched in Waterloo Region in 1983. The Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation was the first heritage foundation to be set up by a Regional government. Waterloo Region was the first Canadian community to implement a comprehensive Water Resources Protection Strategy and the first in Ontario to require watershed planning as a part of the urban development process. In 2005, Waterloo Region experienced the second fastest economic growth rate in Canada. A 5.1 per cent growth rate in real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) far exceeded the provincial and national averages. The Region was the first mid-sized community in Ontario to appoint a full-time staff member to develop and implement a Transportation Demand Management program that is now being actively promoted through local businesses and schools. Since 2000, Grand River Transit has increased ridership by 33 per cent and now carries 13 million riders annually. This number is steadily growing thanks to ongoing, system-wide service improvements and programs like the UPASS that is currently providing transit passes to approximately 9,500 post-secondary students as part of their tuition. -
GSA-Research-Housing-Issues.Pdf
UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO GRADUATE STUDENT ASSOCIATION Research Report for Council Municipal Housing Issues August 2020 Prepared By: Dr. Nick Revington Amanda McCulley, MA Candidate GSA Research Report Municipal Housing Issues Table of Contents 1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Issue .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Graduate Students .................................................................................................................................... 2 Student Homelessness ............................................................................................................................. 2 3. Background ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Local Context ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Housing Situation of GSA Members ..................................................................................................... 2 Housing Market .................................................................................................................................... 3 University of Waterloo ..............................................................................................................................